Next Article in Journal
Do Resettled People Adapt to Their Current Geographical Environment? Evidence from Poverty-Stricken Areas of Northwest Yunnan Province, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Summary of Year-One Effort of the RCMI Consortium to Enhance Research Capacity and Diversity with Data Science
Previous Article in Journal
Restorative Effects of Observing Natural and Urban Scenery after Working Memory Depletion
Previous Article in Special Issue
Building Trust and Awareness to Increase AZ Native Nation Participation in COVID-19 Vaccines
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Building Research Infrastructure: The Development of a Technical Assistance Group-Service Center at an RCMI

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(1), 191; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010191
by Monica R. Lininger 1,2,*, Christine Kirby 2, Kelly A. Laurila 2,3, Indrakshi Roy 3, Marcelle Coder 2,3, Catherine R. Propper 2,4, Robert T. Trotter II 2 and Julie A. Baldwin 2,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(1), 191; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010191
Submission received: 28 October 2022 / Revised: 7 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Even the long-term work on the project described in the paper has to be appreciated, this paper seems to be more a report on the implementation of a specific funded project than a research paper to be published in a high visibility and quality journal. Therefore it does not lead to scientific conclusions, but only to a resume on the work performed.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

I enjoyed reading this article, thank you to all authors.

Can you please itemize the contributions from the beginning to the current stage? 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The abstract must provide the reader a brief description about the whole paper within a concise paragraph. It can be formed as: a few-sentences introduction, followed by short highlights of the plot, procedure and the results. I believe the abstract can be improved.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper is in fact only a project report or at the very best it can be considered a general conference paper, but not a scientific article to be published as a scientific article in a high visibility journal.

Back to TopTop