Building Research Infrastructure: The Development of a Technical Assistance Group-Service Center at an RCMI
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Even the long-term work on the project described in the paper has to be appreciated, this paper seems to be more a report on the implementation of a specific funded project than a research paper to be published in a high visibility and quality journal. Therefore it does not lead to scientific conclusions, but only to a resume on the work performed.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
I enjoyed reading this article, thank you to all authors.
Can you please itemize the contributions from the beginning to the current stage?
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 3 Report
The abstract must provide the reader a brief description about the whole paper within a concise paragraph. It can be formed as: a few-sentences introduction, followed by short highlights of the plot, procedure and the results. I believe the abstract can be improved.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
This paper is in fact only a project report or at the very best it can be considered a general conference paper, but not a scientific article to be published as a scientific article in a high visibility journal.