Next Article in Journal
Psychosocial Risks among Quebec Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Social Media Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Diagnostic Accuracy and Measurement Properties of Instruments Screening for Psychological Distress in Healthcare Workers—A Systematic Review
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Obesity Status and Physical Fitness Levels in Male and Female Portuguese Adolescents: A Two-Way Multivariate Analysis

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(12), 6115; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20126115
by Samuel Encarnação 1,2,3,4,*, Filipe Rodrigues 5,6, António Miguel Monteiro 2,3, Hatem Gouili 7, Soukaina Hattabi 4,7,8, Andrew Sortwell 3,9, Luís Branquinho 3,4,8, José Eduardo Teixeira 2,3,10, Ricardo Ferraz 3,11, Pedro Flores 3,4,8, Sandra Silva-Santos 3,4,8,12,13, Joana Ribeiro 3,4,8, Amanda Batista 4,8 and Pedro Miguel Forte 2,3,4,8
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(12), 6115; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20126115
Submission received: 27 February 2023 / Revised: 26 April 2023 / Accepted: 9 June 2023 / Published: 13 June 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

General Comments

·         This study determined obesity and physical fitness levels of Portuguese adolescents through a multivariate analysis. It is interesting that the study documented significant gender and age main effect in most of the variables and a gender x age interaction effect in aerobic fitness. However, I do have some concerns, especially the results and discussion sections which are not properly presented.

·         There is also inadequacy of language command, particularly usage of correct grammar and spelling errors. This is the case throughout the manuscript.

·         Specific comments are presented below.

Specific Comments

Abstract

·         Lines 35 & 36: The sentence should read: association between gender and chronological age with obesity ….

·         Line 37: assessing, not accessing.

Introduction

·         The background information looks good, though verbose.

·         Page 2, Line 78: … socioeconomic may be one of the most …

Materials and Methods

2.1. Study participants

·         Page 3, Line 102: … association of power and age with obesity …

·         Provide information on sample size determination with a relevant formula.

·         Lines 117-123: After parental consent, minors only need to give assent and not consent again.

·         Page 3, Line 135: height was collected or measured?

·         Page 4, Lines 161-162: … the speed was slower, not lower

·         Page 4, Line 175-176: Confused sentence. Review the sentence please. Use participants instead of subjects.

·         Page 5, Line 192: Use restraining line instead of starting line.

·         Page 5, Line 209: … descriptive statistics were expressed as means …

·         Page 5, Line 231: The date 2013 is unnecessary. Delete it.

Results and Discussion

·         Pages 5 & 6: There is wrong use of statistical expressions. When there is a significant effect or difference, it should be written: P<0.05, and when there is no significant effect, it is P>0.05. Presentation should be properly done..

·         The gender x age significant interaction in aerobic fitness needs to be properly described.

·         Reporting of results is not logical and consistent.

·         Page 9, Line 363: Are BMI, abdominal circumference, aerobic fitness, and others independent variables?

·         The discussion is not well articulated, no comparison with previous studies. No information on whether findings were supported or not supported with previous studies.

·         One of the limitations of this study is the cross-sectional design which precluded determination of causality. This should be included.

Author Response

We appreciate your positive feedback. Point-by-point responses as provided, and revisions are tracked in the manuscript using the track change option in MS Word.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear,

please find the comments attached.

Sincerely,

reviewer

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We appreciate your positive feedback. Point-by-point responses as provided, and revisions are tracked in the manuscript using the track change option in MS Word.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The Discussion section needs to be improved upon.

Author Response

Review: The Discussion section needs to be improved upon.

Response 1: Dear reviewer. We very much appreciate your suggestions. Following your suggestions, we improved the discussion.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop