Next Article in Journal
The Role of Health Information Sources on Cervical Cancer Literacy, Knowledge, Attitudes and Screening Practices in Sub-Saharan African Women: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health (IECMH) and Early Childhood Intervention: Intentional Integration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Artisanal Gem Mining in Brazil: Evaluation of Oxidative Stress and Genotoxicity Biomarkers

by
Heberson Teixeira da Silva
1,
Thainá Sprícido Magalhães
1,
Sumaia Araújo Pires
1,2,
Ana Paula Rufino Santos
1,
Jairo Lisboa Rodrigues
1,* and
Márcia Cristina da Silva Faria
1
1
Instituto de Ciência, Engenharia e Tecnologia (ICET), Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Teófilo Otoni 39803-371, MG, Brazil
2
Departamento de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte 31270-901, MG, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(7), 871; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21070871
Submission received: 27 March 2024 / Revised: 26 June 2024 / Accepted: 28 June 2024 / Published: 3 July 2024

Abstract

:
This study was carried out in the district of Taquaral de Minas, in the municipality of Itinga, located in Jequitinhonha Valley, state of Minas Gerais, which is considered one of the largest yolk-producing regions in Brazil. Miners in gem extraction areas are prone to severe oxidative damage due to their increased exposure to toxic metals, as well as chemical, physical, and biological agents, resulting in diseases such as silicosis. Thus, this work aimed to evaluate occupational exposure in prospectors through biomonitoring techniques using a variety of biomarkers for oxidative stress, genotoxicity, and mutagenicity. Twenty-two miners and seventeen workers who were not occupationally exposed were recruited, totaling thirty-nine participants. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of the Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys. In this study, the levels of total peroxides, catalase activity, and microelements in plasma were evaluated. Additionally, environmental analysis was carried out through the Ames and Allium cepa tests. The results of the lipoperoxidation assessment were significant, with increased frequencies in exposed individuals compared to controls (p < 0.05), as determined by the Mann–Whitney test. Micronutrients in the blood showed lower concentrations in the group exposed to Fe and Se than in individuals not exposed to these elements. The results of the Ames test and Allium cepa test were statistically significant compared to the controls (p < 0.05), as determined by the Mann–Whitney test for genotoxicity and cytotoxicity. Thus, the results of the present study indicate possible environmental contamination and a potential risk to the health of miners, which suggests that further studies are important in the region.

1. Introduction

Mining is an ancient form of mineral extraction characterized by the high occupational exposure of workers and environmental degradation [1,2,3]. Prospectors in the mining sector are exposed to chemical, physical, and biological agents in the occupational environment, which can lead to the development and aggravation of occupational diseases, respiratory and neurological problems, and poisoning, developed over the course of their labor. Moreover, the environmental impacts of mining can be observed in the contamination of soil, air, and water by toxic metals [3,4].
The health of individuals and ecosystems exposed to toxic agents can be assessed using biomarkers. However, the validation of biological indicators requires particular attention to specificity and sensitivity, and these indicators can be used for various purposes, depending on the purpose of the study [5]. For instance, oxidative stress biomarkers are efficient for biological monitoring purposes and genotoxicity biomarkers, using the test organisms Allium cepa and Salmonella typhimurium, are suitable for environmental monitoring [6,7].
The occurrence of oxidative stress in the metabolic system is caused by an imbalance between oxidant and antioxidant compounds due to the intense generation of free radicals or to the inadequate speed of their removal from the metabolic system [8,9,10,11,12]. This imbalance is caused by several factors, such as food, chemical exposure, and physical, mechanical and biological agents. This process causes damage to biomolecules, resulting in the loss of their biological actions or even an imbalance in the body’s systems, being expressed through cell and tissue damage [13,14,15,16].
Miners in gem extraction areas in the district of Taquaral de Minas, in the municipality of Itinga, are exposed to toxic metals, as well as chemical, physical, and biological agents, in addition to working in unhealthy conditions [17]. These factors drive the generation of free radicals in these workers’ biological systems and can therefore be toxic. Furthermore, metals have a high accumulation power in living organisms, presenting risks of harm to human health, mainly because some metals, in addition to being easily absorbed by the body, are difficult to remove, accumulating in organs and tissues and causing cell changes, and consequently, mutations, of beneficial or harmful natures [18,19,20,21].
Biomarkers have a number of uses for different purposes. However, they also have specificities, allowing them to be differentiated from each other, thus requiring selectivity in the process of choosing a biomarker for analysis [5]. Thus, the ideal marker will be the one that can express certain pathologies in the community, so it is not necessary to select the best candidates to obtain the necessary information [22].
In addition to verifying the impact of mining activity on human health, assessing its damage to the environment is of interest. One environmental monitoring technique that has been used frequently, with international recognition, is the use of genotoxicity/mutagenicity biomarkers in the test organisms Allium cepa and Salmonella typhimurium [6,23]. Both tests are effective at evaluating the contamination of the soil by pollutants, as well as in other environments, making it possible to verify the cytotoxic, genotoxic, and mutagenic potential of the substances of interest. In addition, these tests are low-cost, fast, and efficient [6,7,23].
In this context, gem miners in the Jequitinhonha Valley are exposed to chemical, physical, mechanical, biological, ergonomic, and psychosocial factors that may be associated with the high presence of reactive oxygen species in the body [3,17]. Therefore, the quantitative study of biomarkers as a toxicological analysis tool becomes relevant as they can serve as instruments to determine the genesis of occupational diseases in these individuals, enabling effective disease control and prevention for populations facing similar forms of hazardous exposure [1,24].
Therefore, considering the real context of occupationally exposed workers (e.g., to crystalline silica, toxic metals, extreme work environments), this study aimed to investigate oxidative stress parameters (total peroxides in plasma and catalase activity) in plasma as potential early peripheral biomarkers for the monitoring of workers facing occupational exposure, as well as to carry out environmental monitoring (Allium cepa test and Ames test) of the studied region using test organisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Samples

In this study, 39 male participants were split into two groups. The group of workers not occupationally exposed comprised 17 men who worked in administrative positions in the city of Teófilo Otoni, Minas Gerais, Brazil, and did not have a history of occupational exposure to crystalline silica and toxic metals. The group of exposed workers consisted of 22 individuals who worked in the mining sector in the Taquaral de Minas district (Figure 1), located in the middle of Jequitinhonha, and who did not have a diagnosis of silicosis. More details about the characteristics of the studied population can be found in the work of Santos et al. (2023) [25].
Exposed workers were recruited by contacting a public establishment in the city, where community health agents helped gather information and invited workers to participate in the study.
The collection, transport, and storage of samples of biological specimens (e.g., blood and urine samples) and soil, soil dust, and stone dust were carried out as described by Santos (2018) [17] and Santos et al. (2023) [25]. Persons with chronic illnesses and those with <1 year of occupational exposure were excluded from the study. All participants completed a questionnaire on health status; lifestyle; drinking, smoking, and exercise habits; diet; medication use; and occupational activities [25].
Soil (SS), soil dust (P), and stone dust (PP) samples from rocks were collected within the five underground mines in the area: Bode (BOD), Pirineu (PIR), Pinheira (PIN), Lajedo (LAJ), and Marmita (MAR). First, a brush with nylon bristles (18 cm long) was used to remove earth dust and stone dust at depths of 0 to 10 cm. Soil sampling was carried out with a manual digging tool at depths of 0 to 20 cm. Three samples from each artisanal mine were collected at specific points: two of the dust samples were collected from the mine soils and one from the rock walls [17,25].
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of the Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys (UFVJM), according to opinion 3.692.758 and CAAE: 22164919.0.0000.5108. All participants were informed about the study and signed an informed consent form.

2.2. Oxidative Stress Biomarkers

2.2.1. Total Peroxides in Plasma

Plasma samples (200 μL) were added to 400 μL of thiobarbituric acid 1% m/v (solubilized in 50 mM NaOH (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)), 200 μL of 20% H3PO4 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 40 μL of 10 M NaOH (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 10 μL of 100 mM BTH (butylhydroxytoluene; Pharma Nostra, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). The solution was homogenized and heated at 85 °C for 20 min. After cooling to room temperature, 1.5 mL of butanol (Neon, Suzano, São Paulo, Brazil) was added. Then, the mixture was vortexed for about 2 min. The upper organic phase was collected, and the concentration was determined from the measurement of absorbance at 535 nm using a UV/visible spectrophotometer (Weblaborsp, São Paulo, Brazil, WUV-M51), as described by Faria (2015) [26]. The calibration curve was prepared with 1,1,3,3-tetramethoxypropan (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at concentrations of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 3.0, 7.0, 10.0, 12.5, 15.0, and 20 µM.

2.2.2. Determination of the Antioxidant Enzyme Catalase (CAT) Activity

The CAT activity was determined in plasma samples via absorbance decay, monitored using spectrophotometer readings. The enzymatic assay used to evaluate the catalase activity was performed using H2O2 ((Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA; 10 mM) as a substrate and a buffered medium, using potassium phosphate as the buffer (Êxodo científica, São Paulo, Brazil; pH 7.0; 50 mmol·L−1). As the reaction progressed, decomposition of H2O2 occurred via the action of the enzyme, and this process was detected by monitoring the decay of the monitored absorbance for 5 min via spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 240 nm, as described by Aebi (1984) [27].

2.3. Environmental Assessment through Genotoxicity and Mutagenicity Studies in Soil Samples

The samples were dried at room temperature until complete removal of moisture, and then, subjected to a shaker table procedure with a rotation speed of 115 rpm at 20 °C for 24 h in an aqueous solution at a soil-to-solvent ratio of 1:2 g·mL−1, according to Brazilian standards (NBR 10005) (ABNT, 2004). Following this, the solution was centrifuged at 13,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C. Then, it was vacuum-filtered with a 0.45 μm membrane to extract toxic compounds from the leached fraction [28].

2.3.1. Allium cepa Test

The Allium cepa test was conducted as described in previous studies, with some modifications [29,30,31], to analyze the cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and mutagenicity of soil samples. Seed germination was performed in individual Petri dishes with 3 mL of the extraction solution, previously sterilized in 10% nitric acid, and kept incubated for 5 days at a temperature of 28 ± 0.5 °C in a germination chamber (Fanem 347 CDG, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) containing the extraction solution obtained from soil samples from the regions studied. For the negative control (C−), ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ cm) was used. After 5 days of germination, the roots were measured and transferred to Eppendorf-type tubes containing Carnoy solution (75% ethanol (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 25% acetic acid (Isofar, São Paulo, Brazil)) for 24 h and stored at 4 °C in a refrigerator. Subsequently, the Carnoy solution was replaced by a 70% ethanol solution and samples were stored until the slides were made. Before slide preparation, the 70% ethanol was removed and the roots were washed 3 times with ultrapure water. Then, the water was replaced with 1 M HCl (Isofar, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) to carry out acid hydrolysis of the roots for 9 min in a water bath at 60 °C. Soon after, the roots were subjected to Schiff’s reagent (Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA) for two hours to carry out staining in the absence of light. At the time of preparation, the roots were transferred individually to the slide, and their coifs were cut and counterstained with a drop of 2% acetic carmine (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 8 min, followed by gentle maceration, for cell exposure and assembly using Entellan (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). In the analysis, 500 cells per slide were analyzed, totaling 5000 cells per point. The analysis parameters were as follows: chromosomal aberrations, determined by counting losses, breaks, bridges, and c-metaphase, among others; and micronuclei, determined by the frequency of micronuclei and chromosomal breaks. In the microscopic cytotoxicity analysis, mitotic cell divisions were observed for each sample, and the mitotic index (MI) was calculated using Equation (1), whereas for the macroscopic study, the inhibition rate (CTI) was used, calculated according to Equation (2). The total number of cells were scored.
M I = N u m b e r   o f   d i v i d i n g   c e l l s T o t a l   n u m b e r   o f   c e l l s   o b s e r v e d
C T I = ( A v e r a g e   r o o t   l e n g t h   o f   ( c ) A v e r a g e   r o o t   l e n g t h   o f   t h e   s a m p l e ) A v e r a g e   r o o t   l e n g t h   o f ( c ) × 100

2.3.2. Ames Test

The Ames test was performed according to the protocols established by Maron and Ames (1983) [32] and Hott et al. (2021) [30]. The TA98 and TA100 strains were isolated from previously prepared master plates and cultivated for 16 h in nutritive broth at 37 °C with shaking at 170 rpm in a shaker (Thermo Scientific MaxQ 6000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Before the spontaneous reversal test, histidine dependence and the presence of rfa mutations, uvrB deletions, and plasmid PKM101 were tested to ensure that the strains were suitable for the test. For the spontaneous reversal test, which was performed in triplicate, 0.1 M phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 (0.5 mL), bacterial culture (0.1 mL), and the samples under study were added to test tubes with lid screws, which were then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min before adding molten surface agar. The temperature was stabilized at 55 °C, and then, poured onto plates containing minimal agar. The metabolization test proceeded in the same way, only replacing the buffer with the same amount of the S9 mixture (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). For the negative controls, ultrapure water was used, and for the positive ones, agents that prove the reversion characteristics of each strain were used. The positive control mutagens used without metabolization for the two Salmonella typhimurium strains were nitroquinoline 4-N-oxide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for TA98, at 0.05 mL per plate, and sodium azide (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) at a concentration of 0.1 mL per plate for TA100. For the activation test, aminoanthracene (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as a positive control for both strains. The test strains used were obtained from MOLTOX and were stored at 4 °C until use. Then, the number of reverse colonies was counted. Statistical analysis was performed, and the mutagenicity ratio (MR) was calculated using Equation (3).
M R = N u m b e r   o f   R e v e r s e r s o n   T e s t   B o a r d N u m b e r   o f   R e v e r s e r s o n   C o n t r o l   B o a r d
A compound is considered mutagenic if it produces a reproducible increase in the number of reversible colonies that is higher than twice the number of spontaneous reversers, MR ≥  2. The analyses were performed in triplicate, and the statistical data were recorded using the Graph Pad Prism 8.0.2 software. The Mann–Whitney test was used to evaluate the significant difference between groups.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

In the static analysis, the Mann–Whitney test was applied to the test results (total peroxyls in plasma, total catalase activity, micronutrient levels, Allium cepa bioassay, and the Ames test) for comparison between the exposed and control groups. ANOVA tests were used to verify whether there were statistical differences according to the age of the individuals concerning the concentrations of total peroxides in plasma and total catalase activity, as well as to analyze the relationship between the studied mines for the samples analyzed in the Allium cepa bioassay. Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation and coefficient of determination (R2)) were used to evaluate the numerical results. An association was considered statistically significant when the p-value was less than 0.05. The software used to process and analyze statistical data were GraphPad Prism (GraphPad, version 8.0.2, La Jolla, CA, USA) and Microsoft Excel® (Microsoft Office 365, Washington, DC, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Total Peroxides in Plasma

The results of the analysis of the total peroxides in the plasma of the study participants are shown in Figure 2, using an aqueous calibration curve with a value of r2 = 0.999:
It can be seen in Figure 2 that the total peroxide results were statistically significant (p < 0.05), using the Mann–Whitney test, when compared to the control for individuals over 40 years old. The ANOVA test showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the study groups. Thus, through multiple comparisons, it was noted that individuals aged 20–30 and 30–40, when compared with those aged 40–50, 50–60, 60–70 and 70–80, showed statistically significant differences.
The values for peroxidation found may be linked to the lifestyle and dietary factors of individuals [9,33]. Santos et al. (2023) [25] reports in his study that workers are exposed to unhealthy working conditions in environments with high concentrations of metals and silica during the gem extraction process, and most workers in this sector are also smokers and consume alcohol. Such aspects are related to the lipoperoxidation of biomolecules [9,34]. In this context, Demirci-Cekic et al. (2022) [8] and Yang et al. (2022) [10] assert that alcohol and its toxic metabolites increase reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS), causing damage to vital organs. Additionally, the greatest oxidative damage was observed in the serum and erythrocyte membranes of patients with alcohol-related disorders, correlating with high levels of malondialdehyde (MDA). This reinforces the hypothesis that lifestyle factors, including alcohol and smoking, may exacerbate the detrimental effects of oxidative stress on workers exposed to unhealthy environmental conditions.
Another factor that corroborates the obtained results is occupational exposure to crystalline silica due to the drilling, extraction, and processing of minerals and the production and handling of materials containing silicon dioxide [35]. Contact between these particles and the lung parenchyma causes a constant local inflammatory reaction and oxidative damage, which can lead to an increase in the level of MDA, cell death, and DNA damage [1,36,37]. Furthermore, studies show that exposure to free radicals generated by crystalline silica damages biological membranes, triggering the process of lipid peroxidation, both in vitro and in vivo [1,37,38,39].
In accordance with the results obtained in this study, Nardi et al. (2018) [40] and Peruzzi et al. (2019) [1] demonstrate increased values for MDA in miners and in individuals exposed to silica. Similarly, significant increases in MDA levels were noted for gold miners over 40 years old when compared to the group that was not exposed [24,40]. Thus, the results presented in Figure 2 may indicate a possible exposure of this group of workers, as well as the potential development of future diseases in this group, as previous studies have reported a relationship between higher plasma levels of total peroxides and cardiovascular, liver, and neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and diabetes [41,42,43].

3.2. Total Catalase Activity

Catalase is an antioxidant enzyme involved in the neutralization of endoperoxides [44]. Its activity in the plasma of miners is high compared to the control group, as shown in Figure 3, but this difference was not statistically significant in all groups according to age.
CAT enzyme levels were increased in mining workers, which may be associated with their chronic exposure to xenobiotics, as well as due to the occupational conditions related to mineral extraction. In this sense, catalase is involved in the decomposition of endoperoxides from the normal cell metabolism, protecting the organism against radical species which would otherwise exert degrading and toxic effects on some cell types, such as erythrocytes [45,46,47].
The statistical analysis (p < 0.05) of the results shows that there was a significant difference in the activity of CAT when compared to the control group only in workers belonging to the 50–60 age group. Considering that this enzyme is an antioxidant produced by organisms in response to the excessive production of free radicals and that the occupational exposure of individuals is usually acute, CAT activity in other groups may be a reflection that the organism has not yet adapted to such conditions [48].
Catalase activity, although not statistically significant for some groups, is consistent with chronic exposure to contaminants, as well as occupational exposure, which will consequently lead to greater production of hydroperoxides in the cells. Many cells in the immune system can produce ROS, including alveolar macrophages, which play a fundamental role in the body’s defense against dust particles [40,49,50].
The microsomal metabolism of endogenous and xenobiotic compounds, including environmental pollutants, also has a role in the process of ROS formation. During the process of the phagocytosis of inhaled particles, superoxide radicals (O2•−) are generated, and their dismutation results in hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). In the presence of transition metal ions, such as ferrous ions or cuprous ions, H2O2 is converted to the potent oxidizing hydroxyl radical (OH) through the Fenton reaction. Thus, there is evidence that the inhalation of toxic occupational substances and environmental pollutants leads to excessive in vitro production and in vivo generation of OH radicals during phagocytosis [8,40,51,52].

3.3. Micronutrients

Micronutrients are necessary in trace amounts in the body and play essential roles in numerous biochemical and physiological processes. They are exogenous sources of antioxidants that protect DNA and other biomolecules from oxidative damage. Minerals such as selenium, zinc, copper, iron, and magnesium are considered antioxidants, as they each participate in some way in processes mitigating the effects of oxidative stress, act against the formation and neutralization of free radicals, and favor the repair and reconstitution of damaged biological structures [8,53]. Furthermore, the body’s antioxidant system has several antioxidant mechanisms that depend on the action of these minerals to prevent and combat the damage caused by oxidative stress [54]. Table 1 presents the values of these elements in the studied population as reported by Santos (2018) [17] and Santos et al. (2023) [25] and determined using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).
One hypothesis to explain the change in micronutrients in the study group compared to the unexposed controls would be the difference in the consumption of the main sources of exogenous antioxidants. Thus, the decrease in the availability of these minerals affects metalloenzymes, which are important components of antioxidant defense. For example, it is known that superoxide dismutase is dependent on copper, zinc, and manganese, as well as selenium catalase [8,10].
The reduction in these minerals that participate in the antioxidant defense mechanism may have left the lungs of these individuals more susceptible to oxidative attack, resulting in an inflammatory response and respiratory diseases, such as silicosis. The lungs of miners are constantly exposed to reactive oxygen species or free radicals through the inhalation of crystalline silica. Therefore, there is an imbalance between the production and elimination of radical species, exacerbating oxidative stress and leading to consequent apoptosis and production of local chemotactic molecules, increasing vascular permeability and the inflammatory process [55,56].
The individuals from the 30–40, 40–50, 50–60, 60–70 and 70–80 age groups showed lower mean serum levels of minerals when compared to the control group. Therefore, it is noteworthy that one of the main functions of Se is its antioxidant potential, acting as a cofactor of glutathione and glutathione peroxidase in conjunction with catalase [57]. So, the levels of this enzyme decrease in Se-deficient organisms, and Se supplementation restores its normal activity [58]. In addition, Se strengthens the immune system, exerting preventive effects against diseases such as cancer, atherosclerosis, arthritis, stroke, cirrhosis, and emphysema, in addition to combating poisoning from toxic metals [53,59].
Although not statistically significant, the zinc value in the miner group is below the mean level. Studies report that the deficiency of this element may be associated with a diet deficiency or due to excessive alcohol consumption [60,61]. Zinc acts in the strengthening of cell membranes and protects the liver against possible damage caused by free radicals; therefore, its absence can cause a series of neurological disorders [62,63].
For the copper value, there is a lower mean value for the exposed miners in the 30–40 and 50–60 age groups when compared to the control group; for the other age groups, there is a small decrease, but without statistical significance. This may be associated with the reduction in Zn [60]. This micronutrient is essential for many enzymes that help break down or build tissues in the body; in addition, it is necessary in the production of RNA, protection against the oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids and in helping to maintain healthy cell membranes. A lack of copper in the body weakens the immune system [60].
The mean value of Fe showed statistical differences for the 50–60 and 70–80 age groups. This micronutrient is an essential constituent of several proteins, including enzymes, cytochromes, myoglobin, and hemoglobin. Thus, some studies suggest that deficiency in this mineral predisposes individuals to infections [64]. However, in the presence of ions of this element, products from lipid peroxidation can be rapidly amplified, potentiating cell damage [65].

3.4. Evaluation of Cytotoxicity, Genotoxicity and Mutagenicity by the Allium cepa Bioassay

3.4.1. Cytotoxicity Analysis

The cytotoxicity of soil samples (soil (SS), soil dust (P), stone dust (PP)) was studied using the mitotic index (MI), inhibition rate (CTI), and microscopic and macroscopic parameters, characterized by the total number of cells in mitosis. This metric was used because root growth is driven by the frequency of cell division in the tissue, and the decrease or increase in the number or rate of dividing cells can be correlated with the toxic effect of a substance [66].
Table 2 presents some parameters used in the cytotoxicity study. The values for the mitotic indices show that there are statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the negative controls and the PIR P, PIR PP, PIN PP, MAR P, and MAR PP, samples according to the Mann–Whitney test. The other samples in the study showed mean values for the MIs that were numerically greater than the negative controls (Figure 4). MIs statistically higher than the negative controls may indicate alterations in the growth and development of the exposed organism resulting from chemical exposure. The consequences of this exposure are increased cell division, which can be harmful to cells, leading to disordered proliferation and even the formation of tumor tissues [67].
As described in the study carried out by Santos et al. (2023) [25] and presented in summary form in Figure 5, the regions studied presented high values of metals in the soil, exceeding limitations set by current national and international legislation [17,25]. This fact may be related to the statistical differences observed for the MI, as the presence of metals in high concentrations in the soil can cause an increase in the MI and reflect the cytotoxicity that directly affects growth and root elongation. A decline in this parameter compared to the negative control can cause cell death and other lethal effects in the body [23].
Corroborating the results obtained in the cytotoxicity study, Leme and Marin-Morales (2009) [67] describe the relationship between metal concentrations and MI, where a higher metal concentration tends to indicate a higher cytotoxicity in the sample. Thus, the change in the MI of Allium cepa meristem cells suggests that the presence of high concentrations of heavy metals in the soil caused cytotoxic effects in the test organism under investigation. In this same context, Carruyo et al. (2008) [68] and Chandra et al. (2005) [23] report that due to the presence of toxic metals, changes in root growth and mitotic index were observed.
Figure 6 presents the mean values for root growth. Bonciu et al. (2018) [6] state that this indicator is considered the most important macroscopic parameter in the Allium cepa test, as data on germination provide information on the lethality of the analyzed substance. Furthermore, root growth is associated with MI and is the main cytotoxicity parameter in Allium cepa. The BOD P, BOD PP, BOD SS, PIR P, PIR PP, PIR SS, PIN P, LAJ SS, and MAR SS samples showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) when compared to the negative controls using the Mann–Whitney test. These results may be correlated with the high concentration of metals found in the region’s soil, since, as described by Cunha Neto et al. (2003) [69], the presence of toxic metals can inhibit root growth in this bioassay.

3.4.2. Analysis of Genotoxicity and Mutagenicity

To study the genotoxicity and mutagenicity, chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei were observed, respectively. Chromosomal aberrations are characterized by structural changes at different stages of cell division that can occur spontaneously or as a result of exposure to contaminants. On the other hand, an increased number of micronuclei may indicate the existence of a mutagenic substance, being the result of alterations to chromosomes and the mitotic process resulting from acentric fragments or entire chromosomes that were not incorporated into the main nucleus during the cell division cycle.
Quantitative analyses of the various chromosomal aberrations (Figure 7) are summarized in Table 3 and Figure 8, with the following abnormalities found in the study: bridging, breakage, cormosonic loss, sticking, c-metaphase, and micronuclei.
Statistical analysis revealed that the frequencies of chromosomal aberrations for the BOD P, BOD PP, PIR P, PIR PP, PIR SS, PIN P, PIN PP, PIN SS, LAJ P, LAJ PP, LAJ SS, MAR PP, and MAR SS samples differed significantly (p < 0.05) when compared to the negative controls, as determined using the Mann–Whitney test in the genotoxicity analysis (Table 3 and Figure 8). On the other hand, there was no statistical change (p < 0.05) in the mutagenicity analysis (Table 3 and Figure 7), although it is noted that, numerically, the micronuclei values are very high compared to the positive control.
Chromosomal aberrations in the Allium cepa test are used to predict the mechanism of action of xenobiotics, such as toxic metals, in biological systems, recognized as important consequences of the actions of these chemical agents in living organisms. High frequencies of chromosomal aberrations have been correlated with a significant risk of developing cancer. Furthermore, such cellular anomalies can cause problems in the reproductive processes of organisms, such as an increase in germ cells and genetic diseases that can be transmitted to later generations [6,66,69,70].
The significant induction of chromosomal aberrations, including the formation of micronuclei, indicates the genotoxic and mutagenic potential of the soil samples under study. Tabassum and Pandey (2021) [71] state that the presence of metals can induce chromosomal breaks, fragments, and micronuclei formation in plant and mammalian test systems. From this perspective, Santos et al. (2023) [25] observed high concentrations of some metals present in the region’s soil, justifying the presence of such anomalies.
In line with the results obtained, Wierzbicka (1999) [72], Achary et al. (2008) [73], and Datta et al. (2018) [74] report in their studies that the presence of toxic metals is associated with genetic alterations. There is also a connection between the abnormalities found and the contaminant present in the sample. For instance, the presence of toxic metals (e.g., Al, Cr, Pb, Cu, Mg, Co, Zi, Mn, Ni, Cd, Hg) is related to c-metaphase, chromosomal bridges, giant cells, and viscosity, occurring mainly in soils with higher metal concentrations. Importantly, there are two ways in which toxic metals can induce genotoxicity: one is cross-linking with DNA and/or protein and the other is the generation of reactive oxygen species [6,23,75].
Toxic substances, such as metals, contaminating the environment may not show acute effects on exposed organisms but may cause reduced survival [76,77], tissue damage, genetic damage to somatic and germ cells, the accumulation of persistent contaminants, and the occurrence of neoplasms. Changes in the cell division index and genetic material can be harmful to an organism and induce severe and irreversible consequences to human or animal health [78,79].
The formation of micronuclei is usually the result of chromosomal breaks/fragments or an anomalous disjunction of chromosomes in the anaphase stage of the cell cycle. Therefore, the presence of micronuclei can be used to assess the effect of clastogenic and aneugenic parameters, revealing the mutagenic action that may or may not be associated with neoplastic transformations. A high value of this anomaly indicates the aneugenic effect resulting from a chromosomal loss and, when reduced, may indicate a clastogenic action resulting from a break in the chromosome. Thus, micronuclei are related to genetic anomalies that can reveal genetic syndromes and autosomal trisomies in humans [6,75].
Although the values for micronuclei (Table 3) do not present statistical significance, it is numerically verified that they are increased compared to the negative controls. Thus, chronic exposure over the span of years can cause damage to human health, in addition to chronic environmental effects. Moreover, interactions between metals or other elements, even at low levels, can have synergistic or additive actions [76].
Table 4 presents the results of the ANOVA/multiple comparisons test carried out between the mines. It is possible to verify that, for the analyzed parameters, only the chromosomal aberrations and the mean growth of the roots showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) when comparing the samples, as shown in Table 4. Such changes may be due to regional variation in the soil composition, leading to the distinct values of certain elements. Furthermore, there may be changes in the concentrations of elements along their horizons.

3.5. Ames Test

Micronutrients and mutagenic activities in the absence and presence of the S9 fraction were analyzed by calculating the MR from the statistical analyses (Graph Pad Prism 8.0.2 software), as shown in Table 5 and summarized in Figure 9 and Figure 10.
According to the results, it was found that all samples have an MR greater than or equal to 2 for both strains. Furthermore, statistical analyses confirmed the mutagenic potential of the samples under study, with a p-value < 0.05.
These results may be due to the presence of high levels of metals, as reported by Santos (2018) [17], because, in the inorganic fraction of the soil, toxic metals are a class of priority compounds in the definition of probable contaminants of anthropogenic or geological origin. These chemical elements can occur in natural environments and are essential to living beings, but in excessive amounts, they can be toxic or powerfully mutagenic, carcinogenic, and teratogenic agents [19,80].
Another factor that can justify the genotoxic effects in the samples is the presence of free radicals coming from silica and certain metals found in high concentrations [81]. The presence of these elements can destroy or react with practically all biological molecules, both in unicellular and multicellular organisms, inducing chromosomal aberrations, mutations, and exchanges of sister chromatids. In bacteria, the targets of radical species are lipids, proteins, DNA, and RNA. In DNA, reactive species act by causing lesions such as alterations or the removal of nitrogenous bases, causing mutations in the affected organisms [80,82].
Corroborating the results of the Ames test, some studies have investigated the mutagenic effects of some radical species on different strains of salmonella, including TA100 and TA98, using the pre-incubation method and board incorporation to determine the toxic potential of these substances [83,84].

4. Conclusions

In general, it can be stated that, for the enzymatic antioxidant catalase, there was an inhibition of its activity in all the examined groups (p < 0.05). Similarly, significant differences in the lipid peroxidation results were obtained when compared to the unexposed group (p < 0.05), demonstrating that individuals exposed to mining environments face greater oxidative stress. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that oxidative effects may be associated with enhancing the development of cancer as a chronic occupational disease resulting from exposure to contaminants found in the mining environment. Despite the limitations of this study, such as the limited number of participants, the results provide a useful overview of the mechanisms of exposure in this mining environment.
Analyzing the micronutrients, it was found that the group of prospectors had lower mean copper and selenium concentrations than the negative controls. Thus, the decrease in mineral availability in these individuals negatively affected the activity of metalloenzymes such as catalase, important components in the antioxidant defense response.
The Allium cepa and Salmonella/microsome tests showed that the soil samples had cytotoxic and genotoxic potential; this was due to the presence of toxic compounds present in the soil. Although the number of micronuclei was not statistically significant in the mutagenicity test, numerically increased values were found, so prolonged exposure can be harmful to the exposed organisms, especially given the mutagenic potential of the samples revealed by the Ames test. Thus, the results of this study reinforce the need to include the Salmonella/microsome assay in health risk assessments related to exposure to contaminated soil.

Author Contributions

All authors (H.T.d.S., T.S.M., A.P.R.S., S.A.P., M.C.d.S.F. and J.L.R.) contributed to the experiments and all stages of the writing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the PPSUS (FAPEMIG APQ-04354-17), Minas Gerais Research Foundation (FAPEMIG, APQ-02401-22 and APQ-03260-17), and the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). The study was conducted at the UFVJM.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Research Ethics Committee of the UFVJM on 27 September 2019 (protocol number 3.692.758).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. The identity of all volunteers was kept confidential.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Federal University of the Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valley (UFVJM), the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), the Foundation for Research Support of the State of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and the Coordination of Improvement of Higher-Level Personnel (CAPES) for the financial support and fellowships.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Peruzzi, C.; Nascimento, S.; Gauer, B.; Nardi, J.; Sauer, E.; Göethel, G.; Garcia, S.C. Inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers at protein and molecular levels in workers occupationally exposed to crystalline silica. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 1394–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Santos, A.P.R.; Pêgo, J.S. Riscos Associados aos Garimpos de Gemas no Povoado de Taquaral, Itinga, MG: Dois Contextos Dilemáticos; IFNMG: Araçuaí, Brazil, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Santos, A.P.R.; Pego, J.S.; Muniz, E.O. Contextualização dos impactos ambientais em áreas de extração de gemas do Povoado de Taquaral, Itinga (MG). Rev. Agrogeoambiental 2016, 8, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stewart, A.G. Mining is bad for health: A voyage of discovery. Environ. Geochem. Health 2020, 42, 1153–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Amorim, L.C.A. Biomarkers for evaluating exposure to chemical agents present in the environment. Rev. Bras. De Epidemiol. 2003, 6, 158–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bonciu, E.; Firbas, P.; Fontanetti, C.S.; Wusheng, J.; Karaismailoğlu, M.C.; Liu, D.; Menicucci, F.; Pesnya, D.S.; Popescu, I.A.; Romanovsky, A.V.; et al. An evaluation for the standardization of the Allium cepa test as cytotoxicity and genotoxicity assay. Caryologia 2018, 71, 191–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tagliari, K.C.; Cecchini, R.; Saridakis, H.O. Teste de ames como uma ferramenta para detecção de citotoxidade e mutagenicidade causadas por metais pesados e radicais livres. Semin. Ciências Biológicas E Da Saúde 1999, 18, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Demirci-Cekic, S.; Özkan, G.; Avan, A.N.; Uzunboy, S.; Çapanoğlu, E.; Apak, R. Biomarkers of oxidative stress and antioxidant defense. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2022, 209, 114477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Vona, R.; Gambardella, L.; Cittadini, C.; Straface, E.; Pietraforte, D. Biomarkers of oxidative stress in metabolic syndrome and associated diseases. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 8267234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yang, M.; Zhou, X.; Tan, X.; Huang, X.; Yuan, L.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Xu, M.; Wan, Y.; Li, Z. The status of oxidative stress in patients with alcohol dependence: A meta-analysis. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lu, C.; Luo, J.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X. The oxidative stress responses caused by phthalate acid esters increases mRNA abundance of base excision repair (BER) genes in vivo and in vitro. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Garcia-Caparros, P.; Filippis, L.; Gul, A.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Ozturk, M.; Altay, V.; Lao, M.T. Oxidative stress and antioxidant metabolism under adverse environmental conditions: A review. Bot. Rev. 2021, 87, 421–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liguori, I.; Russo, G.; Curcio, F.; Bulli, G.; Aran, L.; Della-Morte, D.; Gargiulo, G.; Testa, G.; Cacciatore, F.; Bonaduce, D.; et al. Estresse oxidativo, envelhecimento e doenças. Interv. Clínicas No Envelhec. 2018, 13, 757–772. [Google Scholar]
  14. Polidori, M.C.; Mecocci, P. Modeling the dynamics of energy imbalance: The free radical theory of aging and frailty revisited. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2022, 181, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jiang, S.; Liu, H.; Li, C. Dietary regulation of oxidative stress in chronic metabolic diseases. Foods 2021, 10, 1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jomova, K.; Raptova, R.; Alomar, S.Y.; Alwasel, S.H.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K.; Valko, M. Reactive oxygen species, toxicity, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: Chronic diseases and aging. Arch. Toxicol. 2023, 97, 2499–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Santos, A.P.R. Dissertação de Mestrado. UFVJM. Available online: http://acervo.ufvjm.edu.br/jspui/bitstream/1/1929/1/ana_paula_rufino_santos.pdf (accessed on 30 July 2021).
  18. Câmara, V.D.M.; Filhote, M.I.D.F.; Lima, M.I.M.; Alheira, F.V.; Martins, M.S.; Dantas, T.O.; Luiz, R.R. Methodology to prevent mercury exposure among adolescents from goldmine areas in Mariana, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Cad. De Saúde Pública 1996, 12, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chang, L.W.; Cockerham, L. Toxic metals in the environment. In Basic Environmental Toxicology, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ferrari, C.K. Functional foods, herbs and nutraceuticals: Towards biochemical mechanisms of healthy aging. Biogerontology 2004, 5, 275–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fu, Z.; Xi, S. The effects of heavy metals on human metabolism. Toxicol. Mech. Methods 2020, 30, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gil, F.; Pla, A. Biomarkers as biological indicators of xenobiotic exposure. J. Appl. Toxicol. Int. J. 2001, 21, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chandra, S.; Chauhan, L.K.S.; Murthy, R.C.; Saxena, P.N.; Pande, P.N.; Gupta, S.K. Comparative biomonitoring of leachates from hazardous solid waste of two industries using Allium test. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 347, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Anlar, H.G.; Bacanli, M.; İritaş, S.; Bal, C.; Kurt, T.; Tutkun, E.; Yilmaz, H.; Basaran, N. Effects of occupational silica exposure on oxidative stress and immune system parameters in ceramic workers in Turkey. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 2017, 80, 688–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Santos, A.P.R.; Silva, L.Z.; Freire, B.M.; da Silva Faria, M.C.; Batista, B.L.; Rocha, B.A.; Barbosa, F., Jr.; Rodrigues, J.L. Artisanal Gem Mining in Brazil: A Source of Genotoxicity and Exposure to Toxic Elements. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Faria, M.C.S.; Santos, N.A.; Rodrigues, M.A.C.; Rodrigues, J.L.; Junior, F.B.; Santos, A.C. Effect of diabetes on biodistribution, nephrotoxicity and antitumor activity of cisplatin in mice. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2015, 229, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Aebi, H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzym. 1984, 105, 121–126. [Google Scholar]
  28. Silva, F.M.R.J.; Rocha, J.A.V.; Vargas, V.M.F. Extraction parameters in the mutagenicity assay of soil samples. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 6017–6023. [Google Scholar]
  29. Grant, W.F. Chromosome aberration assays in Allium: A report of the US Environmental Protection Agency gene-tox program. Mutat. Res. Rev. Genet. Toxicol. 1982, 99, 273–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hott, R.C.; Magalhães, T.S.; Maia, L.F.; Santos, K.S.; Rodrigues, G.L.; Oliveira, L.C.; Pereira, M.C.; Faria, M.C.S.; Carli, A.P.; Alves, C.C.S.; et al. Purification of arsenic-contaminated water using iron molybdate filters and monitoring of their genotoxic, mutagenic, and cytotoxic effects through bioassays. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 5714–5730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mourão, A.O.; Silva, D.F.; Rodriguez, M.; Torres, T.S.; Franco, E.S.; Pádua, V.L.; Faria, M.C.S.; Maia, L.F.O.; Rodrigues, J.L. Degradation of haloacetic acids with the Fenton-like and analysis by GC-MS: Use of bioassays for monitoring of genotoxic, mutagenic and cytotoxic effects. Env. Monit Assess 2019, 191, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Maron, D.M.; Ames, B.N. Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat. Res. Environ. Mutagen. Relat. Subj. 1983, 113, 173–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sapkota, M.; Burnham, E.L.; Vasure, J.M.; Sweeter, J.M.; Hunter, C.D.; Duryee, M.J.; Klassen, L.W.; Kharbanda, K.K.; Sisson, J.H.; Thiele, G.M.; et al. Malondialdehyde–Acetaldehyde (MAA) Protein Adducts Are Found Exclusively in the Lungs of Smokers with Alcohol Use Disorders and Are Associated with Systemic Anti-MAA Antibodies. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2017, 41, 2093–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mure, K.; Tomono, S.; Mure, M.; Horinaka, M.; Mutoh, M.; Sakai, T.; Ishikawa, H.; Wakabayashi, K. The combination of cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption synergistically increases reactive carbonyl species in human male plasma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 16, 9043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bhagia, L.J. Non-occupational exposure to silica dust. Indian J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2012, 16, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Satpathy, S.R.; Jala, V.R.; Bodduluri, S.R.; Krishnan, E.; Hegde, B.; Hoyle, G.W.; Fraig, M.; Luster, A.D.; Haribabu, B. Crystalline silica-induced leukotriene B 4-dependent inflammation promotes lung tumour growth. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Marques Da Silva, V.; Benjdir, M.; Montagne, P.; Pairon, J.C.; Lanone, S.; Andujar, P. Pulmonary toxicity of silica linked to its micro-or nanometric particle size and crystal structure: A review. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guidi, P.; Nigro, M.; Bernardeschi, M.; Lucchesi, P.; Scarcelli, V.; Frenzilli, G. Does the crystal habit modulate the genotoxic potential of silica particles? A cytogenetic evaluation in human and murine cell lines. Mutat. Res./Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2015, 792, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. OSHA. Occupational Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica—Review of Health Effects Literature and Preliminary Quantitative Risk Assessment; OSHA: Tumwater, WA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  40. Nardi, J.; Nascimento, S.; Göethel, G.; Gauer, B.; Sauer, E.; Fão, N.; Cestonaroa, L.; Peruzzia, C.; Souza, J.; Garcia, S.C. Inflammatory and oxidative stress parameters as potential early biomarkers for silicosis. Clínica Chim. Acta 2018, 484, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Amato, A.A.; Rosa, E.C.C.C.; Santos, R.R.C.; Neves, F.D.A.R.; Gris, E.F.; Ferreira, E.A.; Coelho, M.S. Evaluation of oxidative stress and lipoperoxidation (OLP) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) treated at the University Hospital of Brasília (HUB). Braz. J. Health Rev. 2019, 2, 4236–4256. [Google Scholar]
  42. Malaei, R.; Ramezani, A.M.; Absalan, G. Analysis of malondialdehyde in human plasma samples through derivatization with 2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazine by ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction-GC-FID approach. J. Chromatogr. B 2018, 1089, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nikitina, O.A. Activity of Lipoperoxidation–Antioxidant Protection Reactions in Patients with HIV Infection. Acta Biomed. Sci. 2021, 5, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Moldogazieva, N.T.; Mokhosoev, I.M.; Feldman, N.B.; Lutsenko, S.V. ROS and RNS signalling: Adaptive redox switches through oxidative/nitrosative protein modifications. Free. Radic. Res. 2018, 52, 507–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Khan, K.; Rafiq, M.T.; Bacha, A.U.R.; Nabi, I.; Irshad, M.; Faridullah, F.; Younas, M.; Daud Khan, M.; Aziz, R.; Amin, M.; et al. Assessment of heavy metals and associated oxidative stress in occupationally exposed workers from Bannu and Karak Districts in Pakistan. Environ. Geochem. Health 2023, 45, 5915–5925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pierezan, B.; Webber, B.; Vidmar, M.F.; Martins, C.A.D.Q.; Almeida, C.R.D.; Siqueira, L.D.O. Analysis of the oxidative profile of different biological samples of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Fisioter. E Pesqui. 2017, 24, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Martemucci, G.; Costagliola, C.; Mariano, M.; D’andrea, L.; Napolitano, P.; D’Alessandro, A.G. Free radical properties, source and targets, antioxidant consumption and health. Oxygen 2022, 2, 48–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jomova, K.; Alomar, S.Y.; Alwasel, S.H.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K.; Valko, M. Several lines of antioxidant defense against oxidative stress: Antioxidant enzymes, nanomaterials with multiple enzyme-mimicking activities, and low-molecular-weight antioxidants. Arch. Toxicol. 2024, 98, 1323–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Altin, R.; Armutcu, F.; Kart, L.; Gurel, A.; Savranlar, A.; Özdemir, H. Antioxidant response at early stages and low grades of simple coal worker’s pneumoconiosis diagnosed by high resolution computed tomography. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2004, 207, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Tapak, M.; Sadeghi, S.; Ghazanfari, T.; Mosaffa, N. Chemical exposure and alveolar macrophages responses: The role of pulmonary defense mechanism in inhalation injuries. BMJ Open Respir. Res. 2023, 10, e001589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Madkour, L.H. Function of reactive oxygen species (ROS) inside the living organisms and sources of oxidants. Pharm. Sci. Anal. Res. J. 2019, 2, 180023. [Google Scholar]
  52. Vallyathan, V.; Mega, J.F.; Shi, X.; Dalal, N.S. Enhanced generation of free radicals from phagocytes induced by mineral dusts. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1992, 6, 404–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Nascimento, A.P.S.; Maciel, E.; Ibiapina, C.R.L.S.; Moura, M.C. Implications of serum selenium concentrations on inflamatory bowel diseases: A bibliographic review. Electron. J. Collect. Health 2020, 12, 2101. [Google Scholar]
  54. Amin, M.N.; Siddiqui, S.A.; Uddin, M.G.; Ibrahim, M.D.; Uddin, S.N.; Adnan, M.T.; Rahaman, M.Z.; Kar, A.; Islam, M.S. Increased oxidative stress, altered trace elements, and macro-minerals are associated with female obesity. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 197, 384–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, Z.; Ren, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chuang, C.C.; Kandaswamy, E.; Zhou, T.; Zuo, L. Role of ROS and nutritional antioxidants in human diseases. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kawasaki, H. A mechanistic review of silica-induced inhalation toxicity. Inhal. Toxicol. 2015, 27, 363–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Papp, L.V.; Holmgren, A.; Khanna, K.K. Selenium and Selenoproteins in Health and Disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2010, 12, 793–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sitta, A.; Vanzin, C.S.; Biancini, G.B.; Manfredini, V.; Oliveira, A.B.; Wayhs, C.A.Y.; Vargas, C.R. Evidence that L-carnitine and selenium supplementation reduces oxidative stress in phenylketonuric patients. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2011, 31, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Tinggi, U. Selenium: Its role as antioxidant in human health. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2008, 13, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Oliveira, F.M.D.; Barbosa Júnior, F.; Júnior, A.A.J.; Foss, N.T.; Navarro, A.M.; Frade, M.A.C. Estresse oxidativo e micronutrientes na hanseníase. Rev. Nutr. 2015, 28, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tonel, D.; Silva, T.O.; Lazarotto, A.K.; Muller, D.A.; Lucca, L.D.; Ichikawa, T.T.D.; Gallina, A.L. Avaliação do status oxidativo, consumo alimentar de zinco e zinco plasmático em indivíduos infectados pelo HIV. Rev. Bras. Análises Clínicas 2018, 50, 153–160. [Google Scholar]
  62. Valla, F.V.; Bost, M.; Roche, S.; Pitance, M.; Cuerq, C.; Ridout, J.; Ecochard, R.; Ginhoux, T.; Bellon, A.; Ford-Chessel, C.; et al. Multiple micronutrient plasma level changes are related to oxidative stress intensity in critically ill children. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 19, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Viana, A.C.C.; Maia, F.M.M.; Carvalho, N.S.D.; Morais, S.R.D.; Bezerra, A.N.; Mendonça, P.D.S.; Costa, S.L.D.; Daltro, A.F.C.S. Correlation between nutritional assessment and oxidative stress in candidates for liver transplant. Einstein 2019, 18, eAO4039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kumar, N.; Chugh, H.; Sood, D.; Singh, S.; Singh, A.; Awasthi, A.D.; Tomar, R.; Tomar, V.; Chandra, R. Biology of heme: Drug interactions and adverse drug reactions with CYP450. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 2042–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Campos, M.T.G.; Leme, F.D.O.P. Oxidative stress: Pathophysiology and laboratory diagnosis. Pubvet 2017, 12, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  66. Admas, T.; Kerisew, B. Assessment of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity potential of effluents from Bahir Dar Tannery using Allium cepa. Adv. Public Health 2022, 2022, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Leme, D.M.; Marin-Morales, M.A. Allium cepa test in environmental monitoring: A review on its application. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 2009, 682, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Carruyo, I.; Fernández, Y.; Marcano, L.; Montiel, X.; Torrealba, Z. Correlation of toxicity with lead content in root tip cells (Allium cepa L.). Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2008, 125, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cunha Neto, A.R.; Silva, I.G.; Calvelli, J.V.B.; Martins, G.E.C.; Carvalho, M.; Barbosa, S. Toxicity of heavy metals that affect germination, development and cell cycle of Allium cepa L. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2023, 111, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Moura, J.F.; Silva, M.S.; Batista, N.J.C.; Uchoa, V.T.; Alves, W.S. Study the Genotoxicity Of Extract Abelmoschus Esculentus (Okra) By Test Allium cepa. Saúde Foco 2014, 1, 15–28. [Google Scholar]
  71. Tabassum, J.A.S.; Pandey, D. Metal induced genotoxicity and oxidative stress in plants, assessment methods, and role of various factors in genotoxicity regulation. In Induced Genotoxicity and Oxidative Stress in Plants; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 133–149. [Google Scholar]
  72. Wierzbicka, M. The effect of lead on the cell cycle in the root meristem of Allium cepa L. Protoplasma 1999, 207, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Achary, V.M.M.; Jena, S.; Panda, K.K.; Panda, B.B. Aluminium induced oxidative stress and DNA damage in root cells of Allium cepa L. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008, 70, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Datta, S.; Singh, J.; Singh, J.; Singh, S.; Singh, S. Assessment of genotoxic effects of pesticide and vermicompost treated soil with Allium cepa test. Sustain. Environ. Res. 2018, 28, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sabeen, M.; Mahmood, Q.; Bhatti, Z.A.; Irshad, M.; Bilal, M.; Hayat, M.T.; Usman, I.; Tahir, A.A.; Muhammad, A.; Shahid, N. Allium cepa assay based comparative study of selected vegetables and the chromosomal aberrations due to heavy metal accumulation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 1368–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Reddy, K.R.; Chirakkara, R.A.; Ribeiro, L.F.M. Synergistic Co-contaminant Effects on Phytoremediation of Polluted Soils. Indian Geotech. J. 2024, 54, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Matos, A.R.; Faria, M.C.S.; Freire, B.M.; Pereira, R.M.; Batista, B.L.; Rodrigues, J.L. Determination of 14 trace elements in blood, serum and urine after environmental disaster in the Doce River basin: Relationship between mining waste and metal concentration in the population. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2022, 70, 126920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Abubacker, M.N.; Sathya, C. Genotoxic Effect of Heavy Metals Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn Using Allium Cepa L. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia 2017, 14, 1181–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Galindo, T.; Silva, E.; Rosário, I. Indução de micronúcleos e toxicidade por efluente doméstico em duas populações de Bathygobius soporator (Valenciennes, 1837) (Teleostei, Gobbidae) no Litoral de Salvador (BA), Brasil. Braz. J. Aquat. Sci. Technol. 2012, 16, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Xiong, J.; Yuan, B.F.; Feng, Y.Q. Mass spectrometry for investigating the effects of toxic metals on nucleic acid modifications. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2019, 32, 808–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Demir, E.; Castranova, V. Genotoxic effects of synthetic amorphous silica nanoparticles in the mouse lymphoma assay. Toxicol. Rep. 2016, 3, 807–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kopp, B.; Zalko, D.; Audebert, M. Genotoxicity of 11 heavy metals detected as food contaminants in two human cell lines. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2018, 59, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Cadet, J.; Wagner, J.R. DNA base damage by reactive oxygen species, oxidizing agents, and UV radiation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5, a012559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cooke, M.S.; Evans, M.D.; Dizdaroglu, M.; Lunec, J. Oxidative DNA damage: Mechanisms, mutation, and disease. FASEB J. 2003, 17, 1195–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the study area in the municipality of Itinga, district of Taquaral de Minas, Brazil.
Figure 1. Location of the study area in the municipality of Itinga, district of Taquaral de Minas, Brazil.
Ijerph 21 00871 g001
Figure 2. Representation of average values of total peroxides in miners from the Taquaral district and in participants from the control group. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) for samples when compared to the control (C).
Figure 2. Representation of average values of total peroxides in miners from the Taquaral district and in participants from the control group. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) for samples when compared to the control (C).
Ijerph 21 00871 g002
Figure 3. Quantification of mean values of enzyme catalase activity in miners from the Taquaral district and in the control group. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences for (p < 0.05) samples when compared to the control (C).
Figure 3. Quantification of mean values of enzyme catalase activity in miners from the Taquaral district and in the control group. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences for (p < 0.05) samples when compared to the control (C).
Ijerph 21 00871 g003
Figure 4. Results of mitotic index values, expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) for samples when compared to the negative control (C−). Abbreviations: BOD = Bode; PIR = Pirineu; PIN = Pinheira; LAJ = Lajedo, MAR = Marmita.
Figure 4. Results of mitotic index values, expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) for samples when compared to the negative control (C−). Abbreviations: BOD = Bode; PIR = Pirineu; PIN = Pinheira; LAJ = Lajedo, MAR = Marmita.
Ijerph 21 00871 g004
Figure 5. Toxic metals above the levels allowed by national (COPAM—State Council for Environmental Policy and CETESB—Environmental Company of the State of São Paulo) and international (ATSDR—Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) laws found in the mines studied by Santos (2018) [17] and Santos et al. (2023) [25].
Figure 5. Toxic metals above the levels allowed by national (COPAM—State Council for Environmental Policy and CETESB—Environmental Company of the State of São Paulo) and international (ATSDR—Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) laws found in the mines studied by Santos (2018) [17] and Santos et al. (2023) [25].
Ijerph 21 00871 g005
Figure 6. Results of mean root growth values after exposure to aqueous extract of mining soil samples from the Taquaral district of Minas Gerais, Brazil, expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) for samples when compared to the negative control (C−). Abbreviations: BOD = Bode; PIR = Pirineu; PIN = Pinheira; LAJ = Lajedo; MAR = Marmita.
Figure 6. Results of mean root growth values after exposure to aqueous extract of mining soil samples from the Taquaral district of Minas Gerais, Brazil, expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) for samples when compared to the negative control (C−). Abbreviations: BOD = Bode; PIR = Pirineu; PIN = Pinheira; LAJ = Lajedo; MAR = Marmita.
Ijerph 21 00871 g006
Figure 7. Photomicrographs of chromosomal and micronuclei alterations observed in the Allium cepa test. (a,j) = bridging; (b,e) = loss; (c) = c-metaphase; (d,f) = bridging and breaking; (g,i) = sticking; and (h,k) = micronuclei.
Figure 7. Photomicrographs of chromosomal and micronuclei alterations observed in the Allium cepa test. (a,j) = bridging; (b,e) = loss; (c) = c-metaphase; (d,f) = bridging and breaking; (g,i) = sticking; and (h,k) = micronuclei.
Ijerph 21 00871 g007
Figure 8. Results obtained for the study of chromosomal aberrations in 5000 meristematic cells of Allium cepa after exposure to aqueous extract of soil samples from Garimpos in the district of Taquaral de Minas, Brazil, expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) for samples when compared to the negative control (C−). Abbreviations: BOD = Bode; PIR = Pirineu; PIN = Pinheira; LAJ = Lajedo; MAR = Marmita.
Figure 8. Results obtained for the study of chromosomal aberrations in 5000 meristematic cells of Allium cepa after exposure to aqueous extract of soil samples from Garimpos in the district of Taquaral de Minas, Brazil, expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) for samples when compared to the negative control (C−). Abbreviations: BOD = Bode; PIR = Pirineu; PIN = Pinheira; LAJ = Lajedo; MAR = Marmita.
Ijerph 21 00871 g008
Figure 9. Results obtained for the Ames test without metabolization when testing aqueous extract of soil samples from mines in the district of Taquaral de Minas, Brazil, expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) for samples when compared to the negative control (C−). Abbreviations: BOD = Bode; PIR = Pirineu; PIN = Pinheira; LAJ = Lajedo; MAR = Marmita.
Figure 9. Results obtained for the Ames test without metabolization when testing aqueous extract of soil samples from mines in the district of Taquaral de Minas, Brazil, expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) for samples when compared to the negative control (C−). Abbreviations: BOD = Bode; PIR = Pirineu; PIN = Pinheira; LAJ = Lajedo; MAR = Marmita.
Ijerph 21 00871 g009
Figure 10. Results obtained for the Ames test with metabolization when testing aqueous extract of soil samples from mines in the district of Taquaral de Minas, Brazil, expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) for samples when compared to the negative control (C−). Abbreviations: BOD = Bode; PIR = Pirineu; PIN = Pinheira; LAJ = Lajedo; MAR = Marmita.
Figure 10. Results obtained for the Ames test with metabolization when testing aqueous extract of soil samples from mines in the district of Taquaral de Minas, Brazil, expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) for samples when compared to the negative control (C−). Abbreviations: BOD = Bode; PIR = Pirineu; PIN = Pinheira; LAJ = Lajedo; MAR = Marmita.
Ijerph 21 00871 g010
Table 1. Blood concentration (μg·L−1) of micronutrients for the control group and the exposed group; data presented as intervals and means.
Table 1. Blood concentration (μg·L−1) of micronutrients for the control group and the exposed group; data presented as intervals and means.
Element20–3030–4040–5050–6060–7070–80ControlR2
Fe569,634.89583,184.53572,925.90549,363.50 *377,906.93321,043.61 *580,573.830.08
Cu980.42972.83 *1154.78937.96 *488.55747.941109.770.00
Zn6798.326610.946832.316801.544454.864473.607213.150.13
Se62.9849.63 *56.12 *49.61 *43.85 *28.49 *72.820.00
Source. Santos, 2018 [17]. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) for samples when compared to the control (C). The determination coefficient (R2) refers to the correlation between micronutrients and CAT activity. The intervals 20–30, 30–40, 40–50, 50–60, 60–70, 70–80 refer to the subgroups of miners, categorized by age.
Table 2. Results of calculations of the mitotic index, average root growth, and inhibition rate observed upon analysis of 5000 meristematic cells of Allium cepa after exposure to aqueous extract of soil samples from mines in the Taquaral district of Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Table 2. Results of calculations of the mitotic index, average root growth, and inhibition rate observed upon analysis of 5000 meristematic cells of Allium cepa after exposure to aqueous extract of soil samples from mines in the Taquaral district of Minas Gerais, Brazil.
SamplesNumber of Cells in InterphaseNumber of Cells in MitosisAverage Root GrowthInhibition Rate (CTI) %Mitotic Index(MI)
1C−44935072.04 ± 0.56010.48 ± 2.48
2C+42967041.21 ± 0.57 *40.5314.10 ± 2.54 *
BOD P43916091.77 ± 0.71 *18.4212.18 ± 1.80
BOD PP43936071.66 ± 0.96 *18.6612.38 ± 2.02
BOD SS43816191.91 ± 0.776.3012.14 ± 1.98
PIR P4301699 *1.63 ± 0.71 *20.0613.98 ± 2.35 *
PIR PP4309691 *1.54 ± 0.78 *24.2913.82 ± 2.38 *
PIR SS43586421.50 ± 0.70 *26.3312.84 ± 1.33
PIN P43886121.54 ± 0.59 *24.1412.24 ± 2.01
PIN PP4305695 *2.18 ± 0.61−7.1213.90 ± 2.32 *
PIN SS44025982.16 ± 0.66−6.0811.96 ± 1.70
LAJ P43846162.11 ± 0.66−3.7412.32 ± 2.04
LAJ PP43786222.02 ± 0.671.0412.44 ± 3.08
LAJ SS43806201.76 ± 0.48 *13.6112.40 ± 2.24
MAR P4364636 *1.77 ± 0.8112.9012.72 ± 1.80 *
MAR PP4322678 *2.13 ± 0.99−4.5213.56 ± 2.36 *
MAR SS43976031.44 ± 0.65 *29.4712.06 ± 1.18
1: Ultrapure water; 2: methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). The asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) for samples when compared to the negative control (C−). Abbreviations: BOD = Bode; PIR = Pirineu; PIN = Pinheira; LAJ = Lajedo, MAR = Marmita; P = soil dust sample; PP = stone dust sample; and SS = soil sample.
Table 3. Results of chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei observed in 5000 meristematic cells of Allium cepa after exposure to aqueous extract of soil samples from mines in the district of Taquaral de Minas, Brazil, expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Table 3. Results of chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei observed in 5000 meristematic cells of Allium cepa after exposure to aqueous extract of soil samples from mines in the district of Taquaral de Minas, Brazil, expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
SamplesBridgingLossBreakingBridging
and Loss
Bridging and
Breaking
Loss and
Breaking
C-MetaphaseStickingTotal
CA
Micronuclei
1C−7 ± 0.481 ± 0.182 ± 0.360 ± 0.00 ± 0.00 ± 0.04 ± 0.640 ± 0.012 ± 3.484 ± 0.48
2C+24 ± 2.0832 ± 2.6610 ± 1.604 ± 0.790 ± 0.01 ± 0.2070 ± 2.6021 ± 1.88162 ± 35.56 *31 ± 2.52 *
BOD P8 ± 0.365 ± 0.363 ± 0.520 ± 0.00 ± 0.00 ± 0.020 ± 1.480 ± 0.036 ± 8.89 *5 ± 0.50
BOD PP17 ± 1.3620 ± 0.427 ± 1.040 ± 0.00 ± 0.03 ± 0.054 ± 1.360 ± 0.0101 ± 24.47 *7 ± 0.56
BOD SS10 ± 1.760 ± 0.01 ± 0.480 ± 0.00 ± 0.00 ± 0.022 ± 1.100 ± 0.033 ± 9.568 ± 0.48
PIR P15 ± 1.921 ± 1.9218 ± 2.520 ± 0.00 ± 0.00 ± 0.057 ± 2.908 ± 2.77119 ± 27.36 *10 ± 0.80
PIR PP9 ± 0.900 ± 0.07 ± 0.840 ± 0.00 ± 0.00 ± 0.025 ± 1.405 ± 0.8654 ± 12.22 *4 ± 0.48
PIR SS10 ± 0.7010 ± 1.206 ± 0.980 ± 0.00 ± 0.00 ± 0.027 ± 0.05 ± 0.058 ± 13.16 *3 ± 0.42
PIN P15 ± 0.704 ± 0.644 ± 0.640 ± 0.00 ± 0.00 ± 0.027 ± 1.304 ± 0.7254 ± 13.33 *4 ± 0.48
PIN PP11 ± 1.322 ± 0.320 ± 0.00 ± 0.00 ± 0.00 ± 0.021 ± 0.926 ± 0.9640 ± 10.07 *9 ± 0.54
PIN SS17 ± 1.700 ± 0.00 ± 0.00 ± 0.06 ± 1.080 ± 0.027 ± 1.644 ± 0.7257 ± 14.0 *6 ± 0.7
LAJ P19 ± 1.305 ± 0.967 ± 0.980 ± 0.00 ± 0.00 ± 0.045 ± 1.100 ± 0.076 ± 19.85 *8 ± 0.48
LAJ PP11 ± 0.9011 ± 1.125 ± 0.700 ± 0.00 ± 0.00 ± 0.030 ± 1.6812 ± 1.6869 ± 15.18 *9 ± 0.57
LAJ SS23 ± 1.760 ± 0.03 ± 0.480 ± 0.00 ± 0.00 ± 0.020 ± 1.114 ± 1.4860 ± 14.14 *7 ± 0.4
MAR P22 ± 2.07 ± 0.445 ± 0.700 ± 0.03 ± 0.540 ± 0.09 ± 1.080 ± 0.046 ± 10.564 ± 0.56
MAR PP15 ± 1.413 ± 1.8211 ± 1.120 ± 0.00 ± 0.00 ± 0.019 ± 1.506 ± 0.9664 ± 12.30 *7 ± 0.56
MAR SS14 ± 1.689 ± 0.908 ± 0.983 ± 0.590 ± 0.05 ± 0.9031 ± 1.887 ± 0.5477 ± 16.40 *7 ± 0.42
1: Ultrapure water; 2: methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). The asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) for samples when compared to the negative control (C−) using the Mann–Whitney test. Abbreviations: BOD = Bode; PIR = Pirineu; PIN = Pinheira; LAJ = Lajedo; MAR = Marmita; P = soil dust sample; PP = stone dust sample; SS = soil sample; and CA = chromosomal aberrations.
Table 4. Results of the ANOVA test and multiple comparison between the studied groups for the parameters of mean root growth and chromosomal aberrations.
Table 4. Results of the ANOVA test and multiple comparison between the studied groups for the parameters of mean root growth and chromosomal aberrations.
SamplesChromosomal
Aberrations
p ValueAverage
Root Growth
p Value
BOD P vs. PIR PYes<0.001No>0.999
BOD PP vs. PIR PPYes0.049No>0.999
BOD PP vs. PIN PPYes<0.001No0.240
BOD SS vs. MAR SSYes0.023No0.193
PIR P vs. LAJ PYes<0.001No0.125
PIR P vs. MAR PYes<0.001No>0.999
PIR PP vs. PIN PPYes<0.001Yes0.016
MAR PP vs. PIR PPNo>0.999Yes0.028
MAR SS vs. PIN SSNo0.806Yes0.005
PIR SS vs. PIN SSNo>0.99Yes0.019
PIN P vs. LAJ PNo0.148Yes0.013
Abbreviations: BOD = Bode; PIR = Pirineu; PIN = Pinheira; LAJ = Lajedo; MAR = Marmita; P = soil dust sample; PP = stone dust sample; and SS = soil sample.
Table 5. Results obtained from the Ames test with metabolization when testing aqueous extract of soil samples from mines in the district of Taquaral de Minas, Brazil, expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Table 5. Results obtained from the Ames test with metabolization when testing aqueous extract of soil samples from mines in the district of Taquaral de Minas, Brazil, expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
SamplesNo MetabolizationWith Metabolization
TA100 aMRTA 98 bMRTA 100 cMRTA98 dMR
BOD61 ± 2.03.2169 ± 2.73.8385.5 ± 2.92.8088 ± 2.52.51
PIR65.5 ± 4.53.4538 ± 4.02.11----
PIN64 ± 2.03.3740 ± 2.02.22----
LAJ71 ± 3.03.7469 ± 3.63.8372 ± 5.52.3680.05 ± 2.72.29
MAR76 ± 4.04.0039.5 ± 0.52.1965 ± 3.12.1378 ± 3.02.23
C−19 ± 3.0-18 ± 2.0-30.5 ± 3.3-35 ± 2.5-
C+84 ± 5.1-71 ± 3.3-201.5 ± 5.1-98 ± 3.5-
Ultrapure water was used for items a, b, c, and d as C−. As C+, a = nitroquinoline, b = sodium azide, and c and d = aminoanthracene were used. Abbreviations: BOD = Bode; PIR = Pirineu; PIN = Pinheira; LAJ = Lajedo; MAR = Marmita.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

da Silva, H.T.; Magalhães, T.S.; Pires, S.A.; Santos, A.P.R.; Rodrigues, J.L.; Faria, M.C.d.S. Artisanal Gem Mining in Brazil: Evaluation of Oxidative Stress and Genotoxicity Biomarkers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 871. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21070871

AMA Style

da Silva HT, Magalhães TS, Pires SA, Santos APR, Rodrigues JL, Faria MCdS. Artisanal Gem Mining in Brazil: Evaluation of Oxidative Stress and Genotoxicity Biomarkers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024; 21(7):871. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21070871

Chicago/Turabian Style

da Silva, Heberson Teixeira, Thainá Sprícido Magalhães, Sumaia Araújo Pires, Ana Paula Rufino Santos, Jairo Lisboa Rodrigues, and Márcia Cristina da Silva Faria. 2024. "Artisanal Gem Mining in Brazil: Evaluation of Oxidative Stress and Genotoxicity Biomarkers" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 21, no. 7: 871. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21070871

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop