Next Article in Journal
Social–Emotional Profiles of Preschool Children: An Investigation of Demographic Disparities and Intersectionality
Previous Article in Journal
Work-Related Musculoskeletal Problems: A Look at How Employers View Causes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Elucidating Uncertainty in Heat Vulnerability Mapping: Perspectives on Impact Variables and Modeling Approaches
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association between Heat Vulnerability Index and Stroke Severity

by
Jason J. Wang
1,2,3,*,
Jeffrey M. Katz
1,3,4,
Maria X. Sanmartin
1,2,3,
Liron D. Sinvani
1,2,5,
Jason J. Naidich
1,3,
Elizabeth Y. Rula
6 and
Pina C. Sanelli
1,2,3
1
Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, USA
2
Institute of Health System Science, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA
3
Departments of Radiology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA
4
Departments of Neurology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA
5
Departments of Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA
6
Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute, Reston, VA 20191, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(8), 1099; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21081099
Submission received: 6 July 2024 / Revised: 7 August 2024 / Accepted: 16 August 2024 / Published: 20 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heat Zone and Disease Incidence)

Abstract

:
Background: Socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods are particularly vulnerable to heat-related illnesses. We aim to investigate the association between the heat vulnerability index (HVI), an established neighborhood-level metric of heat-related mortality risk, and acute ischemic stroke (AIS) severity. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive AIS admissions to a comprehensive stroke center between 2012 and 2021. Stroke severity was defined upon admission based on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics were extracted from electronic health records. HVI status was assigned using residential ZIP codes. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Of 3429 AIS admissions, 1123 (32.8%) were from high-HVI (scores 4–5) neighborhoods and 868 (25.3%) had severe stroke (NIHSS score ≥ 10). In the multivariable regression model with stepwise selection, a high HVI was independently associated with severe stroke (adjusted odds ratio: 1.40 [95% confidence interval 1.16–1.69]). Conclusions: The association between a high HVI and severe stroke underscores the importance of targeting policy interventions to mitigate heat-related illness in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods.

1. Introduction

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of disability and death in the United States [1,2]. AIS disproportionately affects socioeconomically disadvantaged groups and results in worse clinical outcomes [3,4]. In particular, low-income and racial minority (i.e., Black and Hispanic) groups have higher rates of AIS [5] and more severe strokes [6], and are associated with higher rates of mortality and dependent disabilities [7]. Other disparities in stroke care have also been described based on geographic factors. AIS patients residing in rural, compared to urban, settings have been found to have lower utilization of stroke imaging and acute treatment [8]. Furthermore, there was significantly lower imaging utilization in the southern region of the United States, suggesting regional variability in practice patterns and resource utilization [8]. Thus, studying the geographic and environmental factors leading to inequities in stroke outcomes will provide further insights for addressing disparities in stroke care.
Environmental heat exposure is an AIS risk factor, with higher temperatures linked to increased AIS incidence and mortality [9]. Previous studies primarily focused on biological (e.g., hypertension) and intrapersonal (e.g., lifestyle) determinants [4,8]. Socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods are particularly vulnerable to heat-related illnesses due to limited availability of the resources needed to mitigate the effects of heat, yet no studies have evaluated the combined impact of heat and socioeconomic disparity on AIS severity [10].
The heat vulnerability index (HVI) is an established metric incorporating factors associated with adverse health effects during extreme heat and is used to identify neighborhoods with an elevated risk of heat-related deaths [11]. The New York City (NYC) Department of Health developed the HVI using a statistical model incorporating environmental (i.e., surface temperature and green space) and social (i.e., poverty and race) factors, with a scoring system from 1 (low risk) to 5 (high risk) [12], while similar indexes were developed for other regions in the nation [13]. Vulnerability to heat geographically varied in NYC neighborhoods [12]. The socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods experienced the highest vulnerability, with increased heat stress emergency events [13]. Since susceptibility to heat stress depends on interrelated environmental and social factors, the HVI is a valuable metric to study neighborhood-level disparities.
Examining individual factors alone may not provide a complete understanding of heat-related disparities. Neighborhoods with resources to combat heat, such as air-conditioned spaces, experience lower vulnerability. By considering both environmental and social determinants using the HVI, nuanced insights into heat-related disparities can be gained to inform policymaking efforts to reduce stroke disparities. Exploring neighborhood factors using a novel modifiable stroke risk factor for AIS is an innovative approach to address environmental and social determinants of stroke disparities.
This study aims to explore the association between the HVI and stroke severity, as measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission, leveraging a comprehensive database from a diverse socioeconomic region in the NYC metropolitan area. We hypothesize that patients from high-HVI neighborhoods have worse stroke severity at presentation compared to patients from low-HVI neighborhoods. Our research builds upon previous work on stroke disparities [4,8,14], aiming to identify and address geographic-level inequities related to neighborhood characteristics. By extending our investigation to explore novel avenues in stroke research, we strive to contribute to reducing disparities in stroke care delivery and outcomes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Cohort

The study cohort was extracted from the Stroke Health Outcomes (SHOUT) database, representing a retrospective, consecutive series of AIS admissions to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) serving NYC between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2021. Our CSC functions as the hub of a large, integrated, urban–suburban stroke network, composed of 17 stroke centers. Patient information was imported into the SHOUT database from the American Heart Association Get-With-The-Guidelines-Stroke database based on discharge diagnosis codes for ischemic stroke (International Classification of Disease 9/10: 433.x1, 434.x1, I63.xx). The socioeconomic information was self-reported by patients or caregivers at admission.
The inclusion criteria were (1) adult patients (≥18 years old) with (2) discharge codes for ischemic stroke (International Classification of Disease 9/10 433.x1, 434.x1, I63.xx). The exclusion criteria were (1) emergency visits that did not yield hospitalization and (2) a residential zip code missing or outside of NYC. We obtained Institutional Review Board approval with a waiver of consent given the retrospective nature of this study.

2.2. Data Collection

Individual-level variables were collected with the following categorization: (a) demographic: age (18–49, 50–79, and 80+ years), gender (female, male), race (Asian, Black, white, other/unknown) based on self-identification and categorized according to the National Institutes of Health policy [15], insurance type (Medicare, Medicaid, private, uninsured), and median household income (<USD 80,000, USD 80,000+) based on patient zip codes reported by the United States Census Bureau [16]; (b) arrival method (ambulance, private transportation, transfer from primary stroke center, in-hospital stroke, unknown); (c) clinical: NIHSS score, last known well to arrival (LKWA) time (<6 h, 6–24 h, >24 h, in-hospital stroke, unknown), and medical comorbidities (atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, carotid stenosis, depression, diabetes mellitus, drug/alcohol abuse, dyslipidemia, family history of stroke, hypertension, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, previous stroke, renal insufficiency, sleep apnea, tobacco smoking, transient ischemic attack, and none).
We acquired HVI data from the NYC Department of Health. Using residence zip codes, we merged the study cohort with NYC-HVI data. The NYC-HVI scores ranged from 1 (lowest risk) to 5 (highest risk). We dichotomized the HVI groups into low-HVI (scores 1–3) and high-HVI (scores 4–5).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive frequency statistics and bivariate analyses were conducted using Chi-square tests to assess significant differences in the demographic and clinical characteristics between HVI groups. For continuous variables (age, NIHSS, LKWA), the mean, standard deviation (SD), median, and interquartile range (IQR) were also calculated. p-values were estimated for categorical groups using the Chi-square test and for the mean values using t-tests.
Separate logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the associations between a high HVI and severe stroke, with the dependent variable being the NIHSS score upon admission. The primary outcome was severe stroke, defined as an NIHSS score ≥ 10. Analyses were performed utilizing other NIHSS cut-offs to define “severe” stroke (NIHSS score ≥ 6 and ≥16) [4,8,17]. We also performed separate analyses to account for patients with missing admission NIHSS scores (15.5%) by either including them with the low NIHSS category [14] or excluding them from the analyses. Independent variables were discharge year (2012–2021), demographics (excluding race since it is a component of the HVI), arrival method, LKWA, and comorbidities. Patients with missing data for LKWA (27.1%) were grouped with the >24 h category for out-of-hospital stroke onset [4,8]. To avoid multi-collinearity, we performed multivariable regression analyses using stepwise selection while maintaining a high HVI in the models.
Odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p-values were estimated. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. SAS v9.4 software (SAS, Cary, NC, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.

3. Results

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study cohort are presented in Table 1. Of 7540 AIS episodes from 2012 to 2021 in the SHOUT database, 3429 (45.5%) were from the NYC area. The number of annual AIS episodes ranged from 170 visits in 2012 to 490 visits in 2021. Amongst the 3429 AIS visits, 32.8% were from high-HVI (4–5) neighborhoods, 31.8% were aged 80+, 49% were female, 23.1% were Black, 13.8% had an LKWA time of 24+ h, and 25.3% had an NIHSS score of 10+.
As shown in Table 1, we also performed statistical comparisons between low- and high-HVI categories. Bivariate analyses show that a high HVI was significantly associated with higher stroke severity (NIHSS score 10+: 28.6% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.004). A high HVI was also significantly associated with younger age (mean [years] 66.4 vs. 72.8, p < 0.0001), Black race (59.1% vs. 5.6%, p < 0.0001), Medicaid insurance (23.1% vs. 19.1%, p = 0.0072), and a lower MHI (MHI USD 80k+: 32.7% vs. 42.1%, p < 0.0001). In terms of stroke risk factors, the high-HVI group also had statistically higher rates of diabetes mellitus (43.8% vs. 31.6%, p < 0.0001), hypertension (77.7% vs. 69.6%, p < 0.0001), and obesity (44.7% vs. 35.6%, p < 0.0001).
Using various NIHSS cut-off points and excluding the missing data, we found that a high HVI (4–5) was a statistically significant risk factor in all logistic regression models (Table 2), with an NIHSS score ≥ 10 representing the most significant one (OR = 1.40; 95% CI = [1.16, 1.69]). We also ran a regression model with the missing NIHSS data included in the reference group and tested this using a score of 5 as a high HVI. All of the regression models showed a significant impact of a high HVI on stroke severity, with similar odds ratios (ranging from 1.26 to 1.40).
As indicated in Table 3, factors such as older age, female gender, transferred patients, arrival via emergency medical services (EMSs), an LKWA time of <24 h, atrial fibrillation, and drug/alcohol use were associated with higher stroke severity (NIHSS score of 10+). Conversely, carotid stenosis, smoking status, and transient ischemic attack were associated with lower stroke severity.

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to report an association between the HVI (metric of combined environmental and socioeconomic factors) and stroke severity. The association between a high HVI and severe AIS was significant regardless of the NIHSS threshold studied (≥6, ≥10, or ≥16), with similar odds ratios. Although further investigation is warranted, our findings potentially represent a novel, modifiable, neighborhood-level stroke risk factor. Our study also uniquely describes the demographic and clinical characteristics of AIS patients from high-HVI neighborhoods.
Our study pioneers the evaluation of the HVI as a potentially new metric for studying stroke disparities by delving into local geographic inequities and exploring interrelated environmental and social factors contributing to stroke severity.
Despite its strengths, our study has certain limitations. It is based on data from a single comprehensive stroke center (CSC) serving a densely populated but geographically confined urban area in NYC. Extending this study to suburban or rural areas may yield different results, necessitating further research. Also, since we do not have the healthcare access information at the patient level, which may be a confounder of the analysis, it is still a limitation. Additionally, the retrospective nature of our study led to missing data, particularly concerning baseline NIHSS scores and LKWA time. Although we implemented methods to mitigate this weakness, such as exploring the analysis with or without the missing data and obtaining similar results, it remains a limitation. Further research with more complete data is needed to ensure the robustness of the conclusions.
Our investigation expands the scope of stroke research by delving into geographic inequities and exploring the interrelated environmental and social factors contributing to stroke severity. Unlike previous studies concentrating on system-level inequities in stroke care access and delivery, we pivot toward studying the neighborhood environment. This shift is paramount, considering the escalating concern over rising temperatures and the existing disparities in stroke and heat-related deaths. By focusing on neighborhoods vulnerable to the health effects of heat, our study aims to provide crucial insights for addressing stroke disparities.

5. Conclusions

We identified a novel neighborhood-level marker to evaluate stroke risk. Focusing stroke interventions on modifiable factors contributing to a high HVI, such as heat mitigation, may be an effective public health strategy to reduce stroke burden in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Further research is needed to confirm this association and evaluate whether the HVI also impacts stroke outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.J.W. and P.C.S.; methodology, J.J.W. and P.C.S.; software, J.J.W.; validation, J.J.W. and P.C.S.; formal analysis, J.J.W.; investigation, J.J.W. and P.C.S.; resources, J.J.W. and P.C.S.; data curation, J.J.W. and P.C.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.J.W. and P.C.S.; writing—review and editing, J.J.W., J.M.K., M.X.S., L.D.S., J.J.N., E.Y.R. and P.C.S.; visualization, J.J.W. and P.C.S.; supervision, J.J.W. and P.C.S.; project administration, J.J.W. and P.C.S.; funding acquisition, E.Y.R. and P.C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Sanelli has received research grants from the Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute during this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Northwell Health (IRB #: HS16-0480; Mod. Approval Date: 25 July 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the nature of the study and IRB approval.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to ongoing studies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

HVI = heat vulnerability index; AIS = acute ischemic stroke; MHI = median household income; LKWA = last known well to arrival; NIHSS = National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; EMSs = emergency medical services; CAD = coronary artery disease; PVD = peripheral vascular disease; TIA = transient ischemic attack.

References

  1. GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021, 20, 795–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Donkor, E.S. Stroke in the 21st century: A snapshot of the burden, epidemiology, and quality of life. Stroke Res. Treat. 2018, 2018, 3238165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vagal, A.; Sucharew, H.; Wang, L.L.; Kissela, B.; Alwell, K.; Haverbusch, M.; Woo, D.; Ferioli, S.; Mackey, J.; Rosa, F.D.L.R.L.; et al. Trends in disparities in advanced neuroimaging utilization in acute stroke: A population-based study. Stroke 2023, 54, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, J.; Katz, J.M.; Sanmartin, M.; Naidich, J.J.; Rula, E.; Sanelli, P.C. Sex-based disparity in acute stroke imaging utilization and the impact on treatment and outcomes: 2012–2021. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2024, 21, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gardener, H.; Sacco, R.L.; Rundek, T.; Battistella, V.; Cheung, Y.K.; Elkind, M.S.V. Race and Ethnic Disparities in Stroke Incidence in the Northern Manhattan Study. Stroke 2020, 51, 1064–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  6. Howard, V.J.; Kleindorfer, D.O.; Judd, S.E.; McClure, L.A.; Safford, M.M.; Rhodes, J.D.; Cushman, M.; Moy, C.S.; Soliman, E.Z.; Kissela, B.M.; et al. Disparities in stroke incidence contributing to disparities in stroke mortality. Ann. Neurol. 2011, 69, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  7. Yadav, R.S.; Chaudhary, D.; Avula, V.; Shahjouei, S.; Azarpazhooh, M.R.; Abedi, V.; Li, J.; Zand, R. Social Determinants of Stroke Hospitalization and Mortality in United States’ Counties. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  8. Wang, J.J.; Boltyenkov, A.; Katz, J.M.; O’Hara, J.; Gribko, M.; Sanelli, P.C. Striving for Socioeconomic Equity in Ischemic Stroke Care: Imaging and Acute Treatment Utilization from a Comprehensive Stroke Center. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2022, 19, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wen, J.; Zou, L.; Jiang, Z.; Li, Y.; Tao, J.; Liu, Y.; Fu, W.; Bai, X.; Mao, J. Association between ambient temperature and risk of stroke morbidity and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav. 2023, 13, e3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Madrigano, J.; Ito, K.; Johnson, S.; Kinney, P.L.; Matte, T. A Case-Only Study of Vulnerability to Heat Wave–RelatedMortality in New York City (2000–2011). Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123, 672–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Nayak, S.; Shrestha, S.; Kinney, P.; Ross, Z.; Sheridan, S.; Pantea, C.; Hsu, W.; Muscatiello, N.; Hwang, S. Development of a heat vulnerability index for New York State. Public Health 2018, 161, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. New York City Department of Health. Heat Vulnerability Index. Published 15 September 2023. Available online: https://a816-dohbesp.nyc.gov/IndicatorPublic/data-features/hvi/ (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  13. New York State Department of Health. Heat Vulnerability Index 2023. Published 14 September 2023. Available online: https://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/weather/vulnerability_index/index.htm (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  14. Wang, J.J.; Pelzl, C.E.; Boltyenkov, A.; Katz, J.M.; Hemingway, J.; Christensen, E.W.; Rula, E.; Sanelli, P.C. Updated Trends, Disparities, and Clinical Impact of Neuroimaging Utilization in Ischemic Stroke in the Medicare Population: 2012 to 2019. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2022, 19, 854–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. NIH Policy on Reporting Race and Ethnicity Data: Subjects in Clinical Research. 8 August 2001. Available online: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not-od-01-053.html (accessed on 22 April 2021).
  16. United States Census Bureau. B19013 Median Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2018 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars). 2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. Available online: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/all?q=B19013%20median%20household%20income%20in%20the%20past%2012%20months%20%28in%202018%20inflation-adjusted%20dollars%29%205%20year%20estimates (accessed on 22 April 2021).
  17. Zhuo, Y.; Qu, Y.; Wu, J.; Huang, X.; Yuan, W.; Lee, J.; Yang, Z.; Zee, B. Estimation of stroke severity with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale grading and retinal features: A cross-sectional study. Medicine 2021, 100, e26846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of study cohort.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of study cohort.
CharacteristicsCategoriesn%Low HVI 1–3High HVI 4–5p-Value
Mean %Mean %
Total 342910067.232.8
Discharge Year2012 1705.05.83.3<0.0001
2013 2467.27.95.8
2014 2687.88.66.1
2015 3269.510.28.2
2016 34910.210.89.0
2017 36710.710.810.5
2018 38711.310.313.3
2019 41812.211.413.5
2020 40811.910.814.2
2021 49014.313.416.1
Age18–49 Yrs 3119.17.412.4<0.0001
50–79 Yrs 202959.254.668.6
80+ Yrs 108931.838.019.0
Mean 342970.772.8266.38<0.0001
GenderFemale 168149.048.051.00.1019
Male 174851.052.049.0
RaceAsian 45613.314.810.2<0.0001
Black 79223.15.659.1
White 157345.962.811.1
Other/Unknown 60817.716.819.6
InsuranceMedicareNo155945.540.855.1<0.0001
Yes187054.559.244.9
MedicaidNo272979.680.976.90.0072
Yes70020.419.123.1
PrivateNo122235.635.436.20.6598
Yes220764.464.663.8
UninsuredNo332897.197.496.30.0548
Yes1013.02.63.7
Arrival MethodEMSs 95928.031.420.9<0.0001
Private Transportation 112132.733.531.0
Transfer 89526.123.631.3
In-Hospital Stroke 2758.06.910.3
Unknown 1795.24.66.5
LKW to ArrivalIn-Hospital Stroke 2758.06.910.30.0023
0–6 h 87425.526.323.9
6–24 h 87725.626.623.5
≥24 h 47413.813.714.0
Unknown 92927.126.528.3
Mean 222519.318.5720.960.1116
ComorbiditiesAtrial Fibrillation 57916.918.812.9<0.0001
CAD 59917.517.916.70.3794
Carotid Stenosis 722.12.21.90.5126
Depression 1173.44.02.20.0076
Diabetes 122035.631.643.8<0.0001
Drug/Alcohol 952.82.43.50.0803
Dyslipidemia 139840.841.439.50.3052
Family Stroke History 601.82.01.30.1969
Hypertension 247872.369.677.7<0.0001
Obese/Overweight 132238.635.644.7<0.0001
PVD 471.41.31.60.4145
Previous Stroke 65619.118.121.20.0321
Renal Insufficiency 2206.45.38.60.0002
Sleep Apnea 461.31.31.40.7674
Smoker 3089.08.79.60.3642
TIA 1374.04.04.00.9804
None 2226.57.73.9<0.0001
NIHSS ScoreUnknown 53115.515.016.50.0091
0–5 169049.351.145.5
6–9 3409.9210.29.4
10–15 34510.19.511.1
16–42 52315.314.217.5
Mean 28987.47.058.140.0006
HVI1 91426.7
2 80623.5
3 58617.1
4 77322.5
5 35010.2
HVI, heat vulnerability index; EMSs, emergency medical services; LKWA, last known well to arrival; CAD, coronary artery disease; PVD, peripheral vascular disease; TIA, transient ischemic attack; NIHSS, National Institutes of Stroke Scale. p-values for categorical groups were calculated with the Chi-square test; p-values for the means were calculated with t-tests.
Table 2. Logistic regression analyses of high-HVI impact on stroke severity using various NIHSS thresholds. Separate analyses were performed to handle patients with missing NIHSS data by either including these patients in low NIHSS group (A) or excluding these patients from analysis (B).
Table 2. Logistic regression analyses of high-HVI impact on stroke severity using various NIHSS thresholds. Separate analyses were performed to handle patients with missing NIHSS data by either including these patients in low NIHSS group (A) or excluding these patients from analysis (B).
High HVI (Scores 4–5)
Stroke SeverityOR95% CIp-Value
A. Missing NIHSS Data Included in Reference Low NIHSS Group (N = 3429)
NIHSS score ≥ 61.261.071.490.0067
NIHSS score ≥ 101.361.141.630.0009
NIHSS score ≥ 161.331.031.730.0300
B. Missing NIHSS Data Excluded (N = 2898)
NIHSS score ≥ 61.291.081.540.0045
NIHSS score ≥ 101.401.161.690.0005
NIHSS score ≥ 161.341.031.740.0302
HVI, heat vulnerability index; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Table 3. Logistic regression analysis with stepwise selection of high-HVI impact on stroke severity (NIHSS score ≥ 10).
Table 3. Logistic regression analysis with stepwise selection of high-HVI impact on stroke severity (NIHSS score ≥ 10).
FactorsOR95% CIp-Value
High HVI (scores 4–5)1.401.161.690.0005
Year 2012Reference
Year 20130.450.310.66<0.0001
Year 20201.461.121.900.005
Age ≥ 801.341.091.640.0046
Female1.341.121.610.0012
Transferred 4.603.735.68<0.0001
Arrived Using EMSs 1.791.442.23<0.0001
Medicaid1.371.111.700.0037
LWKA time ≥ 24 h0.440.370.54<0.0001
Atrial Fibrillation1.861.492.33<0.0001
CAD1.311.041.650.0222
Carotid Stenosis0.360.160.850.0186
Drug/Alcohol2.091.243.520.0055
Smoker0.580.410.820.0017
TIA0.520.310.880.0142
HVI, heat vulnerability index; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; EMSs, emergency medical services; LKWA, last known well to arrival; CAD, coronary artery disease; PVD, peripheral vascular disease; TIA, transient ischemic attack. Independent variables not selected by stepwise selection were eliminated from the table. We also adjusted the models by year (using Year 2012 as the reference) to reflect possible time-related impacts (such as COVID-19 in 2020) on the stroke severity of admitted AIS patients.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.J.; Katz, J.M.; Sanmartin, M.X.; Sinvani, L.D.; Naidich, J.J.; Rula, E.Y.; Sanelli, P.C. Association between Heat Vulnerability Index and Stroke Severity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21081099

AMA Style

Wang JJ, Katz JM, Sanmartin MX, Sinvani LD, Naidich JJ, Rula EY, Sanelli PC. Association between Heat Vulnerability Index and Stroke Severity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024; 21(8):1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21081099

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jason J., Jeffrey M. Katz, Maria X. Sanmartin, Liron D. Sinvani, Jason J. Naidich, Elizabeth Y. Rula, and Pina C. Sanelli. 2024. "Association between Heat Vulnerability Index and Stroke Severity" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 21, no. 8: 1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21081099

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop