Next Article in Journal
Exploring Prehospital Data for Pandemic Preparedness: A Western Brazilian Amazon Case Study on COVID-19
Previous Article in Journal
Oral Problems in Brazilian Individuals with Rare Genetic Diseases That Affect Skeletal Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Problematic Pornography Use, Mental Health, and Suicidality among Young Adults

by
Mujde Altin
1,2,
Diego De Leo
2,3,4,
Noemi Tribbia
2,
Lucia Ronconi
5 and
Sabrina Cipolletta
1,*
1
Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy
2
De Leo Fund, 35137 Padua, Italy
3
Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, Griffth University, Mt Gravatt, QLD 4122, Australia
4
Slovene Centre for Suicide Research, Primorska University, 6000 Koper, Slovenia
5
Computer and Statistical Services, Multifunctional Pole of Psychology, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(9), 1228; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21091228
Submission received: 9 August 2024 / Revised: 10 September 2024 / Accepted: 13 September 2024 / Published: 18 September 2024

Abstract

:
The relationship between suicidality and problematic pornography use (PPU) is not clear, and the limited research data that exists show contradictory results. The present study aims to explore the associations between these two variables in a sample of young adults, taking into account gender differences and the role of loneliness, emotional states, and well-being. A total of 332 national and international students (60% female) at an Italian University with a mean age of 23 years (SD = 2.84) completed an anonymous online survey during the period from March 2023 to May 2023. The results show that PPU was associated with higher levels of anxiety, depression, stress, loneliness, and suicide ideation, as well as lower life satisfaction. Gender comparison analysis revealed significantly higher scores for PPU and loneliness among men, while women scored higher in stress, anxiety, and life satisfaction. Significant correlations between PPU and suicidal ideation and having a suicide plan were established for female participants despite their lower scores in PPU. Multiple regression analysis revealed that PPU and its interaction with gender were both significant predictors of suicidal ideation. Future attention should be paid to how young women may be influenced by exposure to sexually explicit materials, while always considering the role of loneliness.

1. Introduction

Pornography consumption has dramatically risen in the last few decades [1], and the Internet has played a substantial role in this uptrend [2]. Particularly after the outbreak of the COVID-19 virus worldwide, the mandatory quarantine period caused drastic changes in several areas of individuals’ lives, including Internet pornography use [3,4]. A data report retrieved from one of the most trafficked websites globally, Pornhub, shows that with the spread of the pandemic, the traffic to Pornhub skyrocketed [5]. The number of daily new cases of COVID-19 could predict the site traffic, and the increase in Pornhub access was significantly associated with the spread of the virus [5]. Not surprisingly, this turn of events pointed to the issue of PPU, widening the interest in research on the topic [3,6,7].
The first model developed to understand better why pornography has become an appealing platform for sexual purposes was proposed by Cooper in 1998 [8]. He called this model the ‘Triple-A Engine’, in which the triple-A structure refers to the Accessibility, Affordability, and Anonymity of the Internet [8]. Thus, the fact that material can be accessed quickly and usually free of charge, while keeping the identity unsigned, may encourage its use, even in the presence of harmful effects. Potentially, those who engage with pornography to mitigate negative feelings and escape reality could be in danger of encountering problems related to its use [9].
PPU encompasses difficulties in terms of controlling the frequency, duration, or intensity of pornography use, all of which can disrupt daily functioning, relationships, or general well-being [2,10,11,12,13,14]. Some well-established negative effects related to PPU include sexual aggression [15], loneliness [13,16,17,18], distress, depression, and anxiety [2,13,19,20,21,22], neuroticism [23], sexual dissatisfaction and marital problems [24,25,26,27], negative body image [28], moral incongruence [12], low self-esteem and poor attachment [2], and isolation [29]. Moreover, in previous studies, hypersexual behaviors that usually include porn dependency showed links with executive impairment [30]. A more recent review by Castro-Calvo et al. (2021) [31] revealed that PPU shows associations more specifically with cognitive functions such as attentional bias, inhibitory control, working memory, and decision-making (e.g., a tendency to choose short-term benefits).
In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) [32] and its Text Revision (DSM-5 TR) [33], the choice of pornography content is a diagnostic indicator for some disorders but is not recognized as a separate entity [34,35]. Recent neuroscientific studies showed that there are similarities in terms of brain responses on the part of individuals with Internet addictions (including gaming, online shopping, and pornography use) and drug addictions [36,37,38,39], sparking debates about whether PPU is a form of addiction or a disorder [40]. Conversely, some feminist scholars have expressed concerns regarding the medicalization of “porn addiction” by perceiving it as an illness [41].
At this point in time, it is not very clear how we should portray and assess PPU [2,6,7,38,42,43,44]. Fernandez and Griffiths [7] investigated 22 tools assessing PPU. Among them, the Cyber Pornography Addiction Test (CYPAT) is one of those screening tools developed to provide a short and effective measure of Internet pornography addiction [7,20]. It is a brief, easily applicable, 11-item test having powerful psychometric properties. It includes 8 different addiction components: salience, impaired control, relapse, mood modification, interpersonal conflict, general life conflict, sex life conflict, and use despite harm. In addition, CYPAT is one of the two scales that evaluates the ‘use despite harm’ component as a separate category [7,20], which made it a good fit for the present study.
When discussing the effects of pornography consumption, it is often assumed that adolescents and young adults appear particularly vulnerable [45,46]. Although they may possess different motivations for using sexually explicit materials [47] due to their ongoing sexual development and curiosity, they may interpret pornographic material without critical evaluation, perceiving it as a realistic portrayal of sexuality [46,48]. For example, it was found that adolescents’ exposition to sexualized media was associated with increased sexual objectification of women [49]. Additionally, among adolescents, being male, having a sensation-seeking personality, lower self-control, lower life satisfaction, and family troubles were predictors for consuming pornography more often [10,50,51]. Efrati [52] states that the difference between having problematic or non-problematic pornography use may depend on the perspective young individuals have about mental health, feminism, or religion. This may explain consistent gender differences in pornography consumption and PPU.
In addition, previous research shows that impulsive traits commonly observed among young individuals are associated not only with PPU but also with other behavioral addictions [4,53,54]. For instance, Khatcherian et al. [55] highlighted that loneliness experienced during adolescence is linked to Internet addiction, while extreme levels of it may contribute to developing suicidal ideation. Indeed, adolescents with Internet addiction had elevated levels of depression and suicidal ideation [56]. Furthermore, in a recent review [57], researchers demonstrated the bidirectional relationship between pornography use (PU), PPU, and loneliness. PU/PPU was able to predict loneliness, and vice versa. Despite all the above-mentioned risks and concerns, intervention and treatment strategies relating to PPU among young adults are lacking, and more evidence-based research in this field is required [57].
Young individuals are also accepted to be particularly vulnerable when it comes to suicidality [58], and considering the fact that those who are at higher risk of suicide tend to spend more time on the Internet [59,60,61,62,63,64], the relationship between suicide and pornography requires more attention. A recent study of 4404 patients with behavioral addictions, including sex addiction, revealed correlations with suicidality [65]: patients with gambling disorder and sex addiction were at higher risk of developing suicidal thoughts and actively engaging in attempts. Moreover, Kim et al. [59] found that the number of adolescents who experienced depressive and suicidal episodes was highest for those who used internet pornography. In another study, suicidal men reported significantly higher use of online pornography [61]. However, it is not clear whether these participants experienced PPU specifically. These results are inconsistent with another study where no statistically significant association was found between PPU and suicidal ideation among US veteran men [66]. As highlighted by Sharpe and Mead [67], it is uncertain whether depression experienced by people who have PPU may lead to suicidality. Additionally, as mentioned earlier, the minimal data that exist on this issue show controversial results.
The aim of the present study was to explore the precise link between PPU and suicidality, but also PPU’s association with loneliness, emotional states, and life satisfaction. The focus was on young adults as a population that is particularly vulnerable to the potential negative consequences of PPU. This study included three main hypotheses:
H1. 
PPU is positively associated with suicidality among young adults.
H2. 
PPU is positively associated with depression, anxiety, stress, and loneliness, and is negatively associated with life satisfaction.
H3. 
Gender moderates the relationship between PPU and suicidality.
We also explored the nationality/cultural background role in young adults’ PPU and mental health. Finally, loneliness was considered as a predictor that could worsen participants’ mental health if associated with PPU.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

From March 2023 to May 2023, 337 students from the University of Padova (Italy) completed an anonymous online survey. Inclusion criteria were as follows: being 18+ years of age; being a regular or exchange student at the University of Padova; residing in Italy.
After the removal of 5 participants with missing and non-complete data, a total of 332 individuals were included in the final analysis. The mean age of the participants was 23.41 with a standard deviation of 2.84. Of these, 202 were female and 120 were male. The international sample included 64 males, 93 females, and 3 non-binary participants, whereas the Italian sample consisted of 58 males, 109 females, and 5 non-binary participants together with 2 who did not want to report their gender information. The proportion of females to males showed similarities between the total sample (about 60%), the international sample (about 58%), and the Italian sample (about 62%). Thus, the gender ratio was consistent within groups, although there was a slight imbalance in favor of female participants. The samples’ characteristics are illustrated in Table 1.
To determine the size of the necessary sample, a power analysis was conducted using G*Power; it showed that a total sample of 270 was necessary to detect a moderate effect (Slope H1 = 0.15) with a power of 0.80 to perform correlational analysis. To examine the differences between the two groups, a second power analysis was performed. The results revealed the need to recruit at least 64 participants for each group in order to conduct a T-test with a power of 0.80 and an effect size of 0.50. For both power analyses, statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethical Committee for Psychological Research of the University of Padua approved this study (Protocol No. 5077). Those participants who gave their approval to the consent form could continue with the survey. Participants did not receive any remuneration (e.g., prize draw, course credit, etc.) for participation in this study.

2.2. Measures

The Qualtrics platform was used to create and distribute the survey through an online anonymous link and QR code. Both English and Italian languages were used for the survey, and participants were recruited through advertising on Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, WhatsApp, and in university campus areas. The completion of the survey took 9–10 min.
Socio-demographic information relating to the sample was gathered, and the following standardized questionnaire was administered to assess PPU, feelings of loneliness, emotional states (including depression, anxiety, and stress), and life satisfaction:
Cyber Pornography Addiction Test (CYPAT, [20]). A self-reporting scale of 11 items was scored on a five-point Likert scale, from never (0) to always (4). The summed score for the CYPAT ranges from 0 to 44, with higher scores corresponding to higher levels of PPU.
Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (rULS-6, [68,69,70]). Initially developed for the examination of loneliness in a variety of contexts, it consists of 6 Likert scale items, ranging from never (1) to always (4). The summed score for the RULS-6 ranges from 6 to 24, and higher scores indicate higher levels of loneliness.
Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21, [71,72,73]), a short version of DASS-42 consisting of three subscales for depression, anxiety, and stress. Each subscale contains seven items, and the cut-off scores suggest the severity of the condition. All items were rated on a four-point Likert scale from 0 (did not apply to me at all) to 3 (applied to me very much or most of the time), and with the raw scores being multiplied by two. The summed score for the DASS-21 ranges from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depression, anxiety, and stress.
Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS, [74,75]). A short 5-item scale scored on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from completely disagree (1) to completely agree (7), designed to measure global cognitive judgments of satisfaction with one’s life. The summed score for the SWLS ranges from 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating higher levels of life satisfaction.
Four ad-hoc questions on suicidal thoughts and attempts were presented to investigate whether or not the participants had faced these experiences and, if so, how often they had occurred. For suicidal ideation, the question “Have you ever had ideas about taking your own life?” was presented (Yes/No) with four possible answers: “Never; Rarely; Sometimes; Often”. Participants who reported having suicidal ideation were additionally asked if they had a ‘specific suicide plan’ (Yes/No) with the following question: “Have you ever had a specific plan to take your own life?”. In terms of suicidal attempts, the participants were first asked, “Have you ever tried to take your own life?” and if so, how often it had happened: “Once; Twice; Two times or more”. Those who had not had any suicidal ideation in the past were not asked any further questions.

2.3. Data Analysis

Rstudio software was used to perform statistical analysis. The missing data were handled in various ways. Particularly, three subjects were excluded due to missing demographic information, and two more were excluded as they had missing data in all measure variables with the exception of loneliness. To handle the missing values in the CYPAT, ULS6, DASS-21, and SWLS scales, means were calculated based on the valid answers of the same subjects. The missing values were automatically excluded for group and gender comparison analysis, as well as for the correlation and regression models.
Descriptive analyses were conducted to investigate demographic variables, and Cronbach’s alpha for each questionnaire was calculated to assess the internal consistency. Gender (female vs. male) and group differences (Italian vs. international students) were investigated using Welch’s t-test for the RULS-6 and CYPAT (due to the different variance), standard t-test for DASS-21, and SWLS and Chi-square test to compare male and female scores with regard to suicidality. Spearman correlation analysis was used to measure linear relationships between variables.
Multiple regressions were computed with loneliness and PPU as independent variables and gender as a moderator to see the potential interaction effect. Suicidal ideation, depression, anxiety, stress, and life satisfaction were considered dependent variables.

3. Results

Descriptive statistics with regard to the questionnaire scores can be found in Table 2. Significant gender differences were found for all variables (loneliness, PPU, stress, anxiety, and life satisfaction) with the exception of depression. Female participants scored significantly higher on DASS-21 (particularly stress and anxiety) and SWLS (life satisfaction), while male participants scored significantly higher on CYPAT (problematic pornography use) and RULS-6 (loneliness). Comparisons are reported in Table 3.
Italian and international students did not report significant group differences for PPU (t = 1.196, p = 0.233). On the contrary, Italian students reported significantly higher levels of loneliness (t = −2.254, p = 0.025) and stress (t = −2.136, p = 0.033), while international participants scored significantly higher on life satisfaction (t = 2.055, p = 0.041).
Regarding the four ad-hoc questions asked to assess suicidality, 163 (49%) participants reported that they never had any suicidal thoughts, whereas the rest reported having them rarely 94 (28%), sometimes 49 (15%), and often 26 (8%). 102 (60%) did not have any specific plan to take their own life, whereas 67 (40%) specified that they did have a specific plan 32 (19%). Most participants reported that they had never attempted suicide 136 (81%), whereas 32 (19%) reported that they had attempted suicide at least once 18 (55%), twice 9 (27%), three times or more 6 (18%). No significant gender difference was found for suicidal ideation (χ2 = 2.654, p = 0.448), having a suicide plan (χ2 = 0, p = 1), or suicidal attempts (χ2 = 0.403, p = 0.525).
Correlations were calculated with regard to the whole sample and in the two subsamples of males and females. As reported in Table 4, PPU showed a significant relationship with all the included variables in the female sample with the exception of suicide attempts. For males, despite higher levels of reported PPU compared to females, significant associations were found with loneliness, stress, anxiety, and depression, but not in terms of life satisfaction and suicidality.
Multiple regression analysis was used to further investigate correlational findings. As shown in Table 5 and Figure 1, PPU and loneliness were used as predictors, while suicidal ideation was the dependent variable. Gender was used as a moderator to determine the potential interaction effect. Overall, the model was significant (F(5, 316) = 11.57, p < 0.001) and explained about 14% of the variance (considering the adjusted R2 coefficient), suggesting an optimizable fit to the data.
The individual effects of the predictors show that PPU (ß = 0.07, t = −4.44, p < 0.001) and loneliness (ß = 0.07, t = 3.94, p < 0.001) both predict suicidal ideation. Gender by itself did not significantly predict suicidal ideation (ß = −0.13, t = −0.35, p = 0.73), whereas its interaction with PPU showed a significant effect (ß = −0.07, t = −3.36, p< 0.001). Thus, the relationship between PPU and suicidal ideation is moderated by gender, and significant only for female participants. Such a moderation effect was absent with regard to loneliness (ß = 0.01, t = 0.33, p = 0.74).

4. Discussion

The aim of this study was to analyze the association between PPU and mental health, suicide ideation, and well-being in college students. Our study results showed a positive link between PPU and pornography use and anxiety, depression, stress, loneliness, and suicidal ideation, and a negative correlation with well-being. These results are in line with those of Camilleri et al. (2021) [19], who found that compulsive pornography use among university students in the US was related to mental states measured by depression, anxiety, and stress and also applied to the existing literature on loneliness [13,16,17,18].
Some important differences were found between men and women. In line with previous studies [2,25,34,42,46,76,77,78], young men reported higher scores than women in terms of cyber pornography addiction, but female participants’ PPU showed significant associations with suicidal ideation, while suicide plans were not significant in the case of male participants. Moreover, the multiple regression model results revealed that PPU and its interaction with gender (acting as a moderator) were significantly linked to suicidal ideation. Those females who had higher PPU scores were also more likely to have suicidal ideation, while for males no such effect was observed.
Due to the fact that men are accepted to be the main consumers of pornographic material, so far, the majority of the existing research has focused on male participants. Thus, it is not easy to generalize our findings or compare them with the previous literature. As mentioned previously, Shirk et al. [66] could not find any association between PPU and suicidal thoughts. Although their study focused only on male veterans, this would confirm the results of our study. Additionally, military veterans could be particularly relevant, as they experience higher levels of PPU and distress compared to non-veteran men [79].
Similarly, when mental states (stress, anxiety, depression) and life satisfaction were used as dependent variables instead of suicidal ideation, PPU was a significant predictor, and its interaction with gender was significant for stress, anxiety, and life satisfaction. In particular, those females who had higher levels of PPU showed higher stress, anxiety, and lower life satisfaction. For males, on the other hand, this was not the case. In addition, no interaction effect was found for depression, which is reasonable since no gender differences were observed for depression. Therefore, being a female and having high scores in PPU shows parallel links with psychological distress, suicidal ideation, and lower life satisfaction.
However, it is important to bear in mind that the lower occurrence of common mental health issues in men should not be directly assumed to indicate a lesser overall experience of these conditions [80]. The limited reports could be influenced by dominant ideas of hegemonic masculinity [80,81], which are based on active agency, rigidity, strength, and not showing or sharing feelings. For example, a study involving men living in rural communities in Canada revealed a paradoxical observation where higher rates of suicide and substance abuse were present alongside lower levels of depression and stress [82]. Here, stoicism may appear as an obstacle preventing men from accepting their struggles [81]. Additionally, this pattern may be different for males, who are more open to seeking help on these issues. For example, a case study of a 25-year-old single male student with an inability to stop watching porn reported that the subject experienced deteriorated relationships, poor sleep, reduced academic performance, shame, and guilt due to the PPU. This young male, who voluntarily decided to seek help and who applied to a psychiatric clinic for that purpose, reported having recurrent suicidal thoughts [83].
Another explanation for observing associations between PPU and strong negative emotions, including suicide, for females but not for males, could be the way in which the mainstream porn industry is constructed today, as its main focus is on male pleasure [84] and because of the attitudes women possess towards the sex industry and sexually explicit material in general. For instance, Shaughnessy et al. (2010) [78] showed that women report more negative attitudes towards pornography. In fact, many engaged or married women tend to condemn using porn to some extent and perceive it as being disloyal [85]. Another study shows that when exposed to the same sexual material, female participants demonstrate more negative emotional responses, suggesting notable gender differences in terms of interpretation [86]. Additionally, women have a tendency to underestimate their pornography use compared to an overestimation on the part of men, again reflecting different viewpoints [87].
Shame and guilt, as well as their interaction, experienced by women due to the consumption of pornographic material might also be a trigger for developing suicidal ideation [88]. However, it is important to highlight that there is a great deal of variation among young people on how they relate to these issues. Possibly, all interpretations should take into account the relationship to hegemonic masculinity [89].
Some other problematic and potentially addictive behaviors, such as gaming and gambling, have also been linked to suicidality among young adults [90,91,92,93]. For instance, a cross-sectional study conducted on young adults in Great Britain showed that gambling is linked to suicide attempts for both genders [93]. Similarly, gaming has been linked to suicidal ideation, mediated by emotion and moderated by hope [90]. These studies, together with our results, highlight the fact that the behavioral patterns associated with addictive components are extremely risky, especially for younger age categories, and may have serious consequences, including suicidality.
The role of loneliness was also explored in the present study. In addition to correlational findings, the results of the multiple regression analysis showed that loneliness and PPU were both significant predictors of suicidal ideation. The relationship between loneliness and suicidality is a well-established one in the literature [55,94,95,96], and our findings are in line with them. As previously reported by Batigun (2005) [97], loneliness is an age-dependent factor and is common among young adults. Interestingly, the interaction effect with gender (acting as a moderator) on suicidal ideation was observed only with regard to PPU, and not in the case of loneliness, despite the significant gender differences (males scored significantly higher than females). Likewise, loneliness was a significant predictor of mental states (stress, anxiety, depression) and life satisfaction, but an aspect that does not show any interaction with gender. Experiencing elevated levels of loneliness therefore appears as a critical factor that should be considered in the context of mental health, regardless of gender.
Ahorsu et al. [98], during their review on problematic porn use and cross-cultural differences, pointed out that European, American, and Oceanian countries have more up-to-date and in-depth literature on pornography, more liberal beliefs and attitudes, as well as specialized treatment protocols and facilities. Asian countries are similar producers of the literature on this topic; however, they are conservative in their beliefs and attitudes toward pornography, which has limited options and specialized treatment facilities for people with PPU. African countries share similarities with Asian countries except for the paucity of the literature on pornography. In our study instead, regarding nationality/cultural differences, no significant results were obtained, either for suicidality or for PPU in a comparison of Italian and international students. However, the former had higher loneliness and stress levels, together with lower levels of life satisfaction. Previous studies have found that international students run a higher risk of developing mental issues compared to domestic ones [99,100,101], which seems to contradict our results. However, it is important to note that our sample included both long-term and short-term international students and did not explore the potential differences between them. The literature shows that long-term international students compared to short-term international students (exchange students participating in Erasmus+, ULISSE programs, etc.) face more psychological problems and difficulties [102,103]. This may explain why, in our sample, Italian domestic students had a worse psychological profile in general.

Limitations

This study suffers from several limitations. First, it is important to highlight that our study had a cross-sectional design, which makes it impossible to infer any causal relation between variables.
Second, the PPU assessment tool used in this study, CYPAT, as well as other measurement tools developed in recent years, usually investigate different components of PPU, such as frequency and intensity, but not the consumed content of pornography, such as violent, nonviolent, or degrading. This may appear as a limitation of this study since the various types of content are associated with different factors (e.g., sexual aggression) [15].
In addition, the present study highlights important gender differences with regard to the investigated variables while lacking information about sexual orientation. As highlighted by Borgogna et al. (2022) [104], sexual minorities report higher levels of PPU compared to heterosexual males and females. Thus, future studies should consider gender and sexual orientation together.
Due to the sensitive nature of the research topic, an anonymous online survey was chosen as a data collection method. All participants were asked to sign a consent form in which they were informed about the anonymity, confidentiality, and security of their data. However, due to the self-report design, it is possible that collected data include some biases, which potentially could distort the results. It is also possible that some participants may have provided non-complete information as a result of the delicate nature of the topics under consideration. For these reasons, the results should be interpreted carefully.
Another important point to bear in mind is that since the legal use and accessibility of pornography will vary across countries, cross-cultural studies should replicate our findings by comparing the different environments in which pornography is manufactured and consumed. Future research may also include detailed qualitative research to obtain a more comprehensive view of PPU and suicide relationships on the part of young individuals.
Additionally, using a longitudinal design for future studies may be beneficial to follow how the temporal relationship between PPU and mental health outcomes changes over the years. Finally, it is crucial to consider factors such as religion or moral values when studying PPU, as they may affect the individual’s approach to pornography in general [6,105,106].

5. Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first one focusing explicitly on the relationship between PPU and suicidality. Our sample was composed of young adults studying in Italy. Despite lower levels of reported PPU compared to males, a significant relationship was found for female participants only. In addition, the PPU scores of females were linked to loneliness, stress, anxiety, depression, and life satisfaction. For males, on the other hand, PPU scores were linked to loneliness, stress, anxiety, and depression. Therefore, it can be stated that females are at particular risk of developing suicidal ideation due to PPU. Moreover, loneliness plays a crucial role as a predictor of suicidality for both genders. Future research should pay more attention to how young women may be influenced by exposure to sexually explicit materials, always taking into account the role of loneliness. Another idea could be to investigate more ‘female-friendly’ sexual materials, such as audio erotica to check if the results are consistent. Finally, the findings of our study should be replicated for older women, as they are the least studied category in the given context.
These findings, after being further explored by future studies, could have a significant impact on structuring new mental health protocols and subsequent clinical practice. For example, in public health policies, support pathways for addiction and/or suicidality could be created by taking gender differences into account. As suggested by Antons et al. [107], incorporating them into protocols structured around them and based on CBT (cognitive behavior therapy) could lead to more specific and effective programs to support people experiencing these issues. The topics discussed in this article represent taboos in our society. Regarding prevention, one could therefore try to solicit people’s awareness to the population both about the association between PPU and suicidal thoughts (allowing it to be identified as a warning signal for seeking psychological support) and about gender differences in pornography consumption and the cultural context in which these issues are immersed. In clinical practice, one option might be to work on fostering awareness and emotional expression. One way might be using self-help groups [108] to share experiences, reduce the sense of loneliness and isolation, and promote sociality.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. D.D.L. conceived of the presented idea; Data collection and the first draft of the manuscript were performed by M.A.; L.R. run data analysis; S.C. supervised the study, contributed to the first draft and the revisions on the manuscript; D.D.L. and N.T. commented on previous versions of manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Ethical Committee for Psychological Research of the University of Padua approved the study (Protocol No. 5077).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants for being included in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in OSF at https://osf.io/9udz5/ (accessed on 30 July 2024).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lewczuk, K.; Wójcik, A.; Gola, M. Increase in the prevalence of online pornography use: Objective data analysis from the period between 2004 and 2016 in Poland. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2021, 51, 1157–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kor, A.; Zilcha-Mano, S.; Fogel, Y.A.; Mikulincer, M.; Reid, R.C.; Potenza, M.N. Psychometric development of the Problematic Pornography Use Scale. Addict. Behav. 2014, 39, 861–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lau, W.K.; Ngan, L.H.; Chan, R.C.; Wu, W.K.; Lau, B.W. Impact of COVID-19 on pornography use: Evidence from big data analyses. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0260386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sallie, S.N.; Ritou, V.J.; Bowden-Jones, H.; Voon, V. Assessing online gaming and pornography consumption patterns during COVID-19 isolation using an online survey: Highlighting distinct avenues of problematic internet behavior. Addict. Behav. 2021, 123, 107044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pornhub Insights. Coronavirus Insight. 2020. Available online: https://www.pornhub.com/insights/corona-virus (accessed on 30 July 2024).
  6. Grubbs, J.B.; Lee, B.N.; Hoagland, K.C.; Kraus, S.W.; Perry, S.L. Addiction or transgression? Moral incongruence and self-reported problematic pornography use in a nationally representative sample. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 2020, 8, 936–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fernandez, D.; Griffiths, M.D. Psychometric Instruments for Problematic Pornography Use: A Systematic Review. Eval. Health Prof. 2019, 44, 111–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cooper, A. Sexuality and the Internet: Surfing into the New Millennium. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 1998, 1, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bőthe, B.; Tóth-Király, I.; Bella, N.; Potenza, M.N.; Demetrovics, Z.; Orosz, G. Why do people watch pornography? The motivational basis of pornography use. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 2021, 35, 172–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pouralijan, Z.; Bőthe, B.; Farnam, F. Pornography use, demographic and sexual health characteristics among university students: A gender-based comparative study of non-users, non-problematic users, and problematic users. Reprod. Health 2024, 21, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wizła, M.; Lewczuk, K. Compulsive sexual behavior disorder and problematic pornography use in the context of social ties. Curr. Addict. Rep. 2024, 11, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ince, C.; Fontenelle, L.F.; Carter, A.; Albertella, L.; Tiego, J.; Chamberlain, S.R.; Rotaru, K. Clarifying and extending our understanding of problematic pornography use through descriptions of the lived experience. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 18193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Okabe, Y.; Ito, D. Psychometric Properties of the Problematic Pornography Use Scale in a Japanese Sample. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2021, 51, 1221–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bőthe, B.; Tóth-Király, I.; Zsila, Á.; Griffiths, M.D.; Demetrovics, Z.; Orosz, G. The development of the problematic pornography consumption scale (PPCS). J. Sex Res. 2017, 55, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wright, P.K.; Tokunaga, R.S.; Kraus, A. A Meta-Analysis of Pornography Consumption and Actual Acts of Sexual Aggression in General Population Studies. J. Commun. 2016, 66, 183–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cardoso, J.; Ramos, C.; Brito, J.; Almeida, T.C. Predictors of pornography use: Difficulties in emotion regulation and loneliness. J. Sex. Med. 2022, 19, 620–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Butler, M.S.; Pereyra, S.; Draper, T.C.; Leonhardt, N.D.; Skinner, K.C. Pornography Use and Loneliness: A Bidirectional Recursive Model and Pilot Investigation. J. Sex Marital Ther. 2017, 44, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yoder, V.C.; Virden, T.B.; Amin, K. Internet Pornography and Loneliness: An Association? Sex. Addict. Compulsivity J. Treat. Prev. 2005, 12, 19–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Camilleri, C.; Perry, J.T.; Sammut, S. Compulsive internet pornography use and mental health: A cross-sectional study in a sample of University students in the United States. Front. Psychol. 2021, 11, 613244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cacioppo, M.; Gori, A.; Schimmenti, A.; Baiocco, R.; Laghi, F.; Caretti, V. Cyber Pornography Addiction Test [Dataset]. 2018. Available online: https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Ft66951-000 (accessed on 30 July 2024).
  21. Grubbs, J.B.; Volk, F.; Exline, J.J.; Pargament, K.I. Internet pornography use: Perceived addiction, psychological distress, and the validation of a brief measure. J. Sex Marital Ther. 2013, 41, 83–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Spenhoff, M.; Frieling, H.; Hartmann, U.; Kobs, J. Hypersexual Behavior in an Online Sample of Males: Associations with Personal Distress and Functional Impairment. J. Sex. Med. 2013, 10, 2996–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Egan, V.; Parmar, R. Dirty habits? Online pornography use, personality, Obsessionality, and Compulsivity. J. Sex Marital Ther. 2013, 39, 394–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Whelan, G.; Brown, J. Pornography addiction: An exploration of the association between use, perceived addiction, erectile dysfunction, premature (Early) ejaculation, and sexual satisfaction in males aged 18-44 years. J. Sex. Med. 2021, 18, 1582–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Blais-Lecours, S.; Vaillancourt-Morel, M.; Sabourin, S.; Godbout, N. Cyberpornography: Time Use, Perceived Addiction, Sexual Functioning, and Sexual Satisfaction. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2016, 19, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Peter, J.; Valkenburg, P.M. Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit internet material and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Hum. Commun. Res. 2009, 35, 171–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Manning, J.C. The Impact of Internet Pornography on Marriage and the Family: A Review of the Research. Sex. Addict. Compulsivity J. Treat. Prev. 2006, 13, 131–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sommantico, M.; Gioia, F.; Boursier, V.; Iorio, I.; Parrello, S. Body Image, Depression, and Self-Perceived Pornography Addiction in Italian Gay and Bisexual Men: The Mediating Role of Relationship Satisfaction. Mediterr. J. Clin. Psychol. 2021, 9, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Duffy, A.; Dawson, D.L.; Das Nair, R. Pornography addiction in adults: A systematic review of definitions and reported impact. J. Sex. Med. 2016, 13, 760–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reid, R.C.; Karim, R.; McCrory, E.; Carpenter, B.N. Self-reported differences on measures of executive function and Hypersexual behavior in a patient and community sample of men. Int. J. Neurosci. 2010, 120, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Castro-Calvo, J.; Cervigón-Carrasco, V.; Ballester-Arnal, R.; Giménez-García, C. Cognitive processes related to problematic pornography use (PPU): A systematic review of experimental studies. Addict. Behav. Rep. 2021, 13, 100345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Marino, C.; Melodia, F.; Pivetta, E.; Mansueto, G.; Palmieri, S.; Caselli, G.; Canale, N.; Vieno, A.; Conti, F.; Spada, M.M. Desire thinking and craving as predictors of problematic Internet pornography use in women and men. Addict. Behav. 2023, 136, 107469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jacobs, T.M.; Geysemans, B.; Van Hal, G.; Glazemakers, I.; Fog-Poulsen, K.; Vermandel, A.; De Wachter, S.; De Win, G. Associations Between Online Pornography Consumption and Sexual Dysfunction in Young Men: Multivariate Analysis Based on an International Web-Based Survey. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021, 7, e32542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mauer-Vakil, D.; Bahji, A. The addictive nature of compulsive sexual behaviors and problematic online pornography consumption: A review. Can. J. Addict. 2020, 11, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gola, M.; Wordecha, M.; Sescousse, G.; Lew-Starowicz, M.; Kossowski, B.; Wypych, M.; Makeig, S.; Potenza, M.N.; Marchewka, A. Can pornography be addictive? An fMRI study of men seeking treatment for problematic pornography use. Neuropsychopharmacology 2017, 42, 2021–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Love, T.; Laier, C.; Brand, M.; Hatch, L.; Hajela, R. Neuroscience of internet pornography addiction: A review and update. Behav. Sci. 2015, 5, 388–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Voon, V.; Mole, T.B.; Banca, P.; Porter, L.; Morris, L.; Mitchell, S.; Lapa, T.R.; Karr, J.; Harrison, N.A.; Potenza, M.N.; et al. Neural correlates of sexual cue reactivity in individuals with and without compulsive sexual behaviors. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Petry, N.M.; Zajac, K.; Ginley, M.K. Behavioral Addictions as Mental Disorders: To Be or Not To Be? Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2018, 14, 399–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Renate, K. Big Porn + Big Pharma: Where the Pornography Industry Meets the Ideology of Medicalization. In Big Porn Inc: Exposing the Harms of the Global Pornography Industry (He); Reist, M.T., Bray, A., Eds.; Spinifex Press: North Geelong, Australia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  42. Harper, C.; Hodgins, D.C. Examining Correlates of Problematic Internet Pornography Use Among University Students. J. Behav. Addict. 2016, 5, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ley, D.; Prause, N.; Finn, P.R. The Emperor Has No Clothes: A Review of the ‘Pornography Addiction’ Model. Curr. Sex. Health Rep. 2014, 6, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Griffiths, M.D. Internet sex addiction: A review of empirical research. Addict. Res. Theory 2012, 20, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lim, M.S.; Agius, P.A.; Carrotte, E.R.; Vella, A.M.; Hellard, M.E. Young Australians’ use of pornography and associations with sexual risk behaviors. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 2017, 41, 438–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sinković, M.; Štulhofer, A.; Božić, J. Revisiting the association between pornography use and risky sexual behaviors: The role of early exposure to pornography and sexual sensation seeking. J. Sex Res. 2013, 50, 633–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Smith, M. Youth viewing sexually explicit material online: Addressing the elephant on the screen. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy 2012, 10, 62–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Peter, J.; Valkenburg, P.M. The Influence of Sexually Explicit Internet Material on Sexual Risk Behavior: A Comparison of Adolescents and Adults. J. Health Commun. 2011, 16, 750–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Peter, J.; Valkenburg, P.M. Adolescents’ exposure to a sexualized media environment and their notions of women as sex objects. Sex Roles 2007, 56, 381–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Peter, J.; Valkenburg, P.M. Adolescents and pornography: A review of 20 years of research. J. Sex Res. 2016, 53, 509–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Holt, T.J.; Bossler, A.M.; May, D.C. Low self-control, deviant peer associations, and juvenile cyberdeviance. Am. J. Crim. Justice 2012, 37, 378–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Efrati, Y. Problematic and non-problematic pornography use and compulsive sexual behaviors among understudied populations: Children and adolescents. Curr. Addict. Rep. 2020, 7, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rømer Thomsen, K.; Callesen, M.B.; Hesse, M.; Kvamme, T.L.; Pedersen, M.M.; Pedersen, M.U.; Voon, V. Impulsivity traits and addiction-related behaviors in youth. J. Behav. Addict. 2018, 7, 317–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Claes, L.; Islam, M.A.; Fagundo, A.B.; Jimenez-Murcia, S.; Granero, R.; Agüera, Z.; Rossi, E.; Menchón, J.M.; Fernández-Aranda, F. The relationship between non-suicidal self- injury and the UPPS-P impulsivity facets in eating disorders and healthy controls. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Khatcherian, E.; Zullino, D.; De Leo, D.; Achab, S. Feelings of Loneliness: Understanding the Risk of Suicidal Ideation in Adolescents with Internet Addiction. A Theoretical Model to Answer to a Systematic Literature Review, without Results. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kim, K.; Ryu, E.; Chon, M.; Yeun, E.J.; Choi, S.Y.; Seo, J.G.; Nam, B.J. Internet addiction in Korean adolescents and its relation to depression and suicidal ideation: A questionnaire survey. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2006, 43, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Testa, G.; Mestre-Bach, G.; Chiclana Actis, C.; Potenza, M.N. Problematic pornography use in adolescents: From prevention to intervention. Curr. Addict. Rep. 2023, 10, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. World Health Organization [WHO]. Suicide Worldwide in 2019; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  59. Kim, K.M.; Kim, H.; Choi, J.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, J.W. What types of internet services make adolescents addicted? Correlates of problematic internet Use. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2020, 16, 1031–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kim, B.; Chang, S.M.; Park, J.E.; Seong, S.J.; Won, S.H.; Cho, M.J. Prevalence, correlates, psychiatric comorbidities, and suicidality in a community population with problematic internet use. Psychiatry Res. 2016, 244, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Harris, K.M.; McLean, J.A.; Sheffield, J. Suicidal and Online: How Do Online Behaviors Inform Us of This High-Risk Population? Death Stud. 2013, 38, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Daine, K.; Hawton, K.; Singaravelu, V.; Stewart, A.; Simkin, S.; Montgomery, P. The power of the web: A systematic review of studies of the influence of the internet on self-harm and suicide in young people. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e77555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Mitchell, K.J.; Ybarra, M.L. Online behavior of youth who engage in self-harm provides clues for preventive intervention. Prev. Med. 2007, 45, 392–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mathy, R.M.; Cooper, A. The duration and frequency of Internet use in a nonclinical sample: Suicidality, behavioral problems, and treatment histories. Psychother. Theory Res. Pract. Train. 2003, 40, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Valenciano-Mendoza, E.; Fernández-Aranda, F.; Granero, R.; Gómez-Peña, M.; Moragas, L.; Mora-Maltas, B.; Håkansson, A.; Menchón, J.M.; Jiménez-Murcia, S. Prevalence of Suicidal Behavior and Associated Clinical Correlates in Patients with Behavioral Addictions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shirk, S.D.; Saxena, A.; Park, D.; Kraus, S.W. Predicting problematic pornography use among male returning US veterans. Addict. Behav. 2021, 112, 106647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sharpe, M.; Mead, D. Problematic pornography use: Legal and health policy considerations. Curr. Addict. Rep. 2021, 8, 556–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wongpakaran, N.; Wongpakaran, T.; Pinyopornpanish, M.; Simcharoen, S.; Suradom, C.; Varnado, P.; Kuntawong, P. Development and validation of a 6-item revised UCLA loneliness scale (RULS-6) using Rasch analysis. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2020, 25, 233–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zammuner, V.L. Italians’ social and emotional loneliness: The results of five studies. Int. J. Educ. Pedagog. Sci. 2008, 2, 416–428. [Google Scholar]
  70. Russell, D.; Peplau, L.A.; Ferguson, M.L. Developing a measure of loneliness. J. Personal. Assess. 1978, 42, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Bottesi, G.; Ghisi, M.; Altoè, G.; Conforti, E.; Melli, G.; Sica, C. The Italian version of the depression anxiety stress scales-21: Factor structure and psychometric properties on community and clinical samples. Compr. Psychiatry 2015, 60, 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Henry, J.D.; Crawford, J.R. The short-form version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 2005, 44, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lovibond, P.F.; Lovibond, S.H. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav. Res. Ther. 1995, 33, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Di Fabio, A.; Gori, A. Measuring adolescent life satisfaction. J. Psychoeduc. Assess. 2015, 34, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Diener, E.; Emmons, R.A.; Larsen, R.W.; Griffin, S. The Satisfaction with Life Scale. J. Personal. Assess. 1985, 49, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bőthe, B.; Nagy, L.; Koós, M.; Demetrovics, Z.; Potenza, M.N.; Kraus, S.W. Problematic pornography use across countries, genders, and sexual orientations: Insights from the International Sex Survey and comparison of different assessment tools. Addiction 2024, 119, 928–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Russo, A.; Santoro, G.; Schimmenti, A. Interpersonal Guilt and Problematic Online Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Emotion Dysregulation. Clin. Neuropsychiatry 2022, 19, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Shaughnessy, K.; Byers, E.S.; Walsh, L. Online sexual activity experience of heterosexual students: Gender similarities and differences. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2010, 40, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Borgogna, N.C.; Kraus, S.W.; Grubbs, J.B. Military veterans’ psychological distress associated with problematic pornography viewing. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2021, 20, 2194–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gough, B.; Robertson, S.; Luck, H. Engendered expressions of anxiety: Men’s emotional communications with women and other men. Front. Sociol. 2021, 6, 697356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Balcombe, L.; De Leo, D. The Potential Impact of Adjunct Digital Tools and Technology to Help Distressed and Suicidal Men: An Integrative Review. Front. Psychol. 2022, 12, 796371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Herron, R.V.; Ahmadu, M.; Allan, J.A.; Waddell, C.M.; Roger, K. “Talk about it”: Changing masculinities and mental health in rural places? Soc. Sci. Med. 2020, 258, 113099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Olose, E.O.; Busari, C.O.; Anake, G.A.; Adubina, B.I.; Ogundare, T. Pornography Addiction in a University Undergraduate: A Case Report. World J. Med. Sci. 2021, 18, 97–102. Available online: https://www.idosi.org/wjms/18(2)21/7.pdf (accessed on 30 July 2024).
  84. Jensen, R.; Dines, G. The content of mass-marketed pornography. In Pornography: The Production and Consumption of Inequality; Dines, G., Jensen, R., Russo, A., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 1998; pp. 65–100. [Google Scholar]
  85. Carroll, J.S.; Busby, D.M.; Willoughby, B.J.; Brown, C.C. The porn gap: Differences in men’s and women’s pornography patterns in couple relationships. J. Couple Relatsh. Ther. 2016, 16, 146–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Allen, M.; Emmers-Sommer, T.M.; D’Alessio, D.; Timmerman, L.; Hanzal, A.; Korus, J. The connection between the physiological and psychological reactions to sexually explicit materials: A literature summary using meta-analysis. Commun. Monogr. 2007, 74, 541–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hen, M.; Karsh, N.; Langer, E.; Shechter, R. Gender differences in implicit exposure to cyber-pornography. J. Soc. Psychol. 2020, 160, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kealy, D.; Treeby, M.S.; Rice, S.M. Shame, guilt, and suicidal thoughts: The interaction matters. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 2021, 60, 414–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Johansson, T.; Hammaré, N. Hegemonic masculinity and pornography: Young people’s attitudes toward and relations to pornography. J. Men’s Stud. 2007, 15, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Xie, Y.; Yang, Q.; Lei, F. The relationship of internet gaming addiction and suicidal ideation among adolescents: The mediating role of negative emotion and the moderating role of hope. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Erevik, E.K.; Landrø, H.; Mattson, Å.L.; Kristensen, J.H.; Kaur, P.; Pallesen, S. Problem gaming and suicidality: A systematic literature review. Addict. Behav. Rep. 2022, 15, 100419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Marionneau, V.; Nikkinen, J. Gambling-related suicides and suicidality: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Front. Psychiatry 2022, 13, 980303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wardle, H.; McManus, S. Suicidality and gambling among young adults in Great Britain: Results from a cross-sectional online survey. Lancet Public Health 2021, 6, e39–e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. McClelland, H.; Evans, J.J.; Nowland, R.; Ferguson, E.; O’Connor, R.C. Loneliness as a predictor of suicidal ideation and behaviour: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 274, 880–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Calati, R.; Ferrari, C.; Brittner, M.; Oasi, O.; Olié, E.; Carvalho, A.F.; Courtet, P. Suicidal thoughts and behaviors and social isolation: A narrative review of the literature. J. Affect. Disord. 2019, 245, 653–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Mushtaq, R. Relationship between loneliness, psychiatric disorders and physical health? A review on the psychological aspects of loneliness. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2014, 8, WE01–WE04. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Batigün, D.A. Suicide probability: An assessment terms of reasons for living, hopelessness and loneliness. Turk Psikiyatr. Derg. 2005, 16, 29–39. Available online: https://www.turkpsikiyatri.com/Summary?Id=611 (accessed on 30 July 2024).
  98. Ahorsu, D.K.; Adjorlolo, S.; Nurmala, I.; Ruckwongpatr, K.; Strong, C.; Lin, C. Problematic porn use and cross-cultural differences: A brief review. Curr. Addict. Rep. 2023, 10, 572–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Brunsting, N.C.; Zachry, C.; Liu, J.; Bryant, R.; Fang, X.; Wu, S.; Luo, Z. Sources of perceived social support, social-emotional experiences, and psychological well-being of international students. J. Exp. Educ. 2019, 89, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Poyrazli, S.; Kavanaugh, P.R.; Baker, A.; Al-Timimi, N. Social support and demographic correlates of Acculturative stress in international students. J. Coll. Couns. 2004, 7, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mori, S.C. Addressing the mental health concerns of international students. J. Couns. Dev. 2000, 78, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Cipolletta, S.; Mercurio, A.; Pezzetta, R. Perceived social support and well-being of international students at an Italian University. J. Int. Stud. 2021, 12, 613–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kim, Y.K.; Maleku, A.; Lemieux, C.M.; Du, X.; Chen, Z. Behavioral health risk and resilience among international students in the United States: A study of socio-demographic differences. J. Int. Stud. 2019, 9, 282–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Borgogna, N.C.; Griffin, K.R.; Grubbs, J.B.; Kraus, S.W. Understanding differences in problematic pornography use: Considerations for gender and sexual orientation. J. Sex. Med. 2022, 19, 1290–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Mestre-Bach, G.; Blycker, G.R.; Actis, C.C.; Brand, M.; Potenza, M.N. Religion, Morality, Ethics, and Problematic Pornography Use. Curr. Addict. Rep. 2021, 8, 568–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Patterson, R.; Price, J. Pornography, religion, and the happiness gap: Does pornography impact the actively religious differently? J. Sci. Study Relig. 2012, 51, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Antons, S.; Engel, J.; Briken, P.; Krüger, T.H.; Brand, M.; Stark, R. Treatments and interventions for compulsive sexual behavior disorder with a focus on problematic pornography use: A preregistered systematic review. J. Behav. Addict. 2022, 11, 643–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Roza, T.H.; Noronha, L.T.; Shintani, A.O.; Massuda, R.; Lobato, M.I.; Kessler, F.H.; Passos, I.C. Treatment approaches for problematic pornography use: A systematic review. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2023, 53, 645–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Graphic representation of the model derived by the regression analysis.
Figure 1. Graphic representation of the model derived by the regression analysis.
Ijerph 21 01228 g001
Table 1. Samples’ Characteristics.
Table 1. Samples’ Characteristics.
Factor RespondentsN (%)
Gender
            Female202 (61%)
            Male120 (36%)
            Non-binary8 (2%)
            Prefer not to say2 (1%)
Group
            Italian178 (54%)
            International154 (46%)
Field of Study
            School of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine13 (4%)
            School of Economics and Political Science15 (5%)
            Law School12 (4%)
            School of Engineering37 (11%)
            School of Medicine15 (5%)
            School of Psychology108 (33%)
            School of Science66 (20%)
            School of Human and Social Sciences and Cultural Heritage28 (8%)
            Others39 (12%)
Table 2. Descriptive Statistics of Questionnaires’ Scores.
Table 2. Descriptive Statistics of Questionnaires’ Scores.
Cronbach’s AlphaMeanStd. DeviationSkewnessKurtosis
CYPAT0.853.945.182.0975.421
rULS-60.8313.453.760.228−0.538
DASS-210.8615.049.510.488−0.431
SWLS0.8621.756.46−0.289−0.571
Table 3. Gender differences in the present study variables.
Table 3. Gender differences in the present study variables.
ScaleGenderMeant-Valuedfp-Value
Cohen’s d
CYPAT (PPU)Female2.50−6.317191.32<0.001
−0.91
Male6.37
rULS-6 (loneliness)Female15.37−5.936196.67<0.001
−0.85
Male20.65
DASS-21 (stress)Female16.353.556320<0.001
0.40
Male12.52
DASS-21 (anxiety)Female10.133.0053200.003
0.34
Male7.15
DASS-21 (depression)Female12.77−0.1863200.852
−0.02
Male12.99
SWLS (life satisfaction)Female22.673.1363200.002
0.35
Male20.37
Table 4. Correlations between the main variables in the total sample and by gender.
Table 4. Correlations between the main variables in the total sample and by gender.
123456789
1. CYPAT-0.22 ***0.11 *0.14 *0.23 ***−0.18 **0.19 ***0.080.06
Males-0.33 ***0.23 *0.19 *0.28 **−0.040.11−0.06−0.04
Females-0.14 *0.26 ***0.30 ***0.28 ***−0.17 *0.32 ***0.19 **0.10
2. rULS-6--0.41***0.38 ***0.57 ***−0.48 ***0.26 ***0.20 ***0.11 *
Males--0.50 ***0.37 ***0.60 ***−0.42 ***0.36 ***0.120.14
Females--0.39 ***0.42 ***0.55 ***−0.51 ***0.24 ***0.26 ***0.14 *
3. DASS-21 (stress)---0.65 ***0.72 ***−0.41 ***0.32 ***0.27 ***0.14 *
Males---0.60 ***0.77 ***−0.50 ***0.33 ***0.25 **0.17
Females---0.65 ***0.70 ***−0.43 ***0.30 ***0.26 ***0.15 *
4. DASS-21 (anxiety)----0.60 ***−0.31 ***0.30 ***0.26 ***0.17 **
Males----0.56 ***−0.30 ***0.21 *0.20 *0.20 *
Females----0.63 ***−0.36 ***0.33 ***0.30 ***0.19 **
5. DASS-21 (depression)-----−0.57 ***0.38 ***0.24 ***0.14 *
Males-----−0.62 ***0.37 ***0.170.11
Females-----−0.55 ***0.37 ***0.29 ***0.19 **
6. SWLS------−0.31 ***−0.25 ***−0.13 *
Males------−0.15−0.11−0.04
Females------−0.42 ***-0.34 ***−0.19 **
7. Suicidal Ideation-------0.58 ***0.45 ***
Males-------0.55 ***0.44 ***
Females-------0.57 ***0.43 ***
8. Suicide Plan--------0.60 ***
Males--------0.58 ***
Females ---------
9. Suicide Attempt---------
Males---------
Females---------
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Note. CYPAT (Cyber Pornography Addiction Test); rULS-6 (6-item Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale); DASS-21 (Depression Anxiety Stress Scales Short Version); SWLS (Satisfaction With Life Scale).
Table 5. Multiple linear regression model with interaction.
Table 5. Multiple linear regression model with interaction.
CoefficientsEstimateStandard Error t-Valuep-Value
Intercept−0.240.23−1.020.31
CYPAT0.070.014.44<0.001
rULS-60.070.083.94<0.001
Gender (moderator)−0.130.37−0.350.72
CYPAT * Gender−0.070.02−3.36<0.001
RULS-6 * Gender0.010.030.330.74
R20.15
F(5, 316)11.57 <0.001
Note. Dependent variable: suicidal ideation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Altin, M.; De Leo, D.; Tribbia, N.; Ronconi, L.; Cipolletta, S. Problematic Pornography Use, Mental Health, and Suicidality among Young Adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21091228

AMA Style

Altin M, De Leo D, Tribbia N, Ronconi L, Cipolletta S. Problematic Pornography Use, Mental Health, and Suicidality among Young Adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024; 21(9):1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21091228

Chicago/Turabian Style

Altin, Mujde, Diego De Leo, Noemi Tribbia, Lucia Ronconi, and Sabrina Cipolletta. 2024. "Problematic Pornography Use, Mental Health, and Suicidality among Young Adults" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 21, no. 9: 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21091228

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop