Perception of Spatial Legibility and Its Association with Human Mobility Patterns: An Empirical Assessment of the Historical Districts in Rasht, Iran
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- What is the role of spatial configuration on the legibility of the studied historical district?
- What is the role of historical districts in shaping cognitive maps in the minds of pedestrians?
- To what extent are the objective and subjective factors of legibility influential in shaping human mobility patterns?
2. Research Design and Procedures
2.1. Space Syntax Method and Its Role on Objective Spatial Legibility
2.2. Cognitive Sketch Maps Method and Its Role on Subjective Spatial Legibility
2.3. Time-Lapse Method and Its Role on Human Mobility Patterns
2.4. Study Area
3. Results
3.1. Findings Obtained from Spatial Configuration Analysis
3.2. Findings Obtained from the Hand-Drawn Sketches
3.3. Findings Obtained from Human Mobility Patterns
4. Discussion
4.1. Understanding the Contribution of the Present Study
4.2. Implications for Policy and Planning
4.3. Limitations and Orientation of Future Studies
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Filomena, G.; Verstegen, J.A. A computational approach to ‘The Image of the City’. Cities 2019, 89, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.O. Spatial Configuration, Spatial Cognition and Spatial Behaviour: The Role of Architectural Intelligibility in Shaping Spatial Experience. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, London, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, N. Legibility and aesthetics in urban design. J. Urban Des. 2009, 14, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hillier, B. Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Penn, A. Space syntax and spatial cognition: Or why the axial line? Environ. Behav. 2003, 35, 30–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Long, Y.; Baran, P.K. Does intelligibility affect place legibility? Understanding the relationship between objective and subjective evaluations of the urban environment. Environ. Behav. 2012, 44, 616–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Groat, L.; Wang, D. Architectural Research Methods; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Batty, M. A New Theory of Space Syntax; CASA Working Papers; Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (UCL): London, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Ericson, J.D.; Chrastil, E.R.; Warren, W.H. Space syntax visibility graph analysis is not robust to changes in spatial and temporal resolution. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 2020, 48, 1478–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hillier, B. Centrality as a process: Accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids. Urban Des. Int. 1999, 4, 107–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karimi, K. Space syntax: Consolidation and transformation of an urban research field. J. Urban Des. 2018, 23, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Peponis, J.; Zimiring, C.; Choi, Y.K. Finding the building in wayfinding. Environ. Behav. 1990, 22, 555–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weisman, J. Evaluating architectural legibility: Way-finding in the built environment. Environ. Behav. 1981, 13, 189–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gärling, T.; Golledge, R.G. Environmental perception and cognition. In Advance in Environment, Behavior, and Design; Zube, E.H., Moore, G.T., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MD, USA, 1989; pp. 203–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golledge, R.G. Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Jacobs, M. The Production of Mindscapes: A Comprehensive Theory of Landscape Experience. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Swanwick, C. Society’s attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy 2009, 2, S62–S75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stobbelaar, D.J.; Pedroli, B. Perspectives on landscape identity: A conceptual challenge. Landsc. Res. 2011, 36, 321–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bell, S. Landscape: Pattern, Perception and Process; Routledge: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Hamburger, K.; Knauff, M. Odors can serve as landmarks in human wayfinding. Cogn. Sci. Multidiscip. J. 2019, 43, e12798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suomalainen, S.; Kahiluoto, H.; Pässilä, A.; Owens, A.; Holtham, C. Arts-aided recognition of citizens’ perceptions for urban open space management. Sustainability 2022, 14, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barone, T.; Eisner, W.E. Arts Based Research; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Adams, J.; Owens, A. Learning through Arts-Based Research; Intellect & Chicago Press: Bristol, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Shrivastava, P.; Ivanaj, V.; Ivanaj, S. Sustainable development and the arts. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 2016, 60, 23–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, M.; Bonetti, L. Geometrical distortions in geographical cognitive maps. J. Environ. Psychol. 2018, 55, 53–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, A. The measurement of tourist destination image: Applying a sketch map technique. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2005, 7, 279–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lynch, K. The Image of the City; The M.I.T Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1960. [Google Scholar]
- Downs, R.; Stea, D. Cognitive maps and spatial behavior: Process and products. In Image and Environment; Downs, R.M., Stea, D., Eds.; Wiley: Chicago, IL, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaplan, S. Cognitive maps in perception and thought. In Image and Environment; Downs, R.M., Stea, D., Eds.; Routledge: Chicago, IL, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Kitchin, R. Cognitive maps: What are they and why study them? J. Environ. Psychol. 1994, 14, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Portugali, J. The Construction of Cognitive Maps; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.O.; Penn, A. Linking the spatial syntax of cognitive maps to the spatial syntax of the environment. Environ. Behav. 2004, 36, 483–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondschein, A.; Blumenberg, E.; Taylor, B. Accessibility and cognition: The effect of transport mode on spatial knowledge. Urban Stud. 2010, 47, 845–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hillier, B. Studying cities to learn about minds: Some possible implications of space syntax for spatial cognition. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2012, 39, 12–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heft, H. Environment, cognition, and culture: Reconsidering the cognitive map. J. Environ. Psychol. 2013, 33, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olazabal, M.; Pascual, U. Use of fuzzy cognitive maps to study urban resilience and transformation. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2016, 18, 18–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCunn, L.; Gifford, R. Spatial navigation and place imageability in sense of place. Cities 2018, 74, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruns, C.; Chamberlain, B. The influence of landmarks and urban form on cognitive maps using virtual reality. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2019, 189, 296–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Askarizad, R.; Safari, R. The influence of social interactions on the behavioral patterns of the people in urban spaces (case study: The pedestrian zone of Rasht Municipality Square, Iran). Cities 2020, 101, 102687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, P.Y.; Chun, K.P.; Mijic, A.; Tan, M.L.; Liu, M.S.; Yetemen, O. A framework to evaluate the accessibility, visibility, and intelligibility of green-blue spaces (GBSs) related to pedestrian movement. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022, 69, 127494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karimi, K. A configurational approach to analytical urban design: ‘Space syntax’ methodology. Urban Des. Int. 2012, 17, 297–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, X.; Baran, P.K.; Moore, R. The role of space syntax in spatial cognition. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, 12–15 June 2007; pp. 129.1–129.6. [Google Scholar]
- Mahdzar, S.S.S.; Safari, H. Legibility as a result of geometry space: Analyzing and comparing hypothetical model and existing space by space syntax. Life Sci. J. 2014, 11, 309–317. [Google Scholar]
- Önder, D.E.; Gigi, Y. Reading urban spaces by the space-syntax method: A proposal for the South Haliç Region. Cities 2010, 27, 260–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peponis, J. The space syntax of intelligible communities. In Community Wayfinding: Pathways to Understanding; Hunter, R., Anderson, L., Belza, B., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safari, H.; FakouriMoridani, F. Syntactical analysis of the accessibility and sociability of a square in the Kuala Lumpur City Center. Front. Archit. Res. 2017, 6, 456–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soltani, S.; Gu, N.; Ochoa, J.; Sivam, A. The role of spatial configuration in moderating the relationship between social sustainability and urban density. Cities 2022, 121, 103519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wartmann, F.M.; Purves, R.S. What’s (not) on the map: Landscape features from participatory sketch mapping differ from local categories used in language. Land 2017, 6, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jiang, Z.; Sun, Y. Exploring the spatial image of traditional villages from the tourists’ hand-drawn sketches. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezaei Liapaee, S.; Askarizad, R.; Alborzi, F. Investigation of physical factors affecting the wayfinding of educational spaces children aged 7–12 years old in Rasht, north of Iran. Int. J. Pediatr. 2020, 8, 10689–10704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, N.; Nourian, P.; Pereira Roders, A.; Bunschoten, R.; Huang, W.; Wang, L. Investigating rural public spaces with cultural significance using morphological, cognitive and behavioural data. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Shepley, M.M. College campuses and student walkability: Assessing the impact of smartphone use on student perception and evaluation of urban campus routes. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meenar, M.; Flamm, B.; Keenan, K. Mapping the emotional experience of travel to understand cycle-transit user behavior. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meenar, M.; Afzalan, N.; Hajrasouliha, A. Analyzing Lynch’s city imageability in the digital age. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 2019, 42, 611–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donaire, J.A.; Galí, N.; Gulisova, B. Tracking visitors in crowded spaces using zenith images: Drones and time-lapse. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2020, 35, 100680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vroman, L.; Lagrange, T. Human movement in public spaces: The use and development of motion-oriented design strategies. Des. J. 2017, 20, S3252–S3261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carmona, M. Re-theorising contemporary public space: A new narrative and a new normative. J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain. 2015, 8, 373–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hillier, B.; Leaman, A.; Stansall, P.; Bedford, M. Space syntax. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 1976, 3, 147–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hillier, B.; Hanson, J. The Social Logic of Space; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Bafna, S. Space syntax: A brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environ. Behav. 2003, 35, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.O. The role of spatial configuration in spatial cognition. In Proceedings of the Third International Space Syntax Symposium 2001, Atlanta, GA, USA, 7–11 May 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Khotbehsara, E.M.; Safari, H.; Askarizad, R.; Somasundaraswaran, K. Investigating the role of spatial configuration on visitors’ spatial cognition in health-care spaces: Case studies in Gilan, Iran. Facilities 2022, 40, 617–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hillier, B. Space and spatiality: What the built environment needs from social theory. Build. Res. Inf. 2007, 36, 216–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hillier, B.; Hanson, J.; Burdett, R.; Peponis, J.; Penn, A. Creating life: Or, does architecture determine anything? Archit. Comport. Archit. Behav. 1987, 3, 233–250. [Google Scholar]
- Peponis, J.; Hajinikoloaou, E.; Livieratos, C.; Fatouros, D.A. The spatial core of urban culture. Ekistics 1989, 56, 43–55. [Google Scholar]
- Khotbehsara, E.M.; Askarizad, R.; Mehrinejad, M.; Nasab, S.N.; Somasundaraswaran, K. The impact of COVID-19 on visitors’ wayfinding within healthcare centers. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djenaihi, W.; Zemmouri, N.; Djenane, M.; van Nes, A. Noise and spatial configuration in Biskra, Algeria—A space syntax approach to understand the built environment for visually impaired people. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamu, C.; van Nes, A.; Garau, C. Bill Hillier’s legacy: Space syntax—A synopsis of basic concepts, measures, and empirical application. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, A. Depthmap: A program to perform visibility graph analysis. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Space Syntax 2001, Atlanta, GA, USA, 7–11 May 2001; pp. 31.1–31.9. [Google Scholar]
- Dalton, R.; Bafna, S. The syntactical image of the city: A reciprocal definition of spatial elements and spatial syntaxes. In Proceedings of the 4th International Space Syntax Symposium 2003, London, UK, 17–19 June 2003; pp. 59.1–59.22. [Google Scholar]
- Al Sayed, K.; Turner, A.; Hillier, B.; Lida, S.; Penn, A. Space Syntax Methodology, 4th ed.; Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Turner, A. Depthmap 4: A Researcher’s Handbook; University College London: London, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Blades, M. The reliability of data collected from sketch maps. J. Environ. Psychol. 1990, 10, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tversky, B. What does drawing reveal about thinking? In Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design; Gero, J., Tversky, B., Eds.; Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition: Sidney, Australia, 1990; pp. 93–101. [Google Scholar]
- Billinghurst, M.; Weghorst, S. The use of sketch maps to measure cognitive maps of virtual environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE Annual International Symposium on Virtual Reality 1995, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 11–15 March 1995; IEEE Press: Piscataway, NJ, USA; pp. 40–47. [Google Scholar]
- Coluccia, E.; Iosue, G.; Brandimonte, M.A. The relationship between map drawing and spatial orientation abilities: A study of gender differences. J. Environ. Psychol. 2007, 27, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coluccia, E.; Iosue, G.; Brandimonte, M.A. The role of visuo-spatial working memory in map learning: New findings from a map drawing paradigm. Psychol. Res. 2007, 71, 359–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brunyé, T.T.; Taylor, H.A. Extended experience benefits spatial mental model development with route but not survey descriptions. Acta Psychol. 2008, 127, 340–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brunyé, T.T.; Taylor, H.A. Working memory in developing and applying mental models from spatial descriptions. J. Mem. Lang. 2008, 58, 701–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jan, S.; Schwering, A.; Wang, J.; Chipofya, M. Ordering: A reliable qualitative information for the alignment of sketch and metric maps. Int. J. Cogn. Inform. Nat. Intell. 2014, 8, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwering, A.; Wang, J.; Chipofya, M.; Jan, S.; Li, R.; Broelemann, K. SketchMapia: Qualitative representations for the alignment of sketch and metric maps. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 2014, 14, 220–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gardony, A.L.; Taylor, H.A.; Brunyé, T.T. Gardony map drawing analyzer: Software for quantitative analysis of sketch maps. Behav. Res. Methods 2016, 48, 151–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aram, F.; Solgi, E.; Garcia, E.H.; Mohammadzadeh, D.; Mosavi, A.; Shamshirband, S. Design and validation of a computational program for analysing mental maps: Aram mental map analyzer. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marquart, H.; Schlink, U.; Ueberham, M. The planned and the perceived city: A comparison of cyclists’ and decision-makers’ views on cycling quality. J. Transp. Geogr. 2020, 82, 102602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fakhrulddin, H.S.; Al-Alwan, H.A.S.; Fadhil, A. Towards cultural sustainability: The potency of ‘The Thousand and One Nights’ in reviving the imageability of Baghdad city. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2022, 14, 101807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Askarizad, R.; Jinliao, H.; Jafari, S. The influence of COVID-19 on the societal mobility of urban spaces. Cities 2021, 119, 103388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhar, A.; Arnberger, A.; Brandenburg, C. Methods for visitor monitoring in recreational and protected areas: An overview. Monit. Manag. Visit. Flows Recreat. Prot. Areas 2002, 2001, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, W.; Li, H. Time-lapse photography applied to educational videos. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet), Yichang, China, 21–23 April 2012; pp. 3669–3672. [Google Scholar]
- Askarizad, R.; Safari, H.; Pourimanparast, M. The influence of organizing historical textures on citizenry satisfaction in the old texture neighbourhoods of Rasht. Emerg. Sci. J. 2017, 1, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, B. The image of the city out of the underlying scaling of city artifacts or locations. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2013, 103, 1552–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Askarizad, R.; Dadashpour, A.; Faghirnavaz, J.; He, J.; Safari, H. Organizing worn-out neighborhoods with the new-urbanism approach using mixed methods in Rudsar, northern Iran. Smart Sustain. Built Environ. 2021, 4, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, P.; Gu, N.; Yu, R.; Brisbin, C. Exploring the spatial pattern of historic Chinese towns and cities: A syntactical approach. Front. Archit. Res. 2021, 10, 598–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Askarizad, R.; He, J.; Khotbehsara, E.M. The legibility efficacy of historical neighborhoods in creating a cognitive map for citizens. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Günaydin, A.S.; Yücekaya, M. Evaluation of the history of cities in the context of spatial configuration to preview their future. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 59, 102202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moqadam, S.; Nubani, L. The impact of spatial changes of Shiraz’s historic district on perceived anti-social behavior. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmadpoor, N.; Smith, A. Spatial knowledge acquisition and mobile maps: The role of environmental legibility. Cities 2020, 101, 102700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safari, H.; FakouriMoridani, F.; Mahdzar, S. Influence of geometry on legibility: An explanatory design study of visitors at the Kuala Lumpur City Center. Front. Archit. Res. 2016, 5, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Paydar, M.; Kamani-Fard, A. Perceived legibility in relation to path choice of commuters in central business district. Urban Des. Int. 2016, 21, 213–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golledge, R.G.; Stimson, R. Spatial Behavior: A Geographic Perspective; Guilford: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- O’Neill, M.J. Evaluation of a conceptual model of architectural legibility. Environ. Behav. 1991, 23, 259–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Güngör, O.; Aslan, E.H. Defining urban design strategies: An analysis of Iskenderun city center’s imageability. Open House Int. 2020, 45, 407–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stülpnagel, R.V.; Frankenstein, J. Configurational salience of landmarks: An analysis of sketch maps using Space Syntax. Cogn. Process. 2015, 16, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Passini, R. Wayfinding design: Logic, application and some thoughts on universality. Des. Stud. 1996, 17, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.; Cao, L.; Li, N. Assessing the influence of repeated exposures and mental stress on human wayfinding performance in indoor environments using virtual reality technology. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2019, 39, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devlin, A.S. Wayfinding in healthcare facilities: Contributions from environmental psychology. Behav. Sci. 2014, 4, 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Askarizad, R.; He, J. Perception of Spatial Legibility and Its Association with Human Mobility Patterns: An Empirical Assessment of the Historical Districts in Rasht, Iran. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 15258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215258
Askarizad R, He J. Perception of Spatial Legibility and Its Association with Human Mobility Patterns: An Empirical Assessment of the Historical Districts in Rasht, Iran. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(22):15258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215258
Chicago/Turabian StyleAskarizad, Reza, and Jinliao He. 2022. "Perception of Spatial Legibility and Its Association with Human Mobility Patterns: An Empirical Assessment of the Historical Districts in Rasht, Iran" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 22: 15258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215258
APA StyleAskarizad, R., & He, J. (2022). Perception of Spatial Legibility and Its Association with Human Mobility Patterns: An Empirical Assessment of the Historical Districts in Rasht, Iran. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 15258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215258