1. Introduction
High voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission system is widely considered as having technical, economic and environmental benefits. The first electricity, generated by Thomas Alva Edison in the 1880s, was low-level DC [
1]. The first HVDC transmission was introduced in Sweden in 1950 and put into operation in 1954 [
2]. The HVDC transmission system has technical advantages in producing an asynchronous interconnection and long-distance bulk power delivery [
3,
4,
5]. There are also some other advantages of DC transmission: there is no reactive power loss in this system [
6,
7]; no bulky tower structure is needed [
8]; it does not require intermediate switching stations [
9]; and, skin and corona effects disappear in the transmission [
10]. As a result, the number of HVDC projects is steadily increasing, showing that HVDC technology plays a vital role in the power transmission system.
Insulation or line clearance is a big challenge for transmission systems. AC and DC voltage both can produce an electric field around the transmission line; the greater the magnitude of voltage, the greater the strength of the electric field. This explains why HVDC has a very strong electric field. When the electric field increases, it affects the electrons in the atomic orbitals and may cause atoms or molecules to polarize or release electrons. The maximum electric field that a dielectric material—for example, air—can withstand without conduction is known as the dielectric strength of that material, and is denoted by kV/m or kV/cm. When the electric field becomes more than the dielectric strength, breakdown happens and the air becomes a conductor, whereby electrons collide with the atomic or molecular structure, releasing more electrons that cause a further breakdown of the air. Large currents are possible at the breakdown. The dielectric strength of air at normal temperature and pressure is 30 kV/cm [
11]. After crossing this limit, air ionizes rapidly [
12,
13]. This ionization phenomenon can create an arc with any nearby obstacles. These obstacles can be any building or vegetation (e.g., a tree). In practice, many transmission lines run through forests. Although the lines have no direct contact with trees that grow beneath, there is a chance of producing an arc because of extremely high voltages [
14]. This situation may cause the blackout of the whole power system. To avoid this situation, there must be a minimum optimal distance between the HVDC transmission line and the tree. This distance is called the minimum vegetation clearance distance (MVCD). This paper focuses on the measurement of MVCD in the DC transmission system.
2. MVCD and Gallet Equation
A lot of work has previously been undertaken to find the minimum vegetation clearance distance (MVCD) in AC high voltage transmission systems. However, there has been no significant work carried out to calculate MVCD for HVDC transmission systems. The Gallet equation has been used by North American Reliability Corporation (NERC) to find the MVCD for the AC system. This method has the ability to consider different air gap geometries and non-standard atmospheric conditions. The critical flashover voltage (CFO) and gap factor are important in explaining the Gallet equation. The voltage at which a surge is 50% likely to cause a flashover is called CFO. The word “critical” here means that the rise time of the surge is at the value known to result in the lowest flashover voltage. The ratio of the CFO of a test object to the CFO of a rod-plane gap for the same spacing is known as the gap factor. For any given spacing, a rod-plane gap gives the lowest CFO voltage [
15]. This approach is well known for its conservatism and was used to design the first 500 kV and 765 kV lines in North America [
16]. The transient overvoltage factor is also considered in this equation. For 362 kV and above, 1.4 p.u. is selected as the overvoltage factor. There is no prominent information about MVCD calculation in the case of DC transmission in this equation. The Gallet equation is explained in [
17,
18,
19] and can be shown as:
where:
kw is defined as the factor that takes into account wet or dry conditions (dry = 1.0, wet = 0.96) and phase arrangement (multiply by 1.08 for outside phase) (e.g., for outside phase and wet conditions,
kw = 0.96 × 1.08 = 1.037).
kg is defined as the gap factor (1.3 for a conductor to large structure).
D is the strike distance (m).
CFOA is the CFO for the relative air density (kV).
δ is defined as the relative air density and is approximately equal to Equation (2) where
A is the altitude in km.
where
CFOs is the
CFO for standard atmospheric conditions (kV). Using (1)–(5), the value of D for a specific value of
CFOA can be computed using an iterative process [
17].
Equation (6) can be determined if the maximum switching overvoltage is set equal to the withstand voltage of the air gap (
CFOA–3σ).
where:
Vm is equal to the maximum switching overvoltage.
σ is the standard deviation of the air gap insulation.
CFOA is the critical flashover voltage of air gap insulation under non-standard atmospheric conditions.
The ratio (
σ/CFOA) in Equation (6) can be taken to be 0.05 based on the literature and can, therefore, be written as:
Using the value of
CFOA from Equation (9) in Equation (1), we have:
By using this equation, the required clearance distance for any air gap can be determined.
The above equation was used for determining the clearance distance between the vegetation and the conductor in case of AC transmission. However, it is possible to change DC voltage into AC-equivalent voltage. Equation (11) provides the AC-equivalent voltage value for any DC voltage value [
20].
For example, to find the MVCD at DC 500 kV, the AC equivalent voltage will be 613 kV.
We can then determine the MVCD value by using AC-equivalent voltage value in the Gallet equation.
The Gallet equation method has been explained in detail. Equating the magnitude of DC voltage to AC voltage with the help of a formula has also been discussed. We have performed Gallet equation calculations using Matlab in order to determine the MVCD.
Table 1 and
Table 2 show MVCD values at different voltages for a gap factor equal to 1 and altitude of 0 km.
3. Proposed Idea
A minimum vegetation clearance distance is essential to avoid flashover between trees and the HVDC conductor. Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) is motivated to establish its own rules for the determination of MVCD for the construction of 500 kV DC transmission lines. This paper proposes that MVCD values can be determined based on some defined rules.
The Gallet equation can be used for AC voltage for the determination of MVCD; however, by using Equation (11), DC voltage can be represented in terms of AC-equivalent voltage. In this way, the Gallet equation can also be used, via Matlab, for determining MVCD in the case of HVDC. This equation has not previously been used and tested for DC voltage. Therefore, in order to verify the equation in the case of DC voltage, experimentation is required. The comparison between the Gallet equation results (for DC voltages) and experimental results will provide verified MVCD values in the case of HVDC.
4. Experimental Setup
For MVCD measurement for a DC system, experimental work was undertaken at a maximum voltage of 60 kV DC. Although the central theme of this work is to calculate MVCD for a voltage of 500 kV DC, there are many restrictions to undertaking laboratory experiments at very high voltages. The main issue is that HVDC of 500 kV requires a high level of insulation. Another issue is that special regulatory permission is needed for performing such a high voltage experiment.
Therefore, this study is based on an experiment performed at different voltage levels ranging from 2.5 kV to 60 kV. At each level of voltage, the MVCD was measured. The graph of these measured MVCD values provided a clear picture of how MVCD values increase as voltage level increases. An equation based on these measured values could then be used to identify the MVCD at each voltage level.
A schematic of the experimental configuration is shown in
Figure 1. The implementation of this configuration is shown in
Figure 2. It can be seen in
Figure 1 that a power supply of 100 kV was used with 2 mA to energize the conductor. A capacitor bank was also used parallel to the power supply for its protection. This capacitor bank consisted of two capacitors, each with a capacity of 30 kV. These were connected in series to make a 60-kV capacitor bank. This capacitor bank was first charged from 2.5 kV to 60 kV, and then used to supply power to the conductor. Each voltage level created an electric field of different strength around the conductor.
The tree and the speed control motor can also be seen in
Figure 1 and
Figure 2. The tree was placed on a moving platform and could be moved up and down using the speed control motor. The distance between the conductor and the basement was already specified. When the tree was moved upward, the distance between the basement and the moving platform on which the tree was placed increased, while the distance between the tree and the conductor decreased. At some specific distance between the tree and the conductor, the electric field around the conductor caused ionization in the air and generated an arc that caused short-circuiting. The distance between the tree and the conductor just before the arc was produced is the MVCD. The MVCD depends upon the voltage level: the greater the voltage level, the greater the MVCD, and vice versa. This distance could be measured easily with the help of a scale attached to the sliding mechanism. Before starting the experiment, at some specific voltage, the distance between the tree and the conductor was measured. When the conductor was energized and the platform moved upward by some distance, an arc was produced between the tree and the conductor. At this point (just before the arc was produced), the vegetation clearance distance could be measured by subtracting the distance traveled by the tree from the initial distance between the tree and conductor before the experiment was begun. At each voltage level, this MVCD had a different value.
Figure 3 shows an arc produced between the conductor and the tree just after crossing the MVCD.
5. Experimental Results for MVCD
5.1. Experimental MVCD Values
The MVCD was measured using the procedure discussed above. Different MVCD values at different voltages are shown in
Table 3. The graph of these MVCD values is shown in
Figure 4.
5.2. Comparison of Experimental MVCD, Experimental (Compensated) MVCD and MVCD from the Gallet Equation (for DC Voltage)
The Gallet equation results showed a significant deviation from the experimental results, as shown in
Figure 5. However, when the experimental values of the MVCD were used with a correction factor of 1.8 (i.e., maximum switching or transient overvoltage factor [
17,
21]) to derive a compensated MVCD, the MVCD values became closer to the Gallet equation results (
Figure 6). This shows the verification of the experiment.
5.3. Extended MVCD Results
Figure 7 shows the compensated experimental results up to 900 kV. As discussed above, the experimental MVCD values were determined up to 60 kV. These results were compensated and extended up to 900 kV. In this way, an equation satisfying these MVCD values at the voltage level from 100 kV to the voltage level of 900 kV is obtained. The equation is an exponential approximation as it showed the best curve fit:
In this equation, y represents the MVCD (m) and x represents DC voltage. Using this equation, the MVCD value at each level of voltage can be calculated.
5.4. Comparison between the MVCD Results from the Gallet Equation for DC Voltage and Experimental (Compensated-Extended) Results
Table 4 shows the experimental (compensated-extended) MVCD and the MVCD from the Gallet equation at DC voltages. These table data for the compensated and extended experimental MVCD values are obtained from Equation (12). It can be seen from the table that the MVCD values are similar at each voltage level. This demonstrates verification of the MVCD values obtained from the Gallet equation for DC voltage with the help of the experiment.
The purpose of this work was to find the MVCD value at DC 500 kV. The table shows that the MVCD value of 1.16 m at 500 kV obtained from the experiment (compensated-extended) is very close to the MVCD value of 1.13 m obtained from the Gallet equation for DC voltage.
6. Discussion and Conclusions
It is important to establish a minimum vegetation clearance distance (MVCD) in the case of HVDC transmission to avoid flashover between trees and transmission lines. Each country has its own parameters to determine this clearance distance. The Gallet equation is one of the most famous methods for the determination of MVCD, especially in the case of HVAC transmission. No significant work has previously been undertaken for the measurement of MVDC for HVDC transmission.
In the present work, an effort has been made to determine the MVCD in the case of HVDC transmission. This work dealt first with the determination of the MVCD by the Gallet equation in the case of HVAC transmission and the different factors that affect the MVCD. Using a conversion formula, any DC voltage value can be converted into an equivalent AC voltage value. The MVCD from the Gallet equation has been determined for both low and high DC voltages.
Experimental verification was also needed. An experiment was performed at DC voltages up to 60 kV. Thereafter, compensated results were obtained by using a correction factor. These results were extended up to 900 kV. An equation was obtained that was used to achieve the MVCD values at different DC voltage levels beyond those employed in the experiment.
Finally, a comparison between the results from the Gallet equation (for DC voltage) and the experimental (compensated-extended) results has been carried out. The MVCD results obtained from the Gallet equation for DC voltage have been verified by the experimental (compensated-extended) work, because the two sets of results have been shown to be very close to each other. At 500 kV, both the MVCD values were almost equal. For future work, the authors are planning modeling and simulations of this experiment.
Author Contributions
K.H.K., C.-H.K. and S.-B.R. contributed to the literature review of the minimum vegetation clearance distance and then together with S.-B.R., we did discussions about the different parameters settings during the experiment, conducted the experiment and analyzed the results. The authors, C.P., J.-H.L., C.-G.P. and S.H.L. contributed during the revision and helped us to make some technical points clear.
Acknowledgments
Authors would like to thank Yeungnam University for all the supports in term of scholarship to Kumail Hassan Kharal.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Moran, R. Executioner’s Current Thomas Edison, George Westinghouse, and the Invention of the Electric Chair, Chapter: The Battle of the Currents; Vintage Books: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Setreus, J.; Bertling, L. Introduction to HVDC technology for reliable electrical power systems. In Proceedings of the Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems 2008 PMAPS the 10th International Conference, Rincon, Puerto Rico, 25–29 May 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Redfern, M.A. The advantages and disadvantages of using HVDC to interconnect AC networks. In Proceedings of the Universities Power Engineering 45th International Conference (UPEC), Cardiff, Wales, UK, 31 August–3 September 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Barnes, M.; Van Hertem, D.; Teeuwsen, S.P.; Callavik, M. HVDC systems in smart grids. Proc. IEEE. 2017, 105, 2082–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pourbeik, P.; Bahrman, M.; John, E.; Wong, W. Modern countermeasurus to blackouts. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 2006, 4, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padiyar, K.R. HVDC Power Transmission Systems: Technology and System Interactions; New Age International: New Delhi, India, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Arrillaga, J.; Liu, Y.H.; Watson, N.R. Flexible Power Transmission: The HVDC Options; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Paulinder, J. Operation and Control of HVDC Links Embedded in AC Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Chalmers Tekniska Högsk, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Bahrman, M.P.; Johnson, B.K. The ABCs of HVDC transmission technologies. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 2007, 5, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamakshaiah, S.; Kamaraju, V. HVDC Transmission; TATA McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Hong, A.; Dielectric Strength of Air. The Physics Factbook. 2000. Available online: https://hypertextbook.com/facts/2000/AliceHong.shtml (accessed on 29 September 2018).
- Yu, Z.; Huang, K.; Zeng, R.; Gao, Z.; Li, M.; Liu, L.; Lou, B.; Ma, Q.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, B.; et al. Research on DC Electric Field Measurement Considering Ion Flow Near HVDC Transmission Line. In Proceedings of the 12th IET International Conference on AC and DC Power Transmission (ACDC 2016), Beijing, China, 28–29 May 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Panicker, P.K. Ionization of Air by Corona Discharge—Aerodynamics Research Center. Master’s Thesis, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Motomura, T.; Hirao, M.; Nakamura, K.; Kikuchi, T. Development of the heliborne separation measuring system and its practical application. In Proceedings of the Transmission & Distribution Construction, Operation & Live-Line Maintenance ESMO’98 IEEE 8th International Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 26–30 April 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Kirkham, H. Applicability of the “Gallet Equation” to the Vegetation Clearances of NERC Reliability Standard FAC-003-2; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory: Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Hileman, A.R. Insulation Coordination for Power Systems; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- The North American Electric Reliability Corporation Vegetation Management Standard Drafting Team. Transmission Vegetation Management Standard FAC-003-2 Technical Reference; North American Electric Reality Corporation: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Gallet, G.; Leroy, G.; Lacey, R.; Kromer, I. General expression for positive switching impulse strength valid up to extra long air gaps. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. 1975, 94, 1989–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAC-003-3 Minimum Vegetation Clearance Distances; North American Electric Reliability Corporation: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2015.
- Hill, H.L.; Capon, A.S.; Ratz, O.; Renner, P.E.; Schmidt, W.D. Transmission line Reference Book HVDC to ±600 kV; OSTI: Anderson, TN, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- 516-2003 IEEE Guide for Maintenance Methods on Energized Power Lines; IEEE Std: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2009.
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).