Next Article in Journal
Influences of Fracturing Fluid Injection on Mechanical Integrity of Cement Sheath under Four Failure Modes
Previous Article in Journal
Key Development Factors of Hydrothermal Processes in Germany by 2030: A Fuzzy Logic Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

AC Breakdown Characteristics of c-C4F8/N2 Gas Mixtures in an Extremely Non-Uniform Electric Field

1
Key Laboratory of Engineering Dielectrics and Its Application of Ministry of Education & College of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China
2
State Grid Zhejiang Xinchang Power Supply Co. LTD, Shaoxing 312000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2018, 11(12), 3533; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123533
Submission received: 5 November 2018 / Revised: 10 December 2018 / Accepted: 13 December 2018 / Published: 19 December 2018

Abstract

:
Octafluorocyclobutane (c-C4F8) is one of the environmentally friendly gases with the potential to replace SF6. In this paper, the AC breakdown characteristics of c-C4F8/N2 mixture in an extremely non-uniform electric field were studied; the effects of the gas pressure, electrode distance, and c-C4F8 volume fraction on the breakdown voltage were analyzed; and the feasibility of replacing SF6 with c-C4F8/N2 was verified. The results show that the breakdown voltage of c-C4F8 /N2 increases with an increase in pressure, electrode spacing, and volume fraction of c-C4F8 in an extremely non-uniform electric field. Under the same conditions, the breakdown voltage of 20%c-C4F8/80%N2 is 46–90% that of 20%SF6/80%N2. When the pressure is 0.3 MPa, the 20%c-C4F8/80%N2 breakdown voltage can reach over 57% that of SF6. Taking into consideration the environment, liquefaction temperature, and insulation strength, 20%c-C4F8/80%N2 may replace SF6 used for medium- and low-voltage equipment.

1. Introduction

Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) is widely used in power systems and electrical equipment owing to its high insulation level and arc-extinguishing capacity [1,2]. However, the non-homogeneity of an electric field, the conducting particles, and the surface roughness of the electrode all have a significant influence on the dielectric strength of SF6 during use [3,4,5]. Above all, SF6 is a potent greenhouse gas whose global warming potential (GWP) is 23,900 times that of CO2, and whose life expectancy is 3200 years in the atmosphere, which causes a severe greenhouse effect [6,7]. Therefore, in the Kyoto protocol adopted by Japan on December 1997, SF6 was listed as one of six gases requiring global regulation [8]. Considering the environment, it has become an inevitable tendency to find a new environment-friendly gas to replace SF6.
Thus, many gases with high insulating strength have been concentrated on by researchers to replace SF6, such as octurobutane (c-C4F8), trifluoroiodomethane(CF3I), heptafluorobutyronitrile (C4F7N) and trifluorovinyl ether (C5F10O). However, the boiling points of C4F7N and C5F10O are high, which restrict the use for low temperature environments. Although CF3I has low toxicity, the decomposition product of CF3I contains iodine, and the effect of iodine on breakdown is not clear [9], while c-C4F8 is an electronegative gas with stable chemical properties, and displays non-toxicity, non-combustibility, and non-ozone effects [10]. The breakdown voltage of c-C4F8 is 1.3 times of SF6 under a uniform electric field, while the GWP of c-C4F8 is 8700, which is about 1/3 of SF6, so the impact on the environment is much smaller than that of SF6 [11,12]. c-C4F8 mixed gas was listed as an insulating gas for future long-term research at the 1997 technical conference of the National Association of Standards and Technology [13]. Owing to the high liquefaction temperature of c-C4F8 gas, it cannot be directly used in electrical equipment, and buffer gases such as N2 or CO2 are often added in use. So far, researchers have conducted many studies on the electrical properties of c-C4F8 mixtures [6,14]. Xiao et al. investigated the AC breakdown characteristics of c-C4F8/N2 and c-C4F8/CO2 under a slightly non-uniform electric field, analyzed the breakdown products, and obtained the synergetic coefficients of mixed gases under different volume fractions. Results indicate that c-C4F8/N2 and c-C4F8/CO2 can be used as an alternative gas to SF6 under certain conditions [15,16]. Xing et al. studied the partial discharge characteristics of a c-C4F8/N2 mixed gas, and demonstrated the feasibility of substituting c-C4F8/N2 for SF6 in terms of the liquid temperature, environmental influence, and partial discharge characteristics [17]. Li et al. analyzed the decomposition products of a c-C4F8/N2 mixed gas under typical faults such as local overheating, a partial discharge, spark, and arc discharges, and confirmed that the breakdown products of a c-C4F8/N2 mixture under several common faults are less toxic, thus c-C4F8/N2 can be used as an alternative to SF6 [18].
Thus far, researchers have studied the insulation properties of a c-C4F8/N2 mixture under a uniform and slightly non-uniform electric field. However, in practical application, owing to the limitation of processing technology, burrs or suspended impurity particles are present in gas-insulated high-voltage equipment, which will lead to a distortion of their local electric field. Therefore, it is also particularly important to investigate the breakdown characteristics of the gas insulated under an extremely non-uniform electric field. In this paper, a discharge device was established and an AC test platform was set up. Based on the use conditions, the volume fraction of c-C4F8 in the test was determined, and the breakdown voltages of c-C4F8/N2 under different pressures, electrode distances, and volume fractions of c-C4F8 were tested. The trend of breakdown voltage changes with pressure, electrode distance and the volume fraction of c-C4F8 was then analyzed. The feasibility of replacing SF6 with c-C4F8/N2 is discussed.

2. Experimental Setup

2.1. Experimental Circuit

The experimental circuit adopted in this paper is shown in Figure 1. The adjustable range of the voltage regulator was 0–220V and the transformer was a YWDT-15kVA/150kV model (Yingkou Jingcheng Special Transformer Co. Ltd., Yingkou, China). Resistance in the circuit was 10 kΩ, used to reduce the output current and protect the transformer. The current of the relay in the voltage regulator was set at 2.1 A. The circuit was arranged so that when the gas broke down, the current reached a set value, the relay opened, and the breakdown voltage measured. The values of capacitor C1 and C2 were, respectively, 309 pF and 0.307 μF [19,20]. Before the test, the discharge device was vacuumed, and then filled with mixed gas. During the test, the voltage was manually increased until breakdown of the mixed gas. When the voltage is much less than the breakdown voltage, the boost speed of the voltage is high; conversely, the boost speed slows when the voltage is close to the breakdown voltage. After five duplicate tests, the average value was taken as the breakdown voltage. The interval between the tests was 5 min.
The discharge device is shown in Figure 2. As the pressure of the insulating gas used is generally 0.3–0.5 MPa [7,21], the discharge device must safely withstand a pressure of at least 0.5 MPa. The cavity of the discharge device was enclosed by a stainless steel 304 seamless steel tube with a diameter of 300 mm, height of 470 mm, and thickness of 10 mm. The upper and lower closure plates were made of stainless steel 304 with a thickness of 20 mm. In addition, two observation windows with a diameter of 50 mm were placed on both sides of the cavity to observe the experimental phenomena. The observation windows were made of a stainless steel flange and tempered glass. A high-voltage electrode was introduced through high-voltage bushing.

2.2. Electrode and Electric Field Simulation

In this study, a needle-plate electrode was used to generate an extremely non-uniform electric field. The electrode distance ranged from 0 to 20 mm. The diameter of the plate electrode was 140 mm, the thickness was 25 mm, and the chamfer radius was 8 mm. The diameter of the needle electrode was 5 mm, the length was 50 mm, the length of the tip was 5 mm, and the tip curvature radius was about 0.15 mm; in addition, both needle-plate electrodes were made of brass. Because the discharge will lead to material loss at the tip and increase the curvature radius of the electrode, the needle electrode should be regularly replaced.
During the test, the electrode distances were 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm. Here we calculate the non-uniformity coefficients f under different electrode distances with the following expression [20,22]:
f = E max E av
E av = U d
where Emax is the maximum electric field strength (V/m), Eav is the average electric field strength (V/m), U is voltage applied to the electrode (V), and d is the electrode distance (m).
We used COMSOL software to simulate the electric field distribution, and obtained the Emax between the needle-plates with different electrode distances. The simulation result when the electrode distance was 20 mm is shown in Figure 3.
Based on the simulation results, the non-uniformity coefficients calculated under different electrode distances are shown in Table 1.
It can be seen from the calculation results that the non-uniformity coefficients of the electric field calculated at different electrode distances are all greater than 4 [22], and thus the distribution of the electric field between the inter-electrode conforms to the requirement of an extremely non-uniform electric field.

2.3. Volume Fraction of Mixture

c-C4F8 and N2 used were manufactured by Huate Gas Co., Ltd (Foshan, China), and the prices were USD 75.00 and USD 0.70 per kilogram, respectively. The purity of c-C4F8 and N2 in the experiment was above 99.9%. The liquefaction temperature of N2 is −195.8 °C, which is far lower than c-C4F8 (−8 °C). In the test, the mixture was set at 0.5 MPa and −10 °C without liquefaction. Actually, the liquefaction temperature of the mixture should be lower than the operating temperature. The maximum volume fraction of c-C4F8 in the mixture can be calculated through the following formula [23]:
T mb = T b 1 - ln ( 10 k P ) / 10.5
where Tmb is the liquefaction temperature of a mixed gas (K), Tb is the liquefaction temperature value of c-C4F8 (K), P is the gas pressure (MPa), and k is the volume fraction of c-C4F8 when the gas pressure is P.
It can be determined through Equation (3) that the volume fraction of c-C4F8 in a mixed gas is not more than 20%. In the test, the pressure ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 MPa; the testing step length was 0.05 MPa; the volume fractions of c-C4F8 were 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%; the accuracy of mixed gases was ±1%; and the experiment was conducted at 20 °C.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Breakdown Voltages of c-C4F8/N2 Mixture Changes with Pressure

The AC breakdown characteristics of c-C4F8/N2 in an extremely non-uniform electric field were obtained from the test, and the breakdown voltages of the gas mixture changed with the gas pressure are shown in Figure 4.
It can be seen from Figure 4 that the pressure has a significant impact on the breakdown voltage. On the whole, the AC breakdown voltages of c-C4F8/N2 mixture increase with the increase in pressure. When the gaps between the electrodes are 5, 10, or 15 mm, the AC breakdown voltage shows the same increase trend as the change in pressure. When the electrode distance is 5 or 10 mm, the breakdown voltage of the gas at a pressure of 0.5 MPa increases approximately two-fold to 0.1 MPa, whereas when the electrode distance is 15 mm, the breakdown voltages increases by about 1.5-fold. The reason why the breakdown voltages increase with pressure is because, as the pressure increases, the number of molecules per volume increases, which shortens the free path of the electrons. The amount of energy accumulated by the electrons decreases in the free path, thus affecting the development of an electron avalanche. At the same time, c-C4F8 is an electronegative gas, with a relatively large cross-section in the low energy region, and can attract low-energy electrons, thereby generating negative ions and further increasing the breakdown voltage. When the electrode distance is 20 mm, the breakdown voltages showed different trends with the pressure. Under a pressure of 0.15 MPa, the breakdown voltage increases rapidly, and breakdown voltages between 0.15 and 0.40 MPa increase slowly. When the pressure exceeds 0.4 MPa, the breakdown voltages increases sharply, that is, a “hump” appears. This phenomenon exists in the breakdown of mixed gases such as SF6, C3F8, and CF3I [24]. The main reason for this is that a stable corona can be formed at the tip of the needle in an extremely non-uniform electric field, and the electric field distribution around the needle electrode can be improved to further increase the breakdown voltages; thus, the breakdown voltage is higher when the pressure is 0.15 MPa. However, as the pressure increases further, the diffusion motion of the space charge decreases, the size of the corona decreases, the effect on the improvement of the electric field diminishes, and the breakdown voltage increases slowly.

3.2. Breakdown Voltages of c-C4F8/N2 Mixture Varying with Electrode Distance

The breakdown voltage of c-C4F8/N2 gas varied with the electrode distance, as shown in Figure 5.
As shown in Figure 5, c-C4F8/N2 shows the same growth trend with the change in electrode distance under a different volume fraction. When the electrode distance is 10 mm, no significant improvement is shown when compared with the breakdown voltage of 5 mm. When the electrode distance is larger than 10 mm, the breakdown voltage significantly increases in a linear fashion.

3.3. Breakdown Voltages of c-C4F8/N2 Mixture Varying with Volume Fraction

When the electrode distance is 5 or 15 mm, the breakdown voltages of the c-C4F8/N2 mixture change with the volume fraction k of c-C4F8, as shown in Figure 6.
According to Figure 6, as the volume fraction of c-C4F8 increases, the dielectric strength of c-C4F8/N2 increases. When the electrode distance is 5 mm, c-C4F8/N2 increases nearly linearly with the increase in the volume fraction of c-C4F8. When the electrode distance is 15 mm, the pressure is 0.45 and 0.50 MPa; in addition, the volume fraction k increases from 5% to 10%, and the breakdown voltage significantly improves. The reason that breakdown voltage increases is that, with the increase in volume fraction, the probability of c-C4F8 attracting electrons increases, and the electron avalanche development slows, resulting in an increase in the breakdown voltage. It can be seen from this trend that if the volume fraction of c-C4F8 is less than 20%, the breakdown voltage of c-C4F8/N2 can be increased through an increase in the volume fraction of c-C4F8.

3.4. Feasibility of Replacing SF6/N2 with c-C4F8/N2

To verify the insulation level of c-C4F8/N2 under an extremely non-uniform electric field, the breakdown voltages of c-C4F8/N2 were compared with those of SF6 and 20%SF6/80%N2 under the same experimental conditions. The breakdown voltages of SF6 and 20%SF6/80%N2 were taken from [23], and the comparison results are shown in Figure 7.
It can be seen from Figure 7 that when the electrode distance is 10 or 20 mm, on the whole the breakdown voltages of 20%c-C4F8/80%N2 are lower than those of SF6 and 20%SF6/80%N2. When the electrode distance is 10 mm, the breakdown voltage of 20%c-C4F8/80%N2 is 46–64% that of 20%SF6/80%N2. At 0.3 MPa, the breakdown voltage of 20%c-C4F8/80%N2 is 57% that of SF6. When the electrode distance is 20 mm, the breakdown voltage of 20%c-C4F8/80%N2 is 60–90% that of 20%SF6/80%N2. At 0.3 MPa, the 20%c-C4F8/80%N2 breakdown voltage is 66.1 kV, or 91% of the breakdown voltage of SF6 (72.4 kV). In some cases (Figure 7a, 0.20MPa and Figure 7b, 0.15MPa) the performance of SF6 is approximately two–three times better than the c-C4F8 mixture. By comparing the breakdown voltages, it can be seen that 20%c-C4F8/80%N2 has the potential to replace SF6 in an extremely non-uniform electric field.
As an alternative to SF6, many other aspects of c-C4F8 electrical properties are relevant, including the breakdown characteristics under a slightly non-uniform electric field, partial discharge characteristics, and toxicity of decomposition products. In [15], results showed that the AC breakdown voltage of c-C4F8 is 1.4 times that of SF6 under a slightly non-uniform electric field. Results from the literature [17] also indicated that the partial discharge performance of 20%C4F8/80%N2 is similar to that of 20%SF6/80%N2. The authors of [18] found that the product components of c-C4F8 are mainly fluorocarbon gas, such as CF4, C2F6 C2F4 C3F8 and C3F6. From the above electrical properties, c-C4F8 has potential to replace SF6 used in low- and medium-voltage equipment.

4. Conclusions

  • In an extremely non-uniform electric field, the breakdown voltages of 20%c-C4F8/80%N2 increase with the increase in pressure, electrode distance, and the volume fraction of c-C4F8. As the pressure increases, a “hump” occurs owing to the homogenization of an electric field through the corona. With the increase in electrode distance, the AC breakdown voltages of c-C4F8/N2 increase slightly in the case of a short gap, and increase significantly in the case of a long gap.
  • Based on a comparison between SF6 and 20%SF6/80%N2, it was found that under the same conditions, the breakdown voltage of 20%c-C4F8/80%N2 can reach up to 46–90% that of 20%SF6/80%N2. At 0.3 MPa, the breakdown voltage of 20%c-C4F8/80%N2 can reach over 57% that of SF6.
  • In an extremely non-uniform electric field, considering the insulation level and liquefaction temperature, a 20%c-C4F8/80%N2 mixture has the potential to replace SF6 in low- and medium-voltage equipment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.W. and L.L.; methodology, Q.C. and L.L.; experiment, H.F. and C.Z.; software, L.L.; formal analysis, L.L.; investigation, L.L.; resources, Q.C.; data curation, L.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L.; writing—review and editing, L.L.; supervision, H.Z.; project administration, Q.C.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Luo, X.C. SF6 Gas-Insulated Switchgear; China Electric Power Press: Beijing, China, 1999; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  2. Christophorou, L.G.; Olthoff, J.K.; Van Brunt, R.J. Sulfur hexafluoride and the electric power industry. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 1997, 13, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, X.W.; Zhao, H. Review of research progress in SF6 substitute gases. High Volt. Eng. 2016, 42, 1695–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liang, F.J.; Wang, Y.Z.; Wang, L. The application situation of SF6 in electrical equipment and some problem. Insul. Mater. 2010, 43, 43–46. [Google Scholar]
  5. Qiu, Y.; Chalmers, I.D. Effect of surface roughness on breakdown in SF6-N2 and SF6-CO2 gas mixtures. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1993, 26, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, R.; Wang, J.; Li, J. Insulation Characteristics of Environmentally Friendly Mix Gas c-C4F8/N2 Substituting SF6. High Volt. Eng. 2017, 43, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xiao, D.M. Gas Insulation and GIS; Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press: Shanghai, China, 2016; pp. 76–78. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tu, R.H. Introduction to United Nations framework convention on climate change and its Kyoto protocol and their negotiation process. Environ. Prot. 2005, 33, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xiao, D.M. Development Prospect of Gas Insulation based on Environmental Protection; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  10. Blodgett, F.W. Properties of octafluorocyclobutane, a dielectric gas. Trans. Am. Inst. Electr. Eng. Part I Commun. Electron. 1959, 78, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xiao, D.M. Development prospect of gas insulation based on environmental protection. High Volt. Eng. 2016, 42, 1035–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhao, X.L.; Jiao, J.T.; Li, B.; Xiao, D. The electronegativity analysis of c-C4F8 as a potential insulation substitute of SF6. Plasma Sci. Technol. 2016, 18, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Christophorou, L.G.; Ohhoff, J.K.; Green, D.S. Gases for Electrical Insulation and Arc Interruption: Possible Present and Future Alternatives to Pure SF6; No. Technical Note (NIST TN)-1425; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1997.
  14. Zhang, L.C. Study on Insulation Characteristics of c-C4F8 and Its Gas Mixtures Substituting SF6; Shanghai Jiao Tong University: Shanghai, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  15. Man, L.K.; Deng, Y.K.; Xiao, D.M. Insulating Properties of c-C4F8/N2 and c-C4F8/CO2 Mixtures. Gaodianya Jishu. 2017, 43, 788–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, L.C.; Xiao, D.M.; Zhang, D. SST Experimental Analysis on the Feasibility of c-C4F8/CF4 Substituting SF6 as Insulation Medium. Trans. China Electrotech. Soc. 2008, 23, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xing, W.J.; Zhang, G.Q.; Li, K.; Niu, W.H.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.Y. Experimental Study of Partial Discharge Characteristics of C4F8/N2 Mixtures. Proc. Chin. Soc. Electr. Eng. 2011, 31, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, K.; Zhang, G.Q.; Xing, W.J.; Han, D.; Niu, W.H. Experiment Analysis of Decomposition Products in Products in Typical Fault of c-C4F8 Gas and Insulating Gas Mixture Containing c-C4F8 and N2. High Volt. Eng. 2012, 38, 985–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jiao, J.T.; Xiao, D.M.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, H. Insulation Characteristics for CF3I-CO2 Gas Mixtures with Low Proportion of CF3I in Extreme Non-uniform Electric Field. High Volt. Eng. 2017, 43, 772–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xiao, S.; Zhang, X.X.; Dai, Q.W.; Han, Y.F. Experimental Research of CF3I/N2 Gas Mixtures on Power Frequency Breakdown Performances Under Different Electric Field. Proc. Chin. Soc. Electr. Eng. 2016, 36, 6276–6285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gao, K.L.; Yan, X.L.; Wang, H.; He, J.; Li, Z.B.; Bai, C.Y.; Liu, Y.; Huang, H. Progress in Environment-friendly Gas-insulated Transmission Line (GIL). High Volt. Eng. 2018, 44, 3105–3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yan, Z. High Voltage and Insulation Technology; Electric Power Press of China: Beijing, China, 2002; pp. 8–9. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yamamoto, O.; Takuma, T.; Hamada, S.; Yamakawa, Y.; Yashima, M. Applying a Gas Mixture Containing c-C4F8 as an Insulation Medium. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2001, 8, 1075–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Deng, Y.K.; Ma, Y.; Chen, X.F.; Zhang, S.Q.; Chen, X.Y.; Xiao, D.M. AC Breakdown Characteristics of CF3I-N2 Gas Mixtures in Condition of Quasi-homogeneous and Extremely Non-uniform Electric Field. High Volt. Eng. 2017, 43, 754–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experiment circuit.
Figure 1. Experiment circuit.
Energies 11 03533 g001
Figure 2. Photograph of discharge device.
Figure 2. Photograph of discharge device.
Energies 11 03533 g002
Figure 3. Electric field simulation of needle-plate electrode at 20 mm.
Figure 3. Electric field simulation of needle-plate electrode at 20 mm.
Energies 11 03533 g003
Figure 4. The breakdown voltages of the mixture varying with pressure: electrode distance d of (a) 5, (b) 10, (c) 15, and (d) 20 mm.
Figure 4. The breakdown voltages of the mixture varying with pressure: electrode distance d of (a) 5, (b) 10, (c) 15, and (d) 20 mm.
Energies 11 03533 g004
Figure 5. The breakdown voltage of c-C4F8/N2 gas varying with the electrode distance for k of (a) 5%, (b) 10%, (c) 15%, and (d) 20%.
Figure 5. The breakdown voltage of c-C4F8/N2 gas varying with the electrode distance for k of (a) 5%, (b) 10%, (c) 15%, and (d) 20%.
Energies 11 03533 g005
Figure 6. The breakdown voltage of c-C4F8/N2 gas varying with the volume fraction for d of (a) 5 and (b) 15 mm.
Figure 6. The breakdown voltage of c-C4F8/N2 gas varying with the volume fraction for d of (a) 5 and (b) 15 mm.
Energies 11 03533 g006
Figure 7. Comparisons of the breakdown voltages of SF6, c-C4F8/N2, and 20%SF6/80%N2 in an extremely non-uniform electric field for d of (a) 10 and (b) 20 mm.
Figure 7. Comparisons of the breakdown voltages of SF6, c-C4F8/N2, and 20%SF6/80%N2 in an extremely non-uniform electric field for d of (a) 10 and (b) 20 mm.
Energies 11 03533 g007
Table 1. Non-uniformity coefficients under different electrode distances.
Table 1. Non-uniformity coefficients under different electrode distances.
Electrode gap /mm5101520
Non-uniformity coefficients4.25.756.97.9

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, L.; Chen, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Feng, H.; Zhang, C. AC Breakdown Characteristics of c-C4F8/N2 Gas Mixtures in an Extremely Non-Uniform Electric Field. Energies 2018, 11, 3533. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123533

AMA Style

Lin L, Chen Q, Wang X, Zhang H, Feng H, Zhang C. AC Breakdown Characteristics of c-C4F8/N2 Gas Mixtures in an Extremely Non-Uniform Electric Field. Energies. 2018; 11(12):3533. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123533

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Lin, Qingguo Chen, Xinyu Wang, Hui Zhang, Haoran Feng, and Cong Zhang. 2018. "AC Breakdown Characteristics of c-C4F8/N2 Gas Mixtures in an Extremely Non-Uniform Electric Field" Energies 11, no. 12: 3533. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123533

APA Style

Lin, L., Chen, Q., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Feng, H., & Zhang, C. (2018). AC Breakdown Characteristics of c-C4F8/N2 Gas Mixtures in an Extremely Non-Uniform Electric Field. Energies, 11(12), 3533. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123533

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop