Next Article in Journal
Optimal Re-Dispatching of Cascaded Hydropower Plants Using Quadratic Programming and Chance-Constrained Programming
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of the Energy Consumption of a Carbon Capture and Sequestration Related Carbon Dioxide Compression Processes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Energies
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/en12091605
energies-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 on the AC Breakdown Voltage of Palm Oil and Coconut Oil in the Presence of CTAB

by
Nur Aqilah Mohamad
1,*,
Norhafiz Azis
1,2,*,
Jasronita Jasni
1,
Mohd Zainal Abidin Ab Kadir
1,3,
Robiah Yunus
4 and
Zaini Yaakub
5
1
Advanced Lightning, Power and Energy Research Centre (ALPER), Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
2
Institute of Advanced Technology (ITMA), Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
3
Institute of Power Engineering (IPE), Universiti Tenaga Nasional, 43000 Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia
4
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
5
Hyrax Oil Sdn. Bhd., Lot 4937 Batu 51/2, Jalan Meru, Mukim Kapar, 41050 Klang, Selangor, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2019, 12(9), 1605; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091605
Submission received: 8 March 2019 / Revised: 9 April 2019 / Accepted: 9 April 2019 / Published: 27 April 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This paper presents an experimental study on the AC breakdown voltages of Refined, Bleached and Deodorized Palm Oil (RBDPO) Olein and Coconut Oil (CO) in the presence of conductive (Iron (II,III) Oxide, Fe3O4), semi-conductive (Copper (II) Oxide, CuO) and insulative (Aluminium Oxide, Al2O3) nanoparticles without and with surfactant. The type of surfactant used in this study was Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB). The volume concentrations range of Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 was varied from 0.001% to 0.05%. Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) was used to characterize the nanoparticles in RBDPO and CO. AC breakdown voltage tests were carried out for RBDPO and CO of which the AC breakdown voltage at 1% probability was determined based on Weibull distribution. It is found that only Al2O3 can improve the average AC breakdown voltage of RBDPO and CO. The AC breakdown voltages at 1% probability for RBDPO and CO can be improved through introduction of Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 at certain volume concentrations. Al2O3 provides the highest enhancement of AC breakdown voltages at 1% probability for RBDPO and CO with the highest percentage of improvement can be up to 52%. CTAB has no clear effect on the improvement of AC breakdown voltages of RBDPO and CO based Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 nanofluids.

1. Introduction

It is known that nanoparticles are able to enhance the cooling properties, thermal conductivity/diffusivity and electrical characteristics of insulation fluids [1,2,3,4]. Previous works have examined thoroughly the electrical parameters of nanofluids which include the initiation voltage, discharge propagation and streamers [5,6]. The effects of nanoparticles on insulation fluids are known to be dependent upon the intrinsic properties, volume concentrations, solid-liquid contact areas, suspension by surfactants and synthesis methods [7,8].
The synthesis method of dispersing nanoparticles in insulation fluids can be carried out either by one- or two-step methods. In one-step method, the dispersion of nanoparticles is carried out directly into the base fluids. However, this method is not recommended for large quantities of nanofluids due to the incomplete reaction and stabilization [9,10]. In two-step method, nanoparticles are dispersed into the base fluids by automated mixers such as magnetic stirrer, high-shear mixers and bead mills. Sonication is used to ensure uniform dispersion of nanofluids and surfactant decrease agglomeration and prevent sedimentation of nanofluids. In addition, the electrostatic and steric stabilities of insulation fluids against agglomeration can be improved with introduction of surfactants. Surfactants could adsorb at the interface between nanoparticle and insulating fluid and change the dielectric and thermal characteristics of nanofluids [8,11].
Previous works have examined the mineral oil and vegetable oil based nanofluids based on electrically conductive, semi-conductive and insulative nanoparticles which focus on the AC/lightning breakdown voltage, streamer, partial discharge, dielectric properties and thermal ageing [3,4,5,6,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Majority of the studies focus on the AC breakdown voltages examination whereby different types of nanoparticles such as Iron (II,III) Oxide (Fe3O4), Iron (III) Oxide (Fe2O3), Zinc Oxide (ZnO), Silicon Oxide (SiO2), Titanium Oxide (TiO2), Aluminium Oxide (Al2O3), Copper (II) Oxide (CuO), Zirconium Dioxide (ZrO2), Multi-wall Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNT) and Aluminium Nitride (AIN) have been considered [4,5,11,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Both mineral- and vegetable-based nanofluids have been tested for AC breakdown voltage and the performance improvements up to 256% and 63% have been recorded [35,37]. In addition, different types of surfactants such as Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB), oleic acid, Sodium Dodecyl Sulfonate (SDS), silane coupling agent Z6011, Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulfonate (SDBS) and Octadecylamine Acetate (ODA) have been examined of which several noticeable impacts are observed [5,11,22,25,26,27,30,33,36,38]. Overall, the AC breakdown voltage studies of nanofluids conclude that the positive effects will normally take place at low level of volume percentage concentrations of nanoparticles [11,22,27,30]. In addition, the types of surfactants used for the nanofluids can also affect the AC breakdown voltage performances [27,38].
Most of the AC breakdown voltage studies on vegetable-based nanofluids focused on crops such as rapeseed, palm, soybean, corn and coconut [5,20,22,24,25,26,29,33,35]. A study in Reference [5] reveals that the average AC breakdown voltage of rapeseed oil increases by 20% with the introduction of Fe3O4 and oleic acid [5]. Other study shows that the introduction of Fe3O4 could reduce the AC breakdown voltage at 1% probability for Palm Fatty Acid Ester (PFAE) by 5%. However, both TiO2 and Al2O3 could increase the AC breakdown voltage at 1% probability for PFAE by 14% and 7% respectively [20]. In the presence of ZnO and TiO2, the AC breakdown voltages of soybean ester oil can increases by 41% and 63% while palm ester oil can increase by 44% and 54% respectively [25]. Other studies in References [24,29] show that the introduction of TiO2 and SiO2 in natural ester FR3, increase the AC breakdown voltage by 31% and 33%. Currently, the studies on the effect of nanoparticles on Refined, Bleached and Deodorized Palm Oil (RBDPO) Olein and Coconut Oil (CO) are still limited. In addition, further knowledge is needed to confirm the impact of Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 on the AC breakdown voltage performances on vegetable oils. This paper presents the initiative to further understand the impact of three types of nanoparticles on the AC breakdown voltage performances of RBDPO and CO. Conductive (Fe3O4), semi-conductive (CuO) and insulative (Al2O3) nanoparticles are used in this study. The impact of CTAB is also examined and all samples are tested for AC breakdown voltages. Weibull distribution is used for the analysis on the AC breakdown voltage at 1% probability.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Two types of RBDPO Olein were examined as samples for palm oil. Meanwhile, virgin CO was used for the other type of vegetable oil. The fats content and vitamin E and A of the RBDPO and CO are shown in Table 1. The distribution of the fatty acids for all RBDPO and CO were determined by Gas Chromatography (GC) based on MPOB test methods, p.3.4:2004 and p.3.5:2004 [39]. The contents of saturated fats and unsaturated fats among the RBDPO are almost similar and it is lower than CO which is dominated by saturated fats, as shown in Table 1.
The types of nanoparticles used in this study were conductive nanoparticle, Fe3O4, semi-conductive nanoparticle, CuO and insulative nanoparticle, Al2O3. The basic properties of Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 nanoparticles are shown in Table 2. The Al2O3 size is lower than both Fe3O4 and CuO. The colour of Fe3O4 and CuO are black while Al2O3 is white. The densities of Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 are 5.17 g/cm3, 6.31 g/cm3 and 3.96 g/cm3 respectively.
To attain suspension stability against sedimentation of nanoparticles, CTAB was used in this study. The shape of CTAB is solid spherical and white in colour as shown in Table 3.

2.2. Preparation of Nanofluids

Three times filtration of all RBDPO and CO were carried by a membrane filter with a pore size of 0.2 µm before the synthesis process. The first part of synthesis procedure of RBDPO and CO based Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 nanofluids was carried out without CTAB as shown in Figure 1. The Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 were first dispersed individually into either RBDPO and CO through a Fisher Scientific isotemp heated magnetic stirrer at 800 rpm. After 30 min of stirring, the oil samples were rested at ambient temperature for 30 min. Next, the oil samples were dried through an air circulating oven at 85 °C for 48 h.
For the second part of synthesis with CTAB, RBDPO and CO were suspended individually with CTAB for 30 min by a magnetic stirrer as shown in Figure 2. The concentration of CTAB under study is 50% of the volume concentration of nanoparticles. It is based on the similar study in Reference [33] where the optimum concentration of surfactants is found at that concentration level. Next, the Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 were added individually into oil samples of which the stirring time was maintain for 30 min. Ultrasonic Homogenizer—Model 300VT was used to ensure well dispersion of Fe3O4, CuO, Al2O3 and CTAB in the oil samples and to reduce the agglomeration time. The sonication was carried out for 1 h. In total, 30 min of resting time at ambient temperature was given to the oil samples before it was subjected to drying process in an air circulating oven for 48 h at 85 °C. The final procedure was to rest the oil samples for 24 h at ambient temperature before the AC breakdown voltage measurement. The oil samples were stirred by magnetic stirrer during the AC breakdown voltage test as per ASTM D1816 [41]. The volume percentage concentrations of Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 used in this study were 0.001%, 0.025%, 0.035% and 0.05%. The moisture for the nanofluids could not be determined after the drying procedure for both synthesis processes due to difficulties to assess the commercial moisture measurement tester. However, based on the same drying procedure for base oil, the moisture ranges for RBDPOA, RBDPOB and CO are 143 ppm, 134 ppm and 150 ppm based on measurements by Metrohm 831 Karl Fischer (KF) Coulometer as per ASTM D6304 [42].

2.3. Nanoparticle Characterization

The morphology of the RBDPO and CO based Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 nanofluids were observed by JEOL JEM-2100F high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM). The point and lattice resolutions of the equipment can be up to 0.23 nm and 0.1 nm. The oil samples were first diluted with distilled water and one drop of diluted sample was placed on the copper grid. Next, the copper grid was placed for 15 min on a drop of uranyl acetate solution for staining purpose before placed in filter paper. Overnight drying of the copper grid was carried out at room temperature before viewed by HRTEM. For this measurement, only RBDPO and CO based Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 nanofluids with volume percentage concentrations of 0.05% were analyzed.

2.4. AC Breakdown Voltage

The AC breakdown voltage test was carried out based on ASTM D1816 at ambient temperature ranging between 25 °C and 34 °C. The AC breakdown voltage was carried by BAUR DPA 75C of which the oil samples were poured into a 500 mL test cell [41]. The equipment can measure AC breakdown voltage up to 75 kV ± 1 kV. VDE electrodes, each with a diameter of 36 mm were used for the test. The gap distance between electrodes was set to 1 mm. A uniform rise rate of 0.5 kV/s was subjected to the oil samples until the breakdown. The oil samples were stirred continuously during the breakdown. For each of the oil samples, 5 min resting interval time was given to ensure the breakdown by-products and bubbles dispersed out from the electrodes. In total, the average of 50 breakdown measurements was recorded for analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Fe3O4 Nanoparticle on RBDPO and CO

Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) images of the RBDPOA, RBDPOB and CO after 0.05 % addition of Fe3O4 without and with CTAB can be seen in Figure 3. The agglomerations of Fe3O4 for oil samples without CTAB shown in Figure 3a–c are more apparent as compared to oil samples with CTAB shown in Figure 3d,e.
Generally, the introduction of Fe3O4 generally causes reduction of AC breakdown voltage for RBDPO and CO without and with CTAB. Without CTAB, the AC breakdown voltage reduction trend for RBDPOA is almost linear as the volume concentrations of Fe3O4 increases from 0.001% to 0.05% as shown in Figure 4a. The AC breakdown voltage of RBDPOA decreases by 33% after addition 0.05% of Fe3O4. The same pattern is observed for RBDPOB except that there is a minor increment of AC breakdown voltage after 0.05% addition of Fe3O4. The AC breakdown voltage trend for CO is different from RBDPO where 0.001% of Fe3O4 initially causes significant reduction of AC breakdown voltage. With 0.025% addition of Fe3O4, the AC breakdown voltage of CO increases almost exponentially as the volume concentration of Fe3O4 increase to 0.05%.
The reductions of AC breakdown voltages are higher for oil samples with CTAB than without CTAB as shown in Figure 4b. Significant reductions of AC breakdown voltages are found for the oil samples after 0.025% addition of Fe3O4. The highest percentages of AC breakdown voltage reductions for RBDPOA, RBDPOB and CO are 46%, 48%, 37% after 0.05%, 0.035%, 0.05% addition of Fe3O4 respectively.
The AC breakdown voltages of different concentration of Fe3O4 at 1% probability are tabulated in Table 4 which have been determined by cumulative Weibull distribution function with scale parameter (α), shape parameter (β) and measured data (t) shown in Equation (1).
F(t|α,β) = 1 − e−(t/α)^β
It is shown that 0.001% addition of Fe3O4 can increase the AC breakdown voltages at 1% probability for most of the oil samples without and with CTAB as shown in Table 4. Only CO without CTAB shows enhancement of AC breakdown voltages at 1% probability at volume concentration of 0.05%. The highest percentage of improvement for AC breakdown voltage at 1% probability can be up to 31% for RBDPOB with CTAB. There is no clear improvement effect of CTAB on the of AC breakdown voltage at 1% probability for Fe3O4.

3.2. Effect of CuO Nanoparticle on RBDPO and CO

The TEM images for CuO disperse in RBDPO and CO without and with CTAB at volume concentration of 0.05% can be seen in Figure 5. For both RBDPO, the agglomerations of CuO decrease as CTAB is added as shown in Figure 5a,b,d,e. On the other hand, the TEM images in Figure 5c,f show no clear effect of CTAB on the agglomerations of CuO in CO.
A similar pattern is observed as Fe3O4 for CuO whereby majority of the AC breakdown voltages for RBDPO and CO decrease as the volume concentration of CuO increases. Without CTAB, the AC breakdown voltage of RBDPOA initially decreases as the volume concentration of CuO increases to 0.025% as shown in Figure 6a. As the volume concentration of CuO increases to 0.05%, the AC breakdown voltage of RBDPOA slightly increases but at a much lower level than the base oil. RBDPOB experiences significant reduction of AC breakdown voltage with 0.001% addition of CuO. As the volume concentration of CuO increases from 0.025% to 0.05%, the AC breakdown voltage of RBDPOB increases almost linearly to a final value of 34.1 kV. The AC breakdown voltage of CO decreases almost exponentially as the volume concentration of CuO increases.
The introduction of CTAB leads to further reduction of AC breakdown voltages for the oil samples as shown in Figure 6b. The oil samples show a steady decrement trend of AC breakdown voltages as the volume concentrations of CuO increases. The final AC breakdown voltages of RBDPOA, RBDPOB and CO after 0.05% addition of CuO are 16.3 kV, 16.8 kV and 16.1 kV respectively.
The introduction of CuO can only improve AC breakdown voltages at 1% probability for RBDPOA as seen Table 5. The highest percentages of AC breakdown voltage improvements for without and with CTAB are 16% and 27% after 0.035% and 0.001% addition of CuO. After introduction of CuO, RBDPOB and CO experience significant reductions of AC breakdown voltages at 1% probability either without or with CTAB.

3.3. Effect of Al2O3 Nanoparticle on RBDPO and CO

The effect of CTAB on the agglomerations of Al2O3 in the oil samples is not as clear as Fe3O4 and CuO as shown in Figure 7. For RBDPOA, it seems that the introduction of CTAB increases the agglomerations of Al2O3 as seen in Figure 7d. The agglomeration for RBDPOB seems almost unchanged with introduction of CTAB as shown in Figure 7e. On the other hand, CTAB reduces the agglomerations of Al2O3 for CO as seen in Figure 7f.
Without CTAB, there are increment patterns of AC breakdown voltages for RBDPOA and CO as the volume concentration of Al2O3 increases as seen in Figure 8a. The AC breakdown voltage of RBDPOA increases by 12% with 0.035% addition of Al2O3. Meanwhile, 0.05% addition of Al2O3 increases the AC breakdown voltage of CO by 12%. For RBDPOB, the AC breakdown voltage fluctuates at 40.6 kV and 42.1 kV as the volume concentration of Al2O3 increases. Only a minor increment of AC breakdown voltage for RBDPOB is found.
The patterns of AC breakdown voltages are slightly different for oil samples with CTAB as compare to without CTAB as seen in Figure 8b. The AC breakdown voltage of RBDPOA still shows AC breakdown voltage increment pattern as the volume concentration of Al2O3 increases. The highest percentage of AC breakdown voltage increment for RBDPOA is 18% after 0.035% addition of Al2O3. For RBDPOB, the AC breakdown voltage slightly decreases as 0.001% of Al2O3 is added and maintains as the volume concentration of Al2O3 increases. The AC breakdown voltage of CO decreases steadily as the volume concentration of Al2O3 increases until 0.035%. The AC breakdown voltage increases by 7% with 0.05% addition of Al2O3.
Apparent improvements of AC breakdown voltages at 1% probability are observed with introduction of Al2O3 either without or with CTAB as shown in Table 6. Without CTAB, the AC breakdown voltage at 1% probability for RBDPOA and RBDPOB can increase up to 40% and 33% with 0.025% addition Al2O3. The highest AC breakdown voltage improvement at 1% probability for CO can be up to 7%. The introduction of CTAB further improves the AC breakdown voltage at 1% probability for RBDPOA of which the highest percentage of increment can be up to 52% with 0.05% addition of Al2O3. The same pattern is observed for CO whereby, the AC breakdown voltage at 1% probability increases by 15% with 0.05% addition of Al2O3. However, the same significant improvement effect is not found for RBDPOB where the presence of CTAB can only increases the AC breakdown voltage at 1% probability up to 15% only with 0.001% addition of Al2O3.

4. Discussion

Based on the study, only insulative nanoparticle, Al2O3 could slightly improve the average AC breakdown voltage of RBDPO and CO either without or with CTAB as shown in Figure 8. In addition, the improvement of AC breakdown voltages of the oil samples take place at no specific volume concentrations of Al2O3 similar as reported in Reference [43]. It is due to the agglomerations of nanoparticles in oil samples could not be controlled with the increment of volume concentration of nanoparticles which in turn lead to the difficulties to identify the optimum concentration for AC breakdown voltage improvement [8,17]. Previous study has shown that Fe3O4 could improve the average AC breakdown voltage of vegetable oil such as rapeseed oil, natural ester FR3 and PFAE [5,20,44]. However, the current study shows that Fe3O4 could not improve the average AC breakdown voltages of RBDPO and CO either without or with CTAB as shown in Figure 4. It is possibly due to differences on the chemical composition between RBDPO/CO and other types of vegetable oils. Further investigation on this aspect is needed to confirm the findings in the future. CuO has shown to be capable of improving the average AC breakdown voltage of mineral oil [45]. The current study shows that there are no improvements on the average AC breakdown voltages of RBDPO and CO either without or with CTAB as shown in Figure 6. At the moment, there is yet any study on the effect of CuO on the average AC breakdown voltage for other types of vegetable oils. Further investigation is needed to extract the knowledge of the negative effect of CuO on the average AC breakdown voltage of RBDPO and CO through extensive study at the molecular level.
Meanwhile, the effects of CTAB on the AC breakdown voltages of RBDPO and CO filled with nanoparticles under study are not clear. Previous studies have shown that CTAB is one of the most common surfactants that can be used to reduce the agglomeration and improve dispersion of the nanoparticles in mineral oil, palm oil, coconut oil and soybean ester oil [11,25,26]. Previous studies on the palm ester oil and soybean ester oil based ZnO and TiO2 nanofluids show increments of AC breakdown voltages with introduction of CTAB. This is due to the fact that a charge trapping capability increases as a result of improvement of the nanoparticles aggregation [25,33]. However, the improvement of AC breakdown voltage of RBDPO based CuO nanofluid in the presence of CTAB found in Reference [33] is somehow contradictory to the current study. The repeated test in the current study reveals that the AC breakdown voltages of the oil samples further decreases as CTAB is introduced. The finding in the current study as shown in Figure 4b and Figure 6b is in line with Reference [26], which shows that CTAB has no clear impact on the AC breakdown voltage of RBDPO based TiO2 nanofluids. This is possibly due to limited compatibility of CTAB with certain nanoparticles and its viscosity effect. Previous study on mineral based TiO2 nanofluids reveals that the attraction force between the nanoparticles and CTAB can also lead to the agglomerations among these opposite charged particles [11]. These agglomerations could initiate low charge trapping and deformation in the electric field which to a certain extent affect the AC breakdown voltage [8,11]. The high viscosities of RBDPO and CO could also cause suspension of nanoparticles which in turn lead to no apparent positive impact of CTAB on AC breakdown voltages.
Generally, the current findings show that the introduction of nanoparticles at certain volume concentrations could increase the AC breakdown voltage at 1% probability for RBDPO and CO either with or without CTAB as shown in Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6. All nanoparticles show positive impact on the AC breakdown voltage at 1% probability of RBDPO and CO at certain volume concentrations of which Al2O3 gives the highest improvement. From the practical point of view, the improvement of the AC breakdown voltage at the lowest probability could help to improve the design of transformers filled with vegetable-based nanofluids in the future.

5. Conclusions

The AC breakdown voltages of RBDPOA, RBDPOB and CO slightly increase with the introduction of Al2O3 either without or with CTAB. RBDPO and CO show clear decrement trends of average AC breakdown voltages with the introduction of Fe3O4 and CuO either without and with CTAB. Significant improvement of AC breakdown voltage at 1% probability is found with the introduction of Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 at certain volume concentrations. However, there is no clear knowledge that can be obtained on the best volume concentration of nanoparticles which can give the optimum improvement of AC breakdown voltages of RBDPO and CO. The introduction of CTAB gives improvement on the agglomeration and increases the dispersion of the nanoparticles in majority of the RBDPO and CO based on TEM imaging. However, this phenomenon has no direct effect on the AC breakdown voltages of RBDPO and CO, which implies the complexity of vegetable-based nanofluids fundamentals application in transformers.

Author Contributions

The research study was successfully completed with contributions from all authors. The main research idea, experimental works, and manuscript preparation were contributed by N.A.M. N.A. contributed to the manuscript preparation and research idea. J.J., M.Z.A.A.K. and R.Y. assisted with finalizing the research work and manuscript. Z.Y. provided several suggestions from an industrial perspective. All authors revised and approved the publication of the paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ministry of Education and Universiti Putra Malaysia for the funding under PUTRA IPS and IPB schemes (GP-IPS/2015/9462100), (GP-IPB/2014/9440801). Special thanks to Hyrax Oil Sdn. Bhd and Malaysia Transformer Manufacturing Sdn. Bhd. for the technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Nomenclature

αScale parameters
βShape parameters
tMeasured data
kVKilo Voltage
Fe3O4Iron (II,III) Oxide
Fe2O3Iron (III) Oxide
ZnOZinc Oxide
SiO2Silicone Oxide
TiO2Titanium Oxide
Al2O3Aluminium Oxide
CuOCopper (II) Oxide
ZrO2Zirconium Dioxide
MWCNTMulti-wall Carbon Nanotubes
AINAluminium Nitride

References

  1. Khaled, U.; Beroual, A. AC Dielectric Strength of Mineral Oil-Based Fe3O4 and Al2O3 Nanofluids. Energies 2018, 11, 3505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Raymon, A.; Sakthibalan, S.; Cinthal, C.; Subramaniaraja, R.; Yuvaraj, M. Enhancement and Comparison of Nano-ester Insulating Fluids. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2016, 23, 892–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Du, B.; Li, J.; Wang, F.; Yao, W.; Yao, S. Influence of Monodisperse Fe3O4 Nanoparticle Size on Electrical Properties of Vegetable Oil-based Nanofluids. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 560352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lv, Y.Z.; Wang, J.; Yi, K.; Wang, W.; Li, C. Effect of Oleic Acid Surface Modification on Dispersion Stability and Breakdown Strength of Vegetable Oil-based Fe3O4 Nanofluids. Integr. Ferroelectr. 2015, 163, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zou, P.; Grzybowski, S.; Zahn, M. Preparation of a Vegetable Oil-based Nanofluid and Investigation of Its Breakdown and Dielectric Properties. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 2012, 28, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hwang, J.G.; Zahn, M.; O’Sullivan, F.M.; Petterson, L.A.A.; Hjortstam, O.; Liu, R. Effect of Nanoparticle Charging on Streamer Development in Transformer Oil-based Nanofluids. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xuan, Y.; Li, Q. Heat Transfer Enhancement of Nanofluids. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 2000, 21, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rafiq, M.; Lv, Y.Z.; Li, C. A Review on Properties, Opportunities, and Challenges of Transformer Oil-based Nanofluids. J. Nanomater. 2016, 2016, 8371560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, W.; Xie, H.Q. A Review on Nanofluids: Preparation, Stability Mechanism and Applications. J. Nanomater. 2012, 2012, 435873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lv, Y.Z.; Zhou, Y.; Li, C.R.; Wang, Q.; Qi, B. Recent Progress in Nanofluids Based on Transformer Oil: Preparation and Electrical Insulation Properties. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 2014, 30, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Atiya, E.G.; Mansour, D.E.A.; Khattab, R.M.; Azmy, A.M. Dispersion Behavior and Breakdown Strength of Transformer Oil Filled with TiO2 Nanoparticles. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2015, 22, 2463–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ranjan, N.; Pratash, R.T.A.R.; Roy, N.K. Ageing Performance on Mineral Oil using ZnO Nanofluids. Int. J. Innov. Eng. Technol. 2016, 6, 155–162. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, J.; Du, B.; Wang, F.; Yao, W.; Yao, S. The Effect of Nanoparticle Surfactant Polarization on Trapping Depth of Vegetable Insulating Oil-based Nanofluids. Phys. Lett. A 2016, 380, 604–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lv, Y.Z.; Du, Y.F.; Zhou, J.Q.; Li, X.X.; Chen, M.T.; Li, C.R.; Wang, G.L. Nanoparticle Effect on Electrical Properties of Aged Mineral Oil based Nanofluids. CIGRE 2012, D1-106, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, Y.; Wu, J. Investigation on Relationship between Breakdown Strength Enhancement of Composites and Dielectric Characteristics of Nanoparticle. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2016, 23, 927–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ghasemi, J.; Jafarmadar, S.; Nazari, M. Effect of Magnetic Nanoparticles on the Lightning Impulse Breakdown Voltage of Transformer Oil. J. Magn. Mater. 2015, 389, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Du, Y.F.; Lv, Y.Z.; Zhou, J.Q.; Li, X.X.; Li, C.R. Breakdown Properties of Transformer Oil-based TiO2 Nanofluid. In Proceedings of the Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP’10), West Lafayette, IN, USA, 17–20 October 2010; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, J.C.; Seo, H.S.; Kim, Y.J. The Increased Dielectric Breakdown Voltage of Transformer Oil-based Nanofluids by an External Magnetic Field. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2012, 62, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Du, Y.F.; Lv, Y.Z.; Li, C.R.; Chen, M.; Zhong, Y.X.; Zhou, J.Q.; Li, X.X.; Zhou, Y. Effect of Semiconductive Nanoparticles on Insulating Performances of Transformer Oil. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2012, 19, 770–776. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mohamad, M.S.; Zainuddin, H.; Ab Ghani, S.; Chairul, I.S. AC Breakdown Voltage and Viscosity of Palm Fatty Acid Ester (PFAE) Oil-Based Nanofluids. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 2017, 12, 2333–2341. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, Q.; Rafiq, M.; Lv, Y.Z.; Li, C.R.; Yi, K. Preparation of Three Types of Transformer Oil-based Nanofluids and Comparative Study on the Effect of Nanoparticle Concentrations on Insulating Property of Transformer Oil. J. Nanotechnol. 2016, 2016, 5802753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Peppas, G.D.; Bakandritsos, A.; Charalampakos, V.P.; Pyrqioti, E.C.; Tucek, J.; Zboril, R.; Gonos, I.F. Ultrastable Natural Ester-based Nanofluids for High Voltage Insulation Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 25202–25209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Du, Y.F.; Lv, Y.Z.; Li, C.; Chen, M.; Zhou, J.; Li, X.X.; Zhou, Y.; Tu, Y. Effect of Electron Shallow Trap on Breakdown Performance of Transformer Oil-based Nanofluids. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110, 104104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhong, Y.; Lv, Y.; Li, C.; Du, Y.; Chen, M.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, L. Insulating Properties and Charge Characteristics of Natural Ester Fluid Modified by TiO2 Semiconductive Nanoparticles. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2013, 20, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saenkhumwong, W.; Suksri, A. The Improved Dielectric Properties of Natural Ester Oil by using ZnO and TiO2 Nanoparticles. Eng. Appl. Sci. Res. 2017, 44, 148–153. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nor, S.F.M.; Azis, N.; Jasni, J.; Ab Kadir, M.Z.A.; Yunus, R.; Yaakub, Z. Investigation on the Electrical Properties of Palm Oil and Coconut Oil based TiO2 Nanofluids. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2017, 24, 3432–3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mansour, D.-E.A.; Elsaeed, A.M.; Izzularab, M.A. The Role of Interfacial Zone in Dielectric Properties of Transformer Oil-based Nanofluids. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2016, 23, 3364–3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huifei, J.; Andritsch, T.; Tsekmes, I.A.; Kochetov, R.; Morshuis, P.H.F.; Smit, J.J. Properties of Mineral Oil based Silica Nanofluids. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2014, 21, 1100–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Prasad, D.; Chandrasekar, S. Investigations on Dielectric Performance Characteristics of Natural Ester based Nano-fluids for Power Transformer Applications. Asian J. Res. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2016, 6, 1146–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dong, M.; Dai, J.; Li, Y.; Xie, J.; Ren, M.; Dang, Z. Insight into the Dielectric Response of Transformer Oil-based Nanofluids. AIP Adv. 2017, 7, 025307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fontes, D.H.; Ribatski, G.; Filho, E.P.B. Experimental Evaluation of Thermal Conductivity, Viscosity and Breakdown Voltage AC of Nanofluids of Carbon Nanotubes and Diamond in Transformer Oil. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2015, 58, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, D.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Jin, F. Characterization of High Performance AIN Nanoparticle-based Transformer Oil Nanofluids. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2016, 23, 2757–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mohamad, N.A.; Azis, N.; Jasni, J.; Yunus, R.; Ab Kadir, M.Z.A.; Yaakub, Z. Effects of Different Types of Surfactants on AC Breakdown Voltage of Refined, Bleached and Deodorized Palm Oil based CuO Nanofluids. In Proceedings of the IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, 7–10 October 2018; pp. 768–771. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cavallini, A.; Karthik, R.; Negri, F. The Effect of Magnetite, Graphene Oxide and Silicone Oxide Nanoparticles on Dielectric Withstand Characteristics of Mineral Oil. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2015, 22, 2592–2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Karthik, R.; Raymon, A. Effect of Silicone Oxide Nanoparticles on Dielectric Characteristics of Natural Ester. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on High Voltage Engineering and Application (ICHVE), Chengdu, China, 19–22 September 2016; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jin, H.; Morshuis, P.H.F.; Smit, J.J.; Andritsch, T. The Effect of Surface Treatment of Silica Nanoparticles on the Breakdown Strength of Mineral Oil. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Liquid Dielectrics (ICDL), Bled, Slovenia, 29 June–3 July 2014; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee, J.C.; Kim, W.Y. Experimental Study on the Dielectric Breakdown Voltage of the Insulating Oil Mixed with Magnetic Nanoparticles. Phys. Procedia 2012, 32, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Rafiq, M.; Li, C.; Ge, Y.; Lv, Y.; Yi, K. Effect of Fe3O4 nanoparticle concentrations on dielectric property of transformer oil. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference High Voltage Engineering Application (ICHVE), Chengdu, China, 19–22 September 2016; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  39. ISO 5508:1990. Animal and Vegetable Fats and Oils-Analysis by Gas Chromatography (GC) of Methyl-Esters of Fatty Acids; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hwang, Y.; Lee, J.K.; Lee, C.H.; Jung, Y.M.; Cheong, S.I.; Lee, C.G.; Ku, B.C.; Jang, S.P. Stability and Thermal Conductivity Characteristics of Nanofluids. Thermochim. Acta 2007, 455, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. ASTM D1816. Standard Test Method for Dielectric Breakdown Voltage of Insulating Liquids Using VDE Electrodes; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  42. ASTM D6304. Standard Test Method for Determination of Water in Petroleum Products, Lubricating Oils and Additives by Coulometric Karl Fisher Titration; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  43. Michal, O.; Mentlík, V.; Trnka, P.; Hornak, J.; Totzauer, P. Dielectric Properties of Biodegradable Vegetable Oil based Nanofluid. In Proceedings of the 19th International Scientific Conference on Electric Power Engineering (EPE), Brno, Czech Republic, 16–18 May 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  44. Du, B.; Li, J.; Yang, L.J.; Yao, W.; Yao, S. Dielectric Properties of Vegetable Oil Modified by Monodispersed Fe3O4 Nanoparticles. In Proceedings of the International Conference on High Voltage Engineering and Application (ICHVE), Poznan, Poland, 8–11 September 2014; pp. 4–7. [Google Scholar]
  45. Karthik, R.; Raja, T.S.R.; Madavan, R. Enhancement of Critical Characteristics of Transformer Oil using Nanomaterials. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2013, 38, 2725–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Energies 12 01605 g001 550
Figure 1. The synthesis process of oil and nanoparticles without Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB).
Figure 1. The synthesis process of oil and nanoparticles without Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB).
Energies 12 01605 g001
Energies 12 01605 g002 550
Figure 2. The synthesis process of oil and nanoparticles with CTAB.
Figure 2. The synthesis process of oil and nanoparticles with CTAB.
Energies 12 01605 g002
Energies 12 01605 g003 550
Figure 3. Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) images for (a) Refined, Bleached and Deodorized Palm Oil A (RBDPOA), (b) Refined, Bleached and Deodorized Palm Oil B (RBDPOB) and (c) Coconut Oil (CO) without the presence of CTAB and (d) RBDPOA, (e) RBDPOB and (f) CO with the presence of CTAB at 0.05% of Fe3O4.
Figure 3. Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) images for (a) Refined, Bleached and Deodorized Palm Oil A (RBDPOA), (b) Refined, Bleached and Deodorized Palm Oil B (RBDPOB) and (c) Coconut Oil (CO) without the presence of CTAB and (d) RBDPOA, (e) RBDPOB and (f) CO with the presence of CTAB at 0.05% of Fe3O4.
Energies 12 01605 g003
Energies 12 01605 g004 550
Figure 4. Effect of Fe3O4 on the AC breakdown voltage of RBDPO and CO (a) without CTAB and (b) with CTAB.
Figure 4. Effect of Fe3O4 on the AC breakdown voltage of RBDPO and CO (a) without CTAB and (b) with CTAB.
Energies 12 01605 g004
Energies 12 01605 g005 550
Figure 5. TEM images for (a) RBDPOA, (b) RBDPOB and (c) CO without the presence of CTAB and (d) RBDPOA, (e) RBDPOB and (f) CO with the presence of CTAB at 0.05% of CuO.
Figure 5. TEM images for (a) RBDPOA, (b) RBDPOB and (c) CO without the presence of CTAB and (d) RBDPOA, (e) RBDPOB and (f) CO with the presence of CTAB at 0.05% of CuO.
Energies 12 01605 g005
Energies 12 01605 g006 550
Figure 6. Effect of CuO on AC breakdown voltage of RBDPO and CO (a) without CTAB and (b) with CTAB.
Figure 6. Effect of CuO on AC breakdown voltage of RBDPO and CO (a) without CTAB and (b) with CTAB.
Energies 12 01605 g006
Energies 12 01605 g007 550
Figure 7. TEM images for (a) RBDPOA, (b) RBDPOB and (c) CO without the presence of CTAB and (d) RBDPOA, (e) RBDPOB and (f) CO with the presence of CTAB at 0.05% of Al2O3.
Figure 7. TEM images for (a) RBDPOA, (b) RBDPOB and (c) CO without the presence of CTAB and (d) RBDPOA, (e) RBDPOB and (f) CO with the presence of CTAB at 0.05% of Al2O3.
Energies 12 01605 g007
Energies 12 01605 g008 550
Figure 8. Effect of Al2O3 on AC breakdown voltage of RBDPO and CO (a) without CTAB and (b) with CTAB.
Figure 8. Effect of Al2O3 on AC breakdown voltage of RBDPO and CO (a) without CTAB and (b) with CTAB.
Energies 12 01605 g008
Table
Table 1. Fatty acid content, fat and vitamin E/A content of all samples.
Table 1. Fatty acid content, fat and vitamin E/A content of all samples.
Types of FatsTypes of Fatty AcidsRBDPOARBDPOBCO
GC (%)MD (g)GC (%)MD (g)GC (%)MD (g)
SaturatedC6: Caproic-45.4-43.0-92.8
C8: Caprylic---
C10: Capric---
C12: Lauric0.30.348.6
C14:Myristic1.10.920.0
C16: Palmitic37.739.39.5
C18: Stearic3.94.23.2
MonounsaturatedC18: Oleic42.343.043.043.06.03.6
PolyunsaturatedC18: Linoleic12.411.610.414.01.13.6
C18:Linolenic0.30.2-
Vitamin E -4.4 × 10−3-75 × 10−3--
Vitamin A -264 × 10−6----
* GC = Gas Chromatography; MD = Manufacturer’s Datasheet; RBDPOA = Refined, Bleached and Deodorized Palm Oil A; RBDPOB = Refined, Bleached and Deodorized Palm Oil B; CO = Coconut Oil.
Table
Table 2. Basic properties of Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 nanoparticles [6,40].
Table 2. Basic properties of Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 nanoparticles [6,40].
PropertiesFe3O4CuOAl2O3
Size (nm)50–100<5040
Appearance colourBlackBlackWhite
Density (g/cm3)5.176.313.96
Relative permittivity8018.19.9
Electrical conductivity (S/m)1 × 104–1 × 1051 × 1071 × 10−12
Thermal conductivity (W/m.K)4–876.530
Table
Table 3. Basic properties of Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB) nanoparticles [6,40].
Table 3. Basic properties of Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB) nanoparticles [6,40].
PropertiesCTAB
DescriptionCationic
FormSolid
ColourWhite
Melting point (°C)248–251
Flash point (°C)244
FlammabilityNot flammable
Table
Table 4. AC breakdown voltage of Refined, Bleached and Deodorized Palm Oil (RBDPO) and Coconut Oil (CO) at 1% probability at different concentration of Fe3O4.
Table 4. AC breakdown voltage of Refined, Bleached and Deodorized Palm Oil (RBDPO) and Coconut Oil (CO) at 1% probability at different concentration of Fe3O4.
SamplesVolume of Concentration (%)Breakdown Voltage at 1% Probability (kV)
Without CTABWith CTAB
RBDPOA021.6021.60
0.00127.6925.27
0.02520.7214.90
0.03514.8217.88
0.0515.8610.40
RBDPOB025.8825.88
0.00127.1733.93
0.02524.5813.81
0.03519.6815.29
0.0524.3225.88
CO027.2127.21
0.00111.6427.32
0.02518.9619.54
0.03524.3126.44
0.0530.0317.29
Table
Table 5. AC breakdown voltage of RBDPO and CO at 1% probability at different concentration of CuO.
Table 5. AC breakdown voltage of RBDPO and CO at 1% probability at different concentration of CuO.
SamplesVolume of Concentration (%)Breakdown Voltage at 1% Probability (kV)
Without CTABWith CTAB
RBDPOA021.6021.60
0.00119.3627.44
0.02517.8426.13
0.03525.0124.23
0.0518.426.36
RBDPOB025.8825.88
0.00120.0221.56
0.02516.7622.22
0.03524.3921.50
0.0522.607.98
CO027.2127.21
0.00122.3521.21
0.02521.0215.41
0.03519.6515.01
0.0522.679.33
Table
Table 6. AC breakdown voltage of RBDPO and CO at 1% probability at different concentration Al2O3.
Table 6. AC breakdown voltage of RBDPO and CO at 1% probability at different concentration Al2O3.
SamplesVolume of Concentration (%)Breakdown Voltage at 1% Probability (kV)
Without CTABWith CTAB
RBDPOA021.6021.60
0.00123.5730.75
0.02530.3231.68
0.03528.5032.24
0.0523.4932.81
RBDPOB025.8825.88
0.00128.7029.65
0.02534.3525.03
0.03527.8526.92
0.0523.4725.99
CO027.2127.21
0.00128.1020.98
0.02528.5424.45
0.03529.1224.05
0.0527.4431.20

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohamad, N.A.; Azis, N.; Jasni, J.; Ab Kadir, M.Z.A.; Yunus, R.; Yaakub, Z. Impact of Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 on the AC Breakdown Voltage of Palm Oil and Coconut Oil in the Presence of CTAB. Energies 2019, 12, 1605. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091605

AMA Style

Mohamad NA, Azis N, Jasni J, Ab Kadir MZA, Yunus R, Yaakub Z. Impact of Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 on the AC Breakdown Voltage of Palm Oil and Coconut Oil in the Presence of CTAB. Energies. 2019; 12(9):1605. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091605

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohamad, Nur Aqilah, Norhafiz Azis, Jasronita Jasni, Mohd Zainal Abidin Ab Kadir, Robiah Yunus, and Zaini Yaakub. 2019. "Impact of Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 on the AC Breakdown Voltage of Palm Oil and Coconut Oil in the Presence of CTAB" Energies 12, no. 9: 1605. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091605

APA Style

Mohamad, N. A., Azis, N., Jasni, J., Ab Kadir, M. Z. A., Yunus, R., & Yaakub, Z. (2019). Impact of Fe3O4, CuO and Al2O3 on the AC Breakdown Voltage of Palm Oil and Coconut Oil in the Presence of CTAB. Energies, 12(9), 1605. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091605

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop