Next Article in Journal
The Nuclear Power Dilemma—Between Perception and Reality
Previous Article in Journal
Study of the Greitzer Model for Centrifugal Compressors: Variable Lc Parameter and Two Types of Surge
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Fuel Cycle Implications of Nuclear Process Heat

1
National Nuclear Laboratory, Chadwick House, Warrington WA3 6AE, UK
2
School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(22), 6073; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13226073
Submission received: 13 August 2020 / Revised: 26 October 2020 / Accepted: 11 November 2020 / Published: 20 November 2020

Abstract

International and UK fuel cycle scenario analyses performed to date have focused on nuclear plants producing electricity without considering in detail the other potential drivers for nuclear power, such as industrial process heat. Part of the reason behind the restricted applications of nuclear power is because the assumptions behind the future scenario are not fully captured, for example how big are demands from different sectors? Here we present a means to fully capture the potential opportunities for nuclear power using Sankey diagrams and then, using this information, consider for the first time in the UK the fuel cycle implications of decarbonising industrial heat demand in the year 2050 with nuclear power using the ORION fuel cycle code to study attributes related to spent fuel, uranium demand and decay heat from the spent fuel. We show that even in high industrial energy demand scenarios, the sensitivity of spent fuel masses and decay heat to the types of reactor deployed is relatively small compared to the greater fuel cycle demands from large-scale deployment of nuclear plants for electricity production. However, the sensitivity of spent fuel volumes depends heavily on the extent to which High Temperature Reactor and Light Water Reactor systems operating on a once-through cycle are deployed.
Keywords: fuel cycle; nuclear; process heat; ORION; spent nuclear fuel; HTR; SFR; SMR fuel cycle; nuclear; process heat; ORION; spent nuclear fuel; HTR; SFR; SMR

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peakman, A.; Gregg, R. The Fuel Cycle Implications of Nuclear Process Heat. Energies 2020, 13, 6073. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13226073

AMA Style

Peakman A, Gregg R. The Fuel Cycle Implications of Nuclear Process Heat. Energies. 2020; 13(22):6073. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13226073

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peakman, Aiden, and Robert Gregg. 2020. "The Fuel Cycle Implications of Nuclear Process Heat" Energies 13, no. 22: 6073. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13226073

APA Style

Peakman, A., & Gregg, R. (2020). The Fuel Cycle Implications of Nuclear Process Heat. Energies, 13(22), 6073. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13226073

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop