Next Article in Journal
Role of Architectural Design in Creating Circadian-Effective Interior Settings
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Donor–Acceptor Copolymers Derived from Diketopyrrolopyrrole and Fluorene via Eco-Friendly Direct Arylation: Nonlinear Optical Properties, Transient Absorption Spectroscopy, and Theoretical Modeling
Previous Article in Journal
Contaminant Source Identification from Finite Sensor Data: Perron–Frobenius Operator and Bayesian Inference
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Light Irradiation on the Diffusion Rate of the Charge Carrier Hopping Mechanism in P3HT–ZnO Nanoparticles Studied by μ+SR

1
Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21, Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
2
Graduate School of Engineering and Science, Shibaura Institute of Technology, 307 Fukasaku, Minuma, Saitama 337-8570, Japan
3
Meson Science Laboratory, RIKEN Nishina Center, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(20), 6730; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206730
Submission received: 23 August 2021 / Revised: 7 October 2021 / Accepted: 9 October 2021 / Published: 16 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Organic and Hybrid Opto-Electronics)

Abstract

:
Blended regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles are a hybrid material developed as an active layer for hybrid solar cells. The study of the hopping mechanisms and diffusion rates of regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles is significant for obtaining intrinsic charge transport properties that provide helpful information for preparing high-performance solar cells. The temperature dependences of the parallel and perpendicular diffusion rates in regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles determined from muon spin relaxation measurements were investigated by applying various longitudinal fields. We investigated the effect of light irradiation on the diffusion rates in regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles. We found that with increasing temperature, the parallel diffusion rate decreased, while the perpendicular diffusion rate increased. The ratio of the parallel to perpendicular diffusion rate ( D / D ) can be used to indicate the dominant charge carrier hopping mechanism. Without light irradiation, perpendicular diffusion dominates the charge carrier hopping, starting at 25 K, with a ratio of 1.70 × 10 4 , whereas with light irradiation, the perpendicular diffusion of the charge carrier starts to dominate at the temperature of 10 K, with a ratio of 2.40 × 10 4 . It is indicated that the additional energy from light irradiation affects the diffusion, especially the charge diffusion in the perpendicular direction.

1. Introduction

Photovoltaic solar cells are very promising devices for development as a tool for converting solar energy into electrical energy. Various studies have been carried out to optimize the utilization of solar energy, either by modifying the material in photovoltaic solar cells [1,2,3,4,5,6] or by designing optical devices that can increase the maximum utilization of solar energy harvested at any time in various natural conditions [7].
The materials developed as photovoltaic materials consist of organic, inorganic, and hybrid materials. Each of these materials has its own unique characteristics and its own advantages and disadvantages. Organic solar cells exhibit great advantages, such as lightweightedness, allowing easy fabrication, and low cost. However, their power conversion efficiency (PCE) is still lower than that of inorganic solar cells. Recently, PCE as high as 18.4% was reported for organic solar cells [8], which is still lower than that for inorganic silicon heterojunction solar cells, with a PCE of 26% [3]. There have been many attempts to improve the PCE of organic solar cells, such as modifying the active material of solar cells [4]. Among organic materials, conjugated polymer materials have been widely used as active materials in solar cell devices. In particular, during the last few years, poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) has been used as a polymer donor in solar cell research [5]. P3HT is widely used because of its light absorption as well as higher hole mobility compared with other conjugated polymers [6,9]. In addition to PCE, organic-based solar cell devices still have some deficits in their performance, such as weak absorption at visible wavelengths, poor charge transport, and low stability [5]. To overcome the various deficits of organic solar cells and to improve their performance, many researchers have developed solar cells with materials derived from combinations of organic and inorganic materials known as hybrid solar cells [10].
The development of hybrid solar cells is attracting great interest because of the various advantages of this material [11]. Hybrid solar cells combine the superior properties of organic and inorganic materials. Organic materials, such as P3HT, are used as donors to absorb sunlight and transport holes, while inorganic materials, such as semiconductors of CdSe, TiO2, and ZnO, are used as acceptors to transport electrons [10]. Previous studies have revealed that inorganic materials of nanoparticle size enhance optical absorption [12]. One material currently widely used is ZnO because it is easy to synthesize ZnO at nanoparticle sizes [13,14]. Another advantage of ZnO is that it is nontoxic compared with CdSe [10]. For electron mobility, ZnO has a higher value ( 2 × 10 3 cm2/V·s) than TiO2 ( 1 × 10 4 cm2/V·s) [15]. A high electron mobility facilitates efficient electron transport and produces high-efficiency solar cells [15,16,17]. In addition, ZnO nanoparticles have a lower conduction band than the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of P3HT, which facilitates the transport of electrons from donor to acceptor [18]. Thus, a combination of P3HT and ZnO nanoparticles can be used to achieve the expected and improved performance in hybrid solar cells [16,17], although the PCE for the hybrid solar cells is still less than 1% [19].
One important characteristic of hybrid solar cells that needs to be investigated is the charge carrier mobility. The charge carrier mobility is a crucial parameter for optimizing solar cell performance, especially related to charge extraction and charge carrier recombination [20]. The value of the charge carrier mobility can be obtained from electron spin resonance (ESR) or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements. However, these two measurements require a high concentration of doping in order to obtain the mobility value; this renders the intrinsic properties of the undoped material unable to be observed properly. To obtain the value of the charge carrier mobility in a material with a low doping concentration, muon spin relaxation (μ+SR) measurement is a suitable technique [21,22]. When a muon is implanted into the polymer sample, it interferes with the carbon double bonds in the polymer and forms muonium (the bound state of the positively charged muon and electrons), which gives rise to unpaired electrons and an accompanying polarization field, called the negative polaron, in the polymer chain. When the longitudinal magnetic field is applied to the sample, the polaron moves away and diffuses parallel (intra) and perpendicular (inter) to the polymer chain [23,24,25,26].
In a previous μ+SR study, an active layer of hybrid solar cells of regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles was measured with light irradiation, and it was found that at 10 K, the charge carrier transport was dominated by three-dimensional interchain diffusion [27,28], which differs from the μ+SR measurements without light irradiation, in which the three-dimensional diffusion was observed at the higher temperature of 25 K [29]. However, the values of the intrachain and interchain diffusion rates for the blended regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles have not been reported. The diffusion rate of charge carrier transport needs to be estimated to obtain information about the number of charge carriers that can be transported either intra or interchain in order to estimate the solar cell’s efficiency. This is because solar cells’ efficiency strongly depends on the charge carrier mobility, which correlates with the diffusion rate. Hence, it is necessary to determine the diffusion rate in order to obtain solar cells with high efficiency.
In this paper, we report the diffusion rates of blended regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles determined using longitudinal field muon spin relaxation (LF-μ+SR), and the effect of light irradiation on the diffusion rate. By analyzing the μ+SR spectra, the hopping mechanism and the diffusion rate of the charge carriers in the sample can be calculated. The calculation and analysis were based on an empirical function using the equations relating to the relaxation rate data as a function of the HLF with the diffusion rates [30,31,32,33]. This paper is organized as follows: Section 1 is an introduction describing the state of the diffusion rates and the reason for choosing the regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles as the material to be investigated. Section 2 explains the method for the material preparation and measurement of the μ+SR as well as the calculations and data analysis based on empirical functions. Section 3 presents the main results from the μ+SR data and discusses the analysis of the diffusion rate calculations. Finally, we present conclusions from this research in Section 4.

2. Materials and Methods

High-quality regio-regular P3HT was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. ZnO nanoparticles were synthesized by the sol-gel method using zinc acetate dehydrate (Merck, >99.9%) as a precursor, with sodium hydroxide (Merck, >99.9%) as a catalyst, and in methanol, as a solvent [34]. The relative amount of ZnO nanoparticles was 20 wt% for the regio-regular P3HT. The process of mixing regio-regular P3HT and ZnO nanoparticles was as follows: regio-regular P3HT (150 mg) was dissolved in chlorobenzene (2.91 mL) and stirred at room temperature to obtain homogeneous solutions. Separately, ZnO nanoparticles (30 mg) were dispersed in methanol (0.09 mL) followed by dispersion in an ultrasonic bath for 10 min. The ZnO nanoparticles dispersed in solution were added to the regio-regular P3HT solution, and the mixture was stirred for 2 h at 40 °C. Bulk samples of regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles were obtained by evaporating the solutions at 150 °C for 2 h [14].
We performed μ+SR experiments in various longitudinal fields (LF) ranging from 0 to 395 mT, and at temperatures of 10 K, 15 K, 25 K, 50 K, and 300 K for samples of regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles in conditions with and without white light irradiation (with a pulse-type flash lamp, 130 W, with 50 J per flash) at the RIKEN-RAL Muon Facility in the UK [27,28]. We collected 30 million events for every dataset.
The data obtained from μ+SR measurements were the time-dependent asymmetry, and they were fitted using a simple exponential function as shown in Equation (1) [26,27,28,29,35,36,37,38,39].
A   t   =   A 1 exp λ 1 t   +   A 2 exp λ 2 t
The asymmetry function is divided into the fast and slow components. A 1 and A 2 are the initial asymmetries; λ 1 and λ 2 are the depolarization rates of the fast and slow components, respectively.
From Equation (1), the values of λ for each field (HLF) at a certain temperature were obtained. The dependence of λ on HLF can be refitted using the function of Equation (2) or (3) to obtain information on the direction of charge carrier hopping as previously reported [26,27,28,29,30,31,35,36,37,38,39]. If the field dependence (HLF) of λ can be fitted properly using Equation (2), then the charge carrier hopping can be defined as one-dimensional intrachain hopping diffusion.
λ = c H LF 0.5
If the field dependence (HLF) of λ can be fitted properly using Equation (3), the charge carrier hopping can be defined as three-dimensional interchain hopping diffusion.
λ = c H LF 0.5
The diffusion rate calculations were extracted from the equation for the relaxation rate as a function of the HLF, as shown in Equation (4) [30].
λ H LF   =   ρ Ω z f ω μ   +   Ω + f ω e
where ω = γ H , γ are gyromagnetic ratios, ρ is the spin density, Ω z and Ω + are geometrical factors that are related to the scalar and dipolar hyperfine coupling parameters, and f ω is the spectral density of the spin correlation function as previously reported for calculating the diffusion rate in polymer samples, as shown in Equation (5) [31,32,33].
f ω   =   1 4 D D 1 + 1 + ω 2 D 2 1 + ω 2 D 2
The values of the parameters used in the calculation are ρ Ω z = 150   MHz 2 , Ω + / Ω z = 14 , γ μ = 135.5387   MHz / T , and γ e = 28,024.95164   MHz / T [30,31,32,33].
For the parallel diffusion rate ( D ), the value of D can be obtained by examining the function in Equation (6). The high HLF dependence of λ as shown in Figure 1 can be well fitted using Equation (2).
D = 2 ρ 2 c 2 Ω z γ μ + Ω + γ e 2
where c is the gradient in Equation (2) that was acquired from the fitting method.
For the perpendicular diffusion rate ( D ), the value of D has to be determined using Equation (7). At low HLF, the λ value is approximately constant as shown in Figure 1.
D = 2 ρ 2 Ω z + Ω + 2 λ 0 D
where D is already obtained following the previous explanation, and λ 0 is the average value of λ in the constant region, or alternatively, λ 0 can be approximated as the value of λ when HLF is zero.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows time dependence of the asymmetry data for regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles for various applied longitudinal fields with and without light irradiation at temperatures of 10 K, 15 K, 25 K, 50 K, and 300 K. All the asymmetry data were well fitted using Equation (1). The initial asymmetry shifted to higher values with increasing HLF as a result of the depolarization of the muonium state [40].
To demonstrate the effect of light irradiation, asymmetry data with and without light irradiation at 15 K and 25 K for a HLF of 10 mT are shown in Figure 3. When using light irradiation, the asymmetry shifts slightly higher due to the addition of energy that affects the depolarization of the muonium state, which may also affect the transport of charge carriers.
Figure 4 shows the HLF dependence of the depolarization rate λ 1 of the regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles with and without light irradiation at temperatures of 10 K, 15 K, 25 K, 50 K, and 300 K. The value of λ 1 was extracted from the fitting result for the asymmetry data using Equation (1). Without light irradiation, the dependence of HLF on λ 1 for temperatures of 10 K and 15 K showed a linear trend in a log–log plot that could be fitted using Equation (2), which indicates the direction of the charge carrier hopping of one-dimensional intrachain diffusion. For temperatures of 25 K, 50 K, and 300 K, the dependence of HLF on λ 1 is in accordance with Equation (3), which indicates the direction of the charge carrier hopping of three-dimensional interchain diffusion. With light irradiation, the dependence of HLF on λ 1 for all temperatures can be fitted using Equation (3), which shows the direction of the charge carrier hopping of three-dimensional interchain diffusion. It was found that, at temperatures of 10 K and 15 K, without light irradiation, the charge carrier hopping mechanism was dominated by one-dimensional intrachain diffusion. However, with light irradiation, the charge carrier hopping mechanism completely changed to three-dimensional interchain diffusion, confirming that the additional energy of light irradiation affects the direction of charge carrier hopping. A similar tendency was observed for the HLF dependence of λ 2 with and without light irradiation at temperatures of 10 K, 15 K, 25 K, 50 K, and 300 K, as shown in Figure 5. Although the tendency was the same, the value of λ 2 was much smaller than λ 1 , therefore, for the present study, the fast component in the short time region of the depolarization rate ( λ 1 ) was analyzed in more detail, due to λ 1 providing more significant information than λ 2 .
After obtaining the information on the charge carrier hopping mechanism, the value of the diffusion rate can be calculated using Equations (6) and (7), as described in the methods section. The diffusion rates of the charge carrier in regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles at temperatures of 10 K, 15 K, 25 K, 50 K, and 300 K with and without light irradiation are presented in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.
In the case of μ+SR measurement without light irradiation, the parallel diffusion rate ranged from 1.39 × 10 15 to 0.09 × 10 15 rad/s. The parallel diffusion rate decreased with increasing temperature. The perpendicular diffusion rates were obtained starting from 25 K. It was found that the values increased with increasing temperatures. These results are consistent with our proposed model regarding the change in dimensionality obtained from the HLF dependence of λ 1 as described in Figure 4. When comparing the diffusion rate with that for regio-regular P3HT without ZnO nanoparticles, we found that the parallel diffusion rate in the present study was of the same order of magnitude, while the perpendicular diffusion rate was two orders of magnitude higher in the high-temperature range [32]. Moreover, compared with those of other conjugated polymers such as polyaniline (PANI), polypyridine, and polyphenylenevinylene (PPV), the parallel diffusion rates of regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles are higher by up to three orders of magnitude, and the perpendicular diffusion rates are slightly higher than those of PANI and PPV at high temperature [41,42]. The increase in the parallel and perpendicular diffusion rates indicates that the addition of ZnO nanoparticles facilitates the transfer of charge carriers due to the different bandgaps of P3HT and ZnO nanoparticles. The energy level (LUMO) of P3HT is −3.3 eV, while the conducting band of ZnO nanoparticles is −4.2 eV [28]. The low value of the conduction band of ZnO nanoparticles makes the diffusion process easier, resulting in high values for both parallel and perpendicular diffusion.
For μ+SR measurement with light irradiation, the values of both parallel and perpendicular diffusion were obtained for all temperatures starting from 10 K. At 10 K and 15 K, the perpendicular diffusion rates were 0.95 × 10 10 and 1.13 × 10 10 rad/s, respectively. These values were not observed in μ+SR measurement without light irradiation. The parallel diffusion decreased with increasing temperature, whereas the perpendicular diffusion rate increased with increasing temperature. The parallel diffusion rates ranged from 2.28 × 10 14 to 0.88 × 10 14 rad/s while the perpendicular diffusion rates ranged from 0.95 × 10 10 to 1.79 × 10 10 rad/s. When light irradiation was performed, the parallel diffusion rate was lower by one order of magnitude than the diffusion rate without light irradiation at 10 K and 15 K. Meanwhile, at 25 K to 300 K, the diffusion rate was of the same order of 10 14 , as shown in Figure 6. For μ+SR measurement with light irradiation, the perpendicular diffusion rate increased slightly with increasing temperature compared with that for μ+SR measurement without light irradiation. It is indicated that the additional energy from light irradiation affects the diffusion, especially the charge diffusion in the perpendicular direction.
To elucidate the dominance of the charge carrier hopping mechanism, the ratio of the parallel and perpendicular diffusion rates ( D / D ) was analyzed. Without light irradiation, the values of D / D at 25 K, 50 K, and 300 K were 1.70 × 10 4 , 1.28 × 10 4 , and 0.57 × 10 4 , respectively. With light irradiation, the values of D / D at 10 K, 15 K, 25 K, 50 K, and 300 K were 2.40 × 10 4 , 1.62 × 10 4 , 1.34 × 10 4 , 0.86 × 10 4 , and 0.49 × 10 4 , respectively, as shown in Table 1 and Table 2. It was found that the value of D / D had an order of 10 4 , corresponding to the domination of charge carrier interchain diffusion. The present result is also consistent with the results reported for the PANI:EB material, where the value of D / D was 2.5 × 10 4 at a temperature of 150 K for the interchain diffusion of polaron motion [43]. The analysis of the D in this study showed that the diffusion rate increased with increasing temperature. The tendency of D at temperatures above 300 K will follow an increasing trend as does D at temperatures of 10 to 300 K. Thus, the model proposed in this study is believed to be suitable for calculating the diffusion rate at temperatures above 300 K. The increase in D above 300 K correlated to an increase in solar cell efficiency, which will provide advantages for application in tropical countries where the average temperature is above 300 K.

4. Conclusions

The hopping mechanism and diffusion rate of regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles were studied to obtain D and D by μ+SR measurements with and without light irradiation. Without light irradiation, D decreased with increasing temperature, while D was observed starting from 25 K and increased with increasing temperature. On the other hand, with light irradiation, the D observed from 10 K indicated that the additional energy from light irradiation affected the diffusion, especially the charge diffusion in the perpendicular direction. The value of D / D for μ+SR measurement with and without light irradiation ranged from 2.40 × 10 4 to 0.49 × 10 4 and 1.70 × 10 4 to 0.57 × 10 4 , respectively. A smaller value of D / D indicates a higher domination of charge carrier interchain diffusion.
The diffusion calculation model reported in this paper is a model based on the fitting method with two exponentials. This approach is very powerful for obtaining the diffusion rate in the parallel and perpendicular directions. The diffusion rate can be confirmed by measuring the conductivity as a function of temperature. This model has many advantages and good future prospects. The main advantage of this model is that two parameters, namely the dimensionality and diffusion rate, are obtained simultaneously. To date, the results of μ+SR measurements for active solar cell materials, such as P3HT, P3HT/PCBM, and P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles, have only determined the dimensionality of the charge carrier mobility; therefore, the diffusion rate has not been obtained. The value of the diffusion rate is required when a material is to be used in applications, especially for solar cell devices. By using this model, not only the dimensionality, but also the diffusion rate, can be exactly calculated and obtained from HLF+SR measurements. Thus, researchers can use these two parameters in designing materials for applications, especially materials for producing high-efficiency solar cells. In addition, by using this model, we can also determine the diffusion rates for other materials such as poly(3-alkylthiophene) derivatives (poly(3-butylthiophene) and poly(3-octylthiophene)), which also have the potential to be used as active materials in solar cells. If the diffusion rates of other materials calculated using this model are higher than those of P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles, then these materials will become strong candidates for the active materials of solar cells.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.S., I.W. and R.R.; methodology, L.S. and N.R.; software, B.A.; validation, L.S., N.R. and R.R.; formal analysis, E.P., N.R., B.A. and S.W.; investigation, E.P., A.A., D.P.S. and I.W.; resources, A.A. and I.W.; data curation, L.S., D.P.S. and R.R.; writing—original draft preparation, E.P.; writing—review and editing, L.S., S.W., D.P.S. and R.R.; visualization, E.P.; supervision, L.S. and R.R.; project administration, I.W.; funding acquisition, R.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We would like to thank Kemenristek DIKTI for providing financial support with the World Class Research Grant No. 1207/UN6.3.1/PT.00/2021 and Padjadjaran University for providing support with the Academic Leadership Grant No. 1959/UN6.3.1/PT.00/2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kim, S.H.; Saeed, M.A.; Lee, S.Y.; Shim, J.W. Investigating the indoor performance of planar heterojunction based organic photovoltaics. IEEE J. Photov. 2021, 11, 997–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, R. Hybrid Organic/inorganic nanocomposites for photovoltaic cells. Materials 2014, 7, 2747–2771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yoshikawa, K.; Kawasaki, H.; Yoshida, W.; Irie, T.; Konishi, K.; Nakano, K.; Uto, T.; Adachi, D.; Kanematsu, M.; Uzu, H.; et al. Silicon heterojunction solar cell with interdigitated back contacts for a photoconversion efficiency over 26%. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, Y.; Firdaus, Y.; Isikgor, F.H.; Nugraha, M.I.; Yengel, E.; Harrison, G.T.; Hallani, R.; El Labban, A.; Faber, H.; Ma, C.; et al. Self-assembled monolayer enables hole transport layer-free organic solar cells with 18% efficiency and improved operational stability. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 2935–2944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Das, N.C.; Sokol, P.E. Hybrid photovoltaic devices from regioregular polythiophene and ZnO nanoparticles composites. Renew. Energy 2010, 35, 2683–2688. [Google Scholar]
  6. Quist, P.A.C.; Beek, W.J.E.; Wienk, M.M.; Janssen, R.A.J.; Savenije, T.J.; Siebbeles, L.D.A. Photogeneration and decay of charge carriers in hybrid bulk heterojunctions of ZnO nanoparticles and conjugated polymers. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 10315–10321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Citroni, R.; Di Paolo, F.; Livreri, P. Evaluation of an optical energy harvester for SHM application. Int. J. Electron. Commun. (AEÜ) 2019, 111, 152918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, Y.; Magomedov, A.; Firdaus, Y.; Kaltsas, D.; El-Labban, A.; Faber, H.; Naphade, D.R.; Yengel, E.; Zheng, X.; Yarali, E.; et al. 18.4% Organic solar cells using a high ionization energy self-assembled monolayer as hole-extraction interlayer. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 3569–3578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pattamang, P.; Jiramitmonkon, K.; Piyakulawat, P.; Asawapirom, U.; Tantisantisom, K.; Porntheeraphat, S.; Nukeaw, J.; Pratontep, S. Photoresponse of composites of zinc oxide and poly(3-hexythiophene) under selective uv and white-light illumination. Org. Electron. 2016, 39, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wright, M.; Uddin, A. Solar energy materials & solar cells organic—Inorganic hybrid solar cells: A comparative review. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2012, 107, 87–111. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee, Y.-H.; Yeh, P.-S.; Hsu, Y.-T.; Tong, Z.-H.; Chiang, C.-H. Effective control of solution self-assembly of P3HT/zinc salt complex for in situ template synthesis of P3HT/ZnO nanohybrids. Polymer 2021, 215, 123385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Motaung, D.E.; Makgwane, P.R.; Ray, S.S. Metal oxide nanostructures-containing organic polymer hybrid solar cells: Optimization of processing parameters on cell performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 355, 484–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Beek, W.J.E.; Wienk, M.M.; Janssen, R.A.J. Hybrid solar cells from regioregular polythiophene and ZnO nanoparticles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 1112–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Safriani, L.; Aprilia, A.; Bahtiar, A.; Risdiana; Kartawidjaja, M.; Apriani, T.; Kanazawa, K.; Furukawa, Y. Preparation of ZnO nanoparticles for blend of P3HT:ZnO Nanoparticles:PCBM thin film and its charge carrier dynamics characterization. AIP Conf. Proc. 2013, 1554, 101–104. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pan, J.; Chen, J.; Huang, Q.; Khan, Q.; Liu, X.; Tao, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Lei, W.; Nathan, A. Size tunable ZnO nanoparticles to enhance electron injection in solution processed QLEDs. ACS Photonics 2016, 3, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chapel, A.; Dkhil, S.B.; Therias, S.; Gardette, J.-L.; Hannani, D.; Poize, G.; Gaceur, M.; Shah, S.M.; Wong-Wah-Chung, P.; Videlot-Ackermann, C.; et al. Effect of ZnO nanoparticles on the photochemical and electronic stability of P3HT used in polymer solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2016, 155, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chin, Y.-M.; Lin, Y.-J.; Liu, D.-S. Enhancement of carrier mobility in poly(3-hexylthiophene) by incorporating ZnO nanoparticles. Thin Solid Films 2013, 548, 453–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, T.; Qiao, Q. Conjugated polymer–inorganic semiconductor hybrid solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 2700–2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Patidar, D.; Kaswan, A.; Saxena, N.S.; Sharma, K. Monodispersed ZnO nanoparticles and their use in heterojunction solar cell. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 260521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ebenhoch, B.; Thomson, S.A.J.; Genevicius, K.; Juška, G.; Samuel, I.D.W. Charge carrier mobility of the organic photovoltaic materials PTB7 and PC71BM and its influence on device performance. Org. Electron. 2015, 22, 62–68. [Google Scholar]
  21. Blundell, S.J. Spin-polarized muons in condensed matter physics. Contemp. Phys. 1999, 40, 175–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Pratt, F.L.; Blundell, S.J.; Jestädt, T.; Lovett, B.W.; Husmann, A.; Marshall, I.M.; Hayes, W.; Monkman, A.; Watanabe, I.; Nagamine, K.; et al. μSR of conducting and non-conducting polymers. Phys. B Condens. Matter. 2000, 289–290, 625–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ishida, K.; Nagamine, K.; Shirakawa, H. Muon spin rotation and relaxation studies of undoped and iodine-doped polyacetylene. Synth. Met. 1987, 17, 429–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pratt, F.L.; Valladares, R.M.; Pattenden, P.A.; Blundell, S.J.; Hayes, W.; Monkman, A.P.; Nagamine, K. μSR studies of spin excitations in poylaniline. Synth. Met. 1995, 69, 231–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pratt, F.L.; Hayes, W.; Mitchell, G.R.; Rossi, B.; Kiani, M.S.; Malhotra, B.D.; Pandey, S.S.; Milton, A.; Monkman, A.P. Muon studies of conducting polymers. Synth. Met. 1993, 55, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Risdiana; Fitrilawati; Siregar, R.E.; Hidayat, R.; Nugroho, A.A.; Tjia, M.O.; Ishii, Y.; Watanabe, I. Field and temperature dependence charge transport characteristic in regio-regular poly(3-octylthiophene-2, 5-diyl) studied by muon spin relaxation. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2010, 225, 012003. [Google Scholar]
  27. Safriani, L.; Risdiana; Fitrilawati; Bahtiar, A.; Aprilia, A.; Siregar, R.E.; Manawan, M.; Sari, D.P.; Angel, J.; Watanabe, I. μSR study with light irradiation of P3HT:ZnO nanoparticles as active material of hybrid solar cells. Mater. Sci. Forum 2019, 966, 404–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Safriani, L.; Risdiana; Fitrilawati; Manawan, M.; Bahtiar, A.; Aprilia, A.; Sari, D.P.; Angel, J.; Watanabe, I. Charge carrier transport in blend of P3HT and ZnO nanoparticles at low temperature studied by µSR. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1080, 012011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Safriani, L.; Risdiana; Bahtiar, A.; Aprilia, A.; Siregar, R.E.; Hidayat, R.; Saragi, T.P.I.; Kawasaki, I.; Watanabe, I. Charge carrier dynamics of active material solar cell P3HT:ZnO nanoparticles studied by muon spin relaxation (μSR). Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 896, 477–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Butler, M.A.; Walker, L.R.; Soos, Z.G. Dimensionality of spin fluctuations in highly anisotropic TCNQ salts. J. Chem. Phys. 1976, 64, 3592–3601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Riveli, N.; Adiperdana, B.; Safriani, L.; Suroto, B.J.; Noviyanti, A.R.; Mohammad, I.H.; Rahayu, I.; Manawan, M.; Saragi, T.; Risdiana. Study on the diffusion rate of the charge carrier transport in regio-random P3HT. Mater. Sci. Forum 2019, 966, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Riveli, N.; Risdiana. Study on the diffusion rate of the charge carrier transport in regio-random and regio-regular P3HT. Mater. Sci. Forum 2021, 1028, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mizoguchi, K. Spin dynamics study in conducting polymers by magnetic resonance. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1995, 34, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Meulenkamp, E.A. Synthesis and growth of ZnO nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 5566–5572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Risdiana; Fitrilawati; Hidayat, R.; Siregar, R.E.; Tjia, M.O.; Watanabe, I. µSR study of electron radical dynamics in regio-regular polythiophene. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2010, 200, 052024. [Google Scholar]
  36. Risdiana; Fitrilawati; Hidayat, R.; Siregar, R.E.; Tjia, M.O.; Watanabe, I. Intra- and inter-chain polaron diffusion in regio-random polythiophene studied by muon spin relaxation. Phys. B 2010, 405, S381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Risdiana; Adiperdana, B.; Safriani, L.; Bahtiar, A.; Fitrilawati; Siregar, R.E.; Hidayat, R.; Nugroho, A.A.; Tjia, M.O.; Watanabe, I. μSR study of charge carrier diffusion in regioregular poly (3-butylthiophene-2,5-Diyl). Phys. Procedia 2012, 30, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Safriani, L.; Risdiana; Bahtiar, A.; Aprilia, A.; Kawasaki, I.; Watanabe, I. µSR study of charge carrier motion in active layer P3HT:ZnO:PCBM hybrid solar cells. Mater. Sci. Forum 2015, 827, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bahtiar, A.; Safriani, L.; Aprilia, A.; Risdiana; Harsojo; Triwikantoro; Darminto; Nugroho, A.A.; Guo, H.; Kawasaki, I.; et al. Study of charge carrier dynamics of P3HT:PCBM blend for active material solar cell using muon spin relaxation. Mater. Sci. Forum 2015, 827, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pratt, F.L. Repolarization of anisotropic muonium in orientationally disordered solids. Phil. Mag. Lett. 1997, 75, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pratt, F.L.; Blundell, S.J.; Lovett, B.W.; Nagamine, K.; Ishida, K.; Hayes, W.; Jestadt, T.; Monkman, A.P. Anisotropic polaron motion in conducting polymers studied by muon spin relaxation. Synth. Met. 1999, 101, 323–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Blundell, S.J.; Pratt, F.L.; Marshall, I.M.; Husmann, A.; Hayes, W.; Martin, R.E.; Holmes, A.B. Muon-spin relaxation study of charge carrier dynamics in the conducting polymer PPV. Synth. Met. 2001, 119, 205–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pratt, F.L.; Ishida, K.; Nagamine, K.; Pattenden, P.A.; Jestadt, T.; Chow, K.H.; Blundel, S.J.; Hayes, W.; Monkman, A.P. Muon studies of spin dynamics in polyaniline. Synth. Met. 1997, 84, 943–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Two regions of longitudinal field HLF dependence of relaxation rate λ for high HLF and low HLF.
Figure 1. Two regions of longitudinal field HLF dependence of relaxation rate λ for high HLF and low HLF.
Energies 14 06730 g001
Figure 2. The asymmetry data for regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles for various applied longitudinal fields without light irradiation at temperatures of (a) 10 K, (b) 15 K, (c) 25 K, (d) 50 K, and (e) 300 K, and with light irradiation at temperatures of (f) 10 K, (g) 15 K, (h) 25 K, (i) 50 K, and (j) 300 K.
Figure 2. The asymmetry data for regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles for various applied longitudinal fields without light irradiation at temperatures of (a) 10 K, (b) 15 K, (c) 25 K, (d) 50 K, and (e) 300 K, and with light irradiation at temperatures of (f) 10 K, (g) 15 K, (h) 25 K, (i) 50 K, and (j) 300 K.
Energies 14 06730 g002
Figure 3. Different asymmetry data for regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles for 10 mT with () and without (▲) light irradiation at temperatures of (a) 15 K and (b) 25 K.
Figure 3. Different asymmetry data for regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles for 10 mT with () and without (▲) light irradiation at temperatures of (a) 15 K and (b) 25 K.
Energies 14 06730 g003
Figure 4. The longitudinal field dependence HLF of the relaxation rate λ 1 of the regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles without light irradiation at temperatures of (a) 10 K, (b) 15 K, (c) 25 K, (d) 50 K, and (e) 300 K and with light irradiation at temperatures of (f) 10 K, (g) 15 K, (h) 25 K, (i) 50 K, and (j) 300 K.
Figure 4. The longitudinal field dependence HLF of the relaxation rate λ 1 of the regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles without light irradiation at temperatures of (a) 10 K, (b) 15 K, (c) 25 K, (d) 50 K, and (e) 300 K and with light irradiation at temperatures of (f) 10 K, (g) 15 K, (h) 25 K, (i) 50 K, and (j) 300 K.
Energies 14 06730 g004
Figure 5. The longitudinal field dependence HLF of the relaxation rate λ 2 of the regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles without light irradiation at temperatures of (a) 10 K, (b) 15 K, (c) 25 K, (d) 50 K, and (e) 300 K and with light irradiation at temperatures of (f) 10 K, (g) 15 K, (h) 25 K, (i) 50 K, and (j) 300 K.
Figure 5. The longitudinal field dependence HLF of the relaxation rate λ 2 of the regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles without light irradiation at temperatures of (a) 10 K, (b) 15 K, (c) 25 K, (d) 50 K, and (e) 300 K and with light irradiation at temperatures of (f) 10 K, (g) 15 K, (h) 25 K, (i) 50 K, and (j) 300 K.
Energies 14 06730 g005
Figure 6. Temperature dependence of the diffusion rates in regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles: (a) parallel and (b) perpendicular.
Figure 6. Temperature dependence of the diffusion rates in regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles: (a) parallel and (b) perpendicular.
Energies 14 06730 g006
Table 1. The diffusion rates for regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles at several temperatures without light irradiation obtained in this study.
Table 1. The diffusion rates for regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles at several temperatures without light irradiation obtained in this study.
10 K15 K25 K50 K300 K
D (×1015 rad/s) 1.39 1.35 0.19 0.16 0.09
D (×1010 rad/s) 1.15 1.25 1.73
D / D (×104) 1.70 1.28 0.57
Table 2. The diffusion rates for regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles at several temperatures with light irradiation obtained in this study.
Table 2. The diffusion rates for regio-regular P3HT–ZnO nanoparticles at several temperatures with light irradiation obtained in this study.
10 K15 K25 K50 K300 K
D (×1014 rad/s) 2.28 1.83 1.61 1.19 0.88
D (×1010 rad/s) 0.95 1.13 1.20 1.38 1.79
D / D (×104) 2.40 1.62 1.34 0.86 0.49
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pratikna, E.; Safriani, L.; Riveli, N.; Adiperdana, B.; Winarsih, S.; Aprilia, A.; Sari, D.P.; Watanabe, I.; Risdiana, R. Effect of Light Irradiation on the Diffusion Rate of the Charge Carrier Hopping Mechanism in P3HT–ZnO Nanoparticles Studied by μ+SR. Energies 2021, 14, 6730. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206730

AMA Style

Pratikna E, Safriani L, Riveli N, Adiperdana B, Winarsih S, Aprilia A, Sari DP, Watanabe I, Risdiana R. Effect of Light Irradiation on the Diffusion Rate of the Charge Carrier Hopping Mechanism in P3HT–ZnO Nanoparticles Studied by μ+SR. Energies. 2021; 14(20):6730. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206730

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pratikna, Eka, Lusi Safriani, Nowo Riveli, Budi Adiperdana, Suci Winarsih, Annisa Aprilia, Dita Puspita Sari, Isao Watanabe, and Risdiana Risdiana. 2021. "Effect of Light Irradiation on the Diffusion Rate of the Charge Carrier Hopping Mechanism in P3HT–ZnO Nanoparticles Studied by μ+SR" Energies 14, no. 20: 6730. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206730

APA Style

Pratikna, E., Safriani, L., Riveli, N., Adiperdana, B., Winarsih, S., Aprilia, A., Sari, D. P., Watanabe, I., & Risdiana, R. (2021). Effect of Light Irradiation on the Diffusion Rate of the Charge Carrier Hopping Mechanism in P3HT–ZnO Nanoparticles Studied by μ+SR. Energies, 14(20), 6730. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206730

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop