Next Article in Journal
Past, Present, and Future of Critical Issues in Energy: Poverty, Transition and Security—A Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Multi-Fracture Propagation Considering Perforation Erosion with Respect to Multi-Stage Fracturing in Shale Reservoirs
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrogen Technologies: A Critical Review and Feasibility Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Application and Optimization of CCUS Technology in Shale Gas Production and Storage

1
Institute of New Energy and Low-Carbon Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource & Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(14), 5483; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16145483
Submission received: 11 July 2023 / Accepted: 18 July 2023 / Published: 19 July 2023
Global climate change is a crucial issue confronting the international community. The greenhouse effect caused by CO2 emissions is widely recognized as one of the key factors impacting climate change [1,2,3,4]. Reducing CO2 emissions and fully utilizing CO2 are important ways to protect the environment and achieve resource development. Carbon dioxide capture, utilization, and storage technology (CCUS) is an emerging technology with the potential to result in large-scale CO2 reduction; therefore, it has received widespread attention both domestically and internationally in the past decade. For example, the United States Department of Energy released the Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) Technology Research and Development Demonstration Roadmap in 2010, which laid out a development path for CCS and focused on efficient and economical solutions to quickly realize commercial applications. CCS technology needs to overcome various challenges at the economic, social, and technological levels, including the effective monitoring and verifying of CO2 storage processes and the viability of the permanent underground storage of CO2. The development of the Canadian CCS Technology Development Roadmap (CCSTRM) underwent four stages: situation analysis, confirmation of technology paths and R&D strategies, confirmation of priority directions for R&D and demonstration, and final writing. Japan’s CCS research is basically synchronized with European and North American countries. In Japan, CCS technology was implemented in 2020, and encompasses various applications such as enhancing oil recovery using CO2, sealing CO2 up to saltwater layers, injecting CO2 into depleted natural gas fields and coal seams, and developing CO2 transportation technology. The goal in China is to achieve peak CO2 emissions by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060 through stronger policies and measures. This further emphasizes the concept of “turning waste into wealth”, and emphasizes opportunities to improve the recovery rates of oil, natural gas, coalbed methane, and water using carbon dioxide (CO2-EOR, CO2-EGR, CO2-ECBM, and CO2-EWR, respectively) [5].
Natural gas resources in unconventional sedimentary reservoirs, such as shale and coal seams rich in kerogen, are abundant and environmentally friendly, making them one of the most important energy resources available [6,7,8,9,10,11]. CO2-enhanced shale gas production and underground storage integration technology are important ways to apply CCUS. Because of its characteristics of energy conservation, emission reduction, and efficient exploitation of shale gas, CCUS is emerging as an important future means for efficient shale gas exploitation and development [3,12,13]. At the same time, the stability of shale reservoirs is also a focus of research, directly determining the safety and efficiency of mining. The failure criterion that fully considers shale anisotropy and hydration is an important factor in evaluating the stability of shale formations [14]. The continuous exploitation and use of shallow shale gas is causing shale gas exploration and development to gradually move to deeper locations. These deeper environments have complex and changeable geological conditions, high temperatures, high ground stress, fluid seepage pressure, and other complex conditions [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. This makes innovations in applying CCUS technology during deep shale gas exploitation urgent. CCUS application in deep shale gas exploitation is now an important research direction.
Scholars have studied shale pore structure, shale gas recovery, shale reservoir stability, and shale gas movement and transmission in the application of CCUS in shale gas exploitation. For example, Wang et al. [22] analyzed the displacement mechanism of CH4 in nanoporous shale, its positive and negative effects on solid storage and organic matter extraction, the migration and expansion processes of elements, and the macro- and micro-control mechanisms for improving reservoir permeability. Feng et al. [23,24] studied the fracture trajectory of shale in the Longmaxi Formation after failure, and explored the mechanical properties of the shale under supercritical CO2 adsorption conditions. Asif et al. [25] measured the isotherms of two gases (CH4 and CO2) at pressures up to 8.4 MPa, and constructed an isotherm of CO2 to estimate the enhanced recovery rate of coalbed methane. Kong et al. [26] studied auxiliary additives to improve shale oil and gas production. Chen et al. [27] studied the creep characteristics of shale, considering the influence of bedding direction and water content.
The application of CCUS in shale gas production and storage involves many aspects, including in-depth research on its mechanisms and key technologies. This includes the competitive adsorption mechanism of CO2/CH4 in shale, SC-CO2 displacement and the displacement of shale gas, the SC-CO2 storage mechanism, SC-CO2 jet technology, SC-CO2 fracturing technology, the CO2 displacement of shale gas, and SC-CO2 storage technology. These issues need to be analyzed and solved from the perspectives of technology, security, investment, environment, and ecology. Therefore, we have organized this Special Issue of Energy, titled “Application and Optimization of CCUS Technology in Shale Gas Production and Storage”. This Special Issue welcomes contributions of all achievements regarding CCUS technology related to shale gas, including all outlines from laboratory experiments, numerical simulations, engineering evaluations, and economic judgement.

Author Contributions

J.L, G.F. and P.Z. contributed equally to the design, implementation, conceptualization, and the delivery of the Special Issue; writing—original draft preparation, G.F.; writing—review and editing, J.L. and G.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52104143), the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province, China (Grant No. 2022NSFSC0193), and the Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining (Grant No. GJNY-21-41-01), which are greatly appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gilliland, E.S.; Ripepi, N.; Conrad, M.; Miller, M.J.; Karmis, M. Selection of monitoring techniques for a carbon storage and enhanced coalbed methane recovery pilot test in the Central Appalachian Basin. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2013, 118, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kelemen, P.; Benson, S.M.; Pilorgé, H.; Psarras, P.; Wilcox, J. An Overview of the Status and challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations. Front. Clim. 2019, 1, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Liu, J.; Yao, Y.; Liu, D.; Elsworth, D. Experimental evaluation of CO2 enhanced recovery of adsorbed-gas from shale. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2017, 179, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shi, F.; Deng, B.; Yin, G.; Zhang, D.; Li, M.; Liu, P.; Liu, C. Kinetic behavior of heterogeneous sorption deformation on coal: Effect of maceral/micro-lithotype distribution. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2019, 216, 103324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jiang, K.; Ashworth, P. The development of Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) research in China: A bibliometric perspective. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2021, 138, 110521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kang, J.; Wan, R.; Zhou, F.; Liu, Y.; Li, Z.; Yin, Y. Effects of supercritical CO2 extraction on adsorption characteristics of methane on different types of coals. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 388, 123449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, L.; Ning, Z.; Wang, Q.; Qi, R.; Cheng, Z.; Wu, X.; Zhang, W.; Qin, H. Molecular Insights into Kerogen Deformation Induced by CO2/CH4 Sorption: Effect of Maturity and Moisture. Energy Fuel 2019, 33, 4792–4805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Rahman, S.S. Simulation of Adsorption–Desorption Behavior in Coal Seam Gas Reservoirs at the Molecular Level: A Comprehensive Review. Energy Fuel 2020, 34, 2619–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meng, M.; Qiu, Z.; Zhong, R.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Chen, P. Adsorption characteristics of supercritical CO2/CH4 on different types of coal and a machine learning approach. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 368, 847–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mohanty, M.M.; Pal, B.K. Sorption behavior of coal for implication in coal bed methane an overview. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2017, 27, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, J.; Sun, C.J.E. Molecular insights on competitive adsorption and enhanced displacement effects of CO2/CH4 in coal for low-carbon energy technologies. Energy 2022, 261, 125176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cheng, L.; Li, D.; Wang, W.; Liu, J. Heterogeneous Transport of Free CH4 and Free CO2 in Dual-Porosity Media Controlled by Anisotropic In Situ Stress during Shale Gas Production by CO2 Flooding: Implications for CO2 Geological Storage and Utilization. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 26756–26765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, J.; Xie, L.; Elsworth, D.; Gan, Q. CO2/CH4 Competitive Adsorption in Shale: Implications for Enhancement in Gas Production and Reduction in Carbon Emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 9328–9336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, Q.; Yao, B.; Fan, X.; Li, Y.; Fantuzzi, N.; Ma, T.; Chen, Y.; Zeng, F.; Li, X.; Wang, L. A failure criterion for shale considering the anisotropy and hydration based on the shear slide failure model. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2023, 33, 447–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Feng, G.; Wang, X.; Kang, Y.; Zhang, Z. Effect of thermal cycling-dependent cracks on physical and mechanical properties of granite for enhanced geothermal system. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2020, 134, 104476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, A.; Xie, H.; Zhang, R.; Ren, L.; Zhou, J.; Gao, M.; Tan, Q. Dynamic failure behavior of Jinping marble under various preloading conditions corresponding to different depths. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. 2021, 148, 104959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, J.; Xie, H.; Gao, M.; Li, C.; Sun, Q. Damage mechanism and heat transfer characteristics of limestone after thermal shock cycle treatments based on geothermal development. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. 2022, 160, 105269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Feng, G.; Wang, X.; Wang, M.; Kang, Y. Experimental investigation of thermal cycling on fracture characteristics of granite in a geothermal-energy reservoir. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2020, 235, 107180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, C.; Feng, G.; Xie, H.; Wang, J.; Duan, Z.; Tao, Y.; Lu, G.; Xu, H.; Hu, Y.; Li, C.; et al. Study on the accuracy of fracture criteria in predicting fracture characteristics of granite with different occurrence depths. Energies 2022, 15, 9248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Feng, G.; Zhu, C.; Wang, X.; Tang, S. Thermal effects on prediction accuracy of dense granite mechanical behaviors using modified maximum tangential stress criterion. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2023, 15, 1734–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jin, P.; Hu, Y.; Shao, J.; Zhao, G.; Zhu, X.; Li, C. Influence of different thermal cycling treatments on the physical, mechanical and transport properties of granite. Geothermics 2019, 78, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, M.; Huang, K.; Xie, W.; Dai, X. Current research into the use of supercritical CO2 technology in shale gas exploitation. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2019, 29, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Feng, G.; Kang, Y.; Wang, X.; Hu, Y.; Li, X. Investigation on The Failure Characteristics and Fracture Classification of Shale Under Brazilian Test Conditions. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2020, 53, 3325–3340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Feng, G.; Kang, Y.; Sun, Z.-D.; Wang, X.-C.; Hu, Y.-Q. Effects of supercritical CO2 adsorption on the mechanical characteristics and failure mechanisms of shale. Energy 2019, 173, 870–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Asif, M.; Panigrahi, D.; Naveen, P.; Ojha, K. Construction of high-pressure adsorption isotherm: A tool for predicting coalbed methane recovery from Jharia coalfield, India. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2019, 29, 765–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kong, S.; Feng, G.; Liu, Y.; Li, K. Potential of dimethyl ether as an additive in CO2 for shale oil recovery. Fuel 2021, 296, 120643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, Y.; Hao, X.; Teng, J.; Wen, Z. Creep behavior of water-containing bedded shale. J. Cent. South. Univ. 2023, 30, 975–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, J.; Feng, G.; Zhao, P. Application and Optimization of CCUS Technology in Shale Gas Production and Storage. Energies 2023, 16, 5483. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16145483

AMA Style

Liu J, Feng G, Zhao P. Application and Optimization of CCUS Technology in Shale Gas Production and Storage. Energies. 2023; 16(14):5483. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16145483

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Jun, Gan Feng, and Peng Zhao. 2023. "Application and Optimization of CCUS Technology in Shale Gas Production and Storage" Energies 16, no. 14: 5483. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16145483

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop