Next Article in Journal
Multi-Angle Reliability Evaluation of Grid-Connected Wind Farms with Energy Storage Based on Latin Hypercube Important Sampling
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigating the Performance of Efficient and Stable Planer Perovskite Solar Cell with an Effective Inorganic Carrier Transport Layer Using SCAPS-1D Simulation
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Microgrid Stability and Energy Management: Techniques, Challenges, and Future Directions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stability and Performance Enhancement of Perovskite Solar Cells: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation of CsPbBr3 Perovskite Solar Cells Using a Green Solvent

1
School of Science, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
2
School of Integrated Circuits and Electronics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Energies 2023, 16(18), 6426; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186426
Submission received: 23 July 2023 / Revised: 25 August 2023 / Accepted: 4 September 2023 / Published: 5 September 2023

Abstract

:
An increasing number of researchers are interested in studying CsPbBr3 perovskite solar cells (PSCs) due to their high stability. However, the use of methanol during the spin-coating process is extremely hazardous, both to humans and the environment. CsBr is very soluble in water, but owing to its high specific heat capacity, water causes uneven crystallization and the creation of pores, which negatively impact the performance of CsPbBr3 devices. In this paper, water is introduced as the solvent for CsBr in place of methanol to prepare CsPbBr3 films and ethanol is used as the surface treatment solvent. The morphology and crystal quality of CsPbBr3 films are improved by varying the concentration and spin-coating cycles of the CsBr/H2O solution and adding ethanol post-treatment. The results show that high-quality CsPbBr3 films with reduced grain boundaries and high phase-purity were obtained by spin-coating 100 mg/mL CsBr/H2O solution three times and using ethanol as a post-treatment. The CsPbBr3 solar cells yielded a maximum efficiency of 7.65% and demonstrate long-term stability over 1100 h.

1. Introduction

Perovskite materials show superior photovoltaic properties, including long exciton diffusion length, and controllable band gap [1,2,3,4,5]. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) significantly increased to 25.7% since perovskite materials were introduced in 2009 to prepare solar cells [6]. In contrast to conventional silicon-based solar cells, PSCs are cheaper and easier to manufacture. These benefits increase the potential of PSCs [7,8,9]. PSCs can be divided into all-inorganic perovskite solar cells and organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite solar cells. Although organic–inorganic hybrid PSCs exhibit excellent PCE, their commercial development is hampered by poor humidity and temperature stability [10].
In contrast to organic–inorganic hybrid PSCs, CsPbX3 all-inorganic PSCs using the inorganic metal cation Cs+ instead of the A position organic cation group have received more attention due to the better humidity and temperature stability [11,12]. The efficiency of CsPbI3 PSCs was almost the same as that of organic–inorganic hybrid PSCs [13]. However, CsPbI3 crystals will rapidly convert from α-phase to δ-phase and lose their photovoltaic capacity when exposed to ambient temperature [14,15]. In order to make CsPbI3 crystals more stable and prevent phase transitions, Br element was integrated into the CsPbI3 film to prepare CsPbI2Br PSCs. CsPbI2Br solar cells have a maximum efficiency of 17.46%, but their stability is still low [16]. CsPbBr3 PSCs have better humidity and thermal stability compared with CsPbI3 and CsPbI2Br PSCs, and they maintain their original PCE of over 800 h after being exposed to the air [17]. Moreover, CsPbBr3 PSCs can theoretically produce an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of above 2.0 V owing to its large band gap. A high Voc enables CsPbBr3 cells to be used in stacked solar cell modules and increases the potential applications.
In general, it is difficult to fabricate CsPbBr3 film via the traditional one-step spin-coating method because of the significant difference in solubility between PbBr2 and CsBr in a frequently used solvent [18]. At present, most CsPbBr3 films are prepared using the multi-step spin-coating method. In the multi-step spin-coating method, 1 M PbBr2/DMF solution is firstly deposited on the substrate to form a PbBr2 film, followed by spin-coating of 0.07 M CsBr/methanol solution on the deposited PbBr2 film multiple times owing to the low solubility of CsBr in methanol to form orange-phase CsPbBr3 film [19]. The multi-step spin-coating is able to regulate the degree of reaction between PbBr2 and CsBr and create high phase-purity CsPbBr3 films [20,21,22]. In contrast, the multi-step spin-coating method is laborious and time-consuming. Furthermore, the excessive use of methanol is harmful to the environment and has a large negative impact on researchers’ ideas, which greatly affects the sustainable development of CsPbBr3 PSCs. Therefore, it is highly essential to exploit a facile solution treatment strategy to prepare high-quality CsPbBr3 films with as few toxic solvents as possible.
Water can effectively dissolve CsBr but can only poorly dissolve PbBr2. Based on the enormous solubility of CsBr in water, Wan’s group adopted the CsBr methanol/H2O solution (methanol:H2O = 5:1) and isopropanol-assisted post-treatment to prepare CsPbBr3 PSCs via a two-step spin-coating method [23]. This significantly reduced the use of methanol, but did not remove it. The CsBr methanol/H2O solution is still toxic. Wei’s group used water as the solvent of CsBr to fabricate CsPbBr3 PSCs at an efficiency of 6.12%, making it possible to use the two-step spin-coating method to prepare CsPbBr3 PSCs without using methanol [24]. However, there are several disadvantages to utilizing water as the solvent of CsBr. First, the CsBr/H2O solution is unable to propagate uniformly on the PbBr2 film due to the poor wettability of PbBr2 film and water can dissolve the CsPbBr3 film, resulting in a low PCE compared with the traditional preparation method with methanol. Second, the high specific heat capacity of water causes a slow volatilization rate, which is adverse to the generation of the CsPbBr3 phase. Finally, the high solubility of CsBr in water can lead to an excess of CsBr, which results in the deposition of residual CsBr crystals on the surface of the CsPbBr3 films, which is adverse to the performance of CsPbBr3 solar cells [25].
It is well known that ethanol evaporates very quickly and has a very low solubility for CsPbBr3. We chose ethanol as the post-treatment solvent because it can not only facilitate CsPbBr3 crystal recrystallization to increase the crystallinity of the CsPbBr3 film but can also remove excess CsBr from the deposited film. The results show that the high-quality CsPbBr3 films with reduced grain boundaries and high phase-purity are obtained by spin-coating 100 mg/mL CsBr/H2O solution for three times and using ethanol as a post-treatment. The CsPbBr3 solar cells prepared in this way yielded a highest efficiency of 7.65% and demonstrated long-term stability over 1100 h. This study provides a green and effective method to prepare high-efficiency CsPbBr3 PSCs, which is conducive to the sustainable development of CsPbBr3 PSCs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The laser-patterned FTO (TEC-A7) was purchased from Advanced Election Technology Co., Ltd (Liaoning, China). The carbon paste was supplied by Shanghai MaterWin New Materials Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Ethanol (>99.5%), titanium tetrachloride, titanium (Ⅳ) isopropoxide, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, >99.8%), and titanium dioxide paste (Dyesol-30-NR-D) were procured from Aladdin. Polymer Light Technology Corp (Xi’an, China) supplied lead (Ⅱ) bromide (PbBr2, >99.99%) and cesium bromide (CsBr, >99.9%). All chemical reagents were used without further purification.

2.2. Device Fabrication

The FTO substrates were cleaned in ethanol, DI water, and isopropanol by an ultrasonic cleaner. Further, the substrates were treated by a plasma cleaner with a power of 40 W for 5 min. To make the compact TiO2 (C-TiO2) solution, 40 μL titanium (IV) isopropoxide and 8 μL hydrochloric acid were combined in 1 mL ethanol and stirred for 30 min. Mesoporous TiO2 (mp-TiO2) precursor solution was acquired by mixing TiO2 paste with ethanol (weight ratio = 1:5) and stirred for 6 h.
The C-TiO2 layers were deposited on the FTO substrates via spin-coating 100 μL C-TiO2 solution at 3000 rpm for 30 s (repeat twice, then anneal each time for 15 min at 150 °C). The C-TiO2 layers were then annealed at 500 °C for 30 min. Following a period of equilibration, the mp-TiO2 layers were deposited via spin-coating 100 μL mp-TiO2 solution at 5000 rpm for 30 s. After drying at 80 °C for 40 min, the mp-TiO2 layers were sintered at 500 °C for 30 min. The films were then immersed in TiCl4 aqueous solution for 30 min at 70 °C and annealed at 500 °C for 30 min.
After that, the perovskite films were prepared as follows: First, 1 M PbBr2/DMF solution was spin-coated onto the mp-TiO2 layer at 2000 rpm for 30 s and annealed at 90 °C for 30 min. Before spin-coating the CsBr aqueous solution, the substrates were heated at 80 °C on a hot plate and the CsBr aqueous solution with concentrations of 50, 100, 150, and 200 mg/mL was stirred evenly in the 80 °C oil bath. Then, 100 μL CsBr aqueous solutions of different concentrations was spin-coated on the PbBr2 films and annealed at 250 °C for 5 min. CsPbBr3 films were fabricated by repeating the process 1–3 times, depending on the color of the film. Next, the CsPbBr3 film was rinsed in ethanol for 15 s and annealed on a hotplate at 250 °C for 5 min. Finally, the conductive carbon paste and mask were utilized to scrape carbon electrodes with an area of 0.1 cm2. All processes were carried out in air. For brevity, the CsPbBr3 perovskite films prepared from the CsBr aqueous solution with concentrations of 50 mg/mL, 100 mg/mL, 150 mg/mL, and 200 mg/mL are denoted as “50”, “100”, “150”, and “200”, respectively. The CsPbBr3 film prepared by spin-coating the 100 mg/mL CsBr aqueous solution three times is denoted as “Control”, and the CsPbBr3 film post-treated by ethanol is denoted as “post-treatment”.

2.3. Characterization

The scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) was used to characterize the morphology of CsPbBr3 films. The X-ray diffraction (XRD, Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5404 Å)) and UV-vis NIR (Cary 5000 UV–vis spectrophotometer, Agilent, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia) were used to examine the crystal quality and absorbance properties of CsPbBr3 perovskite films. The Nano LOG-TCSPC was used to measure the steady-state photoluminescence spectra (PL). The Keithley 2400 machine with a solar simulator (Zolixss 150, Zolix, Beijing, China) under AM 1.5 G, 100 mW cm−2 illumination was used to measure the photocurrent–voltage (J-V) curves, space-charge limited current (SCLC), dark J-V curves, steady-state short-circuit current density (Jsc), and PCE. An oscilloscope (Tektronix, Beaverton, OR, USA, MDO 3052) was used to measure the transient Voc spectra. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out in the dark using the electrochemical workstation (IVIUM TECHNOLOGIES, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) with a an amplitude of 0.8 V in the range of 100 kHz–1 Hz.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the SEM images of CsPbBr3 film collected to help understand the effect of different CsBr concentrations and ethanol post-treatment on the film morphology. The number of spin-coating processes of the CsBr aqueous solution was only one. The CsPbBr3 film prepared with the 100 mg/mL CsBr aqueous solution presents the maximum coverage rate and the best surface morphology, as shown in Figure 1. The average grain size of the CsPbBr3 crystal is 0.88 μm with 100 mg/mL CsBr/H2O solution and 0.60 μm with 150 mg/mL CsBr/H2O solution. The grain size of the CsPbBr3 crystal prepared by CsBr aqueous solution with concentrations of 50 mg/mL and 200 mg/mL could not easily be calculated.
The SEM images of CsPbBr3 films with and without ethanol post-treatment in Figure 1b indicate that ethanol post-treatment resulted in fewer grain boundaries due to the recrystallization of the grains. Besides, as shown in Figure 1a, the SEM images of the CsPbBr3 film prepared with the 50 mg/mL CsBr aqueous solution show a low coverage rate and large voids, which should significantly reduce the photovoltaic performance of CsPbBr3 devices. The SEM images of the CsPbBr3 film prepared with 150 mg/mL solution show a few CsBr crystal particles at the grain boundaries after the ethanol post-treatment, as shown in Figure 1(c-3,c-4), which are distinguishable from needle-like PbBr2 crystals. It is speculated that the excess of CsBr leads to the formation of Cs4PbBr6, and that the excess of CsBr is separated from the Cs4PbBr6 crystal by ethanol post-treatment and precipitated at the grain boundary. It is proved in the following XRD patterns. The SEM images of the CsPbBr3 film prepared with 200 mg/mL CsBr solution present huge perovskite grains with a low coverage rate. Besides, more CsBr grains appeared after ethanol post-treatment as shown in Figure 1d. The high concentration of CsBr aqueous solution leads to the formation of CsBr-rich crystals (Cs4PbBr6), and the ethanol post-treatment promotes the recrystallization of CsPbBr3 films and the precipitation of CsBr.
XRD was performed to study the impact of the concentration of CsBr solution, spin-coating cycles, and ethanol post-treatment on the crystal quality of CsPbBr3 films. Figure 2a–d show XRD results of CsPbBr3 films prepared with different concentrations of CsBr solution and spin-coating cycles. After spin-coating once with a low concentration of CsBr solution, the CsPbBr3 film with an excess of the CsPb2Br5 phase was formed, which gradually converted into the CsPbBr3 phase when the number of spin-coating cycles was increased. High-purity CsPbBr3 film can be prepared by spin-coating only once time when a high concentration of CsBr solution was used. As the number of spin-coating cycles of CsBr solution increased, the CsPbBr3 film gradually transformed into the Cs4PbBr6 phase. This is consistent with the mechanism of the generation of the CsPbBr3 phase.
When the concentration of CsBr solution was set to 100 mg/mL, the XRD patterns of the CsPbBr3 films prepared with a different number of spin-coating cycles of CsBr solution and ethanol post-treatment are shown in Figure 3a,b. As shown in Figure 3a, the CsPb2Br5 phase gradually changes into the CsPbBr3 phase with an increase in the number of spin-coating cycles, indicating that the CsPbBr3 film changes from a PbBr2-rich phase to a CsPbBr3 phase. Furthermore, when spin-coating 100 mg/mL CsBr solution three times, the crystal quality of the CsPbBr3 film has been significantly improved after ethanol post-treatment, as proved by the higher peak strength and narrower half-height width, as shown in Figure 3b.
The UV-vis absorption spectra of the CsPbBr3 films after spin-coating 100 mg/mL CsBr solution three times were evaluated to determine the light absorption capability, as shown in Figure 3c.
Compared to the CsPbBr3 film without ethanol post-treatment, a slight increase in absorbance was observed after the ethanol post-treatment, which is attributed to the increased phase purity of the CsPbBr3 film. After measuring the cut-off position of the absorption spectrum, the band gap of the two films does not change. At the same time, it can be judged that the band gap of the CsPbBr3 film has not changed after the ethanol post-treatment from the position of dotted lines in the figure, which also proves that ethanol post-treatment does not change the composition of the CsPbBr3 film. The position of the dotted line extending to the x-axis is at approximately 523 nm, corresponding to an optical band gap of 2.37 eV, which is consistent with the previous literature [26].
In addition, the steady-state photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the CsPbBr3 films with and without ethanol post-treatment were also tested, as shown in Figure 3d. For the steady-state PL test, the CsPbBr3 films were directly deposited on the FTO substrate without deposition of the carrier transport layer. A higher PL strength means that there are fewer defects. The steady-state PL spectra showed that the CsPbBr3 film with ethanol post-treatment has higher PL strength, indicating that the film has lower defect density, which is attributed to the reduced grain boundary and improved crystal quality after the ethanol post-treatment. In addition, the enhanced PL peak in the ethanol post-treated film also proves that the phase purity of CsPbBr3 is improved, in accordance with the earlier XRD results. The positions of PL peaks remain immobile after ethanol post-treatment, implying that the composition of the CsPbBr3 film was not changed after ethanol post-treatment.
Solar cell devices with a structure of FTO/C-TiO2/mp-TiO2/CsPbBr3/Carbon have been fabricated based on CsPbBr3 perovskite film prepared by spin-coating 100 mg/mL CsBr solution three times. The voltammetric characteristics of the devices were compared without and with ethanol post-treatment. The test was carried out with a voltage range of [1.5 V, −0.5 V]. As shown in Figure 4b, after ethanol post-treatment, the PCE of the perovskite solar cell was obviously improved. The performance improvement is mainly reflected in the Jsc, which indicates that the ethanol post-treated film has less charge loss. This is due to the reduced grain boundary and improved crystal quality, as stated earlier.
It has been reported that the density of defect states at the surface and interface of perovskite films will lead to a slow optical response [27] as seen in the transient Voc measurement under light/dark cycling in Figure 4c. Noticeably, the response of untreated devices was slower than that of ethanol post-treated devices. The first dark/light transition shows that the Voc of the post-treated device reaches a steady-state maximum in less than 1 s, while the untreated device takes more than 3 s for the Voc to reach steady-state. Results of the transient Voc measurement demonstrate that the ethanol post-treatment reduces the defect density in the CsPbBr3 film. Figure 4d shows the results of the forward and reverse scanning J-V curves. It can be observed from the J-V curves that the hysteresis of the optimized devices with ethanol post-treatment is relatively small.
To understand the mechanism by which the ethanol post-treatment influences the performance of the CsPbBr3 solar cell, we conducted SCLC measurements of the optimized device with an FTO/CsPbBr3/Ag structure [28]. Figure 5a shows the SCLC curves measured in a dark environment. The voltage of the trap filling limit (VTFL) can be obtained from the SCLC curve, and the Ntrap can be calculated according to below Equation (1) [5]:
N trap = 2 ε r ε 0 V TFL / q L 2
where q is the electron charge, ε0 and εr are the vacuum permittivity and relative permittivity (εr = 22), and L is the thickness of the perovskite film (Control: L = 431 nm post-treatment: L = 460 nm). According to the SCLC curves in Figure 5a, the VTFL of untreated and ethanol post-treated CsPbBr3 films is 0.5070 and 0.3014 V, and the calculated Ntrap is 6.463 × 1015 cm−3 and 3.468 × 1015 cm−3, respectively. Obviously, the Ntrap value in the ethanol post-treated CsPbBr3 film was much lower than that in the untreated CsPbBr3 film. It can be concluded that ethanol post-treatment can effectively reduce defects and traps in the CsPbBr3 film. Figure 5b shows the J-V curves in a dark environment. The dark J-V curve can be divided into three parts. The leftmost low-voltage area is the first part (I area) and the dark current density value can be read directly in this area when the voltage is 0 V. The dark current density value is used to characterize the leakage current of the device. As shown in Figure 5b, the dark current density of the ethanol post-treated PSC was about two orders of magnitude lower than that of the untreated device, implying that the ethanol post-treated PSCs can reduce charge carrier recombination losses.
The second part (II area) is an exponential function, in which the slope is the reciprocal of the series resistance (Rs) of the device. The lower Rs indicates the higher the Jsc of the device. We can see from Figure 5b that the device exhibits an increased slope and decreased Rs after ethanol post-treatment, indicating that the ethanol post-treatment improves the interface contact of the device. The height of the third part (III area) is related to the shunt resistance (Rshunt) of the device. The higher shunt resistance means the lower Voc loss of the device [29]. The value of Voc can be calculated by Formula (2) [30]:
V oc = n k B T q ln J sc J 0
where kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is thermodynamic temperature, q is the elementary charge, Jsc is the short-circuit current, and J0 is the longitudinal intercept of the fitting line in the second part. According to the calculation, the Voc of the ethanol post-treated device is higher than that of the untreated device. Based on the discussion above, it can be concluded that the improvement in the photovoltaic performance of the device with ethanol post-treatment is due to the reduced defects and carrier recombination losses in the CsPbBr3 film, as well as the enhanced interface contact of the device.
To investigate the recombination of carriers, the EIS of the devices prepared with and without ethanol post-treatment was measured under a dark environment with a 0.8 V bias voltage. The corresponding Nyquist plot is shown in Figure 5c. Obviously, the Rs value of the control PSC is approximately equivalent to the Rs value of the ethanol post-treatment PSC owing to the identical device architecture. Based on the Nyquist plot, the Rrec increases from 18.615 kΩ (for the untreated device) to 23.908 kΩ (for the ethanol post-treated device), implying the suppressed recombination after ethanol post-treatment.
A maximum power point steady-state output test was performed on the devices prepared with and without ethanol post-treatment to evaluate the device’s reliability and stability, as illustrated in Figure 5d. We can see that the steady-state output current density is increased from 5.96 mA cm−2 to 6.47 mA cm−2 after the introduction of ethanol post-treatment. Both devices show excellent stability and maintain approximately the same Jsc for over 200 s, demonstrating the excellent stability of our CsPbBr3 PSCs.
To clarify the mechanism of carrier transport and recombination in the devices prepared with and without post-treatment, Jsc and Voc dependence on the light intensity have been measured, and the corresponding results are shown in Figure 6a,b, respectively. The results can be analyzed with Equation (3) [31]:
J sc I α
where I is the light intensity and α is the slope. As shown in Figure 6a, Jsc is on the y-axis and light intensity is on the x-axis. Taking the logarithm of the transverse and longitudinal axes and the slope is the α. The α value for the device prepared with ethanol post-treatment is 0.97119, while it is 0.96580 for the untreated device. By comparison, the α value of the ethanol post-treated device is closer to 1, indicating that the device has more efficient charge separation ability and less bimolecular recombination.
In addition, photovoltage attenuation tests were performed, as shown in Figure 6b. The Voc dependence light intensity conforms to Equation (4) [32]:
V oc n k B T q log 10 I
where I is the light intensity, n is the ideal factor, kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is the thermodynamic temperature, and q is the elementary charge. In a diode, voltage and current are exponentially related and the ideal factor n modifies this relationship, which is the combination of all the factors that cause the device to deviate from the ideal state. In perovskite solar cell devices, the ideal factor n is usually determined by defect recombination.
The closer the ideal factor n gets to 2, the more defect-related recombination in the device. Conversely, the closer the ideal factor n gets to 1, the less defect-related recombination in the device. As shown in Figure 6b, with Voc on the y-axis and light intensity on the x-axis, the logarithm of the abscissa and the n value can be calculated from the slope of the curve. The calculated n of the device with ethanol post-treatment is 1.5085 and that of the untreated device is 1.8854, implying that the defect-related recombination is reduced dramatically by ethanol post-treatment. This is attributed to the reduced grain boundary and improved crystal quality after ethanol post-treatment, as stated earlier.
To confirm the reliability of our results, we fabricated 30 CsPbBr3 solar cell devices for each group. As shown in Figure 6c, the PCE of each device is presented by a bar chart and Gaussian fitting curves. It can be seen that the efficiency distribution curve of the ethanol post-treated devices is much narrower than that of the untreated devices, demonstrating the improved repeatability of the devices with ethanol post-treatment.
Finally, the long-term stability based on the devices prepared with and without post-treatment was evaluated. The devices stored in ambient air (temperature ~25 °C, relative humidity ~40%) without encapsulation, and the corresponding results, are shown in Figure 6d. It can be seen that the device with ethanol post-treatment presents much better long-term stability than the untreated device and maintains 75% of its primary efficiency after storage in a dark atmosphere environment for 1100 h. It is attributed to the passivated defect states. Thus, the high-quality perovskite film prepared with ethanol post-treatment had reduced grain boundaries and improved crystal quality, which also improves the stability of the final device.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we used water as the solvent for CsBr to prepare CsPbBr3 film instead of methanol. The morphology and crystal quality of CsPbBr3 films were improved dramatically by optimizing the process parameters (concentration and number of spin-coating cycles of the CsBr/H2O solution) and adding an ethanol post-treatment. It was found that high-quality CsPbBr3 films with reduced grain boundaries and improved phase purity were obtained by spin-coating 100 mg/mL CsBr/H2O solution three times. After ethanol post-treatment, the CsPbBr3 film was recrystallized and ethanol was used to remove excess CsBr from the deposited film. The CsPbBr3 solar cells made by this way yielded a highest efficiency of 7.65% and demonstrated long-term stability over 1100 h.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.; methodology, J.Y.; software, J.X.; validation, J.C. and J.W.; formal analysis, J.W.; investigation, J.C.; resources, J.D.; data curation, Y.J.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C. and J.Y.; writing—review and editing, J.D.; visualization, H.L.; supervision, H.H.; project administration, J.D.; funding acquisition, J.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stranks, S.D.; Eperon, G.E.; Grancini, G.; Menelaou, C.; Alcocer, M.J.; Leijtens, T.; Herz, L.M.; Petrozza, A.; Snaith, H.J. Electron-hole diffusion lengths exceeding 1 micrometer in an organometal trihalide perovskite absorber. Science 2013, 342, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhu, W.; Kang, L.; Yu, T.; Lv, B.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Zou, Z. Facile face-down annealing triggered remarkable texture development in CH3NH3PbI3 films for high-performance perovskite solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 6104–6113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Motti, S.G.; Meggiolaro, D.; Barker, A.J.; Mosconi, E.; Perini, C.A.R.; Ball, J.M.; Gandini, M.; Kim, M.; De Angelis, F.; Petrozza, A. Controlling competing photochemical reactions stabilizes perovskite solar cells. Nat. Photonics 2019, 13, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Srimath Kandada, A.R.; Petrozza, A. Photophysics of hybrid lead halide perovskites: The role of microstructure. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 536–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Buin, A.; Pietsch, P.; Xu, J.; Voznyy, O.; Ip, A.H.; Comin, R.; Sargent, E.H. Materials processing routes to trap-free halide perovskites. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6281–6286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, M.; Jeong, J.; Lu, H.; Lee, T.K.; Eickemeyer, F.T.; Liu, Y.; Choi, I.W.; Choi, S.J.; Jo, Y.; Kim, H.-B. Conformal quantum dot–SnO2 layers as electron transporters for efficient perovskite solar cells. Science 2022, 375, 302–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Meng, L.; Wei, Q.; Yang, Z.; Yang, D.; Feng, J.; Ren, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, S.F. Improved perovskite solar cell efficiency by tuning the colloidal size and free ion concentration in precursor solution using formic acid additive. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 41, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Turren-Cruz, S.-H.; Hagfeldt, A.; Saliba, M. Methylammonium-free, high-performance, and stable perovskite solar cells on a planar architecture. Science 2018, 362, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, H.; Ye, F.; Tang, W.; He, J.; Yin, M.; Wang, Y.; Xie, F.; Bi, E.; Yang, X.; Grätzel, M. A solvent-and vacuum-free route to large-area perovskite films for efficient solar modules. Nature 2017, 550, 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nenon, D.P.; Christians, J.A.; Wheeler, L.M.; Blackburn, J.L.; Sanehira, E.M.; Dou, B.; Olsen, M.L.; Zhu, K.; Berry, J.J.; Luther, J.M. Structural and chemical evolution of methylammonium lead halide perovskites during thermal processing from solution. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 2072–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, P.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Ye, Q.; Chu, Z.; Li, X.; Yang, X.; Yin, Z.; You, J. Solvent-controlled growth of inorganic perovskite films in dry environment for efficient and stable solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yin, G.; Zhao, H.; Jiang, H.; Yuan, S.; Niu, T.; Zhao, K.; Liu, Z.; Liu, S. Precursor engineering for all-inorganic CsPbI2Br perovskite solar cells with 14.78% efficiency. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1803269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yoon, S.M.; Min, H.; Kim, J.B.; Kim, G.; Lee, K.S.; Seok, S.I. Surface engineering of ambient-air-processed cesium lead triiodide layers for efficient solar cells. Joule 2021, 5, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, B.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, L.; Yu, T.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, L.; Yin, L. Surface passivation engineering strategy to fully-inorganic cubic CsPbI3 perovskites for high-performance solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, T.; Dar, M.I.; Li, G.; Xu, F.; Guo, N.; Grätzel, M.; Zhao, Y. Bication lead iodide 2D perovskite component to stabilize inorganic α-CsPbI3 perovskite phase for high-efficiency solar cells. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mali, S.S.; Patil, J.V.; Shinde, P.S.; de Miguel, G.; Hong, C.K. Fully air-processed dynamic hot-air-assisted M: CsPbI2Br (M: Eu2+, In3+) for stable inorganic perovskite solar cells. Matter 2021, 4, 635–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yan, J.; Hou, S.; Li, X.; Dong, J.; Zou, L.; Yang, M.; Xing, J.; Liu, H.; Hao, H. Preparation of highly efficient and stable CsPbBr3 perovskite solar cells based on an anti-solvent rinsing strategy. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2022, 234, 111420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, D.; Xie, P.; Pan, Z.; Rao, H.; Zhong, X. One-step solution deposition of CsPbBr 3 based on precursor engineering for efficient all-inorganic perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 22420–22428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Duan, J.; Hu, T.; Zhao, Y.; He, B.; Tang, Q. Carbon-Electrode-Tailored All-Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells to Harvest Solar and Water-Vapor Energy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5746–5749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, X.; Tan, X.; Liu, Z.; Ye, H.; Sun, B.; Shi, T.; Tang, Z.; Liao, G. Boosting the efficiency of carbon-based planar CsPbBr3 perovskite solar cells by a modified multistep spin-coating technique and interface engineering. Nano Energy 2019, 56, 184–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gao, B.; Meng, J. High efficiently CsPbBr3 perovskite solar cells fabricated by multi-step spin coating method. Sol. Energy 2020, 211, 1223–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ullah, S.; Wang, J.; Yang, P.; Liu, L.; Yang, S.-E.; Xia, T.; Guo, H.; Chen, Y. All-inorganic CsPbBr 3 perovskite: A promising choice for photovoltaics. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 646–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wan, X.; Yu, Z.; Tian, W.; Huang, F.; Jin, S.; Yang, X.; Cheng, Y.-B.; Hagfeldt, A.; Sun, L. Efficient and stable planar all-inorganic perovskite solar cells based on high-quality CsPbBr3 films with controllable morphology. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 46, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cao, X.; Zhang, G.; Jiang, L.; Cai, Y.; Gao, Y.; Yang, W.; He, X.; Zeng, Q.; Xing, G.; Jia, Y. Water, a green solvent for fabrication of high-quality CsPbBr3 films for efficient solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 12, 5925–5931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cheng, J.; Fan, Z.; Dong, J. Research Progress of Green Solvent in CsPbBr3 Perovskite Solar Cells. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kumar, N.; Rani, J.; Kurchania, R. Advancement in CsPbBr3 inorganic perovskite solar cells: Fabrication, efficiency and stability. Sol. Energy 2021, 221, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, S.; Dong, J.; Wu, J.; Hou, S.; Xing, J.; Liu, H.; Hao, H. CsBr interface modification to improve the performance of perovskite solar cells prepared in ambient air. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2019, 201, 110110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nasiri, S.; Palanisamy, P.; Rabiei, M.; Hosseinnezhad, M.; Palevicius, A.; Vilkauskas, A.; Janusas, G.; Nutalapati, V. Investigation of the influence of persulfurated benzene derivatives on optical and carrier mobility properties. Mater. Lett. 2023, 342, 134323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ma, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Lv, H.; Hu, R.; Liu, W.; Wang, S.; Jiang, M.; Chu, L.; Zhang, J. Effective carrier transport tuning of CuOx quantum dots hole interfacial layer for high-performance inverted perovskite solar cell. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 547, 149117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qi, B.; Wang, J. Fill factor in organic solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 8972–8982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Koster, L.J.A.; Mihailetchi, V.; Blom, P.W. Ultimate efficiency of polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 093511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, H.; Ren, X.; Chen, X.; Mao, J.; Cheng, J.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Milic, J.; Yin, W.-J.; Grätzel, M. Improving the stability and performance of perovskite solar cells via off-the-shelf post-device ligand treatment. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 2253–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM images of CsPbBr3 perovskite films prepared by CsBr aqueous solution with concentrations of (a) 50 mg/mL, (b) 100 mg/mL, (c) 150 mg/mL, and (d) 200 mg/mL; 1 and 2 represent the CsPbBr3 films; 3 and 4 represent the CsPbBr3 films that have been post-treated by ethanol.
Figure 1. SEM images of CsPbBr3 perovskite films prepared by CsBr aqueous solution with concentrations of (a) 50 mg/mL, (b) 100 mg/mL, (c) 150 mg/mL, and (d) 200 mg/mL; 1 and 2 represent the CsPbBr3 films; 3 and 4 represent the CsPbBr3 films that have been post-treated by ethanol.
Energies 16 06426 g001
Figure 2. The XRD results of perovskite films prepared with different concentrations and number of spin-coating cycles: (a) 50 mg/mL; (b) 100 mg/mL; (c) 150 mg/mL; (d) 200 mg/mL.
Figure 2. The XRD results of perovskite films prepared with different concentrations and number of spin-coating cycles: (a) 50 mg/mL; (b) 100 mg/mL; (c) 150 mg/mL; (d) 200 mg/mL.
Energies 16 06426 g002
Figure 3. The XRD patterns of CsPbBr3 films (a) with different number of spin-coating cycles of 100 mg/mL CsBr solution, (b) with and without ethanol post-treatment when spin-coating 100 mg/mL CsBr solution three times, (c) the UV-vis absorption spectra when spin-coating 100 mg/mL CsBr solution three times, and (d) steady-state PL spectra of the perovskite films before and after ethanol post-treatment when spin-coating 100 mg/mL CsBr solution three times.
Figure 3. The XRD patterns of CsPbBr3 films (a) with different number of spin-coating cycles of 100 mg/mL CsBr solution, (b) with and without ethanol post-treatment when spin-coating 100 mg/mL CsBr solution three times, (c) the UV-vis absorption spectra when spin-coating 100 mg/mL CsBr solution three times, and (d) steady-state PL spectra of the perovskite films before and after ethanol post-treatment when spin-coating 100 mg/mL CsBr solution three times.
Energies 16 06426 g003
Figure 4. (a) Schematic diagram of the PSC structure: FTO/C-TiO2/mp-TiO2/CsPbBr3/carbon, (b) J-V curves of devices based on CsPbBr3 perovskite films when spin-coating 100 mg/mL CsBr solution 3 times with and without post-treatment measured under 100 mW cm−2 illumination (AM 1.5G), (c) transient Voc spectra of the optimized device with and with ethanol treatment, (d) the forward and reverse scanning J-V curve.
Figure 4. (a) Schematic diagram of the PSC structure: FTO/C-TiO2/mp-TiO2/CsPbBr3/carbon, (b) J-V curves of devices based on CsPbBr3 perovskite films when spin-coating 100 mg/mL CsBr solution 3 times with and without post-treatment measured under 100 mW cm−2 illumination (AM 1.5G), (c) transient Voc spectra of the optimized device with and with ethanol treatment, (d) the forward and reverse scanning J-V curve.
Energies 16 06426 g004
Figure 5. (a) SCLC curves, (b) dark J-V curves, (c) electrochemical impedance spectroscopy spectra of PSCs under dark conditions with a bias voltage of 0.8 V, and (d) steady-state photocurrent and PCE output as a function of time measured at the maximum power point of CsPbBr3 PSCs fabricated with and without ethanol post-treatment.
Figure 5. (a) SCLC curves, (b) dark J-V curves, (c) electrochemical impedance spectroscopy spectra of PSCs under dark conditions with a bias voltage of 0.8 V, and (d) steady-state photocurrent and PCE output as a function of time measured at the maximum power point of CsPbBr3 PSCs fabricated with and without ethanol post-treatment.
Energies 16 06426 g005
Figure 6. (a) Jsc and (b) Voc dependence on light intensity for the devices fabricated with and without post-treatment; (c) the histograms of the PCE; (d) long–term stability of normalized PCE, Voc, Jsc, and FF of the devices with or without post-treatment in ambient air under 25% RH at 20 °C.
Figure 6. (a) Jsc and (b) Voc dependence on light intensity for the devices fabricated with and without post-treatment; (c) the histograms of the PCE; (d) long–term stability of normalized PCE, Voc, Jsc, and FF of the devices with or without post-treatment in ambient air under 25% RH at 20 °C.
Energies 16 06426 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, J.; Yan, J.; Wang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Xing, J.; Liu, H.; Hao, H.; Dong, J. Preparation of CsPbBr3 Perovskite Solar Cells Using a Green Solvent. Energies 2023, 16, 6426. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186426

AMA Style

Cheng J, Yan J, Wang J, Jiang Y, Xing J, Liu H, Hao H, Dong J. Preparation of CsPbBr3 Perovskite Solar Cells Using a Green Solvent. Energies. 2023; 16(18):6426. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186426

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, Jiajie, Jiahao Yan, Jiaming Wang, Yufan Jiang, Jie Xing, Hao Liu, Huiying Hao, and Jingjing Dong. 2023. "Preparation of CsPbBr3 Perovskite Solar Cells Using a Green Solvent" Energies 16, no. 18: 6426. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186426

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop