Next Article in Journal
Deflagration-to-Detonation Transition in a Semi-Confined Slit Combustor Filled with Nitrogen Diluted Ethylene-Oxygen Mixture
Previous Article in Journal
Heat Transfer Model of Natural Gas Pipeline Based on Data Feature Extraction and First Principle Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Aerodynamic Optimization of Trailing-Edge-Serrations for a Wind Turbine Blade Using Taguchi Modified Additive Model

LERMA Lab, Faculty Engineering and Architecture, School of Aerospace and Automotive Engineering, Université I Rabat, Campus UIR Parc Technopolis Rocade, Rabat-Sale, Sala Al Jadida 11100, Morocco
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(3), 1099; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031099
Submission received: 22 December 2022 / Revised: 11 January 2023 / Accepted: 16 January 2023 / Published: 19 January 2023

Abstract

:
For the rotor, achieving relatively high aerodynamic performance in specific wind conditions is a long-term goal. Inspired by the remarkable flight characteristics of owls, an optimal trailing edge serration design is investigated and proposed for a wind turbine rotor blade. Fluid flow interaction with the proposed serrations is explored for different wind conditions. The result is supported by subsequent validation with three-dimensional numerical tools. The present work employs a statistical-numerical method to predict and optimize the shape of the serrations for maximum aerodynamic improvement. The optimal combination is found using the Taguchi method with three factors: Amplitude, wavelength, and serration thickness. The viability of the solution on an application is assessed using the Weibull distribution of wind in three selected regions. Results show that the presence of serration is capable of improving the annual power generation in all the investigated cities by up to 12%. The rated speed is also shifted from 10 m/s to 8 m/s for most configurations. Additionally, all configurations show similar trends for the instantaneous torque, where an increase is observed in pre-rated speed, whereas a decrease is noticed in the post-rated speed region. A look at the flow field pattern for the optimal design in comparison with the clean blade shows that the modified blade is able to generate more lift in the pre-stall region, while for the post-stall region, early separation and increased wake dominate the flow.

1. Introduction

Today, the potential and characteristics of wind energy have already been thoroughly investigated in several nations worldwide. The International Energy Agency’s (IEA)’s 2019 report on Morocco highlights the ambitious energy transition of the country to renewable energy sources. Wind energy is anticipated to be the second most common method of electricity generation after hydro-power.
The many difficulties this sector faces are not obscured by the success of wind turbines as a source of green and renewable energy [1,2]. Grasping and evaluating the operation of wind turbines requires a thorough understanding of wind dynamics. Additionally, the location has a big impact on the frequency and speed of the wind. In order to determine the performance of wind, the statistical features of the wind speeds at the location of installation of the wind farm must be considered. Indeed, the market value of wind power declines during periods of heavy winds, and the exchange price for wind power tends to be near zero on windy days as the amount of wind power in the energy system increase [3,4]. Modern wind turbine blades have increased in size by a factor of 100 versus a drop in energy by a factor of 5 in the past 30 years. This rise comes at a cost for the companies. Due to the size, the blade geometry must be created during the design phase while considering both aerodynamic and acoustic requirements. The future of wind turbines should be focused more on the improvement of these machines for better power output in unfavorable conditions.
A potential solution to improve existing wind turbines is the addition of flow-control devices to the rotor blades. Flow control devices can effectively prevent or delay flow separation and suppress turbulence resulting in improved aerodynamic and aeroacoustics performance, load reduction, fluctuation suppression, and ultimately increased wind turbine power output [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
Through learning from its miraculous nature, researchers and engineers have proposed techniques that have revolutionized modern machinery [10,16]. Birds, in particular, have inspired human flight since the early days of flight machine development and continue to inspire the aerospace industry on different levels. Owls have been extensively researched as potential star raptors, and it was discovered that the owl’s exceptional ability to fly is mostly due to its distinctive feather structure. Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) experiments [17,18] of owl-like surfaces have demonstrated its ability to delay the transition, reduce the separation bubble and decay the vortical structures along the wing. To understand the unique morphological characteristics and the biological mechanisms of the owl’s flight, Bachmann et al. [19] compared the wing of a barn owl to that of a pigeon with an emphasis on the distinctive features of the owl’s feathers, both on a macroscopic and microscopic level. They reported that owl feathers had some characteristic features, such as serrations at the leading edge of the wing, fringes at the edges of each feather, and a velvet-like dorsal surface. This study also pointed out the notably larger area of owl wings compared to pigeons with the same body mass, allowing the owl to generate enough lift to glide at a relatively low speed. The wings of owls are significantly different from those of all other groups of birds in terms of the intricate pattern and surface roughness. Typically, the feathers of an owl have directional textures, velvet-like surfaces, leading edge combs, and trailing edge fringes.
Extensive literature [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27] detailing the owl wing morphological structure in general and trailing edge shapes in particular is available. Figure 1 shows the placement of serrations and fringes on a sample feather. Serrations are found on some of the primary feathers of an owl, especially towards the tip of the feather. At the same time, thin fringes can be found on the trailing edge of each primary feather. The thickness of the feather decreases towards the end of the fringes. These fringes reveal variations in size and direction within a single feather as well as between many feathers on a single wing. From the base of the feather toward the tip, the length of the fringed region often decreased.
Investigation into the aerodynamic effect of these distinct owl wings features [18,22,28,29,30] has shown that serrations cause the flow near the wing leading edge to turn toward the wingtip forming a stationary leading edge vortex that delays separation and producing non-linear lift on the outer half of the owl’s wing. Additionally, they discovered that transition was moved upward over the wing as a result of the separation bubble’s size being reduced on the velvet surface that mimicked down feathers. Finally, as the flow passes over the wing and sheds in the trailing edge, the fringes result in a smoother lower wing reducing the sharp edges and allowing for the decay of the vortical structures.
Inspired by the owl wing, serrated trailing edges are rising in popularity. Industries have adopted these shapes as they are rather simple to manufacture, and their installation and maintenance costs are plausible. The fundamental reason this control device has gained so much traction is the ability to retrofit already-running wind turbines to comply with noise laws. Saw-tooth serrations and sinusoidal serrations are the two main types of bio-inspired simulation of the owl wing serrations [16]. In general, there are two ways to apply trailing edge serrations: either cutting forms directly from the sharp trailing edge or adding thin serrated flat plate inserts to the current trailing edge. The ability to trail edge serration to reduce the airfoil tonal noise is confirmed through a large existing literature [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39].
Gharali et al. [40] looked into the impact of a dynamic serrated airfoil. Unlike researchers who tested static serrated airfoils, the dynamic serrated airfoil is exposed to angles of attack that oscillate sharply, which is typical behavior for a wind turbine when working in the field. The primary conclusions of their research are that lift values for the serrated case increased closer to the dynamic stall angle, from 18.5 to 19.5 degrees, while lift values for the unserrated case generally remained consistent with the original airfoil at low angles of attack.
More recently, Zhou et al. [35] tested trailing edge serrations on two airfoil profiles and drew a theoretically derived optimum for the amplitude, the wavelength, and the flap angle. The obtained optimal configuration was tested on a full-scale wind turbine on terrain where it was found that the trailing edge serrations increased the annual power output by less than 0.7%. Overall, a carefully thought-out configuration of the serrations is possible to significantly reduce the loss of the aerodynamic efficiency and power generation of a wind turbine in particular operating conditions.
The focus of this research is to obtain an optimum configuration of serrations for the application of wind turbines. Even less work dives into the effect of these serrations on the aerodynamics and, eventually, the power generated by the wind turbine. This work is a detailed numerical study of the aerodynamic performance of different trailing edge serrations configurations on a sample horizontal axis wind turbine. An optimal configuration is sought to obtain the best results for the particular conditions of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) phase VI wind turbine blade. Three-dimensional simulations of the clean blade and the modified blade with the trailing edge serrations are carried out. The results are finally used to derive an optimum configuration. The primary goal of this research is to use a mix of Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and Taguchi methodologies to comprehend how a horizontal wind turbine’s trailing edge serration parameters interact with one another under various flow conditions.

2. Methodology

2.1. Flow Control Model

In order to concentrate the efforts on a set number of parameters, this research introduces trailing edge saw tooth serration on the NREL phase VI wind turbine. Finally, a constant flap angle of 5° is selected, as shown in Figure 2. In literature [41,42], it appears that the lower the flap angle, the better the performance. A preliminary investigation of the effect of the flap angle has been conducted by the authors, and the results confirm that for higher flap angles, the torque generation drops significantly. This is in agreement with the natural fringes of the owl. Indeed, the fringes on an owl wing’s trailing edge are parallel to the flow direction. Maintaining small flap angles is important in ensuring the good functioning of the serrations. Moreover, Figure 3 shows the serration amplitude and the wavelength. These parameters are a function of the tip chord.

2.2. Taguchi Method Plan of Experiments

Genichi Taguchi created a statistical method to improve the quality of numerous products [43]. The application of parameter design, which focuses on finding the parameter (factor) settings that create the optimum levels of a quality characteristic (performance measure) with the least amount of fluctuation, is the main element of Taguchi’s approaches. A potent technique for creating goods that perform consistently and optimally under many circumstances is the use of Taguchi designs.
The first step in planning the Taguchi method is to define the objective function. Ideally, this function will be used as a benchmark to compare the effectiveness of the parameter combination tested. Secondly, a proper set of orthogonal arrays that depend on the factors and levels tested is built to perform the minimum number of experiments allowing us to derive the optimum. Finally, the Signal noise (S/N) ratio is analyzed to define the optimum design.
As indicated by the quality method of Taguchi [44], when evaluating characteristics that become better as their value increases, the loss function is calculated with Equation (1):
L y = k 1 y 2
where k is the quality loss coefficient, and y is the measured output. We derive the Signal to Noise function from the loss function with Equation (2):
S N = 10 log 1 y 2
Evaluating the power output of a wind turbine is critical as the main function of a wind turbine is to generate power. For our application, the characteristic parameter of a wind turbine is the power coefficient in Equation (3), representing the ratio of the power extracted by the wind turbine relative to the energy available in the wind.
C p = P 1 2 ρ V 3 A
where the wind turbine power P = , T is the torque, ω is the wind turbine rotational speed, V∞ is the free-stream velocity, and A is the rotor swept area.
Here Taguchi’s loss Function (4) and signal-to-noise ratio (SN) (5) can be written as follows:
L y = k 1 C p 2
S N = 10 log 1 C p 2
The second step in Taguchi’s method is to define the noise factors and testing conditions. In other words, we identify factors that affect performance and which are crucial, difficult to control, or expensive to control. For horizontal-axis wind turbines, different geometric variables in the blade designs can be described as factors, and various parameter values for each factor are referred to as levels. The goal here is to investigate the optimal design for the trailing edge to maintain good power output. The three factors used in this work are the wavelength λ, the amplitude A, and the thickness t of the serration plate. For each factor, the levels are selected based on previous investigations [16,41,45]. Keeping in mind that the efficiency of serration for noise reduction increases with higher amplitudes and lower wavelength [46,47], a design that also appears in owl wings, three levels have been from the range that has already been shown to improve turbine performance. The design parameters and their levels are detailed in Table 1.
Finally, the quality characteristics were defined to be observed and optimized, and the matrix of experiments was to be conducted. Taguchi uses orthogonal arrays contracted from the knowledge of the number of factors and levels, where every factor and its corresponding are considered equally. When using the Taguchi approach, the orthogonal array will be essential in determining the importance of components and their chosen levels. It offers a collection of minimum tests that result in optimal design factors.
Based on the degrees of freedom technique, the necessary minimum for a problem with four elements and three levels for each factor is 34 (81) tests to equally cover all the factors and levels. In our case, we will adopt the common Orthogonal array L9 (34). The analysis can be completed with just nine tests since only three factors, and three levels are considered in the current investigation. Table 2 shows the L9 orthogonal array used in this work. As can be seen, in Table 2, nine different wind turbine blade designs are necessary to conduct the nine experiments denoted T1 to T9.

2.3. Weibull Wind Distribution

To determine whether a location is suitable for the construction and administration of wind energy facilities, the statistical features of the wind speeds at that location must be considered. The power output is a function of V. Therefore, the loss function is calculated using Equation (6):
L = k ( C p V C p m a x V ) 2
To evaluate the optimum serration configurations of the nine performed tests, we will evaluate the potential yearly power generation in different regions.
Since wind speed is a random variable, probability density functions may be computed by looking at how it changes over time. For the accurate evaluation of that site’s potential wind energy, wind data collected from that location should be thoroughly investigated and interpreted. The potential for wind energy in a given area depends on the wind’s speed and its availability for how long. Various probability density functions have been used to characterize the frequency distributions of wind speed, with the Weibull distribution being the most used [48,49,50].
In order to calculate the wind power density, the Weibull distribution Function (7) is used to represent wind performance [51].
f V = K C V C K 1 e V C k
where K and C are, respectively, the shape and scale parameters of the Weibull function.
For one test case, the yearly generated torque, and subsequently power, is the sum of the expected torques in different wind speeds with the probability of occurrence of these wind speeds in one area for one year. The resulting torque for each case is finally calculated using Equation (8):
T = i j f V i × T i
with “i” indicating the cut-in speeds of the wind turbine and “j” the cut-off speed.
Morocco has favorable conditions for wind power plants, with 17 regions chosen as ideal for installing wind farms [52]; several studies have estimated and investigated wind distribution in different potential regions [48,53,54].
Three representative cities of the wind regions of Morocco have been selected to evaluate the viability of the proposed optimal condition relative to the potential region for installation. The southern coastal city of Dakhla is selected to represent region 1 in Morocco’s reference wind map. Representing region 2 is the city of Laayoune, and region 3 will be depicted using Essaouira. Weibull’s distribution for the three cities is available in the literature [48]. The latter conducted measurements for five years in six cities and used the least squares (graphical method), Maximum likelihood, and Wind Atlas Analysis and Application Program (WAsP) methods to find an appropriate estimation of the Weibull parameters.
Table 3 summarizes the findings of Allouhi et al. [48] that will be used as a deciding factor for the selection of the optimal trailing edge serration design.

3. Numerical Setup and Model Validation

3.1. Physical Model

This study uses the NREL phase VI wind turbine with 19.8 KW. The lengthy experimental program produced a comprehensive data set detailing different configurations and their aerodynamic performance, printed in numerous NREL reports [55,56,57,58,59].
The blade of the NREL phase VI wind turbine has a linear chord distribution and a nonlinear twist distribution. It has a 5.029 m blade radius and a 12.192 m tower height. The blades are installed with a tip pitch angle of 3° and a fixed yaw angle of 0°. All the cases are run with constant density ρ = 1.24 Kg/m3.
The detailed geometrical specifications of this twisted and tapered blade can be found in the open literature [60]. Table 4 provides a list of the design and operational parameters of the baseline NREL phase VI wind turbine, and Table 5 details the test cases considered for this work. Here forth, the baseline geometry will be named the clean blade.
In order to analyze the effect of trailing edge serrations on a fully rotating wind turbine, the NREL phase VI wind turbine rotor blade geometry is retained for the body of the modified blade. The modified geometry comprises a serration plate in the trailing edge between 50% of the blade radius to 100% of the blade radius. In this area, the twist angles vary between 3.425° and −1.815°. As detailed in Section 1, the serration wavelength (λ), serration plate thickness (t), and serration amplitude (H) are the three primary geometrical parameters related to a saw-tooth serration. These parameters are varied with respect to the constant tip chord length of ctip = 0.35 m. Figure 4a shows a planar view of a sample configuration of the modified blade with trailing edge serrations. A distance of 0.5 mm exists between the serration and the blade tip. As mentioned in Section 1, an angle of 5° exists between the serration and the chord line at the position of occurrence of the serration. Figure 4b shows the computational domain and boundary conditions.
ANSYS Fluent is used to do the three-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) study. Ten wind speeds covering the range between 5 m/s and 21 m/s were investigated for the clean blade and all variants of the modified blade.
Although high wind speeds (more than 15 m/s) are often characterized by unsteady phenomena, the unsteady behavior of localized vortices has very little bearing on the overall aerodynamic performance of wind turbine blades [61]. The analysis is consequently conducted using stable Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) Equations with the k-ω SST turbulence model, where convergence is obtained for all the simulations with an error of 10−4.

3.2. Mesh Topology and Grid Independence Investigation

A rotating frame technique is employed in the current study to account for the relative motion of the rotor and stationary geometry components. For all the tested geometries in this work, the employed grid is an unstructured tetrahedral mesh. The computational grid is displayed in a magnified cross-sectional image for both the clean Figure 5a and the modified Figure 5b blades. A detailed description of the adopted grids for the clean blade and the T1 case of the modified blade. The T1 was selected among the test cases for the complicated geometry at high wavelength and low thickness. Table 6 presents details of the adopted topologies.
To ensure a grid-independent solution, the number of mesh elements is varied, and six grid topologies are adopted by monitoring the torque value in comparison with the expected experimental value. Ideally, grid independence should be verified for each geometry and flow condition. In order to lower the number of required computations to cover all conditions, sample wind speeds representing the linear power curve and the highly turbulent part are selected. Table 7 shows the grid independence for a wind speed of 7 m/s and 13 m/s for the clean blade, and 13 m/s for the modified case T1. An unstructured mesh topology has been used for all the cases.
The variation between the finer meshes can be ignored, while the variation between coarser and medium meshes is more noticeable. Finally, the selected grid is the fine mesh composed of about 9.98 million grid elements. The fine grid is enough to predict the torque according to this mesh independence study. The selected grid is composed of about 9.98 million grid elements. The fine grid is enough to predict the torque according to this mesh independence study.

3.3. Numerical Model Validation

The experimental results of the NREL phase VI wind turbine tests carried out by NASA Ames Research Centre are used for validation of the numerical model intended to be used in this work. The same numerical setup that was previously presented is used for all wind speeds. This wind turbine has been extensively studied by the authors in previous works [8,62], and the two-dimensional and three-dimensional flow field characteristics have been analyzed as a preliminary study for future control applications. As shown in Figure 6a,b, the numerical method used in this work is able to closely predict the experimental torque and thrust values for the investigated range of wind speeds.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Torque

The power coefficient was previously selected as the objective function for the Taguchi design of the experiment. The power P is a function of the torque such that:
P = ω T
where ω is the rotational speed of the wind turbine in RPM and T is the torque in N.m.
The main focus of this study is to assess the effect of trailing edge serrations on the power generation of a horizontal axis wind turbine and derive an optimum for the region of operation of the machine. The instantaneous torque is calculated from the simulation for eight different wind speeds at each configuration, resulting in a total of 72 simulation cases.
Figure 7 displays the instantaneous torque generation for all the cases described in the Taguchi L9 design of the experiment in comparison with the available experimental data for the clean blade.
As observed in Figure 7, the presence of the serrations maintains the overall trend of the torque versus wind speed plot. The configurations in all their form on the modified blade result in a shift of the rated wind speed. There is a clear decrease in the rated power in the new rated wind speed. In the post-stall region, the modified blade generates significantly higher torque. When the wind speed is between 5 m/s and the rated wind speed, there is an increase in power production. It implies that when the control method is left unchanged, serrations only increase power output when the wind speed is less than the rated speed.

4.2. Annual Power Generation

As mentioned in Section 1, the results will be evaluated with respect to the expected power generation in a region having regard for the yearly wind distribution in that particular region.
Because it can create more electricity before attaining V = 10 m/s, which is the rated wind speed for this wind turbine, the modified blade’s annual power output is larger than that of the wind turbine with the clean blade. Essaouira’s region sees an improvement of up to 11%, as shown in Table 8. It means that the usage of trailing edge serrations does not necessarily result in a decrease in the aerodynamic performance of the blade or the power output of the wind turbine.
Based on the results displayed in Table 8, the mean SN ratio is calculated by averaging the value of SN of a factor at one level. For instance, the mean value of the SN ratio for wavelength at level one is the average of the SN ratios of the configurations where this same factor has a level 1 (T1, T2, and T3). Figure 8 shows the mean SN ratios for the three factors considered in this study at the three levels described in Table 1. In this case, as explained by Taguchi’s quality method [43], the larger the SN ratio, the better. Increased scattering in the mean SN can also indicate the most influencing factors. In our case, for all the considered cities, the wavelength factor has the highest impact on power generation. Indeed, the serration wavelength appears in different studies [45,63] as the main parameter for more noise reduction.
Based on the results of Figure 8, the combination of wavelength level 2, amplitude level 3, and thickness level 2 is the optimum for this blade’s performance through the Taguchi method.
Since this combination is not part of the L9 design of the experiment, this can be found in the L27 full design of the experiment for a three-level three-factor test.

4.3. Additive Model Results

Applying the additive model is utilized to determine the estimated SN ratios for each of the 27 combinations of components and levels in an L27 based on the L9.
The additive model [44] estimation of the SN ratio can be achieved by using the Equation:
η e λ i , A j , t k = μ + x i + y j + z k + e
where x i = μ λ i μ , y j = μ A j μ , z k = μ t k μ , µ is the mean SN ratio for all the tests achieved in the used orthogonal array, μ λ 1 , μ A j and μ t k are the mean SN ratio for all the tests for a particular factor (i.e., λ = wavelength, A = amplitude, t = thickness). Finally, e is a negligible error.
Using the SN ratio of the minimum orthogonal array L9 described in Table 8, the SN ratio of the corresponding extended L27 Orthogonal array is shown in Table A1. Case T17 in the additive model agrees with the prediction of Figure 8 for all cities. This recommendation led to a simulation that combined the levels of factors in T16. For wavelength level 2, amplitude level 3, and thickness level 2 in modified blade serration designs, the yearly power outcome in Laayoune, Essaouira, and Dakhla, respectively, is 5.30 kW, 3.46 kW, and 6.14 kW. However, the L9 tested cases in Table 8 show that there’s a combination (case T6: wavelength 2, amplitude 3, thickness 1) that yields higher power generation in all three cities. It is clear that even though the additive model provides the best direction to improve power performance, the ideal condition was not accurately forecasted. This approach performs exceptionally well in problems with no-interaction components, as was already mentioned. However, this model is unable to make an accurate forecast for the best design if any interactions between the components were chosen.

4.4. Modified Additive Model Results

In order to account for the contributions from the interactions of any two elements, the additive model is modified by the addition of new terms. The new SN ratio is calculated such that the contribution of the interaction between two factors (i.e., Wavelength and amplitude) is expressed by Equation (11):
η λ i , A j = μ λ i A j μ x i y j
where μ λ i A j is the mean SN ratio of the cases containing the wavelength and the amplitude factors. Equation (12) is finally used to compute the estimated SN ratio while taking into account the contributions from the interactions of each two of the three considered factors:
η e λ i , A j , t k = μ + x i + y j + z k + η λ i , A j + η λ i , t k + η A j , t k + e
Table A2 shows the full L27 array with the estimated SN ratios using the modified additive model. The modified model predicts T16 as the optimum. Looking back at the results of the Taguchi L9 and the verification case T17 from the additive model, it is clear that the modified model estimate is indeed the optimum. The combination T16 in Table A2 is similar to T6 in Table 8, which yields the highest yearly power output in all investigated cities.

4.5. Flow Field Investigation

In an attempt to shed light on the mechanisms behind the improvement due to the optimum solution, the flow characteristics of this configuration are studied. Through Taguchi’s modified additive model, we identified experiment T16 as the optimum solution. This model leads to a mean improvement of 12% in yearly generated power.
In order to understand the reason for the high torque production for wind speeds lower than the rated wind speed (V = 10 m/s), the coefficient of lift distribution over the wind turbine radius is evaluated. In theory, sawtooth-shaped serrations with edges angled less than 45° to the direction of the mean flow should be used to obtain the best performance [35,64]. The serration extends the chord line and allows for more lift generation. As can be observed from Figure 9, the lift generated by the modified blade at the position of the serration is higher than the lift generated by the clean blade. Indeed, in our case, the serrations were placed above the 50% radial position corresponding to 2.5 m. This agrees well with the findings of Zhou et al. [35], who also observed an increase in lift coefficient over the real wind turbine in the region of trailing edge serrations.
Torque comparison has shown a decrease in performance in the post-stall region (V > 10 m/s). Indeed, in this region, the blade is fully stalled, and the flow is separated from root to tip. The case of V = 10 m/s is further examined as a sample for the region of performance decay, and instantaneous limiting streamlines are shown in Figure 9. For the clean blade, the flow is attached throughout the blade. At a wind speed of V = 10 m/s, the pressure stays low on the suction side, and the blade provides consistent lift. A separation line appears for the T6 modified blade, which explains the decay in power generation in the region of V > 10 m/s. Separation results in lower lift and higher drag, which in consequence, leads to lower torque. Despite the increase in lift generation for V < 10 m/s, as shown in Figure 9, the serrations clearly encourage separation in the post-stall region (V > 10 m/s), as shown in Figure 10.

4.6. Effect of the Unsteady Behavior

A stable RANS method was used to produce the numerical results shown above. Even with stall inflows, the steady RANS technique ought to be able to capture the primary physical structures over wind turbine blades. Unavoidably, a steady computation will not include the unstable interactions between the vortical structures (such as stretching, bending, and shedding of the leading-edge vortices, etc.). Even with stall inflows, the steady RANS technique ought to be able to capture the primary physical structures over wind turbine blades. Therefore, to assess the effect of unsteadiness, an Unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (URANS) formula is used for the baseline blade and the obtained optimum T6 in this section for a sample wind speed of V = 10 m/s. A second-order implicit-time stepping method (dual-time stepping method) is used in the URANS simulation with the grid system described in Section 3. The time step is set to 2.3 × 10−3.
Figure 11 illustrates a clear comparison of the ear wall vertical structure for the clean blade and the T6 modified blade at λ2 = 0.03. The unsteady results present a clear unsteady behavior of the blade. The difference between the near-wall vortex system over the modified bade is noticeable in comparison with the clean bade. With the presence of the serrations at the trailing edge of the modified blade, the flow leaves the trailing edge originating from the pressure side and moving upwards. The clean blade shows conventional flow behavior at the trailing edge, in which the flow curls in the trailing edge from bottom to top. Additionally, the flow over the serrated blade predicted the presence of the serration at the trailing edge, and vortices are distributed equally over the upper surface. The serration will then act as a vortex generator in this region.
Vortices are generated at the edges of each serration, as shown in Figure 12, and curl around the upper surfaces of the serrations in a counter-rotating manner. This is due to the opening of the serrations where the flow is pushed through the serrations at minimum amplitude and curled towards the suction side, whereas, for the clean blade, the flow exits tangentially at the trailing edge. This is due to the opening of the serrations where the flow is pushed through the serrations at minimum amplitude and curled towards the suction side, whereas, for the clean blade, the flow exits tangentially at the trailing edge. Generally, the level of vorticity generated at the trailing edge (Figure 13) for the serrated blade is higher in magnitude in the area of serrations. Consequently, the roll-up around the blade tip appears to be enlarged.
Figure 14 displays the evolvement of the unsteady vortices over the modified blade for case T6 at a wind speed of V = 10 m/s within a period of T = 8.28 s. the vortices quickly develop on the leading edge of the blade and meet with the vortices generated at the trailing edge to be shed in the wake. Above t = 3.321 s, almost nothing changes as the vortices continue to be shed away from the rotation axis. However, the tip vortices continue to grow due to the shedding of the trailing edge vortices. It can be concluded that vorticity distribution over the upper surface of the blade after a given period (t = 3.321 s) shows no change with time. Qualitatively, the shape of the vortices remains unchanged. This explains the ability to capture the main flow phenomena using steady-state conditions.

5. Conclusions

The present work highlights the impact of trailing-edge serrations on horizontal wind turbine aerodynamics through a CFD investigated on a 3D wind turbine blade. To evaluate the impact of different trailing edge saw tooth serration designs on the performance of the wind turbine, the Taguchi experimental design is employed, and the annual output power is measured using Weibull’s distributions of three selected cities. The optimal design is tested and validated for the selected regions through the Modified additive Taguchi model. The purpose of this study is to shed light on the aerodynamic capability of trailing edge serration for further improvement of the design approaches used in horizontal axis wind turbines. The major findings of the present work can be summarized as follows:
  • The Taguchi-modified additive model coupled with CFD is effective in estimating the interactions between the factors and deriving the optimal design for the horizontal axis wind turbines.
  • The optimal design predicted by the Taguchi model and the modified additive model is the trailing edge serration of wavelength is equal to 5% tip chord line, the amplitude of 20% chord line, and serration plate thickness of 1 mm.
  • The optimum design was found to be consistent for the three different regions.
  • The instantaneous torque of the modified wind turbine results in a shift of the rated wind speed from 10 m/s on the clean blade to 8 m/s for a majority of the configurations.
  • The instantaneous torque increases pre-rated wind speed and decreases post-rated wing speed for all configurations.
  • In the post-stall region, the serrations result in an increased wake and advancement of the separation towards the leading edge.
The results obtained in this study show that with an optimal design, the serration can increase performance in certain important regions. In addition, the evaluation of the performance of these wind turbines should be conducted in a manner that accounts for the terrain, as specific instantaneous parameters of the wind turbine are not enough. Further studies in this area can cover the mechanical aspect and aero-acoustic impact of the trailing edge serrations, as well as the correlation between acoustic emission, power generation, and aerodynamic forces in the improvement of an overall wind turbine performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.Q.; methodology, K.Q.; validation, K.Q.; formal analysis, K.Q. and O.E.; Resources, M.F. and E.E.; writing—original draft preparation, K.Q.; writing—review and editing, K.Q. and O.E.; supervision, O.E.; Project administration, M.F. and E.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, O.E. ([email protected]).

Acknowledgments

The computations were made on several clusters managed by the LERMA laboratory at the International University of Rabat (UIR). The authors want to thank Anas Almaakoul from UIR for providing computational resources.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

The Taguchi additive and modified additive model orthogonal arrays and results described in Section 4.2 and Section 4.3 are presented here.
Table A1. Estimated SN ratio for the three cities using the additive model.
Table A1. Estimated SN ratio for the three cities using the additive model.
ExperimentWavelengthAmplitudeThicknessEstimated S/N–LaayouneEstimated S/N–EssaouiraEstimated S/N–Dakhla
T111116.0214.1817.04
T211216.1714.2417.21
T311315.9014.0716.92
T412116.0314.1417.08
T512216.1914.2017.25
T612315.9214.0316.96
T713116.1814.3417.22
T813216.3314.4017.39
T913316.0714.2317.10
T1021116.2314.3917.26
T1121216.3814.4617.44
T1221316.1114.2917.15
T1322116.2414.3517.31
T1422216.4014.4217.48
T1522316.1314.2517.19
T1623116.3914.5517.45
T1723216.5414.6217.62
T1823316.2814.4517.33
T1931115.9114.0716.92
T2031216.0614.1417.09
T2131315.7913.9716.80
T2232115.9314.0316.96
T2332216.0814.1017.14
T2432315.8113.9316.84
T2533116.0714.2317.10
T2633216.2314.3017.27
T2733315.9614.1316.98
Table A2. Estimated SN ratios using the modified additive model.
Table A2. Estimated SN ratios using the modified additive model.
ExperimentWavelengthAmplitudeThicknessEstimated S/N–LaayouneEstimated S/N–EssaouiraEstimated S/N–Dakhla
T111115.9413.9916.95
T211216.2914.3517.35
T311315.8514.0616.85
T412115.9714.0317.01
T512216.4314.3617.52
T612316.3414.4117.41
T713116.1714.3817.20
T813216.0214.0917.07
T913315.8014.1416.81
T1021116.4314.5517.49
T1121216.4214.6017.49
T1221316.0714.1417.12
T1322116.0814.2417.12
T1422216.1714.2517.23
T1522316.1714.1317.26
T1623116.8415.0617.90
T1723216.3314.4517.37
T1823316.1914.3417.24
T1931115.7113.8616.71
T2031216.2114.3517.25
T2131315.6513.8916.61
T2232115.5213.7416.54
T2332216.1414.1917.19
T2432315.9214.0816.94
T2533116.3514.4117.42
T2633216.3614.2417.42
T2733316.0014.1317.02

References

  1. Antweiler, W.; Muesgens, F. On the Long-Term Merit Order Effect of Renewable Energies. Energy Econ. 2021, 99, 105275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Porté-Agel, F.; Bastankhah, M.; Shamsoddin, S. Wind-Turbine and Wind-Farm Flows: A Review; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; Volume 174, ISBN 1054601900473. [Google Scholar]
  3. May, B.N.; Neuhoff, K.; Borggrefe, F. Market Incentives for System-Friendly Designs of Wind Turbines. DIW Econ. Bull. 2015, 5, 313–322. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ribnitzky, D.; Berger, F.; Kühn, M. Innovative Aerodynamic Rotor Concept for Demand-Oriented Power Feed-in of Offshore Wind Turbines. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2022, 2265, 32017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Akhter, M.Z.; Omar, F.K. Review of Flow-Control Devices for Wind-Turbine Performance Enhancement. Energies 2021, 14, 1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rehman, S.; Mahbub Alam, M.; Alhems, L.M.; Mujahid Rafique, M. Horizontal AxisWind Turbine Blade Design Methodologies for Efficiency Enhancement A Review. Energies 2018, 11, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pechlivanoglou, G. Passive and Active Flow Control Solutions for Wind Turbine Blades; Technische Universität Berlin—University Library Fasanenstraße 88: Berlin, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Qaissi, K.; Elsayed, O.; Faqir, M.; Essadiqi, E. Performance Enhancement Analysis of a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine by Vortex Trapping Cavity. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2022, 144, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, J.; Feng, L. Flow Control Techniques and Applications; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2019; ISBN 9780333227794. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rose, J.B.R.; Natarajan, S.G.; Gopinathan, V.T. Biomimetic Flow Control Techniques for Aerospace Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2021, 20, 645–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Elsayed, O.A.; Asrar, W.; Omar, A.A.; Kwon, K. Influence of Differential Spoiler Settings on the Wake Vortex Characterization and Alleviation. J. Aircr. 2010, 47, 1728–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Elsayed, O.A.; Asrar, W.; Omar, A.A.; Kwon, K.; Jung, H. Experimental Investigation of Plain- And Flapped-Wing Tip Vortices. J. Aircr. 2009, 46, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mostafa, W.; Abdelsamie, A.; Mohamed, M.; Thévenin, D.; Sedrak, M. Aerodynamic Performance Improvement Using a Micro-Cylinder as a Passive Flow Control around the S809 Airfoil. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 973, 12040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zadorozhna, D.B.; Benavides, O.; Grajeda, J.S.; Ramirez, S.F.; de la Cruz May, L. A Parametric Study of the Effect of Leading Edge Spherical Tubercle Amplitudes on the Aerodynamic Performance of a 2D Wind Turbine Airfoil at Low Reynolds Numbers Using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Energy Rep. 2021, 7, 4184–4196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Somoano, M.; Huera-Huarte, F.J. Bio-Inspired Blades with Local Trailing Edge Flexibility Increase the Efficiency of Vertical Axis Wind Turbines. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 3244–3250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.; Zhao, K.; Lu, X.Y.; Song, Y.B.; Bennett, G.J. Bio-Inspired Aerodynamic Noise Control: A Bibliographic Review. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Winzen, A.; Klaas, M.; Schröder, W. High-Speed PIV Measurements of the near-Wall Flow Field over Hairy Surfaces. Exp. Fluids 2013, 54, 1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Winzen, A.; Klaas, M.; Schröder, W. High-Speed Particle Image Velocimetry and Force Measurements of Bio-Inspired Surfaces. J. Aircr. 2015, 52, 471–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bachmann, T.; Klän, S.; Baumgartner, W.; Klaas, M.; Schröder, W.; Wagner, H. Morphometric Characterisation of Wing Feathers of the Barn Owl Tyto Alba Pratincola and the Pigeon Columba Livia. Front. Zool. 2007, 4, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Cheney, J.A.; Stevenson, J.P.J.; Durston, N.E.; Song, J.; Usherwood, J.R.; Bomphrey, R.J.; Windsor, S.P. Bird Wings Act as a Suspension System That Rejects Gusts: Bird Wings Act as a Suspension System. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2020, 287, 20201748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Song, W.; Mu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Z.; Li, B.; Zhang, J.; Niu, S.; Han, Z.; et al. Comparative Investigation on Improved Aerodynamic and Acoustic Performance of Abnormal Rotors by Bionic Edge Design and Rational Material Selection. Polymers 2022, 14, 2552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rao, C.; Ikeda, T.; Nakata, T.; Liu, H. Owl-Inspired Leading-Edge Serrations Play a Crucial Role in Aerodynamic Force Production and Sound Suppression. Bioinspiration Biomim. 2017, 12, 46008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Weger, M.; Wagner, H. Morphological Variations of Leading-Edge Serrations in Owls (Strigiformes). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Chen, K.; Liu, Q.; Liao, G.; Yang, Y.; Ren, L.; Yang, H.; Chen, X. The Sound Suppression Characteristics of Wing Feather of Owl (Bubo Bubo). J. Bionic Eng. 2012, 9, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bachmann, T.; Wagner, H.; Tropea, C. Inner Vane Fringes of Barn Owl Feathers Reconsidered: Morphometric Data and Functional Aspects. J. Anat. 2012, 221, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bachmann, T.; Wagner, H. Model for Biomimetic Applications. J. Anat. 2011, 219, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Graham, R.R. The Silent Flight of Owls. J. R. Aeronaut. Soc. 1934, 38, 837–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Anderson, G.W. An Experimental Investigation of a High Lift Device on the Owl Wing; University of Tennessee Space Institute, Arnold Air Force Base: Tullahoma, TN, USA, 1973; 89p. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kroeger, R.A.; Grushka, H.D.; Helvey, T.C. Low Speed Aerodynamics for Ultra-Quiet Flight; University of Tennessee Space Institute, Arnold Air Force Base: Tullahoma, TN, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kln, S.; Burgmann, S.; Bachmann, T.; Klaas, M.; Wagner, H.; Schrder, W. Surface Structure and Dimensional Effects on the Aerodynamics of an Owl-Based Wing Model. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 2012, 33, 58–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pereira, L.T.L.; Ragni, D.; Avallone, F.; Scarano, F. Aeroacoustics of Sawtooth Trailing-Edge Serrations under Aerodynamic Loading. J. Sound Vib. 2022, 537, 117202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dassen, T.; Parchen, R.; Bruggeman, J.; Hagg, F. Results of a Wind Tunnel Study on the Reduction of Airfoil Self-Noise by the Application of Serrated Blade Trailing Edges. In Proceedings of the European Union Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition, Gothenburg, Sweden, 20–24 May 1996; pp. 800–803. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mo, J.O.; Lee, Y.H. Numerical Simulation for Prediction of Aerodynamic Noise Characteristics on a HAWT of NREL Phase VI. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2011, 25, 1341–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Oerlemans, S.; Fisher, M.; Maeder, T.; Kögler, K. Reduction of Wind Turbine Noise Using Optimized Airfoils and Trailing-Edge Serrations. In Proceedings of the 14th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (29th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5–7 May 2008. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhou, T.; Cao, H.; Zhang, M.; Liao, C. Performance Simulation of Wind Turbine with Optimal Designed Trailing-Edge Serrations. Energy 2022, 243, 122998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nedi, J.; Vassilicos, J.C. Vortex Shedding and Aerodynamic Performance of Airfoil with Multiscale Trailing-Edge Modifications. AIAA J. 2015, 52, 3240–3250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Juknevicius, A.; Chong, T.P. On the Leading Edge Noise and Aerodynamics of Thin Aerofoil Subjected to the Straight and Curved Serrations. J. Sound Vib. 2018, 425, 324–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tian, H.; Lyu, B. Prediction of Broadband Noise from Rotating Blade Elements with Serrated Trailing Edges Prediction of Broadband Noise from Rotating Blade Elements with Serrated Trailing Edges. Phys. Fluids 2022, 34, 85109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gelot, M.B.R.; Kim, J.W. Effect of Serrated Trailing Edges on Aerofoil Tonal Noise. J. Fluid Mech. 2020, 904, A30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gharali, K.; Tam, N.; Johnson, D.A. A PIV Load and Flow Structure Study of a Serrated Dynamic Airfoil. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium Application of Laser Technology to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon, Protugal, 7–10 July 2014. 8p. [Google Scholar]
  41. Woodhead, P.C.; Chong, T.P.; Joseph, P.F.; Vathylakis, A. Aerofoil Self-Noise Radiations Subjected to Serration Flap Angles. Exp. Fluids 2021, 62, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Llorente, E.; Ragni, D. Trailing-Edge Serrations Effect on the Performance of a Wind Turbine. Renew. Energy 2020, 147, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Simpson, J.R. Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering. J. Qual. Technol. 1996, 28, 487–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Madhav, S. Phadke Quality Engineering Using Robust Design; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  45. Chong, T.P.; Joseph, P.F. An Experimental Study of Airfoil Instability Tonal Noise with Trailing Edge Serrations. J. Sound Vib. 2013, 332, 6335–6358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Kholodov, P.; Moreau, S. Optimization of Serrations for Broadband Trailing-Edge Noise Reduction Using an Analytical Model. In Proceedings of the 25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Delft, The Netherlands, 20–23 May 2019; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kholodov, P.; Moreau, S. Numerical Study of Optimized Airfoil Trailing-Edge Serrations for Broadband Noise Reduction. In Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum, Online, 15–19 June 2020; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Allouhi, A.; Zamzoum, O.; Islam, M.R.; Saidur, R.; Kousksou, T.; Jamil, A.; Derouich, A. Evaluation of Wind Energy Potential in Morocco’s Coastal Regions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 72, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Khahro, S.F.; Tabbassum, K.; Soomro, A.M.; Dong, L.; Liao, X. Evaluation of Wind Power Production Prospective and Weibull Parameter Estimation Methods for Babaurband, Sindh Pakistan. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 78, 956–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aukitino, T.; Khan, M.G.M.; Ahmed, M.R. Wind Energy Resource Assessment for Kiribati with a Comparison of Different Methods of Determining Weibull Parameters. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 151, 641–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Akdaǧ, S.A.; Dinler, A. A New Method to Estimate Weibull Parameters for Wind Energy Applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 2009, 50, 1761–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nfaoui, H.; Buret, J.; Sayigh, A.A.M. Wind Characteristics and Wind Energy Potential in Morocco. Sol. Energy 1998, 63, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Daoudi, M.; Mou, A.A.S.; Naceur, L.A. Evaluation of Wind Energy Potential at Four Provinces in Morocco Using Two-Parameter Weibull Distribution Function. Int. J. Power Electron. Drive Syst. 2022, 13, 1209–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Daoudi, M.; Abdelaziz, A.S.M.; Mohammed, E.; Elmostapha, E. Wind Speed Data and Wind Energy Potential Using Weibull Distribution in Zagora, Morocco. Int. J. Renew. Energy Dev. 2019, 8, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Hand, M.M.; Simms, D.A.; Fingersh, L.J.; Jager, D.W.; Cotrell, J.R.; Schreck, S.; Larwood, S.M. Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment Phase VI: Wind Tunnel Test Configurations and Available Data Campaigns; Technical Report; National Renewable Energy Lab.: Golden, CO, USA, 2017; pp. 27–28. [Google Scholar]
  56. Jonkman, J.M. Modeling of the UAE Wind Turbine for Refinement of FAST_AD; National Renewable Energy Lab.: Golden, CO, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  57. Lindenburg, C. Investigation into Rotor Blade Aerodynamics Analysis of the Stationary Measurements on the UAE Phase-VI Rotor in the NASA-Ames Wind Tunnel; ECN: Petten, The Netherlands, 2003; Volume 114. [Google Scholar]
  58. Sørensen, N.N.; Michelsen, J.A.; Schreek, S. Navier-Stokes Predictions of the NREL Phase VI Rotor in the NASA Ames 80-by-120 Wind Tunnel. In Proceedings of the ASME 2002 Wind Energy, Reno, NV, USA, 14–17 January 2002; Volume 5. pp. 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Giguere, P.; Selig, M.S. Design of a Tapered and Twisted Blade for the NREL Combined Experiment Rotor. Nrel/Sr 1999, 500, 26173. [Google Scholar]
  60. Simms, D.; Schreck, S.; Hand, M.; Fingersh, L.J. NREL Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment in the NASA-Ames Wind Tunnel: A Comparison of Predictions to Measurements; National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL): Golden, CO, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  61. Abate, G.; Mavris, D.N.; Sankar, L.N. Performance Effects of Leading Edge Tubercles on the NREL Phase VI Wind Turbine Blade. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2019, 141, 51206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Qaissi, K.; Elsayed, O.; Faqir, M.; Essadiqi, E. A Validation Study of the Aerodynamic Behaviour of a Wind Turbine: Three-Dimensional Rotational Case. CFD Lett. 2021, 13, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kholodov, P.; Moreau, S. Optimization of Trailing-Edge Serrations with and without Slits for Broadband Noise Reduction. J. Sound Vib. 2021, 490, 115736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Howe, M.S. Aerodynamic Noise of a Serrated Trailing Edge. J. Fluids Struct. 1991, 5, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Representation of an owl feather and placements of serrations and fringes (the schematic is not to scale).
Figure 1. Representation of an owl feather and placements of serrations and fringes (the schematic is not to scale).
Energies 16 01099 g001
Figure 2. NREL phase Vi wind turbine cross section S809 airfoil with serration extension.
Figure 2. NREL phase Vi wind turbine cross section S809 airfoil with serration extension.
Energies 16 01099 g002
Figure 3. Trailing edge serration representation over a section of the NREL phase VI wind turbine.
Figure 3. Trailing edge serration representation over a section of the NREL phase VI wind turbine.
Energies 16 01099 g003
Figure 4. NREL phase VI modified blade with trailing edge serrations (a) and computational domain (b).
Figure 4. NREL phase VI modified blade with trailing edge serrations (a) and computational domain (b).
Energies 16 01099 g004
Figure 5. Close-up of the mesh topology on the (a) clean blade and the (b) modified blade.
Figure 5. Close-up of the mesh topology on the (a) clean blade and the (b) modified blade.
Energies 16 01099 g005
Figure 6. Torque (a) and thrust (b) comparison with the experimental data [60].
Figure 6. Torque (a) and thrust (b) comparison with the experimental data [60].
Energies 16 01099 g006
Figure 7. Torque comparison of cases T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8 and T9 with the experimental results of the clean blade.
Figure 7. Torque comparison of cases T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8 and T9 with the experimental results of the clean blade.
Energies 16 01099 g007
Figure 8. Mean SN ratio vs. levels for each factor. (a) Laayoune; (b) Essaouira; (c) Dakhla.
Figure 8. Mean SN ratio vs. levels for each factor. (a) Laayoune; (b) Essaouira; (c) Dakhla.
Energies 16 01099 g008
Figure 9. Comparison between lift coefficient vs. radial position for the clean blade and the modified optimum blade of configuration T6. (a) V = 5 m/s, (b) V = 7 m/s.
Figure 9. Comparison between lift coefficient vs. radial position for the clean blade and the modified optimum blade of configuration T6. (a) V = 5 m/s, (b) V = 7 m/s.
Energies 16 01099 g009
Figure 10. Streamlines over the upper surface of the clean and modified blades for V = 10 m/s.
Figure 10. Streamlines over the upper surface of the clean and modified blades for V = 10 m/s.
Energies 16 01099 g010
Figure 11. Instantaneous λ2 criterion with level 0.03 at the time of 8.28 s for the clean blade and modified blade with configuration T6 at wind speed V = 10 m/s.
Figure 11. Instantaneous λ2 criterion with level 0.03 at the time of 8.28 s for the clean blade and modified blade with configuration T6 at wind speed V = 10 m/s.
Energies 16 01099 g011
Figure 12. Vorticity core region with level 0.15 at V = 10 m/s.
Figure 12. Vorticity core region with level 0.15 at V = 10 m/s.
Energies 16 01099 g012
Figure 13. Vorticity magnitude levels for the serrated T6 blade at V = 10 m/s.
Figure 13. Vorticity magnitude levels for the serrated T6 blade at V = 10 m/s.
Energies 16 01099 g013
Figure 14. Time-dependent Q criterion at level 1,000,000 for the serrated T6 blade at V = 10 m/s.
Figure 14. Time-dependent Q criterion at level 1,000,000 for the serrated T6 blade at V = 10 m/s.
Energies 16 01099 g014
Table 1. Taguchi design parameters and factor levels.
Table 1. Taguchi design parameters and factor levels.
FactorsLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Wavelength (λ)2.5% ctip5% ctip7.5% ctip
Amplitude (A)10% ctip15% ctip20% ctip
Thickness (t)0.32% ctip0.49% ctip0.65% ctip
Table 2. L9 orthogonal array.
Table 2. L9 orthogonal array.
ExperimentsWavelength (λ)Amplitude (A)Thickness (t)
T1111
T2122
T3133
T4212
T5223
T6231
T7313
T8321
T9332
Table 3. Weibull parameters for the chosen regions [48].
Table 3. Weibull parameters for the chosen regions [48].
RegionWeibull KWeibull CMean Wind Speed (m/s)
Dakhla4.358.627.85
Laayoun3.458.177.35
Essaouira2.646.715.96
Table 4. NREL phase VI wind turbine parameters.
Table 4. NREL phase VI wind turbine parameters.
ParameterValue
Blades number2
Blade radius5.029 m
Minimum chord0.35 m
Blades rotational speed72 RPM
Direction of rotationCounter-clockwise
Table 5. Test cases used for the NREL phase VI wind turbine.
Table 5. Test cases used for the NREL phase VI wind turbine.
CasesWind Speed (m/s)TSRPitch Angle (Degree)
S0557.58
S0666.32
S0775.42
S0884.74
S0994.21
S10103.79
S13132.92
S15152.59
S18202.08
S21211.78
Table 6. Details of grid topology used are used for the clean and the modified blades.
Table 6. Details of grid topology used are used for the clean and the modified blades.
CaseTotal Grid Elements (106)Total Grid Nodes (106)Blade FaceBlade Face SizeSerration Band FacesInterior Fluid Body Faces
Clean9.981.77441,3080.005-19,651,385
T137.396.60824,8390.005429,73574,046,431
Table 7. Grid independence of an unstructured mesh.
Table 7. Grid independence of an unstructured mesh.
Clean Blade: At 7 m/sClean Blade: At 13 m/sModified Blade: Case T1 at 13 m/s
Elements (106)Torque (N.m)Elements (106)Torque (N.m)Elements (106)Torque (N.m)
Extremely Coarse0.92350.93.12583.7610.10298.3
Coarse1.11368.495.12590.6911.29258.3
medium1.45399.216.92601.9415.43233.13
Fine2.73414.809.98642.4127.60238.10
Finer3.27418.2510.83644.0837.39237.80
Extremely fine9.98414.8012.34642.1039.63236.30
Table 8. Comparison of the yearly power generation and SN ratios for all experiments at three different cities.
Table 8. Comparison of the yearly power generation and SN ratios for all experiments at three different cities.
CasesLaayouneEssaouiraDakhla
Yearly Power (kW)Improvement%SN RatioYearly Power (kW)Improvement%SN RatioYearly Power (kW)Improvement%SN Ratio
Clean5.93--4.72--6.79--
T16.336.7116.035.097.9213.077.124.8617.05
T26.499.4516.255.179.5513.177.348.0817.31
T36.316.3916.005.138.7813.017.104.5617.02
T46.5410.2116.315.2711.6613.237.388.7517.37
T56.418.1416.145.138.8013.077.256.7417.20
T66.6512.0916.455.3814.1013.357.5010.5017.50
T76.214.6415.865.036.6612.946.972.6016.86
T86.214.6515.865.016.3012.846.992.9416.89
T96.489.3216.245.169.4513.147.327.7817.29
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qaissi, K.; Elsayed, O.; Faqir, M.; Essadiqi, E. Aerodynamic Optimization of Trailing-Edge-Serrations for a Wind Turbine Blade Using Taguchi Modified Additive Model. Energies 2023, 16, 1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031099

AMA Style

Qaissi K, Elsayed O, Faqir M, Essadiqi E. Aerodynamic Optimization of Trailing-Edge-Serrations for a Wind Turbine Blade Using Taguchi Modified Additive Model. Energies. 2023; 16(3):1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031099

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qaissi, Khaoula, Omer Elsayed, Mustapha Faqir, and Elhachmi Essadiqi. 2023. "Aerodynamic Optimization of Trailing-Edge-Serrations for a Wind Turbine Blade Using Taguchi Modified Additive Model" Energies 16, no. 3: 1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031099

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop