Next Article in Journal
Characteristics of Tight Gas Reservoirs in the Xujiahe Formation in the Western Sichuan Depression: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Invasive Method-Based Estimation of Battery State-of-Health with Dynamical Response Characteristics of Load Surges
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Energies
Volume 17
Issue 3
10.3390/en17030586
energies-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Two-Wheeled Urban Vehicles—A Review of Emissions Test Regulations and Literature

by
Natalia Szymlet
,
Łukasz Rymaniak
* and
Piotr Lijewski
Institute of Combustion Engines and Powertrains, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Transport, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3, PL-60965 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2024, 17(3), 586; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17030586
Submission received: 29 November 2023 / Revised: 18 January 2024 / Accepted: 22 January 2024 / Published: 25 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Alternative Powertrains in Urban Mobility—Trends, Challenges and Opportunities in Energy Flow Analysis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Two-wheeled vehicles, due to their population, constitute a significant share of road vehicles in Europe. Therefore, this article presents an overview and analysis of the applicable legal regulations regarding two-wheeled vehicle engines in terms of toxic exhaust emission tests. For the correct interpretation of emission standards, the authors of this work made the necessary analysis of the categorization of two-wheeled vehicles based on Polish law and the criteria of European regulations. The presented analysis concerns not only the current regulations, but also their development trends over the years. These considerations are supplemented with a literature review, which includes the problems of the ecology, energy consumption and construction of the considered group of vehicles. The work presented in this article also concerns the assessment of the conditions for conducting tests on objects belonging to category L in laboratory conditions on chassis dynamometers. On this basis, considerations were made to evaluate the currently applicable WMTC (World Motorcycle Test Cycle) test by comparing it with the actual operation of two-wheeled vehicles. This resulted in the formulation of conclusions regarding the need to introduce procedures for testing pollutant emissions in road conditions in the approval process.

1. Introduction

Air quality, especially in large urban centers, is a matter of serious concern for both the inhabitants of the area and the decision makers responsible for them. Although mobility is a key enabler of economic growth and citizens’ well-being, its sustainability aspect has become fundamental. Transport is one of the main sources of environmental pollution on a global scale, which results in global warming caused by greenhouse gases and local smog in urban agglomerations. Most scientists now agree that climate change is due to the Greenhouse Effect (GHE), which is largely caused by CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) [1,2,3].
Recent findings also confirm the adverse health effects caused by air pollution (nanoparticles, suspended dust mass, ozone, nitrogen oxides, etc.). Near main roads, the level is significantly higher than that resulting from general pollution in urban areas. Populations living and working close to major transport infrastructure may, therefore, be more exposed to the negative effects of increased levels of air pollution [4,5,6,7,8]. According to the report of the World Health Organization [8], the level of pollution in urban agglomerations is significant in both developed and developing countries. According to data provided by the organization, 90% of the urban population around the world breathes air that significantly exceeds the permissible values of toxic compounds (Figure 1), and the number of deaths caused by air pollution is also excessive [8].
Continuous economic development and the related increase in the wealth of the population of global agglomerations leads to an increasing share of road transport. It is predicted that, by 2050, the number of vehicles in the world will double [9]. This justifies the need for research and development on low-emission drive system solutions, e.g., all-electric drives [10,11,12,13,14]. The increase in the number of vehicles in recent years applies to all categories, including two-wheeled vehicles, which are the subject of the article.
For the transport policy of the European Union, including Poland, the reduction of exhaust gas emissions and road congestion, where one of them is a result of the other, are extremely important issues. The problem has been noticed by international entities such as the European Union, for which the idea of sustainable development is extremely important, as evidenced by the document published in 2011 entitled White Paper “Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area—Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system”. It constitutes the basis for all member states to implement a sustainable and integrated transport policy, the main goal of which is to reduce emissions by 60% while supporting mobility and the development of the transport sector. This policy should be understood as a socio-economic development strategy that aims at ecological balance. The aim of this strategy is to improve the quality of life of society while maintaining the economic efficiency of the transport sector [15].
The solution, aimed at reducing the level of traffic congestion in cities and non-urban areas, is the use of two-wheelers, which causes a continuous increase in the share of this category of vehicles, mainly in Asian countries, where the problem of urban congestion is particularly visible. Moreover, two-wheeled vehicles compensate for the lack of public transport in remote non-urban areas and they also ensure the effective and sustainable mobility of services and goods as well as special transport, such as emergency medical services and police forces.
The year 2020, in which the whole world struggled with the COVID-19 pandemic (Coronavirus Disease 2019), showed another advantage of using two-wheeled vehicles, namely, a revival on the sales market. This was due to the renewed attractiveness and convenience of two-wheeled motor vehicles for urban and suburban commuting, in a sanitary context where public transport was not considered a safe option for many of its previous users. However, the increasing share of motorcycles and mopeds obviously results in their significant contribution to generating emissions of toxic compounds, especially in urban agglomerations. This is confirmed by numerous works on this problem. Sahu et al., 2014 [16], estimate that in India, 37% of CO (Carbon Oxides) emissions from transport are generated by two-wheelers, while according to Wu et al. 2016 [17] in China, 17.5% of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) come from two-wheeled vehicles. The data cited indicate the scale of the problem of emissions from two-wheeled vehicles, although the scale varies depending on the location.
In recent years, RDE (Real Driving Emission) research has become increasingly important, including fuel consumption and the emissions of harmful exhaust gases. From 1 September 2017, the European Commission introduced such tests into the approval procedures for LDVs (Light-Duty Vehicles). RDE research creates new cognitive and development perspectives for vehicles. Moreover, measurements in real operating conditions enable a full understanding of the relationship between driving parameters and toxic exhaust emissions. This is not possible through tests conducted in laboratory conditions, where it is not possible to faithfully reproduce all operating conditions. By conducting RDE tests, it is possible to determine all cause-and-effect relationships occurring during the operation of vehicles and their engines.
The RDE methodology is currently being dynamically developed for other types of vehicles—light and heavy motor vehicles and off-road vehicles [18,19,20,21,22]. The long-term and intensive research phase and pilot work for vehicles from the road vehicle groups [23,24] and HDVs (Heavy-Duty Vehicles) [25,26,27,28,29] resulted in the introduction of appropriate procedures for controlling the emissions of toxic compounds in real operating conditions. However, there are no studies enabling the assessment of the emission of two-wheeled vehicles in real road conditions.

2. Legal Regulations Regarding Testing of Emissions of Toxic Exhaust Gases from Two-Wheeled Vehicle Engines

Guidance on testing exhaust emissions from engines of two-wheeled vehicles is contained in Directive 2002/51/EC [30], relating to the reduction of the emissions of an environmental pollutant from two- and three-wheeled motor vehicles (referred to as L-category vehicles in the later Directives) and amending the earlier Directive 97/24/EC. On its basis, in subsequent years, numerous corrections and additions were introduced, resulting from the standardization of regulations on a global scale. In 2013, Regulation (EU) No. 168/2013 [31] and in 2014, the supplementary Technical Regulation (EU) 134/2014 [32] introduced significant changes:
  • Directive 2002/51/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 was completely repealed,
  • the number of L-categories was expanded,
  • environmental requirements and implementation dates for Euro 4 and 5 standards were defined (whereby the second stage—Euro 5—is mandatory for new types of vehicles from 1 January 2020),
  • a previously unregulated limit value for particulate emissions was introduced: for one of the classes of three-wheeled vehicles and heavy road quadricycles—Euro 4; for all L-category vehicles—Euro 5,
  • all new types of vehicles for the individual (sub-)categories of motorcycles, tricycles and light and heavy quadricycles, apart from OBD I (On-Board Diagnostic), must be equipped with an OBD II system at the stage of the application of the Euro 5 standard, which monitors and signals the failures and deterioration conditions of the emission control system resulting in the exceedance of emission thresholds,
  • guidelines were defined and implemented, partly at the stage of the Euro 4 standard and completely at the stage of the Euro 5 standard, for the laboratory global harmonized test cycle for WMTC emissions, which was specified in the Global Technical Regulations of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
In Asian countries, such as China and Japan, the regulations governing emissions tests of harmful compounds are contained in documents issued by national Ministries of the Environment. The analysis of regulations shows that European and American regulations constitute the basis for their formulation in the rest of the world. Moreover, legislators are slightly more liberal in their efforts to tighten the regulations on exhaust emissions from two-wheeled vehicles compared to the regulations on passenger cars.
The history of regulations for L-category vehicles is relatively short. The first standard (Euro 1) came into force in 2000, while for passenger cars 7 years earlier, the entry into force of the next standard (EURO 2) took place after another six years. In the periods 1990–2000 and 2011–2020, there were as many as two or three standards for passenger cars per one standard for two-wheeled vehicles (Table 1).

3. Categorization of Two-Wheeled Vehicles

For the correct interpretation of exhaust emission standards, two-wheeled vehicles should be assigned to the appropriate category in accordance with the classification of vehicles specified in Regulation (EU) No. 168/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 [31]. Category-L vehicles are two-, three- or four-wheeled vehicles, the detailed division of which is presented in Table 2.
The L-category vehicles are further classified on the basis of their type of propulsion:
  • vehicles equipped with an internal combustion engine:
    • with spark ignition,
    • with compression ignition,
  • vehicles equipped with an external combustion engine, a turbine or an engine in which a piston rotates inside a cylinder. For the purposes of compliance with environmental protection and functional safety requirements, a vehicle powered in this way is considered to be the same as a vehicle powered by an internal combustion engine,
  • vehicles equipped with a pre-compressed air engine that does not emit levels of pollutants or inert gases higher than those present in ambient air, provided that, with respect to functional safety and fuel storage and fueling requirements, such vehicles are considered to be gaseous fuel vehicles,
  • electric vehicle,
  • hybrid vehicle.
Table 2 describes the detailed classification of individual categories. Their characteristic criteria are described in detail in the European Commission Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 [31].

4. Emission Standards for Toxic Compounds in the European Union and in the World

The exhaust emission standards that apply in Europe are referred to as Euro standards, translated as a “European exhaust emission standard”. They contain the permissible emission values for vehicles used in the European Union. They are developed in a series of European directives, which are characterized by a certain restrictiveness. The beginning of the 1990s was characterized by a 20% share of two-wheeled vehicles in the total emissions of toxic compounds from all road vehicles [33]. Therefore, from June 1999, the Euro 1 standard came into force, intended only for two-wheeled vehicles (motorcycles and mopeds), and their values were determined only by the engine displacement [30]. During the development of subsequent Euro standards, the restructuring process between Euro 1 and Euro 3 led to a significant 80% reduction in carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon emissions and an 83% reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions (Figure 2). The limit values for Euro 2 and 3 standards are regulated by Directive 2002/51/EC [31].
From 1 January 2016, under Regulation (EU) 168/2013, the next stage came into force for new types of two-wheeled vehicles—Euro 4—and after another four years, the Euro 5 standard. The document expanded the number of L-categories and regulated the emission limit value that had not been standardized until then, as well as the mass of particulate matter, and also included hybrid vehicles in the regulation. The permissible values, divided into individual subcategories for subsequent Euro stages, are presented in Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6.
In the United States, emission limits for two-wheeled vehicles were regulated by one unchanging set of standards for all model years from 1978 to 2005 (Table 7).
Since 15 January 2004, pursuant to document 69 FR 2398 signed by the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), federal Tier regulations have been established. The Tier 1 standard came into force in 2006 with a new definition of classes (Table 8).
Previously unregulated vehicles with an engine capacity of less than 50 cm3 are class I-A, and the previously existing class I has been replaced by class I-B. The standard has also been optionally extended to include a limit value for nitrogen oxide emissions, which is presented as the sum of emissions with hydrocarbons. In 2010, the standards for Class III motorcycles were updated to the Tier 2 standard.
Currently, in India, the share of two-wheeler vehicles is over 80% of all road vehicles. The history of regulations regulating the emissions of toxic compounds from two- and three-wheeled vehicles in this country begins in 1991 with the restriction of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons. Since then, other toxic compounds have been covered by regulations and emission restrictions have been significantly tightened (Table 9).
On 4 July 2014 and 12 June 2015, India introduced the next, fourth stage of exhaust emission standards for two- and three-wheeled vehicles, called Bharat Stage IV. The regulation has reduced the HC + NOx limits by an average of 42% (depending on the vehicle class), compared to the previously applicable BS III norm. This forced the manufacturers of two-wheeled vehicles to use three-function reactors and an eclectic fuel injection. The classification of vehicles in terms of specific permissible values of toxic compounds refers to the engine displacement and maximum vehicle speed (Table 10). The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, on 18 February 2016, issued a notification about the next phase of the India-wide Bharat Stage VI norms for light and heavy vehicles, including two- and three-wheelers. The emission limits for toxic compounds in this standard have been harmonized with the values of the European Euro 5 standard, and their levels depend on the type of engine power supply.
Chinese regulations regarding two-wheeled vehicles distinguish two groups: two-wheeled and three-wheeled. The permissible level of exhaust emissions depends on the engine displacement and the maximum speed of the vehicle, and in the case of three-wheeled vehicles, the type of engine power supply is also important. The introduction of exhaust emission standards, similarly to Europe, the United States and India, took place in stages spread over time.
The current standard in China for two-wheeled vehicles is Stage IV (Table 11). The much larger share of this group of vehicles in Asian countries has not translated into legislators’ expenditure in terms of tightening the permissible values of toxic compounds that would be equal to the values applicable in the EU. Nevertheless, a clear tendency is to systematically reduce the permissible emission values of toxic exhaust gases and standardize them around the world.

5. Legislative Guidelines for Research

The obligations of L-category vehicle manufacturers regarding environmental performance tests (including approval tests) for the Euro 4 and 5 standards, the specific requirements of which are described in Articles 6–13, are set out in Chapter II of the EU Commission Regulation of 16 December 2013. Individual articles deal with (Table 12):
  • Article 6—Type I test requirements: exhaust emissions after starting a cold engine;
  • Article 7—Type II test requirements: an exhaust emissions test (at an elevated engine speed) at idle and under free acceleration;
  • Article 8—Type III test requirements: crankcase emissions;
  • Article 9—Type IV test requirements: vapor emissions;
  • Article 10—Type V test requirements: durability of pollution control devices;
  • Article 11—Type VII test requirements: CO2 emissions, fuel consumption, electricity consumption or electric range;
  • Article 12—environmental requirements for the on-board diagnostic system;
  • Article 13—Type IX test requirements: noise level.
The type I test takes place in the WMTC driving cycle on a single-roller chassis dynamometer, where the movement resistance and reference mass of the vehicle are simulated, which is understood as the mass of the vehicle with all fluids, increased by 75 kg (Figure 3). The fuel tank is filled to half its capacity. The ambient temperature at which the measurement is carried out must be in the range of 20–30 °C. The vehicle is conditioned for 6–36 h before starting the measurement or until the coolant temperature, oil temperature or spark plug socket temperature is close to the ambient temperature. It differs from tests for light vehicles by constant acceleration and gear changes carried out in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Three measurements are taken. In one of them, emissions may exceed the permissible values by a maximum of 10%, but the arithmetic mean of all measurements must remain within the set limits. The exception to this rule is a situation where, for all pollutants, the emission does not exceed 70% of the permissible value. Then the tests can be completed with one measurement. At least two measurements are performed when three conditions are met for all pollutants: the emission in the first measurement does not exceed 85% of the permissible value, the total emission in both measurements does not exceed 170% of the permissible value of a single measurement and the emission in the second measurement does not exceed the permissible value.
The currently valid worldwide approval test for L-category vehicles is the WMTC test cycle, consisting of three parts. Each of them lasts 600 s and has a different maximum vehicle speed. The first part has a maximum speed of 60 km/h and the vehicle covers a distance of 4.1 km. In the second part, the maximum and average vehicle speeds are 95 km/h and 54.7 km/h, respectively, over a distance of 9.1 km. The third part reflects highway driving conditions with a maximum speed of 125.3 km/h.
The test is part of the Global Technical Regulations established by the United Nations as part of the World Forum for the Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations. The history of the test’s use begins with the entry into force of the Euro 4 standard, and its validity was limited to the categories L3e, L4e, L5e-A and L7e-A. From 2020, and the introduction of the Euro 5 standard, European manufacturers of all L-category vehicles have been obliged to use and meet approvals based on the “Revised WMTC” driving test, also known as “WMTC stage 3”. For vehicles of the categories L3e, L4e, L5e-A, L7e-A, L7e-B and L7e-C, the described test procedure applies.
The WMTC stage 3 test, to be used on a chassis dynamometer for vehicles of the sub-categories L1e-A, L1e-B, L2e, L6e-A and L6e-B, shall follow the course shown in Figure 4. The vehicle speed curve cut-off, limited to 25 km/h, applies to L1e-A and L1e-B vehicles, with a maximum design speed limited to 25 km/h. This test lasts 1200 s and consists of two equivalent parts that should be performed without interruption. The purpose of the WMTC test is to determine the emissions of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons and, where appropriate, the mass of dust, as well as fuel consumption and range when powered by electricity. The tests are performed on a chassis dynamometer, the specification requirements and the necessary preparatory work of which are specified in the EU Commission Regulation of 16 December 2013.
The ECE (Economic Commission for Europe) R47 research test, valid for subcategories L1e, L2e and L6 for standards preceding the Euro 5 standard, lasts 896 s and consists of eight basic cycles (Figure 5). They must be carried out without interruption, and the measurement is made throughout the entire driving cycle, from the moment the starter is turned on. Each cycle consists of seven phases. For two-wheeled vehicles of categories L1e-A and L1e-B with a maximum design speed of 25 km/h, the cut-off speed curve applies.
The ECE R40 test lasts 1170 s and consists of six basic urban cycles, each of which must be performed without interruption (Figure 6). One basic cycle consists of fifteen phases that reflect driving conditions:
  • at constant speed (3 phases),
  • idle operation (6 phases),
  • acceleration (2 phases),
  • speed reduction (4 phases).
The cold phase of the test takes place for the first 195 s (one basic cycle), counted from the cold start of the engine. The warm engine phase covers the last 975 s (five basic urban cycles), during which the engine continues to warm up and finally reaches the operating temperature. The test was valid for the subcategories L5e-B, L7e-B and L7e-C in the case of the Euro 4 standard, and for L1e, L2e and L6e for the Euro 2 + 3 standard, in force since 2003. In summary, type I tests depending on the vehicle (sub)category and exhaust emission standard should be carried out for the specific test cycles described above (Table 13).
A proportionate portion of the diluted exhaust emissions is continuously collected for subsequent analysis using a continuous volume (variable dilution) CVS bag sampling system. The analysis shall start as soon as possible and, in any case, no later than 20 min after the end of the test cycle.

6. Literature Review in the Aspect of Testing the Emission of Toxic Exhaust Compounds from Two-Wheeled Vehicle Engines

In preparation for the implementation of the topic of the article, a literature analysis was performed. Studies in this area included issues related to ecology, energy consumption, the construction of modern motor vehicles, including those belonging to the L-category, as well as tests carried out in laboratory conditions on single-roller chassis dynamometers and in real operating conditions.
The review showed that, in recent years, RDE tests of fuel consumption and emissions of harmful exhaust gases have become increasingly important, and from 1 September 2017, the European Commission introduced such tests into the approval procedures of LDV vehicles. RDE research creates new cognitive and development perspectives for vehicles. By conducting research in real conditions, it is possible to determine all cause-and-effect relationships occurring during the operation of objects and their engines.
In the scientific literature, many researchers describe various aspects of RDE research. Due to the introduction of such tests into approval procedures, numerous items concern the development of the test methodology and comparison with laboratory tests. In works published on this topic, attention was turned to the non-representativeness of laboratory tests [18,36,37,38,39,40]. At the same time, the results of these studies draw attention to the multitude of factors influencing the level of emissions and the fuel consumption of vehicles depending on the conditions of actual operation, such as road congestion, the road profile and ambient conditions.
Traditionally, for many years, emissions and fuel consumption tests for two-wheeled vehicles have been conducted in laboratory conditions, mainly using chassis dynamometers. These tests are conducted within the framework of developed standardized driving cycles, but their representativeness is questionable. This was the starting point for the development of research in real operating conditions. This type of research already covers motor vehicles and trucks [41] and should be extended to other categories of engines because tests in laboratory conditions do not fully reflect the real operation, which is confirmed by numerous publications [42,43,44]. A group of vehicles that are not yet subject to road tests are two-wheeled vehicles. The stage preceding legislative steps is usually a long-term research phase.
A literature review from the last twenty years has shown a large disproportion between the number of published studies on the emission of two-wheeled vehicles and vehicles from the LDV+PC and HDV categories. In the online database of technical and scientific journals—the phrases “emissions from vehicles […]” were first entered for LDV+PC, HDV and motorcycles. It was reported that between 2002 and 2021, the total number of publications for two-wheeled vehicles was only 644, representing a small share of published works for light vehicles and passenger cars, for which 5123 search results were obtained. For heavy vehicles, there were 1669 publications on this issue (Figure 7).
Another analysis was performed for a more precise phrase, i.e., “emissions in real road conditions […]”, for the same groups of vehicles. In the last twenty years, only 66 studies have been published for two-wheeled vehicles, while in 2002 alone, there were 58 studies for vehicles from the LDV+PC category, and this number only increased to reach a maximum in 2017 of 397 publications (Figure 8). The most frequently cited works relating to the emission of two-wheeled vehicles, along with studies on the issue of emission tests in real operating conditions, include [39,45,46,47,48].
The long-term and intensive research phase and pilot work for vehicles from the LDV+PC and HDV groups resulted in the introduction of appropriate procedures for controlling the emissions of toxic compounds in real operating conditions. In 2013, detailed requirements for determining the in-service compliance of used engines or vehicles were presented for the Euro VI standard under EU Regulation 582/2011 [49].
The document concerns the obligation to measure specific emissions of pollutants in real road conditions, using PEMS equipment. In the case of LDV and PC vehicles, the European Commission introduced this type of testing in September 2017 along with the EURO 5 standard. Guidelines for the RDE procedure for this group of vehicles were included in Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1154 of 7 June 2017 [50]. The subsequent stages of introducing tests in real operating conditions for individual vehicle groups in Europe are schematically presented in Figure 9.
For motorcycles and mopeds, due to the small number of studies and, consequently, the lack of a defined problem related to the emission of toxic compounds, road tests are not even provided for regulations in the future. Nevertheless, there is an upward trend in the appearance of studies on this issue. Based on the history of work for other vehicle categories, it is possible that this will contribute to pilot studies and subsequent legislation.
It should be noted that two-wheeled vehicles constitute a large group, especially in Asia and South America. Tests of this type for two-wheeled vehicles are performed very rarely. In fact, the problem of RDE testing two-wheeled vehicles is presented only in a few publications. This is primarily due to the limited space available for installing the PEMS equipment and its weight. Nevertheless, attempts to test in real operating conditions for L-category vehicles have been and are still being made. Due to problems with adapting PEMS equipment for RDE tests of two-wheeled vehicles, numerous researchers have focused on conducting research in real operating conditions and creating representative tests on their basis, which were then reproduced in laboratory stations [37,46,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58].
As a result of these studies, research cycles have been developed which are more representative than standardized cycles, but usually reflect the operating conditions for selected cities and agglomerations [37,39,46,48,54,56]. When analyzing the mentioned cycles, it should be noted that they differ significantly, which proves that building a representative global test is difficult. Most often, local tests were used to determine emission and fuel consumption indicators [59,60,61]. The analysis of the research methods and results of these works reveals very large differences in terms of cycles, e.g., research routes, equipment used and results obtained (Figure 10).
However, one of the few literature items describing emission tests in real operating conditions was based on measurements made using equipment (AVL M.O.V.E.) dedicated to passenger cars, the dimensions and weight of which make it impossible to test them on a smaller two-wheeled vehicle. The research was performed by scientists from the University of Graz [62,63] on a motorcycle with a displacement of 800 cm3. The results obtained in real operating conditions differed significantly from those obtained in the WMTC homologation test.
The presented research in real operating conditions by scientists most often covers the analysis of one run. This is due to the individual nature of the RDE tests (congestion, changes in traffic lights, road incidents, etc.). The test results on the same route but at different times are averaged, then the average speeds and average accelerations are determined.
By summarizing the considerations related to current technical regulations, as well as the research achievements of other authors, it can be concluded that there is a need for the further development of research methods for the considered group of vehicles. The components of the causes and effects are shown in Figure 11. The authors are working intensively on developing a universal method for testing two-wheeled vehicles in a real environment, taking into account the latest achievements in PEMS equipment.

7. Conclusions

  • An extensive literature study and the cited examples of research on two-wheeled vehicles in real operating conditions allow us to formulate the statement that the works undertaken by the authors of this paper are few and are currently still in the initial stage of development.
  • The initial stage of the development of scientific research is related to the lack of equipment on the market intended for testing two-wheeled vehicles. This is also related to limitations in the quantity and quality of regulations requiring such research and they are not provided for in future regulations.
  • Progressive technological development and the miniaturization of measurement equipment now make it possible to perform RDE tests for two-wheeled vehicles. Undoubtedly, such research is fully justified in the context of gaining experience for future solutions for measuring emissions from two-wheeled vehicles.
  • There are many literature items presenting specific solutions aimed at reducing emissions, often of a comparative nature (the use of different fuels or non-engine exhaust gas treatment systems). These publications include such solutions as: the development of an electronic fuel injection system [64], the modification of the catalytic coating of a three-function catalytic reactor [65] and the comparative analysis of the use of fuel with different sulfur contents [66]. Moreover, items such as [67,68,69,70] describe the research and analysis of particulate emissions unregulated until 2020 and the introduction of the Euro 5 standard. These measurements were performed in laboratory conditions on various motorcycles and mopeds, using various research methods.
  • Based on the literature analysis, it should be noted that there are no existing studies and publications containing a comprehensive description of the problem of toxic exhaust emissions from engines of urban two-wheeled vehicles in real operating conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.S. and Ł.R.; investigation, N.S. and Ł.R.; data curation, N.S. and P.L.; writing—original draft preparation, N.S.; writing—review and editing, N.S. and Ł.R.; supervision, P.L.; funding acquisition, P.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study presented in this article was performed within the statutory research (Contract No. 0415/SBAD/0342).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Khan, T.; Frey, H.C. Comparison of Real-World and Certification Emission Rates for Light Duty Gasoline Vehicles. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 622, 790–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mamalis, A.; Spentzas, K.; Mamali, A. The Impact of Automotive Industry and Its Supply Chain to Climate Change: Somme Techno-Economic Aspects. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2013, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Räisänen, J.; Hansson, U.; Ullerstig, A.; Döscher, R.; Graham, L.; Jones, C.; Meier, H.; Samuelsson, P.; Willén, U. European Climate in the Late Twenty-First Century: Regional Simulations with Two Driving Global Models and Two Forcing Scenarios. Clim. Dyn. 2004, 22, 13–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hoek, G.; Brunekreef, I.B.; Goldbohm, S.; Fischer, P.; van den Brandt, P.A. Association between Mortality and Indicators of Traffic-Related Air Pollution in the Netherlands: A Cohort Study. Lancet 2002, 360, 1203–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Janssen, N.A.; Brunekreef, B.; van Vliet, P.; Aarts, F.; Meliefste, K.; Harssema, H.; Fischer, P. The Relationship between Air Pollution from Heavy Traffic and Allergic Sensitization, Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness, and Respiratory Symptoms in Dutch Schoolchildren. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111, 1512–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nicolai, T.; Carr, D.; Weiland, S.; Duhme, H.; Von Ehrenstein, O.; Wagner, C.; Von Mutius, E. Urban Traffic and Pollutant Exposure Related to Respiratory Outcomes and Atopy in a Large Sample of Children. Eur. Respir. J. 2003, 21, 956–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Transport and Environment. Tackling Air Pollution from Vehicles. 2015. Available online: https://www.transportenvironment.org/discover/dont-breathe-here-tackling-air-pollution-from-vehicles/ (accessed on 8 November 2023).
  8. World Health Organization. Health, Environment and Climate Change 24; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hao, H.; Geng, Y.; Sarkis, J. Carbon Footprint of Global Passenger Cars: Scenarios through 2050. Energy 2016, 101, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cieslik, W.; Antczak, W. Research of Load Impact on Energy Consumption in an Electric Delivery Vehicle Based on Real Driving Conditions: Guidance for Electrification of Light-Duty Vehicle Fleet. Energies 2023, 16, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cieslik, W.; Szwajca, F.; Zawartowski, J.; Pietrzak, K.; Rosolski, S.; Szkarlat, K.; Rutkowski, M. Capabilities of Nearly Zero Energy Building (Nzeb) Electricity Generation to Charge Electric Vehicle (Ev) Operating in Real Driving Conditions (Rdc). Energies 2021, 14, 7591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cieslik, W.; Zawartowski, J.; Fuc, P. The Impact of the Drive Mode of a Hybrid Drive System on the Share of Electric Mode in the RDC Test; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. Szałek, A.; Pielecha, I. The Influence of Engine Downsizing in Hybrid Powertrains on the Energy Flow Indicators under Actual Traffic Conditions. Energies 2021, 14, 2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pielecha, I.; Pielecha, J. Simulation Analysis of Electric Vehicles Energy Consumption in Driving Tests. Eksploat. I Niezawodn. 2020, 22, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zunder, T.H.; Aditjandra, P.T.; Islam, D.M.Z. Europe’s Freight Transport Policy: White Paper 2001 to White Paper 2011. In Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 22–26 January 2012. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sahu, S.K.; Beig, G.; Parkhi, N. Critical Emissions from the Largest On-Road Transport Network in South Asia. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2014, 14, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, R.; Bo, Y.; Li, J.; Li, L.; Li, Y.; Xie, S. Method to Establish the Emission Inventory of Anthropogenic Volatile Organic Compounds in China and Its Application in the Period 2008–2012. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 127, 244–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abolhasani, S.; Frey, H.C.; Kim, K.; Rasdorf, W.; Lewis, P.; Pang, S. Real-World in-Use Activity, Fuel Use, and Emissions for Nonroad Construction Vehicles: A Case Study for Excavators. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2008, 58, 1033–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bonnel, P.; Kubelt, J.; Provenza, A. Heavy-Duty Engines-Conformity Testing Based on PEMS-Lessons Learned from the European Pilot Program; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  20. Frey, H.C.; Rasdorf, W.J.; Kim, K.; Pang, S.-H.; Lewis, P.; Abolhassani, S. Real World Duty Cycles and Utilization for Construction Equipment in North Carolina; North Carolina Department of Transportation, Research and Analysis Group: Durham, NC, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  21. Merkisz, J.; Lijewski, P.; Fuc, P.; Siedlecki, M.; Ziolkowski, A. Development of the Methodology of Exhaust Emissions Measurement under RDE (Real Driving Emissions) Conditions for Non-Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM) Vehicles; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2016; Volume 148, p. 012077. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rymaniak, Ł.; Merkisz, J.; Szymlet, N.; Kamińska, M.; Weymann, S. Use of Emission Indicators Related to CO2 Emissions in the Ecological Assessment of an Agricultural Tractor. Eksploat. I Niezawodn. 2021, 23, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Merkisz, J.; Pielecha, J.; Lijewski, P.; Merkisz-Guranowska, A.; Nowak, M. Exhaust Emissions from Vehicles in Real Traffic Conditions in the Poznan Agglomeration. Air Pollut. XXI 2013, 174, 27. [Google Scholar]
  24. Szymlet, N.; Lijewski, P.; Kurc, B. Road Tests of a Two-Wheeled Vehicle with the Use of Various Urban Road Infrastructure Solutions. J. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 21, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Benjamin, M. Toward Clean Air in 2050: Perspectives on Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS). In Proceedings of the 2013 PEMS Conference & Workshop, Riverside, CA, USA, 11 April 2013. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fulper, C. New Measurement Techniques & Procedures for Measuring “Real World” Emissions with PEMS and PAMS. In Proceedings of the 2013 PEMS Conference & Workshop, Riverside, CA, USA, 11 April 2013. [Google Scholar]
  27. Rubino, L.; Bonnel, P.; Carriero, M.; Krasenbrink, A. Portable Emission Measurement System (PEMS) for Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle PM Measurement: The European PM PEMS Program. SAE Int. J. Engines 2010, 2, 660–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rymaniak, L.; Ziolkowski, A.; Gallas, D. Particle Number and Particulate Mass Emissions of Heavy Duty Vehicles in Real Operating Conditions; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2017; Volume 118, p. 00025. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kamińska, M.; Rymaniak, Ł.; Lijewski, P.; Szymlet, N.; Daszkiewicz, P.; Grzeszczyk, R. Investigations of Exhaust Emissions from Rail Machinery during Track Maintenance Operations. Energies 2021, 14, 3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. European Union Directive 2002/61/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 Amending for the Nineteenth Time Council Directive 76/769/EEC Relating to Restrictions on the Marketing and Use of Certain Dangerous Substances and Preparations (Azocolourants). Off. J. Eur. Communities 2002, 45, 15–18.
  31. European Commission Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2013 on supplementing and amending Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards environmental performance and power unit performance requirements annex V. Off. J. Eur. Union 2013, 60, 52–128.
  32. European Commission Regulation (EU) No 134/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 on the Approval and Market Surveillance of Two-or Three-Wheel Vehicles and Quadricycles. Off. J. Eur. Union 2013, 60, 52–128.
  33. European Environment Agency. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Transport in Europe; Technical Report. 2019. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-transport (accessed on 1 December 2023).
  34. Automotive, D. Worldwide Emissions Standards, Passenger Cars and Light Duty Vehicles. Delphi Automot. LLP 2019, 5725, 2815–48098. [Google Scholar]
  35. Vessels, I.M. Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Parts 86, 90, 1045, 1051; EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  36. O’Driscoll, R.; Stettler, M.E.; Molden, N.; Oxley, T.; ApSimon, H.M. Real World CO2 and NOx Emissions from 149 Euro 5 and 6 Diesel, Gasoline and Hybrid Passenger Cars. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 621, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Schroeder, F.; Breuer, B.; Preiss, H.; Weidhaas, G. Motorcycle Noise and Exhaust Emissions-Statutory Testing Methods versus Real Traffic Situations; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PN, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  38. Thomas, D.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Song, B.; Ge, Y.; Yu, W.; Ropkins, K. Comparison of Tailpipe Gaseous Emissions for RDE and WLTC Using SI Passenger Cars; SAE International: Warrendale, PN, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  39. Szymlet, N.; Lijewski, P.; Sokolnicka, B.; Siedlecki, M.; Domowicz, A. Analysis of Research Method, Results and Regulations Regarding the Exhaust Emissions from Two-Wheeled Vehicles under Actual Operating Conditions. J. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 21, 128–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Szymlet, N.; Kamińska, M.; Lijewski, P.; Rymaniak, Ł.; Tutak, P. Use of Toxicity Indicators Related to CO2 Emissions in the Ecological Assessment of an Two-Wheel Vehicle. Combust. Engines 2021, 60, 36–41. [Google Scholar]
  41. European Union Directive 2017/1151 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 1 June 2017 supplementing Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information, amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 and Commission Regulation (EU) No 1230/2012 and repealing Commission Regulation. Off. J. Eur. Communities 2017, 175, 1–643.
  42. Nylund, N.-O.; Erkkilä, K.; Hartikka, T. Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions of Urban Buses. VTT Tied. Res. Notes 2007, 2007, 2373. [Google Scholar]
  43. Pielecha, J. Identyfikacja Parametrów Cząstek Stałych z Silników Spalinowych; Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej: Poznań, Poland, 2012; ISBN 83-7775-127-5. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rymaniak, L. Comparison of the Combustion Engine Operating Parameters and the Ecological Indicators of an Urban Bus in Dynamic Type Approval Tests and in Actual Operating Conditions; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2017; Volume 118, p. 00009. [Google Scholar]
  45. Arun, N.H.; Mahesh, S.; Ramadurai, G.; Shiva Nagendra, S.M. Development of Driving Cycles for Passenger Cars and Motorcycles in Chennai, India. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2017, 32, 508–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, K.S.; Wang, W.C.; Chen, H.M.; Lin, C.F.; Hsu, H.C.; Kao, J.H.; Hu, M.T. Motorcycle Emissions and Fuel Consumption in Urban and Rural Driving Conditions. Sci. Total Environ. 2003, 312, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Iodice, P.; Senatore, A. Exhaust Emissions of New High-Performance Motorcycles in Hot and Cold Conditions. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 12, 3133–3144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Saleh, W.; Kumar, R.; Kirby, H.; Kumar, P. Real World Driving Cycle for Motorcycles in Edinburgh. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2009, 14, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. European Union Directive 582/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2011 implementing and amending Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council with respect to emissions from heavy duty vehicles (Euro VI) and amending Annexes I and III to Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Off. J. Eur. Communities 2011, 167, 1–168.
  50. European Union Directive 2017/1154 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 June 2017 amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 supplementing Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information, amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 and Commission Regulation (EU) No 1230/2012 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 and Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards real-driving emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6). Off. J. Eur. Communities 2017, 256, 11–12.
  51. Adak, P.; Sahu, R.; Elumalai, S.P. Development of Emission Factors for Motorcycles and Shared Auto-Rickshaws Using Real-World Driving Cycle for a Typical Indian City. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 544, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Koossalapeerom, T.; Satiennam, T.; Satiennam, W.; Leelapatra, W.; Seedam, A.; Rakpukdee, T. Comparative Study of Real-World Driving Cycles, Energy Consumption, and CO2 Emissions of Electric and Gasoline Motorcycles Driving in a Congested Urban Corridor. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 45, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kumar, R.; Durai, B.K.; Saleh, W.; Boswell, C. Comparison and Evaluation of Emissions for Different Driving Cycles of Motorcycles: A Note. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2011, 16, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Murena, F.; Prati, M.V.; Costagliola, M.A. Real Driving Emissions of a Scooter and a Passenger Car in Naples City. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2019, 73, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Seedam, A.; Satiennam, T.; Radpukdee, T.; Satiennam, W. Development of an Onboard System to Measure the On-Road Driving Pattern for Developing Motorcycle Driving Cycle in Khon Kaen City, Thailand. IATSS Res. 2015, 39, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tong, H.Y.; Tung, H.D.; Hung, W.T.; Nguyen, H.V. Development of Driving Cycles for Motorcycles and Light-Duty Vehicles in Vietnam. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45, 5191–5199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tsai, J.-H.; Yao, Y.-C.; Huang, P.-H.; Chiang, H.-L. Fuel Economy and Volatile Organic Compound Exhaust Emission for Motorcycles with Various Running Mileages. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2018, 18, 3056–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tung, H.; Tong, H.; Hung, W.; Anh, N. Development of Emission Factors and Emission Inventories for Motorcycles and Light Duty Vehicles in the Urban Region in Vietnam. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 2761–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Mahesh, S.; Ramadurai, G.; Nagendra, S.S. Real-World Emissions of Gaseous Pollutants from Motorcycles on Indian Urban Arterials. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2019, 76, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Satiennam, T.; Seedam, A.; Radpukdee, T.; Satiennam, W.; Pasangtiyo, W.; Hashino, Y. Development of On-Road Exhaust Emission and Fuel Consumption Models for Motorcycles and Application through Traffic Microsimulation. J. Adv. Transp. 2017, 2017, 3958967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Seedam, A.; Satiennam, T.; Radpukdee, T.; Satiennam, W.; Ratanavaraha, V. Motorcycle On-Road Driving Parameters Influencing Fuel Consumption and Emissions on Congested Signalized Urban Corridor. J. Adv. Transp. 2017, 2017, 5859789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hiesmayr, J.; Schmidt, S.; Hausberger, S.; Kirchberger, R.; Zinner, C.; Filips, P.; Wanker, R.; Friedl, H. Current Findings in Measurement Technology and Measurement Methodology for RDE and Fuel Consumption for Two-Wheeler-Applications; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  63. Hiesmayr, J.; Schmidt, S.; Hausberger, S.; Kirchberger, R.; Zinner, C.; Filips, P.; Wanker, R.; Friedl, H. Results, Assessment and Legislative Relevance of RDE and Fuel Consumption Measurements of Two-Wheeler-Applications; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  64. Birch, B.J.; Amann, M. Electronic Fuel System Development for Air-Cooled Motorcycles. SAE Trans. 2004, 113, 1877–1885. [Google Scholar]
  65. Bonifer, M.; Kiemel, R. Enhancing a Catalyst Formulation for a Big Displacement Motorcycle for Future Emission Regulations; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  66. Yao, Y.-C.; Tsai, J.-H.; Chang, A.-L.; Jeng, F.-T. Effects of Sulfur and Aromatic Contents in Gasoline on Motorcycle Emissions. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 6560–6564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Czerwinski, J.; Comte, P.; Astorga, C.; Rey, M.; Reutimann, F.; Mayer, A. EC/OC Analysis of Particles from 2-S Scooters and Potentials of Improved Aftertreatment. Combust. Engines 2007, 46, 165–179. [Google Scholar]
  68. Favre, C.; May, J.; Bosteels, D.; Tromayer, J.; Neumann, G.; Kirchberger, R.; Eichlseder, H. A Demonstration of the Emission Behaviour of 50 Cm 3 Mopeds in Europe Including Unregulated Components and Particulate Matter; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  69. Santino, D.; Picini, P.; Martino, L. Particulate Matter Emissions from Two-Stroke Mopeds; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  70. Giechaskiel, B.; Zardini, A.; Martini, G. Particle Emission Measurements from L-Category Vehicles. SAE Int. J. Engines 2015, 8, 2322–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Energies 17 00586 g001
Figure 1. Percentage of the EU’s population and urban population exposed to air pollution concentrations exceeding EU and WHO reference values in 2016–2018 [8].
Figure 1. Percentage of the EU’s population and urban population exposed to air pollution concentrations exceeding EU and WHO reference values in 2016–2018 [8].
Energies 17 00586 g001
Energies 17 00586 g002
Figure 2. Development of European regulations for two-wheeled vehicles [33].
Figure 2. Development of European regulations for two-wheeled vehicles [33].
Energies 17 00586 g002
Energies 17 00586 g003
Figure 3. WMTC test [32].
Figure 3. WMTC test [32].
Energies 17 00586 g003
Energies 17 00586 g004
Figure 4. Shortened WMTC test [32].
Figure 4. Shortened WMTC test [32].
Energies 17 00586 g004
Energies 17 00586 g005
Figure 5. ECE R47 test [32].
Figure 5. ECE R47 test [32].
Energies 17 00586 g005
Energies 17 00586 g006
Figure 6. ECE R40 test [32].
Figure 6. ECE R40 test [32].
Energies 17 00586 g006
Energies 17 00586 g007
Figure 7. Relative number of publications on toxic emissions from various vehicle categories.
Figure 7. Relative number of publications on toxic emissions from various vehicle categories.
Energies 17 00586 g007
Energies 17 00586 g008
Figure 8. Relative number of publications on emissions of toxic compounds from various categories of vehicles in road conditions.
Figure 8. Relative number of publications on emissions of toxic compounds from various categories of vehicles in road conditions.
Energies 17 00586 g008
Energies 17 00586 g009
Figure 9. Introducing tests in real operating conditions for individual vehicle groups in Europe.
Figure 9. Introducing tests in real operating conditions for individual vehicle groups in Europe.
Energies 17 00586 g009
Energies 17 00586 g010
Figure 10. Analysis of methods and research results included in the mentioned research works [46,51,52,54,55,57,58,59].
Figure 10. Analysis of methods and research results included in the mentioned research works [46,51,52,54,55,57,58,59].
Energies 17 00586 g010
Energies 17 00586 g011
Figure 11. Article summary and cause-and-effect diagram of homologation regulations for urban two-wheeled vehicles.
Figure 11. Article summary and cause-and-effect diagram of homologation regulations for urban two-wheeled vehicles.
Energies 17 00586 g011
Table 1. Years of introduction of EURO standards for PC, HDV and L-category vehicles.
Table 1. Years of introduction of EURO standards for PC, HDV and L-category vehicles.
L-CategoryPCHDVYear of ValidityYears
EURO I19921990–2000
Euro 1 1993
Euro 2EURO II1996
Euro 1 1999
Euro 3EURO III2000
Euro 2 2002>2000–2010
EURO IV2005
Euro 3Euro 4 2006
EURO V2008
Euro 5a 2009
Euro 5b 2011>2010–2020
EURO VI2013
Euro 6b 2014
Euro 4 2016
Euro 6d Temp 2017
Euro 5Euro 6d 2020
Table 2. General division of L-category vehicles [30].
Table 2. General division of L-category vehicles [30].
CategorySub-Category
L1e (Light two-wheel-powered vehicle)L1e-A (powered cycles)
L1e-B (two-wheel mopeds)
L2e (Three-wheel moped)L2e-P (three-wheel mopeds for passenger
transport)
L2e-U (three-wheel mopeds for utility
purposes)
L3e (Two-wheel motorcycle, division by motorcycle performance)L3e-A1 (low-performance motorcycles)
L3e-A2 (medium-performance motorcycles)
L3e-A2 (high-performance motorcycle)
L3e (Two-wheel motorcycle, division by special use)L3e-A1E, L3e-A2E lub L3e-A3E (enduro motorcycles)
L3e-A1T, L3e-A2T lub L3e-A3T (trials motorcycles)
L4e (Two-wheel motorcycle with side-car)
L5e (powered tricycle)L5e-A (tricycles)
L5e-B (commercial tricycles)
L6e (light quadricycle)L6e-A (Light on-road quad)
L6e-B (light quadri-mobile)
L6eBP (for passenger transport)
L6eBU (for utility purposes)
L7e (quadricycle)L7e-A (heavy on-road quad)
L7e-B (heavy all-terrain quad)
Table 3. Limit values for emissions of toxic exhaust gases from engines of two-wheeled vehicles of particular categories in Europe; Euro 1–3 [30,33].
Table 3. Limit values for emissions of toxic exhaust gases from engines of two-wheeled vehicles of particular categories in Europe; Euro 1–3 [30,33].
Euro 1
CategoryCategory NameClassificationEuro StandardEmission [g/km]
COHCNOxHC + NOx
all vehiclesmopeds<150 cm311330.3-
motorcycles≥150 cm31
Euro 2 + 3
L1emopeds<50 cm32 + 31--1.2
L3emotorcycles<150 cm325.51.23-
≥150 cm325.513-
<150 cm3320.81.5-
≥150 cm3320.31.5-
vmax < 130 km/h32.620.751.7-
vmax ≥ 130 km/h32.620.332.2-
Table 4. Limit values for emissions of toxic exhaust gases from engines of two-wheeled vehicles of particular categories in Europe; Euro 2–3 [30].
Table 4. Limit values for emissions of toxic exhaust gases from engines of two-wheeled vehicles of particular categories in Europe; Euro 2–3 [30].
Euro 2 + 3
CategoryCategory NameClassificationEuro StandardEmission [g/km]
COHCNOxHC + NOx
CI
L2eThree-wheel moped<50 cm32 + 371.50.4-
L5eTricycle≥50 cm32
L6eLight quadrimobile<50 cm32+3
L7eHeavy quadrimobile≥50 cm32
PI
L2eThree-wheel moped<50 cm32210.65-
L5eTricycle≥50 cm32
L6eLight quadrimobile<50 cm32
L7eHeavy quadrimobile≥50 cm32
Table 5. Limit values for emissions of toxic exhaust gases from engines of two-wheeled vehicles of particular categories in Europe; Euro 4 [31].
Table 5. Limit values for emissions of toxic exhaust gases from engines of two-wheeled vehicles of particular categories in Europe; Euro 4 [31].
Euro 4
Vehicle CategoryVehicle Category NamePropulsion ClassEmission [g/km]
COHCNOxPM
L1e-APowered cyclePI/CI/Hybrid0.560.10.07-
L1e-BTwo-wheel mopedPI/CI/Hybrid10.630.17-
L2eThree-wheel mopedPI/CI/Hybrid1.90.730.17-
L3e
L4e		Two-wheel motorcycles with and without side-carPI/CI/Hybrid
vmax ≥ 130 km/h		1.140.380.07-
L5e-A
L7e-A		Tricycle
Heavy on-road quad		PI/CI/Hybrid
vmax ≤ 130 km/h		1.140.170.09-
CI/CI Hybrid10.10.30.08
L5e-BCommercial tricyclePI/PI Hybrid20.550.25-
CI/CI Hybrid10.10.550.08
L6e-ALight on-road quadPI/PI Hybrid1.90.730.17-
L6a-BLight quadrimobileCI/CI Hybrid10.10.550.08
L7e-BHeavy all-terrain quadPI/PI Hybrid20.550.25-
L7e-CHeavy quadrimobileCI/CI Hybrid10.10.550.08
Table 6. Limit values for emissions of toxic exhaust gases from engines of two-wheeled vehicles of particular categories in Europe; Euro 5 [31].
Table 6. Limit values for emissions of toxic exhaust gases from engines of two-wheeled vehicles of particular categories in Europe; Euro 5 [31].
Euro 5
Vehicle CategoryVehicle Category NamePropulsion ClassEmission [g/km]
COTHCNHMCNOxPM
L1e-APowered cyclePI/CI/Hybrid0.50.10.0680.060.0045
L1e-B-L7eOther L-categoryPI/PI Hybrid10.10.0680.060.0045
CI/CI Hybrid0.50.10.0680.060.0045
Table 7. Limit values for toxic exhaust emissions from two-wheeled vehicle engines in the United States; model years 1978–2005 [34].
Table 7. Limit values for toxic exhaust emissions from two-wheeled vehicle engines in the United States; model years 1978–2005 [34].
1978–2005
ClassClassificationEmission [g/km]
HCCONOx
I50–169 cm3512-
II170–279 cm3512-
III>279 cm3512-
Table 8. Limit values for toxic exhaust emissions from two-wheeled vehicle engines in the United States; Tier 1–2 [35].
Table 8. Limit values for toxic exhaust emissions from two-wheeled vehicle engines in the United States; Tier 1–2 [35].
Tier 1
ClassClassificationEmission [g/km]
HCHC + NOx *CO
I–A<50 cm3---
I–B50–169 cm311.4-
II170–279 cm311.4-
III>279 cm3-1.4
Tier 2
III>279 cm3-0.812
* This is an optional standard that allows manufacturers to average their emissions or transfer emissions values between classes.
Table 9. Limit values for toxic exhaust emissions from two-wheeled vehicle engines in India; Bharat Stage I–III [34].
Table 9. Limit values for toxic exhaust emissions from two-wheeled vehicle engines in India; Bharat Stage I–III [34].
BS I–III
Year of ImplementationStandardEmission [g/km]
HCCOHC + NOx
1991-8–1212–30-
1996--4.53.6
2000Bharat I-22
2005Bharat II-1.51.5
2010Bharat III-11
Table 10. Limit values for toxic exhaust emissions from two-wheeler engines in India; Bharat Stage IV–VI [34].
Table 10. Limit values for toxic exhaust emissions from two-wheeler engines in India; Bharat Stage IV–VI [34].
BS IV
CategoryYear of ImplementationClassificationEmission [g/km]
COHCNOxPM
2 Wheels2016Class 1
Sub-class 1–2		1.403-0.39
Sub-class 2–11.97-0.34
Sub-class 3–1, 3–21.97-0.2
BS VI
2 Wheels2020PI engine1
Table 11. Limit values for emissions of toxic exhaust gases from two-wheeled vehicle engines in China; Stage IV [34].
Table 11. Limit values for emissions of toxic exhaust gases from two-wheeled vehicle engines in China; Stage IV [34].
Stage IV
Vehicle TypeVehicle ClassEngine Size [cm3]Vehicle Speed [km/h]Emission [g/km]
2 Wheelsmopeds≤50vmax ≤ 50HCNOxCOHC + NOxPM
I50 < V < 150vmax ≤ 500.630.171--
V < 15050 < vmax < 1000.380.071.14--
IIV < 150100 < vmax< 115--
V ≥ 150vmax < 115--
V ≤ 1500115 < vmax < 130--
IIIV ≤ 1500130 < vmax < 1400.170.091.14--
V > 1500 lub vmax ≥ 140 --
3 WheelsmopedsV ≤ 50vmax ≤ 500.731.91.9--
PI engineV > 50 lub vmax > 500.5522--
CI engineV > 50 lub vmax > 50-0.747400.460.06
Table 12. Obligations of L-category vehicle manufacturers regarding environmental performance tests (including approval test procedures) for the Euro 4 and 5 standards [32].
Table 12. Obligations of L-category vehicle manufacturers regarding environmental performance tests (including approval test procedures) for the Euro 4 and 5 standards [32].
Test TypeDescriptionRequirements
Euro 4Euro 5
ITailpipe emissions after cold startAnnex VI (A1)Annex VI (A2)
IIExhaust emissions test (at elevated revs) at idle and under free accelerationDirective 2009/40/EC
IIIEmissions of crankcase gasesZero emission, closed crankcase. Crankcase emissions shall not be discharged directly into the ambient atmosphere from any vehicle throughout its useful life
IVEvaporative emissionsAnnex VI (C1)Annex VI (C2)
VDurability of pollution control devicesAnnex VI (A), VII (A), VII (B)
Euro IV restrictions and test procedures		Annex VI (A), VII (A), VII (B)
Euro V restrictions and test procedures
VIA test-type VI has not been attributedNot applicable
VIICO2 emissions, fuel and/or electric energy consumption and electric rangeMeasurement and reporting, no limit value for type approval purposes
VIIIOBD environmental testsOBD stage I, annex VI (B1)OBD stage II, annex VI (B2)
IXSound levelAnnex VI (D), Euro IV restrictions and test proceduresAnnex VI (D), Euro V restrictions and test procedures
Table 13. Test cycles used in the type I test depending on the subcategory of the two-wheeled vehicle [32].
Table 13. Test cycles used in the type I test depending on the subcategory of the two-wheeled vehicle [32].
Euro 4
Vehicle CategoryTestt [s]s [m]
L1e, L2e, L6eECE R478974433/6529
L3e, L4e, L5e-A, L7e-AWMTC, stage 2180028,912
L5e-B, L7e-B, L7e-CECE R4011705971
Euro 5
L1e, L2e, L6e-A, L6e-BWMTC, stage 3120011,541
L3e, L4e, L5e-A L7e-A, L7e-A, L7-CWMTC, stage 3180028,912
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Szymlet, N.; Rymaniak, Ł.; Lijewski, P. Two-Wheeled Urban Vehicles—A Review of Emissions Test Regulations and Literature. Energies 2024, 17, 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17030586

AMA Style

Szymlet N, Rymaniak Ł, Lijewski P. Two-Wheeled Urban Vehicles—A Review of Emissions Test Regulations and Literature. Energies. 2024; 17(3):586. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17030586

Chicago/Turabian Style

Szymlet, Natalia, Łukasz Rymaniak, and Piotr Lijewski. 2024. "Two-Wheeled Urban Vehicles—A Review of Emissions Test Regulations and Literature" Energies 17, no. 3: 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17030586

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop