Next Article in Journal
A Three-Dimensional Elastic-Plastic Contact Analysis of Vickers Indenter on a Deep Drawing Quality Steel Sheet
Next Article in Special Issue
Development and Characterization of Bacterial Cellulose Reinforced with Natural Rubber
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Material Fresh Properties and Process Parameters on Buildability and Interlayer Adhesion of 3D Printed Concrete
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Use of Cashew Nut Shell Liquid (CNSL) in PP/HIPS Blends: Morphological, Thermal, Mechanical and Rheological Properties
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 13
10.3390/ma12132152
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Reactive Melt Mixing of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate)/Rice Husk Flour Composites with Purified Biosustainably Produced Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-co-3-Hydroxyvalerate)

by
Beatriz Melendez-Rodriguez
1,
Sergio Torres-Giner
1,*,
Abdulaziz Aldureid
2,
Luis Cabedo
2 and
Jose M. Lagaron
1,*
1
Novel Materials and Nanotechnology Group, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA), Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC), Calle Catedrático Agustín Escardino Benlloch 7, 46980 Paterna, Spain
2
Polymers and Advanced Materials Group (PIMA), Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(13), 2152; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12132152
Submission received: 31 May 2019 / Revised: 28 June 2019 / Accepted: 1 July 2019 / Published: 4 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmentally Friendly Polymers and Polymer Composites)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Novel green composites based on commercial poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) filled with 10 wt % rice husk flour (RHF) were melt-compounded in a mini-mixer unit using triglycidyl isocyanurate (TGIC) as compatibilizer and dicumyl peroxide (DCP) as initiator. Purified poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) produced by mixed bacterial cultures derived from fruit pulp waste was then incorporated into the green composite in contents in the 5–50 wt % range. Films for testing were obtained thereafter by thermo-compression and characterized. Results showed that the incorporation of up to 20 wt % of biowaste derived PHBV yielded green composite films with a high contact transparency, relatively low crystallinity, high thermal stability, improved mechanical ductility, and medium barrier performance to water vapor and aroma. This study puts forth the potential use of purified biosustainably produced PHBV as a cost-effective additive to develop more affordable and waste valorized food packaging articles.

1. Introduction

The current concern to reduce the use of petroleum-derived materials has led to the search for natural and biodegradable polymers. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) is a family of linear polyesters produced in nature by the action of bacteria during fermentation of sugar or lipids in famine conditions [1]. PHAs represent a good alternative to conventional polymers in the frame of the circular economy since they are fully bio-based and biodegradable [2]. Among the different commercially available PHAs, the most widely studied is poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB). This isotactic homopolyester presents a relatively high melting temperature (Tm) and good stiffness and strength due to its high crystallinity (>50%). As a result, PHB articles present similar performance or even greater than some commodities plastics such as polypropylene (PP) and barrier properties close to those of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [3]. PHB undergoes rapid and complete disintegration within a maximum period of 6 months through the action of enzymes and/or chemical deterioration associated with living microorganisms. Moreover, PHB is biodegradable not only in composting conditions but also in other environments such as marine water [4].
However, the use of PHB for packaging applications is limited due to its excessive brittleness and narrow processing temperature window [5]. To overcome these limitations, its copolymer with 3-hydroxyvalerate (HV), that is, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), can result advantageous since it shows higher ductility as well as reduced crystallinity and lower Tm [6]. PHBV articles have been proposed to be applied in the areas of food and cosmetic packaging such as shampoo bottles, plastic beverage bottles, milk cartons, cosmetic containers, among others, due to its renewability, biodegradability, and high water vapor barrier [7,8]. However, obtaining PHAs habitually requires large investments due to both the high cost of the carbon source and the lack of efficient cultivation techniques [9]. Indeed, the current production cost of PHAs is estimated to be up to 15-fold higher than conventional polyolefins [10]. Therefore, great efforts in their industrial production are currently focused on reducing the manufacturing cost to make it more competitive [11]. In this sense, biowaste derived PHAs are both economically and environmentally attractive, in particular, those that use food waste as the raw material source. For instance, fermented cheese whey (CW), which is mostly not fully valorized at present, can be used as the feeding solution for PHA production [12]. Nowadays, most significant research efforts are targeted to optimize the extraction methods, especially in mixed cultures, and also to reduce the amounts of chemicals used to make the process environmentally friendly [13].
Despite of the extraordinary suitability of PHAs as candidates for sustainable food packaging applications, they are still not cost-effective due to the fermentation and downstream processes during bioreactor production [14]. In this context, a possible strategy to reduce price is the use of agro-food waste derived fillers, which also allows a more sustainable packaging concept since they valorize residues obtained from the agricultural and food industries, and thus reduce the overall impact of the industrial production cycle [15]. The combination of a bio-based and biodegradable polymer with natural fillers is habitually termed “green composite”, which means that the whole material is obtained from renewable resources and it is also biodegradable [16]. Over the past few years, the use of natural fillers to develop polymer composites has significantly increased because of their significant processing advantages, biodegradability, low cost, non-abrasive, low relative density, high specific strength, and renewable nature [17]. Moreover, these natural fillers represent an environmentally friendly solution since they decrease polluting emissions and energy requirements for processing as well as enhance energy recovery and end-of-life biodegradability [18,19,20]. In this context, different green composites have been obtained using lignocellulosic fillers derived from food, agricultural, industrial, and marine resources such as rice husk [21,22], almond husk [23,24,25], walnut shell [26], peanut shell [27], coconut fibers [28], orange peel [29], recycled cotton [30], Posidonia oceanica seaweed [31], etc.
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is an important crop cultivated mostly in China, India, and Indonesia [32]. The annual world rice production is approximately 600 million tons, of which 20% is currently wasted as rice husk [33]. Most of this by-product is used as a bedding material for animals, burned, or landfilled, causing several environmental and health problems. Rice husk is a relatively hard material since it is typically composed of 20 wt % ash, 38 wt % cellulose, 22 wt % lignin, 18 wt % pentose, and 2 wt % of other organic components [34]. Therefore, rice husk has been used to reinforce several thermoplastics such as high-density polyethylene (HDPE) [35,36], PP [37], PP and HDPE [38], polylactide (PLA) [39], and also recently PHB [40,41,42,43]. However, the inherently poor interfacial adhesion between the lignocellulosic fillers and polymers generally yields a composite with low dispersion and a high content of particle aggregates [44]. This effect is related to the low chemical affinity between lignocellulosic fillers with most polymer and biopolymer matrices, which compromises the strength and also increases moisture absorption of the green composites [45]. To improve the interfacial adhesion between both composite components, compatibilizers or coupling agents are generally added or the filler surfaces are chemically pretreated [46]. Moreover, in the case of reactive compatibilizers, chemical bonds between the fillers and polymer matrix are formed and the overall performance of the composite can be remarkably improved [47]. For instance, the maleic anhydride (MA) grafting of PHBV matrix prior to extrusion has successfully increased the hydrophilicity of the biopolyester matrix making it more compatible with lignocellulosic fillers [48].
In this context, triglycidyl isocyanurate (TGIC) and dicumyl peroxide (DCP) can be effectively combined to compatibilize polymer composites. On the one hand, TGIC is a three-functional epoxy compound that plays a hinge-like role between lignocellulosic fillers and polyester matrices. The hydroxyl (–OH) groups of cellulose present on the fillers’ surface and the ones from the end groups of the biopolyester molecular chains, namely hydroxyl or carboxyl, can readily react with the epoxy groups of TGIC during melt blending [49]. Also, TGIC has been reported to provide a chain-extension effect on the processability of PET, increasing its molecular weight (MW) and potentially avoiding chain scission by hydrolysis [50]. On the other hand, DCP has been used as a free-radical grafting initiator in different polymer systems. In this sense, peroxides can form covalent carbon–carbon cross-links between the biopolymer chain segments, promoting the compatibilization of immiscible components in binary polymer blends [51] and also in polymer composites [52]. In the latter case, the addition of DCP to the composite mixture during melt mixing can give rise to both cross-linking of the polymer chains and grafting of natural fillers onto the polymer chains. Interestingly, due to the presence of three reactive –OH groups on each cellulose unit, the grafting of the cellulosic fillers onto the polymer chains dominates over the cross-linking of polymers because of the higher free radical reactivity of the –OH groups of cellulose [53]. Based on this phenomenon, different studies have for instance reported that DCP improved the mechanical properties of low-density polyethylene (LDPE)/wood fiber composites via peroxide-initiated cross-linking process [54,55,56,57].
The objective of this study is to develop highly sustainable materials with enhanced performance based on commercial PHB and rice husk fillers containing different amounts of purified PHBV that was produced by mixed bacterial cultures derived from wastes of the food industry. The green composites were prepared by melt compounding in a laboratory melt-mixer and shaped into films by thermo-compression. The resultant green composite films were characterized in terms of their morphology and optical characteristics as well as thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties in order to ascertain their potential in food packaging applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Commercial PHB homopolyester was supplied as P226F in the form of pellets by Biomer (Krailling, Germany). According to the manufacturer, this biopolymer resin presents a density of 1.25 g/cm³ and a melt flow index (MFI) of 10 g/10 min (5 kg, 180 °C). Biowaste derived PHBV copolyester was produced at pilot-plant scale at Universidade NOVA (Lisbon, Portugal) using mixed microbial cultures fed with fermented fruit pulps supplied by SumolCompal S.A. (Carnaxide, Portugal) as an industrial residue of the juice industry. The molar fraction of HV in the copolymer was ~20 mol %. The PHBV was purified with chloroform (Sigma-Aldrich S.A., Madrid, Spain) to produce a solid powder. Further details about the biopolymer and its purification route can be found elsewhere [58].
Rice husk was kindly provided by Herba Ingredients (Valencia, Spain). It was delivered in the form of flakes as a by-product of the rice industry. d-limonene, with 98% purity, TGIC (reference 379506), with a MW of 297.26 g/mol, and DCP (reference 329541), with a MW of 270.37 g/mol and 98% assay, were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich S.A. (Madrid, Spain).

2.2. Preparation of RHF

The procedure to obtain rice husk flour (RHF) consisted on a mechanical grinding following to sieving to ensure a low particle size. For this, the native rice husk was ground in a mechanical knife mill (Thermomix TM21, Vorwerk, Madrid, Spain) and then sieved in a 140-μm mesh (TED-0300, Filtra Vibración S.L., Badalona, Spain). The resultant powder was dried at 100 °C in oven (T3060, Heraeus Instruments, Hanau, Germany) for 24 h. Figure 1 shows the as-received flakes of rice husk (Figure 1a) and the resultant RHF (Figure 1b).

2.3. Melt Mixing

Prior to processing, both PHA resins were dried at 60 °C for 24 h in an oven (Digitheat, JP selecta S.A., Barcelona, Spain) to remove any residual moisture. Then, different amounts of purified PHBV, from 5 wt % to 50 wt %, were manually pre-mixed with commercial PHB in a zipper bag. A fixed content of RHF was added at 10 wt % to the mixture whereas the reactive compatibilizers, that is, TGIC and DCP, were incorporated at 1 part per hundred resin (phr) and 0.25 phr of PHB/PHBV/RHF composite, respectively. A PHB/RHF composite without PHBV and a PHB/PHBV blend without RHF were also prepared as control materials. Table 1 summarizes the different formulations prepared.
To prepare the samples, a total amount of 12 g of material was melt-compounded in a 16 cm3 Brabender Plastograph Original E mini-mixer from Brabender GmbH & Co. KG (Duisburg, Germany). First the biopolymers and, then, the RHF powder were fed to the internal mixing chamber at a rotating speed of 60 rpm for 1 min. After this, TGIC and DCP were added and the whole composition was melt-mixed at 100 rpm for another 3 min. The processing temperature was set at 180 °C. Once the mixing process was completed, each batch was withdrawn from the mini-mixer and cooled in air to room temperature. The resultant doughs were stored in dissectors containing silica gel at 0% relative humidity (RH) and 25 °C for at least 48 h for conditioning.
The different doughs were, thereafter, thermo-compressed into films using a hot-plate hydraulic press (Carver 4122, Wabash, IN, USA). The samples were first placed in the plates at 180 °C for 1 min, without pressure, to remove any residual moisture and then hot-pressed at 4–5 bars for 3 min. Flat films with a total thickness of ~100 µm were obtained and stored in a desiccator at 25 °C and 0% RH for 15 days before characterization.

2.4. Characterization

2.4.1. Morphology

The morphologies of the RHF particles and the film cross-sections were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using an S-4800 device from Hitachi (Tokyo, Japan). For the cross-section observations, the films were cryo-fractured by immersion in liquid nitrogen. The samples were previously fixed to beveled holders using conductive double-sided adhesive tape and sputtered with a mixture of gold-palladium under vacuum. An accelerating voltage of 10 kV and a working distance of 15 mm were selected during SEM analysis. The estimation of the dimensions was performed by means of the ImageJ software v 1.41 (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) using a minimum of 20 SEM micrographs.
The particle size distribution was determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using a laser diffraction analyzer Mastersizer 2000 from Malvern Panalytical Ltd. (Malvern, UK). According to the manufacturer, the error for the equipment of median diameter (D50) is 3%. Measurements were taken under stirring to avoid settling of large particles.

2.4.2. Transparency

The light transmission of the films was determined in specimens of 50 × 30 mm2 by quantifying the absorption of light at wavelengths between 200 nm and 700 nm in an ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectrophotometer VIS3000 from Dinko Instruments (Barcelona, Spain). The transparency (T) and opacity (O) were calculated using Equation (1) [59] and Equation (2) [60], respectively:
T   =   A 600 L
O   =   A 500 · L
where A500 and A600 are the absorbance values at 500 nm and 600 nm, respectively, and L is the film thickness (mm).

2.4.3. Color Measurements

The color of the films was determined using a chroma meter CR-400 (Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan). The color difference (∆E*) was calculated using the following Equation (3) [59], as defined by the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE):
∆E* = [(∆L*)2 + (∆a*)2 + (∆b∗)2]0.5
where ∆L*, ∆a*, and ∆b* correspond to the differences in terms of lightness from black to white, from green to red, and from blue to yellow, respectively, between the film samples and the control film of PHB/PHBV.

2.4.4. Thermal Analysis

Thermal transitions were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) on a DSC-7 analyzer equipped with the cooling accessory Intracooler 2 from PerkinElmer, Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA). A two-step program under nitrogen atmosphere and with a flow rate of 20 mL/min was applied: first heating from −30 °C to 190 °C followed by cooling to −30 °C. The heating and cooling rates were both set at 10 °C/min and the typical sample weight was ~3 mg. An empty aluminum pan was used as reference whereas calibration was performed using an indium sample. The values of Tm and enthalpy of melting (∆Hm) were obtained from the heating scan, while the crystallization temperature from the melt (Tc) and enthalpy of crystallization (∆Hc) were determined from the cooling scan. All DSC measurements were performed in triplicate.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed in a TG-STDA model TGA/STDA851e/LF/1600 thermobalance from Mettler-Toledo, LLC (Columbus, OH, USA). The samples, with a weight of ~15 mg, were heated from 50 °C to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a flow rate of 50 mL/min of nitrogen (N2). All TGA measurements were also done in triplicate.

2.4.5. Mechanical Tests

Tensile tests were performed on stamped dumbbell-shaped film samples sizing 115 × 16 mm2 using an Instron 4400 universal testing machine, equipped with a 1-kN load cell, from Instron (Norwood, MA, USA) according to the ASTM standard method D638. The tests were done using a cross-head speed of 10 mm/min. Samples were conditioned for 24 h prior to analysis and the tests were performed at room conditions, that is, 40% RH and 25 °C. A minimum of six specimens were tested for each sample.

2.4.6. Permeability Tests

The gravimetric method ASTM E96-95 was used to determinate the water vapor permeability (WVP) of the films. To this end, Payne permeability cups (diameter of 3.5 cm) from Elcometer Sprl (Hermallesous-Argenteau, Belgium) were filled with 5 mL of distilled water. The films were not in direct contact with water but exposed to 100% RH on one side and secured with silicon rings. They were placed within a desiccator and sealed with dried silica gel at 0% RH and 25 °C. The control samples consisted of cups with aluminum films to estimate solvent loss through the sealing. The cups were weighted periodically using an analytical balance (±0.0001 g). WVP was calculated from the regression analysis of weight loss data vs. time, whereas the weight loss was calculated as the total loss minus the loss through the sealing. The permeability was obtained by multiplying the permeance by the film thickness. All WVP measurements were performed in triplicate.
The limonene permeability (LP), similar as described above for WVP, was measured placing 5 mL of d-limonene inside the Payne permeability cups. The cups containing the films were placed at controlled room conditions of 40% RH and 25 °C. The limonene vapor permeation rate (LPRT) values were estimated from the steady-state permeation slopes and the weight loss was calculated as the total cell loss minus the loss through the sealing. LP was calculated taking into account the average film thickness in each case. LP measurements were performed in triplicate.

2.4.7. Statistical Analysis

The optical, thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties were evaluated through analysis of variance (ANOVA) using STATGRAPHICS Centurion XVI v 16.1.03 from StatPoint Technologies, Inc. (Warrenton, VA, USA). Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) was used at the 95% confidence level (p < 0.05). Mean values and standard deviations were also reported.

3. Results

3.1. Morphology of RHF Particles

The morphology of the RHF powder was observed by SEM for determining the particle size and shape. In the low-magnification SEM image, shown in Figure 2a, one can see that the particles were not uniform in morphology and their dimension varied broadly. In particular, small particles slightly below 10 µm, in the form of rod-like particles or rectangular junks, coexisted with short fibers, having lengths above 100 µm. The magnified SEM image, included in Figure 2b, illustrates that the outer surface of rice husk was relatively smooth but its inner part was densely covered with orderly bulges. In this regard, it has been reported that the globular structure of rice husk is responsible for its high absorption capacity [61], which can also positively contribute to favoring mechanical interactions with the biopolymer matrix. Similar morphologies were reported for instance by Schneider et al. [62], in which the RHF particles also presented a heterogeneous morphology, namely larger particles of different textures, some smoother, others rough, with also grooves along the structure. The histogram of particle size of RHF is shown in Figure 2c, where one can see that the average fiber length was ~190 µm whereas the diameter corresponding to 90% cumulative (D90) was ~320 µm.

3.2. Morphology of PHB/PHBV/RHF Films

The morphology of the film cross-sections was observed by SEM and the images are gathered in Figure 3. One can observe that all films presented a smooth and featureless fracture surface without much deformation, corresponding to a typical brittle fracture behavior. The presence of the RHF particles can be observed in the cross-sections of all the composite film samples, that is, Figure 3a,c–g, whereas the surface of the PHB/PHBV film in Figure 3b suggests that the matrix was monophasic. Interestingly, the images taken at higher magnifications revealed that RHF fillers were tightly bonded to the polymer as inferred from the absence of gap between the particles and the biopolymer matrix. Moreover, no evidence of filler pull-out or void formation was noticed. At the same time, a rough surface attributed to the matrix deformation can be observed in the fillers surrounding. Additionally, RHF aggregates were not observed but individual particles appeared regularly distributed along the biopolymer matrix indicating that an effective mixing was attained.
The above observation suggests that a high interfacial adhesion was achieved in the composites due to the combined use of TGIC and DCP during melt processing. Similar morphologies were also described, for instance, by Rosa et al. [63] for PP/RHF composites when MA-modified polypropylene (MAPP) was added as coupling agent. The presence of MAPP successfully reduced the voids sizes and turned the surface more homogeneous, confirming its effect on promoting adhesion in the interfacial region. In relation to TGIC, Hao and Wu [49] recently showed that the addition during melt blending of the isocyanurate additive improved the interfacial adhesion of PLA/sisal fibers (SF) composites. The compatibilization achieved in the green composite was ascribed to the reaction of the –OH groups present at end groups of the biopolyester molecular chains and on the cellulose surface with the epoxy functional groups of TGIC. In the first reaction, ester bonds are known to be formed with the PHA chains by glycidyl esterification of carboxylic acid end groups, which precedes hydroxyl end group etherification [64]. The second reaction generates C–O–C bonds with subsequent hydroxyl side-group formation on the cellulose surface [29]. This reactive compatibilization habitually leads to green composites with enhanced performance properties [65]. For DCP, Wei et al. [52,66] recently described the coupling mechanism of cellulose to PHB and PHBV. Briefly, when the peroxide is exposed to heat during extrusion it decomposes into strong free radicals, which tend to abstract hydrogens (H’) from the biopolymer and cellulose molecular chains and initiate the grafting process between the two phases in the composites. The authors postulated that the grafted copolymers formed on the interfaces of cellulose and PHA coupled the hydrophilic filler to the hydrophobic biopolymer matrix. Therefore, grafting of RHF onto the PHB/PHBV matrix was successfully achieved by the formation of low concentrations of DCP derived radicals at high temperature during extrusion that initiated both the formation both H abstraction and triggered the reaction of the epoxy groups of TGIC with the OH groups of both cellulose and the terminal groups of the biopolyester chains. In relation to the addition of the biowaste derived PHBV, a good mixture between the two PHAs was attained since it was not possible perceive the presence of two phases in the biopolymer matrix, even at the highest PHBV content, that is, 50 wt %. In the film surfaces one can still observe the presence of some remaining impurities, which may be ascribed to organic remnants of small amounts of cell debris or fatty acids from the bioproduction process of PHBV. A similar morphology was recently reported by Martinez-Abad et al. [67] for PHB/unpurified PHBV blends, who also observed a good degree of interaction between the commercial homopolyester and the biosustainably produced copolyester.

3.3. Optical Properties of PHB/PHBV/RHF Films

The visual aspect of the films is displayed in Figure 4 to ascertain their optical properties. Simple naked eye examination of the films indicates that all the samples were slightly opaque but also showed high contact transparency. Additionally, the composite films developed a yellow-to-brown color due to the intrinsic natural color of the RHF powder, which one can observe in previous Figure 1b.
To quantify the color change resulted from the addition of PHBV in PHB/RHF, the color coordinates (a*, b*, L*) and the values of ∆E*, T, and O were determined and reported in Table 2. One can observe that the a* b* coordinates of the PHB/RHF film confirmed the above observed yellow-to-brown color of the sample whereas the PHB/PHBV film presented a natural color. The incorporation of PHBV into the green composite films resulted in a slightly increased the value of a* and, most notably, of b*, confirming the development of a brown tonality. Moreover, the composite films became darker since the L* values were also reduced. In any case, the color differences in the composite films containing different amounts of PHBV were relatively low, that is, ∆E* values remained below 6. One can also observe that the composite films also presented slightly lower transparency and higher opacity with the increasing PHBV contents, having values of T and O around 10–15% and 5% higher, respectively. This haze increase is typically observed in polymer blends due to differences in the refractive index of light diffraction of each polymer [68]. Although the brownish color of the film samples may seem a disadvantage for food packaging, it also offers the capacity to partially block the transmission of ultraviolet and visible (UV–vis) light. This can be a desirable attribute since the films can provide more protection to foodstuff from light, especially UV radiation, which can cause lipid oxidation in the food products [60,69].

3.4. Crystallinity of PHB/PHBV/RHF Films

Figure 5 displays the DSC thermograms of the film samples obtained during the heating (Figure 5a) and cooling (Figure 5b) scans. Table 3 displays the main thermal transitions obtained from the DSC curves. One can observe that melting in the PHB/RHF film took place in two peaks, which were noted as Tm1 and Tm2, whereas the unfilled PHB/PHBV film melted in a single peak. The double-melting peak phenomenon can be ascribed to the formation of crystalline structures with dissimilar lamellae thicknesses or the presence of crystallite blocks with different degrees of perfection [30]. The first peak originates from the melting of the PHB fraction that crystallized previously during the film formation, while in the second peak contributes the melting of the recrystallized PHB fraction during heating. In this context, other works have reported that melt-extruded films of neat PHB melt in 170–175 °C range [70,71]. Then, one can consider that the presence of the RHF fillers restricted the chain-folding process of PHB during crystallization.
Interestingly, the incorporation into PHB/RHF of low contents of PHBV, that is, 5 wt %, yielded the film sample with the highest melting peak, that is, ~172 °C, whereas it also suppressed the double-melting peak behavior. This observation points out that the co-addition of 5 wt % PHBV and 10 wt % RHF enhanced the crystallization of PHB molecules, which was further supported by the shift of Tc from 113.1 °C, for the PHB/RHF film, to 118.9 °C, for the PHB/PHBV5/RHF film. The addition of higher contents of PHBV, however, led to films with two melting peaks. The first melting peak can be related to the PHBV-rich fraction, which was seen in the 158–166 °C range, whereas the second one corresponds to PHB melting, observed in 168–174 °C range. This result points out that fully miscibility was only attained in the composite blends containing low amounts of PHBV, that is, 5–10 wt %. At higher PHBV contents, the composite films formed a two-phase system and the Tm values were also reduced. Thus, the films produced with PHBV contents higher than 10 wt % showed a two phase crystallization, having a liquid–liquid separation at temperatures higher than 165 °C. One assumes that in these samples, due to the fact that the HV content in PHBV was relatively high, that is, 20 mol %, phase segregation preceded co-crystallization. One can also observe that the melting enthalpy of the first peak decreased while that of the second peak increased with the increase of the PHBV content in the blend. This observation indicates that crystallization occurred mainly in the PHB-rich regions by which the HV units were partially included into the PHB lattice and also induced some defects in the biopolymer crystals [72]. In this regards, different studies on the crystallization behavior of PHB/PHBV blends have indicated that their degree of miscibility decreases gradually as the HV in the copolyester increases. For instance, blends of PHB with PHBV were fully miscible over up to approximately 60 wt % of copolyester with a HV content of 18.4 mol % [73]. On the contrary, blends consisting of PHB and PHBV of high contents of HV, that is, 76 mol %, showed no depression of the melting point of each PHA, indicating total immiscibility [74]. In another work, Saito et al. [75] studied the competition between co-crystallization and phase segregation in blends of PHB and PHBV with different HV contents. The authors observed almost perfect co-crystallization in blends based on PHB and PHBV with 9 mol % HV, whereas HV contents >15 mol % induced phase segregation, that is, increased the percentage of PHBV that segregates from the growth front of crystals prior to co-crystallization.

3.5. Thermal Stability of PHB/PHBV/RHF Films

TGA curves are plotted in Figure 6 and the most relevant properties obtained from the curves are listed in Table 4. In relation to RHF, one can observe three main weight losses. The first one occurred around 100 °C, showing a mass loss of ~2%, which corresponds to the moisture released from the lignocellulosic filler. Following the TGA curve of RHF, the second and main degradation peak started at approximately 180 °C and ended at 340 °C with an average mass loss of ~47%. This weight loss includes the degradation of low-MW components, mainly hemicellulose, followed by cellulose degradation. This zone represents the main devolatilization step of biomass pyrolysis and it is referred as the “active pyrolysis zone” since mass loss rate is high [76]. After this, RHF gradually degraded over a range of temperature from approximately 340 °C to 650 °C with a mass loss of ~16%, which can be seen as a tailing in both TGA and DTG curves. This mass loss is related to the degradation of lignin and it is called “passive pyrolysis zone” since the percentage of mass loss is smaller and the mass loss rate is also much lower compared to that in the second zone [76]. Indeed, when the temperature reached 650 °C, the degradation rates were no longer significant as most volatiles were already pyrolyzed. The rest was converted into char and gases, resulting in a residual mass of nearly 33%, which can be related to the high silicate content in rice husk [47].
Thermal degradation of the unfilled PHB/PHBV film occurred through a single and sharp degradation step that ranged from about 250 °C to 290 °C. PHA degradation typically follows a random chain scission model of the ester linkage that involves a cis-elimination reaction of β-CH and a six-member ring transition to form crotonic acid and its oligomers [77]. The presence of RHF reduced both the onset degradation temperature (T5%) and degradation temperature (Tdeg) by approximately 10 °C and 15 °C, respectively, and also generated a low-intensity second mass centered around 330 °C. This reduction in thermal stability can be mainly ascribed to the lower degradation temperature of the lignocellulosic particles as well as to the presence of some remaining water. One can also observe that all composite films presented a similar thermal degradation profile though certain stability increase was attained for the highest PHBV contents. For instance, the T5% value increased from 242.5 °C, for the PHB/RHF film, to 257.2 °C, for the PHB/PHBV50/RHF film. Similarly, the values of Tdeg also increased from 270 °C, for the PHB/RHF film, to 275.5 °C, for the PHB/PHBV50/RHF film. The improvement achieved in the thermal stability can be ascribed to the high purity of the PHBV incorporated in the blend, based on the previous selection of the optimal purification route [58], which has also been reported to be more thermally stable than PHB [78]. Finally, the amount of residual mass was in the 3–4% range, being mainly ascribed to the formed char from RHF.

3.6. Mechanical Properties of PHB/PHBV/RHF Films

Figure 7 shows the tensile stress–strain curves, obtained at room temperature, for the thermo-compressed films. The mechanical results, in terms of tensile modulus (E), tensile strength at yield (σy), elongation at break (εb), and toughness are summarized in Table 5. One can see that all the films were relatively stiff and also brittle due to the intrinsically high crystallinity of PHB, which is derived from secondary crystallization that occurs post-processing with age [79]. This mechanical brittleness habitually represents an obstacle to the practical applications of PHB, for instance in packaging. The presence of RHF further promoted rigidity and brittleness of PHB, showing E and εb values of 3025 MPa and 1.1%, respectively. One can also observe that the unfilled PHB/PHBV film showed the lowest E value, that is, 1785 MPa, and also the highest values of εb and toughness, that is, 8.4% and 1.9 mJ/m3, respectively. Whereas the mechanical properties of the PHB/RHF and PHB/PHBV5/RHF films were relatively similar, the incorporation of 10 wt % PHBV into PHB/RHF successfully resulted in a film with very balanced performance in terms of mechanical strength and ductility. In particular, the PHB/PHBV10/RHF film showed moderate values of E and σy, that is, 2508 MPa and 30.4 MPa, respectively, and a 3-fold increase in εb and remarkable higher toughness in comparison to the PHB/RHF film. However, the films produced at higher PHBV contents, that is, 20–50 wt %, showed lower and relatively similar performance. These results indicate that PHBV can successfully produce a toughening effect on the PHB matrix at low or intermediate contents, which can be ascribed to the high solubility achieved in these films samples as described above during the crystallinity analysis. The resultant lower stiffness and higher flexibility of these PHBV-containing films can be attributed to the presence of dislocations, crystal strain, and smaller crystallites in the PHB/PHBV soluble regions due to the insertion of the HV units into the PHB lattice, which acted as defects in the HB crystals [80].

3.7. Barrier Performance of PHB/PHBV/RHF Films

Table 6 finally gathers the WVP and LP values of the PHB-based films. The barrier performance to water vapor is one of the main parameters of application interest in packaging, while d-limonene is a commonly used standard compound to test mass transport of aromas. The PHB/RHF film showed somewhat higher WVP values than compression-molded PHB films previously reported by our group, that is, 1.7–1.75 × 10−15 kg·m/s·m2·Pa [81,82]. The lower water vapor barrier attained for the here-prepared green composite films can be related to the high tendency of the lignocellulosic fillers to adsorb water since transport of water vapor molecules is mainly a diffusivity-driven property in PHAs due to their intrinsically low hydrophilic character [83]. The incorporation of biowaste derived PHBV into PHB/RHF increased slightly the WVP values in the films. At low PHBV contents, however, the barrier performance of the composite films was relatively similar since the samples showed variations close to the detection limit of the technique, with deviations oscillating in the 6.0–7.5 × 10−16 kg·m/s·m2·Pa range. Only the films with the highest PHBV contents, that is, 30 wt % and 50 wt %, displayed a significant decrease in the water barrier properties, which was still within the same order of magnitude. The barrier drop observed can be attributed to the higher contribution of the biomass derived PHBV, which results in an overall decrease in molecular order and crystallinity, the presence of defects and discontinuities across the polymer morphology as well as certain plasticization induced by the remaining biomass impurities of PHBV with consequent increase in free volume [67].
Similar to WVP, one can observe that the incorporation of PHBV tended to decrease the barrier properties to d-limonene of the PHB/RHF composite films. This aroma compound, as opposed to moisture, is a strong plasticizing component for PHAs, thus, solubility plays a more important role in permeability than diffusion. The LP increase observed suggests that the presence of PHBV favored an increased sorption of d-limonene in the film. Indeed, our previous studies dealing with PHA materials have shown that the LP value of films made of PHBV with 12 mol % HV is two order of magnitude higher, that is, 1.99 × 10−13 kg·m/s·m2·Pa [84], than that of neat PHB films, that is, 1.95 × 10−15 kg·m/s·m2·Pa [82]. In any case, the present results indicate that the incorporation of up to 20 wt % PHBV does not significantly affect the barrier properties of the PHB-based films against water or aroma. In a more packaging oriented application context, the composite films containing low amounts of PHBV present WVP values in the same order of magnitude than those films of petroleum-based PET, that is, 2.30 × 10−15 kg·m/s·m2·Pa [85], which is typically used in medium-barrier applications. In terms of d-limonene, the here-prepared PHB/PHBV/RHF films are two order of magnitude more barrier than compression-molded PET films, that is, 1.17 × 10−13 kg·m/s·m2·Pa [81].

4. Discussion

Results showed an optimum morphology with a regular distribution of RHF, tightly bonded and with absence of gap along the PHB matrix due to the use of reactive compatibilizers. The biowaste derived PHBV also showed a good miscibility with the PHB/RHF composite system, in particular at the lowest contents, that is, 5–10 wt %. At higher concentrations, however, a two-phases system was attained, indicating that crystallization occurred mainly in the PHB-rich regions. The incorporation of PHBV also increased the thermal stability of PHB/RHF, increasing the processing window of the films. With respect to the mechanical properties, contents in the 5–10 wt % range of PHBV yielded films with a more balanced performance in terms of strength and ductility, counteracting the stiffness and fragility induced by RHF. Finally, although the incorporation of PHBV increased the permeability of the films, the water vapor barrier properties of the PHB/PHBV/RHF films still remained in values close to those of PET films, whereas they still presented a high barrier to aroma.

5. Conclusions

The use of natural fillers and biopolymers obtained from agro-food waste currently represents a sustainable alternative to petroleum-based materials. The green composite films prepared herein are potential candidates to be used in rigid packaging for low and medium barrier applications, being processable by current conventional machinery. The valorization of agro-food waste, as well as the relative preservation of physicochemical properties, supports the use of purified biosustainably produced PHBV in the food packaging industry to develop more cost-effective PHA-based articles.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization was devised by L.C. and S.T.-G.; Methodology, B.M.-R. and A.A.; Writing—original draft preparation, B.M.-R.; Writing—review and editing, S.T.-G.; Supervision, L.C., S.T.-G., and J.M.L.; Project Administration, J.M.L.

Funding

This research was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities (MICIU) program number AGL2015-63855-C2-1-R and by the EU H2020 projects YPACK (reference number 773872) and ResUrbis (reference number 730349).

Acknowledgments

B.M.-R. and S.T.-G. acknowledge MICIU for her FPI grant (BES-2016-077972) and his Juan de la Cierva-Incorporación contract (IJCI-2016-29675), respectively. The authors also thank the Joint Unit in Polymers Technology between IATA–CSIC and PIMA-Universitat Jaume I.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rehm, B.H.A. Polyester synthases: Natural catalysts for plastics. Biochem. J. 2003, 376, 15–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alaerts, L.; Augustinus, M.; VanAcker, K. Impact of bio-based plastics on current recycling of plastics. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Smith, R. Biodegradable Polymers for Industrial Applications; Woodhead: Lisle, IL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cava, D.; Giménez, E.; Gavara, R.; Lagaron, J.M. Comparative performance and barrier properties of biodegradable thermoplastics and nanobiocomposites versus PET for food packaging applications. J. Plast. Film. Sheeting 2006, 22, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reis, K.; Pereira, J.; Smith, A.; Carvalho, C.; Wellner, N.; Yakimets, I. Characterization of polyhydroxybutyrate-hydroxyvalerate (PHB-HV)/maize starch blend films. J. Food Eng. 2008, 89, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nduko, J.M.; Matsumoto, K.; Taguchi, S. Biological lactate-polymers synthesized by one-pot microbial factory: Enzyme and metabolic engineering. Biobased Monomers Polym. Mater. 2012, 1105, 213–235. [Google Scholar]
  7. Philip, S.; Keshavarz, T.; Roy, I. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: Biodegradable polymers with a range of applications. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2007, 82, 233–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Keshavarz, T.; Roy, I. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: Bioplastics with a green agenda. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2010, 13, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Blunt, W.; Levin, D.B.; Cicek, N. Bioreactor Operating Strategies for Improved Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Productivity. Polymers 2018, 10, 1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kourmentza, C.; Plácido, J.; Venetsaneas, N.; Burniol-Figols, A.; Varrone, C.; Gavala, H.N.; Reis, M.A. Recent Advances and Challenges towards Sustainable Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Production. Bioengineering 2017, 4, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jacquel, N.; Lo, C.W.; Wu, H.S.; Wei, Y.H.; Wang, S.S. Solubility of Solubility of polyhydroxyalkanoates by experiment and thermodynamic correlations. AIChE J. 2007, 53, 2704–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Domingos, J.M.; Puccio, S.; Martinez, G.A.; Amaral, N.; Reis, M.A.; Bandini, S.; Fava, F.; Bertin, L. Cheese whey integrated valorisation: Production, concentration and exploitation of carboxylic acids for the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates by a fed-batch culture. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 336, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Samorì, C.; Abbondanzi, F.; Galletti, P.; Giorgini, L.; Mazzocchetti, L.; Torri, C.; Tagliavini, E. Extraction of polyhydroxyalkanoates from mixed microbial cultures: Impact on polymer quality and recovery. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 189, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, S.Y. Plastic bacteria? Progress and prospects for polyhydroxyalkanoate production in bacteria. Trends Biotechnol. 1996, 14, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Torres-Giner, S.; Montanes, N.; Fombuena, V.; Boronat, T.; Sanchez-Nacher, L. Preparation and characterization of compression-molded green composite sheets made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) reinforced with long pita fibers. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2018, 37, 1305–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zini, E.; Scandola, M. Green composites: An overview. Polym. Compos. 2011, 32, 1905–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Saheb, D.N.; Jog, J.P. Natural fiber polymer composites: A review. Adv. Polym. Technol. 1999, 18, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Joshi, S.V.; Drzal, L.T.; Mohanty, A.K.; Arora, S. Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites? Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2004, 35, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. La Mantia, F.P.; Morreale, M. Green composites: A brief review. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2011, 42, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Khalil, H.P.S.A.; Bhat, A.H.; Yusra, A.F.I. Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 963–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ndazi, B.S.; Karlsson, S. Characterization of hydrolytic degradation of polylactic acid/rice hulls composites in water at different temperatures. Express Polym. Lett. 2011, 5, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yussuf, A.A.; Massoumi, I.; Hassan, A. Comparison of polylactic acid/kenaf and polylactic acid/rice husk composites: The influence of the natural fibers on the mechanical, thermal and biodegradability properties. J. Polym. Environ. 2010, 18, 422–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Quiles-Carrillo, L.; Montanes, N.; Garcia-Garcia, D.; Carbonell-Verdu, A.; Balart, R.; Torres-Giner, S. Effect of different compatibilizers on injection-molded green composite pieces based on polylactide filled with almond shell flour. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 147, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Quiles-Carrillo, L.; Montanes, N.; Sammon, C.; Balart, R.; Torres-Giner, S. Compatibilization of highly sustainable polylactide/almond shell flour composites by reactive extrusion with maleinized linseed oil. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 111, 878–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liminana, P.; García-Sanoguera, D.; Quiles-Carrillo, L.; Balart, R.; Montanes, N. Development and characterization of environmentally friendly composites from poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) and almond shell flour with different compatibilizers. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 144, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Montava-Jordà, S.; Quiles-Carrillo, L.; Richart, N.; Torres-Giner, S.; Montanes, N. Enhanced Interfacial Adhesion of Polylactide/Poly(ε-caprolactone)/Walnut Shell Flour Composites by Reactive Extrusion with Maleinized Linseed Oil. Polymers 2019, 11, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Garcia-Garcia, D.; Carbonell-Verdu, A.; Jordá-Vilaplana, A.; Balart, R.; Garcia-Sanoguera, D.; Garcia-Garcia, D.; Carbonell-Verdu, A.; Jordá-Vilaplana, A.; Garcia-Sanoguera, D. Development and characterization of green composites from bio-based polyethylene and peanut shell. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Torres-Giner, S.; Hilliou, L.; Melendez-Rodriguez, B.; Figueroa-Lopez, K.; Madalena, D.; Cabedo, L.; Covas, J.; Vicente, A.; Lagaron, J. Melt processability, characterization, and antibacterial activity of compression-molded green composite sheets made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) reinforced with coconut fibers impregnated with oregano essential oil. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 17, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Quiles-Carrillo, L.; Montanes, N.; Lagaron, J.M.; Balart, R.; Torres-Giner, S. On the use of acrylated epoxidized soybean oil as a reactive compatibilizer in injection-molded compostable pieces consisting of polylactide filled with orange peel flour. Polym. Int. 2018, 67, 1341–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Montava-Jordà, S.; Torres-Giner, S.; Ferrandiz-Bou, S.; Quiles-Carrillo, L.; Montanes, N. Development of Sustainable and Cost-Competitive Injection-Molded Pieces of Partially Bio-Based Polyethylene Terephthalate through the Valorization of Cotton Textile Waste. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ferrero, B.; Fombuena, V.; Fenollar, O.; Boronat, T.; Balart, R. Development of natural fiber-reinforced plastics (NFRP) based on biobased polyethylene and waste fibers from Posidonia oceanica seaweed. Polym. Compos. 2015, 36, 1378–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Aprianti, E.; Shafigh, P.; Bahri, S.; Farahani, J.N. Supplementary cementitious materials origin from agricultural wastes—A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 74, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Adam, F.; Appaturi, J.N.; Iqbal, A. The utilization of rice husk silica as a catalyst: Review and recent progress. Catal. Today 2012, 190, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Adam, F.; Kandasamy, K.; Balakrishnan, S. Iron incorporated heterogeneous catalyst from rice husk ash. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 304, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, Q.; Zhang, B.; Quan, H.; Yam, R.C.; Yuen, R.K.; Li, R.K.; Yuen, K.K.R. Flame retardancy of rice husk-filled high-density polyethylene ecocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2009, 69, 2675–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Panthapulakkal, S.; Law, S.; Sain, M. Enhancement of processability of rice husk filled high-density polyethylene composite profiles. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2005, 18, 445–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nascimento, G.; Cechinel, D.; Piletti, R.; Mendes, E.; Paula, M.; Riella, H.G.; Fiori, M. Effect of Different Concentrations and Sizes of Particles of Rice Husk Ash-RHS in the Mechanical Properties of Polypropylene. Mater. Sci. Forum 2010, 660, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Verheyen, S.; Blaton, N.; Kinget, R.; Kim, H.-S. Thermogravimetric analysis of rice husk flour filled thermoplastic polymer composites. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2004, 76, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Battegazzore, D.; Bocchini, S.; Alongi, J.; Frache, A.; Marino, F. Cellulose extracted from rice husk as filler for poly(lactic acid): Preparation and characterization. Cellulose 2014, 21, 1813–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bertini, F.; Canetti, M.; Cacciamani, A.; Elegir, G.; Orlandi, M.; Zoia, L. Effect of ligno-derivatives on thermal properties and degradation behavior of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-based biocomposites. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2012, 97, 1979–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Boitt, A.P.W.; Barcellos, I.O.; Alberti, L.D.; Bucci, D.Z. Evaluation of the Influence of the Use of Waste from the Processing of Rice in Physicochemical Properties and Biodegradability of PHB in Composites. Polimeros 2014, 24, 640–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Moura, A.; Bolba, C.; Demori, R.; Lima, L.P.F.C.; Santana, R.M. Effect of Rice Husk Treatment with Hot Water on Mechanical Performance in Poly(hydroxybutyrate)/Rice Husk Biocomposite. J. Polym. Environ. 2018, 26, 2632–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sánchez-Safont, E.L.; Aldureid, A.; Lagarón, J.M.; Gamez-Perez, J.; Cabedo, L. Biocomposites of different lignocellulosic wastes for sustainable food packaging applications. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 145, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Borah, J.S.; Kim, D.S. Recent development in thermoplastic/wood composites and nanocomposites: A review. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2016, 33, 3035–3049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rowell, R.M.; Young, R.A.; Rowell, J.K.I. Paper and Composites from Agro-Based Resources; CRC press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  46. Lu, J.Z.; Wu, Q.; McNabb, H.S. Chemical coupling in wood fiber and polymer composites: A review of coupling agents and treatments. Wood Fiber Sci. 2000, 32, 88–104. [Google Scholar]
  47. George, J.; Sreekala, M.S.; Thomas, S. A review on interface modification and characterization of natural fiber reinforced plastic composites. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2001, 41, 1471–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chan, C.M.; Vandi, L.-J.; Pratt, S.; Halley, P.; Richardson, D.; Werker, A.; Laycock, B. Mechanical properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/wood flour composites: Effect of interface modifiers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hao, M.; Wu, H. Effect of in situ reactive interfacial compatibilization on structure and properties of polylactide/sisal fiber biocomposites. Polym. Compos. 2018, 39, E174–E187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dhavalikar, R.; Xanthos, M. Parameters affecting the chain extension and branching of PET in the melt state by polyepoxides. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 87, 643–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Quiles-Carrillo, L.; Montanes, N.; Jorda-Vilaplana, A.; Balart, R.; Torres-Giner, S. A comparative study on the effect of different reactive compatibilizers on injection-molded pieces of bio-based high-density polyethylene/polylactide blends. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wei, L.; McDonald, A.G.; Stark, N.M. Grafting of bacterial polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) onto cellulose via in situ reactive extrusion with dicumyl peroxide. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 1040–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ahmad, E.E.M.; Luyt, A.S. Effects of organic peroxide and polymer chain structure on mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of sisal fiber reinforced polyethylene composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 125, 2216–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nogellova, Z.; Kokta, B.V.; Chodak, I. A composite LDPE/wood flour crosslinked by peroxide. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A 1998, 35, 1069–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gu, R.; Sain, M.; Kokta, B.V. Evaluation of wood composite additives in the mechanical property changes of PE blends. Polym. Compos. 2015, 36, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Joseph, K.; Thomas, S.; Pavithran, C. Effect of chemical treatment on the tensile properties of short sisal fibre-reinforced polyethylene composites. Polymer 1996, 37, 5139–5149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mokoena, M.A.; Djoković, V.; Luyt, A.S. Composites of linear low density polyethylene and short sisal fibres: The effects of peroxide treatment. J. Mater. Sci. 2004, 39, 3403–3412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Melendez-Rodriguez, B.; Castro-Mayorga, J.L.; Reis, M.A.M.; Sammon, C.; Cabedo, L.; Torres-Giner, S.; Lagaron, J.M. Preparation and characterization of electrospun food biopackaging films of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) derived from fruit pulp biowaste. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2018, 2, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Figueroa-Lopez, K.; Andrade-Mahecha, M.; Torres-Vargas, O. Development of antimicrobial biocomposite films to preserve the quality of bread. Molecules 2018, 23, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kanatt, S.R.; Rao, M.; Chawla, S.; Sharma, A. Active chitosan–polyvinyl alcohol films with natural extracts. Food Hydrocoll. 2012, 29, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Scaglioni, P.T.; Badiale-Furlong, E. Rice husk as an adsorbent: A new analytical approach to determine aflatoxins in milk. Talanta 2016, 152, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Schneider, L.T.; Bonassa, G.; Alves, H.J.; Meier, T.R.W.; Frigo, E.P.; Teleken, J.G. Use of rice husk in waste cooking oil pretreatment. Environ. Technol. 2019, 40, 594–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rosa, S.M.L.; Santos, E.F.; Ferreira, C.A.; Nachtigall, S.M.B. Studies on the properties of rice-husk-filled-PP composites: Effect of maleated PP. Mater. Res. 2009, 12, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Torres-Giner, S.; Montanes, N.; Boronat, T.; Quiles-Carrillo, L.; Balart, R. Melt grafting of sepiolite nanoclay onto poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) by reactive extrusion with multi-functional epoxy-based styrene-acrylic oligomer. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 84, 693–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Formela, K.; Zedler, Ł.; Hejna, A.; Tercjak, A. Reactive extrusion of bio-based polymer blends and composites—Current trends and future developments. Express Polym. Lett. 2018, 12, 24–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wei, L.; Stark, N.M.; McDonald, A.G. Interfacial improvements in biocomposites based on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) bioplastics reinforced and grafted with α-cellulose fibers. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 4800–4814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Martínez-Abad, A.; Cabedo, L.; Oliveira, C.S.; Hilliou, L.; Reis, M.; Lagarón, J.M. Characterization of polyhydroxyalkanoate blends incorporating unpurified biosustainably produced poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 42633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Maruhashi, Y.; Iida, S. Transparency of polymer blends. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2001, 41, 1987–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Figueroa-Lopez, K.J.; Vicente, A.A.; Reis, M.A.M.; Torres-Giner, S.; Lagaron, J.M. Antimicrobial and antioxidant performance of various essential oils and natural extracts and their incorporation into biowaste derived poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) layers made from electrospun ultrathin fibers. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ollier, R.P.; D’Amico, D.A.; Schroeder, W.F.; Cyras, V.P.; Alvarez, V.A. Effect of clay treatment on the thermal degradation of PHB based nanocomposites. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 163, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. De Matos Costa, A.R.; Santos, R.M.; Ito, E.N.; de Carvalho, L.H.; Canedo, E.L. Melt and cold crystallization in a poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) blend. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yoshie, N.; Asaka, A.; Inoue, Y. Cocrystallization and phase segregation in crystalline/crystalline polymer blends of bacterial copolyesters. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 3770–3779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Organ, S.J. Phase separation in blends of poly(hydroxybutyrate) with poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate): Variation with blend components. Polymer 1994, 35, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kumagai, Y.; Doi, Y. Enzymatic degradation of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-based blends: Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/poly(ethylene oxide) blend. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1992, 35, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Saito, M.; Inoue, Y.; Yoshie, N. Cocrystallization and phase segregation of blends of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate). Polymer 2001, 42, 5573–5580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mansaray, K.G.; Ghaly, A.E. Thermogravimetric analysis of rice husks in an air atmosphere. Energy Sources 1998, 20, 653–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bugnicourt, E. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA): Review of synthesis, characteristics, processing and potential applications in packaging. Express Polym. Lett. 2014, 8, 791–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Li, S.D.; He, J.D.; Yu, P.H.; Cheung, M.K. Thermal degradation of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) as studied by TG, TG–FTIR, and Py–GC/MS. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 89, 1530–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Laycock, B.; Halley, P.; Pratt, S.; Werker, A.; Lant, P. The chemomechanical properties of microbial polyhydroxyalkanoates. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 536–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Orts, W.J.; Marchessault, R.H.; Bluhm, T.L.; Hamer, G.K. Observation of strain-induced β form in poly(β-hydroxyalkanoates). Macromolecules 1990, 23, 5368–5370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sanchez-Garcia, M.D.; Gimenez, E.; Lagaron, J.M. Novel PET nanocomposites of interest in food packaging applications and comparative barrier performance with biopolyester nanocomposites. J. Plast. Film Sheeting 2007, 23, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cherpinski, A.; Torres-Giner, S.; Cabedo, L.; Lagaron, J.M. Post-processing optimization of electrospun submicron poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) fibers to obtain continuous films of interest in food packaging applications. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2017, 34, 1817–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Razumovskii, L.; Iordanskii, A.; Zaikov, G.; Zagreba, E.; McNeill, I. Sorption and diffusion of water and organic solvents in poly(β-hydroxybutyrate) films. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1994, 44, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sanchez-Garcia, M.D.; Gimenez, E.; Lagarón, J.M. Morphology and barrier properties of solvent cast composites of thermoplastic biopolymers and purified cellulose fibers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 71, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lagarón, J.M. Multifunctional and Nanoreinforced Polymers for Food Packaging; Woodhead Publishing: Lisle, IL, USA, 2011; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
Materials 12 02152 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) As-received flakes of rice husk; (b) rice husk flour (RHF).
Figure 1. (a) As-received flakes of rice husk; (b) rice husk flour (RHF).
Materials 12 02152 g001
Materials 12 02152 g002 550
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of rice husk flour (RHF) taken at (a) 50× with scale marker of 100 µm and (b) 10,000× with scale marker of 5 µm; (c) particle size histogram of RHF.
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of rice husk flour (RHF) taken at (a) 50× with scale marker of 100 µm and (b) 10,000× with scale marker of 5 µm; (c) particle size histogram of RHF.
Materials 12 02152 g002
Materials 12 02152 g003 550
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the cross-sections of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF): (a) PHB/RHF; (b) PHB/PHBV; (c) PHB/PHBV5/RHF; (d) PHB/PHBV10/RHF; (e) PHB/PHBV20/RHF; (f) PHB/PHBV30/RHF; (g) PHB/PHBV50/RHF. Images were taken at 1000× with scale markers of 50 µm (left column) and at 2500× with scale markers of 20 µm (right column).
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the cross-sections of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF): (a) PHB/RHF; (b) PHB/PHBV; (c) PHB/PHBV5/RHF; (d) PHB/PHBV10/RHF; (e) PHB/PHBV20/RHF; (f) PHB/PHBV30/RHF; (g) PHB/PHBV50/RHF. Images were taken at 1000× with scale markers of 50 µm (left column) and at 2500× with scale markers of 20 µm (right column).
Materials 12 02152 g003
Materials 12 02152 g004 550
Figure 4. Visual aspect of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF): (a) PHB/RHF; (b) PHB/PHBV; (c) PHB/PHBV5/RHF; (d) PHB/PHBV10/RHF; (e) PHB/PHBV20/RHF; (f) PHB/PHBV30/RHF; (g) PHB/PHBV50/RHF.
Figure 4. Visual aspect of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF): (a) PHB/RHF; (b) PHB/PHBV; (c) PHB/PHBV5/RHF; (d) PHB/PHBV10/RHF; (e) PHB/PHBV20/RHF; (f) PHB/PHBV30/RHF; (g) PHB/PHBV50/RHF.
Materials 12 02152 g004
Materials 12 02152 g005 550
Figure 5. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves during (a) heating and (b) cooling of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF).
Figure 5. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves during (a) heating and (b) cooling of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF).
Materials 12 02152 g005
Materials 12 02152 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and (b) first derivative (DTG) curves of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF).
Figure 6. (a) Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and (b) first derivative (DTG) curves of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF).
Materials 12 02152 g006
Materials 12 02152 g007 550
Figure 7. Tensile stress–strain curves of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF).
Figure 7. Tensile stress–strain curves of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF).
Materials 12 02152 g007
Table
Table 1. Set of formulations prepared according to the weight content (wt %) of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF) in which triglycidyl isocyanurate (TGIC) and dicumyl peroxide (DCP) were added as parts per hundred resin (phr) of PHB/PHBV/RHF composite.
Table 1. Set of formulations prepared according to the weight content (wt %) of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF) in which triglycidyl isocyanurate (TGIC) and dicumyl peroxide (DCP) were added as parts per hundred resin (phr) of PHB/PHBV/RHF composite.
SamplePHB (wt %)PHBV (wt %)RHF (wt %)TGIC (phr)DCP (phr)
PHB/RHF9001010.25
PHB/PHBV9010010.25
PHB/PHBV5/RHF8551010.25
PHB/PHBV10/RHF80101010.25
PHB/PHBV20/RHF70201010.25
PHB/PHBV30/RHF60301010.25
PHB/PHBV50/RHF40501010.25
Table
Table 2. Optical properties of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF).
Table 2. Optical properties of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF).
Filma*b*L*∆E*TO
PHB/RHF−0.04 ± 0.01 a11.82 ± 0.03 a80.20 ± 0.02 a-9.08 ± 0.07 a0.107 ± 0.03 a
PHB/PHBV−0.25 ± 0.03 b1.94 ± 0.02 b86.40 ± 0.04 b-8.48 ± 0.03 b0.099 ± 0.02 a
PHB/PHBV5/RHF0.44 ± 0.05 c14.60 ± 0.02 c78.05 ± 0.03 c3.55 ± 0.05 a9.06 ± 0.05 a0.111 ± 0.03 a
PHB/PHBV10/RHF0.52 ± 0.04 c14.84 ± 0.07 c77.62 ± 0.03 d4.01 ± 0.06 b9.91 ± 0.04 c 0.116 ± 0.05 a
PHB/PHBV20/RHF0.56 ± 0.05 c15.28 ± 0.06 d77.56 ± 0.05 d4.39 ± 0.04 c10.05 ± 0.03 d 0.116 ± 0.02 a
PHB/PHBV30/RHF0.70 ± 0.07 d15.36 ± 0.05 d77.29 ± 0.06 e4.64 ± 0.03 d10.18 ± 0.08 e0.117 ± 0.04 a
PHB/PHBV50/RHF1.12 ± 0.08 e16.17 ± 0.03 e76.36 ± 0.04 f5.92 ± 0.06 e10.17 ± 0.05 e0.113 ± 0.04 a
a*: red/green coordinates (+a red, −a green); b*: yellow/blue coordinates (+b yellow, −b blue); L*: Luminosity (+L luminous, −L dark); ∆E*: color differences; T: transparency; O: opacity. a–f Different letters in the same column indicate a significant difference among the samples (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Main thermal parameters of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF) in terms of: crystallization temperature (Tc), normalized enthalpy of crystallization (∆Hc), melting temperature (Tm), and normalized melting enthalpy (∆Hm).
Table 3. Main thermal parameters of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF) in terms of: crystallization temperature (Tc), normalized enthalpy of crystallization (∆Hc), melting temperature (Tm), and normalized melting enthalpy (∆Hm).
FilmTc (°C)∆Hc (J/g)Tm1 (°C)Tm2 (°C)∆Hm (J/g)
PHB/RHF113.1 ± 0.6 a70.2 ± 0.2 a160.5 ± 0.8 a167.2 ± 0.9 a71.8 ± 2.3 a
PHB/PHBV113.3 ± 0.3 a73.3 ± 0.4 b165.1 ± 0.3 b-76.9 ± 1.4 b
PHB/PHBV5/RHF118.9 ± 0.6 b59.8 ± 1.8 c171.9 ± 1.5 c-63.7 ± 4.8 c
PHB/PHBV10/RHF110.9 ± 0.2 c60.1 ± 3.9 c162.6 ± 1.1 d168.3 ± 0.4 a63.4 ± 1.6 c
PHB/PHBV20/RHF115.4 ± 0.6 d78.0 ± 4.1 d166.0 ± 1.5 b173.3 ± 0.3 b61.4 ± 0.3 c
PHB/PHBV30/RHF113.2 ± 0.6 a72.7 ± 4.7 d162.6 ± 0.7 d173.9 ± 0.1 c59.4 ± 2.2 c
PHB/PHBV50/RHF107.7 ± 0.6 e64.8 ± 0.8 c158.4 ± 1.1 e171.0 ± 0.8 d53.8 ± 0.1 d
a–e Different letters in the same column indicate a significant difference among the samples (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 4. Main thermal parameters of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF) in terms of: onset temperature of degradation (T5%), degradation temperature (Tdeg), mass loss at Tdeg, and residual mass at 800 °C.
Table 4. Main thermal parameters of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF) in terms of: onset temperature of degradation (T5%), degradation temperature (Tdeg), mass loss at Tdeg, and residual mass at 800 °C.
FilmT5% (°C)Tdeg (°C)Mass Loss (%)Residual Mass (%)
RHF228.9 ± 1.5 a335.2 ± 0.7 a28.5 ± 0.8 a33.1 ± 0.3 a
PHB/RHF242.5 ± 1.2 b270.0 ± 0.5 b 67.4 ± 0.7 b3.1 ± 1.3 b
PHB/PHBV252.6 ± 1.9 c282.8 ± 0.4 c69.4 ± 1.5 b0.6 ± 0.1 c
PHB/PHBV5/RHF242.5 ± 1.5 b268.2 ± 0.5 d65.4 ± 0.3 c3.5 ± 0.2 b
PHB/PHBV10/RHF247.1 ± 1.3 d270.0 ± 0.5 b63.9 ± 0.4 d3.1 ± 0.8 b
PHB/PHBV20/RHF247.5 ± 1.4 d274.6 ± 0.6 e69.8 ± 1.2 b3.3 ± 0.9 b
PHB/PHBV30/RHF253.5 ± 1.7 c275.5 ± 0.6 e61.7 ± 0.2 e3.2 ± 0.2 b
PHB/PHBV50/RHF257.2 ± 1.6 e275.5 ± 0.6 e61.5 ± 0.3 e3.8 ± 0.4 b
a–e Different letters in the same column indicate a significant difference among the samples (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 5. Mechanical properties of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF) in terms of: tensile modulus (E), tensile strength at yield (σy), elongation at break (εb), and toughness.
Table 5. Mechanical properties of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF) in terms of: tensile modulus (E), tensile strength at yield (σy), elongation at break (εb), and toughness.
FilmE (MPa)σy (MPa)εb (%)Toughness (mJ/m3)
PHB *~2900 a~37 a~4 a-
PHB/RHF3025 ± 101 b26.7 ± 2.7 b1.1 ± 0.1 b0.1 ± 0.1 a
PHB/PHBV1785 ± 129 c38.9 ± 2.0 a8.4 ± 1.1 c1.9 ± 0.3 b
PHB/PHBV5/RHF2985 ± 119 a,b27.2 ± 1.1 b1.4 ± 0.1 d0.3 ± 0.1 a
PHB/PHBV10/RHF2508 ± 207 d30.4 ± 2.7 b3.3 ± 1.3 a0.8 ± 0.3 c
PHB/PHBV20/RHF2830 ± 193 a,b,d26.5 ± 2.5 b1.2 ± 0.3 b,d0.1 ± 0.1 a
PHB/PHBV30/RHF2765 ± 201 a,b,d23.9 ± 0.7 b1.3 ± 0.2 b,d0.2 ± 0.1 a
PHB/PHBV50/RHF2649 ± 104 d19.5 ± 3.0 c1.3 ± 0.4 b,d0.2 ± 0.1 a
* Average mechanical properties for compression-molded films of neat PHB [79]. a–d Different letters in the same column indicate a significant difference among the samples (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 6. Water vapor permeability (WVP) and d-limonene permeability (LP) of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF).
Table 6. Water vapor permeability (WVP) and d-limonene permeability (LP) of the thermo-compressed films made of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and rice husk flour (RHF).
FilmWVP × 1015 (kg·m/m2·Pa·s)LP × 1015 (kg·m/m2·Pa·s)
PHB *1.75 a1.95 a
PHB/RHF4.52 ± 0.38 b2.58 ± 1.35 a
PHB/PHBV3.27 ± 0.15 c2.04 ± 0.19 a
PHB/PHBV5/RHF4.55 ± 0.75 b2.16 ± 0.54 a
PHB/PHBV10/RHF5.03 ± 0.64 b3.10 ± 0.65 a
PHB/PHBV20/RHF5.36 ± 0.69 b3.38 ± 0.63 a
PHB/PHBV30/RHF6.01 ± 0.60 b3.72 ± 0.32 a
PHB/PHBV50/RHF7.46 ± 0.90 b5.04 ± 1.50 a
* Barrier data for compression-molded PHB films reported in literature [82]. a–c Different letters in the same column indicate a significant difference among the samples (p < 0.05).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Melendez-Rodriguez, B.; Torres-Giner, S.; Aldureid, A.; Cabedo, L.; Lagaron, J.M. Reactive Melt Mixing of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate)/Rice Husk Flour Composites with Purified Biosustainably Produced Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-co-3-Hydroxyvalerate). Materials 2019, 12, 2152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12132152

AMA Style

Melendez-Rodriguez B, Torres-Giner S, Aldureid A, Cabedo L, Lagaron JM. Reactive Melt Mixing of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate)/Rice Husk Flour Composites with Purified Biosustainably Produced Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-co-3-Hydroxyvalerate). Materials. 2019; 12(13):2152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12132152

Chicago/Turabian Style

Melendez-Rodriguez, Beatriz, Sergio Torres-Giner, Abdulaziz Aldureid, Luis Cabedo, and Jose M. Lagaron. 2019. "Reactive Melt Mixing of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate)/Rice Husk Flour Composites with Purified Biosustainably Produced Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-co-3-Hydroxyvalerate)" Materials 12, no. 13: 2152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12132152

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop