Next Article in Journal
Effect of Different Hydration Time on Carbonation Degree and Strength of Steel Slag Specimens Containing Zeolite
Next Article in Special Issue
Incorporation of Waste Glass as an Activator in Class-C Fly Ash/GGBS Based Alkali Activated Material
Previous Article in Journal
A Simple Approach for Generating Random Aggregate Model of Concrete Based on Laguerre Tessellation and Its Application Analyses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spalling Resistance of Fiber-Reinforced Ultra-High-Strength Concrete Subjected to the ISO-834 Standard Fire Curve: Effects of Thermal Strain and Water Vapor Pressure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on Physical Properties of Mortar for Section Restoration Using Calcium Nitrite and CO2 Nano-Bubble Water

1
Daegu Gyeongbuk Branch, Korea Testing & Research Institute, Daegu 41516, Korea
2
School of Architecture, Civil Environment and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
3
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kitami Institute of Technology, Hokkaido 090-8507, Japan
4
Intelligent Construction Automation Center, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
5
BUKUK (Neutralization & Prevention of Structure Hazard System), Gyeonggi-do 17001, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(17), 3897; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13173897
Submission received: 6 August 2020 / Revised: 27 August 2020 / Accepted: 1 September 2020 / Published: 3 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research of Mechanical Behavior of Cement and Concrete Composites)

Abstract

:
This study investigated the physical properties of section-restoration mortar with calcium nitrite (Ca(NO2)2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) nanobubble mixing water to develop materials and methods for the repair and reinforcement of cracks in reinforced concrete (RC) structures. As the calcium nitrite content increased, the generation rate and generated amount of nitrite-based hydration products also increased, owing to the rapid reaction between NO2 ions in calcium nitrite and C3A(Al2O3). Further, the reaction with C3S and C2S was accelerated, thereby increasing the generation rates of Ca(OH)2 and C-S-H. The large amount of Ca2+ ions in these hydration products reacted with CO32− ions in CO2 nanobubble water, thereby increasing the generation of calcite-based CaCO3 in the cement matrix. This appears to have affected strength development and durability improvement via the densification of the structure. These results suggest that the performance of polymer cement mortar for repairing concrete structures can be improved if calcium nitrite and CO2 nanobubble water are properly combined and applied.

1. Introduction

In recent years, global efforts have focused on reducing industrial carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. In this light, South Korea has aimed to reduce its industrial CO2 emissions. The construction industry accounts for approximately 40% of total industrial CO2 emissions [1]. Further, cement production and concrete manufacturing account for approximately 5% of these emissions. Therefore, it is essential to reduce CO2 emissions in the construction industry. One way of doing so is to properly maintain the existing structures through repair and reinforcement instead of building new structures. For this purpose, repair and reinforcement methods with reduced environmental loads must be developed for extending the service life of concrete structures.
Concrete is widely used in the construction industry. The tensile strength of concrete is significantly lower than its compressive strength. In particular, cracks inevitably occur in buildings owing to various problems in the mix design and construction process [2]. Microcracks in buildings are generally not considered significant structural problems [3]. Nonetheless, microcracks facilitate the penetration of chlorides and CO2 that are highly likely to critically degrade the structural stability of reinforced concrete (RC) structures [4]. Cracks in RC structures also negatively impact the appearance of these structures [5]. Therefore, crack formation must be prevented. Further, materials and methods for crack repair and reinforcement must be developed to realize high-performance RC structures and sustainable buildings.
A previous study noted that in a moist environment, concrete containing small cracks showed a self-healing phenomenon in which part of the crack was filled [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. This phenomenon occurred due to the rehydration of cement particles and the precipitation of CaCO3; specifically, CaCO3 was generated by the reaction between Ca2+ in concrete and CO32− dissolved in water. Further, a strong self-healing effect was observed when CO2 nanobubble water was used [2]. Calcium nitrite (Ca(NO2)2) is widely used as the main component in antifreeze admixtures. Increasing the calcium nitrite content accelerates the hydration reaction of C3A and C3S (both of which are components of cement) and thereby increases the generation of ettringite-based hydrate (Aft). Further, the generation of nitrite-based hydrates in large quantities owing to the reaction between C3A(Al2O3) and NO2 increases the initial strength of concrete [15].
In this light, the present study investigates the physical properties of section-restoration mortar with calcium nitrite and CO2 nanobubble mixing water to develop materials and methods for the repair and reinforcement of cracks that occur in RC structures.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Plan

Table 1 and Table 2 show the experimental plan and mortar mix proportion of this study, respectively. The design strength was set in accordance with KS F 4042 [16]. Through a preliminary mixing experiment, the water/binder ratio (W/M(B + S)) was determined to be 16%. Experiments were conducted by adding 0%, 1%, 3%, and 5% calcium nitrite relative to the weight of cement. Ordinary tap water and CO2 nanobubble water were used as mixing water, and eight types of mortar specimens were prepared.
The table flow, compressive strength, flexural strength, length change rate, and carbonation depth were measured. For microstructure analysis, the porosity was analyzed, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was conducted. The results of these experiments were used to examine whether the polymer cement mortar used for repairing concrete structures satisfied the KS F 4042 quality criteria (Table 3) [16].

2.2. Materials and CO2 Nanobubble Water

2.2.1. Materials

Polymer cement mortar, in which an expansive admixture and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers were premixed as repair/reinforcement materials, was used in the experiments. Ordinary tap water (temperature: 20 °C, no impurities) and CO2 nanobubble water (particle diameter ~50 nm, pH adjusted to ~4.5 (slightly acidic)) produced using a nanobubble device (HACK FB11, Tokyo, Japan) were used as mixing water.

2.2.2. Equipment and Process to Generate CO2 Nanobubble Water

Figure 1 shows the equipment and process used to generate CO2 nanobubble water. A nanobubble generator connected to a CO2 source was operated in a water tank filled with tap water. The gas pump generated a negative pressure to pressurize the mixing header. CO2 saturation nanobubbles (particle diameter ~50 nm, pH adjusted to ~4.5 (slightly acidic)) generated by cavitation were then discharged through the foam nozzle into the water tank to produce CO2 nanobubble water [17,18]. These nanobubbles generally have small buoyancy and negative surface charges on the order of tens of microvolts; therefore, they repel and do not easily stick to each other, consequently lasting for a longer duration in water than microbubbles [19].

2.3. Experimental Parameters

In this study, the flow test was conducted to determine the workability of polymer cement mortar for repairing concrete structures. Physical properties such as strength, length change rate, and carbonation depth were tested to evaluate quality performances like densification and shrinkage behavior of the repair material, including calcium nitrite and CO2 nanobubbles as a mixing water. The porosity was analyzed to clarify the cause of densification through the change of the pore volume in each case over time. In addition, SEM analysis was performed to clarify the type and size of hydration products caused by the densification of the structure.

2.3.1. Flow

For the flow of mortar (a non-hardening property) the experimental flow table of KS L 5111 [20] was used. The flow was measured immediately as well as 30 and 60 min after mixing in proportion with KS F 2476 [21].

2.3.2. Compressive and Flexural Strength

Prismatic mortar specimens with a size of 40 × 40 × 160 mm were fabricated for the strength test in accordance with KS F 4042 [16]. They were demolded at two days of age and subjected to standard water curing at 20 °C. Their flexural strength was measured at 3, 7, and 28 days of age by using the central loading method and a universal testing machine (UH-F1000 kNX, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) in accordance with KS F 2408 [22]. To test the compressive strength, specimens that were fractured after measuring their flexural strength were used. After mounting the specimens in a compression mold (40 × 40 × 40 mm), the compressive strength was measured at 3, 7, and 28 days of age in accordance with KS F 2405 [23]. Figure 2 shows the setup for measuring the compressive and flexural strengths.

2.3.3. Length Change Rate

Prismatic mortar specimens (40 × 40 × 160 mm) in accordance with KS F 4042 [16] were used to test the length change rate. The specimens were demolded at two days of age and subjected to water curing at (20 ± 3) °C for five days. They were then cured in a constant temperature and humidity chamber at (20 ± 3) °C and (60 ± 5)% RH. The length change rate was measured for predetermined ages by using the dial gauge method of KS F 2424 [24].

2.3.4. Carbonation Depth

The carbonation depth was measured by the accelerated carbonation test of KS F 2596 [25]. The acceleration conditions were at a temperature of (20 ± 2) °C, a humidity of (60 ± 5)%, and a CO2 concentration of (5 ± 0.2)%. The specimens were sealed with aluminum tape except at the top surface to block the infiltration of CO2. A solution of 1% phenolphthalein was sprayed on the split specimens, and the depth of the part that turned red was measured at 10 mm intervals by using a Vernier caliper.

2.3.5. Porosity and SEM Analysis

Porosity measurements and SEM analysis were conducted only for specimens with 0% and 5% calcium nitrite to investigate the properties of tap water and CO2 nanobubble water according to the calcium nitrite content.
As shown in Figure 3, samples were collected from the specimens fractured after measuring the strength at 3 and 28 days of age. The collected samples were used in the experiment after being immersed in acetone for more than four hours to stop the hydration reaction.
The samples used for porosity measurements were oven-dried at 60 °C. Mercury was then pressurized at 0–60,000 psi by using a porosity analyzer (AutoPore IV 9520, Norcross, GA, USA), and the pore size and cumulative pore volume of each specimen were measured from the amount of penetration. SEM analysis was conducted using the SNE-3200M device (SEC, Suwon, Korea), and the collected powder-type samples were coated with platinum. They were then observed at 3000× magnification at an acceleration voltage of 15 kV.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Flow

Figure 4 shows the flow test results. Regardless of whether tap water or CO2 nanobubble water was used, specimens with calcium nitrite tended to show high flow values. The flow did not seem to show any relation to the type of mixing water or the calcium nitrite content.

3.2. Compressive and Flexural Strength

Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the compressive and flexural strength results of the specimens when using tap water and CO2 nanobubble water according to the calcium nitrite content and age. For both types of mixing water, the compressive and flexural strengths increased with an increase in the calcium nitrite content. This was because NO2 ions in calcium nitrite rapidly reacted with C3A(Al2O3), a component of cement, to increase the generation rate and amount of nitrite-based hydration products [26]. The CN0 specimen with CO2 nanobubble water showed somewhat higher compressive and flexural strengths because this water was initially produced at 30 °C, which was higher than the temperature for other specimens.
A comparison of the compressive and flexural strength results with the use of tap water and CO2 nanobubble water revealed a larger strength improvement effect with the latter. This result was similar to a previously reported result on the compressive strength of cement mortar using CO2 nanobubble water [27]. It seemed attributable to the increased generation of calcite-based CaCO3 in the cement matrix, as a large amount of Ca2+ ions was generated through the aforementioned accelerated the reaction between calcium nitrite, and cement reacted with the CO32− ions in the CO2 nanobubble water. This led to strength improvement via the densification of the structure [28,29,30].
For calcium nitrite content of 3% or higher, both the compressive and the flexural strengths satisfied the quality criteria of 20 and 6 MPa, respectively, specified in KS F 4042 [16] regarding the compressive and flexural strengths of polymer cement mortar required to repair concrete structures.
This indicated that a certain strength improvement effect can be expected if the CO2 nanobubble water and calcium nitrite contents are properly adjusted in consideration of site conditions at the time of the section restoration.

3.3. Length Change Rate

Figure 7 shows the length change rate measurement results of specimens that used tap water and CO2 nanobubble water according to the calcium nitrite content and age. As the age increased, the shrinkage also increased owing to drying and the rapid hydration reaction at early ages.
For tap water, the length change rate was higher with calcium nitrite contents of 1% or 3% than with contents of 0% or 5%. For CO2 nanobubble water, the length change rate decreased with calcium nitrite contents of 3% or higher. In particular, for calcium nitrite contents of 5% or higher, the length change rate decreased sharply regardless of the type of mixing water used. A shrinkage reduction effect of 0.05–0.08% was confirmed at 56 days of age compared to the specimen without calcium nitrite.

3.4. Carbonation Depth

Figure 8 shows the carbonation depth measurement results of specimens that used tap water and CO2 nanobubble water according to the calcium nitrite content. With both types of mixing water, the carbonation depth decreased as the calcium nitrite content increased.
As mentioned in Section 3.2, this appears to be because the internal structure became denser with increasing calcium nitrite content as nitrite-based hydration products increased and, in particular, a large amount of ettringite was generated owing to the accelerated reaction between C3A(Al2O3) in cement and the NO2 ions in calcium nitrite. In particular, when CO2 nanobubble water was used, an accelerated reaction occurred between the CO32− ions in CO2 nanobubble water and the Ca+ ions in cement. Therefore, the supply of CO32− ions alone caused the carbonation reaction, thereby increasing the generation of CaCO3 in the specimen. As a result, CO2 nanobubble water has a higher carbonation suppression effect owing to the densification of the structure [28,29,30]. In particular, when 5% calcium nitrite was added, the quality criterion of KS F 4042 [16] for the carbonation depth of polymer cement mortar for repairing concrete structures (less than 2 mm carbonation depth at four weeks of age) could be met.
This indicates that carbonation can be suppressed through the proper use of CO2 nanobubble water and calcium nitrite. Both are judged to be helpful in improving the performance of the section-restoration mortar via the densification of the structure of the cement matrix.

3.5. Porosity

Figure 9 and Figure 10 show the pore size distribution and cumulative pore volume results of specimens that used tap water and CO2 nanobubble water according to the calcium nitrite content and age. As the age increased, the cumulative pore volume decreased, indicating that the specimen structure became denser, thereby affecting the strength development. Overall, the addition of calcium nitrite slightly reduced the pore size and significantly reduced the cumulative pore volume.
In particular, when CO2 nanobubble water was used, the cumulative pore volume was smaller than with the use of tap water. This effect increased when calcium nitrite was used. As with strength development, this appears to be because the structure became denser through the accelerated reaction between C3A(Al2O3) in cement and the NO2 ions in calcium nitrite as well as the reaction between the CO32− ions in CO2 nanobubble water and the Ca+ ions in cement. In addition, it is judged as a result of reducing the pore volume and size due to the formation of carbonate in the pores by the reaction between the water and the CO32− ions inside the pores [31,32,33].

3.6. SEM

Figure 11 shows the SEM observation results of specimens that used tap water and CO2 nanobubble water according to the calcium nitrite content. Each hydration product was estimated by comparing the crystal structures obtained in this study with the crystal forms and sizes of hydration products confirmed in previous studies.
As the age increased, a wider distribution of hydration products, such as C-S-H gel and Ca(OH)2, was observed. In the case of the specimens without calcium nitrite, ettringite with its acicular brittle fracture behavior was distributed with monosulfate at an early age. In the case of the specimens with calcium nitrite, monosulfate was partially observed along with sulfuric acid (SO42−)-based ettringite on the C3A surface of cement. Meanwhile, calcite was partially observed in the specimens that used CO2 nanobubble water containing CO32− ions. It appeared that CaCO3 (mainly calcite) was observed because the addition of calcium nitrite increased the generation rate of C-S-H gel and Ca(OH)2, and the CO32− ions in CO2 nanobubble water were adsorbed on the Ca2+ ions in the generated hydration products. In particular, nitrite-based hydration products and calcite-based CaCO3 were generated in large quantities in the specimens that used calcium nitrite and CO2 nanobubble water, indicating that the physical performance was improved through the densification of the structure.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the physical properties of section-restoration mortar using calcium nitrite and CO2 nanobubble water as mixing water were investigated. The following conclusions were derived:
  • The flow values of the specimens with calcium nitrite tended to be high. No special tendency according to the type of mixing water and the calcium nitrite content was seen. When 5% calcium nitrite was added, the length change rate sharply decreased.
  • As the calcium nitrite content increased, strength and durability also increased. In particular, the use of CO2 nanobubble water effectively increased the strength and reduced the carbonation depth and porosity.
  • As the calcium nitrite content increased, the generation rate and generated amount of nitrite-based hydration products increased owing to the rapid reaction between the NO2 ions in calcium nitrite and the C3A(Al2O3) in cement.
  • A large amount of Ca2+ ions from Ca(OH)2 and C-S-H gel, which were generated through the accelerated reaction between calcium nitrite and cement, reacted with the CO32− ions in the CO2 nanobubble water, thereby increasing the generation of calcite-based CaCO3 in the cement matrix. This appears to have affected the strength development and durability improvement via the densification of the structure. The densification of the matrix appears to reduce the pore volume and affect strength development as well as durability improvement.
These results suggest that the performance of polymer cement mortar for repairing concrete structures can be improved if calcium nitrite and CO2 nanobubble water are properly combined and applied.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.C. (Hyeonggil Choi) and H.C. (Heesup Choi); Methodology, H.C. (Hyeonggil Choi); Investigation, Resources, D.L.; Writing—original draft preparation, H.-j.K.; Writing—review and Editing, H.C. (Hyeonggil Choi); Supervision, H.C. (Heesup Choi); Visualization, B.L.; Funding acquisition, D.-E.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2018R1A5A1025137).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cheng, C.C.; Pouffary, S.; Svenningsen, N.; Callaway, J.M. The Kyoto Protocol, the Clean Development Mechanism, and the Building and construction SECTOR: A Report Prepared for the UNEP Sustainable Buildings and Construction Initiative; UNEP. Division of Technology, Industry and Economics: Paris, France, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  2. Choi, H.; Choi, H.; Inoue, M.; Sengoku, R. Control of the polymorphism of calcium carbonate produced by self-healing in the cracked part of cementitious materials. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Otsuki, N.; Kamada, T.; Imamoto, K.; Osada, K. Practical Guideline for Investigation, Repair and Strengthening of Cracked Concrete Structure -2013-; Japan Concrete Institute: Tokyo, Japan, 2013. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Jacobsen, S.; Marchand, J.; Boisvert, L. Effect of cracking and healing on chloride transport in OPC concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 1996, 26, 869–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Toledo Filho, R.D.; Ghavami, K.; Sanjuán, M.A.; England, G.L. Free. Restrained and drying shrinkage of cement mortar composites reinforced with vegetable fibres. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2005, 27, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Menon, R.R.; Luo, J.; Chen, X.; Zhou, H.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, G.; Zhang, N.; Jin, C. Screening of fungi for potential application of self-healing concrete. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Han, S.; Choi, E.K.; Park, W.; Yi, C.; Chung, N. Effectiveness of expanded clay as a bacteria carrier for self-healing concrete. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2019, 62, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Magaji, A.; Yakubu, M.; Wakawa, Y.M. A review paper on self healing concrete. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2019, 8, 47–54. [Google Scholar]
  9. Choi, Y.; Oh, S.; Kim, C.; Nam, E. A Study on Crack Healing Properties of Cement Composites Mixed with Self-healing Microcapsules. J. Korea Inst. Struct. Maint. Insp. 2020, 23, 113–121. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shin, D.; Muhammad, H.; Min, K.; Lee, K.; Lee, J. Evaluation of Self-Healing Performance for Mortar Beams Containing Self-Healing Materials. J. Korea Inst. Struct. Maint. Insp. 2020, 24, 67–73. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, H.J.; Peng, C.F.; Tang, C.W.; Chen, Y.T. Self-Healing Concrete by Biological Substrate. Materials 2019, 12, 4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Xu, J.; Wang, X. Self-healing of concrete cracks by use of bacteria-containing low alkali cementitious material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 167, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Palin, D.; Wiktor, V.; Jonkers, H.M. A bacteria-based self-healing cementitious composite for application in low-temperature marine environments. Biomimetics 2017, 2, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Edvardsen, C. Water permeability and autogenous healing of cracks in concrete. ACI Mater. J. 1999, 96, 448–454. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ramachanran, V.S. Concrete Admixture Handbook; Noyes Publications: Park Ridge, NJ, USA, 1995; pp. 741–799. [Google Scholar]
  16. Korean Industrial Standards. Polymer Modified Cement Mortar for Maintenance in Concrete Structure, KS F 4042; Korean Standards Association: Seoul, Korea, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dockar, D.; Borg, M.; Reese, J. Mechanical stability of surface nanobubbles. Langmuir 2018, 35, 9325–9333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Guo, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Hu, B.; Lei, Z.; Kobayashi, M.; Zhang, Z. Effects of nanobubble water on the growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus 1028 and its lactic acid production. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 30760–30767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Takahashi, M.; Chiba, K.; Li, P. Free-radical generation from collapsing microbubbles in the absence of a dynamic stimulus. J. Phys. Chem. 2007, 111, 1343–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Korean Industrial Standards. Flow Table for Use in Test of Hydraulic Cement; KS L 5111; Korean Standards Association: Seoul, Korea, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. Korean Industrial Standards. Standard Test Method for Polymer-Modified CEment Mortar; KS F 2476; Korean Standards Association: Seoul, Korea, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  22. Korean Industrial Standards. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete; KS F 2408; Korean Standards Association: Seoul, Korea, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  23. Korean Industrial Standards. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Concrete; KS F 2405; Korean Standards Association: Seoul, Korea, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  24. Korean Industrial Standards. Standard Test Method for Length Change of Mortar and Concrete; KS F 2424; Korean Standards Association: Seoul, Korea, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  25. Korean Industrial Standards. Method for Measuring Carbonation Depth of Concrete; KS F 2596; Korean Standards Association: Seoul, Korea, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  26. Choi, H.; Inoue, M.; Choi, H.; Kim, J.; Sudoh, Y.; Kwon, S.; Yoneyama, A. Physicochemical study on the strength development characteristics of cold weather concrete using a nitrite–nitrate based accelerator. Materials 2019, 12, 2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Han, J.G.; Lee, S.H.; Na, J.J.; Hong, G.G.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.M. Effect of nano-bubble water for the compressive strength of cement mortar using in pile foundation. Korean Soc. Civil. Eng. 2012, 10, 1090–1093. [Google Scholar]
  28. Choi, H.; Inoue, M. Self-healing of hardened cement paste affected by additional Ca2+ and CO32− ions with temperature control. J. Mater. 2020, 13, 012022. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee, S.; Kim, H.; Lim, Y.; Kim, D.; Park, B. Effect of Na2SO4 on autogenous healing in initial cracking of blast furnace slag cement paste. J. Korea Concr. Inst. 2019, 31, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, W.; Lee, H.; Ahn, S.; Lee, K. Influence of Exposure Environmental Conditions on the Crack Healing Performance of Self-healing Repair Mortar Specimens. J. Korean Recycl. Constr. Resour. Inst. 2018, 6, 283–288. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen, Z.; Lee, H. Physicochemical Properties of Cement Paste Containing Mg(OH)2Cured by CO2 curing Method. J. Korea Inst. Build. Constr. 2018, 18, 203–210. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wu, B.; Ye, G. Development of porosity of cement paste blended with supplementary cementitious materials after carbonation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 145, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ashraf, W. Carbonation of cement-based materials: Challenges and opportunities. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 120, 558–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Equipment and process used to generate CO2 nanobubbles. (a) Depiction of the nanobubble device; (b) behavior of nanobubbles in water.
Figure 1. Equipment and process used to generate CO2 nanobubbles. (a) Depiction of the nanobubble device; (b) behavior of nanobubbles in water.
Materials 13 03897 g001
Figure 2. Pictures of the strength tests, with (a) the compressive strength test and (b) the flexural strength test.
Figure 2. Pictures of the strength tests, with (a) the compressive strength test and (b) the flexural strength test.
Materials 13 03897 g002
Figure 3. Specimen sampling for SEM.
Figure 3. Specimen sampling for SEM.
Materials 13 03897 g003
Figure 4. Flow test results: (a) result with tap water; (b) result with nanobubble water.
Figure 4. Flow test results: (a) result with tap water; (b) result with nanobubble water.
Materials 13 03897 g004
Figure 5. Compressive strength test results: (a) result with tap water; (b) result with nanobubble water.
Figure 5. Compressive strength test results: (a) result with tap water; (b) result with nanobubble water.
Materials 13 03897 g005
Figure 6. Flexural strength test results: (a) result with tap water; (b) result with nanobubble water.
Figure 6. Flexural strength test results: (a) result with tap water; (b) result with nanobubble water.
Materials 13 03897 g006
Figure 7. Length change rate of mortar: (a) result with tap water; (b) result with nanobubble water.
Figure 7. Length change rate of mortar: (a) result with tap water; (b) result with nanobubble water.
Materials 13 03897 g007
Figure 8. Carbonation depth: (a) result with tap water; (b) result with nanobubble water.
Figure 8. Carbonation depth: (a) result with tap water; (b) result with nanobubble water.
Materials 13 03897 g008
Figure 9. Incremental intrusion results: (a) result with tap water; (b) result with nanobubble water.
Figure 9. Incremental intrusion results: (a) result with tap water; (b) result with nanobubble water.
Materials 13 03897 g009
Figure 10. Cumulative intrusion results: (a) result with tap water; (b) result with nanobubble water.
Figure 10. Cumulative intrusion results: (a) result with tap water; (b) result with nanobubble water.
Materials 13 03897 g010
Figure 11. SEM (3000 × magnification): (a) result with tap water; (b) result with nanobubble water.
Figure 11. SEM (3000 × magnification): (a) result with tap water; (b) result with nanobubble water.
Materials 13 03897 g011
Table 1. Experimental plan.
Table 1. Experimental plan.
ItemValues
Experimental variables and levelW/M (%)16
Ca(NO2)2 dosage 1CN0 *, CN1, CN3, CN5 *
Mixing water typeTap water (TW), Nanobubble water (NW)
Evaluation items
Flow
Compressive strength (3, 7, 28 days)
Flexural strength (3, 7, 28 days)
Length change
Carbonation depth (4, 8, 12 days)
Porosity *
Scanning electron microscopy micrograph (SEM) *
1 CNx: x = Amount of Ca(NO2)2 (Binder × wt%). * Porosity and SEM analysis were conducted only for CN0 and CN5.
Table 2. Mix proportion of mortar.
Table 2. Mix proportion of mortar.
W/M 1 (%)B:S 2Binder (wt%)
CementCSAResinAnhydrous GypsumPVA FiberSuperplasticizerViscosity Agent
161:1.4589.56.61.51.20.60.580.04
1 M: = B + S, 2 B: Binder, S: Sand.
Table 3. Quality criteria (KS F 4042 [16]).
Table 3. Quality criteria (KS F 4042 [16]).
Evaluation ItemsQuality Criteria
Compressive strength (N/mm2)More than 6.0
Flexural strength (N/mm2)More than 20.0
Carbonation depth (mm)More than 2.0

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, H.-j.; Choi, H.; Choi, H.; Lee, B.; Lee, D.; Lee, D.-E. Study on Physical Properties of Mortar for Section Restoration Using Calcium Nitrite and CO2 Nano-Bubble Water. Materials 2020, 13, 3897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13173897

AMA Style

Kim H-j, Choi H, Choi H, Lee B, Lee D, Lee D-E. Study on Physical Properties of Mortar for Section Restoration Using Calcium Nitrite and CO2 Nano-Bubble Water. Materials. 2020; 13(17):3897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13173897

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Ho-jin, Hyeonggil Choi, Heesup Choi, Bokyeong Lee, Dongwoo Lee, and Dong-Eun Lee. 2020. "Study on Physical Properties of Mortar for Section Restoration Using Calcium Nitrite and CO2 Nano-Bubble Water" Materials 13, no. 17: 3897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13173897

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop