Figure 1.
Sensitivity of systems with degenerated order parameters. (a) The azimuthal orientation of a weather vane is degenerated so that it is responsive to aerodynamic torques. (b) Homeotropic texture. In the absence of surfaces and fields, orientation of the director field n would be arbitrary. Therefore, surfaces treated for homeotropic anchoring impose easily the uniform orientation n//z. (c) Director field n, symmetry C and order parameter d (or ) of the dowser texture. The group C contains three symmetry elements: the twofold axis C, the mirror plane and the mirror plane (x,y). By analogy with the weather vane, the dowser texture is sensitive in first order to fields such as a Poiseuille flow.
Figure 1.
Sensitivity of systems with degenerated order parameters. (a) The azimuthal orientation of a weather vane is degenerated so that it is responsive to aerodynamic torques. (b) Homeotropic texture. In the absence of surfaces and fields, orientation of the director field n would be arbitrary. Therefore, surfaces treated for homeotropic anchoring impose easily the uniform orientation n//z. (c) Director field n, symmetry C and order parameter d (or ) of the dowser texture. The group C contains three symmetry elements: the twofold axis C, the mirror plane and the mirror plane (x,y). By analogy with the weather vane, the dowser texture is sensitive in first order to fields such as a Poiseuille flow.
Figure 2.
Tropisms of the dowser texture. (
a) Electrotropism: coupling of the field
d, via flexo-electric polarisation, with the electric field
E [
8]. (
b) Rheotropism: hydrodynamic torque exerted on the field
d by a Poiseuille flow [
9]. (
c) Cuneitropism: coupling of the field
d with the thickness gradient
g [
7].
Figure 2.
Tropisms of the dowser texture. (
a) Electrotropism: coupling of the field
d, via flexo-electric polarisation, with the electric field
E [
8]. (
b) Rheotropism: hydrodynamic torque exerted on the field
d by a Poiseuille flow [
9]. (
c) Cuneitropism: coupling of the field
d with the thickness gradient
g [
7].
Figure 3.
Pair of dowsons, topological defects of the dowser field d. (a) View in polarising microscope. (b) The dowser field d(x,y) inferred from (a). (c,d) Monopoles in the 3D director field corresponding to the dowsons d+ and d−.
Figure 3.
Pair of dowsons, topological defects of the dowser field d. (a) View in polarising microscope. (b) The dowser field d(x,y) inferred from (a). (c,d) Monopoles in the 3D director field corresponding to the dowsons d+ and d−.
Figure 4.
Setup. (a) General view. (b) Lever-crankshaft system for modulation and control of the gap thickness. (c) Cross section through the sample. (d) Systems of ITO electrodes.
Figure 4.
Setup. (a) General view. (b) Lever-crankshaft system for modulation and control of the gap thickness. (c) Cross section through the sample. (d) Systems of ITO electrodes.
Figure 5.
Metastability of the dowser texture. (a) Coexistence of the dowser and homeotropic textures. (b) Disclination surrounding the homeotropic domain. (c) Nucleation and spontaneous expansion of a homeotropic domain inside a thin enough droplet with the dowser texture. (d) Spontaneous collapse of the homeotropic domain into a monopole driven by an adequate increase of the sample thickness h. (e,f) Nematic monopole resulting from the collapse of the disclination loop. Remark: Time scales in c and d are very different.
Figure 5.
Metastability of the dowser texture. (a) Coexistence of the dowser and homeotropic textures. (b) Disclination surrounding the homeotropic domain. (c) Nucleation and spontaneous expansion of a homeotropic domain inside a thin enough droplet with the dowser texture. (d) Spontaneous collapse of the homeotropic domain into a monopole driven by an adequate increase of the sample thickness h. (e,f) Nematic monopole resulting from the collapse of the disclination loop. Remark: Time scales in c and d are very different.
Figure 6.
Homeotropic ⇒ Dowser transformation accelerated by a streaming flow driven by oscillations of the glass slide. (a) Schematic representation of four stages of the method used for a rapid preparation of the dowser texture. (b) Series of eight pictures taken during the process (5CB).
Figure 6.
Homeotropic ⇒ Dowser transformation accelerated by a streaming flow driven by oscillations of the glass slide. (a) Schematic representation of four stages of the method used for a rapid preparation of the dowser texture. (b) Series of eight pictures taken during the process (5CB).
Figure 7.
Stability of homeotropic-in-dowser domains in Poiseuille flows. (
a) Spatio-temporal cross section showing the motion of a homeotropic-in-dowser domain. (
b) Homeotropic and dowser textures submitted to a Poiseuille flow. (
c) Stability diagram. Red crosses—experimental points extracted from the spatio-temporal cross sections such as the one in a. Blue crosses—experimental data from Figure 2G in ref. [
13]. Red plain line—fit to the Equation (
8). (5CB, h = 60
m).
Figure 7.
Stability of homeotropic-in-dowser domains in Poiseuille flows. (
a) Spatio-temporal cross section showing the motion of a homeotropic-in-dowser domain. (
b) Homeotropic and dowser textures submitted to a Poiseuille flow. (
c) Stability diagram. Red crosses—experimental points extracted from the spatio-temporal cross sections such as the one in a. Blue crosses—experimental data from Figure 2G in ref. [
13]. Red plain line—fit to the Equation (
8). (5CB, h = 60
m).
Figure 8.
Cuneitropism. (a) Radial dowser field with d//gradh. (b) -wall connecting the eccentric dowson d+ with the center of the radial dowser field. (d,e) Radial dowser field with a shrinking circular -wall. (c,f) Structures of -walls. (g) Mechanical model explaining the cuneitropism of the dowser texture.
Figure 8.
Cuneitropism. (a) Radial dowser field with d//gradh. (b) -wall connecting the eccentric dowson d+ with the center of the radial dowser field. (d,e) Radial dowser field with a shrinking circular -wall. (c,f) Structures of -walls. (g) Mechanical model explaining the cuneitropism of the dowser texture.
Figure 9.
The evidence for the polarisation of the dowser texture in 5CB: formation of a -wall upon application of the electric field to the sample containing one dowson d+. (a) Static texture in the presence of the electric field. (b) Formation of -walls after reversal of the electric field. (c) Formation of a -wall from two -walls. (d) Motion of the dowson d+ pulled by the -wall. (e) New static texture of the dowser field. (f–i) Evolution of the dowser field after the second reversal of the electric field.
Figure 9.
The evidence for the polarisation of the dowser texture in 5CB: formation of a -wall upon application of the electric field to the sample containing one dowson d+. (a) Static texture in the presence of the electric field. (b) Formation of -walls after reversal of the electric field. (c) Formation of a -wall from two -walls. (d) Motion of the dowson d+ pulled by the -wall. (e) New static texture of the dowser field. (f–i) Evolution of the dowser field after the second reversal of the electric field.
Figure 10.
Configurations of dowsons d+ and d− and their motions in electric field. Direction of forces
f indicated here are given by Equation (
36) with
. (
a) Definition of variables r,
and
. (
b–
j) Direction of the force action on dowsons in several configurations. (
k) Energy density (given in Equation (
33)) in the orthoradial configuration of the dowson d+.
Figure 10.
Configurations of dowsons d+ and d− and their motions in electric field. Direction of forces
f indicated here are given by Equation (
36) with
. (
a) Definition of variables r,
and
. (
b–
j) Direction of the force action on dowsons in several configurations. (
k) Energy density (given in Equation (
33)) in the orthoradial configuration of the dowson d+.
Figure 11.
Electric field-induced motion of a dowsons d+. The radial outward and radial inward configurations of the dowson are generated by diverging and converging Poiseuille flows. For the same direction of the electric field, the direction of motion of dowson is opposite for the outward and inward configurations. The motion of the dust particles is due to electro-osmotic flows. (MBBA).
Figure 11.
Electric field-induced motion of a dowsons d+. The radial outward and radial inward configurations of the dowson are generated by diverging and converging Poiseuille flows. For the same direction of the electric field, the direction of motion of dowson is opposite for the outward and inward configurations. The motion of the dust particles is due to electro-osmotic flows. (MBBA).
Figure 12.
Simultaneous evidence for the flexo-electric polarisation of the dowser texture and for the electro-osmotic flows in 5CB. (a,a’) Application of an electric field by the one-gap system of electrodes. Due to its flexo-electric polarisation, the dowser field d is aligned by the electric field E inside the gap. -walls are generated at edges of the gap because outside of the gap, the dowser field d is aligned in the opposite direction by the electro-osmotic flow v. (b) Transitory splitting of the -wall and motions of -walls due the reversal of the electric field. (c,c’) Alignment of the dowser field by the reversed electric field and electro-osmotic flow.
Figure 12.
Simultaneous evidence for the flexo-electric polarisation of the dowser texture and for the electro-osmotic flows in 5CB. (a,a’) Application of an electric field by the one-gap system of electrodes. Due to its flexo-electric polarisation, the dowser field d is aligned by the electric field E inside the gap. -walls are generated at edges of the gap because outside of the gap, the dowser field d is aligned in the opposite direction by the electro-osmotic flow v. (b) Transitory splitting of the -wall and motions of -walls due the reversal of the electric field. (c,c’) Alignment of the dowser field by the reversed electric field and electro-osmotic flow.
Figure 13.
Winding of the dowser field by a sequence of radial and dipolar flows. (a) One sequence of radial and dipolar flows appropriate for the winding process. (b) Generation of three -walls loops by three successive sequences of flows.
Figure 13.
Winding of the dowser field by a sequence of radial and dipolar flows. (a) One sequence of radial and dipolar flows appropriate for the winding process. (b) Generation of three -walls loops by three successive sequences of flows.
Figure 14.
Generation of dowsons equivalent to nematic monopoles. (a) Wound up dowser texture made of -walls. (b) Thinning of the -walls in a strong electric fields leads to their breaking. (c) Two rows of dowsons d+ and d− generated by breaking of the -walls. (d) Detailed views of the dowser field. (e) Mapping of the director field on the space of the nematic order parameter.
Figure 14.
Generation of dowsons equivalent to nematic monopoles. (a) Wound up dowser texture made of -walls. (b) Thinning of the -walls in a strong electric fields leads to their breaking. (c) Two rows of dowsons d+ and d− generated by breaking of the -walls. (d) Detailed views of the dowser field. (e) Mapping of the director field on the space of the nematic order parameter.
Figure 15.
Gadanken experiment: stabilisation of a dowsons pattern by tropisms of the dowser texture. (a) Topography of the gap thickness h(x,y) or of the electric potential U(x,y). (b) Dowser field d oriented by the corresponding thickness gradient or electric field . (c) Pattern of isogyres seen in polarising microscope.
Figure 15.
Gadanken experiment: stabilisation of a dowsons pattern by tropisms of the dowser texture. (a) Topography of the gap thickness h(x,y) or of the electric potential U(x,y). (b) Dowser field d oriented by the corresponding thickness gradient or electric field . (c) Pattern of isogyres seen in polarising microscope.
Figure 16.
Triplet of dowsons stabilised by a quadrupolar electric field. (a) Initial configuration. (a–f) Relaxation through annihilation of dowsons pairs. (f) Final triplet configuration stabilised by the electric field. In MBBA, the dowser field is antiparallel to the electric field.
Figure 16.
Triplet of dowsons stabilised by a quadrupolar electric field. (a) Initial configuration. (a–f) Relaxation through annihilation of dowsons pairs. (f) Final triplet configuration stabilised by the electric field. In MBBA, the dowser field is antiparallel to the electric field.
Figure 17.
Triplet and septet of dowsons. The septet configuration is stabilised by electro-osmotic flows which in MBBA are parallel to the electric field. (a) Triplet of dowsons. (b) Geometry of the electric field. (c) Septet of dowsons.
Figure 17.
Triplet and septet of dowsons. The septet configuration is stabilised by electro-osmotic flows which in MBBA are parallel to the electric field. (a) Triplet of dowsons. (b) Geometry of the electric field. (c) Septet of dowsons.
Figure 18.
Stable configurations of a dowsons’ triplet in a quadrupolar electric field. (a) Electric field generated by the system of four ITO electrodes. (b) The dowsons’ triplet in MBBA. The dowson d− is trapped in stagnation point of the electric field. (c) The same experiment with 5CB.
Figure 18.
Stable configurations of a dowsons’ triplet in a quadrupolar electric field. (a) Electric field generated by the system of four ITO electrodes. (b) The dowsons’ triplet in MBBA. The dowson d− is trapped in stagnation point of the electric field. (c) The same experiment with 5CB.
Figure 19.
Dowser field in an annular channel. (a) Cross section of the channel. (b) Homeotropic outward anchoring of the dowser field at the lateral wall of the channel. (c,e) Defect-less dowser fields with opposite curls. (d) Dowser field in the presence of a dowsons’ pair d+d−.
Figure 19.
Dowser field in an annular channel. (a) Cross section of the channel. (b) Homeotropic outward anchoring of the dowser field at the lateral wall of the channel. (c,e) Defect-less dowser fields with opposite curls. (d) Dowser field in the presence of a dowsons’ pair d+d−.