Next Article in Journal
Magnesium Oxychloride Cement Composites Lightened with Granulated Scrap Tires and Expanded Glass
Next Article in Special Issue
An Insight into the Correlation between Chemical Composition Changes of Aluminum-Iron-Polyphosphate Glasses and Thermal Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Melt-Spinning of an Intrinsically Flame-Retardant Polyacrylonitrile Copolymer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 13
Issue 21
10.3390/ma13214827
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Production of Soda Lime Glass Having Antibacterial Property for Industrial Applications

by
Barış Demirel
1,2,* and
Melek Erol Taygun
2
1
Sisecam Science, Technology and Design Center, 41400 Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(21), 4827; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214827
Submission received: 17 September 2020 / Revised: 21 October 2020 / Accepted: 23 October 2020 / Published: 28 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Glass and Glass-Ceramic Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study was aimed to produce and characterize the first commercial glass materials with enhanced antibacterial property using conventional melting method. For this purpose, typical container glass composition that contains some specific metal ions, such as silver, strontium, and copper, was used to obtain antibacterial glass samples using classical melting method. After the melting process, antibacterial tests and migration tests were applied to the glasses, and it was found that the glass doped with 2% Ag2O was the best composition. X-rays diffractometer (XRD), thermal expansion coefficient, density, refractive index, hardness, and elastic module results showed that the glass doped with 2% Ag2O was a suitable material as a container glass. High Temperature Melting Observation System studies were performed on the produced antibacterial glass composition, and it was found that the antibacterial glass can be produced in soda lime glass furnaces without changing any furnace design and production parameters. As a result of the characterization studies, it was concluded that the produced container glass doped with silver can be a good candidate for food and pharmaceutical products where bacterial growth is absolutely undesirable.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Glass is one of the most important material in human life. It can be used in different areas, such as windows, cars, home goods, food and drug packaging, with valuable features like being recyclable, easy to clean, durable, and easy to produce in different shapes and colors. Therefore, glass is an indispensable material in people’s daily lives [1].
On the other hand, the world population is increasing and at the same time, environmental pollution is becoming a bigger threat for humankind day by day. People contact with microorganisms in the ambient environment and this is one of the significant disease-causing factors. The factors such as changing living conditions, spending most of the time outside, changing eating habits, transport facilities, and international visiting cause to transfer microorganisms easily among individuals in public places and thus an increase in infectious diseases [2]. When the amount of microorganisms increases at a certain percentage, epidemics can occur depending on the intensity of infectious diseases. The well-being of individuals must be protected for a healthy society. Therefore, ensuring hygiene for the products used in the environment where we live and work, in other words, decontamination of microorganisms that can cause diseases has become important [3].
Scientists have been developing new methodologies to overcome this threat. There are many ways to struggle with bacteria and viruses. However, ensuring the presence of the ions, which have antibacterial effect, to prevent bacterial growth is an important one [4,5,6,7]. Some metal ions (i.e., silver, strontium, etc.) have functions to struggle bacteria and deactivate their enzymes, which are encouraged to be used in glass products [8,9,10,11,12,13]. There are many studies about ion-doped antibacterial bioactive glasses in the literature; however; none of these glasses are commercial glass products [14,15,16,17,18].
Some antibacterial commercial glass products have been found in the literature; however antibacterial property was gained to these materials using sol–gel coatings [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. These coatings peeled out from the surface of the glass materials after a while and the glass materials lost their antibacterial property. However, antibacterial glass materials obtained by classical melting method eliminate these problems. Overall, this study aims to investigate, produce, and characterize the first commercial glass materials with enhanced antibacterial property produced by classical melting method.

2. Experimental Procedure

2.1. Glass Composition and Melting

In this study, initially, it was decided to add silver, strontium, and copper ions, which have very strong antibacterial effect, to soda lime glass. As a model soda lime glass, a typical glass container composition was selected as the glass composition due to the increasing importance of antibacterial properties for food industry (Table 1) [30].
Silver (I) oxide (Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA, USA 99+%, metals basis), copper (II) oxide (Alfa Aesar, 99.0% min, powder), and strontium oxide (Alfa Aesar, 99.5%, metals basis) were added to glass batch in the percentages of 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2.5 by decreasing SiO2 and CaO amount. The antibacterial glass compositions are given in Table 2.
After determining the antibacterial glass compositions, 12 glass batches of about 120 g were prepared. The batches were melted at 1450 °C for 3 h using a platinum crucible followed by annealing at 550 °C for 1 h. After annealing, the glass samples seen in Figure 1 were obtained.

2.2. Characterization of Antibacterial Glasses

Antibacterial properties of glasses were evaluated against a Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli ATCC 25,922) according to the ISO 22196: 2011 standard method (Measurement of antibacterial activity on plastics and other nonporous surfaces). The control and test samples (50 mm × 50 mm) were initially cleaned and sterilized under UV irradiation for 2 h (each side for 1 h) and then inoculated with 100 μL of Mueller Hinton broth with 0.5% agar containing 2.5−10 × 105 cells/mL (Merck KGaA, Darmstad, Germany). Then, test inoculum was covered with a piece of sterile film (40 mm × 40 mm). The film was used to cover and to spread inoculum. After incubation at 35 °C for 24 h, sterile film together with agar was removed and placed into the phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solution. Enumeration of survivals was performed by pour plate culture method on plate count agar after incubation at 35 °C for 48 h. The number of viable bacteria for test and control samples were calculated using following equation, where N is the number of viable bacteria recovered per cm2 per test specimen; C is the average plate count for duplicate plates; D is the dilution factor for the plates counted; V is the volume, in mL, of PBS added to the specimen; and A is the surface area, in mm2, of the cover film. Each analysis was performed in quadruplicate.
N = 100 × C × D × D × V / A
Inactivation ratio (%) in bacterial count was calculated using following equation [31].
I n a c t i v a t i o n   r a t i o   % = 100   ×   N c o n t r o l − N t e s t N c o n t r o l
The release of ions from glasses (ISO 6486) was measured as a function of immersion time in acetic acid and water with the aid of inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-OES, Perkin Elmer Avio 200, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). The antibacterial glasses were tested according to 84/500/EEC Directive and BS 6748. According to the 84/500/EEC Directive and BS 6748 standard, the release of lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) from the inner surface of the glassware intended to come into contact with foodstuffs using 4% (v/v) acetic acid at 22 ± 2 °C and during 24 ± 0.5 h was determined by ICP-OES.
The amorphous structure of the obtained glasses was identified using an X-ray diffraction analyzer (PANalytical Empyrean XRD, Malvern, UK, 45 mA, 40 kV, Scan range: 10°–60°, Step size: 0.013°).
The energy levels of silver oxide, which is effective in antibacterial properties of glass, were determined by XPS analysis. Thermo Scientific K-Alpha spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for this analysis. The spectrometer has an aluminum anode (Al Kα = 1468.3 eV) at an electron takeoff angle of 90° (between the sample surface and the axis of the analyzer lens). A flood gun was used to avoid charging. Accelerated Ar ions at 3000 eV was used for 30 s to clean the top surface from any organic impurities. The spectra were recorded using an Avantage 5.9 data system.
PE Lambda 900/950 UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to determine the transmittance (% T), absorption (A) and reflection (% R) measurements of reference (nonantibacterial typical container glass) and antibacterial glasses. This device is a computer-controlled, double-beamed, dual-monochromator type spectrophotometer that is used to determine transmittance, absorption, and reflection measurement values in the ultraviolet–visible region–near infrared region of the spectrum, 185–3200 nm (nanometer) in the spectral range of 200–2500 nm when using the collector spheres. The UV WinLab software program, which is used to operate this device, allows the use of 4 different methods.
The densities of reference (nonantibacterial typical container glass) and antibacterial glasses were measured by Mettler Toledo Density Kit (Mettler Toledo, OH, USA) at room temperature using the principle of Archimedes and water as buoyancy liquid.
The thermal expansion coefficients of the reference and antibacterial glasses were detected using a dilatometer (NETZSCH DIL 402 PC, NETZSCH, Selb, Germany).
Hardness and reduced elastic modulus values were measured with nanoindenter (M1, NANOVEA, Irvine, CA, USA). The indentations were performed to maximum load of 300 mN at loading and unloading rates 600 mN/mN. Berkovich tip calibrated on fused silica was used for the indentation, and 10 indents were conducted on each sample.
ISO 695, “Glass Resistance to attack by a boiling aqueous solution of mixed alkali—method of test and classification” standard, was applied in order to determine and classify the alkali strength of the glass samples. This method involves determining and classifying the resistance of the glass samples interacting with the sodium carbonate and sodium hydroxide aqueous solution boiling at 102.5 ± 0.5 °C for 3 h according to the mass loss on the unit surface.

2.3. High Temperature Melting Observation

Melting and fining properties of glass composition (2% Ag2O) were also investigated using High Temperature Melting Observation System (HTMOS). As seen in Figure 2, the prepared batch was melted in a silica tube and video was recorded by the camera in the system from the beginning to the end of the melting process. Besides these transactions; aid of quantities of CO2 and SO2 gases, which are important for melting and fining, were measured using FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared).

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Antibacterial and Ion Release Tests of the Obtained Glass Samples

CuO- and SrO-doped glasses did not show any antibacterial activity according to the antibacterial test results. However, an antibacterial effect was observed for the Ag2O-doped glasses. Therefore, the studies continued with the Ag2O-doped glasses. When the antibacterial test results of Ag2O-doped glasses, given in Figure 3, were examined, it was found that the glass sample doped with 2.5% Ag2O has the best antibacterial effect.
No bacterial colony was observed in the test of 2.5% Ag2O against Escherichia coli in all replicates. According to the results, inactivation rate for E. coli of 2% and 2.5% Ag2O-containing glasses was higher than 99.99% (>5 log). Esteban-Tejeda et al. [32,33] reported that a logarithm reduction higher than 3 means safe disinfection and high antimicrobial activity. Moreover, International Microbiological Criteria for Dairy Products suggested that inactivation rate for E. coli must be 99.9% in order to be account as antibacterial glassware [34]. As seen in Figure 3, inactivation rate for E. coli of 2% and 2.5% Ag2O-containing glasses is 99.99%, which is the limit criteria for E. coli according to International Microbiological Criteria for Dairy Products [34].
Guldiren and Aydin provided antibacterial properties to their soda lime glass by adding silver and copper separately and together. Unlike the conventional melting method, the ion exchange method was used in their study. It means that the conventional soda lime glass production needs extra process. According the antimicrobial test results, E. coli bacteria decreased to 99.882% as the maximum. It can be seen that antibacterial soda lime glass obtained in our study by conventional melting method has better antibacterial activity against to E. coli than antibacterial soda lime glass obtained by ion exchange. It is also important to note that soda lime antibacterial glass obtained by conventional melting method has more advantageous in terms of time and cost compared with those obtained by ion exchange method because it does not need an extra process [31,35].
Esteban-Tejeda et al. used silver and copper nanoparticles in antibacterial soda lime glass studies. In their study, they mixed the soda lime glass with silver and copper nanoparticles and then sintered the obtained powders. In the results obtained in these studies, the reduction rate of bacteria is lower than this study [32,33].
Apart from these studies, sol–gel technique was used to give antibacterial feature to the soda lime glasses. Lee et al. showed that E. coli bacteria decreased to 99.99995% in the soda lime glass coated with silver-doped antibacterial film [36]. Since sol–gel method has disadvantages like long processing time, high cost of the process, and stripping of coating from the glass surface, producing antibacterial soda lime glass using melting method is much more advantageous.
After the results of the antibacterial test, toxic results of glass samples doped with 2.0% Ag2O and 2.5% Ag2O were evaluated using the values obtained from the ICP-OES test results. The test was performed in two replicates. One of the samples was kept in 4% (v/v) acetic acid for 1 day and the other sample was kept in 4% (v/v) acetic acid for a week at 22 °C (±2). As can be seen from Table 3, the released amounts of the metal ions from the obtained glasses were below toxic values for both acute toxicity and chronic effects of silver exposure. [37,38] The amount of released silver ions is so high with respect to the release in a week because mass transfer at the first moment occurs rapidly due to the concentration difference with the dissolution in the glass [39]. According to the antibacterial and ion release test results, glass sample doped with 2% Ag2O was selected for further studies in order to reduce the cost of the raw materials for the glass production.

3.2. Material Characterization

First of all, XRD analysis was performed on the obtained glass sample to detect the phase structure. It was seen from Figure 4 that the glass doped with 2% silver oxide was fully amorphous.
In addition to XRD analysis, XPS analysis was performed to find the energy levels of silver oxide. As seen from Figure 5a, the most prominent peaks belong to oxygen and silica. The peaks in the range of 360–380 eV belong to the silver (I) oxide, and the expanded graph of this region can be seen from Figure 5b. XPS analysis results indicated that silver (I) oxide was successfully incorporated into the glass doped with 2% Ag2O. This result also confirms the antibacterial property of the glass sample since silver oxide was detected on the surface of the glass sample.
Alkali strength test results showed that the weight loss of the glass sample containing 2% silver oxide was 68.37 mg/dm2. It was detected that alkali resistance class of glass is A1 according to Alkali Resistance Test Limits, which showed that alkali resistance characteristic is in low level degradation.
Furthermore, some tests were performed on the antibacterial glass sample to see physical and optical properties of the reference (nonantibacterial typical container glass) and antibacterial (2% Ag2O) glasses. As can be seen from Table 4, the physical properties of antibacterial glass and reference glass (nonantibacterial typical container glass) are close to each other, but optical properties of two glasses are different from each other. The color of the silver-doped glass is amber, which is totally different from the soda lime glass.
Viscosity measurements of the glasses were performed to see preliminary melting behavior. According to the results given in Table 5, viscosity values of the reference (nonantibacterial typical container glass) and the antibacterial glasses are slightly different, but when the softening temperature is reached, this difference is seen to decrease.
Lastly, hardness and elastic modulus of the glasses were measured to see mechanical behavior. The results showed that the hardness of antibacterial glass was 5.5 ± 0.1 GPa and that this value was the same as hardness of reference (nonantibacterial typical container glass) glass. Elastic modulus of antibacterial glass was measured as 73.2 ± 0.9 GPa, while the elastic modulus of reference glass was 73.3 GPa. It means that elastic modulus of two glasses is nearly same. Overall results indicated that the glass sample doped with 2% Ag2O has viscosity and optical and mechanical properties similar to those of commercial soda lime glass, which are glass types consisting of silicon dioxide, sodium oxide, calcium oxide, and magnesium oxide (MgO), and is generally used for the production of flat glass, container glass, and glassware [40,41].

3.3. High Temperature Melting Observation System

One of the originalities of this study is performing the High Temperature Melting Observation System (HTMOS) on the Ag2O-doped antibacterial soda lime glass obtained by conventional melting method for the first time. Figure 6a shows CO2 release during HTMOS measurements. As can be seen from Figure 6b that the melting reactions of antibacterial composition doped with 2% Ag2O started later than that of reference composition. In addition, according to Video 1 and Video 2 (See Supplementary Materials), the fining of the antibacterial composition doped with 2% Ag2O began slower than that of the reference glass (nonantibacterial typical container glass but also appeared to be better than the reference glass’s fining (nonantibacterial typical container glass), which can be seen from the surface of both glasses at the end of the experiment. The reason of that is the gases can reach the glass surface more easily and can be thrown out of the glass when viscosity of the glass is low.
Arslan et al. and Gulin et al. made detailed melting behavior experiments of different soda lime glass compositions using High Temperature Melting Observation System. According to the results, it can be seen that antibacterial soda lime glass obtained by conventional melting method shows a similar melting behavior to these compositions [42,43]. This result indicated that the antibacterial glass composition can be produced in soda lime glass furnaces without changing any furnace design and production parameters.

4. Conclusions

In this study, soda lime glass with antibacterial properties was produced with the addition of silver oxide to the batch. According to ICP-OES results, migration values were below toxic values. The antibacterial property of the glass produced with 2% silver oxide was found to be quite good, even with spores on glass with 2.5% silver oxide added glass. In addition, the degradation rate of antibacterial glass (2% Ag2O) was at a low rate against the alkali solution and identified as class A1. The physical properties of antibacterial glass and reference glass (nonantibacterial typical container glass) were almost the same, but their optical properties were different. Viscosity measurements indicated that the antibacterial glass was more viscous than that of the reference glass (nonantibacterial typical container glass). Overall results showed that the antibacterial composition can be adapted to glass industry without any need of change in the terms of furnace design and production parameters.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/21/4827/s1. Video 1: Melting behavior of nonantibacterial glass composition; Video 2: Meting behavior of antibacterial glass composition.

Author Contributions

B.D. and M.E.T. conceived and planned the experiments. B.D. carried out the experiments. B.D. and M.E.T. contributed to the interpretation of the results. B.D. took the lead in writing the manuscript. B.D. and M.E.T. discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Türkiye Şişe ve Cam Fabrikaları A.Ş.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mauro, J.C.; Zanotto, E.D. Two Centuries of Glass Research: Historical Trends, Current Status, and Grand Challenges for the Future. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 2014, 5, 313–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lindahl, J.F.; Grace, D. The consequences of human actions on risks for infectious diseases: A review. Infect. Ecol. Epidemiol. 2015, 5, 30048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Hammond, B.; Ali, Y.; Fendler, E.; Dolan, M.; Donovan, S. Effect of hand sanitizer use on elementary school absenteeism. Am. J. Infect. Control 2000, 28, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pal, S.; Tak, Y.K.; Song, J.M. Does the Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Depend on the Shape of the Nanoparticle? A Study of the Gram-Negative Bacterium Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 1712–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Xiu, Z.-M.; Zhang, Q.-B.; Puppala, H.L.; Colvin, V.L.; Alvarez, P.J.J. Negligible Particle-Specific Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 4271–4275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jones, N.; Ray, B.; Ranjit, K.T.; Manna, A.C. Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticle suspensions on a broad spectrum of microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008, 279, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Xie, Y.; He, Y.; Irwin, P.L.; Jin, T.; Shi, X. Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Action of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles againstCampylobacter jejuni. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 2325–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Guida, A.; Towler, M.R.; Wall, G.J.; Hill, R.G.; Eramo, S. Preliminary work on the antibacterial effect of strontium in glass ionomer cements. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 2003, 22, 1401–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lucacel, R.C.; Radu, T.; Tătar, A.S.; Lupan, I.; Ponta, O.; Simon, V. The influence of local structure and surface morphology on the antibacterial activity of silver-containing calcium borosilicate glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2014, 404, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Catauro, M.; Bollino, F.; Papale, F.; Ciprioti, S.V. Investigation on bioactivity, biocompatibility, thermal behavior and antibacterial properties of calcium silicate glass coatings containing Ag. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2015, 422, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schierholz, J.M.; Lucas, L.J.; Rump, A.; Pulverer, G. Efficacy of silver-coated medical devices. J. Hosp. Infect. 1998, 40, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Clement, J.L.; Jarrett, P.S. Antibacterial Silver. Met. Based Drugs 1994, 1, 467–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chopra, I. The increasing use of silver-based products as antimicrobial agents: A useful development or a cause for concern? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007, 59, 587–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Atkinson, I.; Anghel, E.M.; Predoana, L.; Mocioiu, O.C.; Jecu, L.; Raut, I.; Munteanu, C.; Culita, D.; Zaharescu, M. Influence of ZnO addition on the structural, in vitro behavior and antimicrobial activity of sol–gel derived CaO–P2O5–SiO2 bioactive glasses. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 3033–3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fernandes, J.S.; Gentile, P.; Pires, R.A.; Reis, R.L.; Hatton, P.V. Multifunctional bioactive glass and glass-ceramic biomaterials with antibacterial properties for repair and regeneration of bone tissue. Acta Biomater. 2017, 59, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Sergi, R.; Bellucci, D.; Salvatori, R.; Maisetta, G.; Batoni, G.; Cannillo, V. Zinc containing bioactive glasses with ultra-high crystallization temperature, good biological performance and antibacterial effects. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 104, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shahrbabak, M.S.N.; Sharifianjazi, F.; Rahban, D.; Salimi, A. A Comparative Investigation on Bioactivity and Antibacterial Properties of Sol-Gel Derived 58S Bioactive Glass Substituted by Ag and Zn. Silicon 2019, 11, 2741–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ranga, N.; Gahlyan, S.; Duhan, S. Antibacterial Efficiency of Zn, Mg and Sr Doped Bioactive Glass for Bone Tissue Engineering. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2020, 20, 2465–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vallet-Regi, M.; Romero, A.M.; Ragel, C.V.; LeGeros, R.Z. XRD, SEM-EDS, and FTIR studies of in vitro growth of an apatite-like layer on sol-gel glasses. J. Biomed. Mater. 1999, 44, 416–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vallet-Regí, M.; Salinas, A.J.; Román, J.; Gil, M. Effect of magnesium content on the in vitro bioactivity of CaO-MgO-SiO2-P2O5 sol-gel glasses. J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 515–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jie, Q.; Lin, K.; Zhong, J.; Shi, Y.; Li, Q.; Chang, J.; Wang, R. Preparation of Macroporous Sol-Gel Bioglass Using PVA Particles as Pore Former. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2004, 30, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gil-Albarova, J.; Garrido-Lahiguera, R.; Salinas, A.J.; Román, J.; Bueno-Lozano, A.L.; Gil-Albarova, R.; Vallet-Regi, M. The in vivo performance of a sol–gel glass and a glass-ceramic in the treatment of limited bone defects. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 4639–4645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Oki, A.; Parveen, B.; Hossain, S.; Adeniji, S.; Donahue, H. Preparation andin vitro bioactivity of zinc containing sol-gel-derived bioglass materials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2004, 69, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lao, J.; Nedelec, J.-M.; Moretto, P.; Jallot, E. Micro-PIXE characterization of interactions between a sol–gel derived bioactive glass and biological fluids. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 2006, 245, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Zhang, K.; Washburn, N.R.; Simon, C.G., Jr. Cytotoxicity of three-dimensionally ordered macroporous sol–gel bioactive glass (3DOM-BG). Biomaterials 2005, 26, 4532–4539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Meseguer-Olmo, L.; Ros-Nicolás, M.J.; Vicente-Ortega, V.; Alcaraz-Baños, M.; Clavel-Sainz, M.; Arcos, D.; Ragel, C.V.; Vallet-Regí, M.; Meseguer-Ortiz, C. A bioactive sol-gel glass implant for in vivo gentamicin release. Experimental model in Rabbit. J. Orthop. Res. 2006, 24, 454–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jaroch, D.B.; Clupper, D.C. Modulation of zinc release from bioactive sol–gel derived SiO2-CaO-ZnO glasses and ceramics. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2007, 82, 575–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Balamurugan, A.; Balossier, G.; Michel, J.; Kannan, S.; Benhayoune, H.; Rebelo, A.H.S.; Ferreira, J.M.F. Sol gel derived SiO2-CaO-MgO-P2O5 bioglass system—Preparation andin vitro characterization. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2007, 83, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Balamurugan, A.; Balossier, G.; Kannan, S.; Michel, J.; Rebelo, A.H.; Ferreira, J.M. Development and in vitro characterization of sol–gel derived CaO–P2O5–SiO2–ZnO bioglass. Acta Biomater. 2007, 3, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Barton, S.D.; Click, C.A.; Howse, T.K.G. Glass Container Composition. U.S. Patent 8,785,337 B2, 22 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  31. Guldiren, D.; Aydin, S. Characterization and antimicrobial properties of soda lime glass prepared by silver/sodium ion exchange. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 67, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Esteban-Tejeda, L.; Malpartida, F.; Esteban-Cubillo, A.; Pecharromán, C.; Moya, J.S. The antibacterial and antifungal activity of a soda-lime glass containing silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 085103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Esteban-Tejeda, L.; Malpartida, F.; Esteban-Cubillo, A.; Pecharroman, C.; Moya, J.S. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of a soda-lime glass containing copper nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 505701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Institute of Medicine (US); National Research Council (US); Committee on the Review of the Use of Scientific Criteria and Performance Standards for Safe Food. International Microbiological Criteria for Dairy Products; National Academies Press (US): Washington, DC, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  35. Guldiren, D.; Aydın, S. Antimicrobial property of silver, silver-zinc and silver-copper incorporated soda lime glass prepared by ion exchange. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 78, 826–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lee, S.M.; Lee, B.S.; Byun, T.G.; Song, K.C. Preparation and antibacterial activity of silver-doped organic–inorganic hybrid coatings on glass substrates. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2010, 355, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. 37. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry U.S. Public Health Service. Toxicological Profile for Silver. 1990. Available online: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp146.pdf (accessed on 10 April 2020).
  38. Hadrup, N.; Lam, H.R. Oral toxicity of silver ions, silver nanoparticles and colloidal silver—A review. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2014, 68, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Reiter, T.; Panick, T.; Schuhladen, K.; Roether, J.A.; Hum, J.; Boccaccini, A.R. Bioactive glass based scaffolds coated with gelatin for the sustained release of icariin. Bioact. Mater. 2019, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. NSG, Group. Properties of Soda-Lime Silica Float Glass. Tech. Bull. 2013, ATS-129, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  41. Buckett, J.; Marsh, J.S.; Torr, A.C. Soda-Lime-Silica Glass Composition. World Intellectual Property. Organization Patent WO/02/16277 A1, 28 February 2002. [Google Scholar]
  42. Arslan, B.; Akdemir, M.; Sesigür, H.; Oran, M. An Experimental Study on the Batch Optimization of Tableware Glasses. In Proceedings of the XI ESG Conference, Parma, Italy, 21–24 September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  43. Demirok, G.; Oran, M.; Sesigür, H.; Arslan, B. Fining: Impact of sodium sulphate and anthracite in soda-lime silicate glass. In Proceedings of the 2017 ICG Annual Meeting & 32nd Şişecam Glass Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, 22–25 October 2017. [Google Scholar]
Materials 13 04827 g001 550
Figure 1. Glass samples containing (a) silver (I) oxide, (b) copper (II) oxide, and (c) strontium oxide.
Figure 1. Glass samples containing (a) silver (I) oxide, (b) copper (II) oxide, and (c) strontium oxide.
Materials 13 04827 g001
Materials 13 04827 g002 550
Figure 2. High Temperature Melting Observation System.
Figure 2. High Temperature Melting Observation System.
Materials 13 04827 g002
Materials 13 04827 g003 550
Figure 3. Inactivation rate of Escherichia coli.
Figure 3. Inactivation rate of Escherichia coli.
Materials 13 04827 g003
Materials 13 04827 g004 550
Figure 4. XRD results.
Figure 4. XRD results.
Materials 13 04827 g004
Materials 13 04827 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) XPS analysis and (b) silver energy range graph of glass sample doped with 2% Ag2O.
Figure 5. (a) XPS analysis and (b) silver energy range graph of glass sample doped with 2% Ag2O.
Materials 13 04827 g005
Materials 13 04827 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) CO2 release during HTMOS measurements and (b) CO2 release at the start of melting reaction.
Figure 6. (a) CO2 release during HTMOS measurements and (b) CO2 release at the start of melting reaction.
Materials 13 04827 g006
Table
Table 1. Composition of typical glass container (nonantibacterial) glass composition.
Table 1. Composition of typical glass container (nonantibacterial) glass composition.
SiO2 (%)Al2O3 (%)Fe2O3 (%)TiO2 (%)CaO (%)MgO (%)Na2O (%)K2O (%)SO3 (%)
71.401.710.060.069.793.2813.170.310.24
Table
Table 2. Compositions of antibacterial glasses.
Table 2. Compositions of antibacterial glasses.
SiO2 (wt.%)Al2O3 (wt.%)Fe2O3 (wt.%)TiO2 (wt.%)CaO (wt.%)MgO (wt.%)Na2O (wt.%)K2O (wt.%)SO3 (wt.%)Ion (wt.%)
71.401.710.060.069.293.2813.170.310.240.50
70.901.710.060.069.293.2813.170.310.241.00
70.401.710.060.069.293.2813.170.310.241.50
69.401.710.060.069.293.2813.170.310.242.50
Table
Table 3. Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-OES) test results.
Table 3. Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-OES) test results.
The Released Amount of Silver Ion (Glass Doped with 2% Ag2O)The Released Amount of Silver Ion (Glass Doped with 2.5% Ag2O)
A day in acetic acid0.280.59
A day in water0.160.22
A week in acetic acid0.720.89
A week in water0.330.43
Table
Table 4. Physical and optical test results.
Table 4. Physical and optical test results.
ReferenceAntibacterial
Thermal expansion coefficient (10−7/°C)86.585.5
Density (g/cm3)2.4932.512
Refractive index1.52001.5205
Color parameters (standard 3 mm)
Brightness (%)72.019.7
Dominant wavelength (nm)556.5588.7
Table
Table 5. Viscosity measurement results.
Table 5. Viscosity measurement results.
ViscosityTemperature (°C)
ReferenceAntibacterial (First Measurement)Antibacterial (Second Measurement)
log η = 2.25 (±0.018) (melting temperature)137213881388
log η = 2.50 (±0.014)130913231323
log η = 2.75 (±0.009)125212651264
log η = 3.00 (±0.011) (Gob temperature)120012121211
log η = 3.25 (±0.012)115411621162
log η = 3.50 (±0.015)111111191118
log η = 4.00 (±0.016)103610421041
log η = 7.65 (softening temperature)734 (±2.3)739 (±2.3)–
Working range (WR) Tlogη=3 − Tlogη=7.65466473–
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Demirel, B.; Erol Taygun, M. Production of Soda Lime Glass Having Antibacterial Property for Industrial Applications. Materials 2020, 13, 4827. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214827

AMA Style

Demirel B, Erol Taygun M. Production of Soda Lime Glass Having Antibacterial Property for Industrial Applications. Materials. 2020; 13(21):4827. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214827

Chicago/Turabian Style

Demirel, Barış, and Melek Erol Taygun. 2020. "Production of Soda Lime Glass Having Antibacterial Property for Industrial Applications" Materials 13, no. 21: 4827. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214827

APA Style

Demirel, B., & Erol Taygun, M. (2020). Production of Soda Lime Glass Having Antibacterial Property for Industrial Applications. Materials, 13(21), 4827. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214827

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop