Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of Hydrogenated Diamond-Like Carbon (HDLC) Nanocomposite Films with Metal (Ag, Cu) Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Reduced Graphene Oxide-Based Impedimetric Immunosensor for Detection of Enterotoxin A in Milk Samples
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Different Effects of Organic Amines on Synthetic Metal Phosphites/Phosphates

1
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China
2
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
3
College of Mining, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(7), 1752; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13071752
Submission received: 18 March 2020 / Revised: 6 April 2020 / Accepted: 7 April 2020 / Published: 9 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Porous Materials)

Abstract

:
Four metal phosphites/phosphates crystal materials C8N4H34Al2P4O18 (1), C3N2H17GaP2O8 (2), H5In2P3O10 (3), and H9In2P3O13 (4) have been solvothermally synthesized by organic amines in the presence of mixed solvents. Structural analyses indicate that compound 1 and 2 show one-dimensional (1D) chain structures; compound 3 and 4 are three-dimensional (3D) inorganic open-framework indium phosphites. Organic amines show different mechanisms in the four compounds. The 2,2′-bipyridine organic amine acts as a template source and it breaks down small molecules, which enter into the structure of compound 1. For compound 2, 1,2-propanediamine has a role as protonated template and it forms a hydrogen bond with the inorganic skeleton structure. As for compound 3 and 4 without the organic template, the benzylamine and 2,2′-bipyridine mainly serve as structure-directing agent. Especially, compound 3 has an odd seven-ring channel, and compound 4 contains 3D intersecting six-ring, eight-ring, and 10-ring channels. X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), CHN, inductive coupled plasma (ICP), Infrared (IR), and thermal gravimetric (TG) analyze the four compounds.

1. Introduction

Inorganic open-framework metal phosphates have been widely studied due to their channel structure and potential applications in industrial catalysis, gas separations, and so forth [1,2,3,4]. For example, SAPO-34 catalysts provide an alternative platform for methanol conversion to olefins (MTO), which produces basic chemicals from nonparallel resources, such as natural gas and coal [5]. Since the aluminophosphate zeolite was first reported in 1982 [6], various metal phosphate materials have been found in related literature [7,8,9]. Presently, a lot of researches on pyramidal phosphite have been made for replacing traditional phosphate tetrahedron [10,11,12]. Novel structures with an interrupted framework can be easily formed due to the P-H bond of phosphite [13]. Particularly, some novel structures and performances of metal phosphites can be easily generated, such as ZnHPO-CJ1 with extra-large 24-ring channels [14], JIS-3 containing magnetic anisotropy of the antiferromagnetism [15], NTHU-13 with tunable channel sizes that range from 24-ring to 72-ring channels [16] and QDU-5 involving room temperature phosphorescence [17]. The results show that the account of transition metal phosphites is major in the reported literature on phosphites. However, the main group metal phosphite has been less reported [18], exploring an effective route to prepare main group metal phosphite materials is of particular importance.
Generally, organic amines are required to synthesize open framework metal phosphites/phosphates materials [19]. Various amines play different functions in the preparation process of abundant open framework structures. For instance, the methylviologen played as protonated templates in JU98 and JU104 [20,21], the 1,3,5-tri (1-imidazolyl) phenyl organic amine acted as ligands in NCU-2 [22], and the 4-dimethylaminopyridine personated as structure-directing agent in PKU-25Al [23]. Organic amines can play multiple roles in the formation of crystal materials [24,25]. In addition, some organic amines have not been integrated into the structure, but the target product cannot be synthesized without the addition of organic amines, such as the structure of InHPO-CJ13 [26]. Special porous channels and chemical properties are constituted by the presence of organic amines [27]. Exploring the role of organic amines is meaningful in the synthetic field of open-framework metal phosphites/phosphates.
We systematically designed a series of experimental ratios to explore the synthesis of Al, Ga, and In open-framework phosphites/phosphates materials in order to study the main group of metal phosphite materials. Herein, Four main group metal phosphites/phosphates crystal materials C8N4H34Al2P4O18 (1), C3N2H17GaP2O8 (2), H5In2P3O10 (3), and H11In2P3O13 (4) with different dimensional features were solvothermally synthesized by organic amines. In addition to the synthesis of four new materials, different from the previous synthesis of main group metal phosphite materials [28], we also analyzed the mechanism of organic amine in the four materials. Interestingly, these organic amines show diverse manifestations in the synthetic process.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Instruments

The reagents were purchased and not further purified. These mainly contained phosphorous acid (H3PO3, 99%, Aladdin Chemistry Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), aluminium isopropoxide (C9H21AlO3, 98%, Aladdin Chemistry Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), gallium nitrate (Ga(NO3)3·6H2O, 98%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), indium chloride (InCl3·4H2O, 98%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), 2,2′-bipyridine (C10H8N2, 99%, 1.1668 g/ml, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), 1,2-propanediamine (C3H10N2, 99%, 0.86 g/ml, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), benzylamine (C7H9N, 99%, 0.98 g/ml, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), ethanol (C2H6O, 99.5%, 0.79 g/ml, Liaoning Quan Rui Reagent Co., Ltd., Shenyang, China), 1,2-propanediol (C3H8O2, 99%, 1.04 g/ml, Liaoning Quan Rui Reagent Co., Ltd., Shenyang, China), isobutanol (C4H10O, 99%, 0.81 g/ml, Liaoning Quan Rui Reagent Co., Ltd., Shenyang, China), 1-pentanol (C5H12O, 99%, 0.82 g/ml, Liaoning Quan Rui Reagent Co., Ltd., Shenyang, China), and demonized water (18.2 MΩ·cm, N50-DI Deionizer, Dongguanshi Naibaichuan Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd., Dongguan, China).
The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were measured by using Rigaku 2500 X-ray diffractometer (λ = 1.5418 Å) device (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). Thermal gravimetric (TG) analyses of samples were performed on a device of Perkin-Elmer TGA7 with a heating rate of 10 °C/min. (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, USA). Infrared spectrum (IR) data were detected on Nicolet Impact 410 FTIR spectrometer in a wavenumber range of 4000–400 cm−1 (Nicolet, New York, USA). Al, Ga, In and P elements were analyzed using the Perkin-Elmer Optima 3300 DV inductive coupled plasma (ICP) spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, USA). C, N, and H elements were conducted on a Perkin-Elmer 2400 elemental (CHN) analyzer (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, USA). The surface morphology of samples was characterized by using JEOL JSM-7500F Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) device (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The single-crystal XRD data were tested by using Bruker ApexII CCD diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany).

2.2. Synthesis and Initial Characterization

In a typical reaction to synthesize 1, a mixture of aluminium isopropoxide (0.10 g, 0.5 mmol), 2,2′-bipyridine (0.16 g, 1.0 mmol), phosphite (0.328 g, 4.0 mmol), ethanol (1 mL), and demonized water (8 mL) was put into a reaction kettle at 160 °C for 7 d. The colorless cube like products were solvothermally synthesized, being rinsed twice with demonized water and then dried in the air (Figure 1a). The results of simulation and experimental XRD show that the product has a pure phase (Figure 2a). The ICP and CHN analyses of C8N4H34Al2P4O18 (1) (651.96) gave P: 19.05%, Al: 8.22%, C: 14.67%, H: 5.16%, and N: 8.64%. (Calc. P: 19.00%, Al: 8.31%, C: 14.74%, H: 5.22% and N: 8.60%). The IR spectrum of 1 exhibited typical curve (Figure 3a). The spectrum range of 2860–3230 cm−1 was owing to stretching vibrations of N-H bonds and C-H bonds, while the peaks at 1205, 1006, 576, and 545 cm−1 were related to the vibration of the P-O bonds [29]. The absorption peaks at 1630, 3399, and 3548 cm−1 were due to the bending and stretching vibrations of O–H bonds.
To synthesize 2, a typical synthetic process of Ga(NO3)3·6H2O (0.12 g), H3PO3 (0.25 g), 1,2-propanediamine (0.25 mL), 1,2-propanediol (6 mL), and demonized water (3 mL) under stirring to form a mixed solution. The final mixture was put into the stainless steel reactor and kept at 160 °C for 5 d. The colorless parallelepiped block products were rinsed and collected (Figure 1b). The characteristic peaks of simulated and experimental XRD analysis were corresponding (Figure 2b). Experimental test analysis found (%) C3N2H17GaP2O8 (2) (340.83): P, 14.35; Ga, 29.78; C, 10.62; H, 4.87; N, 8.15. Calc. (%): P, 14.24; Ga, 30.08; C, 10.56; H, 4.99; N, 8.22. The IR spectrum of 2 (Figure 3b) gave the absorption peaks at 3220 cm−1 and 3130 cm−1, which could be classified as a stretching vibration of O-H and N-H bonds. The absorption peak at 2960 cm−1 was attributed to the stretching vibration of C-H bonds, while a sharp absorption peak at 2370 cm−1 proved the presence of the P–H group [30]. The sharp absorption peaks at 1620 cm−1 and 1560 cm−1 could be resulted from the bending vibration of C-H and N-H bonds. The peaks at 1120 cm−1 and 540 cm−1 were brought about the stretching and bending vibration of the P-O bonds.
Compound 3 was solvothermally prepared from mixture of InCl3·4H2O, H3PO3, benzylamine, isobutanol, and demonized water with the mole ratio of 1.0 : 16.0 : 4.0 : 200 : 1000. The reaction mixture was enclosed into the autoclave and heated at 160 °C for 7 d. Subsequently, the hexahedral block products were rinsed and collected (Figure 1c). The positions of characteristic peak for simulated and experimental XRD are consistent (Figure 2c). Elemental analysis found (%) H5In2P3O10 (3) (487.59): P, 19.05; In, 47.10; H, 1.03. Calc. (%): P, 19.13; In, 47.12; H, 1.01. The IR spectrum (Figure 3c) exhibited typical changes for 3. The interrupted bands at 1080, 590, and 495 cm−1 were owing to the vibration of P-O bonds. The sharp band of 2370 cm−1 confirmed the existence of P–H groups. The absorption peaks at 3330 cm−1, 3250 cm−1, and 3160 cm−1 were related to the stretching vibration of O-H bonds.
Compound 4 was prepared in the system of InCl3·4H2O-2,2′-bipyridine-H3PO3-1-pentanol-H2O. Typically, InCl3·4H2O (0.11 g), 2,2′-bipyridine (0.16 g), H3PO3 (0.33 g), and 1-pentanol (3.0 mL) were dissolved into demonized water (5.0 mL). The mixtures were put into the reactor at 150 °C for 5 d. The hexahedral block products were rinsed and collected to analyze data after drying in air (Figure 1d). The positions of characteristic peak for the simulated and experimental XRD are consistent (Figure 2d). Elemental analysis found (%) H11In2P3O13 (4) (541.62): P, 17.25; In, 42.46; H, 1.76. Calc. (%): P, 17.16; In, 42.39; H, 1.67. The IR spectrum of compound 4 (Figure 3d) exhibited a typical structural functional group changes. The discontinuous bands at 1110, 570, and 510 cm−1 were owing to the vibration of P-O bonds. The presence of P–H groups with stretching vibration was proven by the peak at 2420 cm−1. The absorption bands at 3245 cm−1, 3150 cm−1, and 2980 cm−1 were classified as the stretching vibration of O-H bond.

2.3. Determination of Crystal Structure

Four massive single crystals were used to test single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. The SAINT program treated data processing [31]. Their crystal structures were repaired by using refined via full matrix least squares of SHELXTL-97 and direct methods [32]. For compound 1 and 2, the atoms of inorganic skeleton and organic matter were easily located. However, organic amine of compound 1 was decomposed, and confirmed by analyses of CHN, IR, and TG. While for compound 3 and 4, the structure contained no organic template. The locations of inorganic skeleton atoms could be easily determined, and other homologous atoms were decided by the Fourier maps. Table 1 shows the experimental data of four compounds for the structural decision. Table S1 provides the data of bond distances and bond angles data. The CCDC numbers (1985961–1985964) can be obtained from www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structure and Characterization

C8N4H34Al2P4O18, 1. The asymmetric unit includes one phosphorus atom, one aluminum atom, two nitrogen atoms, four carbon atoms, seven oxygen atoms, and one free water molecule (Figure 4a). The space between the P atom and O atom is in the region 1.504(3)–1.540(3) Å, while the bond angles of O-P-O vary in the region of 106.89(17)–113.16(18)°. The Al-O bonds are located in the range from 1.717(3) Å to 1.722(3) Å. The O-Al-O bond angle varies in the region of 106.07(16)–113.5(2)° (Table S1), which is related to the four coordinated Al atom. These structural data are compatible with publicly reported in other aluminum phosphates [33]. P atom and Al atom are both paired by four oxygen atoms. The alternating connection of the PO4 tetrahedras and AlO4 tetrahedras leads to generate a one-dimensional (1D) chain with vertex-sharing connected four-ring along z axis (Figure 5a). Protonized organic amines and lattice water molecules balance the charges of anion skeleton. We can note that the organic amines and 1D chains are arranged in the ABAB alternate dislocation form along [010] direction (Figure 5b). A similar 1D chain has been recorded in the phosphate literature [34]. It is worth noting that the original organic template was broken down and it entered the structure in the form of another new type, which is a relatively rare phenomenon. This phenomenon has not been reported in the synthesis of one-dimensional aluminum phosphate.
C3N2H17GaP2O8, 2. The asymmetric unit contains one GaO6 octahedron, two HPO3 pseudo pyramids, one diprotonized 1,2-propanediamine molecule, and one free water molecule (Figure 4b). What is interesting is that there is a hydroxyl group to coordinate the Ga of octahedron. The Ga–O bond distance is located in the region 1.941(4)–1.998(4) Å and O-Ga-O bond angle varies from 86.92(19)° to 179.62(19)°. For the HPO3 pseudo pyramids, the P-H bond lengths are 1.3333 Å and 1.3721 Å, and the P-O bond distance is situated in the ranges from 1.497(5)–1.524(5) Å. The O-H bond length is 0.9863 Å, while other structural data were provided by supporting information (Table S1b). In terms of dimension, 2 has a particular 1D chain structure, which contains Ga-O-Ga chain (Figure 6a). The hydroxyl group is directly linked between the GaO6 octahedron. The hydrogen bonds are formed between diprotonized n-heptylamine and framework chain (Figure 6b), a pseudo-2D layer structure is constructed from hydrogen bond connections. A similar 1D chain aluminum phosphite has been reported in known literature [35]. However, no similar structure has been reported in gallium phosphite compounds. There is no correlative literature on the synthesis of one-dimensional chain gallium phosphite using 1,2-propanediamine molecule.
H5In2P3O10, 3. It contains three crystallographically distinct P atoms, two crystallographically unique In atoms, nine oxygen atoms, and one coordinate water molecule (Figure 4c). All of the P atoms are coordinated to three O atoms and a terminal H atom. The P-O bond varies from 1.505(3) Å to 1.558(3) Å and O-P-O bond angles are in the range of 103.7–114.90(18)°. The P-H bond lengths are 1.3205 Å, 1.2239 Å, and 1.3038 Å. Each of the In atoms is octahedrally coordinated to six oxygen atoms. The In-O distance varies from 2.072(3) Å to 2.237(3) Å, while the O-In-O bond angle changes from 84.64(11)° to 170.72(13)° (Table S1c). 3 is a 3D inorganic open-framework indium phosphite compound. It shows a pillared-layer structure along [001] direction (Figure 7a). The layers are connected to each other by bridging oxygen. The layer structure consists of dense four-ring in (101) plane, as indicated in Figure 7b. It can also be viewed as a 1D chain ABAB stack, which contains a special binuclear In2O10 cluster (Figure 7c). We can find that In2O10 cluster is joined by edge-sharing, and it forms a four-ring chain structure by dislocation connection with HPO3 pseudo pyramids. Rarely, compound 3 has an odd seven-ring channel in the (100) direction and it contains two kinds of channels with different positions (Figure 8). A similar three-dimensional (3D) open-framework compound has been reported in indium phosphite literature [36]. The difference is that the used organic templating agent is different, and the structural analysis method is different, especially the seven-ring channel.
H9In2P3O13, 4. As indicated in Figure 4d, it contains three crystallographically unique phosphorus atoms, two unique indium atoms, nine crystallographically unique oxygen atoms, one free water molecule, and two coordinate water molecules. All the phosphorus atoms exist in the form of HPO3 pseudo pyramids, while indium atoms exist in the form of InO6 octahedron. The distance of P-O bonds is in the range of 1.504(3)–1.532(4) Å, In-O bond distances vary from 2.084(3) Å to 2.203(3) Å, and the P-H bond lengths are 1.3711 Å, 1.3383 Å, and 1.3340 Å. Refer to Table S1d for the detailed structure information of 4. Compound 4 is 3D open-framework structure with 3D intersecting six-ring, eight-ring, and 10-ring channels along (001), (100), and (010) directions (Figure 9). When following the [001] direction, it can be considered as a densely packed ABAB layer structure (Figure 10a). The relationship between AB layers is shown in Figure 11. The layers have 12-ring windows, which are stacked by chains and HPO3 pillars (Figure 10b). It is noteworthy that the chain is a unique left-handed helical chain (Figure 10c). The isostructural inorganic structure has been appeared in related literature report [37]. The difference is the used organic amine and the analysis of the 12-ring window.

3.2. Thermogravimetric Analysis

Figure 12 presents the derivative of losses for compound 1–4. The TG curve of 1 exhibited a total weight loss of 30.63%, which was due to the miss of lattice water molecules (observed: 4.68%; calculated: 5.52%) and organic amine molecules (observed: 25.95%; calculated: 27.04%) (Figure 12a). The lower weight loss is due to the remaining carbon in the solid residue, which cannot burn out (black in color) [38]. TG for 2 showed three stages of weight loss with a total of 33.17% between 100 and 650 °C (Figure 12b), which was related to the lattice water molecules (observed: 5.26%; calculated: 5.29%), 1,2-propanediamine molecules (observed: 24.37%; calculated: 21.75%), and hydroxyl groups (observed: 3.53%; calculated: 4.99%). The hydroxyl groups were released as water molecules. In addition, sectional hydroxyl groups were released in the second weightlessness temperature region. For compound 3, the observed decrease of 3.64% between 100 and 400 °C corresponded well to the coordinated water (calculated: 3.69%) (Figure 12c). The TG curve of 4 showed a total weight decrease of 13.46%, which was related to the lattice water molecules (observed: 3.99%; calculated: 3.34%) and coordinated water molecules (observed: 9.35%; calculated: 10.02%) (Figure 12d). The XRD analysis indicates that the structure of 1–4 became amorphous after heat treatment at 400 °C for 2 h. IR analysis could indicate that the water and propanediamine of 1–4 had been removed after heat treatment at the corresponding temperature.

3.3. Roles of Organic Amines

These four different compounds were synthesized by three organic amines. These organic amines, as alkaline substances, will play a role in regulating the pH value. In addition, they have different functions in different forms. For compound 1, the 2,2′-bipyridine organic template breaks down 2,3-diaminobutane small molecule, which enters into the structure. It is part of the molecular 2, 2-bipyridine structure, as seen from the structure. Accordingly, 2,2′-bipyridine acts as a template source. As for compound 2, 1,2-propanediamine organic amine goes into the structure, and retained intact. It has a role as protonated template to balance the anion charge of the skeleton. On the other side, the N-H bonds of the 1,2-propanediamine form hydrogen bond with the inorganic skeleton structure, which effectively improves the stability of the compound 2. For compound 3 and 4 without the organic template, the benzylamine and 2,2′-bipyridine mainly serve as structure-directing agents. Although organic templates do not enter the structure, they are indispensable, because target product cannot be synthesized without organic templates. The two organic amines are selective to the synthesized structure.

4. Conclusions

Four different dimensional metal phosphites/phosphates have been synthesized by the mixed solvothermal method in the presence of organic amines. These amines show different mechanisms in the four compounds. The 2,2′-bipyridine organic template acts as a template source and breaks down small molecules in compound 1. For compound 2, 1,2-propanediamine has a role to play as a protonated template. The organic amines of compound 3 and 4 play as structure-directing agent. In terms of skeleton structure, compound 3 contains an odd 7-ring channel and In2O10 cluster, while compound 4 has 3D intersecting channels and left-handed helical chains. The successful synthesis of four compounds is helpful for studying the role of organic amines and exploring more microporous materials with novel structures.

Supplementary Materials

The following is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/7/1752/s1, Table S1: Bond lengths [Å] and bond angles (°) for compound 1–4.

Author Contributions

X.W. and Z.D. conceived and designed the paper; X.W. and C.M. performed the experiment; X.W. and H.Y. analyzed the data; X.Z. and W.W. helped shape the research; X.W. and S.Y. wrote the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51774175 and 51805235), Joint Research Fund Liaoning-Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science (2019JH3/30100025) and College Students’ innovation training program (201910147119).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, J.; Corma, A.; Yu, J. Synthesis of new zeolite structures. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 7112–7127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Cheetham, A.K.; Férey, G.; Loiseau, T. Open-framework inorganic materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3268–3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Davis, M.E. Ordered porous materials for emerging applications. Nature 2002, 417, 813–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dusselier, M.; Davis, M.E. Small-pore zeolites: Synthesis and catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 5265–5329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, M.; Fan, D.; Wei, Y.; Tian, P.; Liu, Z. Recent Progress in Methanol-to-Olefins (MTO) Catalysts. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1902181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wilson, S.T.; Lok, B.M.; Messina, C.A.; Cannan, T.R.; Flanigen, E.M. Aluminophosphate molecular sieves: A new class of microporous crystalline inorganic solids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 1146–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Murugavel, R.; Choudhury, A.; Walawalkar, M.G.; Pothiraja, R.; Rao, C.N.R. Metal complexes of organophosphate esters and open-framework metal phosphates: Synthesis, structure, transformations, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3549–3655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Y.; Yu, J.; Xu, R. Criteria for zeolite frameworks realizable for target synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1673–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ekambaram, S.; Sevov, S.C. Organically Templated Mixed-Valent TiIII/TiIV Phosphate with an Octahedral-Tetrahedral Open Framework. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 372–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, T.; Qi, X.; Li, J.; Zeng, H.; Zou, G.; Lin, Z. Using Multifunctional Ionic Liquids in the Synthesis of Crystalline Metal Phosphites and Hybrid Framework Solids. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 14031–14034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, F.; Huang, L.L.; Xiu, Z.J.; Yin, Y.Z.; Ma, Y.K.; Bi, Y.F.; Zheng, Z.P. Solvent-free synthesis and room temperature proton conductivity of new cobalt phosphite-oxalates. Crystengcomm 2018, 20, 5544–5550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, H.L.; Wang, S.L. An extraordinary boron-mediated 16R-channel-containing trivalent vanadium phosphite with unique solid state redox properties. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 6141–6143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rojo, T.; Mesa, J.L.; Lago, J.; Bazan, B.; Pizarro, J.L.; Arriortua, M.I. Organically templated open-framework phosphites. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 3793–3818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liang, J.; Li, J.Y.; Yu, J.H.; Chen, P.; Fang, Q.R.; Sun, F.X.; Xu, R.R. (C4H12N)2Zn3(HPO3)4: An open-framework zinc phosphite containing extra-large 24-ring channels. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2006, 45, 2546–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xing, H.Z.; Yang, W.T.; Su, T.; Li, Y.; Xu, J.; Nakano, T.; Yu, J.H.; Xu, R.R. Ionothermal Synthesis of Extra-Large-Pore Open-Framework Nickel Phosphite 5H3O center dot Ni8(HPO3)9Cl3 center dot 1.5H2O: Magnetic Anisotropy of the Antiferromagnetism. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2328–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lin, H.-Y.; Chin, C.-Y.; Huang, H.-L.; Huang, W.-Y.; Sie, M.-J.; Huang, L.-H.; Lee, Y.-H.; Lin, C.-H.; Lii, K.-H.; Bu, X. Crystalline inorganic frameworks with 56-ring, 64-ring, and 72-ring channels. Science 2013, 339, 811–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ni, A.-Y.; Mu, Y.; Pan, J.; Han, S.-D.; Shang, M.-M.; Wang, G.-M. An organic–inorganic hybrid zinc phosphite framework with room temperature phosphorescence. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 3712–3714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Luo, X.C.; Luo, D.B.; Zeng, H.M.; Gong, M.C.; Chen, Y.Q.; Lin, Z.E. A 3,4-Connected Beryllium Phosphite Framework Containing 24-Ring Channels with a Very Low Density. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 8697–8699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Luo, X.C.; Gong, M.C.; Chen, Y.Q.; Lin, Z.E. Flux synthesis of two new open-framework zinc phosphites with 16-ring channels. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2010, 131, 418–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tao, C.; Wu, J.; Yan, Y.; Shi, C.; Li, J. A new methylviologen-templated zinc gallophosphate zeolite with photo-/thermochromism, fluorescent and photoelectric properties. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 541–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, J.; Yan, Y.; Liu, B.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Yu, J. Multifunctional open-framework zinc phosphate| C12H14N2|[Zn6(PO4)4(HPO4)(H2O)2]: Photochromic, photoelectric and fluorescent properties. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 4995–4997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, C.-M.; Chang, T.-Y.; Lee, L.-W.; Lin, H.-M.; Lu, K.-L.; Lii, K.-H. The first zinc phosphite with remarkable structural and functional transformations. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 7824–7826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lin, C.; Pan, F.J.; Li, J.; Chen, Y.P.; Shi, D.E.; Ma, T.Q.; Yang, Y.Q.; Du, X.; Wang, W.; Liao, F.H.; et al. An Open-Framework Aluminophosphite with Face-Sharing AlO6 Octahedra Dimers and Extra-Large 14-Ring Channels. Cryst. Growth Des. 2018, 18, 1267–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, C.-M.; Chiu, C.-W.; Lin, H.-M.; Lii, K.-H. Synthesis and characterization of three-layered zinc phosphites containing tert-octylamine molecules with template and ligand roles. J. Solid State Chem. 2013, 204, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Dong, Z.; Meng, C.; Li, X.; Hong, X.; Yang, S. The effects of different dimensional organic amines on synthetic zinc phosphites/phosphates. J. Porous Mater. 2020, 27, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, X.; Yan, Y.; Wu, J.; Zhang, C.; Li, J. Solvothermal syntheses and structures of four indium-phosphite coordination polymers. Crystengcomm 2014, 16, 2266–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, G.M.; Li, J.H.; Wei, L.; Han, S.D.; Zhao, X.M.; Bao, Z.Z. An open-framework beryllium phosphite with extra-large 18-ring channels. Crystengcomm 2015, 17, 8414–8417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xue, Z.Z.; Pan, J.; Li, J.H.; Wang, Z.H.; Wang, G.M. Synthesis, structure and characterization of two new organic template-directed gallium phosphate/phosphite-oxalates. J. Mol. Struct. 2017, 1138, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, K.C.; Li, T.; Zeng, H.M.; Zou, G.H.; Zhang, Q.H.; Lin, Z.E. Ionothermal Synthesis of Open-Framework Metal Phosphates Using a Multifunctional Ionic Liquid. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 8726–8729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, J.; Lou, L.; Liu, H.; Su, T.; Wang, Z.; Li, J. Ionothermal synthesis of a photoelectroactive titanophosphite with a three-dimensional open-framework. Crystengcomm 2019, 21, 5867–5871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. SAINT, B. A. Inc. 5465 East Cheryl Parkway; SAINT, B. A. Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2000; p. 53711. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Song, X.; Li, Y.; Gan, L.; Wang, Z.; Yu, J.; Xu, R. Heteroatom-stabilized chiral framework of aluminophosphate molecular sieves. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 314–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chen, P.; Li, J.; Yu, J.; Wang, Y.; Pan, Q.; Xu, R. The synthesis and structure of a chiral 1D aluminophosphate chain compound: D-Co(en)3[AlP2O8]·6.5H2O. J. Solid State Chem. 2005, 178, 1929–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xiang, Y.; Zhang, L.W.; Chen, W.H.; Chen, J.Z.; Zeng, Q.X. Synthesis and characterization of a new organically templated aluminophosphite with a chainlike structure. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2007, 633, 1727–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yi, Z.; Chen, C.; Li, S.; Li, G.; Meng, H.; Cui, Y.; Yang, Y.; Pang, W. Hydrothermal synthesis and structural characterization of the first indium phosphite In2(HPO3)3(H2O). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2005, 8, 166–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, J.; Pang, N.; Su, H.; Pang, S. Two neutral open-framework metal phosphites with ten-ring channels constructed by three-, four-, and five-connected centers. Chem. Lett. 2008, 37, 678–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Huang, L.L.; Song, T.Y.; Fan, Y.; Wang, L.P.; Ji, C.X.; Shan, L.; Wang, L. Synthesis and characterization of a new chiral open-framework indium phosphite with intertwined host and guest helices. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 149, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of compound (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, and (d) 4.
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of compound (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, and (d) 4.
Materials 13 01752 g001
Figure 2. Simulated and experimental X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of compound (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, and (d) 4.
Figure 2. Simulated and experimental X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of compound (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, and (d) 4.
Materials 13 01752 g002
Figure 3. Infrared (IR) spectra of compound (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, and (d) 4.
Figure 3. Infrared (IR) spectra of compound (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, and (d) 4.
Materials 13 01752 g003
Figure 4. The atomic labelling schemes and thermal ellipsoid plots (30%) of compound (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, and (d) 4.
Figure 4. The atomic labelling schemes and thermal ellipsoid plots (30%) of compound (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, and (d) 4.
Materials 13 01752 g004
Figure 5. (a) One-dimensional (1D) chain structure of 1 along the (001) direction. (b) The ABAB dislocated stacking structure of 1 along (010) direction. P, pink; Al, cyan; N, blue; O, red; C, gray. All hydrogen atoms of organic amine are omitted for clarity.
Figure 5. (a) One-dimensional (1D) chain structure of 1 along the (001) direction. (b) The ABAB dislocated stacking structure of 1 along (010) direction. P, pink; Al, cyan; N, blue; O, red; C, gray. All hydrogen atoms of organic amine are omitted for clarity.
Materials 13 01752 g005
Figure 6. (a) 1D chain structure of 2 along the (010) direction. (b) The pseudo-2D structure of 2 with hydrogen bond connections. P, pink; Ga, yellow; N, blue; C, gray; H, white; O, red.
Figure 6. (a) 1D chain structure of 2 along the (010) direction. (b) The pseudo-2D structure of 2 with hydrogen bond connections. P, pink; Ga, yellow; N, blue; C, gray; H, white; O, red.
Materials 13 01752 g006
Figure 7. (a) The pillared-layer structure of 3 along (001) direction. (b) The dense four-ring layer structure of 3 in (101) plane. (c) One-dimensional (1D) four-ring chain containing In2O10 cluster. P, pink; In, green; H, white; O, red.
Figure 7. (a) The pillared-layer structure of 3 along (001) direction. (b) The dense four-ring layer structure of 3 in (101) plane. (c) One-dimensional (1D) four-ring chain containing In2O10 cluster. P, pink; In, green; H, white; O, red.
Materials 13 01752 g007
Figure 8. The seven-ring channels in the (100) direction. P, pink; In, green; H, white; O, red; seven-ring channels, yellow and blue.
Figure 8. The seven-ring channels in the (100) direction. P, pink; In, green; H, white; O, red; seven-ring channels, yellow and blue.
Materials 13 01752 g008
Figure 9. The polyhedron structure of 4 (a) six-ring channel in (001) direction. (b) Eight-ring channel in (100) direction. (c) 10-ring channel in (010) direction. P, pink; In, green; H, white; O, red.
Figure 9. The polyhedron structure of 4 (a) six-ring channel in (001) direction. (b) Eight-ring channel in (100) direction. (c) 10-ring channel in (010) direction. P, pink; In, green; H, white; O, red.
Materials 13 01752 g009
Figure 10. (a) The ABAB layer structure of 4 along (001) direction. (b) The 12-ring windows of 4 in (101) plane. (c) The left-handed helical chain of 4. P, pink; In, green; H, white; O, red.
Figure 10. (a) The ABAB layer structure of 4 along (001) direction. (b) The 12-ring windows of 4 in (101) plane. (c) The left-handed helical chain of 4. P, pink; In, green; H, white; O, red.
Materials 13 01752 g010
Figure 11. The relationship between AB layers. P, pink; In, green; H, white; O, red.
Figure 11. The relationship between AB layers. P, pink; In, green; H, white; O, red.
Materials 13 01752 g011
Figure 12. Thermal gravimetric (TG) curves of compound (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, and (d) 4.
Figure 12. Thermal gravimetric (TG) curves of compound (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, and (d) 4.
Materials 13 01752 g012
Table 1. Crystal data and structure refinement for compounds 1–4.
Table 1. Crystal data and structure refinement for compounds 1–4.
1234
Empirical formulaC8N4H34Al2P4O18 C3N2H17GaP2O8H5In2P3O10H11In2P3O13
Formula weight651.96340.83487.59541.62
Temperature293(2) K293(2) K293(2) K296(2) K
Wavelength0.71073 Å0.71073 Å0.71073 Å0.71073 Å
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, PccnMonoclinic, P21/c Monoclinic, P21Monoclinic, P21
Unit cell dimensionsa = 8.2701(12)Å
b =16.791(2) Å
c = 8.6711(13) Å
α = 90.00°
β = 99.110(4)°
γ = 90.00°
a = 11.084(3) Å
b = 7.093(2) Å
c = 17.352(4) Å
α = 90.00°
β = 119.127(14)°
γ = 90.00°
a = 6.6057(5) Å
b = 10.1900(8) Å
c = 7.5004(6) Å
α = 90.00°
β = 109.4560(10)°
γ = 90.00°
a = 8.0064(5) Å
b = 10.3793(6) Å
c = 8.4640(5) Å
α = 90.00°
β = 113.3540(10)°
γ = 90.00°
Volume1204.1(3) Å31191.7(5) Å3476.04(6) Å3645.74(7) Å3
Z, Calculated density2, 1.704 Mg/m34, 1.889 Mg/m32, 3.402 Mg/m32, 2.775 Mg/m3
Absorption coefficient0.474 mm−12.606 mm−15.385 mm−14.001 mm−1
F(000)612688456512
Crystal size0.21 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm30.22 × 0.20 × 0.19 mm30.21 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm30.21 x 0.20 x 0.18 mm3
Theta range for data collection2.43 to 28.38°2.10 to 28.42°2.88 to 28.31°2.62 to 28.33°
Limiting indices−11 ≤ h ≤ 10, −22 ≤ k ≤ 22, −11 ≤ l ≤ 9−14 ≤ h ≤ 14, −7 ≤ k ≤ 9, −14 ≤ l ≤ 23−7 ≤ h ≤ 8, −12 ≤ k ≤ 13, −10 ≤ l ≤ 7−10 ≤ h ≤ 10, −10 ≤ k ≤ 13, −10 ≤ l ≤ 11
Reflections collected/unique8066/1502 [R(int) = 0.0390]8121/2957 [R(int) = 0.0423]3502/2023 [R(int) = 0.0182]4778/2575 [R(int) = 0.0235]
Completeness to theta = 28.3199.8%98.6%99.9%100.0%
Refinement methodFull-matrix least-squares on F2Full-matrix least-squares on F2Full-matrix least-squares on F2Full-matrix least-squares on F2
Final R indices [I > 2σ(I)]R1 = 0.0591, wR2 = 0.1929R1 = 0.0882, wR2 = 0.2064R1 = 0.0162, wR2 = 0.0408R1 = 0.0209, wR2 = 0.0470
R indices (all data)R1 = 0.0698, wR2 = 0.2029R1 = 0.0945, wR2 = 0.2075R1 = 0.0163, wR2 = 0.0409R1 = 0.0219, wR2 = 0.0474
R1 = ∑|| Fo | − | Fc ||/∑| Fo |. wR2 = {∑[w(Fo2Fc2)2]/∑[w(Fo2)2]}1/2.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Dong, Z.; Meng, C.; Wang, W.; Yang, H.; Zhuo, X.; Yang, S. The Different Effects of Organic Amines on Synthetic Metal Phosphites/Phosphates. Materials 2020, 13, 1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13071752

AMA Style

Wang X, Dong Z, Meng C, Wang W, Yang H, Zhuo X, Yang S. The Different Effects of Organic Amines on Synthetic Metal Phosphites/Phosphates. Materials. 2020; 13(7):1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13071752

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xuelei, Zhaojun Dong, Chao Meng, Wei Wang, Hairui Yang, Xizhun Zhuo, and Shaobin Yang. 2020. "The Different Effects of Organic Amines on Synthetic Metal Phosphites/Phosphates" Materials 13, no. 7: 1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13071752

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop