Next Article in Journal
A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and Undercut
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of CNC Turning with VBMT, RCMX, 3ER, and MGMN Type Indexable Inserts on West African Ebony/Diospyros crassiflora, San Domingo Boxwood/Phyllostylon brasiliense, Rio Rosewood/Dalbergia nigra, Beechwood/Fagus sylvatica, Oakwood/Quercus robur, and Pinewood/Pinus silvestris Surface Roughness
Previous Article in Journal
Innovative Biochar-Based Composite Fibres from Recycled Material
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Long-Term Physical Salt Attack and Multicycle Temperature Gradient on the Mechanical Properties of Spun Concrete
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Influence of Welding Heat Source Inclination on the Melted Zone Shape, Deformations and Stress State of Laser Welded T-Joints

1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, Czestochowa University of Technology, Dabrowskiego 69, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland
2
Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Applied Arts, University of Technology, Rolna 43, 40-555 Katowice, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(18), 5303; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185303
Submission received: 9 August 2021 / Revised: 2 September 2021 / Accepted: 11 September 2021 / Published: 14 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Manufacturing and Mechanics of Materials)

Abstract

:
The paper concerns the numerical analysis of the influence for three different of welding heat source inclinations on the weld pool shape and mechanical properties of the resulting joint. Numerical analysis is based on the experimental tests of single-side welding of two sheets made of X5CrNi18-10 stainless steel. The joint is made using a laser welding heat source. Experimental test was performed for one heating source inclination. As a part of the work metallographic tests are performed on which the quality of obtained joints are determined. Numerical calculations are executed in Abaqus FEA. The same geometrical model is assumed as in the experiment. Material model takes into account changing with temperature thermophysical properties of austenitic steel. Modeling of the motion of heating source is performed in additional subroutine. The welding source parameters are assumed in accordance with the welding process parameters. Numerical calculations were performed for three different inclinations of the source. One inclination is consistent with experimental studies. The performed numerical calculations allowed to determine the temperature field, shape of welding pool as well as deformations and stress state in welded joint. The obtained results are compared to results of the experiment.

1. Introduction

Laser beam used in the welding process is one of rapidly developed technologies in the industry. Laser welding techniques are currently widely used in the automotive, energy, chemical, petrochemical, nuclear, electronic and many other industries. Concentrated laser beam heat sources provide a narrow fusion zone (FZ) and a small heat affected zone (HAZ), which reduces the deformation of welded construction pieces in comparison to conventional welding methods. The use of laser techniques allows one to perform precise welds using extremely high welding speeds and low deformations. Therefore, the obtained joints do not require additional post processing. Laser welding is widely used in large-size constructions having innovative solutions for joining elements with complex shapes and in joint of elements made of various materials with different thermomechanical properties. The growing requirements to the quality of manufactured joints result in intensive experimental and numerical research on the laser welding process in a wide range, like the type of joints, process parameters or joined materials [1,2,3,4,5,6,7].
Large structures are created on automated production lines in production plants, where various types of welded joints are used. T-joints are a one of the most commonly used type of welded joints in large-size welded constructions. T-joints are classically performed with arc methods like fillet welding, in which it is necessary to use an additional material during the welding process. An important factor in such welding processes is the high thermal load of the element, which has an impact on the shape of the welding pool, strength properties of the joint and its weight. Low welding speeds with arc methods additionally increase production costs. The use of modern welding equipment in the production process like a laser beam has significantly increased the production capacity of T-joints [8,9,10,11,12]. Laser methods allow T-joints to be made using various welding techniques, such as classic joints with the use of double-side and single-side fillet welds, with or without additional material as well as T-joints with the use of butt-welds. The I-core T-joint is an innovative solution, in which the material is melted by laser through the flange of T-bar creating a fused “nail”, connecting elements [13,14,15]. Performed research on T-joints (numerical as well as experimental) concerns the analysis of physical phenomena in welding processes and the analysis of T-joints in complex large-size industrial constructions.
Coupled thermo-mechanical phenomena occur in a wide temperature range during the laser beam welding process, having an impact on the joint quality [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. The strength, deformation and load-bearing capacity of welded joints are influenced by the volume and shape of FZ, which depend on the welding parameters: mainly welding speed and the amount of heat supplied to the material. It is necessary to set-up joined materials precisely in the case of laser welding without the use of additional material and with no gap between joined parts.
The formation of a gap between the connected elements may lead to the formation of a concave face of the weld, which is adverse in welded joint. The analysis of welding parameters is carried out using numerical methods, replacing expensive experimental studies in this area. Numerical simulations allow one to test various welding parameters that affect the welding process in terms of joint deformation and mechanical properties in relation to welding technique and the behavior of material of welded elements used in the process. The adaption of real process conditions in a discrete model requires the development of appropriate mathematical models and numerical solutions [23,24,25,26]. An important step of numerical modeling is the assumption of an appropriate mathematical model of laser beam power distribution heating joined parts, the direction and method of its acting on the material, and the proper selection of process parameters. Developed mathematical and numerical models should be verified by comparing obtained simulation results with experimentally measured data, such as: the shape and size of the melted zone and heat affected zone, the value of deformation and the level of residual stresses in joined elements [27,28,29]. Modeling the welding of T-joint requires consideration of the welding source inclination in computational model. The selection of appropriate parameters is ensured by experimental verification.
The work presents a numerical analysis of the influence of welding heat source inclination on the weld pool shape, stress state and welding deformation of the welded joint.
Numerical modeling of phenomena occurring in fillet welding process of a T-joint using a laser beam welding source. One of the basic parameters that has a significant impact on the quality of the joint and mechanical properties is the inclination of the welding beam. Numerical calculations were performed for three different source inclinations α = 20°, 30°and 40°. The starting point for the conducted research is a real welding experiment made using laser beam for one chosen inclination. The parameters accepted in real welding process are further used as input data to the numerical solution program. A computational model of thermomechanical phenomena of the welding process is developed with the use of the real process parameters. Numerical simulations are carried out to determine the size and shape of FZ and the deformation of the joint. Numerical simulations are made in commercial computational software Abaqus solver [30] with additional, self-made numerical subroutines. Based on the developed model, simulation calculations were carried out for the other two inclinations of the source.

2. The Experiment

T-joint welding processes were carried out at Research Network Łukasiewicz–Welding Institute in Gliwice. The joined elements in the welded T-joints are two flat bars of different thickness (150 mm × 30 mm × 3 mm and 150 mm × 30 mm × 1 mm), made of X5CrNi18-10 stainless steel. The flat bars are welded on one side using welding station equipped with a CO2 laser. A welded joint and its cross-section are presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively.
The following parameters are used in the welding process of the T-joints: laser beam source power 2100 W (read from the device during the process) and the source travel speed 1.5 m/min. The inclination angle of the welding beam is applied by 20° to the horizontal flange of the joint in order to obtain a fillet weld. The laser welding process of the T-joint was carried out with the use of argon shielding gas flow rate16 L/min.
As part of the experimental tests, the deformation of the welded joint was measured (Figure 3). The measurement of a shape of the deformed flange of T-joint was conducted in Surface Layer Laboratory in Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Science. A precise scanning profilometer Hommel-Etamic T8000 Nanoscan (Jena, Germany) was used. It enables high accuracy measurements. The maximum vertical resolution is less than 1 nm and the maximum lateral resolution equals 0.01 and 0.5 μm in the x- and y-direction, respectively. The scanned area was 27 mm in y direction and 145 mm in the x-direction and was therefore slightly smaller than that of the flange. Since we captured only the shape (a waviness, not a roughness) of the flange, we used a lower measurement resolution of 5 μm in the x-direction and 1.8 mm in the y-direction. The scanning speed was 0.5 mm/s. On the basis of the registered measurement data extract surface profiles in any direction can be obtained.
The measurements were carried out for three measurement lines in the perpendicular direction to the welding line. Figure 4a shows the measurement lines. The test results are presented in the diagram shown in Figure 4b.

3. Mathematical Model

The thermal analysis is based on the classical heat transfer equation, given in weighted residuals criterion method [30]:
V ρ U t δ T d V + V δ T x α ( λ T x α ) d V = = V δ T   q V d V + S δ T   q S d S
where λ = λ(T) is thermal conductivity (W/mK), U = U(T) is internal energy (J/kg), δT is variational function, ρ is density (kg/m3), qv is volumetric heat source (W/m3), qs is a surface heat flux (W/m2).
Equation (1) is completed by boundary conditions and the initial condition t = 0: T = To, taking into account convection and radiation:
T | Γ = T ˜ q S y m = λ T n = 0 q S = λ T n = α k ( T | Γ T 0 ) + ε σ ( T | Γ 4 T 0 4 )
where q(r, 0) is heat flux at the top surface (z = 0) within the radius r, T0 is an ambient temperature, αk is convective coefficient (W/m2K), ε is radiation, σ is the Stefan-Boltzman constant.
The latent heat of fusion HL = 260 × 103 (J/kg) is assumed in numerical simulations in the solidus-liquidus temperatures range (TS = 1673 K; TL = 1728 K).
Assuming an appropriate mathematical model of power distribution of the heating source is an important step in developing the numerical model. Modeling of a moveable welding source is performed by implementing DFLUX subroutine (ver.1.1) into the Abaqus computational solver. A volumetric model of the source power distribution is included in the subroutine as well as welding speed and direction. In this work, Gaussian model with an energy distribution changing linearly with the material thickness is used to describe the laser beam power intensity distribution [31,32]:
Q v ( r , z ) = P η π   r o 2 h 1 exp [ 1 r 2 r o 2 ] ( 1 z d )
in which:
r o = r t ( r t r b ) z h 1
where P is a laser power (W), r0 is a laser beam radius (m), η is efficiency of welding processes, d is material penetration depth (m), r is actual radius (m), where r = x 2 + y 2 , rt and rb is beam radius, respectively for z = 0 and z = h1, h1 is a height of heat source penetration and z is actual depth of penetration (m) [32].
According to experimental research, the numerical model described by Equation (3) assumes a linear decrease of source energy with the depth of penetration of the material by the laser beam. The volume of laser source in the form of a truncated cone is assumed (Figure 5). Performing a fillet weld between the connected flat bars required inclination of the welding source. Therefore, numerical modelling of fillet welded also requires the inclination angle of the laser beam heat source distribution axis. It is necessary to transform the vertical axis of the beam source by the angle α adopted in the experiment. The transformation of the coordinate system is performed in DFLUX subroutine. The schema of heat source coordinate transformation is shown in Figure 6.
The transformation of welding source power distribution is carried out using transformation model:
A i = γ i j   A j w h e r e γ i j = e i   e j
Equations of coordinates transformations are obtained after the solution of presented transformation matrix from the basic system (x, y, z) to the rotated system (x1, y1, z1):
{ x = x o y =   cos   α   y 1 + sin   α   z 1 z = sin α   y 1 + cos α   z 1
In mechanical analysis, the temperature field obtained from the heat analysis is taken as the thermal load. Calculations of mechanical phenomena are carried out in the elastic-plastic range and are based on the equilibrium Equation (7). Governing equations are supplemented by constitutive relations describing the relationship between stresses and strains. Initial and boundary conditions are taken into account in the calculations [33,34,35,36]:
σ ˙ ( x α , t ) = 0 , σ ˙ = σ ˙ T σ ˙ = D ε ˙ e + D ˙ ε e
where σ = σij) is Cauchy stress tensor, xα is location of considered point, D = D(T) is a stiffness matrix. The total strain rate is decomposed by its constituents: elastic strain εe, plastic strain εp and thermal strain εTh.

4. Numerical Simulation

Numerical calculations for all case inclination of heat source are performed in Abaqus/Standard solver, extended with additional, self-made numerical subroutines. The discrete model is developed on the basis of the geometry used in experimental research. Varying with temperature material properties of X5CrNi18-10 austenitic steel are used in the material module of Abaqus. The modified Gauss model presented in Section 3 is included into the DFLUX subroutine. Laser beam power, welding speed, the inclination of laser beam are assumed on the basis of experimental research. 3D numerical model of analyzed case is developed for computer simulations of the process. The scheme of the analyzed domain is shown in Figure 7.
The dimensions of the numerical model are adopted in accordance with the experiment. The parameters of the heating source are assumed in accordance with the technological parameters of the welding process: beam power Q = 2100 W, beam inclination angle α = 20°, source travel speed v = 1.5 m/min. The influence of the source inclination on the weld pool shape and mechanical properties was analyzed. Three different source slope were adopted in the numerical simulation: α = 20°, 30° and 40°.
The Abaqus materials module takes into account changes of physical properties of welded element in the function of temperature and heat convection coefficient k = 100 W/m2. The thermomechanical properties of the welded T-joint presented in Figure 8 are assumed in numerical simulations for austenitic steel X5CrNi18-10 [32]. Chemical composition: 0.06 C, 17–19 Cr, 11–13 Ni, N < 0.11 [%].
The discrete model prepared in the software together with the finite element mesh (FEM) is present in Figure 9.
The densest finite element mesh is concentrated in the place of the greatest temperature gradients. The mesh changes linearly, increasing the size of the element with the distance from the weld line. About 370,000 finite elements are used in the developed model. The created finite element mesh allows us to minimize the duration of the numerical simulation while maintaining good quality simulation results. A simplification by applying the perfect contact between two joined surfaces is assumed in computer simulations. The analysis of thermomechanical phenomena is carried out using the “uncoupled” method. First, calculation of temperature field is carried out, followed by numerical analysis of mechanical phenomena. The results from the thermal analysis are the input data for the mechanical analysis. The mechanical boundary conditions were adopted in accordance with the boundary conditions contained in publication [34].
The temperature field and the shape of the FZ are numerically estimated. Figure 10 shows the temperature distribution in the general view for two different process duration times t = 3 s and t = 5 s. For the result presented in Figure 11, the beam inclination angle was α = 20°. For the same slope, Figure 11 shows the temperature field in ZY plane of the welded T-joint. In order to compare the results of numerical prediction with experimental tests, the boundary of melted zone (TL ≈ 1455 °C) is marked with a solid line. The numerically estimated shape of the weld is marked on the macroscopic picture of the joint. The comparison of FZ geometry with macroscopic view shows that a good representation of the weld shape is obtained. Good compliance of the calculation results with the experiment is obtained for the following source parameters: source penetration depth d = 2.8 mm, beam radius rt = 0.2 mm (for z = 0), beam radius rb = 0.08 mm (for z = h1), h1 = 4 mm.
The compatibility of results of numerical calculations and results of the experiment indicate the correctness of selected welding process parameters, as well as the correctness of the theoretical approach.
Deformations resulting from the heat load during welding are estimated on the basis of the determined temperature field for a welded T-joint. The analysis of mechanical properties of the joint was also carried out for three heat source inclinations.
On the basis of the simulations carried out in the Abaqus FEA program (ver.6.10) of mechanical phenomena, the stress state and the displacement field of the welded T-joint were determined. Figure 12a present temporary reduced stresses, while Figure 12b presents residual stresses.
The maximum value of these stresses is less than 220 MPa. The maximum concentration of stresses occurs in the welding line. The displacement area is numerically estimated for welded T-joint. Figure 13 shows the displacement field in the general view. Figure 13a shows averaged displacements, while Figure 13b shows vertical displacements (in accordance with the Y-axis). The largest displacements of 0.5 mm occur at the ends of edges of T-joint legs in final parts of welded joint.
Analysis of presented results of numerical prediction shows that the greatest values of displacements occur in the direction perpendicular to the weld line.
Figure 14 shows a macroscopic picture of welded joint, which marked thicknesses of joined flat bars, the axis of the weld is inclined at an angle α = 20° and dashed lines that indicate the shape of the system before welding. The comparison of plotted lines with the cross-sectional view of welded joint shows that both ends of the legs of T-joint and the vertical element of T-joint are displaced.
Figure 15 shows the displacements in the cross-section of analyzed T-joint. The numerically predicted directions of displacements confirm the results of the experiment (Figure 15). The arms of T-joint suffered the greatest displacements. The maximum value displacements in cross-section (the center of T-joint length) is 0.3 mm. Numerically estimated values of displacements well agree with experimental values. Figure 16 presents the results of numerical calculations of thermal phenomena for three different inclinations of the welding source.
Analyzing the results of the simulation of thermal phenomena presented in Figure 16, it can be concluded that the change in the beam inclination has a significant impact on the shape of the weld pool. Increasing the angle of inclination of the beam results increased penetration of the lower part T-joint which is most visible with the slope α = 40°. Changing the angle of inclination also reduces the melted zone on the opposite side of the vertical element of T-joint. Further increasing the angle of inclination may prevent full penetration. This contributes to the decrease of the quality of the welded joint.
The results of stress state and forecasting of the displacement of a welded T-joint are presented in the following figures. The results presented in these figures are determined for nine measurement lines, in accordance with the diagram shown in Figure 17.
Figure 18, Figure 19 and Figure 20 show the diagrams of residual stresses for the source inclinations α = 20°, 30° and 40°, respectively. Figure 18a, Figure 19a and Figure 20a show the results for lines (lines 1, 2, 3) perpendicular to the weld line of the joint, whereas Figure 18b, Figure 19b and Figure 20b describe the results for lines parallel to the welding lines (lines of the measurement 4–9).
The comparison of presented figures of reduced stresses, shows that the change in the inclination of the source has no significant effect on the change in the value of stresses in the joint. The difference between the values is approximately 5 MPa. Figure 21, Figure 22 and Figure 23 show the diagrams of displacement Uy for the source inclinations α = 20°, 30° and 40°, respectively. Figure 21a, Figure 22a and Figure 23a show the results for lines (lines 1, 2, 3) perpendicular to the weld line of the joint. Whereas Figure 21b, Figure 22b and Figure 23b describe the results for lines parallel to the welding lines (measuring lines 4–9).
The laser welded T-joint undergoes transverse and longitudinal deformation. The greatest displacements Uy occur in the direction perpendicular to the welding line. The differences in the obtained results are slight. Obtained simulation results are compared in Figure 24 in order to visualize the differences between displacement Uy.
From the comparison of the simulation results shown in Figure 24, it can be noticed that the change of the beam inclination reduces the value of Uy displacements. For the analyzed model difference between slope α = 20° and 30° is about 0.03 mm.

5. Conclusions

Performing single-side laser beam welding of T-joints requires the selection of the correct heat source angle inclination to ensure a durable, good-quality joint. Determination of the influence of the inclination angle on the shape and size of melted zone by experimental research is very time-consuming and expensive. Abaqus FEA software is used for numerical modeling of the laser welding process of single-side welded T-joint. Development of a numerical model requires careful analysis of specific process conditions. The concept of using the basic welding process parameters from the experiment in simulations is crucial for verification of the model and allows for further correct prediction of the welding process parameters for various inclination angles. The paper presents the results of numerical prediction of the size and shape of melted zone, deformation and residual stresses of single-side welded T- joints for three different inclinations of the heat source. The end edges of the T-joint are subject to the greatest deformations. The maximum displacement values in the entire T-joint are 0.5 mm (Figure 13 and Figure 15). Results of calculated displacement are compared with displacements obtained in the experiment (Figure 15). As shown in these figures, a good consistency of the results of numerical calculations of deformation with the results of experimental tests is obtained.
From the analysis of the influence of changing the inclination of the heat source on the weld pool shape, deformation and stress state of the joint, the following practical conclusions can be reached:
  • Changing the inclination of the heat source changes the shape and size of the melted zone. As the angle of inclination increases, the depth of fusion into the base of T-joint increases, and the width of the fusion zone decreases at the same time. A further increase in the angle of inclination of the source may lead to a reduction of the quality of the joint (see Figure 16).
  • Changing the inclination of the heat source changes the deformation of the joint. Increasing the angle of inclination reduces the amount of deformation (Figure 24). For the analyzed joint, the differences are at the level of 0.03 mm.
  • Changing the inclination of the heat source has no significant effect on the stress state (see Figure 18, Figure 19 and Figure 20). In general, increasing the angle of inclination of the heat source slightly increases residual stress. The predicted magnitudes and distributions of are determined only by numerical simulations, according to the model adopted in the Abaqus FEA software. Detailed analysis of the stress state in single-side welded T-joint requires experimental verification. Stress measurement in T-joints is complex, requires special equipment and will be the subject of further research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.P. and Z.S.; methodology, Z.S., W.P., M.K. and T.D.; software, Z.S. and M.K.; validation, Z.S., W.P., M.K. and T.D.; formal analysis, W.P. and M.K.; investigation, Z.S. and M.K.; resources, T.D.; data curation, Z.S., M.K. and T.D.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.S. and T.D.; writing—review and editing, W.P., M.K. and T.D.; visualization, Z.S. and T.D.; supervision, W.P. and T.D.; project administration, W.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huang, H.; Wang, J.; Li, L.; Ma, N. Prediction of laser welding induced deformation in thin sheets by effcient numerical modeling. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2016, 227, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, Y.; Wang, K.; Jin, Y.; Xu, M.; Lu, H. Prediction of welding deformation in stiffened structure by intro ducing thermo-mechanical interface element. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2015, 216, 440–446. [Google Scholar]
  3. Torkamany, M.J.; Sabbaghzadeh, J.; Hamedi, M.J. Effect of laser welding mode on the microstructure and mechanical performance of dissimilar laser spot welds between low carbon and austenitic stainless steels. Mater. Des. 2012, 34, 666–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Danielewski, H.; Skrzypczyk, A. Steel Sheets Laser Lap Joint Welding—Process Analysis. Materials 2020, 13, 2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khan, M.M.A.; Romoli, L.; Dini, G. Laser beam welding of dissimilar ferritic/martensitic stainless steels in a butt joint configuration. Opt. Laser Technol. 2013, 49, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Francis, J.A.; Holtum, N.; Olschok, S.; Roy, M.J.; Vasileiou, A.N.; Jakobs, S.; Reisgen, U.; Smith, M.C. Vacuum laser welding of SA508 steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2019, 274, 116269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Danielewski, H.; Skrzypczyk, A.; Hebda, M.; Tofil, S.; Witkowski, G.; Długosz, P.; Nigrovic, R. Numerical and metallurgical analysis of laser welded, sealed lap joints of S355J2 and 316L steels under different configurations. Materials 2020, 13, 5819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, C.; Li, S.; Hu, L.; Deng, D. Effects of pass arrangement on angular distortion, residual stresses and lamellar tearing tendency in thick-plate T-joints of low alloy steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2019, 274, 116293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Y.; Tao, W.; Chen, Y.; Nan, T. Effects of heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of double-sided laser-welded AA2060/AA2099 T-Joint. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2020, 285, 116777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hammada, A.; Churiaqueb, C.; Sanchez-Amayab, J.; Abdel-Nasser, Y. Experimental and numerical investigation of hybrid laser arc welding process and the influence of welding sequence on the manufacture of stiffened flat panels. J. Manu Process. 2021, 61, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shanmugam, N.S.; Buvanashekaran, G.; Sankaranarayanasamy, K.; Kumar, S.R. A transient finite element simulation of the temperature and bead profiles of T-joint laser welds. Mater. Design. 2010, 31, 4528–4542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Unt, A.; Poutiainen, I.; Salminen, A. Effects of sealing run welding with defocused laser beam on the quality of T-joint fillet weld. Phys. Procedia 2014, 56, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kujala, P.; Klanac, A. Steel Sandwich Panels in Marine Applications. BrodoGradnja 2005, 56, 305–314. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kozak, J. All steel sandwich panels—New possibilities introduced by laser welding techniques. Weld. Technol. Rev. 2007, 10, 53–59. [Google Scholar]
  15. Piekarska, W.; Kubiak, M.; Saternus, Z. Numerical Simulation of Deformations in T-Joint Welded by the Laser Beam. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2013, 58, 1391–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Macckwood, A.P.; Cafer, R.C. Thermal modeling of laser of laser welding and related processes: A literature review. Opt. Laser Technol. 2009, 37, 99–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Banik, S.; Kumar, S.; Kumar Singh, P.; Bhattacharya, S.; Mahapatra, M.M. Distortion and residual stresses in thick plate weld joint of austenitic stainless steel: Experiments and analysis. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2021, 289, 116944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. The infuence of welding mechanical boundary condition on the residual stress and distortion of a stiffened-panel. Mar. Struct. 2019, 65, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Geng, S.; Jiang, P.; Shao, X.; Guo, L.; Gao, X. Heat transfer and fluid flow and their effects on the solidification microstructure in full-penetration laser welding of aluminum sheet. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 46, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Svenungssona, J.; Choqueta, I.; Kaplan, A.F.H. Laser welding process—a review of keyhole welding modeling. Phys. Procedia 2015, 78, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. De, A.; Maiti, S.K.; Walsh, C.A.; Bhadesia, K.D.H. Finite element simulation of laser spot welding. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 2003, 8, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Oliveira, A.C.; Siqueira, R.H.M.; Riva, R.; Lima, M.S.F. One-sided laser beam welding of autogenous T-joints for 6013-T4 aluminium alloy. Mater. Des. 2015, 65, 726–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Deng, D.; Murakawa, H. Prediction of welding distortion and residual stress in a thin plate butt-welded joint. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2008, 43, 353–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Deng, D.; Liang, W.; Murakawa, H. Determination of welding deformation in fillet-welded joint by means of numerical simulation and comparison with experimental measurements, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2007, 183, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dowden, J.M. The Mathematics of Thermal Modeling; Taylor & Francis Group: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  26. Moumni, Z.; Roger, F.; Thuy Trinh, N. Theoretical and numerical modeling of the thermomechanical and metallurgical behavior of steel. Int. J. Plast. 2011, 27, 414–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rong, Y.; Huang, Y.; Wang, L. Evolution mechanism of transient strain and residual stress distribution in al 6061 laser welding. Crystals 2021, 11, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rong, Y.; Xu, J.; Lei, T.; Huang, Y.; Shao, X.; Wang, C. Magnetism aided mitigation of deformation and residual stress in dissimilar joint 316L with EH36. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2018, 259, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rong, Y.; Lei, T.; Xu, J.; Huang, Y.; Wang, C. Residual stress modelling in laser welding marine steel EH36 considering a thermodynamics-based solid phase transformation. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2018, 146–147, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dassault System. Abaqus Theory Manual; Version 6.7; SIMULIA: Johnston, RI, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tsirkas, S.A.; Papanikos, P.; Kermanidis, T. Numerical simulation of the laser welding process in butt-joint specimens. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2003, 134, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Piekarska, W.; Kubiak, M.; Saternus, Z.; Stano, D.T. Numerical prediction of deformations in laser welded sheets made of X5CrNi18-10 steel. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2015, 60, 1965–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ahn, J.; Davies, C.M.; He, E.; Wimpory, R.C.; Chen, L.; Dear, J.P. Prediction and measurement of residual stresses and distortions in fibre laser welded Ti-6Al-4V considering phase transformation. Mater. Des. 2017, 117, 441–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guoxiang, X.; Chuansong, W.; Xuezhou, M.; Xuyou, W. Numerical analysis of welding residual stress and distortion in laser+GMAW hybrid welding of aluminum alloy T-joint. Acta Metall. Sin. 2013, 26, 352–360. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zienkiewicz, O.C.; Taylor, R.L. The Finite Element Method, 5th ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  36. Rohde, J.; Jeppsson, A. Literature review of heat treatment simulations with respect to phase transformation, residual stresses and distortion. Scand. J. Metall. 2000, 29, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Single-side welded T-joint.
Figure 1. Single-side welded T-joint.
Materials 14 05303 g001
Figure 2. T-joint macrostructure in the cross-section.
Figure 2. T-joint macrostructure in the cross-section.
Materials 14 05303 g002
Figure 3. Displacement measuring system.
Figure 3. Displacement measuring system.
Materials 14 05303 g003
Figure 4. Scheme of lines of the measurement (a), measurement results (b).
Figure 4. Scheme of lines of the measurement (a), measurement results (b).
Materials 14 05303 g004
Figure 5. Scheme of laser beam heat flux distribution.
Figure 5. Scheme of laser beam heat flux distribution.
Materials 14 05303 g005
Figure 6. The schema of heat source coordinate transformation.
Figure 6. The schema of heat source coordinate transformation.
Materials 14 05303 g006
Figure 7. Scheme of analyzed domain.
Figure 7. Scheme of analyzed domain.
Materials 14 05303 g007
Figure 8. Thermomechanical properties assumed in calculations [32].
Figure 8. Thermomechanical properties assumed in calculations [32].
Materials 14 05303 g008
Figure 9. Scheme of analyzed domain. Discrete model with a FEM.
Figure 9. Scheme of analyzed domain. Discrete model with a FEM.
Materials 14 05303 g009
Figure 10. Temperature distribution in welded joint (a) t = 3 s, (b) t = 5 s (inclination angle α = 20°).
Figure 10. Temperature distribution in welded joint (a) t = 3 s, (b) t = 5 s (inclination angle α = 20°).
Materials 14 05303 g010
Figure 11. Temperature field in the joint cross-section and comparison of FZ with the experiment.
Figure 11. Temperature field in the joint cross-section and comparison of FZ with the experiment.
Materials 14 05303 g011
Figure 12. Residual temporary reduced stress (a) and reduced residual stress (b) of laser welded joint.
Figure 12. Residual temporary reduced stress (a) and reduced residual stress (b) of laser welded joint.
Materials 14 05303 g012
Figure 13. Displacement (a) average, (b) in Y-axis direction.
Figure 13. Displacement (a) average, (b) in Y-axis direction.
Materials 14 05303 g013
Figure 14. T-joint macrostructure in cross-section with shape marked before welding.
Figure 14. T-joint macrostructure in cross-section with shape marked before welding.
Materials 14 05303 g014
Figure 15. Compare numerical results with experience.
Figure 15. Compare numerical results with experience.
Materials 14 05303 g015
Figure 16. Comparison of the simulation results of thermal phenomena for different slopes of the heating source.
Figure 16. Comparison of the simulation results of thermal phenomena for different slopes of the heating source.
Materials 14 05303 g016
Figure 17. Scheme of measurement lines.
Figure 17. Scheme of measurement lines.
Materials 14 05303 g017
Figure 18. Reduced residual stress σ for slope α = 20°. (a) transverse direction to the welding line (b) along the welding line.
Figure 18. Reduced residual stress σ for slope α = 20°. (a) transverse direction to the welding line (b) along the welding line.
Materials 14 05303 g018
Figure 19. Reduced residual stress σ for slope α = 30°. (a) transverse direction to the welding line (b) along the welding line.
Figure 19. Reduced residual stress σ for slope α = 30°. (a) transverse direction to the welding line (b) along the welding line.
Materials 14 05303 g019
Figure 20. Reduced residual stress σ for slope α = 40°. (a) transverse direction to the welding line (b) along the welding line.
Figure 20. Reduced residual stress σ for slope α = 40°. (a) transverse direction to the welding line (b) along the welding line.
Materials 14 05303 g020
Figure 21. Numerically estimated displacement Uy in laser welded T-joint for slope α = 20°. (a) transverse direction to the welding line (b) along the welding line.
Figure 21. Numerically estimated displacement Uy in laser welded T-joint for slope α = 20°. (a) transverse direction to the welding line (b) along the welding line.
Materials 14 05303 g021
Figure 22. Numerically estimated displacement Uy in laser welded T-joint for slope α = 30°. (a) transverse direction to the welding line (b) along the welding line.
Figure 22. Numerically estimated displacement Uy in laser welded T-joint for slope α = 30°. (a) transverse direction to the welding line (b) along the welding line.
Materials 14 05303 g022
Figure 23. Numerically estimated displacement Uy in laser welded T-joint for slope α = 40°. (a) transverse direction to the welding line (b) along the welding line.
Figure 23. Numerically estimated displacement Uy in laser welded T-joint for slope α = 40°. (a) transverse direction to the welding line (b) along the welding line.
Materials 14 05303 g023
Figure 24. Comparison of numerically predicted displacement Uy for three different slopes α = 20°, 30° and 40°.
Figure 24. Comparison of numerically predicted displacement Uy for three different slopes α = 20°, 30° and 40°.
Materials 14 05303 g024
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saternus, Z.; Piekarska, W.; Kubiak, M.; Domański, T. The Influence of Welding Heat Source Inclination on the Melted Zone Shape, Deformations and Stress State of Laser Welded T-Joints. Materials 2021, 14, 5303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185303

AMA Style

Saternus Z, Piekarska W, Kubiak M, Domański T. The Influence of Welding Heat Source Inclination on the Melted Zone Shape, Deformations and Stress State of Laser Welded T-Joints. Materials. 2021; 14(18):5303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185303

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saternus, Zbigniew, Wiesława Piekarska, Marcin Kubiak, and Tomasz Domański. 2021. "The Influence of Welding Heat Source Inclination on the Melted Zone Shape, Deformations and Stress State of Laser Welded T-Joints" Materials 14, no. 18: 5303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185303

APA Style

Saternus, Z., Piekarska, W., Kubiak, M., & Domański, T. (2021). The Influence of Welding Heat Source Inclination on the Melted Zone Shape, Deformations and Stress State of Laser Welded T-Joints. Materials, 14(18), 5303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185303

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop