Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Temper Condition and Feeding Speed on the Additive Manufacturing of AA2011 Parts Using Friction Stir Deposition
Next Article in Special Issue
The Properties of Lightweight Aggregates Pre-Coated with Cement Pastes and Their Suitability for Concrete
Previous Article in Journal
An Acylhydrazone-Based Fluorescent Sensor for Sequential Recognition of Al3+ and H2PO4−
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characteristics of Mortars with Blast Furnace Slag Powder and Mixed Fine Aggregates Containing Ferronickel-Slag Aggregate
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 21
10.3390/ma14216395
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Strength, Carbonation Resistance, and Chloride-Ion Penetrability of Cement Mortars Containing Catechol-Functionalized Chitosan Polymer

by
Se-Jin Choi
1,
Sung-Ho Bae
1,
Jae-In Lee
1,
Eun-Ji Bang
2 and
Haye-Min Ko
3,*
1
Department of Architectural Engineering, Wonkwang University, Iksan 54538, Korea
2
Department of Chemistry, Wonkwang University, Iksan 54538, Korea
3
Department of Chemistry, Wonkwang Institute of Material Science and Technology, Wonkwang University, Iksan 54538, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(21), 6395; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216395
Submission received: 22 September 2021 / Revised: 20 October 2021 / Accepted: 21 October 2021 / Published: 25 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Various Substitute Aggregate Materials for Sustainable Concrete)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
There have been numerous recent studies on improving the mechanical properties and durability of cement composites by mixing them with functional polymers. However, research into applying modified biopolymer such as catechol-functionalized chitosan to cement mortar or concrete is rare to the best of our knowledge. In this study, catechol-functionalized chitosan (Cat-Chit), a well-known bioinspired polymer that imitates the basic structures and functions of living organisms and biological materials in nature, was synthesized and combined with cement mortar in various proportions. The compressive strength, tensile strength, drying shrinkage, accelerated carbonation depth, and chloride-ion penetrability of these mixes were then evaluated. In the ultraviolet–visible spectra, a maximum absorption peak appeared at 280 nm, corresponding to catechol conjugation. The sample containing 7.5% Cat-Chit polymer in water (CPW) exhibited the highest compressive strength, and its 28-day compressive strength was ~20.2% higher than that of a control sample with no added polymer. The tensile strength of the samples containing 5% or more CPW was ~2.3–11.5% higher than that of the control sample. Additionally, all the Cat-Chit polymer mixtures exhibited lower carbonation depths than compared to the control sample. The total charge passing through the samples decreased as the amount of CPW increased. Thus, incorporating this polymer effectively improved the mechanical properties, carbonation resistance, and chloride-ion penetration resistance of cement mortar.

1. Introduction

Concrete is a widely used material in the construction field for its many advantages, such as its low cost, excellent compressive strength, and high durability [1]. However, its tensile strength is low, and it is vulnerable to cracks due to various causes, such as shrinkage or chemical reactions. In addition, maintenance activities, such as repairing cracks, can be significantly costly [2]. Over the past decade, numerous studies have developed various functional admixtures (shrinkage-reducing agents, watertight admixtures, etc.), fiber reinforcements (e.g., Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fiber and amorphous metallic fiber), and polymer materials to overcome these problems in cement mortar or concrete [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10].
Recently, various research studies have mixed functional polymers into cement composites in order to enhance the mechanical properties and durability of cement composites [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Jo et al. [11] examined the characteristics of polymer concrete using unsaturated polyester resins from recycled polyethylene terephthalate plastic waste and recycled concrete aggregate; they reported that the strength of polymer concrete increased as the resin content increased. Ferdous et al. [12] investigated the effect of the resin-to-filler ratio on the mechanical properties of epoxy-based polymer concrete, and they found that the resin-to-filler ratio significantly affects the spatial distribution of aggregates. Meanwhile, Azadmanesh et al. [13] used a polymer of styrene butadiene rubber and ethylene vinyl acetate to improve the mechanical properties of Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) using unoiled fibers. Their findings showed that the use of polymers can significantly improve the tensile and flexural strength properties of ECC. Mohesson et al. [14] characterized concrete mixed with alginate (a biopolymer), which increased both the compressive and tensile strengths of the concrete. In addition, Shanmugavel et al. [15] reported that adding biopolymers from cactus extract to cement paste increased both the viscosity and durability of the concrete.
However, in general, most studies employed conventional resin, epoxy, etc., as polymer additives in cement composites, but no studies have specifically focused on applying modified bioinspired polymers to cement mortar or concrete.
In this study, catechol-functionalized chitosan (Cat-Chit), a well-known bioinspired polymer that imitates the basic structures and functions of living organisms and biological materials in nature, was synthesized to examine its applicability in cement mortar. Chitosan, the most popular biopolymer, is obtained by the deacetylation of chitin, which is widely found in crustaceans. In recent decades, the applications of Cat-Chit in biomedicine have been well established, such as tissue adhesives [20] and drug delivery systems [21], because of its medical benefits as well as its low toxicity and biodegradability. However, its low solubility in aqueous solutions hindered its further advancement in this field [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. In order to overcome this critical issue, chitosan-based derivatives have been synthesized via amide formation with 3,4-dihydroxyhydrocinnamic acid and amine [20,21,29,30,31,32]. The catechol group in the chitosan backbone increases not only its solubility but also its adhesion to tissues. Cat-Chit polymers (CCPs) have also been modified by using several nanoparticles [33,34]. These results have attracted significant attention to CCPs owing to its superior capability as a versatile material.
Therefore, in this study, we synthesized a catechol-functionalized chitosan polymer (CCP) and examined its applicability to cement mortar. To this end, we analyzed this CCP, and we evaluated mortar samples containing CCP in terms of their compressive strength, tensile strength, drying shrinkage, accelerated carbonation depth, and chloride-ion penetrability.

2. Materials and Experimental Methods

2.1. Materials

In order to synthesize CCP, Chitosan (medium molecular weight; degree of deacetylation: 75–85%) and hydrocaffeic acid (HCA; 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)propionic acid) [35] were used in this study. In addition, we used 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) and ethanol. All the chemicals were of analytical grade and were used without further purification. A Q-Grad 1 purification cartridge from Millipore water purification systems was used to obtain ultrapure water.
In addition, we used ASTM typeⅠordinary Portland cement with a specific gravity of 3.15 made by Asia Co. (Seoul, Korea). Table 1 lists its chemical composition. For fine aggregates, sand from the Namwon region with a specific gravity of 2.6 and a fineness modulus of 2.89 was used. Figure 1 shows the particle size distribution of the fine aggregate.

2.2. Mix Proportions and Specimen Preparation

Table 2 lists the mix proportions used in this study. The water–cement ratio (W/C) was fixed at 50%, which is widely used for conventional concrete. A CCP solution, in which 500 mg of CCP was dissolved in 1000 mL of water (hereinafter, CPW), was mixed at proportions of 0%, 2.5%, 5.0%, 7.5%, and 10.0% of mixing water. For the sake of simplicity, samples are labeled with a suffix indicating the amount of CPW, e.g., CPW2.5 contained 2.5% CPW, as shown in Table 2. These CPW dosages correspond to 1.25% (CPW2.5) and to 5.0% (CPW10) of the cement weight.
A mechanical mixer was used to mix the cement mortar. Then, cubic specimens with dimensions 50 mm × 50 mm × 50 mm were prepared via molding for compressive strength testing, and cylindrical specimens of dimensions ∅50 mm × 100 mm were prepared for split-tensile strength testing. Additionally, specimens of dimensions 40 mm × 40 mm × 160 mm were prepared for drying shrinkage and accelerated carbonation testing, and cylindrical specimens of dimensions of ∅100 mm × 50 mm were prepared for the chloride ion penetration test.
Each specimen was demolded after 24 h and cured in water at 20 °C. The flow and compressive strength of the cement mortar mixes were measured according to the standard KS L 5105 [36], and the tensile strength was measured according to KS F 2423 [37]. The drying shrinkage of the samples was measured according to the standard KS F 2424 [38]. In the accelerated carbonation test, the carbonation depth was measured by using a phenolphthalein solution after the carbonation process in an accelerated carbonation chamber according to the standard KS F 2584 [39]. Additionally, the chloride-ion penetration test was performed according to ASTM C 1202 [40]. This test method involves monitoring the amount of electrical current passed through the samples. The total charge passed, in coulombs, has been found to be related to the resistance of the specimen to chloride ion penetration [40].

3. Experimental Results and Discussion

3.1. CCP Synthesis

CCP was synthesized using EDC and HCA with chitosan, as previously reported (Figure 2) [35,41]. First, chitosan (500 mg) was dissolved in a 5 N HCl solution (2.5 mL) and DDW (23 mL). Then, HCA (590 mg) in ethanol (2.5 mL) and EDC (625 mg) in ethanol (10 mL) were slowly added to the chitosan solution. The pH of the resultant solution was adjusted to 5.0 by using a saturated NaOH solution, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. Next, the pH of the mixture was again adjusted to 5.0 using the 5 N HCl solution. The residue was dialyzed using a membrane against a 10 mM NaCl solution for two days and DDW for 24 h, with a change of dialysate every 6 h. Finally, the solution was frozen at −20 °C in a refrigerator and lyophilized.
In addition, the absorbance of the Cat-Chit solution in DDW was analyzed by using a Genesys 180 ultraviolet–visible (UV−vis) spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Moreover, in order to conduct nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, Cat-Chit was dissolved in D2O. Then, 1H-NMR spectra were recorded using a 500 MHz NMR spectrometer (JEOL).
In order to investigate the interaction of Cat-Chit with a basic adduct from cement mortar, 40 mg of Cat-Chit reacted with a Ca(OH)2 solution (296 mg/40 mL; this corresponds to a 0.1 M concentration, which creates a similar environment to the adducts that form in cement mortar) at room temperature for 12 h, after which the solid residue was washed with water and lyophilized, yielding a brown solid. The interaction between calcium and CCP was analyzed by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy using this solid. A mid-infrared (400–4000 cm–1) range Nicolet iS5 FT-IR Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to collect spectra in the transmittance band between 400 and 4000 cm–1 at a resolution of 1 cm–1. In addition, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were recorded using an AIS1800C (SERON Technologies, Seoul, Korea).

3.2. CCP Characterization

The catechol group of the CCP was confirmed by UV–vis and 1H NMR spectroscopies (Figure 3b,c). The UV–vis spectra revealed a maximum absorption peak of 280 nm, which corresponded to the catechol conjugation; in addition, aromatic protons of catechol were represented at approximately 6.87 ppm in the 1H NMR spectra. Remarkably, the CCP was partially oxidized to quinone from catechol, as catechol is prone to oxidation. This quinone, a well-known and highly reactive species, was converted to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (dehydro-DOPA) moieties or dehydro-DOPA dimers (Figure 2) [42,43,44]. The UV–vis spectra of the synthesized CCP revealed a peak at approximately 330 nm and a broad peak at 350 nm, which corresponded to the dehydro-DOPA [44] and the dehydro-DOPA dimer [45], respectively. Additionally, although catechol showed one multiple-type peak, quinone exhibited two peaks between 6.5 and 7.0 ppm (Figure 3c, blue circle). A weak, broad peak at approximately 2.5 ppm was attributed to the methylene protons of HCA, whereas the protons of quinone appeared as two separate weak peaks (Figure 3c, red circle). Changes in the structure of the synthesized CCP were reflected by the light brown color of the product (Figure 3a), and the decrease in the solubility relative to that of Cat-Chit was observed.
In order to understand the interaction mechanism of the CCP with cement mortar, changes in the functional groups of the CCP were compared by using FT-IR before and after allowing the CCP to react with Ca(OH)2 (Figure 4). Before the reaction, the peak at approximately 3444 cm–1 corresponded to the hydroxy and amino groups in the CCP, and another peak at approximately 1633 cm–1 corresponded to carbonyl of amide (Figure 4 (black line)). In contrast, after treating CCP with Ca(OH)2, the absorption peak at approximately 3444 cm–1 was considerably attenuated because of the reaction with hydroxy and hydroxide, but significant new peaks appeared at 872 and 710 cm–1, representing the Ca–O bonds (Figure 4 (red line)). This observation strongly suggests that an interaction occurred between CCP and Ca(OH)2, such as a cross-linking or chelation process.
The SEM images in Figure 5a,b reveal the morphology of the CCP and calcium–CCP, respectively. In contrast to the transparent, smooth surface of the CCP, the calcium cations in calcium–CCP were clearly detected in the form of spherical mineral deposits, and the rest of the surface appeared strong and rigid.

3.3. Mortar Flow

Figure 6 shows the variations in the flow of mortars with various amounts of CPW. Evidently, the mortar flow of the control mix was the highest at approximately 186 mm, whereas those of the mixtures mixed with CPW were all slightly lower in the range of approximately 173–181 mm. However, these differences in the flow were not significant, implying that the incorporation of the CCP did not significantly degrade the fluidity of the cement mortar.

3.4. Compressive Strength

Figure 7 shows the changes in the compressive strengths of the mortars with various amounts of CPW after 7 and 28 days. After 7 days, the compressive strength of the control sample with no CPW was found to be approximately 39.4 MPa. By contrast, the 7-day compressive strength of the CPW7.5 sample was approximately 41.0 MPa, which was higher than that of other mixes and approximately 4% higher than that of the control sample.
This trend was more pronounced after 28 days. Specifically, while the 28-day compressive strength of the control sample was approximately 41.4 MPa, those of all the CPW samples were in the range of 44.0–49.8 MPa, indicating that they all had relatively higher compressive strengths than the control sample. In particular, the CPW7.5 sample again exhibited the highest compressive strength, viz., 49.8 MPa after 28 days, which is approximately 20.2% higher than that of the control sample.
According to previous investigations [46,47,48] and our own study of the interaction mechanism, hydroxyl or amino groups of the CCP seem to participate in cross-linking or chelation reactions under certain basic conditions, such as the presence of Ca(OH)2 solution. These processes could be promoted to make the polymer more rigid through interactions among many functional groups in a high-concentration polymer solution. Indeed, the experimental results showed that the system with calcium–CCP cross-linking or chelating complexes had a higher compressive strength than the control system with no CPW.
Figure 8a,b show SEM images of the control sample and CPW7.5, respectively, after the 28-day compressive strength test. As shown in the figure, the surface of the CPW7.5 particles appears to be denser than that of the control sample.
In addition, in the samples containing 2.5–7.5% of CPW, the compressive strength increased with increasing CPW proportion, but in the CPW10 sample, the compressive strength decreased relative to that of the CPW7.5 sample. This degradation was probably caused by self-aggregation [49], which generally occurs at higher polymer concentrations and is expected to decrease compressive strength. Therefore, mixing an appropriate amount of CCP with cement mortar was found to effectively improve the mechanical properties of the cement mortar.

3.5. Tensile Strength

Figure 9 shows the 28-day tensile strength of the mortar according to the amount of CPW. Evidently, the tensile strength of the mortar tends to increase as the CPW ratio increases. Specifically, the tensile strength of the samples containing 5% or more CPW (i.e., CPW5.0, CPW7.5, and CPW10) was approximately 3.97–4.39 MPa, which was ~2.3–11.5% higher than that of the control sample. In addition, the tensile strength of CPW10 sample was higher than that of the CPW7.5 sample, indicating that the use of more CCP effectively increased the tensile strength of mortar. Therefore, the incorporation of CCP improves both the tensile and compressive strength of the mortar. In addition, the ratio of the tensile strength (ft) to compressive strength (fc) was approximately 8.0–9.8%, which was similar regardless of the amount of CPW.

3.6. Drying Shrinkage

Figure 10 shows the change in the drying shrinkage of mortar after 56 days according to the amount of CPW. The drying shrinkages of the control sample and CPW2.5 were approximately 0.125–0.126% after 56 days, whereas those of CPW7.5 and CPW10 were also similar (~0.131–0.133%). However, the drying shrinkage of CPW5.0 was approximately 0.139%, which was ~11% higher than that of the control sample. In general, various factors affect the drying shrinkage of the mortar and concrete. In this study, the drying shrinkage of CPW5.0 was relatively large, but it is not clear whether this difference could be attributed to the presence of CCP or any other influencing factors. More detailed studies on shrinkage, including drying shrinkage and autogenous shrinkage of cement composites by the CCP proportion, are thus required.

3.7. Accelerated Carbonation Depth

Figure 11 shows the carbonation depth after 28 days of accelerated aging of the various samples. The carbonation depth of the control sample was approximately 1.36 mm, which was higher than those of all the mixes containing CCP. In the case of samples containing 0–7.5% CCP, carbonation depth decreased as the CPW proportion increased. Particularly, the carbonation depth of CPW7.5 was approximately 1.14 mm, which was about 16% lower than that of the control sample and the lowest among all the samples. Therefore, the proper incorporation of CCP effectively improves not only mechanical properties, such as the compressive and tensile strength (Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively), but also carbonation resistance. Taken together, these findings suggest that adding CPW makes the cement composites denser, which is known to increase compressive strength and decrease carbonation depth.

3.8. Chloride-Ion Penetrability

As shown in Figure 12, which illustrates the chloride-ion penetrability according to the amount of CPW, the total charge passing through the control mixture was the highest at approximately 10929 C. For the CPW2.5 sample, this value was slightly lower, and it continued to decrease with an increasing amount of CPW up to CPW7.5, which had a similar value to CPW10, (9744 and 9771 C, respectively). Therefore, the use of CCP is expected to improve the resistance of cement mortar relative to chloride-ion penetration.

4. Conclusions

This paper describes the first application of CCP to cement mortar in order to improve its mechanical properties and durability. The following conclusions can be derived from this study.
The results showed that an interaction between the synthesized polymer and Ca(OH)2 made CCP compatible with cement mortars.
The flow of samples with and without the CCP was not significantly different, implying that the incorporation of the CCP did not significantly affect the fluidity of the cement mortar.
The CPW7.5 sample exhibited the highest 7-day and 28-day compressive strength. Specifically, after 28 days, its compressive strength was 49.8 MPa, which was approximately 20.2% higher than that of the control sample. The tensile strength of the CPW5.0, CPW7.5, and CPW10 samples was approximately 3.97–4.39 MPa, which was ~2.3–11.5% higher than that of the control sample.
The carbonation depth of CPW7.5 was approximately 1.14 mm, which was about 16% lower than that of the control sample. Therefore, the proper incorporation of CCP effectively improves not only mechanical properties but also carbonation resistance.
The total charge passing through the samples decreased as the amount of CPW increased. Therefore, CCP is concluded to improve chloride ion penetration resistance of cement mortar.
Further studies are required in order to establish how the presence of CCP affects viscosity, shrinkage, and long-term mechanical strength, as well as how CCP influences the relationship between the microstructures of cement composites and their mechanical properties and durability characteristics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-J.C. and H.-M.K.; investigation, S.-J.C., S.-H.B., J.-I.L. and E.-J.B.; data Curation, J.-I.L. and E.-J.B.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-J.C. and H.-M.K.; writing—review and editing, S.-J.C. and S.-H.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2020R1A4A3079595). This research was also supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the NRF funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2019R1I1A3A01049510, NRF-2018R1D1A1B07042179).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) for the financial support of this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jang, I.; Son, D.; Ryu, Y.; Park, W.; Yi, C. Strength and healing performance of the mortar using bacterial pellet as a self-healing material. J. Rec. Const. Res. 2020, 8, 112–119. [Google Scholar]
  2. Luo, M.; Qian, C.X.; Li, R.-Y. Factors affecting crack repairing capacity of bacteria-based self-healing concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 87, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alghamri, R.; Kanellopoilos, A.; Al-Tabbaa, A. Impregnation and encapsulation of lightweight aggregates for self-healing concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 124, 910–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Souradeep, G.; Kua, H.W. Encapsulation technology and techniques in self-healing concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2016, 28, 04016165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vijay, K.; Murmu, M.; Deo, S.V. Bacteria based self-healing concrete–a review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 152, 1008–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sik, W.H.; Sun, P.B.; Won, Y.S.; Chel, C.Y. Crack self-healing performance according to absorption test of fiber-reinforced concrete. J. Korea Inst. Struct. Maint. Insp. 2019, 23, 122–129. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bezerra, U.T.; Ferreira, R.M.; Castro-Gomes, J.P. The effect of latex and chitosan biopolymer on concrete properties and performance. Key Eng. Mater. 2011, 466, 37–46. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar, R. A review on epoxy and polyester based polymer concrete and exploration of polyfurfuryl alcohol as polymer concrete. J. Polym. 2016, 2016, 7249743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Novoa, P.J.R.O.; Riveiro, M.C.S.; Ferreira, A.J.M.; Marques, A.T. Mechanical characterization of lightweight polymer mortar modified with cork granulates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2004, 64, 2197–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Choi, S.; Hong, B.; Lee, S.; Won, J. Shrinkage and corrosion resistance of amorphous metallic-fiber-reinforced cement composites. Compos. Struct. 2014, 107, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cho, B.; Park, S.; Park, J. Mechanical properties of polymer concrete made with recycled PET and recycled concrete aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22, 2281–2291. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferdous, W.; Manalo, A.; Wong, H.S.; Abousnina, R.; Ajarmeh, O.S.A.I.; Zhuge, Y.; Schubel, P. Optimal design for epoxy polymer concrete based on mechanical properties and durability aspects. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 232, 117229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Azadmanesh, H.; Hashemi, S.A.H.; Ghasemi, S.H. The effect of styrene-butadiene rubber and ethylene vinyl acetate polymers on the mechanical properties of Engineered Cementitious Composites. Compos. Commun. 2021, 24, 100656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mohesson, H.M.; Abbas, W.A. Effect of biopolymer alginate on some properties of concrete. J. Eng. 2020, 26, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shanmugavel, D.; Selvaraj, T.; Ramadoss, R.; Raneric, S. Interaction of a viscous biopolymer from cactus extract with cement paste to produce sustainable concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 257, 119585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Snoeck, D.; Moerkerke, B.; Mignon, A.; De Belie, N. In-situ crosslinking of superabsorbent polymers as external curing layer compared to internal curing to mitigate plastic shrinkage. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 262, 120819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mignon, A.; Vermeulen, J.; Snoeck, D.; Dubruel, P.; Van Vlierberghe, S.; De Belie, N. Mechanical and Self-healing properties of cementitious materials with pH-responsive semi-synthetic superabsorbent polymers. Mater. Struct. 2017, 50, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mignon, A.; Snoeck, D.; D’Halluin, K.; Balcaen, L.; Vanhaecke, F.; Dubruel, P.; Van Vlierberghe, S.; De Belie, N. Alginate biopolymers: Counteracting the impact of superabsorbent polymers on mortar strength. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 110, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, J.; Mignon, A.; Snoeck, D.; Wiktor, V.; Boon, N.; De Belie, N. Application of modified-alginate encapsulated carbonate producing bacteria in concrete: A promising strategy for crack self-healing. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ryu, J.H.; Lee, Y.; Kong, W.H.; Kim, T.G.; Park, T.G.; Lee, H. Catechol-functionalized chitosan/pluronic hydrogels for tissue adhesives and hemostatic materials. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 2653–2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, J.; Strandman, S.; Zhu, J.X.X.; Barralet, J.; Cerruti, M. Genipin-crosslinked catechol-chitosan mucoadhesive hydrogels for buccal drug delivery. Biomaterials 2015, 37, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kean, T.; Thanou, M. Biodegradation, biodistribution and toxicity of chitosan. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2010, 62, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dufes, C.; Muller, J.M.; Couet, W.; Olivier, J.C.; Uchegbu, I.F.; Schatzlein, A.G. Anticancer drug delivery with transferrin targeted polymeric chitosan vesicles. Pharm. Res. 2004, 21, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Zaharoff, D.A.; Rogers, C.J.; Hance, K.W.; Schlom, J.; Greiner, J.W. Chitosan solution enhances both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to subcutaneous vaccination. Vaccine 2007, 25, 2085–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Bajaj, G.; Van Alstine, W.G.; Yeo, Y. Zwitterionic chitosan derivative, a new biocompatible pharmaceutical excipient, prevents endotoxin-mediated cytokine release. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Li, P.; Poon, Y.F.; Li, W.; Zhu, H.Y.; Yeap, S.H.; Cao, Y.; Qi, X.; Zhou, C.; Lamrani, M.; Beuerman, R.W.; et al. A polycationic antimicrobial and biocompatible hydrogel with microbe membrane suctioning ability. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yang, S.H.; Lee, Y.S.; Lin, F.H.; Yang, J.M.; Chen, K.S. Chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol) blending hydrogel coating improves the surface characteristics of segmented polyurethane urethral catheters. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2007, 83, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rabea, E.I.; Badawy, M.E.; Stevens, C.V.; Smagghe, G.; Steurbaut, W. Chitosan as antimicrobial agent: Applications and mode of action. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4, 1457–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, K.; Ryu, J.H.; Lee, D.Y.; Lee, H. Bio-inspired catechol conjugation converts water-insoluble chitosan into a highly water-soluble, adhesive chitosan derivative for hydrogels and LbL assembly. Biomater. Sci. 2013, 1, 783–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, K.; Kim, K.; Ryu, J.H.; Lee, H. Chitosan-catechol: A polymer with long-lasting mucoadhesive properties. Biomaterials 2015, 52, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shin, M.; Park, S.-G.; Oh, B.-C.; Kim, K.; Jo, S.; Lee, M.S.; Oh, S.S.; Hong, S.-H.; Shin, E.-C.; Kim, K.-S.; et al. Complete prevention of blood loss with self-sealing haemostatic needles. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, W.; Shen, X.; Hu, Y.; Xu, K.; Ran, Q.; Yu, Y.; Dai, L.; Yuan, Z.; Huang, L.; Shen, T.; et al. Surface functionalization of titanium implants with chitosan-catechol conjugate for suppression of ROS-induced cells damage and improvement of osteogenesis. Biomaterials 2017, 114, 82–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xu, J.; Soliman, G.M.; Barralet, J.; Cerruti, M. Mollusk glue inspired mucoadhesives for biomedical applications. Langmuir 2012, 28, 14010–14017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Huang, X.; Bao, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Hu, Q. Catechol/functional chitosan/silver nanoparticle composite as a highly effective antibacterial agent with species-specific mechanisms. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ryu, J.H.; Choi, J.S.; Park, E.S.; Eom, M.R.; Jo, S.G.; Lee, M.S.; Kwon, S.K. Chitosan oral patches inspired by mussel adhesion. J. Control Release 2020, 317, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. KS L 5105. Testing Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars, Korea Industrial Standards; Korean Standards & Certification Information Center: Seoul, Korea, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  37. KS F 2423. Standards Test Method for Tensile Splitting Strength of Concrete. Korea Industrial Standards; Korean Standards & F 2423. Standards & Certification Information Center: Seoul, Korea, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  38. KS F 2424. Standard Test Method for Length Change of Mortar and Concrete, Korea Industrial Standards; Korean Standards & Certification Information Center: Seoul, Korea, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  39. KS F 2584. Standard Test Method for Accelerated Carbonation of Concrete, Korea Industrial Standards; Korean Standards & Certification Information Center: Seoul, Korea, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  40. ASTM C 1202. Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration; American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  41. Narkar, A.R.; Cannon, E.; Yildirim-Alicea, H.; Ahn, K. Catechol-functionalized chitosan: Optimized preparation method and its interaction with Mucin. Langmuir 2019, 35, 16013–16023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ahn, B.K. Perspectives on mussel-inspired wet adhesion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 10166–10171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Yang, J.; Stuart, M.A.C.; Kamperman, M. Jack of all trades: Versatile catechol crosslinking mechanisms. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 8271–8298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lee, B.P.; Dalsin, J.L.; Messersmith, P.B. Synthesis and gelation of DOPA-modified poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 2002, 3, 1038–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Burzio, L.A.; Waite, J.H. Reactivity of peptidyl-tyrosine to hydroxylation and cross-linking. Protein Sci. 2001, 10, 735–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Flores-Arriaga, J.C.; de Pozos-Guillén, A.J.; González-Ortega, O.; Escobar-García, D.M.; Masuoka-Ito, D.; del Campo-Téllez, B.I.M.; Cerda-Cristerna, B.I. Calcium sustained release, pH changes and cell viability induced by chitosan-based pastes for apexification. Odontology 2019, 107, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bonapasta, A.A. Cross-linking of poly (vinyl alcohol) chains by Ca ions in macro-defect-free cements. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, Z.; de Souza, L.R.; Litina, C.; Markaki, A.E.; Al-Tabba, A. Feasibility of using 3D printed polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) for creating self-healing vascular tunnels in cement systems. Materials 2019, 12, 3872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Hu, Y.; Du, Y.; Yang, J.; Tang, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, X. Self-aggregation and antibacterial activity of N-acylated chitosan. Polymer 2007, 48, 3098–3106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 14 06395 g001 550
Figure 1. Particle size distribution of fine aggregates used in this study.
Figure 1. Particle size distribution of fine aggregates used in this study.
Materials 14 06395 g001
Materials 14 06395 g002 550
Figure 2. Synthesis of Cat-Chit and possible cross-linking pathways of catechol.
Figure 2. Synthesis of Cat-Chit and possible cross-linking pathways of catechol.
Materials 14 06395 g002
Materials 14 06395 g003 550
Figure 3. Qualitative analysis of Cat-Chit: (a) photograph of the product; (b) UV–vis spectrum; (c) 1H-NMR.
Figure 3. Qualitative analysis of Cat-Chit: (a) photograph of the product; (b) UV–vis spectrum; (c) 1H-NMR.
Materials 14 06395 g003
Materials 14 06395 g004 550
Figure 4. FT-IR spectra of CCP (black line) and CCP upon reacting with Ca(OH)2 (red line). The expected structure of calcium–Cat-Chit was added in the spectra.
Figure 4. FT-IR spectra of CCP (black line) and CCP upon reacting with Ca(OH)2 (red line). The expected structure of calcium–Cat-Chit was added in the spectra.
Materials 14 06395 g004
Materials 14 06395 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM images showing the morphology of (a) CCP and (b) calcium–CCP.
Figure 5. SEM images showing the morphology of (a) CCP and (b) calcium–CCP.
Materials 14 06395 g005
Materials 14 06395 g006 550
Figure 6. Mortar flow of the samples.
Figure 6. Mortar flow of the samples.
Materials 14 06395 g006
Materials 14 06395 g007 550
Figure 7. Compressive strength of the samples after 7 and 28 days.
Figure 7. Compressive strength of the samples after 7 and 28 days.
Materials 14 06395 g007
Materials 14 06395 g008 550
Figure 8. SEM images of the (a) control and (b) CPW7.5 samples.
Figure 8. SEM images of the (a) control and (b) CPW7.5 samples.
Materials 14 06395 g008
Materials 14 06395 g009 550
Figure 9. Tensile strength (left axis) and ratio of the tensile strength to compressive strength (right axis) of various mixed samples.
Figure 9. Tensile strength (left axis) and ratio of the tensile strength to compressive strength (right axis) of various mixed samples.
Materials 14 06395 g009
Materials 14 06395 g010 550
Figure 10. Drying shrinkage of samples.
Figure 10. Drying shrinkage of samples.
Materials 14 06395 g010
Materials 14 06395 g011 550
Figure 11. Accelerated carbonation depth of the samples.
Figure 11. Accelerated carbonation depth of the samples.
Materials 14 06395 g011
Materials 14 06395 g012 550
Figure 12. Chloride-ion penetrability of the samples after 28 days.
Figure 12. Chloride-ion penetrability of the samples after 28 days.
Materials 14 06395 g012
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition of the cement used in this study.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the cement used in this study.
ComponentsSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOK2O
Ratio (%)17.436.503.5764.402.551.17
Table
Table 2. Samples and their mix proportions used in this study.
Table 2. Samples and their mix proportions used in this study.
MixCPW
(%)		W/C
(%)		Water
(kg/m3)		Cement
(kg/m3)		Sand
(kg/m3)
Control
CPW2.5
CPW5.0
CPW7.5
CPW10		0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10		50170340739
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, S.-J.; Bae, S.-H.; Lee, J.-I.; Bang, E.-J.; Ko, H.-M. Strength, Carbonation Resistance, and Chloride-Ion Penetrability of Cement Mortars Containing Catechol-Functionalized Chitosan Polymer. Materials 2021, 14, 6395. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216395

AMA Style

Choi S-J, Bae S-H, Lee J-I, Bang E-J, Ko H-M. Strength, Carbonation Resistance, and Chloride-Ion Penetrability of Cement Mortars Containing Catechol-Functionalized Chitosan Polymer. Materials. 2021; 14(21):6395. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216395

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choi, Se-Jin, Sung-Ho Bae, Jae-In Lee, Eun-Ji Bang, and Haye-Min Ko. 2021. "Strength, Carbonation Resistance, and Chloride-Ion Penetrability of Cement Mortars Containing Catechol-Functionalized Chitosan Polymer" Materials 14, no. 21: 6395. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216395

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop