Next Article in Journal
Grain Size Influence on the Magnetic Property Deterioration of Blanked Non-Oriented Electrical Steels
Next Article in Special Issue
Nano Minerals Applications in Pollutants Removal: A New Open Special Issue in Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of the Impact of Graphene Nanoplatelets (GnP) on the Bond Stress of High-Performance Concrete Using Pullout Testing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Improved Speciation Method Combining IC with ICPOES and Its Application to Iodide and Iodate Diffusion Behavior in Compacted Bentonite Clay

1
School of Nuclear Sciences and Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
2
Nuclear Science and Technology Development Center, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
3
Xiamen Institute of Rare Earth Materials, Haixi Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
4
Department of Nuclear Environmental Science, China Institute for Radiation Protection (CIRP), Taiyuan 030006, China
5
School of Political Science and Public Administration, Huaqiao University, Fujian 362021, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chuan-Pin Lee and Yanqin Hu are equal contributions.
Materials 2021, 14(22), 7056; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14227056
Submission received: 22 October 2021 / Revised: 11 November 2021 / Accepted: 15 November 2021 / Published: 20 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nano Minerals Applications in Pollutants Removal)

Abstract

:
An accurate and effective method combining ion chromatography (IC) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) was applied in this work to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze individual and co-existing iodide (I) and iodate (IO3) at various concentrations. More specifically, a very strong linear relationship for the peak area for the co-existing I and IO3 ions was reached, and a high resolution value between two peaks was observed, which proves the effectiveness of our combined IC-ICP-OES method at analyzing iodine species. We observed lower accessible porosity for the diffusion of both I and IO3 in samples of bentonite clay using IC-ICP-OES detection methods, where the effective diffusion coefficient varied based on the anion exclusion effect and the size of the diffusing molecules. In fact, the distribution coefficients (Kd) of both I and IO3 were close to 0, which indicates that there was no adsorption on bentonite clay. This finding can be explained by the fact that no change in speciation took place during the diffusion of I and IO3 ions in bentonite clay. Our IC-ICP-OES method can be used to estimate the diffusion coefficients of various iodine species in natural environments.

1. Introduction

The design of a deep geological repository for spent fuel or high-level radioactive waste (HLW) generally adopts a “multi-barrier system”. Generally, the underground facilities, waste containers, and buffer/backfill materials (e.g., bentonite clay) are known as engineering barriers, and the surrounding geological formations are known as natural barriers. In such a system, the engineering barriers and the geological medium serve a dual purpose: they ensure both the containment of the source term and the protection of the biosphere. In order to retard radionuclide release, the materials used in the construction of an HLW repository must have specific properties that help to prevent the dispersion of radioactivity. Such design parameters make it possible both to delay the time required for the radionuclides to reach the biosphere and to reduce their concentration by means of retarding mechanisms, including sorption, diffusion, and dispersion, so as to ensure the safety of the final disposal of radioactive waste [1,2].
Bentonite clay is just such an engineering barrier that has often been used as a buffer/backfill material because of its retention effect on the migration of radionuclides to the biosphere [2,3]. Conducting performance assessments (PA) of Wyoming bentonite clay and other such materials in order to determine their physical and chemical properties has been a key element in the design of HLW repositories in the past 20 years. Studies have used experimental methods to identify the properties of bentonite, such as low hydraulic conductivity, good swelling and plasticity, low solute diffusivity, strong retardation of radionuclide migration, and high cation exchange capacity [4,5,6,7,8].
In addition to transuranic elements (TRU), the possible environmental impact of long-lived radionuclides that exhibit a relatively high mobility under certain geochemical conditions must be taken into consideration when designing an HLW repository. In particular, weakly adsorbed radionuclide anions are the most important, for example 129I, 99Tc, and 79Se [9,10,11,12]. As one of the primary fission products, 129I is characterized by a long half-life (t1/2 = 1.57 × 107 years), a high fission yield, easy volatilization, easy migration, a high radioactive toxicity, and a high bioavailability. Furthermore, the pH of and the redox potential in aqueous solutions determines the form that iodine takes in the environment, including iodide (I), iodate (IO3), I2, and organic iodine. Thus, 129I is the main source of potential risk posed, not only by HLW repositories, but also by nuclear accidents such as the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. This threat has recently been made obvious when 129I was observed in the Pacific Ocean around Japan, where fast dispersion by the movement of the seawater and deposition caused it to migrate into the marine sediments [13].
While carrying out a safety assessment (SA) for the disposal of HLW, numerical models should be used in order to consider and evaluate a variety of scenarios, including the possibility of radionuclides being released into the environment and thus exposing people to radiation, as in the scenario in which radionuclides migrate into groundwater following the failure of the multi-barrier system after 10,000 years [14]. In fact, groundwater is the main carrier of migrating 129I, which can exist in various forms, of which I and IO3are the main anions found in groundwater [15,16]. Therefore, the diffusion behavior of I and IO3 in the bentonite clay buffer is considered a major issue for the assessment of the possibility of the release of radionuclides into the environment from an HLW repository.
Several previous studies on fission products have been performed to calculate sorption and diffusion parameters, Kd values, and diffusion coefficients under various conditions. For example, some research has recorded very low Kd values (~0) [17,18]. Another study in which through-diffusion experiments were performed with sand with bentonite clay mixtures obtained diffusion coefficients of 125I: 5.1 ± 0.8 × 10−11 m2 s−1 [19]. Moreover, it has been suggested that the migration of iodine may be affected by its own physical and chemical properties, as in the case of the anion exclusion effect [19,20]. Finally, it is also possible that oxidation-reduction reactions occurring in the environment cause changes in the chemical form of iodine, thus also impacting its migration. However, few studies have focused on iodine speciation (e.g., I and IO3), on the one hand, because of the difficulty of separating the iodine from the environmental matrix and, on the other, because of the high cost of achieving accurate detection with a combination of advanced instrumental methods such as accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (NanoSIMS), and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [13,16,21,22].
In recent years, ion chromatography (IC) has become a popular and effective method applied to the analysis of anion speciation in environmental samples [16]. Another method used for quantifying anions based on deriving analytical solutions is inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), a convenient and rapid tool with which the limit of detection can be determined. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a relatively simple, effective, and reliable method to detect I and IO3 by combining IC and ICP-OES to create IC-ICP-OES. More specifically, we investigated the variability of the concentrations of I and IO3, both as individual ions and as co-existing ions, separating and analyzing them by calibrating the IC-ICP-OES to be able to carry out both qualitative and quantitative analyses. We also performed through-diffusion experiments to examine the diffusion behavior of I and IO3 in compacted bentonite clay based on their diffusion coefficients. Our experiments with the IC-ICP-OES can serve as an important reference case while carrying out future SAs of engineering barriers used in HLW repositories in China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Characterization of Bentonite Clay

The material tested in this work was a sample of Wyoming Na-bentonite clay purchased from American Colloid Company. It had a montmorillonite content of approximately 85–90 wt.%. Previous studies have investigated its mineralogical and chemical properties using X-ray diffraction analysis techniques to identify several minor mineral components such as quartz and feldspar [23,24]. In this study, a wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence (WDXRF) spectrometer (Axios, PANalytical Inc., Amsterdam, the Netherlands) was employed to analyze samples of commercial bentonite clay from Wyoming (B) and Taiwan (Z), as well as a sample of standard montmorillonite from Inner Mongolia in China (M). The chemical compositions of these clays are given in Table 1. These results were compared for reference.

2.2. Preparation of Iodide (I) and Iodate (IO3) Standard Solution

All chemical reagents used in our experiments were of analytical grade of purity, and the Milli-Q® ultrapure water has a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ.cm (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). A standardized potassium iodide (KI) solution containing 1.20 ± 0.05 g of KI and a potassium iodate (KIO3) solution containing 1.30 ± 0.05 g of KIO3 were prepared in deionized water and 3–5% of nitric acid (HNO3). Finally, these solutions were diluted 100 times with deionized water to 1 L in a volumetric flask. The concentrations of I and IO3 in the diluted solutions were measured and analyzed by means of IC and ICP-OES (iCAP 7000, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) to the point at which the variation of element concentrations was within 5% of the corresponding liquid phase concentrations.

2.3. Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses with IC-ICP-OES to Detect I and IO3

We used an IC instrument equipped with a conductivity detector to analyze the different iodine species, and then we quantitatively measured them with ICP-OES. By deriving an analytical solution, the I and IO3 anions could be effectively detected and separated through the combination of IC and ICP-OES techniques. In addition, an ICS600 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) was equipped with a gradient pump, an injection valve with a 10 μL sample loop, and an anion-exchange column (250 mm × 4.6 mm inner diameter). Moreover, the eluent solution used in the IC procedure consisted of 1.0 mM NaHCO3 and 3.2 mM Na2CO3, with degassing performed with a DG-2410 degasser (Uniflows, Tokyo, Japan) before the injection of individual and co-existing I and IO3 ions. Finally, the resolution (R) was calculated based on the peak areas and retention times:
R = 0.5 × (M1 + M2)/(M1 − M2) × (s/a)
where M1 and M2 represent the peak areas of I and IO3, respectively; a is the peak width at 5% of the peak height (for I and IO3); and s is the time difference between the peak heights of I and IO3. The results showed that two peaks could be effectively separated and identified at R > 0.5.

2.4. Through-Diffusion Experiments (TD): Column Tests

We developed and verified a precise and reliable apparatus with sandwich-like columns to conduct through-diffusion (TD) experiments, as shown in Figure 1. A similar experimental apparatus has been employed in several past studies [12,20,25]. The MX-80 bentonite sample dimension in thickness and cross-sectional area was 3 mm and 19.6 cm2, respectively. The sample slab was inserted and fixed in a holder and was sandwiched between two glass microfiber filters (0.4 mm thickness) with pore size of 0.7 um (GF/F, Associated Design & Manufacturing Co., Alexandria, VA, USA), a Teflon O-ring, and constrainers. Figure 1 shows a schematic description of the diffusion cell for compacted bentonite in the through-diffusion experiments. The Teflon O-ring and constrainers were used to reduce cell deformation, minimize diffusion resistance, and resist swelling pressure induced by the bentonite clay following saturation with water. The previous literature reported that concentration gradient between inlet and outlet diffusion cells with filters has few differences in estimating effective diffusion coefficients of HTO, 125I and 134Cs+ [19].
The setup consisted mainly of a highly precise multichannel isocratic peristaltic pump (Masterflex L/S, Cole-Parmer Instrument Co., Barrington, IL, USA) for use with two polypropylene (PP) columns (No. 1–2, modified type, Hsinchu ZeGi Industrial Co., Ltd., Hsinchu, Taiwan), an initial tracer reservoir containing individual I (C0 = 1000 ± 50 ppm) and IO3 (C0 = 1000 ± 50 ppm) ions, and various Teflon® (PTFE) units and connectors. The PP columns were made of pressure-resistant polypropylene (<10 MPa) and had a length of 13.6 cm and an inner diameter of 5 cm. They were filled with bentonite clay having a total porosity of 0.26 and a bulk density of 2.0 g/cm3.

2.5. Estimation of Diffusion Coefficient

In this work, Fick’s second law was applied to estimate the diffusion coefficients (D) for I and IO3 in compacted bentonite clay. The one-dimensional diffusion equation for the radionuclides can be written as follows:
C t = D e α 2 C x 2 ,   ( D a = D e α , α = θ + ρ b K d )
where De and Da are the effective and apparent diffusion coefficients, respectively; α (capacity factor) is a function of the bulk density of the dry material (ρb), the total porosity of compacted samples (θ), and the distribution coefficient Kd; and C is the concentration of the solute in the liquid phase. The rate at which molecules spread determines the diffusion coefficient (D), which is the proportionality constant between the mass flux and the concentration gradient of the solute. Both boundary and initial conditions limit the through-diffusion experimental method and can be expressed as follows:
C ( x , 0 ) = 0 ,   0 < x < L
C ( 0 , t ) = C 0
C ( L , t ) ~ 0
where the tracer concentration in the reservoir containing the tracer is constant (C0); the ion concentration in the opposing reservoir is kept close to zero; and L is the overall duration of the compaction of the clay samples.
As defined by Crank [26], the cumulative mass, M, and the concentration ratio, CR(t), of I and IO3 in the measurement reservoir were calculated according to the following formula:
CR ( t ) = C ( t ) C 0 = L S V ( D e t L 2 α 6 2 π 2 n = 1 ( 1 ) n n 2 exp [ n 2 π 2 D e t L 2 ] )
where De is the effective diffusion coefficient that takes the capacity factor (α) into consideration and V and S are the diffusion volume and the cross-section area of the compacted samples, respectively. When sufficient time is allowed to carry out the TD test, the diffusion process reaches a steady state. Consequently, the exponential term in Equation (3) tends to zero, and the profile curve illustrating the distribution of the CR(t) shows a linear relationship with time (t). Moreover, using a method for statistical data analysis that had previously been developed [25], we compared our measurements for I and IO3 and evaluated them in terms of the steady-state diffusion condition and its relation to time. The combination of the IC and ICP-OES techniques makes it possible to determine whether or not the speciation of I and IO3 changes during the diffusion process. Therefore, using both techniques while concurrently performing experimental and numerical analyses of I and IO3 provides an effective and important tool for carrying out future safety assessments of HLW repositories.

2.6. Estimation of Distribution Coefficients (Kd)

We performed a simulation of batch sorption experiments with I and IO3 in bentonite clay. More specifically, the standard ASTM batch method [27] was applied to three solutions of 50 mL, each containing samples of bentonite prepared in centrifuge tubes. Thus, the adsorption of I and IO3 in the bentonite was observed by measuring the pH, Eh, and the final ion concentrations. In order to introduce stable isotope tracers, an individual I and IO3 stock solution was added to the initial bentonite solution prior to the batch testing. The I and IO3 stock solution was prepared at initial concentrations (C0) of 5, 10, and 20 ppm. All batch tests were conducted on solutions with a solid–liquid ratio of 1 g per 30 mL. The centrifuge tubes were placed in an oscillating thermostatic shaker, and the solutions were uniformly mixed at 200 rpm for 7 days. The solid and liquid phases were separated by being put in a high-speed centrifuge (RCF = 10,000 g) for 30 min. Approximately 10 mL of the supernatant was reserved to analyze the final concentrations of the I and IO3 by means of a combination of the IC and off-line ICP-OES techniques, at which time changes in pH and Eh were also recorded. As a result, the distribution coefficient (Kd) for I and IO3 can be written as follows:
K d = C 0 C C V m
where C0 is the initial ion concentration of I (or IO3); C is the final ion concentration; and V and m are the volume (mL) and mass (g) of the samples, respectively.

3. Results

3.1. Identification for Individual I and IO3

Solutions (10 μL) containing various concentrations of I and IO3 ions were injected into an IC system, with measurements simultaneously taken by a conductivity detector and ICP-OES equipment and elution performed with a solution of 1.0 mM NaHCO3 and 3.2 mM Na2CO3 (See results in Table 2). After diluting the solutions 100–500 times, distinct peaks at 20 min and 4 min on the chromatograms for the individual I and IO3, respectively, with a very clear peak for IO3, show that these ions were effectively separated and detected by IC in the range 100–500 ppm (See Figure 2). This finding also demonstrates that ICP-OES was able to identify the I and IO3 ions as forms of iodine after linear calibration had been performed. However, conductivity peaks were much less prominent at the concentration of 100 ppm, which made it very difficult to distinguish I and IO3.

3.2. Performance for Co-Existing I and IO3

IC was also used to analyze solutions with different concentrations of co-existing I and IO3 ions (Table 3 and Figure 3). The resulting chromatograms are in agreement with those shown in Figure 2 in terms of individual peak height, peak area, and retention time. Moreover, a very strong linear relationship for the peak area for the co-existing I and IO3 ions was reached (0.99), and a high resolution value (R: 52.30~79.36) between two peaks was observed, which proves that IC provided a very effective qualitative and quantitative analysis of the two forms of iodine investigated in this study.

3.3. Diffusion of I and IO3

The results of the TD experiments with our IC-ICP-OES method indicate that the time required for the I and IO3 ions to diffuse out of the bentonite clay was approximately 24 h, with the steady-state condition reached in 7 to 10 days as a result of a constant diffusion flux. The effective diffusion coefficient (De) and the capacity factor (α) for the I and IO3 ions in compacted bentonite were estimated on the basis of numerical analyses, including calculating graphical asymptotes, finding analytical solutions with Lsqcurvefit, and modeling with dual period diffusion model (DPDM) [25,28] (See Table 4 and Figure 4). Our findings indicate that the diffusion of the I and IO3 ions in bentonite clay could be suitable fitting, which can be explained by the fact that no change in speciation was detected by means of the IC-ICP-OES technique.

3.4. Batch Tests of I and IO3

The batch experiments conducted with the IC-ICP-OES method indicated that the adsorption of I and IO3 in three samples of bentonite clay reached the steady-state condition in approximately 7 days. Table 5 lists the individual values of the pH, Eh, and distribution coefficients (Kd) for the I and IO3 ions in compacted bentonite. Our findings indicate that no sorption of I and IO3 has taken place in the bentonite clay samples, which can be explained by the fact that no change in speciation was detected by means of the IC-ICP-OES technique.

4. Discussion

In this work, individual IO3 ions were consistently detected first, after which individual I was extracted by elution from the solution containing co-existing I and IO3 ions. Generally, the affinity of the anion exchange resin is quite different for I and IO3, with I being subject to a higher adsorption affinity and anion exchange and showing a slower retention time (~20 min) than IO3 (~4 min) during the elution process. In fact, it has been shown that some ions interfere with the IC-based detection of I and IO3 ions in complex and natural environments [16,29], a problem that could be solved by combining IC with such instruments as ICP-MS, AMS, or other instruments for measuring radioactivity. To this end, we have developed a more effective and accurate technique based on the combination of the IC and the ICP-OES methods to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively both individual and co-existing I and IO3 ions in solutions at various concentrations.
In this study, tritiated water (3H2O), a non-reactive radiotracer, was used to estimate the total porosity ( θ = the ratio of pore volume to total volume) of the bentonite clay. Because the total porosity is equivalent to the water content, 3H2O is commonly applied to the identification of all chemical elements that are not retained in the solid phase. We showed that the porosity accessible (αacc) to both I and IO3 ions was lower than that accessible to HTO, which was determined on the basis of the anion exclusion effect (Kd~0) [20,25] and the decreasing number of interlayer pores [10,30,31]. This result indicates that I and IO3 ions have a similar mobility as does 3H2O when the effective diffusion coefficients (De) are compared. Moreover, there were significant differences between the anions present in bentonite clay with regards to the exclusion effect, which has been associated with the size or hydrated radius of I (~2.16 Å), IO3 (~3.30 Å), and 99TcO4 (~3.50 Å) [32,33]. On the other hand, the porosity accessible (αacc) to SeO32− (IV) might be higher than that accessible to 3H2O as a result of the anion exclusion effect and the weak adsorption effect (Kd > 0) [20]. The parameters of these different anions are listed in Table 4; the I and IO3 anions were investigated in this paper and the 99TcO4 and SeO32− (IV) anions were examined in previous research [20,25].

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we developed a relatively simple, effective, and reliable method to detect individual and co-existing I and IO3 ions through a combination of ion chromatography (IC) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) techniques, which we call IC-ICP-OES. The anion exchange resin exhibited a different affinity for I and IO3, with I being subject to a higher adsorption affinity and anion exchange. This finding demonstrates that ICP-OES was able to identify the I and IO3 ions as forms of iodine after linear calibration had been performed. In fact, there was obvious interference with the performance of the conductivity detector during the IC-based I and IO3 analysis procedure, which suggested the possibility of combining IC with an offline ICP-OES detection system to obtain accurate measurements of I and IO3 chromatographic peaks at different retention times. Therefore, an analysis of the diffusion of I and IO3 ions in bentonite clay was performed, with the results showing that lower accessible porosity was related to the anion exclusion effect and the size or hydrated radius of the ions. The effective diffusion coefficient (De) and the capacity factor (α) obtained in this study could be used as input data for future safety assessments of radioactive waste disposal facilities. In conclusion, 129I anions, in the form of I and IO3, are radionuclides that are critical factors to take into account when carrying out safety assessments of deep geological repositories for HLW, which should be a focus of future R&D studies. In addition, our results confirm that Wyoming bentonite clay shows potential for use as a buffer/backfill material to counter the diffusion of radionuclides from containers used for storing HLW.
We have been relying on nuclear power for decades to meet our electricity needs. Today, governments around the word continue to invest in nuclear technology as part of their strategies to combat climate change and transition to low-carbon economies. Our role is to ensure there is a safe, long-term solution to the obstacles facing the containment and isolation of any spent nuclear fuel created by nuclear power generation, including what already exists today and any produced in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-C.T., C.-P.L., Y.H. and N.-C.T.; methodology, C.-P.L., D.C., E.W., Z.W. (Ziteng Wang) and N.-C.T.; software, Z.W. (Zijin Wen), C.-P.L. and N.-C.T.; validation, E.W., Z.W. (Ziteng Wang), Y.S., D.C., N.-C.T. and S.-C.T.; formal analysis, F.Y., Y.-L.L., Y.S., D.C., C.-P.L. and N.-C.T.; investigation, Y.H., Y.S., F.Y. and Y.-L.L.; resources, N.-C.T. and S.-C.T.; data curation, F.Y., Y.-L.L., Y.S., D.C., Y.H. and Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-P.L. and N.-C.T.; writing—review and editing, C.-P.L. and N.-C.T.; visualization, Y.H., Y.S., F.Y. and Y.-L.L.; supervision, C.-P.L. and N.-C.T.; project administration, N.-C.T. and S.-C.T.; funding acquisition, N.-C.T. and S.-C.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was mainly supported by the Doctor Initial Financial Project (No. 1410000434), China Uranium Company and East China University of Technology United Project (No. NRE2021-10), and Jiangxi Province Graduate Student Creative Project (No. YC2021-S653). This project was financed in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST, Taiwan R.O.C.) and the Atomic Energy Council (AEC, Taiwan R.O.C.) through a two-year mutual fund program project under contract numbers 109-2623 -E-007 -006 -NU and 110-2623 -E-007 -004 -NU.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The experimentation conducted in this study was assisted by Tsuey-Lin Tsai, Yu-Hung Shih, and Liang-Cheng Chen, members of the Chemistry and Analysis Division of the Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Taiwan. Assistance in conducting the experimental and instrumental analyses of this study was provided by the Department of Nuclear Environmental Science of the China Institute for Radiation Protection (CIRP) in Taiyuan, China, the Instrumentation Center at the National Tsing Hua University in Taiwan, and the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC) in Taiwan, under the contract number 2020-1-123-5.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Taiwan Power Company. Preliminary Technical Feasibility Study for Final Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel—2009; Progress Report (Summary); Taiwan Power Company: Taipei, Taiwan, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute. Japan, H12: Project to Establish the Scientific and Technical Basis for HLW Disposal in Japan; Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute: Tokyo, Japan, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yang, T.; Knutsson, S.; Liu, X. Swelling properties and permeability of expandable clays of potential use for nuclear waste disposal. J. Earth Sci. Geotech. Eng. 2016, 6, 9–61. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cui, Y.J. On the hydro-mechanical behaviour of MX80 bentonite-based materials. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2017, 9, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, Y.G.; Dong, X.X.; Zhang, X.D.; Ye, W.M.; Cui, Y.J. Cyclic thermal and saline effects on the swelling pressure of densely compacted Gaomiaozi bentonite. Eng. Geol. 2019, 255, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, Y.; Cai, Y.Q.; Pan, K.; Ye, W.M.; Wang, Q. Influence of dry density and water salinity on the swelling pressure and hydraulic conductivity of compacted GMZ01 bentonite–sand mixtures. Acta Geotech. 2021, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jan, Y.L.; Tsai, S.C.; Wei, Y.Y.; Tung, N.C.; Wei, C.C.; Hsu, C.N. Coupled mechanics, hydraulics and sorption properties of mixtures to evaluate buffer/backfill materials. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2007, 32, 789–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jan, Y.L.; Tsai, S.C.; Hsu, C.N. Associating characterization of bentonite-based buffer/backfill materials by distribution ratio (Rd) and Plastic index (PI). J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 2007, 15, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Glaus, M.A.; Müller, W.; Van Loon, L.R. Diffusion of iodide and iodate through Opalinus Clay: Monitoring of the redox state using an anion chromatographic technique. Appl. Geochem. 2008, 23, 3612–3619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Van Loon, L.R.; Soler, J.M.; Jakob, A.; Bradbury, M.H. Effect of confining pressure on the diffusion of HTO, 36Cl and 125I in a layered argillaceous rock (Opalinus Clay): Diffusion perpendicular to bedding. Appl. Geochem. 2003, 18, 1653–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shi, Y.; Lee, C.P.; Yu, H.; Hu, Y.; Liu, H.; Tien, N.C.; Wang, Y.; Liu, W.; Kong, J. Study on Advection-Dispersion Behavior for Simulation of HTO and Se Transport in crushed granite. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2021, 328, 1329–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shih, Y.H.; Lee, I.H.; Ni, C.F.; Tsai, T.L.; Chen, L.C.; Lee, C.P.; Tsai, S.C.; Su, T.Y. Experimental and numerical investigations of 99TcO42− diffusion in compacted SPV 200 bentonite. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2018, 316, 1081–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fan, Y.; Hou, X.; Fukuda, M.; Zheng, J.; Aono, T.; Chen, N.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, W. 129I in a sediment core offshore Fukushima: Distribution, source and its implication. Chemosphere 2020, 252, 126524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, H.H.; Zhao, S.W.; Jia, M.L. The study of safety assessment guide of HLW geologic disposal system. J. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 2016, 36, 313–322. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, S.; Xu, C.; Creely, D.; Ho, Y.F.; Li, H.P.; Grandbois, R.; Schwehr, K.A.; Kaplan, D.I.; Yeager, C.M.; Wellman, D. Iodine-129 and Iodine-127 speciation in groundwater at the Hanford Site, U.S: Iodate Incorporation into Calcite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 9635–9642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kimmig, S.R.; Thompson, C.; Baum, S.; Brown, C.F. Evaluation of iodine speciation and 129I/127I ratios at low concentrations in environmental samples using IC-ICP-MS. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2021, 327, 929–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bors, J.; Dultz, S.; Riebe, B. Organophilic bentonites as adsorbents for radionuclides: I. Adsorption of ionic fission products. Appl. Clay Sci. 2000, 16, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Riebe, B.; Bors, J.; Dultz, S. Retardation capacity of organophilic bentonite for anionic fission products. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2001, 47, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yamaguchi, T.; Nakayama, S.; Nagao, S.; Kizaki, M. Diffusive transport of neptunium and plutonium through compacted sand-bentonite mixtures under anaerobic conditions. Radiochim. Acta 2007, 95, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kong, J.; Lee, C.P.; Sun, Y.; Hua, R.; Liu, W.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y. Anion exclusion and sorption effect for compacted bentonite: The dependency of diffusion coefficients and capacity of HTO and Se (IV). J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2021, 328, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lebeau, D.; Leroy, N.; Doizi, D.; Wu, T.D.; Guerquin-Kern, J.L.; Perrin, L.; Ortega, R.; Voiseux, C.; Fournier, J.B.; Potin, P.; et al. Mass spectrometry-based imaging techniques for iodine-127 and iodine-129 detection and localization in the brown alga Laminaria digitata. J. Environ. Radioact. 2021, 231, 106552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, M.; Hou, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Chen, N.; Fang, M. Rapid Analysis of 129 I in Natural Water Samples Using Accelerator Mass Spectrometry. At. Spectrosc. 2021, 42, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Molera, M.; Eriksen, T. Diffusion of 22Na+, 85Sr2+, 134Cs+ and 57Co2+ in bentonite clay compacted to different densities: Experiments and modeling. Radiochim. Acta 2002, 90, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, T.H.; Payne, T.E.; Harrison, J.J.; Teng, S.P. Interactions involving strontium and various organic acids on the surface of bentonite (MX-80). J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2015, 304, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lee, C.P.; Hu, Y.; Chen, D.; Tien, N.C.; Tsai, S.C.; Shi, Y.; Lee, I.H.; Ni, C.F. A statistical evaluation for comparable analysis for estimating diffusion coefficient of pertechnetate (99TcO4) in compacted bentonite. Minerals 2021, 11, 1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Crank, J. The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd ed.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  27. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Distribution Coefficients of Inorganic Species by the Batch Method. Am. Soc. Test. Mater. 2010, C1733-10, C26, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee, C.H.; Teng, S.P. A dual period diffusion model for measuring diffusion parameters. Waste Manag. 1993, 13, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Takeda, A.; Tsukada, H.; Takaku, Y.; Satta, N.; Baba, M.; Shinata, T.; Hasegawa, H.; Unno, Y.; Hisamatsu, S. Determination of iodide, iodate and total iodine in natural water samples by HPLC with amperometric and spectrophotometric detection, and off-line UV irradiation. Anal. Sci. 2016, 32, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Van Loon, L.R.; Soler, J.M.; Bradbury, M.H. Diffusion of HTO, 36Cl and 125I in Opalinus Clay samples from Mont Terri: Effect of confining pressure. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2003, 61, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wigger, C.; Van Loon, L.R. Importance of Interlayer Equivalent Pores for Anion Diffusion in Clay-Rich Sedimentary Rocks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 57, 1998–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Nightingale, E.R., Jr. Phenomenological theory of ion solvation. Effective radii of hydrated ions. J. Phys. Chem. 1959, 63, 1381–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yu, J.W.; Neretnieks, I. Diffusion and Sorption Properties of Radionuclides in Compacted Bentonite; SKB TR 97-12; Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB: Stockholm, Sweden, 1997. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The TD apparatus with a sandwich-like column.
Figure 1. The TD apparatus with a sandwich-like column.
Materials 14 07056 g001
Figure 2. The chromatographic peaks for individual I and IO3 at different concentrations. (a) I; (b) IO3; (c) the linear relationship between peak area and concentration of I and IO3.
Figure 2. The chromatographic peaks for individual I and IO3 at different concentrations. (a) I; (b) IO3; (c) the linear relationship between peak area and concentration of I and IO3.
Materials 14 07056 g002
Figure 3. The chromatographical peak for co-existing I and IO3 at different concentration. (a) I (green line) and IO3 (red line) same in Figure 2; (b) the linear relationship between peak area and concentration of co-existing I and IO3.
Figure 3. The chromatographical peak for co-existing I and IO3 at different concentration. (a) I (green line) and IO3 (red line) same in Figure 2; (b) the linear relationship between peak area and concentration of co-existing I and IO3.
Materials 14 07056 g003
Figure 4. The diffusion curves of I and IO3 in bentonite clay. (a) I and IO3; (b) other radionuclides.
Figure 4. The diffusion curves of I and IO3 in bentonite clay. (a) I and IO3; (b) other radionuclides.
Materials 14 07056 g004
Table 1. The chemical properties of commercial bentonite clay from three sources.
Table 1. The chemical properties of commercial bentonite clay from three sources.
Element (%)WyomingTaiwanInner Mongolia
SiO253.7850.8763.71
Al2O317.5915.5413.44
Fe2O33.245.932.01
CaO1.292.830.90
Na2O1.921.211.67
K2O0.471.410.67
MnO0.010.100.04
MgO2.042.112.67
TiO20.140.380.12
P2O50.050.070.03
* LOI16.7712.7212.91
* LOI: Loss On Ignition.
Table 2. The characteristics of the individual I and IO3 in different concentration.
Table 2. The characteristics of the individual I and IO3 in different concentration.
Iodine SpeciationNo.C (ppm)Area (uS/cm·s)
I
(Retention time:~20 min)
1140372.2
2220602.5
33601060.1
45501677.1
* R20.99
IO3
(Retention time:~4 min)
5170261.7
6260503.0
7430859.0
86501372.0
* R20.99
* R2: R-squares.
Table 3. The characteristics of the co-existing I and IO3 at different concentration.
Table 3. The characteristics of the co-existing I and IO3 at different concentration.
ItemI
(ppm)
Area
(uS/cm·s)
IO3
(ppm)
Area
(uS/cm·s)
* R
No.
1104192.6067166.1479.36
2137266.94102273.7668.67
3212436.76173518.4852.30
4382921.08267781.0671.17
57421631.975541667.8569.19
** R 20.990.99-
* R (resolution value); ** R 2 (linear regression coefficient).
Table 4. The diffusion characteristics of different radionuclides in compacted Wyoming bentonite.
Table 4. The diffusion characteristics of different radionuclides in compacted Wyoming bentonite.
RNρb (g/cm3)De (m2/s)αaccReference
I2.03.28 × 10−110.20In this work
In this work
IO32.02.43 × 10−110.25
99TcO42.04.38 × 10−130.06Lee, C.P. et al. 2021 [25]
Lee, C.P. et al. 2021 [25]
Lee, C.P. et al. 2021 [25]
Lee, C.P. et al. 2021 [25]
1.28.89 × 10−120.39
HTO2.02.16 × 10−110.29
1.26.25 × 10−110.56
SeO32− (IV)1.21.50 × 10−113.52Kong, J. et al. 2021 [20]
Table 5. The pH, Eh, and distribution coefficients (Kd) for I and IO3 in three samples of bentonite clay.
Table 5. The pH, Eh, and distribution coefficients (Kd) for I and IO3 in three samples of bentonite clay.
RNC0
(ppm)
WyomingTaiwanInner Mongolia
pHEh (mV)Kd (mL/g)pHEh (mV)Kd (mL/g)pHEh (mV)Kd (mL/g)
I59.46 ± 0.13251 ± 60.01 ± 0.007.23 ± 0.08170 ± 1~09.22 ± 0.03221 ± 30.01 ± 0.00
109.55 ± 0.07116 ± 5~07.94 ± 0.45282 ± 70.03 ± 0.009.05 ± 0.27186 ± 15~0
209.57 ± 0.06241 ± 2~08.53 ± 0.04306 ± 4~09.11 ± 0.16211 ± 8~0
IO359.53 ± 0.04243 ± 9~08.24 ± 0.01321 ± 90.02 ± 0.009.13 ± 0.14273 ± 80.01 ± 0.00
109.26 ± 0.33243 ± 80.01 ± 0.008.05 ± 0.02247 ± 170.01 ± 0.009.36 ± 0.03233 ± 120.01 ± 0.00
209.38 ± 0.02187 ± 9~08.07 ± 0.11225 ± 3~09.28 ± 0.22197 ± 4~0
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, C.-P.; Hu, Y.; Chen, D.; Wu, E.; Wang, Z.; Wen, Z.; Tien, N.-C.; Yang, F.; Tsai, S.-C.; Shi, Y.; et al. An Improved Speciation Method Combining IC with ICPOES and Its Application to Iodide and Iodate Diffusion Behavior in Compacted Bentonite Clay. Materials 2021, 14, 7056. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14227056

AMA Style

Lee C-P, Hu Y, Chen D, Wu E, Wang Z, Wen Z, Tien N-C, Yang F, Tsai S-C, Shi Y, et al. An Improved Speciation Method Combining IC with ICPOES and Its Application to Iodide and Iodate Diffusion Behavior in Compacted Bentonite Clay. Materials. 2021; 14(22):7056. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14227056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Chuan-Pin, Yanqin Hu, Dongyang Chen, Enhui Wu, Ziteng Wang, Zijin Wen, Neng-Chuan Tien, Fan Yang, Shih-Chin Tsai, Yunfeng Shi, and et al. 2021. "An Improved Speciation Method Combining IC with ICPOES and Its Application to Iodide and Iodate Diffusion Behavior in Compacted Bentonite Clay" Materials 14, no. 22: 7056. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14227056

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop