Next Article in Journal
In-Plane Strain Measurement in Composite Structures with Fiber Bragg Grating Written in Side-Hole Elliptical Core Optical Fiber
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Investigation on Guided Waves Dispersion and Scattering Phenomena in Stiffened Panels
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cellulose and Its Nano-Derivatives as a Water-Repellent and Fire-Resistant Surface: A Review

by
Mehrnoosh Tavakoli
1,2,
Ali Ghasemian
1,
Mohammad Reza Dehghani-Firouzabadi
1 and
Bartłomiej Mazela
2,*
1
Department of Pulp and Paper Technology, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, Gorgan 4913815739, Iran
2
Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(1), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010082
Submission received: 5 November 2021 / Revised: 16 December 2021 / Accepted: 20 December 2021 / Published: 23 December 2021

Abstract

:
The inevitable destructive effects of moisture and temperature are obvious in cellulosic and nanocellulosic substrates. These materials are the main foundations of interdependent industries that produce products such as currency notes or high-quality packaging for sanitary, cosmetics, or ammunition in the defense industry. Therefore, it is essential to develop procedures to eliminate problems arising from humidity and fire to improve the quality of these green and sustainable materials. The production of waterproof and flame-resistant cellulose-based substrates has drawn increasing attention to resolve these drawbacks. In this review paper, we have initially summarized the most accessible cellulosic substrates, different kinds of nanocellulose, and the general information about water repellents and intumescent fireproof surfaces. Then, the potential and necessity of using cellulosic biobased substrates are addressed for use in modified shapes as waterproof and fire inhibitor coatings. Cost-effective, eco-friendly, and durable, dual-function coatings are also introduced as future challenges, which are exploited as water-repellents and flame-retardant cellulose-based surfaces for pulp and paper applications.

1. Introduction

Lignocellulosic biomass is often investigated as a biodegradable and renewable substitute for petroleum products because environmental problems such as pollution, global warming, and fuel resource tensions have arisen from the development of various industries [1,2].
Cellulose is the most plentiful polysaccharide and the basic substance in the cell walls of plants. It is derived from lignocellulosic biomass and is the main origin of organic compounds in nature [3]. This linear homopolymer which is composed of β-D glucopyranose (1–4 linkage) units with three free hydroxyl groups (C2, C3, C6), has great potential to be applied in various industries [4,5]. These -OH groups, as active agents and appropriate sites for chemical modifications, can be substituted with other groups such as amines, carboxyls, aldehydes, and phosphorus, to give cellulose outstanding properties. Many studies have elaborated on different cellulose sources and their various properties. There is a lengthy history of its use in both native and modified forms to achieve desired and particular properties [1,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. For example, starch, chitosan, and particularly cellulose as bio-based materials are often used in flame-retardant products [3]. The density of cellulose and the elasticity of its crystalline sites can be reached up to 1.6 g cm−3 and 100–200 GPa, respectively. Furthermore, cellulose can be used to create arranged configurations through self-assembly, originating from its semi-crystalline nature [13]. Various forms of cellulose such as cellulose derivatives, regenerated cellulose, microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), and other modified forms of cellulose have been investigated by researchers both in academic laboratories and industrial settings [14,15].
The purpose of this review study is to summarize the widely used nanoscale materials totally derived from cellulose bio-polysaccharides, with an emphasis on their use as raw materials in the wood and paper industry. Moreover, as the waterproof and fireproof concepts of modified cellulosic and nanocellulosic substrates have only recently been noticed by researchers in the wood and paper industry, the necessity of using the abovementioned surfaces is investigated as coatings. Finally, the future challenge in this field, obtaining binary coatings on cellulosic substances, is mentioned.

2. Water Resistance and Fire Resistance Implications

Before addressing the main issue, it is necessary to comprehensively address water resistance and fire resistance concepts.
Following surface chemistry development, hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces have presented potential applications such as anti-cohesion, self-cleaning, liquid separation, and printing and re-printing, which are fascinating from both academic and industrial viewpoints [16,17,18,19]. Before considering the abovementioned surfaces in detail, the wetting behavior is explained by three different modules as follows [20,21,22,23]:
Young s   equation :   cos   θ = γ s v γ s l γ l v
Wenzel s   equation :   r ( γ s v γ s l ) = γ l v   cos   θ * w  
Cassie and Baxter’s equation: cos θ = f1 cos θ1+ f2 cos θ2
where γ Sv, γ Sl, and γ lv are the surface tension between solid-vapor, solid–liquid and liquid–vapor phases, respectively; θ and θ*w are the contact angles exposed to a smooth and rough surface, respectively; r is defined as the roughness factor; f1, f2, θ1, and θ2 are, respectively, the surface area fraction and contact angle for substrates 1 and 2, which are valid for a non-homogeneous surface.
The water contact angle (WCA), which is measured for liquid droplets, is the key to distinguishing hydrophobic surfaces from superhydrophobic ones. The sliding angle (SA), as another important parameter, is mostly used in conjunction with WCA for waterproof surfaces. More precisely, the higher WCA, the lower SA, and consequently, the better the water repellency. Sustainable and bio-inspired materials can be applied as hydrophobic and superhydrophobic agents, which provide sufficient durability versus liquid droplets. As shown in Figure 1, a hydrophobic surface presents a water contact angle of more than 90°, whereas a WCA of more than 150° represents a superhydrophobic surface [16,17,18,19].
The fully bio-inspired waterproof surfaces, which originate from biopolymers such as cellulose, starch, and proteins, have been demonstrated remarkable merits in terms of environmental concerns, biodegradability, sustainability, and reusability particularly than traditional synthetic polymers such as polylactic acid (PLA), polybutylene succinate (PBS), and polyethylene furanoate (PEF) for paper and packaging objectives. However, native forms of cellulosic derivatives, owing to their high water absorbability, require modification through coating or an impregnation process, surface treatments, plasticizing, etc. for water-resistant applications [2,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,12,17,18,19].
Moreover, as observed in Figure 2, the determinant role of flame retardants is defined via the improvement of the self-stability of the polymer combustion cycle, which prevents ignition propagation either physically (cooling down, fuel dilution, protective layer formation) or chemically (gas phase, condensed phase). The flame extinguishing and ignition reduction are accomplished by the following procedures:
  • Modifying the pyrolysis process, decreasing flammable volatiles, or increasing the formation of low-flammability gases, which act as a barrier layer between the polymer and sublayers.
  • Isolating the flame and heat from oxygen in the air.
  • Applying flame retardants or dilution agents.
  • Declining the heat regression to the polymer, which hinders re-ignition by forming a protective barrier such as a char layer or intumescent coating when the polymers are subjected to heat sources.
Flame retardants are divided into two subcategories based on their operation mechanism, as follows:
Reactive: ignition inhibitors that are used during polymer synthesis (as monomers) or post-reaction processes.
Additives: combustion retardants, which are commonly applied during the polymer deformation process [3,23,24,25,26,27].
There are four common tests for evaluating combustion inhibitors:
Limiting oxygen index (LOI)
The minimum content of oxygen in the air is measured by LOI. An LOI of less than 21% represents spontaneous ignition without further heating. The greater the limiting oxygen index, the better the flame-retardant properties.
Vertical flammability (UL 94)
UL94 is a conventional method for fire propagation rate evaluation. The output data include the ignition duration, as well as flame spreading. Rates amongst V-0 to V-2 indicate combustion propagation. V-0 indicates that polymers are easily ignited and extinguished. V-1 and V-2 correspond to more time for flame spreading. No rate indicates no ignition.
Cone calorimeter
Since the combustion process consumes oxygen, the oxygen concentration is recorded continuously during the test. The peak heat release rate is considered to be the major parameter for the assessment of fire hazards.
Pyrolysis-combustion flow calorimeter (PCFC)
Data derived from this test include the total heat release, intensity, and temperature obtained from the peak heat release rate [3,10,24,26,27,28,29,30].
Some apparatuses that are commonly used for flame retardancy tests are shown graphically in Figure 3.
Recently, biobased fire inhibitors have grown exponentially due to the environmental limitations derived from plastic waste management. Even though engineering plastics such as polylactic acid (PLA), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), poly trimethylene terephthalate (PTT), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) have been commonly known as intrinsic fire retardant substances due to their self-extinguishing behavior, and appropriate dimensional and mechanical stability [3,23,24,25,26,27]. In this regard, four known biobased classifications, including carbohydrates, phenolic compounds, proteins, and lipids, have been introduced, which can be used in the naive or derivative form via biological or chemical modifications. Furthermore, functional groups for chemical modifications, suitable thermal stability, inherent fire resistance elements such as nitrogen, silicon, and phosphorus, polymer processing compatibility, and the ability to form the char barrier layer has been propounded as an efficiency indicator of biomolecules [3,10,24,26,27,28,29,30].

3. Prevalent Applicable Nanocellulosic Substances in the Wood and Paper Fields

Nanoscience refers to nanoscale materials (10−9 m), which exhibit at least one dimension with a size in the range of 1–100 nanometers. The Technical Association of Pulp and Paper Industries (TAPPI WI 3021) has proposed standard terms for nanocellulosic substances that are totally derived from nanocellulose. Nanocellulosic materials have been derived from lignocellulosic biomass and are classified into three major subcategories.
  • Cellulose nanofibrils, introduced as CNF or NFC (nanofibrillated cellulose).
  • Cellulose nanocrystals, known as CNC or NCC (nanocrystalline cellulose).
  • Bacterial cellulose, displayed as BC or BNC (bacterial nanocellulose).
The abovementioned classification is mainly derived from their preparation procedure, function, dimensions, configuration, and cellulose origin [4,6,7,14,15].
Cellulose nanofibrils display long nanoscale structures due to interlaced and flexible nanofibrils, which usually have widths in the range of 4–20 nm and a length between 50–2000 nm. For the production of CNFs, which consist of crystalline and amorphous subregions, various mechanical and chemical techniques are applied in the presence or absence of pretreatment or posttreatment processes to convey the desired characteristics. The advantages of CNFs include appropriate processability, large specific surface, recyclability, biodegradability, low density, and eco-friendliness. They also have disadvantages such as high energy consumption during production, low drainage for papermaking, and poor compatibility with hydrophobic polymers, which arises from the hydrophilic nature of CNFs [14,15,31,32,33,34]. Due to the use of various modifications such as enzymatic pretreatment, acidic hydrolysis, carboxymethylation, and TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical) oxidation, the energy expenditures have been significantly reduced [1,4,7,8,15,31,32,33,34].
Lourenço et al. [8] considered the usage of CNFs using TEMPO oxidation and carboxymethylation individually as reinforcement fillers that promote the mechanical and optical features for printing and writing paper. Cheng et al. [10] investigated the fire retardancy of an aerogel containing CNFs and zinc borate through TEMPO oxidation. The addition of zinc borate to the admixture reduced the heat release rate and improved the thermal insulation. Yook et al. [7] reported that different kinds of CNFs modified using alkyl ketene dimer (AKD) and organosilanes have great potential to be applied as barrier coatings for packaging. A 10 g/m2 coating weight was the proper option that displayed great strength against water, air, and grease. Arbatan et al. [35] fabricated superhydrophobic paper that consisted of CNF/precipitated carbonate calcium (PCC) as a filler and AKD as a sizing agent and coated these layers on filter papers via dip-coating.
Cellulose nanocrystals produced by acidic hydrolysis exhibit lengths of 100–500 nm and diameters of 5–50 nm. The extraction process and cellulose origin strongly affect the CNC dimensions. Due to their higher crystallinity, CNCs are less flexible than CNFs [33,36,37]. There are problems related to using the CNCs in the papermaking industry despite their nano-dimensions. Accordingly, surface coatings have been proposed [14,38].
It was reported that due to water permeation amongst nanocrystals, CNC films are more prone to swelling than CNF films [14]. Some authors have proposed the use of film composites containing starch, a natural biopolymer, incorporated within CNCs. This composite was introduced as a promising alternative that could be utilized for eco-friendly, biodegradable, and cost-effective packaging [39,40,41]. Campano et al. [42] concluded that using CNC without pretreatment (only hydrolyzed), the process efficiency was increased twofold without aggravating the thermal characteristics, CNC dimension, or crystallinity. Peng et al. [43] highlighted that various drying procedures of CNCs and CNFs directly affected the thermal behavior and crystallinity of these nanomaterials. In this regard, a superior combination was ascribed to CNFs in terms of their thermal behavior and crystallinity using the spray-drying method.
Bacterial cellulose originates from the use of various kinds of bacteria through fermentation, which is affected by the culture medium containing sugar. The diameter of BC is in the range of 20–100 nm. Different types of enzymes have a decisive role as intermediates during BC manufacturing. Carbon and nitrogen have been introduced as two main feedstock in the culture medium for growing bacteria. In addition, BC is identified as one of the sources suitable for CNC fabrication. Some of the bacteria used for BC production include Acetobacter xylinum [44], Gluconacetobacter xylinus [45], Komagataeibacter, and Zoogloea [37,44,45,46].
It has been demonstrated that bacterial nanocellulose is non-toxic, especially when compared to CNF and CNC, which have some concerns surrounding their toxicity [47]. George et al. [44] declared that the thermal stability and mechanical properties were much greater for CNC derived from BC (Acetobacter xylinum) compared with CNC derived from acidic hydrolysis. Some researchers reported that BC remarkably reinforced the strength of paper-based substrates [37,48,49].
The production stages of the cellulose chains, CNF, CNC from wood, lignocellulosic biomass, and BC from bacterial cellulose, are illustrated in Figure 4.
Some of the most widely used methods of nanocellulose fabrication are summarized in Table 1.

4. Cellulose and Nanocellulose Substrates as Coating Layers

Sustainable and green cellulosic-based substances have become an indispensable part of daily life due to their widespread and distinguished roles in packaging, storage, and information transmission; however, due to the hydrophilic nature of cellulose, its structure can be easily destroyed by moisture and temperature. Therefore, bio-based, innovative, and green compounds have been appointed to improve the resistance against water droplets and fire, which are placed on cellulosic surfaces via different types of coating processes [70,71].
Paper and paperboards have been recognized as the most widely used substrates after plastics for packaging purposes. Cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, consumable goods, domestic appliances, and industrial and strategic commodities such as petrochemicals are relevant to the packaging industry. Paper-based products have raised attention due to their cost-effectiveness, accessibility, light-weight nature, proper mechanical features, and printing easiness for printing and packaging applications. Generally, grammage is determined as the basic factor that distinguishes paper from paperboard. According to this classification, papers present a basic weight of 7–150 g/m2, while a basic weight of more than 150 g/m2 is attributed to paperboard [72,73]. Pigments, binders, and fillers are introduced as the three principal components of coating layers on the surface of cellulose-based materials to endow them with barrier properties for various applications. Biopolymers such as polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids can be applied as the coating layer on paper and paperboard surfaces [58,72,73].
Different methods for the coating process are addressed as follows:
Extrusion, size-press, rod or bar, dip, and curtain coating.
Extrusion advantages include non-stop processing, the formation of a homogeneous coating layer, less cracking, and fewer fine pores for inorganic coatings, and solvent-free methods. Nevertheless, it suffers from large coating weight and polymer instability [73,74,75,76].
Extrusion is the only solvent-free coating procedure, and size-press, rod or bar, dip, and curtain coating are solvent-based coating methods on cellulosic surfaces. Size press is mostly applied for imposing liquid coatings onto solid substrates such as paper (less than 10% solid coat layer) on industrial scales. The limited solid content may lead to an insufficient surface coating. In contrast, a laboratory-scale rod coater can prepare coating layers with a uniform thickness. Dip coating, as a facile and rapid coating method, requires the precise control of the coat layer thickness and is used for liquid coating slurries on cellulosic underlayers. Recently, curtain coating has gained more attention in the industry due to the formation of a homogeneous coating layer that covers the surface entirely and provides a barrier against water vapor and gas [73,74,75,76,77].
Nanocellulose films have attractive properties such as biodegradability, renewability, high mechanical strength, and bio-based sources and have been applied as promising alternatives to fossil-based and synthetic polymers for cellulosic surface coatings [73,78]. Nanoscale materials can be used as barrier film reinforcements and as a component of paper-based coating formulas. Some authors have declared that nanocellulose coatings can provide a barrier that is resistant to water droplets, different gases such as carbon dioxide and oxygen, volatile components, and grease for food packaging [74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81].

5. The Necessity of Using Waterproof Surfaces for Cellulose-Based Substances

Cellulose-based substrates retain the hydrophilic nature of cellulose, exhibit a high permeability to gases, moisture, and grease than plastics. Therefore, to overcome these shortcomings, coatings or impregnation procedures have been used. Moreover, despite the high energy consumption and production costs, incorporation of nanocellulose derivatives to polymer matrix due to high resistance properties and transparency could be compensated the poor barrier effect of cellulose against moisture. Films containing nanofibrilated cellulose due to the fiber matrix stiffness exhibit more minor water uptake and prominent barrier features than cellulose microfibrillated films. In addition, CNC films, because of their more crystalline nature than CNF, form a great barrier layer against liquid droplets [6,7,14,15,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,67].
Low surface energy and surface roughness are two key factors to obtain a water-repellent surface [19,70,82,83]. Hydrophobicity is achieved by modifying the surface chemistry and wettability transition (liquid–solid interaction) on a cellulosic surface. In addition, water repellency can be obtained via surface modification by micro- and nanoparticles. Generally, a hydrophobic surface demonstrates low surface energy. Fluoro compounds are often applied for surface energy reduction, but their utilization is limited because they are not eco-friendly.
Adhesion and liquid penetration are decreased on waterproof surfaces, which leads to easy sliding of liquid droplets on solid surfaces. Self-cleaning capability is known as the most important function of water-repellent surfaces. Thus, liquid-dust adhesion is greater than liquid-solid surface adhesion, and most dust particles are eliminated by liquid droplets. The anti-fouling properties of water-resistant substrates are derived from their resistance to water and microorganism growth. Waterproof surfaces, due to their anti-adhesion and self-cleaning features, have great potential to be utilized for the preservation of ancient books and documents, as a coating layer in high-quality packaging, and pharmaceutical devices that are prone to infection, bacteria, and contaminated surfaces. Water-resistant papers have been investigated for security applications, especially currency notes, which are exposed to dust, microorganisms, and hand sweat, to increase the durability of banknotes against water and moisture [16,17,18,19,82,83]. Latthe et al. [84] investigated the use of hydrophobic silica nanoparticles via spray coating for various surfaces such as wood, building walls, fabrics, and banknotes. They obtained a WCA of 160° and a SA of 10°. The self-cleaning potential of the superhydrophobic surface was considerable. Ogihara et al. [85] prepared transparent and superhydrophobic paper through facile spray coating of nano-silica particles tailored with different kinds of alcohols. They obtained silica nano-components containing ethanol, in which the short hydrocarbon chain of ethanol demonstrated prominent water repellency. In another study, the same authors [18] demonstrated that paper coated with modified silica nanoparticles/alumina trihydrate/titanium dioxide followed by silane coupling agents exhibited significant waterproofing effects. Accordingly, papers deposited with modified nano-silica particles have great potential applications as water-repellent banknotes. Gao et al. [86] evaluated the waterproof properties of composite using two different silica nanoparticles with different diameters (7 and 14 nm), which were dispersed in polydimethylsiloxane. They observed a linear relationship between the concentration and water contact angle. Wang et al. [16] coated a cellulosic surface with nano-silica particles via a sol-gel process, followed by impregnation in hexadecyltrimethoxysilane solution to obtain non-toxic, cost-effective, and superhydrophobic paper (WCA > 150°).

6. The Necessity of Using Fireproof Surfaces for Cellulose-Based Substances

Paper and paper products, as the main feedstocks of lignocellulosic biomass, are prone to ignition when near flames and produce ash as the residual material. Thereupon, the development of fire resistance or flame retardancy is indispensable for their applications in various industries. Flame-retardant cellulosic substrates have fascinating potential applications in air transport, electronics, securities, and ammunition packaging in the military industry.
Fire inhibitors have different chemical structures, operation modes, and consumption levels. Halogenated flame retardants, which are operated through combustion prevention in the gas phase, were used for many years. Although they were highly efficient at low concentrations, their utilization has been limited due to smoke and toxic gas production in the last decade. Phosphorus-containing flame retardants operate as flame inhibitors through char layer formation, which reduces the fuel content and accumulates on the surface, where it acts as a barrier. The formation of an intumescent layer reduces the heating in the underlying substrate. Ammonium polyphosphate is an intumescent flame retardant. The range of 15–30 wt% is frequently considered for phosphorus-containing flame retardants. Nanoparticle-based flame retardants are rarely applied solely as ignition inhibitors, but if they are well-dispersed with other materials, they can be very effective at low amounts (1–5 wt%). An improved barrier effect is accompanied by a reduction in the peak of the heat release rate. Nanoclays, specifically montmorillonites and carbon nanotubes (CNTs), are recognized as the most commonly used nano-based flame retardants [3,10,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,87].
Recently, the polymer industry has turned to bio-inspired flame retardants derived from natural polymers such as cellulose, lignin, starch, or alginate, to reduce environmental impacts. The oxygen-rich structures of bio-polymers have propelled a relatively low release rate of heat during combustion and oftentimes form char barrier layers. The formation of a barrier layer on the cellulosic surfaces is achieved for all bio-inspired flame inhibitors, which improves the thermal behavior of polymers.
A char layer presents dual positive effects:
i.
By maintaining a constant carbon atom content, which constitutes the polymer structure, and by reducing the volatiles and heat release rate during combustion.
ii.
The case of CNF is demonstrated better thermal behavior compared with char layer acts as a protective barrier that decreases the heat transmission to the underlying polymers and modifies the flame diffusion kinetics via self-intumescent processes.
Onset thermal decomposition of CNF and CNC is reported 350 °C and 200–300 °C, respectively, which in the hemicellulose and lignin. CNC comprising low sulfate presents efficacy thermal stability. In addition, the incorporation of nanoscopic fillers in composite promotes flame retardancy, barrier characteristic, stiffness, and durability compared with fully polymeric materials [3,10,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].
Some studies have investigated the dual effects of biotechnology and nanoscience for introducing innovative flame retardants, e.g., the prominent efficiency of nanoparticles and phosphorus-based compounds on the thermal behavior of cellulose [3,10,29,30,69,88,89]. Ghanadpour et al. [90] found that the presence of phosphate groups in cellulose nanofibers (phosphorylated CNFs) when using diammonium phosphate and urea as flame retardants significantly improved the combustion inhibitor properties of CNFs.

7. Durable, Cost-Effective, and Dual-Function Hydrophobic/Fire-Inhibiting Coatings on Cellulosic Substances

Presently, the production of hydrophobic, flame retardant and eco-friendly cellulosic substances has become an immense challenge for various industries. For this reason, the advent of innovative compounds to simultaneously modify and strengthen against water and fire is essential, particularly for securities, high-quality packaging, and defense applications, which are directly subjected to combustion and liquid droplets. The development of flame retardants with tunable wettability is a fascinating theme that shows great potential for various applications [70,91,92,93,94]. Currently, the textile industry has taken significant steps to develop dual-function ignition inhibitors and waterproofs, but there is still a large gap for obtaining multifunctional features in the wood and paper industry.
A biobased cellulosic aerogel with improved strength with fire retardants by controlling its wettability was applied in a composite of reduced graphene oxide/carboxymethyl cellulose/borate as a cross-linking agent, have produced by Shahzadi et al. [94]. Si and Guo [70] produced a mixture of dopamine-silica trimethylsilyl modified by stearic acid and magnesium hydroxide and used it to develop superhydrophobic paper with improved flame retardancy. Sohbatzadeh et al. [95] introduced multifunctional, eco-friendly, and affordable coatings for firewood and achieved a water contact angle of more than 137.73° using polydimethylsiloxane and hexamethyldisiloxane. Moreover, some authors have mentioned the mixture of ammonium polyphosphate/methylmethacrylate/phosphorus nanoparticles/strontium doped with lanthanide and composite containing phosphonitrile functionalized by allyl, trimethylolpropane tris, and perfluoro-decyl trichlorosilane as multifunctional agents that can be applied as wood surface coatings [96,97,98].
As described above, although some studies have reported the dual effects of fire retardant and water repellency on wood surfaces, there is a need for much more accurate surveys of multifunctional effects using biobased polymers for high-consumption cellulosic surfaces such as paper and paperboard.

8. Conclusions and Outlook

Cellulosic-based substances, as the most commonly applied lignocellulosic biomass derivatives, play a fundamental and vital role in various industries. Nevertheless, cellulosic feedstocks suffer from severe structural changes when subjected to humidity and temperature, which greatly restrict their applications. Moreover, nanocellulosic derivatives present potentialities such as retention aids, strength, and stiffness accelerators in the processing and paper industry, composites, medicine, and various other fields.
However, due to the structural similarity of nanocellulosic substances and cellulose carbohydrates in terms of their wettability and thermal behavior, the modification and induction of flame retardancy and waterproof properties are important to tackle their shortcomings particularly for packaging, securities, and defense purposes. Thus, the advent of green and biobased materials opens novel gateways to obtain multifunctional effects. At present, significant advances have been made in the textile and wood industries in this field. More studies are required to develop multifunctional, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly procedures for paper and paperboard, as the two main applications of cellulosic materials. In this review, we have propounded the basic concepts such as water repellent surfaces, intumescent fire retardancy, and the potential of using cellulose and its nano-substrates for the medication of surfaces. Some innovative multifunctional processes have been addressed as future challenges for the application of lignocellulosic material surfaces, but more efforts are needed in this area.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T., A.G. and B.M.; methodology, M.T., B.M. and M.R.D.-F.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T. and B.M.; writing—review and editing, M.T. and B.M.; visualization, M.T. and B.M.; supervision, A.G. and B.M.; project administration, A.G. and B.M.; funding acquisition, B.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The article was co-financed within the Ministry of Science and Higher Education Programme—“Regional Initiative Excellence” 2019–2022, project no. 005/RID/2018/19 and the Iran National Science Foundation, project no. 98024716. The study was also financed within the framework of National Center for Research and Development, III edition of EEA and Norway grants; The Program ‘Applied Research’ in the frame of Norway Grants 2014–2021/POLNOR 2019 (NOR POLNOR/CellMat4ever/0063/2019-00).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Arbnore Cakaj and Donat Agaj for their help in the preparation of the schematic drawings for this review paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Silva, T.C.F.; Habibi, Y.; Colodette, J.L.; Elder, T.; Lucia, L.A. A Fundamental investigation of the microarchitecture and mechanical properties of tempo-oxidized nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC)-based aerogels. Cellulose 2012, 19, 1945–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhu, H.; Luo, W.; Ciesielski, P.N.; Fang, Z.; Zhu, J.Y.; Henriksson, G.; Himmel, M.E.; Hu, L. Wood-derived materials for green electronics, biological devices, and energy applications. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 9305–9374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sonnier, R.; Taguet, A.; Ferry, L.; Lopez-Cuesta, J.-M. Towards Bio-Based Flame Retardant Polymers; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; ISBN 3-319-67083-2. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ioelovich, M. Cellulose as a nanostructured polymer: A short review. BioResources 2008, 3, 1403–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Klemm, D.; Heublein, B.; Fink, H.-P.; Bohn, A. Cellulose: Fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3358–3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Helanto, K.; Matikainen, L.; Talja, R.; Rojas, O.J. Bio-based polymers for sustainable packaging and biobarriers: A critical review. Bioresources 2019, 14, 4902–4951. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yook, S.; Park, H.; Park, H.; Lee, S.-Y.; Kwon, J.; Youn, H.J. Barrier coatings with various types of cellulose nanofibrils and their barrier properties. Cellulose 2020, 27, 4509–4523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lourenço, A.F.; Godinho, D.; Gamelas, J.A.F.; Sarmento, P.; Ferreira, P.J.T. Carboxymethylated cellulose nanofibrils in papermaking: Influence on filler retention and paper properties. Cellulose 2019, 26, 3489–3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xie, J.; Xu, J.; Cheng, Z.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, T.; Yang, R.; Sheng, J. Facile synthesis of fluorine-free cellulosic paper with excellent oil and grease resistance. Cellulose 2020, 27, 7009–7022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cheng, X.; Zhu, S.; Pan, Y.; Deng, Y.; Shi, L.; Gong, L. Fire retardancy and thermal behaviors of cellulose nanofiber/zinc borate aerogel. Cellulose 2020, 27, 7463–7474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Espinosa, E.; Arrebola, R.I.; Bascón-Villegas, I.; Sánchez-Gutiérrez, M.; Domínguez-Robles, J.; Rodríguez, A. Industrial application of orange tree nanocellulose as papermaking reinforcement agent. Cellulose 2020, 27, 10781–10797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Q.; Xie, D.; Chen, J.; Liu, G.; Yu, M. Superhydrophobic paper fabricated via nanostructured titanium dioxide-functionalized wood cellulose fibers. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 7084–7094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yuan, Z.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, A.; Lv, W.; Wang, Y.; Geng, H.; Wang, J.; Qin, M. Fabrication of cellulose self-assemblies and high-strength ordered cellulose films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 117, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mariano, M.; El Kissi, N.; Dufresne, A. Cellulose nanocrystals and related nanocomposites: Review of some properties and challenges. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2014, 52, 791–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kargarzadeh, H.; Ioelovich, M.; Ahmad, I.; Thomas, S.; Dufresne, A. Handbook of Nanocellulose and Cellulose Nanocomposites; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.: Weinheim, Germany, 2017; pp. 1–49. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, Q.; Xiong, J.; Chen, G.; Xinping, O.; Yu, Z.; Chen, Q.; Yu, M. Facile approach to develop hierarchical roughness Fiber@SiO2 blocks for superhydrophobic paper. Materials 2019, 12, 1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Barati Darband, G.; Aliofkhazraei, M.; Khorsand, S.; Sokhanvar, S.; Kaboli, A. Science and engineering of superhydrophobic surfaces: Review of corrosion resistance, chemical and mechanical stability. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 1763–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ogihara, H.; Xie, J.; Saji, T. Factors determining wettability of superhydrophobic paper prepared by spraying nanoparticle suspensions. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2013, 434, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ghasemlou, M.; Daver, F.; Ivanova, E.P.; Adhikari, B. Bio-inspired sustainable and durable superhydrophobic materials: From nature to market. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 16643–16670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Young, T. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1805, 95, 65–87. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wenzel, R.N. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1936, 28, 988–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cassie, A.; Baxter, S. Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1944, 40, 546–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Price, D.; Anthony, G.; Carty, P. Introduction: Polymer combustion, condensed phase pyrolysis and smoke formation. In Fire Retardant Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 1–30. ISBN 978-1-85573-419-7. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mazela, B.; Batista, A.; Grześkowiak, W. Expandable graphite as a fire retardant for cellulosic materials—A review. Forests 2020, 11, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Laoutid, F.; Bonnaud, L.; Alexandre, M.; Lopez-Cuesta, J.M.; Dubois, P. New prospects in flame retardant polymer materials: From fundamentals to nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2009, 63, 100–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mngomezulu, M.E.; John, M.J.; Jacobs, V.; Luyt, A.S. Review on flammability of biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 111, 149–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Costes, L.; Laoutid, F.; Brohez, S.; Dubois, P. Bio-based flame retardants: When nature meets fire protection. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2017, 117, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zanetti, M.; Kashiwagi, T.; Falqui, L.; Camino, G. Cone calorimeter combustion and gasification studies of polymer layered silicate nanocomposites. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Laachachi, A.; Leroy, E.; Cochez, M.; Ferriol, M.; Lopez Cuesta, J.M. Use of oxide nanoparticles and organoclays to improve thermal stability and fire retardancy of poly (Methyl Methacrylate). Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 89, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Costes, L.; Laoutid, F.; Khelifa, F.; Rose, G.; Brohez, S.; Delvosalle, C.; Dubois, P. Cellulose/phosphorus combinations for sustainable fire retarded polylactide. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 74, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Missoum, K.; Belgacem, M.; Bras, J. Nanofibrillated cellulose surface modification: A review. Materials 2013, 6, 1745–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Davoudpour, Y.; Hossain, S.; Khalil, H.P.S.A.; Haafiz, M.K.M.; Ishak, Z.A.M.; Hassan, A.; Sarker, Z.I. Optimization of high pressure homogenization parameters for the isolation of cellulosic nanofibers using response surface methodology. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 74, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Bhat, A.H.; Ireana Yusra, A.F. Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 963–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moon, R.J.; Martini, A.; Nairn, J.; Simonsen, J.; Youngblood, J. Cellulose nanomaterials review: Structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Arbatan, T.; Zhang, L.; Fang, X.-Y.; Shen, W. Cellulose nanofibers as binder for fabrication of superhydrophobic paper. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 210, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Eichhorn, S.J. Cellulose nanowhiskers: Promising materials for advanced applications. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Blanco, A.; Monte, M.C.; Campano, C.; Balea, A.; Merayo, N.; Negro, C. Nanocellulose for industrial use. In Handbook of Nanomaterials for Industrial Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 74–126. ISBN 978-0-12-813351-4. [Google Scholar]
  38. Oksman Niska, K.; Mathew, A.P.; Bismarck, A.; Rojas, O.J.; Sain, M. Handbook of green materials. In World Scientific Series in Materials and Energy; World Scientific: Hackensack, NJ, USA, 2014; ISBN 978-981-4566-45-2. [Google Scholar]
  39. Nandi, S.; Guha, P. A review on preparation and properties of cellulose nanocrystal-incorporated natural biopolymer. J. Package Technol. Res. 2018, 2, 149–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cao, X.; Chen, Y.; Chang, P.R.; Muir, A.D.; Falk, G. Starch-based nanocomposites reinforced with flax cellulose nanocrystals. Express Polym. Lett. 2008, 2, 502–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mathew, A.P.; Dufresne, A. Morphological investigation of nanocomposites from sorbitol plasticized starch and tunicin whiskers. Biomacromolecules 2002, 3, 609–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Campano, C.; Miranda, R.; Merayo, N.; Negro, C.; Blanco, A. Direct production of cellulose nanocrystals from old newspapers and recycled newsprint. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 173, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Peng, Y.; Gardner, D.J.; Han, Y.; Kiziltas, A.; Cai, Z.; Tshabalala, M.A. Influence of drying method on the material properties of nanocellulose i: Thermostability and crystallinity. Cellulose 2013, 20, 2379–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. George, J.; Ramana, K.V.; Bawa, A.S. Siddaramaiah bacterial cellulose nanocrystals exhibiting high thermal stability and their polymer nanocomposites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 48, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Feldmann, E.-M.; Sundberg, J.; Bobbili, B.; Schwarz, S.; Gatenholm, P.; Rotter, N. Description of a novel approach to engineer cartilage with porous bacterial nanocellulose for reconstruction of a human auricle. J. Biomater. Appl. 2013, 28, 626–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fritz, C.; Jeuck, B.; Salas, C.; Gonzalez, R.; Jameel, H.; Rojas, O.J. Nanocellulose and proteins: Exploiting their interactions for production, immobilization, and synthesis of biocompatible materials. In Cellulose Chemistry and Properties: Fibers, Nanocelluloses and Advanced Materials; Advances in Polymer Science; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 271, pp. 207–224. ISBN 978-3-319-26013-6. [Google Scholar]
  47. Rheshmy, R.; Philip, E.; Paul, S.A.; Madhavan, A.; Sindhu, R.; Binod, P.; Pandey, A.; Sirohi, R. Nanocellulose-based products for sustainable applications-recent trends and possibilities. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2020, 19, 779–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Santos, S.M.; Carbajo, J.M.; Gómez, N.; Ladero, M.; Villar, J.C. Paper reinforcing by in situ growth of bacterial cellulose. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 5882–5893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xiang, Z.; Liu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Lu, F. Effects of physical and chemical structures of bacterial cellulose on its enhancement to paper physical properties. Cellulose 2017, 24, 3513–3523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Siró, I.; Plackett, D. Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: A review. Cellulose 2010, 17, 459–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kalia, S.; Boufi, S.; Celli, A.; Kango, S. Nanofibrillated cellulose: Surface modification and potential applications. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2014, 292, 5–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Müller, R.H.; Jacobs, C.; Kayser, O. Nanosuspensions as particulate drug formulations in therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 47, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Siddiqui, N.; Mills, R.H.; Gardner, D.J.; Bousfield, D. Production and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from wood pulp. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2011, 25, 709–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Habibi, Y.; Mahrouz, M.; Vignon, M.R. Microfibrillated cellulose from the peel of prickly pear fruits. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Almeida, R.O.; Ramos, A.; Alves, L.; Potsi, E.; Ferreira, P.J.T.; Carvalho, M.G.V.S.; Rasteiro, M.G.; Gamelas, J.A.F. Production of nanocellulose gels and films from invasive tree species. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 188, 1003–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lee, S.-Y.; Chun, S.-J.; Kang, I.-A.; Park, J.-Y. Preparation of cellulose nanofibrils by high-pressure homogenizer and cellulose-based composite films. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2009, 15, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ferrer, A.; Filpponen, I.; Rodríguez, A.; Laine, J.; Rojas, O.J. Valorization of residual empty palm fruit bunch fibers (EPFBF) by microfluidization: Production of nanofibrillated cellulose and EPFBF nanopaper. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 125, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Imani, M.; Ghasemian, A.; Dehghani-Firouzabadi, M.R.; Afra, E.; Gane, P.A.C.; Rojas, O.J. Nano-lignocellulose from recycled fibres in coatings from aqueous and ethanolic media: Effect of residual lignin on wetting and offset printing quality. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2019, 34, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Imani, M.; Dimic-Misic, K.; Tavakoli, M.; Rojas, O.J.; Gane, P.A.C. Coupled effects of fibril width, residual and mechanically liberated lignin on the flow, viscoelasticity, and dewatering of cellulosic nanomaterials. Biomacromolecules 2020, 21, 4123–4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, P.; Yu, H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, W.; Wang, X.; Ouyang, M. Concentration effects on the isolation and dynamic rheological behavior of cellulose nanofibers via ultrasonic processing. Cellulose 2013, 20, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Khawas, P.; Deka, S.C. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from culinary banana peel using high-intensity ultrasonication combined with chemical treatment. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 137, 608–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Mazela, B.; Perdoch, W.; Peplińska, B.; Zieliński, M. Influence of chemical pre-treatments and ultrasonication on the dimensions and appearance of cellulose fibers. Materials 2020, 13, 5274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cheng, Q.; Wang, S.; Han, Q. Novel process for isolating fibrils from cellulose fibers by high-intensity ultrasonication. II. fibril characterization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 115, 2756–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, S.; Cheng, Q. A novel process to isolate fibrils from cellulose fibers by high-intensity ultrasonication, part 1: Process optimization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 113, 1270–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Alemdar, A.; Sain, M. Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues—Wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 1664–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, B.; Sain, M. Dispersion of soybean stock-based nanofiber in a plastic matrix. Polym. Int. 2007, 56, 538–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nechyporchuk, O.; Belgacem, M.N.; Bras, J. Production of cellulose nanofibrils: A review of recent advances. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 93, 2–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Deepa, B.; Abraham, E.; Cherian, B.M.; Bismarck, A.; Blaker, J.J.; Pothan, L.A.; Leao, A.L.; de Souza, S.F.; Kottaisamy, M. Structure, morphology and thermal characteristics of banana nano fibers obtained by steam explosion. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 1988–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Abraham, E.; Deepa, B.; Pothan, L.A.; Jacob, M.; Thomas, S.; Cvelbar, U.; Anandjiwala, R. Extraction of nanocellulose fibrils from lignocellulosic fibres: A novel approach. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 1468–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Si, Y.; Guo, Z. Eco-friendly functionalized superhydrophobic recycled paper with enhanced flame-retardancy. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 477, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Wen, G.; Guo, Z. Nonflammable superhydrophobic paper with biomimetic layered structure exhibiting boiling-water resistance and repairable properties for emulsion separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 7042–7052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Balea, A.; Sanchez-Salvador, J.L.; Monte, M.C.; Merayo, N.; Negro, C.; Blanco, A. In situ production and application of cellulose nanofibers to improve recycled paper production. Molecules 2019, 24, 1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Rastogi, V.; Samyn, P. Bio-based coatings for paper applications. Coatings 2015, 5, 887–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Cheng, H.-Y.; Yang, Y.-J.; Li, S.-C.; Hong, J.-Y.; Jang, G.-W. Modification and extrusion coating of polylactic acid films. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 42472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rasal, R.M.; Janorkar, A.V.; Hirt, D.E. Poly (Lactic Acid) modifications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 338–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mekonnen, T.; Mussone, P.; Khalil, H.; Bressler, D. Progress in bio-based plastics and plasticizing modifications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 13379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Kjellgren, H.; Gällstedt, M.; Engström, G.; Järnström, L. Barrier and surface properties of chitosan-coated greaseproof paper. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 65, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Osong, S.H.; Norgren, S.; Engstrand, P.; Lundberg, M.; Hansen, P. Crill: A novel technique to characterize nano-ligno-cellulose. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2014, 29, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Lavoine, N.; Desloges, I.; Dufresne, A.; Bras, J. Microfibrillated cellulose—Its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 90, 735–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Fotie, G.; Limbo, S.; Piergiovanni, L. Manufacturing of food packaging based on nanocellulose: Current advances and challenges. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hubbe, M.A.; Ferrer, A.; Tyagi, P.; Yin, Y.; Salas, C.; Pal, L.; Rojas, O.J. Nanocellulose in thin films, coatings, and plies for packaging applications: A review. BioResources 2017, 12, 2143–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Shen, J.; Qian, X. Use of mineral pigments in fabrication of superhydrophobically engineered cellulosic paper. BioResources 2012, 7, 4495–4498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Karapanagiotis, I.; Grosu, D.; Aslanidou, D.; Aifantis, K.E. Facile method to prepare superhydrophobic and water repellent cellulosic paper. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 219013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Latthe, S.S.; Sutar, R.S.; Kodag, V.S.; Bhosale, A.K.; Kumar, A.M.; Kumar Sadasivuni, K.; Xing, R.; Liu, S. Self—Cleaning superhydrophobic coatings: Potential industrial applications. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019, 128, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ogihara, H.; Xie, J.; Okagaki, J.; Saji, T. Simple method for preparing superhydrophobic paper: Spray-deposited hydrophobic silica nanoparticle coatings exhibit high water-repellency and transparency. Langmuir 2012, 28, 4605–4608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gao, N.; Yan, Y.Y.; Chen, X.Y.; Mee, D.J. Superhydrophobic surfaces with hierarchical structure. Mater. Lett. 2011, 65, 2902–2905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kamali, M.; Khodaparast, Z. Review on recent developments on pulp and paper mill wastewater treatment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 114, 326–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Farah, S.; Anderson, D.G.; Langer, R. Physical and mechanical properties of pla, and their functions in widespread applications—A comprehensive review. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 107, 367–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Murariu, M.; Dubois, P. PLA Composites: From production to properties. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 107, 17–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ghanadpour, M.; Carosio, F.; Larsson, P.T.; Wågberg, L. Phosphorylated cellulose nanofibrils: A renewable nanomaterial for the preparation of intrinsically flame-retardant materials. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 3399–3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Nabipour, H.; Wang, X.; Song, L.; Hu, Y. Hydrophobic and flame-retardant finishing of cotton fabrics for water–oil separation. Cellulose 2020, 27, 4145–4159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Vasiljević, J.; Tomšič, B.; Jerman, I.; Orel, B.; Jakša, G.; Kovač, J.; Simončič, B. Multifunctional superhydrophobic/oleophobic and flame-retardant cellulose fibres with improved ice-releasing properties and passive antibacterial activity prepared via the sol–gel method. J. Sol.-Gel. Sci. Technol. 2014, 70, 385–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, D.; Williams, B.L.; Shrestha, S.B.; Nasir, Z.; Becher, E.M.; Lofink, B.J.; Santos, V.H.; Patel, H.; Peng, X.; Sun, L. Flame retardant and hydrophobic coatings on cotton fabrics via sol-gel and self-assembly techniques. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 505, 892–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Shahzadi, K.; Ge, X.; Sun, Y.; Chen, S.; Jiang, Y. Fire retardant cellulose aerogel with improved strength and hydrophobic surface by one-pot method. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138, 50224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sohbatzadeh, F.; Shabannejad, A.; Ghasemi, M.; Mahmoudsani, Z. Deposition of halogen-free flame retardant and water-repellent coatings on firwood surfaces using the new version of DBD. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 151, 106070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Aldalbahi, A.; El-Naggar, M.E.; Khattab, T.A.; Hossain, M. Preparation of flame-retardant, hydrophobic, ultraviolet protective, and luminescent transparent wood. Luminescence 2021, 36, 1922–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ma, T.; Li, L.; Wang, Q.; Guo, C. Construction of intumescent flame retardant and hydrophobic coating on wood substrates based on thiol-ene click chemistry without photoinitiators. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 177, 107357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, Z.; Shen, X.; Qian, T.; Xu, K.; Sun, Q.; Jin, C. Fabrication of superhydrophobic Mg/Al layered double hydroxide (LDH) coatings on medium density fiberboards (MDFs) with flame retardancy. Materials 2018, 11, 1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Illustration of hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces based on water contact angle measurement.
Figure 1. Illustration of hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces based on water contact angle measurement.
Materials 15 00082 g001
Figure 2. Functional mode of flame retardants.
Figure 2. Functional mode of flame retardants.
Materials 15 00082 g002
Figure 3. Different tests used to measure the effects of combustion inhibitors. Limiting oxygen index (a), vertical flammability (b), cone calorimeter (c), and pyrolysis-combustion flow calorimeter (d).
Figure 3. Different tests used to measure the effects of combustion inhibitors. Limiting oxygen index (a), vertical flammability (b), cone calorimeter (c), and pyrolysis-combustion flow calorimeter (d).
Materials 15 00082 g003aMaterials 15 00082 g003b
Figure 4. A schematic of cellulose biopolymer derivation from wood, which is converted to CNF, CNC, or BC, as the three major nanoscale forms of cellulose.
Figure 4. A schematic of cellulose biopolymer derivation from wood, which is converted to CNF, CNC, or BC, as the three major nanoscale forms of cellulose.
Materials 15 00082 g004
Table 1. Outstanding properties of commonly used procedures for nanocellulosic substance production.
Table 1. Outstanding properties of commonly used procedures for nanocellulosic substance production.
Type of MethodFeaturesAdvantagesDisadvantagesReferences
Grinding/Super grindingThe fibrillation process of fibers occurs through the passing of cellulose slurries between rotor and stator, which produce shear forces that separate the nanofibersNo need for additional mechanical pretreatmentWood fibers can expunge the grooves of the discs
Maintenance and replacement of discs are costly and time-consuming
[31,37,50,51]
High-pressure homogenizationThis method involves suspension crossing via a narrow nozzle exposed to the high-pressure pistonHigher pressure gives a higher yield
A homogeneous net is received
Increasing the specific surface area
Homogenization is blocked by incomplete separation of nanofibers
Irreversibility of changed fibers
[31,37,52,53,54,55]
MicrofluidizationMicrofluidizer operates with a constant shear force opposite to the homogenizer (constant pressure)
Suspension is pumped with high pressure by a z-shaped channel
Nanofibers can be produced with a homogeneous size distributionProcess repetition (even up to 10 times) is required for better fibrillation[15,31,37,56,57,58,59]
High-intensity ultrasonicationKnown as the conventional mechanical lab-scale procedure in aqueous media in which the suspensions are subjected to hydrodynamic forcesThe fibrillation process depends on the concentration of fiber, size of the fiber, time, and temperatureLow-scale production[31,37,60,61,62,63,64]
CryocrushingMechanical fibrillation occurs for frozen cellulose, which produces fibers with 0.1-1 μm diametersThe crushing process requires liquid nitrogen and low temperaturesHigh energy consumption
Low efficiency
Expensive
[34,37,50,65,66]
Steam explosionSuspension is rapidly subjected to steam with intensifying pressure Nanofibers are constituted by the swift release of pressureNon-uniformity of the CNF quality[34,37,67,68,69]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tavakoli, M.; Ghasemian, A.; Dehghani-Firouzabadi, M.R.; Mazela, B. Cellulose and Its Nano-Derivatives as a Water-Repellent and Fire-Resistant Surface: A Review. Materials 2022, 15, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010082

AMA Style

Tavakoli M, Ghasemian A, Dehghani-Firouzabadi MR, Mazela B. Cellulose and Its Nano-Derivatives as a Water-Repellent and Fire-Resistant Surface: A Review. Materials. 2022; 15(1):82. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010082

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tavakoli, Mehrnoosh, Ali Ghasemian, Mohammad Reza Dehghani-Firouzabadi, and Bartłomiej Mazela. 2022. "Cellulose and Its Nano-Derivatives as a Water-Repellent and Fire-Resistant Surface: A Review" Materials 15, no. 1: 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010082

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop