Next Article in Journal
Ultrasound Study of Magnetic and Non-Magnetic Nanoparticle Agglomeration in High Viscous Media
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on the Influence of Reinforced Particles Spatial Arrangement on the Neutron Shielding Performance of the Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Validation and Evaluation of the Bending Properties of Additively Manufactured Metallic Cellular Scaffold Structures for Bone Tissue Engineering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study on the Design, Preparation, and Performance Evaluation of Heat-Resistant Interlayer-Polyimide-Resin-Based Neutron-Shielding Materials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Water Corrosion of Tungsten Target for Accelerator-Driven Neutron Source

Shaanxi Engineering Research Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Advanced Nuclear Energy and Technology, School of Nuclear Science and Technology, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(10), 3448; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103448
Submission received: 19 April 2022 / Revised: 4 May 2022 / Accepted: 4 May 2022 / Published: 11 May 2022

Abstract

:
The water corrosion of tungsten as a target material can affect the safe operation of accelerator-driven neutron source. This paper reported the corrosion behaviors of tungsten in ultrapure water and tap water for 7, 14, 21, 30 and 60 days. Moreover, ICP-MS, XRD, XPS, SEM-EDS and LSCM were used to analyze the components in solutions, crystalline structures, chemical compositions and surface morphologies. It was found that the dissolution of tungsten, due to corrosion, reached its maximum between 30 days and 60 days in both solutions. The cube-shape substance, CaWO4, was the main corrosion product after tungsten in tap water. The tungsten oxide was changed from WO3 to WO2 during the corrosion of tungsten in ultrapure water. Compared with tungsten in ultrapure water, tungsten in tap water had its surface completely destroyed, with a dense diamond shape. Therefore, based on the analysis from this study, the corrosion mechanisms of tungsten in ultrapure and tap water were revealed.

1. Introduction

Neutron has received considerable attention in earth, energy, environmental sciences and clinical applications due to its advantages of uniqueness and non-destruction [1,2]. The types of neutron sources under construction are mainly include reactor neutron source [3], accelerator-driven neutron source [4], and isotopic neutron source [5]. Recent developments in the field of neutron sources have reignited interest in accelerator-driven neutron sources to supply high-intensity neutron beams to support and develop neutron activities [6]. Tungsten is mainly used as the target material of accelerator-driven neutron source, especially spallation neutron source [7]. For example, the China Spallation Neutron Source (CSNS) is designed to accelerate proton beam pulses to 1.6 GeV kinetic energy at 25 Hz repetition rate, striking a solid metal target (tungsten) to produce spallation neutrons. Due to the high density beam power of about 240 kW leading to high heat density—which is similar to the European Spallation Source (ESS), whereby neutrons are released from a rotating tungsten target when it is hit by 2 GeV protons provided by a superconducting linac at an unprecedented 5 MW of average beam power—the tungsten target cooling is necessary for its safe operation [8,9].
Water cooling is one of the most widely used cooling methods to decrease the target temperature. However, water corrosion will occur on the tungsten surface due to the contact of water with tungsten, thus impacting the safe operation of the target system. Li et al. reported that the cracking of tungsten occurred in a water-cooled divertor target, resulting in target failure [10]. Jiang et al. found remarkable intergranular corrosion as well as slight dissolution of the tungsten in a flowing water system at 20 °C [11]. Collins et al. demonstrated that significant weight loss occurred over a very short period during the corrosion of tungsten in water [12]. Moreover, the water corrosion of tungsten causes the decrease in the delivered neutron flux [13]. Therefore, analyzing the corrosion behavior of the tungsten target in the cooling water is essential for selecting cooling medium and anti-corrosion methods.
In this work, the corrosion behaviors of tungsten in two environments were studied to compare the corrosion effects of tap water and ultrapure water. In order to reveal the corrosion mechanism, the tungsten target was immersed in water for 7, 14, 21, 30 and 60 days, and the corrosion temperature was set to 50 °C (the standard of maximum temperature of coolant) [14]. The physicochemical characterizations as-received and corrosive tungsten samples were performed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscope-energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) and laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM). Additionally, the element components of residual aqueous solution were determined by using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Additionally, according to the above measurements, the corrosion mechanisms of tungsten in tap water and ultrapure water were proposed.

2. Materials and Experiments

2.1. Materials

Purchased from Qinghe Haoxuan Metal Material Co., Ltd., tungsten samples in blocks with a purity of 99.95% were cut to 10 × 10 × 2 mm by laser. Before the corrosion experiments, all tungsten samples were washed with propanol and ultrapure water, and then dried at 80 °C overnight. The tap water was taken from Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China, with the major components for this study given in Table 1 from ICP-MS. Moreover, the ultrapure water used in this study was with the resistivity of 18.25 MΩ•cm.

2.2. Corrosion Experiments

For each corrosion experiment, 25 mL water (tap water and ultrapure water) was added in a polypropylene centrifuge tube, in which a tungsten sample was loaded. Then, the tube was kept in a temperature box at 50 °C for 7, 14, 21, 30 and 60 days. On completion of the corrosion experiments, the corrosive tungsten sample was taken out from the centrifuge tube and then washed with propanol and ultrapure water and dried at 80 °C overnight for further characterizations. Meanwhile, the residual aqueous solutions after corrosion were kept in the refrigerator for ICP-MS measurements.

2.3. Physicochemical Characterizations

ICP-MS measurements were performed on a spectrometer (NexIONTM 350D, Perkin Elmer, MA, USA) to determine the contents of Mg, Fe, Na and Ca, and W dissolved from the tungsten samples in residual aqueous solutions. The crystalline structures of as-received tungsten and corrosive tungsten samples were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 ADVANCE, Bruker, MA, USA). The 2θ scanning range of XRD patterns was set to be 20∼60° with a step size of 0.02°. The chemical components of tungsten on the surface were detected with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, AXIS ULtrabld, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), with an AI monochromatic energy resolution of 0.48 eV. The binding energies were calibrated with a binding energy of C 1s peak of 284.8 eV. The scanning electron microscopy with an energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM-EDS, JEOL 7800F, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used to determine the morphologies and the elemental distributions on the surfaces of as-received and corrosive tungsten samples. The 3-D images for the surfaces of as-received and corrosive tungsten were collected by a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM, OLS4000, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. ICP-MS

The elements concentrations of residual aqueous solutions were determined by ICP-MS (Figure 1). Since the corrosion of tungsten in ultrapure water did not involve other elements, only W changed, as shown in Figure 1a, which showed that the concentration of W increased until it reaches the maximum between 30 days and 60 days, and then decreased, as did W in tap water. This may be because the dissolved W was re-adsorbed to the surface after reaching maximum. Ca in the corrosion solution of tap water changed more obviously than other elements (Mg, Fe and Na), and the concentration decreased with the increase in corrosion time, indicating that the Ca-containing substance was the main corrosion product for tungsten in the tap water.

3.2. XRD

XRD measurements were used to determine the crystalline structures of corrosion products on the tungsten surface. As shown in Figure 2, two peaks representing W at 40.43° and 58.37° were detected on the surface of as-received tungsten [15]. Moreover, no other peak was detected after corrosion, meaning that no phase change occurred on the surface during the corrosion of tungsten in ultrapure water. On the other hand, several peaks representing CaWO4 were observed after corrosion in tap water (Figure 3) [16]. CaWO4 may be the main corrosion product on the surface of tungsten in tap water. Prior study had noted that the crystallinity was related to the intensity of the strongest diffraction peak [17]. In this study, the relative intensity of the strongest CaWO4 peak at 28.78° gradually increased with the increase in corrosion time, indicating that the content and crystallinity of CaWO4 on the surface was increasing after corrosion in tap water.

3.3. XPS

To determine the chemical compositions of tungsten surface, we characterized the as-received tungsten and the corrosive tungsten through XPS analysis. Since the tungsten in ultrapure water during the whole corrosion process had spectra with a similar shape, as did the tungsten in tap water, only spectral analysis of tungsten in tap and ultrapure water for 60 days are included here. From Figure 4, the XPS spectra of as-received tungsten and tungsten in ultrapure water included several peaks representing W oxides and W metal, respectively, and the spectra of tungsten in tap water were missing two peaks representing W metal. Moreover, a shoulder peak appeared at 41.36 eV for tungsten in tap water, which was assigned to the loss feature of WO3 [18]. Therefore, the peaks at 37.73 eV and 35.56 eV of tungsten in tap water were attributed to WO42− [19]. A pair of peaks at 350.48 eV and 346.98 eV representing CaWO4 and two satellite peaks at 355.14 eV and 351.64 eV were observed in Figure 5 [20], which were consistent with XRD results that the main corrosion product in tap water was CaWO4. WO3 is the most common oxide of tungsten [21]. W metal and WO3 can dissolve in aqueous alkaline (alkaline tap water in this study) solutions to form tungstate ions, WO42- (Equations (1) and (2)) [22], resulting in the disappearance of the peaks of W meal and W oxides in XPS spectra of tungsten in tap water.
W + 8 OH   WO 4 2 + 4 H 2 O + 6 e
WO 3 + 2 OH   WO 4 2 + H 2 O
To further determine the valence states of W in the surface oxides of as-received tungsten and tungsten in ultrapure water, deconvolutions of spectra on the W 4f levels were performed. As can be seen from Figure 6, the W 4f spectra consisted of several components representing different oxidation states of tungsten, and the peak positions are given in Table 2 [23]. Although these two tungsten samples had the same kind of oxide, the spectra of tungsten in ultrapure water showed a shoulder peak, indicating a possible change in the ratio between oxides. After the data analysis from XPS fitting, we found that the dominant oxidation state in as-received tungsten was W6+ for WO3 (58%), while W4+ (32.47%) for WO2 was dominant for tungsten in ultrapure water [24]. This phenomenon indicated the oxide valance change of tungsten occurred on the surface during the corrosion of tungsten in ultrapure water.

3.4. Surface Morphology

The surface morphology of tungsten was observed by SEM, and the high magnification was circled with a green frame. In Figure 7, blocky corrosion products that appeared on the surface of tungsten in tap water were distributed sporadically. For tungsten corrosion in tap water (Figure 8), compared with as-received tungsten, the surface had no obvious change at low magnification before 14 days, while the surface was completely destroyed and featured a dense diamond shape at high magnification. From 21 days, cube-shaped corrosion products can be observed at low magnification and distributed more densely as the corrosion time increased.
To determine the compositions of corrosion products, EDS scanning was performed on the corrosion products in both environments (Figure 9 and Figure 10). It can be found that the main component of corrosion products of tungsten in tap water was the element of O, but the current method cannot measure the specific composition. As for tungsten in the tap water, elements mapping showed the aggregation of Ca and O, which further confirmed the previous analysis that the corrosion product was calcium tungstate. Moreover, the 3D images of tungsten from LSCM demonstrated that compared with the surface of as-received tungsten and tungsten in ultrapure water, CaWO4 protruded significantly on the surface of tungsten after corrosion in tap water (Figure 11).

3.5. Corrosion Mechanism

According to the above characterizations, the corrosion mechanisms of tungsten in ultrapure water and tap water were revealed (Figure 12). The dissolution of W reached a maximum between 30 days and 60 days in both solutions and then was re-adsorbed to the tungsten surface. In ultrapure water, with the increase in corrosion time, the dominant oxide valence on the surface changed from W6+ to W4+. After corrosion, the crystalline structures of the surface did not change, and the corrosion products were distributed in blocks. In tap water, Ca was the main element of the corrosion products. Additionally, with the increase in corrosion time, Ca gradually deposited on the tungsten surface, and combined with the WO42- generated on the surface of W to form CaWO4 on the surface in cube shape. The tungsten surface was completely destroyed due to exposure to tap water, featuring a dense diamond shape.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we investigated the corrosion behaviors of tungsten in ultrapure water and tap water for 7, 14, 21, 30 and 60 days. Based on the characterizations of ICP-MS, XRD, XPS, SEM-EDS and LSCM, the corresponding corrosion mechanisms were subsequently proposed, offering guidance for the selection of anti-corrosion methods. The main conclusions of this study are as follows:
(1)
The corrosion-caused dissolution of tungsten reached its maximum between 30 days and 60 days in both solutions. Compared with other elements (Mg, Fe and Na), Ca in tap water was more easily adsorbed on the surface of tungsten, indicating the Ca-containing substance was the main corrosion product in tap water.
(2)
CaWO4, the main corrosion product, was detected on the surface of tungsten after exposure to tap water. Moreover, the surface oxide valence of tungsten changed (from W6+ to W4+) during corrosion in ultrapure water.
(3)
The corrosion product in ultrapure water was blocky on the tungsten surface, while CaWO4 was in a cube shape on the surface after corrosion in the tap water, and the surface was completely destroyed, featuring a dense diamond shape.
(4)
During the construction of the neutron source, the use of ultrapure water with the resistivity of 18.25 MΩ•cm can lead to high costs. According to the results of this study, Ca2+ in tap water is the precursor of the main corrosion products (CaWO4). In order to reduce the construction cost, it is only necessary to remove Ca from tap water and use it as cooling medium.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.X. and S.W.; methodology, Y.X. and Q.S.; validation, Y.X., S.W. and J.W.; investigation, Y.X., Q.S. and Y.H.; resources, S.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.X.; writing—review and editing, X.L., Z.Q. and S.W.; visualization, Y.X.; supervision, S.W.; funding acquisition, S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation under Grant No. 2020B1515120035.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liang, L.; Rinaldi, R.; Schober, H. Neutron Applications in Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  2. Malouff, T.D.; Seneviratne, D.S.; Ebner, D.K.; Stross, W.C.; Waddle, M.R.; Trifiletti, D.M.; Krishnan, S. Boron neutron capture therapy: A review of clinical applications. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Harling, O.K.; Riley, K.J. Fission reactor neutron sources for neutron capture therapy—A critical review. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2003, 62, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Anderson, I.; Andreani, C.; Carpenter, J.; Festa, G.; Gorini, G.; Loong, C.-K.; Senesi, R. Research opportunities with compact accelerator-driven neutron sources. Phys. Rep. 2016, 654, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Akkaya, G. The calculation of self-shielding correction factors for large samples in 241Am–Be isotopic neutron source. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2022, 179, 109990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kiyanagi, Y. Neutron applications developing at compact accelerator-driven neutron sources. AAPPS Bull. 2021, 31, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kawai, M.; Kikuchi, K.; Kurishita, H.; Li, J.-F.; Furusaka, M. Fabrication of a tantalum-clad tungsten target for KENS. J. Nucl. Mater. 2001, 296, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Garoby, R.; Vergara, A.; Danared, H.; Alonso, I.; Bargallo, E.; Cheymol, B.; Darve, C.; Eshraqi, M.; Hassanzadegan, H.; Jansson, A. The European spallation source design. Phys. Scr. 2017, 93, 014001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wei, J.; Fu, S.-N.; Tang, J.-Y.; Tao, J.-Z.; Wang, D.-S.; Wang, F.-W.; Wang, S. China Spallation Neutron Source-an overview of application prospects. Chin. Phys. C 2009, 33, 1033. [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, M.; Werner, E.; You, J.-H. Fracture mechanical analysis of tungsten armor failure of a water-cooled divertor target. Fusion Eng. Des. 2014, 89, 2716–2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, Y.; Yang, J.; Xie, Z.; Fang, Q. Enhanced Erosion–Corrosion Resistance of Tungsten by Carburizing Using Spark Plasma Sintering Technique. Materials 2020, 13, 2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Collins, J.T. Erosion/Corrosion of Machinable Tungsten in Water; Argonne National Lab.: Argonne, IL, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nelson, A.; O’Toole, J.; Valicenti, R.; Maloy, S. Fabrication of a tantalum-clad tungsten target for LANSCE. J. Nucl. Mater. 2012, 431, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gohar, M.Y.; Sofu, T.; Zhong, Z.; Belch, H.; Naberezhnev, D. Target Design Optimization for an Electron Accelerator Driven Subcritical Facility with Circular and Square Beam Profiles; Argonne National Lab. (ANL): Argonne, IL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bolokang, A.S.; Phasha, M.J.; Oliphant, C.; Motaung, D. XRD analysis and microstructure of milled and sintered V, W, C, and Co powders. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2011, 29, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.; Ma, J.; Tao, J.; Zhu, X.; Zhou, J.; Zhao, Z.; Xie, L.; Tian, H. Synthesis of CaWO4 nanoparticles by a molten salt method-ScienceDirect. Mater. Lett. 2006, 60, 291–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Inoue, M.; Hirasawa, I. The relationship between crystal morphology and XRD peak intensity on CaSO4· 2H2O. J. Cryst. Growth 2013, 380, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Xu, T.; Adamsen, K.C.; Li, Z.; Lammich, L.; Lauritsen, J.V.; Wendt, S. WO3 Monomers Supported on Anatase TiO2 (101),−(001), and Rutile TiO2 (110): A Comparative STM and XPS Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126, 2493–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ryu, J.H.; Bang, S.Y.; Kim, W.S.; Park, G.S.; Kim, K.M.; Yoon, J.-W.; Shim, K.B.; Koshizaki, N. Microstructure and optical properties of nanocrystalline CaWO4 thin films deposited by pulsed laser ablation in room temperature. J. Alloy. Compd. 2007, 441, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, X.; Xu, Z.; Sun, B.; Liu, J.; Cao, Y.; Qiao, H.; Huang, Y.; Pang, X. Photo-Induced Multiple-State Memory Behaviour in Non-Volatile Bipolar Resistive-Switching Devices. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 18, 2650–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Emsley, J. The Elements, 2nd ed.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rieck, G.D. Tungsten and Its Compounds; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  23. Khan, A.; Al-Muhaish, N.; Mohamedkhair, A.; Khan, M.Y.; Qamar, M.; Yamani, Z.; Drmosh, Q. Oxygen-deficient non-crystalline tungsten oxide thin films for solar-driven water oxidation. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2022, 580, 121409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Atuchin, V.; Pokrovsky, L.; Khyzhun, O.Y.; Sinelnichenko, A.; Ramana, C. Surface crystallography and electronic structure of potassium yttrium tungstate. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 104, 033518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Changes in element concentration of (a) tungsten in ultrapure water and (b) tungsten in tap water for various corrosion days.
Figure 1. Changes in element concentration of (a) tungsten in ultrapure water and (b) tungsten in tap water for various corrosion days.
Materials 15 03448 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of as-received tungsten and corrosive tungsten in ultrapure water for 7, 14, 21, 30 and 60 days. ◆ is the sign representing a peak belong to tungsten (W).
Figure 2. XRD patterns of as-received tungsten and corrosive tungsten in ultrapure water for 7, 14, 21, 30 and 60 days. ◆ is the sign representing a peak belong to tungsten (W).
Materials 15 03448 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns of as-received tungsten and corrosive tungsten in tap water for 7, 14, 21, 30 and 60 days. ◆ and • are the signs representing a peak belong to tungsten (W) and CaWO4, respectively.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of as-received tungsten and corrosive tungsten in tap water for 7, 14, 21, 30 and 60 days. ◆ and • are the signs representing a peak belong to tungsten (W) and CaWO4, respectively.
Materials 15 03448 g003
Figure 4. XPS spectra of the W 4f levels for as-received tungsten and tungsten in ultrapure water and tap water for 60 days.
Figure 4. XPS spectra of the W 4f levels for as-received tungsten and tungsten in ultrapure water and tap water for 60 days.
Materials 15 03448 g004
Figure 5. The deconvolution of spectra for the Ca 2p levels of tungsten in tap water for 60 days.
Figure 5. The deconvolution of spectra for the Ca 2p levels of tungsten in tap water for 60 days.
Materials 15 03448 g005
Figure 6. The deconvolution of spectra for the W 4f levels of (a) as-received tungsten and (b) tungsten in ultrapure water for 60 days.
Figure 6. The deconvolution of spectra for the W 4f levels of (a) as-received tungsten and (b) tungsten in ultrapure water for 60 days.
Materials 15 03448 g006
Figure 7. SEM images of (a) as-received tungsten and tungsten in ultrapure water for (b) 7 days, (c) 14 days, (d) 21 days, (e) 30 days and (f) 60 days. (The image in green square is with high magnification).
Figure 7. SEM images of (a) as-received tungsten and tungsten in ultrapure water for (b) 7 days, (c) 14 days, (d) 21 days, (e) 30 days and (f) 60 days. (The image in green square is with high magnification).
Materials 15 03448 g007
Figure 8. SEM images of (a) as-received tungsten and tungsten in tap water for (b) 7 days, (c) 14 days, (d) 21 days, (e) 30 days and (f) 60 days. (The image in green square is with high magnification).
Figure 8. SEM images of (a) as-received tungsten and tungsten in tap water for (b) 7 days, (c) 14 days, (d) 21 days, (e) 30 days and (f) 60 days. (The image in green square is with high magnification).
Materials 15 03448 g008
Figure 9. Elements distributions of the surface of tungsten in ultrapure water for 60 days. ((a) is the SEM image; (b) is the mapping of O element).
Figure 9. Elements distributions of the surface of tungsten in ultrapure water for 60 days. ((a) is the SEM image; (b) is the mapping of O element).
Materials 15 03448 g009
Figure 10. Elements distributions of the surface of tungsten in tap water for 60 days. ((a) is the SEM image; (b) is the mapping of Ca element; (c) is the mapping of O element).
Figure 10. Elements distributions of the surface of tungsten in tap water for 60 days. ((a) is the SEM image; (b) is the mapping of Ca element; (c) is the mapping of O element).
Materials 15 03448 g010
Figure 11. 3D images of LSCM for (a) as-received tungsten, (b) tungsten in ultrapure water for 60 days and (c) tungsten in tap water for 60 days.
Figure 11. 3D images of LSCM for (a) as-received tungsten, (b) tungsten in ultrapure water for 60 days and (c) tungsten in tap water for 60 days.
Materials 15 03448 g011
Figure 12. Schematic diagram of corrosion mechanism of tungsten in ultrapure water and tap water.
Figure 12. Schematic diagram of corrosion mechanism of tungsten in ultrapure water and tap water.
Materials 15 03448 g012
Table 1. The elements components of tap water.
Table 1. The elements components of tap water.
MgFeNaCa
Concentration, mg/L12.30.40481.934.5
Table 2. The peak positions of all W oxides in XPS spectra of as-received tungsten and tungsten in ultrapure water for 60 days.
Table 2. The peak positions of all W oxides in XPS spectra of as-received tungsten and tungsten in ultrapure water for 60 days.
W(VI), eVW(V), eVW(IV), eVW(0), eV
4f5/24f7/24f5/24f7/24f5/24f7/24f5/24f7/2
As-received37.7935.6235.8033.6333.8831.7133.1330.96
Ultrapure water for 60 days37.5535.3835.2933.1234.0431.8733.2831.11
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xie, Y.; Sun, Q.; Hu, Y.; Li, X.; Qiao, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, S. Water Corrosion of Tungsten Target for Accelerator-Driven Neutron Source. Materials 2022, 15, 3448. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103448

AMA Style

Xie Y, Sun Q, Hu Y, Li X, Qiao Z, Wang J, Wang S. Water Corrosion of Tungsten Target for Accelerator-Driven Neutron Source. Materials. 2022; 15(10):3448. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103448

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xie, Yupeng, Qiuyu Sun, Yaocheng Hu, Xiaobo Li, Zhaopeng Qiao, Jie Wang, and Sheng Wang. 2022. "Water Corrosion of Tungsten Target for Accelerator-Driven Neutron Source" Materials 15, no. 10: 3448. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103448

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop