Next Article in Journal
Mechanical and Durability Performance of Coconut Fiber Reinforced Concrete: A State-of-the-Art Review
Previous Article in Journal
Ab Initio Study on Dopant Relaxation Mechanism in Ti and Ce Cationically Substituted in Wurtzite Gallium Nitride
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 10
10.3390/ma15103597
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hydrophilic CO-Releasing Material of PEGlyated Ruthenium Carbonyl Complex

by
Xiao Zhang
1,
Nan Guo
2,
Shuhong Yang
1,
Huma Khan
1 and
Weiqiang Zhang
1,*
1
Key Laboratory of Applied Surface and Colloid Chemistry Ministry of Education (MOE), School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, China
2
School of Chemical Engineering, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(10), 3597; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103597
Submission received: 18 February 2022 / Revised: 1 May 2022 / Accepted: 11 May 2022 / Published: 18 May 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The poor water-solubility and instability of Ru(II) carbonyl complex hamper the therapeutic application as CO releasing materials (CO-RMs). To enhance the hydrophilicity and bio-utility of CO, a robust Ru(I) carbonyl sawhorse skeleton was grafted with water-soluble PEGylated sidearm. In this case, 12 PEGylated sawhorse Ru2(CO)4 complexes were prepared with satisfactory yields and characterized by IR and 1H- and 13C- NMR. X-ray diffraction analysis of CO-RM 8, 13 and 14 revealed the featured diruthenium sawhorse skeleton and PEGylated axial ligands. The flask-shaking method measures the water-solubility of CO-RMs, indicating that both bridging carboxylate ligands and PEGlyated axial ligands regulate the hydrophilicity of these CO-RMs. Under photolysis conditions, CO-RM 4–13 sustainable released therapeutic amounts of CO in the myoglobin assay. The correlation of the CO release kinetics and hydrophilicity of CO-RMs demonstrated that the more hydrophilic CO-RM released CO faster. The biological test found that the low cytotoxic CO-RM 4 showed a specific anticancer activity toward HT-29 tumour cells.

1. Introduction

Recently, biological experiments using transition metal carbonyl complexes as CO-releasing molecules (CO-RM) [1,2] revealed the therapeutic effects of endogenous CO. These effects include anti-inflammatory function, vasodilatation, anti-apoptotic, anti-proliferative, and anti-hypoxia [3]. The organ protection of CO is desirable and attractive because controlling a low concentration of CO indeed protects donor tissues from ischaemia-reperfusion injury [4]. The ruthenium carbonyl complex, [Ru(CO)3Cl2]2, CO-RM-02, mainly were fascinating because it attenuated acute hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats by reducing serum AST/ALT levels and improved the liver histology score [5,6]. However, the poor solubility of CO-RM-02 and its unregulated CO releasing property in aqueous systems hinder its therapeutic application under physiological conditions [7,8]. To solve the water-solubility issue, CO-RM-02 was solubilized in DMSO, which readily reacts with the CO-RM dimer to generate DMSO-ligated monomeric ruthenium carbonyl species [9]. Motterlini and Mann found that glycinate ligands chelate to the Ru (II) carbonyl moiety, and the corresponding Ru(II) complex (CO-RM-03) was water- soluble. Unfortunately, CO-RM-03 degrades rapidly in human plasma, and the half-life of CO release is only 3.6 min [10]. In fact, due to the intrinsic hydrophobic nature of CO, most metal carbonyl complexes have minimal solubility in an aqueous solution. Although a few ionic transition metal carbonyl complexes are water-soluble, the CO release tests indicated that the M-CO bonds of simple ionic CO-RM degraded quickly under complicated physiological conditions and produced unpredictable side effects, such as blocking blood vessels and causing cytotoxic effects. Increasing the water-solubility and finely controlling the CO release kinetics of transition metal complexes are challenges in therapeutic CO-RMs [11,12,13,14,15].
Introducing the hydrophilic functional groups into the coordination sphere of transition metal complexes is an efficient way to enhance the water-solubility of the leading CO-RM structure (Scheme 1). The hydrophilic auxiliary ligands bearing carboxylic acid groups improve the hydrophilicity of (Mo(CO)3(CNCR′R″CO2R‴)3 [16] and [Mn(CO)4{S2CNMe(CH2CO2H)}] [17], respectively. The classic water-soluble phosphine ligand, P(CH2OH)3 coordinates to Ru(I) center and significantly enhances the solubility of Photo-CO-RM, 2, 2′-bipyridine tricarbonyl rhenium(I) in PBS solution [18]. Conjugation of transition metal carbonyl moiety with the hydrophilic biomacromolecules also improves the water solubility and biocompatibility of CO-RMs. The micellar bearing [RuCl(glycinate)(CO)3] [19], peptide conjugates of [Mn(CO)3(tmp)]+ [20], and a photo-CO-RM based on vitaminB12, namely, B12-ReCO-RM2 [21] were fabricated to deliver CO in the aqueous system. However, the synthesis and purification of these hydrophilic CO-RMs are sophisticated. More importantly, the CO release kinetics of most of the water-soluble CO-RMs are unpredictable and thus cannot satisfy the basic requirements of ADME proprieties for CO pre-drugs [22]. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a non-ionic polymer that improves water solubility and selective drug absorption. Inspired by the idea of the PEG-polymer linking drug system proposed by H. Ringsdorf [23], and the subsequent precedents of PEGlyated therapeutic agents by A. Abuchowski [24]. Herein, CO-RMs, which are PEGlylated Sawhorse Ru carbonyl complexes, were synthesized by incorporating a robust CO-RM leading structure [Ru2(CO)4(COOR)2] with functionalized PEG chains. X-ray single-crystal analysis revealed that the designed PEG esters of amino acids coordinate to Ru(I) of the sawhorse CO-RM lead structure. From the logP measurements and myoglobin assay experiments, it was found that these hydrophilic CO-RMs show a well-controlled CO release property with broad kinetics under physiologic conditions.

2. Results and Discussion

Since 1969 when J. Lewis first reported that Ru2(CO)4(O(C=O)R)2L2, features a sawhorse structure [25], a considerable number of the ruthenium(I) carbonyl complexes have been prepared and characterized. However, the inherited poor water-solubility and biological incompatibility of sawhorse ruthenium complexes are obstacles to their application in in the biological system [26]. To increase the hydrophilicity of these ruthenium carbonyl complexes, the water-soluble amino acid glycol and PEG esters were tethered at the axial position of the sawhorse structure, respectively (Scheme 2). The thermolysis of Ru3(CO)12 1 in acetic acid affords polymeric sawhorse ruthenium carbonyl 2, and the sequential ligand substitution reaction using glycine methyl esters flourishes the PEGylated sawhorse complexes 4–7 with 61–74% yield. The light-yellow products 4–7 are moisture and air-stable easily handled without proof from oxygen or light. The thermolysis of Ru3(CO)12 1 and aromatic carboxylic acid at 120 °C in toluene generates hexacarbonyl Ru(I) intermediates 2 and with the characteristic carbonyl bands at 2103 w, 2079 vs, 2035 vs, 2004 vs and 1938 w cm−1. The axial carbonyl ligands of 2 are labile and can readily be substituted by glycine esters of ethylene glycol monomethyl ester. Thermolysis using various bridged aromatic carboxylic acids afforded 8–15, and FT-IR, 1H-NMR, mass spectrometry and elemental analysis were used to fully characterize complexes 4–15. The IR spectra of the Ru(I) complexes identified the four characteristic carbonyl bands at 2028–1938 cm−1 of sawhorse Ru2(CO)4 complexes whilst the bridged-carboxylate ligand showed C=O band at 1743 cm−1. The NMR spectra revealed more detailed information about the molecular structures of these ruthenium complexes with more details. In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 4, the bridged-acetate was observed as a singlet at δ 1.94 ppm, and the protons of NH2 appeared as a singlet at δ 2.90 ppm. CH2 and OCH3 of axial ethylene glycol monomethyl ester glycine ester appeared as triplets at δ 4.35, 3.75, 3.62 ppm, and a singlet at 3.39 ppm, respectively. The 13C{1H} NMR spectrum of 4 shows three types of CO resonances, and the Ru bonded carbonyl groups are at δ 204 ppm, the bridging carboxylate is at δ 172 ppm, and the ester group is at δ 184 ppm, respectively. 4–15 showed similar resonances for both bridged and axial ligands. Notably, the amino protons of μ2-acetato complex 4 appear at δ 2.90 ppm, lower than the corresponding chemical shift of μ2-arylcarboxylato complexes 8–15. The shielded amino proton of 4 reflects less electron donation to the sawhorse unite, indicating the corresponding axial ligand may be more labile.
Yellow crystals of three diruthenium (I) complexes 8 (Figure 1), 13 and 14 were obtained via the diffusion of petroleum ether to CH2Cl2 solution of the complexes at 0 °C. Single crystal X-ray diffraction was used to analysis confirmed the molecular structures of these complexes, and the selected bond distances and angles are shown in Table 1. The molecular structures feature a typical sawhorse structure that consists of a diruthenium tetracarbonyl core surrounded by two ethylene glycol monomethyl ester glycine esters as axial ligands and two arylcarboxylate ligands at equatorial positions. Three crystals belong to the monoclinic system with the C2/c space group. The Ru-Ru bond distances in these sawhorse skeletons are 2.6694(10) Å (8), 2.6634(7) Å (13) and 2.6727(5) Å (14), respectively; these values are with a metal-metal single bond [27]. The Ru-CO bond length of each terminal carbonyl is slightly different. For instance, the average Ru-CO bond length of these complexes is about 1.83 Å, which is shorter than Ru-CO (1.943(3) Å and 1.903(3) Å) of CO-RM-3 [10], but longer than Ru-CO(1.76 Å) in those of axial triphenylphosphine analogues [27]. In complex 8, Ru(1)-N(1) 2.239(5) Å is slightly more than Ru(2)-N(2) 2.210(5) Å, and the average Ru-Ru-N angle is 158°, indicating the former axial ligand might be more labile and readily dissociate during the CO releasing process. Interesting, in complex 13, Ru(1)-N(1) and Ru(2)-N(2) with same distance at 2.249(4) Å, but Ru(2)-Ru(1)-N(1) = 160.28(11)° bigger than Ru(1)-Ru(2)-N(2) = 159.09(11)°.
The CO release activity of each CO-RM in vivo was measured with the “golden standard” of myoglobin assay. Firstly, sodium dithionite was added to reduce myoglobin to deoxy-myoglobin (deoxyMb) in PBS (pH = 7.4) at 37.8 °C. A stock solution of CO-RM was added and then activated by LED-UV radiation at 365 nm, releasing CO in vivo. The change of deoxyMb to carbonmonoxy-myoglobin (MbCO) was monitored by UV-vis spectroscopy. A typical series of electronic absorption spectra (Figure 2) showed the conversion of deoxyMb to MbCO in the presence of CO released from 4. The half-lives of CO release rate of 4 at 60 µM is 166 s, 40 µM is 172 s, and 20 µM is 267 s. Four isosbestic points demonstrated the biocompatibility of this CO-RM. The dark-controlled CO release experiment showed that all CO-RMs are stable and do not spontaneously degrade under physiological conditions. Tuning the time and density of UV radiation also control the CO releasing kinetics from CO-RM whilst the molecular structures of CO-RMs determine their photo-sensitivity and CO release activity.
To identify the structural features of CO-RMs that govern the CO releasing behaviour, the CO release kinetics of 4–15 were correlated to the corresponding M-CO band and lipophilicity in Table 2. Firstly, the oil-water partition coefficient logP values of complexes were measured by the “flask-shaking” method with n-octanol and water, respectively [28]. The logP value of 4–13 ranges from 0.39 to 1.78. The water-solubility of these sawhorse ruthenium complexes mainly depend on both the axial glycol amino esters and bridging carboxylate, respectively. As shown in Table 2, the more hydrophilic CO-RMs release carbon monoxide faster. 4 exhibited the lowest logP value of 0.39, which release CO fastest and convert 30 μm Mb to MbCO for just 163 s using 60 μm CO-RM. Since the benzyl substitutes of axial ligand significantly reduce the hydrophilicity of 5, The logP value of 5 increased to 1.41 and the CO release half-life of 5 t1/2, 60 μm decreased to 276 s. With the increase in the degree of polymerization of PEG chain, it is conducive to improving the water solubility of CO-RM 5–7, and the CO release rate increases with t1/2, 60 μm from 276 s to 189 s.
The substitutes on the arene are related to the hydrophilicity of aromatic carboxylate bridging CO-RM. 8, 9 and 12 showed higher logP values of 1.71, 1.67 and 1.78, respectively, which released CO much slower with t1/2,60 μm around 1000 s. Interestingly, The para-substituted methyl-, chloro- 10, 11 and meta methoxy- 13 groups increase the hydrophilicity and the corresponding CO rate of each aromatic CO-RM. 14 and 15 are too hydrophobic to be evaluated via the “flask-shaking” method, in which t1/2, 60 μm is over 2000s. Compared with compounds 4, 8–15 with benzyl H atom and polymerization degree n = 1, the structure of acetic acid bridging is better than that of aryl acid bridging. The methyl and methoxy substituents on the benzene ring can improve the water solubility to a certain extent, but the increase in the chain length of bridged alkyl carboxylic acid will significantly reduce the water solubility. Therefore, acetic acid as bridging ligand and hydrophilic PEGlyated ester are essential to improving the water solubility of CO-RM and accelerating the release of CO.
Each component of CO-RM, such as Ru, carboxylic acid and amino acid esters, is considered non-toxic than most of the other CO-RMs. The cytotoxicity of CO-RM is still unknown. To evaluate the bioactivity of PEG-CORM with different functional groups, we investigated the cytotoxicity of 4 and 8 with the murine macrophage cell line, RAW 264.7 and the human colon adenocarcinoma cell line, HT29. Generally, IC50 of 4 over two cell lines showed less cytotoxicity in the dark, in constant with the cellular protection effect of endogenous CO. The MTT experiments showed that 100 µM to 500 µM of 4 significantly impacted the cell viability of RAW264.7 (Figure 3a), IC50 value is 253.3 µM. 100 µM of 4 started to reduce the cell survival rate. As the concentration of CO-RM increased, the survival rate of the cell dropped sharply. In the presence of 400 µM and 500 µM of 4, RAW264.7’s survival rate was 22.3% and 10%, respectively. Due to its limited water-solubility, the MTT experiments of 8 were carried out at 10–50 µM (Figures S17 and S18). 8 showed little effect on RAW264.7 cell viability at a concentration of 10 µM, 99.6%. The survival rate of RAW 264.7 cells decreased slightly with the increase in concentration; 50 µM of 8 decreased to 94.6%, similar to the toxicity of 4.
The human colon adenocarcinoma cell line HT29 received particular interest in studies focused on food digestion and bioavailability due to its ability to express characteristics of mature intestinal cells. To evaluate the potential of PEG-CO-RMs for CO therapy as anticancer agents, we measured the cytotoxicity of 4 and 8 over HT-29. Experiments with HT29 cells used the concentration of 4 in the range from 50 µM to 700 µM (Figure 3b), and 8 in the range of 10–50 µM (Figure S19). At a concentration of 50 µM 4 and 8, 12.5% and 6.65% of the cells lose activity in light stimulation, respectively. Compound 4 showed a better inhibitory effect on cancer cells, indicating that alkyl bridged carboxylic acid ligands with higher toxicity than aryl carboxylic acid ligands. Moreover, when the concentration increased to 700 µM, HT29 cells survived just 24.7%. Interestingly, 4 showed similar anticancer activity in the dark, indicating the anticancer activity of 4 might result from PEG-CO-RM as a whole rather than its’ released CO.

3. Materials and Methods

All manipulations were accomplished with standard Schlenk techniques. Decacarbonyl-ruthenium (Ru3(CO)12) and mPEG amino acid esters were prepared according to literature procedures [27]. CO releasing test were performed using myogblin assay. The cytotoxicity and anticancer activity were measured with RAW264.7 and HTC-29 cells, respectively. The details of experiments were listed in ESI.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the robust sawhorse skeletons of the diruthenium carbonyl complex were devised with PEGylated ligands to tune the CO releasing and bioavailability of CO-RMs. The myoglobin assay test on the CO releasing rate showed well-controlled release kinetics of CO-RMs 4–13 with t1/2, 60 μM from 166 s to 2699 s. The logP values of CO-RMs were correlated with CO release rates, revealing the intrinsic relationship between CO-RMs’ water-solubility and CO releasing activity. The CO-RMs with smaller logP released CO faster, which might prove the concept of enhancing water-solubility to improve the CO release properties. The hydrophilicity of CO-RM was finely tuned via selecting carboxylate bridging ligands and glycol amino acid esters. MTT assay confirmed that CO-RM 4 consisted of acetate and glycol glycine ester less cytotoxic to RAW264.7, but toxic to HT29 cancer cells. These CO releasing and bioactivity experiments demonstrated the PEGylated Sawhorse ruthenium carbonyl complex’s drug-like properties and the promising therapeutic potential.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma15103597/s1, Figures S1 and S2: Molecular structure of complex 13, 14. Tables S1 and S2: Data collection and structural refinements details for single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies of complexes 8, 13 and 14, and selected bond lengths (Å). Figure S3: NMR spectra of complex 4–15. Figure S4: Photo-activated CO release profile for 4–15. Table S3: Stand curve measurement and calculation of logP. Figure S5: UV-vis spectrum showing the Q-bands during different concentrations of 4 (left) and Standard curve of 4 (right). Figure S6: UV-vis spectrum showing the Q-bands during different concentrations of 5 (left) and Standard curve of 5 (right). Figure S7: UV-vis spectrum showing the Q-bands during different concentrations of 6 (left) and Standard curve of 6 (right). Figure S8: UV-vis spectrum showing the Q-bands during different concentrations of 7 (left) and Standard curve of 7 (right). Figure S9: UV-vis spectrum showing the Q-bands during different concentrations of 8 (left) and Standard curve of 8 (right). Figure S10: UV-vis spectrum showing the Q-bands during different concentrations of 9 (left) and Standard curve of 9 (right). Figure S11: UV-vis spectrum showing the Q-bands during different concentrations of 10 (left) and Standard curve of 10 (right). Figure S12: UV-vis spectrum showing the Q-bands during different concentrations of 11 (left) and Standard curve of 11 (right). Figure S13: UV-vis spectrum showing the Q-bands during different concentrations of 12 (left) and Standard curve of 12 (right). Figure S14: UV-vis spectrum showing the Q-bands during different concentrations of 13 (left) and Standard curve of 13 (right). Figure S15: RAW264.7 cell changes inhibited by 4 (dark: a-50 μM; b-500 μM, illumination: c-50μM; d-500 μM). Figure S16: HT29 cell changes inhibited by 4 (dark: a-50 μM; b-500 μM, illumination: c-50μM; d-500 μM). Figure S17: RAW264.7 cell changes inhibited by 8. Figure S18: HT29 cell changes inhibited by 8. Figure S19: Cell viability of RAW264.7 cell and HT29 in presence of 8. References [29,30,31] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.Z.; methodology, X.Z., S.Y., N.G. and W.Z.; writing —original draft preparation, X.Z., N.G. and S.Y.; writing—review and editing, X.Z., N.G., S.Y., H.K. and W.Z.; supervision, W.Z.; project administration, W.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the grant from National Natural Science Foundation of China (21371112), Key Research and Development Project of Shaanxi Science and Technology Department (2017SF-064).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

This work was performed at the Xi’an Key Laboratory of Organometallic Material, Chemistry at Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Motterlini, R.; Otterbein, L.E. Selected Reviews of therapeutic application of CO and CO-RM. The therapeutic potential of carbon monoxide. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 728–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bernardes, G.J.L. Carbon-Monoxide-Releasing Molecules for the Delivery of Therapeutic CO In Vivo. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 9712–9721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ryter, S.W.; Alam, J.; Choi, A.M.K. Heme Oxygenase-1/Carbon Monoxide: From Basic Science to Therapeutic Applications. Physiol. Rev. 2006, 86, 583–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kim, H.J.; Joe, Y.; Yu, J.K.; Chen, Y.; Jeong, S.O.; Mani, N.; Cho, G.J.; Pae, H.; Ryterd, S.W.; Chung, H.T. Carbon monoxide protects against hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury by modulating the miR-34a/SIRT1 pathway. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1852, 1550–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Wei, Y.; Chen, P.; Bruyn, M.; Zhang, W.; Bremer, E.; Helfrich, W. Carbon monoxide-Releasing Molecule-2 (CO-RM-2) attenuates acute hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury in rats. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010, 10, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Caumartin, Y.; Stephen, J.; Deng, J.; Lian, D.; Lan, Z.; Liu, W.; Garcia, B.; Jevnikar, A.M.; Wang, H.; Cepinskas, G.; et al. Carbon monoxide-releasing molecules protect against ischemia-reperfusion injury during kidney transplantation. Kidney Int. 2011, 79, 1080–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kretschmer, R.; Gessner, G.; Görls, H.; Heinemann, S.H.; Westerhausen, M. Dicarbonyl-bis(cysteamine)iron(II): A light induced carbon monoxide releasing molecule based on iron(CO-RM-S1). J. Inorg. Biochem. 2011, 105, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Romanski, S.; Kraus, B.; Schatzschneider, U.; Neudörfl, J.M.; Amslinger, S.; Schmalz, H.G. Acyloxybutadiene Iron Tricarbonyl Complexes as Enzyme-Triggered CO-Releasing Molecules (ET-CO-RMs). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2392–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lomont, J.P.; Nguyen, S.C.; Harris, C.B. Exploring the Utility of Tandem Thermal–Photochemical CO Delivery with CORM-2. Organometallic 2014, 33, 6179–6185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Johnson, T.R.; Mann, B.E.; Teasdale, I.P.; Adams, H.; Foresti, R.; Green, C.J.; Motterlini, R. Metal carbonyls as pharmaceuticals? [Ru(CO)3Cl(glycinate)], a CO-Releasing molecule with an extensive aqueous solution chemistry. Dalton Trans. 2007, 15, 1500–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Seixas, J.D.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Santos-Silva, T.; Otterbein, L.E.; Gallo, D.J.; Rodrigues, S.S.; Guerreiro, B.H.; Gonçalves, A.M.L.; Penacho, N.; Marques, A.R.; et al. Characterization of a versatile organometallic pro-drug (CO-RM) for experimental CO based therapeutics. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 5985–5998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Poh, H.T.; Sim, B.T.; Chwee, T.S.; Leong, W.K.; Fan, W.Y. The Dithiolate-Bridged Diiron Hexacarbonyl Complex Na2[(μ-SCH2CH2COO)Fe(CO)3]2 as a Water-Soluble PhotoCO-RM. Organometallics 2014, 33, 959–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kianfar, E.; Monkowius, U.; Portenkirchner, E.; Knöer, G.; Naturforsch, Z. Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Re(BIAN)(CO)(3)Cl Derivatives Including the First Example of a Water-soluble Tricarbonyl Rhenium(I) Complex with Bis(imino)acenaphthene Ligands. Z. Naturforsch. B 2014, 69, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Mede, R.; Klein, M.; Claus, R.A.; Krieck, S.; Quickert, S.; Görls, H.; Neugebauer, U.; Schmitt, M.; Gessner, G.; Heinemann, S.H.; et al. CO-RM-EDE1: A Highly Water-Soluble and Nontoxic Manganese-Based photoCO-RM with a Biogenic Ligand Sphere. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, W.; Atkin, A.J.; Fairlamb, I.J.S.; Whitwood, A.C.; Lynam, J.M. Synthesis and Reactivity of Molybdenum Complexes Containing Functionalized Alkynyl Ligands: A Photochemically Activated CO-Releasing Molecule (PhotoCO-RM). Organometallics 2011, 30, 4643–4654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Marques, A.R.; Kromer, L.; Bento, I.; Otterbein, L.E.; Blattler, W.A.; Romao, C.C. Generation of Carbon Monoxide Releasing Molecules(CO-RMs) as Drug Can didates for the Treatment of Acute Liver Injury: Targeting of CO-RMs to the Liver. Organometallics 2012, 31, 5810–5822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Crook, S.H.; Mann, B.E.; Meijer, A.J.H.M.; Adams, H.; Sawle, P.; Scapens, D.; Motterlini, R. [Mn(CO)4{S2CNMe(CH2CO2H)}], a new water-soluble CO-releasing molecule. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 4230–4235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pierri, A.E.; Pallaoro, A.; Wu, G.; Ford, P.C. A Luminescent and Biocompatible PhotoCO-RM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 18197–18200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hasegawa, U.; Vlies, A.J.; Simeoni, E.; Wandrey, C.; Hubbell, J.A. Carbon Monoxide-Releasing Micelles for Immunotherapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 18273–18280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pfeiffer, H.; Rojas, A.; Niesel, J.; Schatzschneider, U. Sonogashira and “Click” reactions for the N-terminalandside-chain functionalization of peptides with [Mn(CO)3(tpm)]+-based CO releasing molecules (tpm = tris(pyrazolyl)methane). Dalton Trans. 2009, 22, 4292–4298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zobi, F.; Blacque, O.; Robert, A.; Marcus, J.; Schaubc, C.; Bogdanova, A.Y. 17e− rhenium dicarbonyl CO-releasing molecules on a cobalamin scaffold for biological application. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, P.; Liu, H.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhang, B.; Zheng, Q. Syntheses and evaluation of drug-like properties of CO-releasing molecules containing ruthenium and group 6 metal. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 74, 199–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ringsdorf, H. Structure and properties of pharmacologically active polymers. J. Poly. Sci. 1975, 51, 135–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pasut, G.; Sergi, M.; Veronese, F.M. Anti-cancer PEG-enzymes: 30 Years Old, but Still a Current Approach. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Crooks, G.R.; Johnson, B.F.G.; Lewis, J.; Williams, I.G.; Gamlen, G. Chemistry of polynuclear compounds. Part XVII. Some carboxylate complexes of ruthenium and osmium carbonyls. J. Chem. Soc. A 1969, 2761–2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Therrien, B.; Suss-Fink, G. Sawhorse-type Diruthenium Tetracarbonyl Complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009, 253, 2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Yang, S.; Chen, M.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, G.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, W. Photo-activated CO-releasing Molecules (PhotoCO-RMs) of Robust Sawhorse Scaffolds [µ2-OOCR1,η1-NH2CHR2(C=O]OCH3,Ru(I)2CO4]. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 3727–3733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Glomme, A.; März, J.; Dressman, J.B. Comparison of a Miniaturized Shake-Flask Solubility Method with Automated Potentiometric Acid/Base Titrations and Calculated Solubilities. J. Pharm. Sci. 2005, 94, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. SAINT. Data Reduction Software; Bruker AXS: Madison, WI, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sheldrick, G.M. SADABS, Program for Empirical Absorption Correction of Area Detector Data; University of Gottingen: Gottingen, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. A Complete Structure Solution, Refinement and Analysis Program. J. Appl. Cryst. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 15 03597 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Selected Water-soluble CO-RMs.
Scheme 1. Selected Water-soluble CO-RMs.
Materials 15 03597 sch001
Materials 15 03597 sch002 550
Scheme 2. PEGylating of Sawhorse Ru2(CO)4 complex of 4–15.
Scheme 2. PEGylating of Sawhorse Ru2(CO)4 complex of 4–15.
Materials 15 03597 sch002
Materials 15 03597 g001 550
Figure 1. Molecular structures of 8 (H atoms are omitted for clarity).
Figure 1. Molecular structures of 8 (H atoms are omitted for clarity).
Materials 15 03597 g001
Materials 15 03597 g002 550
Figure 2. Photo-activated CO release profile for 4 (a) UV-vis spectrum showing the Q-bands during the conversion of deoxy-Mb to Mb-CO with time while the concentration of CO-RMs is 60; (b) The CO-releasing kinetics of 4 in which [Mb-CO] was plotted with CO-RM at 60, 40, 20 µM against time.
Figure 2. Photo-activated CO release profile for 4 (a) UV-vis spectrum showing the Q-bands during the conversion of deoxy-Mb to Mb-CO with time while the concentration of CO-RMs is 60; (b) The CO-releasing kinetics of 4 in which [Mb-CO] was plotted with CO-RM at 60, 40, 20 µM against time.
Materials 15 03597 g002
Materials 15 03597 g003 550
Figure 3. Cell viability of RAW264.7 cell (a) and HT29 (b) in presence of 4. Cells were grown in the presence of 4 (50–500 μM) and right in the dark or irradiated at 365 nm for 20 min.
Figure 3. Cell viability of RAW264.7 cell (a) and HT29 (b) in presence of 4. Cells were grown in the presence of 4 (50–500 μM) and right in the dark or irradiated at 365 nm for 20 min.
Materials 15 03597 g003
Table
Table 1. Selected Bond Distances (Å) and Angles (deg) for 8, 13 and 14.
Table 1. Selected Bond Distances (Å) and Angles (deg) for 8, 13 and 14.
EntryRu(1)–Ru(2)Ru(1)–N(1)Ru(2)–N(2)Ru(1)–Ru(2)–N(2)Ru(2)–Ru(1)–N(1)
82.6694(10)2.239(5)2.210(5)157.86(15)158.27(15)
132.6634(7)2.249(4)2.249(4)159.09(11)160.28(11)
142.6727(5)2.233(4)2.240(4)158.27(11)159.84(10)
Table
Table 2. The Correlation of Hydrophilicity and CO releasing kinetics of CO-RM.
Table 2. The Correlation of Hydrophilicity and CO releasing kinetics of CO-RM.
CO-RMlogP a.t1/2, 60 µM b.
40.39166
51.41276
61.17249
71.05189
81.711209
91.67632
101.03962
111.061096
121.781450
131.26966
14N. D.2699
15N. D.2472
Note: [a] Oil-water partition coefficient by UV-vis. [b] CO releasing Kinetics measured with myoglobin assay as t1/2, s.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Guo, N.; Yang, S.; Khan, H.; Zhang, W. Hydrophilic CO-Releasing Material of PEGlyated Ruthenium Carbonyl Complex. Materials 2022, 15, 3597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103597

AMA Style

Zhang X, Guo N, Yang S, Khan H, Zhang W. Hydrophilic CO-Releasing Material of PEGlyated Ruthenium Carbonyl Complex. Materials. 2022; 15(10):3597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103597

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xiao, Nan Guo, Shuhong Yang, Huma Khan, and Weiqiang Zhang. 2022. "Hydrophilic CO-Releasing Material of PEGlyated Ruthenium Carbonyl Complex" Materials 15, no. 10: 3597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103597

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop