Next Article in Journal
Possibilities of a Direct Synthesis of Aluminum Alloys with Elements from Deep-Sea Nodules
Previous Article in Journal
Underwater Repair of Concrete Elements with TRC Grouting System
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 13
10.3390/ma15134471
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rhombohedral Phase Formation in Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Induced by Dental Technical Tools and Its Impact on Dental Applications

by
Markus Wertz
1,*,
Michael Benno Schmidt
1,2,
Hieronymus Hoelzig
3,
Maximilian Wagner
1,4,
Bernd Abel
5,
Gert Kloess
3,
Sebastian Hahnel
1,2 and
Andreas Koenig
1,*
1
Department of Prosthodontics and Material Sciences, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
2
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
3
Institute of Mineralogy, Crystallography and Materials Science, Leipzig University, 04275 Leipzig, Germany
4
Leibniz Institute of Surface Engineering (IOM), Leipzig University, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
5
Wilhelm-Ostwald-Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(13), 4471; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134471
Submission received: 10 May 2022 / Revised: 16 June 2022 / Accepted: 23 June 2022 / Published: 24 June 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the study the influence of different dental technical tools on the surface temperature and phase composition of fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) made of yttria-partially stabilized zirconia polycrystals (3Y-/4Y-/5Y-PSZ) was investigated. FDPs were fabricated by using computer-aided manufacturing (CAM). The FDPs were treated with a contra-angle handpiece equipped with different burs and polishers. The resulting surface temperatures were measured with a thermographic camera, and the resulting phase transformations were investigated by X-ray diffraction and quantified by Rietveld refinement. Processing with burs resulted in no phase transformation, but a preferred orientation shift. Using coarse polisher induced a phase transformation to the rhombohedral phase, while fine polishers produced no relevant phase transformations and no preferred orientation shift. Compared to the monoclinic phase (ca. 9% theoretical volume increase), which is associated with low-temperature degradation (LTD), the rhombohedral phase is much more voluminous (ca. 15% theoretical volume increase) and distorted and, therefore, has a greater degradation potential.

1. Introduction

In recent years, tooth-coloured materials such as ceramics and resin composites have become very popular for application in monolithic aesthetic dental restorations [1,2,3,4,5]. As yttria-partly stabilized zirconia (Y-PSZ), compared to other dental materials, features outstanding mechanical performance [6] (flexural strength between 750 and 1300 MPa [7,8]) and its optical properties such as translucency [9] are almost similar to enamel. The material is biologically inert [8], has a high X-ray opacity, AND can be used for a broad variety of dental restorations, including fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), primary telescopic crowns, dental implants, and implant superstructures [4,5]. The survival rates are very high and similar to metal alloys [10]. They ranged for zirconia implants from about 76% (first generation [11]) to 95% after one to seven years [12], for fixed complete dentures (FCDs) 100% after one to seven years [5]), and for frameworks 100% after ten years [13].
The translucency of Y-PSZ increases with a reduction in the grain size of the pressed powder, the porosity, and the aluminium content, and with an increase in the yttria content [14]. For the question of indication, the yttrium oxide content in particular has proven to be a decisive material parameter, as it can be used to control the phase composition and thus, above all the optical and mechanical properties.
In general, Y-PSZ consists of a mixture of cubic (C; spacegroup Fm 3 ¯ m) and tetragonal (T, T′, and T′′; spacegroup P42/nmc) high-temperature phases, which are metastable at room temperature [15,16,17]. There are also several tetragonal phases T, T, and T′′ [16,17], two orthorhombic high-pressure phases (O and O’; Pbca and Pnam), and a monoclinic phase (M; spacegroup P21/c), which is the only stable phase under standard conditions [15,16,17].
When subjected to thermal [18,19,20] or mechanical [21,22,23] stress, Y-PSZ may undergo a slow tetragonal (T) to monoclinic (M) transformation [24,25,26,27] under certain conditions, which is fostered by humidity [18,21].
Because of the resulting local volume expansion and the optical biaxiality, this aging phenomena (low temperature degradation; LTD) degrades the physical and optical properties of zirconia severely [15,18,19,21,28,29].
During cooling after sintering, the initially present tetragonal phase T′ separates into yttria-rich (C, T′′) and yttria-lean (M, T) phases [16,17,30]. Because of the low yttria solubility of the monoclinic phase, only the yttria-lean tetragonal phase T transforms in the monoclinic phase M, while the yttria-rich tetragonal phase T′′ and the cubic phase C are not transformable and, therefore, not subjected to low-temperature degradation [18,29].
Under mechanical loading (alumina particle blasting and grinding in the lab), the formation of a rhombohedral/trigonal phase (R; R 3 ¯ ) was observed [31,32,33,34]. This phase is a hettotype of the cubic phase (spacegroup Fm 3 ¯ m → spacegroup R 3 ¯ ). It retains only the trigonal symmetry element 3 ¯ and features–compared to the cubic phase–a highly distorted elementary cell [33,35,36].
Prosthetic treatments include the examination of aesthetic and functional parameters such as the marginal fit between crown and tooth, proximal contact, and static and dynamic occlusion [37]. In many cases, occlusal adjustments are necessary, as interferences in the occlusion may cause problems with teeth and the temporomandibular joint, which may ultimately impair quality of life [38]. Occlusal adjustments are commonly performed with fine diamond burs, which are followed by a polishing regime. Adequate polishing is particularly relevant in restorations fabricated from zirconia, as insufficiently polished zirconia surfaces may cause increased abrasion in antagonistic natural tooth tissues [39,40].
It is well known that mechanical loading [8,32,41,42,43,44,45] of zirconia, e.g., as induced by polishing or grinding, may—under certain conditions—lead to a phase transformation. Song et al. [46] defined four different types of stresses that are applied on Y-PSZs during abrasion with a diamond bur and quantified them using finite element analysis (FEA). The various stress types include tensile (max. 904 MPa), shear (max. 588 MPa), compressive (max. 878 MPa), and theoretical von Mises (max. 885 MPa to 1974 MPa) stress [46]. Some of these stresses exceed the flexural strength of zirconia (cf. Table 1).
The study examined the influence of commonly used diamond burs and polishing equipment on the phase composition of fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated from 3Y-, 4Y-, and 5Y-PSZs. The boundary conditions necessary for the phase transformation (temperature distribution, mechanical effects) were determined experimentally. The results were compared to know phase transformation driven phenomena such as LTD.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Sample Preparation

Six FDPs fabricated from Y-PSZs with different yttria contents supplied either by Dental Direkt (Dental Direkt GmbH, DE-32139 Sprenge; DD) or VITA Zahnfabrik (Vita Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG, DE-79704 Bad Säckingen; VT) were used (Table 1). The FDPs were produced using computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) techniques in accordance with the instructions issued by manufacturers employing an inLab MC X5 (Dentsply Sitrona Deutschland GmbH, DE-64625 Bensheim) 5-axis milling machine and the CAD software Ceramill Mind 2.4 7437 (Amann Girrbach AG, AT-6842 Koblach) (cf. [47]).
Table
Table 1. Overview of the Y-PSZs from two manufacturers used for producing FDPs.
Table 1. Overview of the Y-PSZs from two manufacturers used for producing FDPs.
AbbreviationProductLOTYttria Content
mol % 1		Flexural Strength
MPa 1
3Y_VTVITA YZ HT83,29031100
3Y_DDDD Bio ZX25,032,106,00231250
4Y_VTVITA YZ ST65,8904>850
4Y_DDDD cube ONE7,162,042,0014>1250
5Y_VTVITA YZ XT61,9625>600
5Y_DDDD cubeX28,032,028,0025800
1 According to the manufacturer.
The FDPs were processed from pre-sintered round discs (Ø 98.5 mm). For investigations, a premolar crown from the upper jaw (wall thickness: buccal/palatinal: 2.45 mm; mesial: 0.66 mm; distal: 0.69 mm) was manufactured. To simplify the X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements, the FDPs featured flat occlusal surfaces without cusps. Sintering was conducted according to the instructions of the manufacturers at 1450 °C (3Y- and 5Y-PSZ) and 1530 °C (4Y-PSZ) using a zirconia sintering furnace (VITA Zyrcomat 6000 MS, Vita Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) (cf. [47]). For glace firing, glaze paste was prepared from VITA Akzent plus Glaze LT and VITA plus powder fluid. Heating was performed according to the instructions of the manufacturer with a vacuum furnace (VITA Vacumat 6000 M, Vita Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG, DE-79704 Bad Säckingen, Germany) (cf. [47] Table 2).
To simulate dental adjustments in occlusion, coarse (842KR) and fine (8837KR) diamond burs (both from Komet Dental, Lemgo, Germany) were used with an EXPERTtorque Mini LUX E677 L contra-angle handpiece (KaVo, Biberach an der Riß, Deutschland). Subsequently, polishing was simulated using typical coarse (Cera Glaze P3032A) and fine (Cera Glaze P30032A) polishers (both by NTI, Khala, Germany) (Table 3).

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Mechanical Loading

The manual mechanical vertical load, which was applied to the bur/polisher while processing was analysed using a universal testing machine (Retro line, ZwickRoell, Ulm, Germany). The force was applied directly on the measurement spot (Table 3).

2.2.2. Thermographic Analysis

Processing with the burs and polishers was filmed using an MWIR A6700-InSb thermal imaging camera (Teledyne FLIR LLC, Wilsonville, Oregon, USA) with a thermal sensitivity of <18 mK. The dataset was analysed using ResearchIR 4.40.11 software (Teledyne FLIR LLC, Wilsonville, Oregon). The temperatures on the crowns were measured directly after removing the bur from the surface. For each measurement, two temperature ranges (77.4–216 and 146.6–323.6 °C for the burs and 20–98.1 °C and 146.6–216 °C for the polishers) were applied.

2.2.3. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

The phase composition (Figure 1) was analysed using a D8 Discover (Bruker AXS Advanced X-ray Solutions GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) X-ray diffractometer with a VÅNTEC-500 (Vantec Thermal Technologies, Fremont, CA, USA) area detector. CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) and X-ray settings of 40 kV and 40 mA were used. For gathering data, the measurement setup described by Wertz et al. [47] was applied. The integration was carried out with the software DIFFRAC.EVA (Version 3.1; Bruker AXS Advanced X-ray Solutions GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany).

2.2.4. Rietveld Refinement

TOPAS 4.2 software (Bruker AXS Advanced X-ray Solutions GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) was used for Rietveld refinement. Structural data were derived from the literature [31,48,49] and adapted with data from various publications [15,16,17,41,50]. The XRD curve calculated includes structural models for the monoclinic (M), tetragonal (T, T′′), cubic (C), and rhombohedral/trigonal (R) [47].
Important reflections at ~35°, ~60°, and ~74° in 2Θ (Figure 2a–c) were used for differentiating the tetragonal phase T from the tetragonal phase T′′ and the cubic phase C.
With increasing Yttria content, the tetragonal phase fraction T′′ increases at the expense of the tetragonal phase T. The corresponding reflections are a) 0 0 2T/T′′, 1 1 0 T/T′′ and 0 0 2C; b) 0 1 3T/T′′, 2 1 1 T/T′′ & 3 1 1C, and c) 0 0 4T/T′′, 2 2 0 T/T′′, and 0 0 4C.
The increasing surface roughness induced by treatment with dental technical tools was compensated with a surface roughness correction [51]. Texture effects were refined using a preferred orientation approach according to March—Dollase [52,53]. The resulting refinement was improved using optical and numerical parameters in an iterative process. Diamond 4 software (Version 4.6.5, Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany) was used to display the phases and to determine parameters such as the number of atoms per unit cell.

3. Results

In general, identical phase compositions were found between the manufacturers for the processing steps and the different yttria contents. Therefore, only changes which were detected for both manufactures are presented in detail in the sections. The phase composition of all measurements after Rietveld refinement are deposited in the Appendix A (Table A1, Table A2, Table A3, Table A4, Table A5 and Table A6).

3.1. Coarse and Fine Diamond Burs

The usage of all coarse and fine diamond burs induced no phase transformation, but a preferred orientation shift from 1 1 0T/T′′ to 0 0 1T/T′′.
Figure 3 displays the diffractograms prior (a) and after (b) treatment with a coarse diamond bur. The main phases are the tetragonal phases T and T′′.
The reflections at 35°, 60°, and 74° in 2Θ show a strengthening of 0 0 2T/T′′ (36°; left reflection), 0 1 3T/T′′ (60°; left reflection), and 0 0 4T/T′′ (60°; left reflection) for 1 1 0T/T′′ (34°; right reflection), 2 1 1T/T′′ (58°; right reflection), and 2 2 0T/T′′ (60°; right reflection).
A detailed look on certain areas (Figure 4) shows no substantial phase transformation (c.f. Table A1, Table A2, Table A3, Table A4, Table A5 and Table A6), so the scattering intensity shifts suggest a 0 0 1T/T′′ texture (preferred orientation in the grain) induced by the treatment with all coarse and fine burs.
Processing with a coarse bur changes the ratio between 0 0 1 (left) and 1 1 0 (right) (preferred orientation change). The corresponding reflections are (a) 0 0 2T/T′′ (left), 1 1 0 T/T′′ (right), and 0 0 2C; (b) 0 1 3T/T′′ (left), 2 1 1 T/T′′ (right), and 3 1 1C; (c) 0 0 4T/T′′ (left), 2 2 0 T/T′′ (right), and 0 0 4C.
Figure 5 depicts the temperature distribution of the coarse and fine burs during application. Both treatments produced very similar temperatures in the area of the surface contact point.
Comparing the temperature profile induced by treatment with the coarse and fine (Table 4) diamond burs, it is obvious that both treatments produced similarly high temperatures on the surfaces.

3.2. Coarse and Fine Polisher

When coarse polishers (Figure 6) were applied on all samples listed in Table 1, substantial formation of a rhombohedral (trigonal R) phase was induced. The fine polisher induced no relevant phase transformation (c.f. Table A1, Table A2, Table A3, Table A4, Table A5 and Table A6).
Figure 7 shows the detailed indication of some rhombohedral reflections (R) exemplarily.
The thermograms (Figure 8) gathered during treatments with coarse and fine polishers showed large temperature differences between the two treatments.
The temperatures observed on the surface of the FDPs and polishers were much higher during treatment with the coarse polisher than with the fine polisher (Table 5).

4. Discussion

Following the arguments of Wertz et al. [47], we have used a phase model for Rietveld refinement, which includes the two tetragonal phases T and T′′ as well as cubic phase C, monoclinic phase M, and trigonal/rhombohedral phase R. In regard to the tetragonal phases, the authors showed that including both phases substantially improves the refinement.

4.1. Coarse and Fine Diamond Burs

The usage of diamond burs leads to a preferred orientation shift, but no phase transformation. In the current study, the fine polisher induced no such preferred orientation shift, probably because of its finer surface structure.
Since one stability mechanism in tetragonal zirconia includes a layered structure with strong (2.09–2.10 Å) Zr-O1 bonds within and weak (2.33–2.35 Å) Zr-O2 bonds between the layers [26,54], a preferred orientation shift (Figure 3 and Figure 4) through coarse or fine diamond burs may change this layered structure (Figure 9).

4.2. Coarse and Fine Polisher

The coarse polisher induced the formation of a rhombohedral phase (R). Because of its metastability, the rhombohedral phase of zirconia has only rarely been reported. While it has been discussed [31,32,47,55] in other studies [20,56], typical reflections for the rhombohedral phase (R) were measured but not discussed.
The elementary cell (Table 6 and Figure 10) of the rhombohedral phase (R) features a 15% higher volume per atom ratio than the cubic (C) and tetragonal phases (T, T′′) and a shear of 30° (cf. monoclinic elementary cell: 4–5% [15] to 9% higher; 9° shear [15]). Additionally, in the rhombohedral phase, every zirconium atom is bonded with only six oxygen atoms instead of eight atoms, as in the cubic and tetragonal phases (monoclinic phase: seven O- bondings per Zr- atom).
When the FDP is heated after polishing in dental practice (e.g., for glace firing), a retransformation from the rhombohedral to the tetragonal phase would be possible, which may cause shrinkage and microstrain formation.
These effects may be stronger than the effects of the LTD-related monoclinic phase transformation because of the stronger distortion (Table 6), the higher volume expansion, and the larger shear of the rhombohedral phase.
Kitano et al. [31] indicated that a rhombohedral to monoclinic phase transformation may also be operative. Therefore, the rhombohedral phase may also be subjected to processes such as low-temperature degradation (LTD) and potentially promote them.
Only treatment with the coarse polisher resulted in the formation of the rhombohedral phase. Subsequent firing (e.g., glace firing or regeneration firing) could retransform the rhombohedral phase into a tetragonal or cubic phase, which may cause additional stresses by shrinkage phenomena. The different results can be explained by the higher temperatures induced by treatment with the coarse polisher (Table 5) and the entry of shear forces [46,57].
The current study is limited by the low thickness of the surface, which can be analysed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), the harsh loading conditions, and the limited number of dental technical tools (Table 3) we used. Therefore, the practical consequences on this the laboratory study must determine in further investigations.

5. Conclusions

Our experiments within the limitations of the study show some conditions of the formation of a rhombohedral phase fraction (15–30%) of 3/4/5Y-PSZ through polishing with dental handpieces.
  • Polishing with coarse polishers can induce a partial rhombohedral phase transformation.
  • All diamond burs used induce a break up of the layer structure of Y-PSZ and a subsequent preferred orientation shift to 0 0 1 T/T′′ at the expense of 1 1 0 T/T′′, but no phase transformation.
  • Treatment with fine polishers did not induce any relevant phase transformation.
Similar to the tetragonal to monoclinic phase transformation, the rhombohedral phase transformation induced a volume expansion (15% higher volume per atom ratio than the cubic or tetragonal phases) and shear (30°). Since only the coarse polisher induced this phase transformation, this indicates a metastable phase stability field, in which this phase transformation occurs.
Further studies should address the conditions and prevention of the formation of the rhombohedral phase, especially the combination of different polishers in practically used polishing sets. It is necessary to clarify the practical impact of the above observations on the material properties (mechanical and optical) and clinical performance of FDPs fabricated from Y-PSZs. Additionally, the stability of the rhombohedral phase against subsequent firings and low-temperature degradation should be investigated.

Author Contributions

M.W. (Markus Wertz): Conceptualization, software, investigation, methodology, formal analysis, data curation, validation, writing—original draft preparation; M.B.S.: Investigation; H.H.: Investigation, writing—review and editing; M.W. (Maximilian Wagner): Investigation, writing—review and editing; B.A.: Resources; G.K.: Resources; S.H.: Writing—review and editing, supervision; A.K.: Conceptualization, Visualization, resources, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support from Leipzig University for Open Access Publishing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Quantification of the phase content of the FDPs fabricated from 3Y_VT. VT: Vita Zahnfabrik.
Table A1. Quantification of the phase content of the FDPs fabricated from 3Y_VT. VT: Vita Zahnfabrik.
3Y_VTMRTT′′C
3Y_VT_1 (as sintered)0082711
3Y_VT_2 (coarse bur)00642212
3Y_VT_3 (fine bur)00602911
3Y_VT_4 (coarse polisher)030391615
3Y_VT_5 (fine polisher)0074818
Table
Table A2. Quantification of the phase content of the FDPs fabricated from 3Y_DD. DD: Dental Direct.
Table A2. Quantification of the phase content of the FDPs fabricated from 3Y_DD. DD: Dental Direct.
3Y_DDMRTT′′C
3Y_DD_1 (as sintered)0080812
3Y_DD_2 (coarse bur)00671716
3Y_DD_3 (fine bur)00692011
3Y_DD_4 (coarse polisher)01468144
3Y_DD_5 (fine polisher)008479
Table
Table A3. Quantification of the phase content of the FDPs fabricated from 4Y_VT. VT: Vita Zahnfabrik.
Table A3. Quantification of the phase content of the FDPs fabricated from 4Y_VT. VT: Vita Zahnfabrik.
4Y_VTMRTT′′C
4Y_VT_1 (as sintered)00602119
4Y_VT_2 (coarse bur)00443917
4Y_VT_3 (fine bur)00424712
4Y_VT_4 (coarse polisher)030253411
4Y_VT_5 (fine polisher)00542719
Table
Table A4. Quantification of the phase content of the FDPs fabricated from 4Y_DD. DD: Dental Direct.
Table A4. Quantification of the phase content of the FDPs fabricated from 4Y_DD. DD: Dental Direct.
4Y_DDMRTT′′C
4Y_DD_1 (as sintered)00602416
4Y_DD_2 (coarse bur)00533215
4Y_DD_3 (fine bur)00523711
4Y_DD_4 (coarse polisher)01853236
4Y_DD_5 (fine polisher)00602911
Table
Table A5. Quantification of the phase content of the FDPs fabricated from 5Y_VT. VT: Vita Zahnfabrik.
Table A5. Quantification of the phase content of the FDPs fabricated from 5Y_VT. VT: Vita Zahnfabrik.
5Y_VTMRTT′′C
5Y_VT_1 (as sintered)00246412
5Y_VT_2 (coarse bur)00285616
5Y_VT_3 (fine bur)00305911
5Y_VT_4 (coarse polisher)01518625
5Y_VT_5 (fine polisher)00285715
Table
Table A6. Quantification of the phase content of the FDPs fabricated from 5Y_DD. DD: Dental Direct.
Table A6. Quantification of the phase content of the FDPs fabricated from 5Y_DD. DD: Dental Direct.
5Y_DDMRTT′′C
5Y_DD_1 (as sintered)00246610
5Y_DD_2 (coarse bur)00235720
5Y_DD_3 (fine bur)00226117
5Y_DD_4 (coarse polisher)01815607
5Y_DD_5 (fine polisher)00266311

References

  1. Rauch, A.; Schrock, A.; Schierz, O.; Hahnel, S. Material preferences for tooth-supported 3-unit fixed dental prostheses: A survey of German dentists. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2021, 126, 91.e1–91.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rauch, A.; Schrock, A.; Schierz, O.; Hahnel, S. Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns-a survey among dentists in Germany. Clin. Oral Investig. 2021, 25, 283–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, F.; Inokoshi, M.; Batuk, M.; Hadermann, J.; Naert, I.; van Meerbeek, B.; Vleugels, J. Strength, toughness and aging stability of highly-translucent Y-TZP ceramics for dental restorations. Dent. Mater. 2016, 32, e327–e337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rosentritt, M.; Preis, V.; Behr, M.; Strasser, T. Fatigue and wear behaviour of zirconia materials. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2020, 110, 103970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cappare, P.; Ferrini, F.; Mariani, G.; Nagni, M.; Cattoni, F. Implant rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with predominantly monolithic zirconia compared to metal-acrylic prostheses: A 2-year retrospective clinical study. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2021, 35, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Garvie, R.C. Ceramic steel? Nature 1975, 258, 703–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, Y.; Lawn, B.R. Novel Zirconia Materials in Dentistry. J. Dent. Res. 2018, 97, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kelly, J.R.; Denry, I. Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: An overview. Dent. Mater. 2008, 24, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pecho, O.E.; Ghinea, R.; Ionescu, A.M.; La Cardona, J.D.C.; Paravina, R.D.; Pérez, M.D.M. Color and translucency of zirconia ceramics, human dentine and bovine dentine. J. Dent. 2012, 40 (Suppl. 2), e34–e40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Roehling, S.; Schlegel, K.A.; Woelfler, H.; Gahlert, M. Zirconia compared to titanium dental implants in preclinical studies-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2019, 30, 365–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Roehling, S.; Woelfler, H.; Hicklin, S.; Kniha, H.; Gahlert, M. A Retrospective Clinical Study with Regard to Survival and Success Rates of Zirconia Implants up to and after 7 Years of Loading. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2016, 18, 545–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Haro Adánez, M.; Nishihara, H.; Att, W. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical outcome of zirconia implant-restoration complex. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2018, 62, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Passia, N.; Chaar, M.S.; Kern, M. Outcome of posterior fixed dental prostheses made from veneered zirconia over an observation period of up to 13 years. J. Dent. 2019, 86, 126–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Klimke, J.; Trunec, M.; Krell, A. Transparent Tetragonal Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Ceramics: Influence of Scattering Caused by Birefringence. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 94, 1850–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kisi, E.H.; Howard, C.J. Crystal Structures of Zirconia Phases and their Inter-Relation. Key Eng. Mater. 1998, 153–154, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lipkin, D.M.; Krogstad, J.A.; Gao, Y.; Johnson, C.A.; Nelson, W.A.; Levi, C.G. Phase Evolution upon Aging of Air-Plasma Sprayed t ′-Zirconia Coatings: I-Synchrotron X-ray Diffraction. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2013, 96, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Krogstad, J.A.; Gao, Y.; Bai, J.; Wang, J.; Lipkin, D.M.; Levi, C.G. In Situ Diffraction Study of the High-Temperature Decomposition of t′ -Zirconia. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 98, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Keuper, M.; Berthold, C.; Nickel, K.G. Long-time aging in 3 mol.% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals at human body temperature. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 951–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lughi, V.; Sergo, V. Low temperature degradation -aging- of zirconia: A critical review of the relevant aspects in dentistry. Dent. Mater. 2010, 26, 807–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shen, J.; Xie, H.; Wu, X.; Yang, J.; Liao, M.; Chen, C. Evaluation of the effect of low-temperature degradation on the translucency and mechanical properties of ultra-transparent 5Y-TZP ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 553–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tholey, M.J.; Berthold, C.; Swain, M.V.; Thiel, N. XRD2 micro-diffraction analysis of the interface between Y-TZP and veneering porcelain: Role of application methods. Dent. Mater. 2010, 26, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Vila-Nova, G.D.C. Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and low temperature degradation on the surface topography, phase transformation and flexural strength of ultra-translucent ZrO2 ceramic. Dent. Mater. 2020, 36, e126–e139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Edalati, K.; Toh, S.; Ikoma, Y.; Horita, Z. Plastic deformation and allotropic phase transformations in zirconia ceramics during high-pressure torsion. Scr. Mater. 2011, 65, 974–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Weber, B.C. Observations on the Stabilization of Zirconia. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1956, 56, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fabris, S. A stabilization mechanism of zirconia based on oxygen vacancies only. Acta Mater. 2002, 50, 5171–5178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Li, P.; Chen, I.W.; Penner-Hahn, J.E. Effect of Dopants on Zirconia Stabilization—An X-ray Absorption Study: II, Tetravalent Dopants. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1994, 5, 1281–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Howard, C.J.; Hill, R.J. The polymorphs of zirconia: Phase abundance and crystal structure by Rietveld analysis of neutron and X-ray diffraction data. J. Mater. Sci. 1991, 82, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chevalier, J.; Cales, B.; Drouin, J.M. Low-Temperature Aging of Y-TZP Ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 9, 2150–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Keuper, M.; Eder, K.; Berthold, C.; Nickel, K.G. Direct evidence for continuous linear kinetics in the low-temperature degradation of Y-TZP. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9, 4826–4835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Krogstad, J.A.; Leckie, R.M.; Krämer, S.; Cairney, J.M.; Lipkin, D.M.; Johnson, C.A.; Levi, C.G. Phase Evolution upon Aging of Air Plasma Sprayed t′-Zirconia Coatings: II-Microstructure Evolution. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2013, 96, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kitano, Y.; Mori, Y.; Ishitani, A.; Masaki, T. Rhombohedral Phase in Y2O3-Partially-Stabilized ZrO2. J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 1988, 1, C34–C36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kim, D.-J.; Jung, H.-J.; Kim, H.-J. t → r phase transformation of tetragonal zirconia alloys by grinding. Mat. Sci. Lett. 1995, 14, 285–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yoshida, K. Influence of alumina air-abrasion for highly translucent partially stabilized zirconia on flexural strength, surface properties, and bond strength of resin cement. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2020, 28, e20190371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Inokoshi, M.; Shimizu, H.; Nozaki, K.; Takagaki, T.; Yoshihara, K.; Nagaoka, N.; Zhang, F.; Vleugels, J.; van Meerbeek, B.; Minakuchi, S. Crystallographic and morphological analysis of sandblasted highly translucent dental zirconia. Dent. Mater. 2018, 34, 508–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ruiz, L.; Readey, M.J. Effect of Heat Treatment on Grain Size, Phase Assemblage, and Mechanical Properties of 3 mol% Y-TZP. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1996, 9, 2331–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hasegawa, H.; Hioki, T.; Kamigaito, O. Cubic-to-rhombohedral phase transformation in zirconia by ion implantation. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 1985, 4, 1092–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sailer, I.; Makarov, N.A.; Thoma, D.S.; Zwahlen, M.; Pjetursson, B.E. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent. Mater. 2015, 31, 603–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Dimberg, L.; Arnrup, K.; Bondemark, L. The impact of malocclusion on the quality of life among children and adolescents: A systematic review of quantitative studies. Eur. J. Orthod. 2015, 37, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Miyazaki, T.; Nakamura, T.; Matsumura, H.; Ban, S.; Kobayashi, T. Current status of zirconia restoration. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2013, 57, 236–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Zhang, F.; Spies, B.C.; Vleugels, J.; Reveron, H.; Wesemann, C.; Müller, W.-D.; van Meerbeek, B.; Chevalier, J. High-translucent yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics are wear-resistant and antagonist-friendly. Dent. Mater. 2019, 35, 1776–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wertz, M.; Fuchs, F.; Hoelzig, H.; Wertz, J.M.; Kloess, G.; Hahnel, S.; Rosentritt, M.; Koenig, A. The Influence of Surface Preparation, Chewing Simulation, and Thermal Cycling on the Phase Composition of Dental Zirconia. Materials 2021, 14, 2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Block, S. Pressure-Temperature Phase Diagram of Zirconia. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1985, 9, 497–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ohtaka, O. Stability of Monoclinic and Orthorhombic Zirconia: Studies by High-Pressure Phase Equilibria and Calorimetry. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1991, 3, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shukla, S.; Seal, S. Mechanisms of room temperature metastable tetragonal phase stabilisation in zirconia. Int. Mater. Rev. 2005, 50, 45–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ban, S. Chemical durability of high translucent dental zirconia. Dent. Mater. J. 2020, 39, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Song, X.-F.; Yin, L.; Han, Y.-G.; Li, J. Finite element analysis of subsurface damage of ceramic prostheses in simulated intraoral dental resurfacing. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2008, 85, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wertz, M.; Hoelzig, H.; Kloess, G.; Hahnel, S.; Koenig, A. Influence of Manufacturing Regimes on the Phase Transformation of Dental Zirconia. Materials 2021, 14, 4980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lamas, D.G.; Walsöe de Reca, N.E. X-ray diffraction study of compositionally homogeneous, nanocrystalline yttria-doped zirconia powders. J. Mat. Sci. 2000, 691, 5563–5567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xie, R.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, X. Insights into the structural, microstructural and physical properties of multiphase powder mixtures. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 691, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yashima, M.; Sasaki, S.; Kakihana, M.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Arashi, H.; Yoshimura, M. Oxygen-induced structural change of the tetragonal phase around the tetragonal–cubic phase boundary in ZrO2–YO 1.5 solid solutions. Acta Cryst. B Struct. Sci. 1995, 51, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pitschke, W.; Hermann, H.; Mattern, N. The influence of surface roughness on diffracted X-ray intensities in Bragg–Brentano geometry and its effect on the structure determination by means of Rietveld analysis. Powder Diffr. 1993, 8, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dollase, W.A. Correction of intensities for preferred orientation in powder diffractometry: Application of the March model. J. Appl. Cryst. 1986, 19, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. March, A. Mathematische Theorie der Regelung nach der Korngestah bei affiner Deformation. Z. Krist. 1932, 81, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, P.; Chen, I.-W.; Penner-Hahn, J. Effect of Dopants on Zirconia Stabilization—An X-ray Absorption Study: I, Trivalent Dopants. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1994, 77, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Denry, I.L.; Holloway, J.A. Microstructural and crystallographic surface changes after grinding zirconia-based dental ceramics. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2006, 76, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Botelho, M.G.; Dangay, S.; Shih, K.; Lam, W.Y.H. The effect of surface treatments on dental zirconia: An analysis of biaxial flexural strength, surface roughness and phase transformation. J. Dent. 2018, 75, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Song, X.-F.; Yin, L.; Han, Y.-G.; Wang, H. In vitro rapid intraoral adjustment of porcelain prostheses using a high-speed dental handpiece. Acta Biomater. 2008, 4, 414–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 15 04471 g001 550
Figure 1. Depiction of the reference FDPs fabricated from 3Y-VT_1, 4Y-VT_1, and 5Y-VT_1.
Figure 1. Depiction of the reference FDPs fabricated from 3Y-VT_1, 4Y-VT_1, and 5Y-VT_1.
Materials 15 04471 g001
Materials 15 04471 g002 550
Figure 2. Comparison of the observed curves of the reference FDPs fabricated from 3Y_VT_1 (red) and 5Y_VT_1 (black) around 35° (a), 60° (b), and 74° (c) in 2Θ (from Figure 1) with their phase composition (T, T′´, C).
Figure 2. Comparison of the observed curves of the reference FDPs fabricated from 3Y_VT_1 (red) and 5Y_VT_1 (black) around 35° (a), 60° (b), and 74° (c) in 2Θ (from Figure 1) with their phase composition (T, T′´, C).
Materials 15 04471 g002
Materials 15 04471 g003 550
Figure 3. Observed (Yobs) and calculated (Ycalc) curves of FDPs 3Y_DD_1 (above; sintered FDP) and 3Y_DD_2 (below; coarse diamond bur) and the curves of the calculated phase fractions.
Figure 3. Observed (Yobs) and calculated (Ycalc) curves of FDPs 3Y_DD_1 (above; sintered FDP) and 3Y_DD_2 (below; coarse diamond bur) and the curves of the calculated phase fractions.
Materials 15 04471 g003
Materials 15 04471 g004 550
Figure 4. Comparison of the observed curves of the FDPs fabricated from 3Y_DD_1 (sintered, black) and 3Y_DD_2 (coarse diamond bur, red) around 35° (a), 60° (b), and 74° (c) in 2Θ (highlighted parts of Figure 3) with their phase composition (T, T´´, C).
Figure 4. Comparison of the observed curves of the FDPs fabricated from 3Y_DD_1 (sintered, black) and 3Y_DD_2 (coarse diamond bur, red) around 35° (a), 60° (b), and 74° (c) in 2Θ (highlighted parts of Figure 3) with their phase composition (T, T´´, C).
Materials 15 04471 g004
Materials 15 04471 g005 550
Figure 5. Thermograms of FDP surfaces processed with coarse (left, middle-left) and fine (right, middle-right) diamond burs. For each measurement two temperature ranges (77.4–216 and 146.6–323.6 °C) were applied.
Figure 5. Thermograms of FDP surfaces processed with coarse (left, middle-left) and fine (right, middle-right) diamond burs. For each measurement two temperature ranges (77.4–216 and 146.6–323.6 °C) were applied.
Materials 15 04471 g005
Materials 15 04471 g006 550
Figure 6. Observed (Yobs) and calculated (Ycalc) curves for FDPs fabricated from 5Y_DD_4 (above; coarse polisher) and 5Y_DD_5 (below; fine polisher) and the curves of the calculated phase fractions.
Figure 6. Observed (Yobs) and calculated (Ycalc) curves for FDPs fabricated from 5Y_DD_4 (above; coarse polisher) and 5Y_DD_5 (below; fine polisher) and the curves of the calculated phase fractions.
Materials 15 04471 g006
Materials 15 04471 g007 550
Figure 7. Comparison of the observed curves of the FDPs fabricated from 3Y_DD_4 (sintered, fine polisher; red) and 3Y_DD_5 (sintered, fine polisher; black) around 30° (a) and 50° (b) in 2Θ (highlighted parts of Figure 6).
Figure 7. Comparison of the observed curves of the FDPs fabricated from 3Y_DD_4 (sintered, fine polisher; red) and 3Y_DD_5 (sintered, fine polisher; black) around 30° (a) and 50° (b) in 2Θ (highlighted parts of Figure 6).
Materials 15 04471 g007
Materials 15 04471 g008 550
Figure 8. Thermograms of FDP surfaces processed with coarse (left, middle-left) and fine (right, middle-right) diamond burs. For each measurement two temperature ranges (20–98.1 and 146.6–216 °C) were applied.
Figure 8. Thermograms of FDP surfaces processed with coarse (left, middle-left) and fine (right, middle-right) diamond burs. For each measurement two temperature ranges (20–98.1 and 146.6–216 °C) were applied.
Materials 15 04471 g008
Materials 15 04471 g009 550
Figure 9. Schematic idealized illustration of grains with a preferred orientation of crystal structure and their impact on a diffractogram. The initially randomly oriented grains (left) are oriented towards 0 0 1T/T′′ (right). Since parts of the grains still have a preferred orientation towards 1 1 0T/T′′, a 1 1 0T/T′′ reflection remains. It should be noted that reflections 1 1 0T/T′′ and 0 0 1T/T′′ are located in two different spatial planes, and therefore, cannot be represented in a 2D drawing.
Figure 9. Schematic idealized illustration of grains with a preferred orientation of crystal structure and their impact on a diffractogram. The initially randomly oriented grains (left) are oriented towards 0 0 1T/T′′ (right). Since parts of the grains still have a preferred orientation towards 1 1 0T/T′′, a 1 1 0T/T′′ reflection remains. It should be noted that reflections 1 1 0T/T′′ and 0 0 1T/T′′ are located in two different spatial planes, and therefore, cannot be represented in a 2D drawing.
Materials 15 04471 g009
Materials 15 04471 g010 550
Figure 10. Schematic and idealized illustration of the formation of the rhombohedral phase and its consequences at the grain and unit cell levels. Polishing with coarse polishers induced a phase transformation to the rhombohedral phase (above). In comparison to the transformation to the monoclinic phase, a higher volume expansion (values based on atoms per volume ratio; cf. Table 6) and shear occur (below).
Figure 10. Schematic and idealized illustration of the formation of the rhombohedral phase and its consequences at the grain and unit cell levels. Polishing with coarse polishers induced a phase transformation to the rhombohedral phase (above). In comparison to the transformation to the monoclinic phase, a higher volume expansion (values based on atoms per volume ratio; cf. Table 6) and shear occur (below).
Materials 15 04471 g010
Table
Table 2. Every different step of processing of FDPs. Each technical tool was applied individually to one sintered FDP.
Table 2. Every different step of processing of FDPs. Each technical tool was applied individually to one sintered FDP.
Treatment NumberProcessing Step
1Sintered (glazed) FDP
2Sintered (glazed) FDP processed with a coarse diamond bur
3Sintered (glazed) FDP processed with a fine diamond bur
4Sintered (glazed) FDP processed with a coarse polisher
5Sintered (glazed) FDP processed with a fine polisher
Table
Table 3. Overview of the dental technical tool used for processing FDPs.
Table 3. Overview of the dental technical tool used for processing FDPs.
Dental Technical ToolRevolutions
rpm		Vertical Load
N		Time of Processing
min
Coarse diamond bur400,0005–154
Fine diamond bur400,0005–154
Coarse polisher10,0005–154
Fine polisher50005–154
Table
Table 4. Maximum temperatures measured on the diamond bur and FDP surfaces.
Table 4. Maximum temperatures measured on the diamond bur and FDP surfaces.
Max. Temperatures on the Diamond Burs in °CMax. Temperatures on the FDPs in °C
Coarse diamond bur>320~190
Fine diamond bur>320~190
Table
Table 5. Maximum temperatures measured on the polisher and FDP surfaces.
Table 5. Maximum temperatures measured on the polisher and FDP surfaces.
Max. Temperatures on the Polisher in °CMax. Temperatures on the FDP in °C
Coarse polisher~175~90
Fine polisher~115~65
Table
Table 6. Properties of the different elementary cells of the refined phases.
Table 6. Properties of the different elementary cells of the refined phases.
Crystal SystemO- Bonds
per Zr- Atom		Atoms per
Elementary Cell		Volume in Å3Volume per Atom in Å3
Cubic81213311
Tetragonal866711
Monoclinic71214412
Rhombohedral65774813
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wertz, M.; Schmidt, M.B.; Hoelzig, H.; Wagner, M.; Abel, B.; Kloess, G.; Hahnel, S.; Koenig, A. Rhombohedral Phase Formation in Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Induced by Dental Technical Tools and Its Impact on Dental Applications. Materials 2022, 15, 4471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134471

AMA Style

Wertz M, Schmidt MB, Hoelzig H, Wagner M, Abel B, Kloess G, Hahnel S, Koenig A. Rhombohedral Phase Formation in Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Induced by Dental Technical Tools and Its Impact on Dental Applications. Materials. 2022; 15(13):4471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134471

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wertz, Markus, Michael Benno Schmidt, Hieronymus Hoelzig, Maximilian Wagner, Bernd Abel, Gert Kloess, Sebastian Hahnel, and Andreas Koenig. 2022. "Rhombohedral Phase Formation in Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Induced by Dental Technical Tools and Its Impact on Dental Applications" Materials 15, no. 13: 4471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134471

APA Style

Wertz, M., Schmidt, M. B., Hoelzig, H., Wagner, M., Abel, B., Kloess, G., Hahnel, S., & Koenig, A. (2022). Rhombohedral Phase Formation in Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Induced by Dental Technical Tools and Its Impact on Dental Applications. Materials, 15(13), 4471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134471

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop