Next Article in Journal
Fast-Setting Concrete for Repairing Cement Concrete Pavement
Next Article in Special Issue
Rational Design of Flexible Mechanical Force Sensors for Healthcare and Diagnosis
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation of UV Debonding Acrylate Adhesives by a Postgrafting Reaction
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Wave Propagation in the Viscoelastic Functionally Graded Cylindrical Shell Based on the First-Order Shear Deformation Theory

Materials 2023, 16(17), 5914; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16175914
by Yunying Zhou 1,*, Dongying Liu 2,*, Dinggui Hou 1, Jiahuan Liu 1, Xiaoliang Li 1 and Zhijie Yue 1
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4: Anonymous
Materials 2023, 16(17), 5914; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16175914
Submission received: 20 July 2023 / Revised: 24 August 2023 / Accepted: 27 August 2023 / Published: 29 August 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The present contribution has novelty aspects. I invite to the authors to read the review report.  

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for the rigorous review and bringing several new ideas to the authors. We have thoroughly checked the full paper and rewrite some paragraphs to make the paper more concise, which are highlighted in yellow in the paper.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors analytically solved the wave equation of longitudinal guiding waves in viscoelastic orthotropic cylindrical shells and explained the inner meaning of wave propagation. Using the obtained expressions, the phase velocity curves and the guide wave damping curves for the FGM shell are calculated, and the influence of viscoelasticity parameters, material gradient models, material volume fractions and size ratios on the phase velocity curves and damping curves is studied. The results of this study may provide a theoretical basis for the excellent performance of composite structures and ultrasonic devices. I believe that this manuscript is undoubtedly recommended for publication in the journal Materials, as it represents a high level of fundamental scientific results in the field of materials science.

Author Response

Thank the reviewer for the rigorous review of this paper. We have thoroughly checked the full paper and rewrite some paragraphs to make the paper more concise, which are highlighted in yellow in the paper.

Reviewer 3 Report

In line 132, equation (2) is not a dynamic equation. It is the definition of strains.

Labels of figures should be clearly given. Please add Labels in addition to the symbols. Also, what does "C" stand for in Figure 3?

Figures 3, 4, and 8 have more lines than the items in the legends. Please clearly present your figures. 

The value n starts from 1 in equation (8), and in line 175, it states "non-dimensional wave number K=0-0.7 for both n=0 and n=1". What do you mean by n=0?

 

 

Author Response

Thank you for the rigorous review and bringing several new ideas to the authors. We have thoroughly checked the full paper and rewrite some paragraphs to make the paper more concise, which are highlighted in yellow in the paper.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

Dear authors it is a nice subject you studied but there are some errors in your manuscript:

-        please highlight your contributions to the model to better understand your work and please explain how you have validated your model.

-        please compare your model with other existing models

-        please present the input data you used in the computational process.

-        please compare your result with results obtained by other models.

-        highlight the advantages of your model (calculation time, errors, …)

Author Response

Thank you for the rigorous review and bringing several new ideas to the authors. We have thoroughly checked the full paper and rewrite some paragraphs to make the paper more concise, which are highlighted in yellow in the paper.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Thank you for the authors' responses.

The figures are still unclear and there are more lines than the legend. The authors said that there are different modes but the reviewer cannot recognize which lines indicate which mode. Please make the figure more clearly.

Author Response

Thank you for your rigorous review.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

Dear authors, thank you for your answers

Author Response

Thank you for your rigorous review.

Back to TopTop