Next Article in Journal
Pyrolysis Kinetic Behavior and Thermodynamic Analysis of PET Nonwoven Fabric
Previous Article in Journal
Advancing High-Performance Metal Matrix Composites: Uniting Nature’s Design and Engineering Innovation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Bisphosphonates and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by
Nabaa Sulaiman
1,†,
Fadi Fadhul
1,† and
Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
2,*
1
Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, 214 21 Malmö, Sweden
2
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, 214 21 Malmö, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Materials 2023, 16(18), 6078; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186078
Submission received: 17 August 2023 / Revised: 4 September 2023 / Accepted: 4 September 2023 / Published: 5 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Biomaterials)

Abstract

The purpose of the present systematic review was to investigate the influence of bisphosphonates (BPs) on the dental implant failure rate and marginal bone loss (MBL). An electronic search was undertaken in three databases, plus a manual search of journals. Meta-analyses were performed, besides a meta-regression in order to verify how the log odds ratio (OR) was associated with follow-up time. The five- and ten-year estimated implant survivals were calculated. The review included 33 publications. Altogether, there were 1727 and 21,986 implants placed in patients taking and not taking BPs, respectively. A pairwise meta-analysis (26 studies) showed that implants in BP patients had a higher failure risk in comparison to non-BP patients (OR 1.653, p = 0.047). There was an estimated decrease of 0.004 in log OR for every additional month of follow-up, although it was not significant (p = 0.259). The global estimated implant survival in patients taking BPs after 5 and 10 years was 94.2% (95% CI, 94.0–94.4) and 90.1% (95% CI, 89.8–90.3), respectively. It was not possible to make any reliable analysis concerning MBL, as only two studies reported MBL results separated by groups. There is a 65.3% higher risk of implant failure in patients taking BPs in comparison to patients not taking this class of drugs.
Keywords: dental implants; bisphosphonates; implant failure; marginal bone loss; systematic review; meta-analysis dental implants; bisphosphonates; implant failure; marginal bone loss; systematic review; meta-analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sulaiman, N.; Fadhul, F.; Chrcanovic, B.R. Bisphosphonates and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Materials 2023, 16, 6078. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186078

AMA Style

Sulaiman N, Fadhul F, Chrcanovic BR. Bisphosphonates and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Materials. 2023; 16(18):6078. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186078

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sulaiman, Nabaa, Fadi Fadhul, and Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic. 2023. "Bisphosphonates and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" Materials 16, no. 18: 6078. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186078

APA Style

Sulaiman, N., Fadhul, F., & Chrcanovic, B. R. (2023). Bisphosphonates and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Materials, 16(18), 6078. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186078

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop