Next Article in Journal
The Stiffness and Damping Characteristics of a Rubber-Based SMA Composite Shock Absorber with a Hyper-Elastic SMA-Constitutive Model Considering the Loading Rate
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of an LPSO Phase Induced by Zn Addition on the High-Temperature Properties of Mg-9Gd-2Nd-(1.5Zn)-0.5Zr Alloy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Optimized Design of Low-Carbon Mix Ratio for Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II Concrete Based on Genetic Algorithm-Improved Back Propagation

1
Department of School of Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Green Building in Western China, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
3
Key Laboratory of Structural Engineering and Seismic Education, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(16), 4077; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17164077
Submission received: 27 June 2024 / Revised: 10 August 2024 / Accepted: 14 August 2024 / Published: 16 August 2024

Abstract

In order to achieve low-carbon optimization in the intelligent mix ratio design of concrete materials, this work first constructs a concrete mix ratio database and performs a statistical characteristics analysis. Secondly, it employs a standard back propagation (BP) and a genetic algorithm-improved BP (GA-BP) to predict the concrete mix ratio. The NSGA-II algorithm is then used to optimize the mix ratio. Finally, the method’s accuracy is validated through experiments. The study’s results indicate that the statistical characteristics of the concrete mix ratio data show a wide distribution range and good representativeness. Compared to the standard BP, the fitting accuracies of each GA-BP set are improved by 4.9%, 0.3%, 16.7%, and 4.6%, respectively. According to the Fast Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) optimization for meeting C50 concrete strength requirements, the optimal concrete mix ratio is as follows: cement 331.3 kg/m3, sand 639.4 kg/m3, stone 1039 kg/m3, fly ash 56 kg/m3, water 153 kg/m3, and water-reducing agent 0.632 kg/m3. The 28-day compressive strength, material cost, and carbon emissions show relative errors of 2.1%, 0.6%, and 2.9%, respectively. Compared with commercial concrete of the same strength grade, costs and carbon emissions are reduced by 7.2% and 15.9%, respectively. The methodology used in this study not only significantly improves the accuracy of concrete design but also considers the carbon emissions involved in the concrete preparation process, reflecting the strength, economic, and environmental impacts of material design. Practitioners are encouraged to explore integrated low-carbon research that spans from material selection to structural optimization.
Keywords: machine learning; intensity prediction; BP; GA-BP; NSGA-II optimization machine learning; intensity prediction; BP; GA-BP; NSGA-II optimization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, F.; Wen, B.; Niu, D.; Li, A.; Guo, B. Optimized Design of Low-Carbon Mix Ratio for Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II Concrete Based on Genetic Algorithm-Improved Back Propagation. Materials 2024, 17, 4077. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17164077

AMA Style

Zhang F, Wen B, Niu D, Li A, Guo B. Optimized Design of Low-Carbon Mix Ratio for Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II Concrete Based on Genetic Algorithm-Improved Back Propagation. Materials. 2024; 17(16):4077. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17164077

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Fan, Bo Wen, Ditao Niu, Anbang Li, and Bingbing Guo. 2024. "Optimized Design of Low-Carbon Mix Ratio for Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II Concrete Based on Genetic Algorithm-Improved Back Propagation" Materials 17, no. 16: 4077. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17164077

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop