Figure 1.
Preparation Technology.
Figure 1.
Preparation Technology.
Figure 2.
Cement jump table test bench.
Figure 2.
Cement jump table test bench.
Figure 3.
Impermeability test device. (a) Vacuum barrel, (b) Electric flux device.
Figure 3.
Impermeability test device. (a) Vacuum barrel, (b) Electric flux device.
Figure 4.
Marine concrete electric flux test block.
Figure 4.
Marine concrete electric flux test block.
Figure 5.
Test process of sulfate corrosion resistance. (a) Immersion in 5% sodium sulfate solution, (b) Oven low temperature drying, (c) Weighing, (d) Compression test, (e) Compressive failure of specimens.
Figure 5.
Test process of sulfate corrosion resistance. (a) Immersion in 5% sodium sulfate solution, (b) Oven low temperature drying, (c) Weighing, (d) Compression test, (e) Compressive failure of specimens.
Figure 6.
Marine concrete freeze-thaw cycle test block.
Figure 6.
Marine concrete freeze-thaw cycle test block.
Figure 7.
Freeze-thaw testing machine.
Figure 7.
Freeze-thaw testing machine.
Figure 8.
Electron microscope.
Figure 8.
Electron microscope.
Figure 9.
The measurement results of the current change with time of marine concrete at different curing temperatures are adopted. (a) Standard maintenance environment, (b) High temperature curing environment.
Figure 9.
The measurement results of the current change with time of marine concrete at different curing temperatures are adopted. (a) Standard maintenance environment, (b) High temperature curing environment.
Figure 10.
The variation value of concrete current with time under high temperature curing condition with different sands.
Figure 10.
The variation value of concrete current with time under high temperature curing condition with different sands.
Figure 11.
The change value of concrete current with time whether the admixture is added or not.
Figure 11.
The change value of concrete current with time whether the admixture is added or not.
Figure 12.
Measurement results of electric flux of concrete cured at different temperatures.
Figure 12.
Measurement results of electric flux of concrete cured at different temperatures.
Figure 13.
The mass change value of concrete specimens with different dry-wet cycles under non-curing conditions. (a) Standard curing conditions, (b) High temperature curing conditions.
Figure 13.
The mass change value of concrete specimens with different dry-wet cycles under non-curing conditions. (a) Standard curing conditions, (b) High temperature curing conditions.
Figure 14.
Changes in compressive strength of concrete specimens for 120 wet and dry cycles. Note: Mix proportion-maintenance method, -1 is the standard maintenance condition; -2 is high temperature curing condition.
Figure 14.
Changes in compressive strength of concrete specimens for 120 wet and dry cycles. Note: Mix proportion-maintenance method, -1 is the standard maintenance condition; -2 is high temperature curing condition.
Figure 15.
Corrosion resistance coefficient of concrete compressive strength. Note: Mix proportion-maintenance method, -1 is the standard maintenance condition; -2 is high temperature curing condition.
Figure 15.
Corrosion resistance coefficient of concrete compressive strength. Note: Mix proportion-maintenance method, -1 is the standard maintenance condition; -2 is high temperature curing condition.
Figure 16.
Quality change value of concrete specimens with different freeze-thaw cycles under curing conditions. (a) Standard curing conditions, (b) High temperature curing conditions.
Figure 16.
Quality change value of concrete specimens with different freeze-thaw cycles under curing conditions. (a) Standard curing conditions, (b) High temperature curing conditions.
Figure 17.
The change value of compressive strength of concrete specimens after 500 freeze-thaw cycles.
Figure 17.
The change value of compressive strength of concrete specimens after 500 freeze-thaw cycles.
Figure 18.
Loss rate of compressive strength of concrete. Note: Mix proportion-maintenance method, -1 is the standard maintenance condition; -2 is high temperature curing condition.
Figure 18.
Loss rate of compressive strength of concrete. Note: Mix proportion-maintenance method, -1 is the standard maintenance condition; -2 is high temperature curing condition.
Figure 19.
SEM Pictures of UHPC Materials in Various Combinations at the Age of 28 Days. (a1) 1-1 Group standard maintenance, (a2) 1-2 Combined with high temperature curing, (b1) 2-1 Group standard maintenance, (b2) 2-2 Combined with high temperature curing, (c1) 3-1 Group standard maintenance, (c2) 3-2 Combined with high temperature curing, (d1) 4-1 Group standard maintenance, (d2) 4-2 Combined with high temperature curing.
Figure 19.
SEM Pictures of UHPC Materials in Various Combinations at the Age of 28 Days. (a1) 1-1 Group standard maintenance, (a2) 1-2 Combined with high temperature curing, (b1) 2-1 Group standard maintenance, (b2) 2-2 Combined with high temperature curing, (c1) 3-1 Group standard maintenance, (c2) 3-2 Combined with high temperature curing, (d1) 4-1 Group standard maintenance, (d2) 4-2 Combined with high temperature curing.
Figure 20.
SEM morphology of each group after 500 freeze-thaw cycles. (a) 1 Interfix, (b) 2 Interfix, (c) 3 Interfix, (d) 4 Interfix.
Figure 20.
SEM morphology of each group after 500 freeze-thaw cycles. (a) 1 Interfix, (b) 2 Interfix, (c) 3 Interfix, (d) 4 Interfix.
Figure 21.
SEM morphology of each group after 120 dry-wet cycles. (a) 1 Interfix, (b) 2 Interfix, (c) 3 Interfix, (d) 4 Interfix.
Figure 21.
SEM morphology of each group after 120 dry-wet cycles. (a) 1 Interfix, (b) 2 Interfix, (c) 3 Interfix, (d) 4 Interfix.
Figure 22.
SEM morphology of samples after anti-permeability test of each group. (a) 1 Interfix, (b) 2 Interfix, (c) 3 Interfix, (d) 4 Interfix.
Figure 22.
SEM morphology of samples after anti-permeability test of each group. (a) 1 Interfix, (b) 2 Interfix, (c) 3 Interfix, (d) 4 Interfix.
Table 1.
Design of the Dosage of Each Component of UHPC.
Table 1.
Design of the Dosage of Each Component of UHPC.
Grade | Water-Binder Ratio | Cementitious Material Content (kg/m3) | Steel Fiber Volume Fraction (%) | Silica Fume (g) | Cement (g) |
---|
UHPC | ≤0.22 | ≤850 | ≥0.7 | ≥cementitious material content 10% | ≥cementitious material content 50% |
Table 2.
Workability and mechanical performance indicators of UHPC.
Table 2.
Workability and mechanical performance indicators of UHPC.
Grade | Degree of Fluidity (mm) | Break Off Strength (MPa) | Compressive Strength (MPa) | Elastic Modulus (GPa) | Tensile Strength |
---|
UHPC | ≥160 | ≥12 | ≥100 | ≥40 | ≥5 |
Table 3.
Durability performance indicators of UHPC.
Table 3.
Durability performance indicators of UHPC.
Freezing Resistance (Quick Freezing Method) | Resistance to Chloride Ion Permeability (C) | Sulfate Resistance |
---|
≥F500 | Q ≤ 100 | ≥KS120 |
Table 4.
Quartz sand bulk density and porosity.
Table 4.
Quartz sand bulk density and porosity.
Maximum Particle Size | Single Grain Grading | Continuous Grading |
---|
Dmax (mm) | Apparent Density (kg/m3) | Bulk Density (kg/m3) | Porosity (%) | Apparent Density (kg/m3) | Bulk Density (kg/m3) | Porosity (%) |
---|
0.315 | 2659.30 | 1443.94 | 45.70 | - | - | - |
0.63 | 2667.37 | 1482.09 | 44.44 | 1540.67 | 1540.67 | 42.09 |
1.25 | 2646.35 | 1538.72 | 41.86 | 2651.28 | 1600.22 | 39.64 |
Table 5.
Mix ratio.
Material Peer Group | W/B | Cement (g) | Coal Fly Ash (g) | Slag Powder (g) | Silica Fume (g) | Standard Sand (g) | Quartz Sand (Coarse) (g) | Quartz Sand (Middle) (g) | Steel Fiber (g) | Water Reducing Admixture (g) |
---|
Initial mix ratio 1 | 0.13 | 985 | - | - | - | 1170 | - | - | 180 | 4.93 |
Initial mix ratio 2 | 0.13 | 900 | - | - | - | - | 740 | 360 | 180 | 4.50 |
Initial mix ratio 3 | 0.13 | 576 | 189 | 63 | 72 | 1170 | - | - | 180 | 4.50 |
Initial mix ratio 4 | 0.13 | 630 | 202 | 68 | 90 | - | 791 | 339 | 180 | 4.95 |
Optimized mix ratio 1 | 0.17 | 985 | - | - | - | 1170 | - | - | 180 | 9.85 |
Optimized mix ratio 2 | 0.17 | 915 | - | - | - | - | 660 | 420 | 167 | 9.15 |
Optimized mix ratio 3 | 0.17 | 576 | 189 | 63 | 72 | 1070 | - | - | 164.5 | 9.00 |
Optimized mix ratio 4 | 0.17 | 630 | 202 | 68 | 90 | - | 810 | 358 | 180 | 9.90 |
Table 6.
Mix ratio fluidity (mm).
Table 6.
Mix ratio fluidity (mm).
Mix Proportion | Initial Mix Ratio 1 | Initial Mix Ratio 2 | Initial Mix Ratio 3 | Initial Mix Ratio 4 | Optimized Mix Ratio 1 | Optimized Mix Ratio 2 | Optimized Mix Ratio 3 | Optimized Mix Ratio 4 |
---|
Degree of fluidity | 143 | 136 | 145 | 138 | 185 | 178 | 165 | 163 |
Table 7.
Physical properties of the cement.
Table 7.
Physical properties of the cement.
Standard Consistency Water Consumption (%) | Specific Surface Area (m2/kg) | Stability | Density (g/cm3) | Initial Setting Time (min) | Final Setting Time (min) |
---|
28.6 | 388 | 1 | 2.62 | 212 | 285 |
Table 8.
Chemical composition of the cement.
Table 8.
Chemical composition of the cement.
Chemical Composition | MgO | SO3 | CaO | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | SiO2 | Ignition Loss |
---|
Cement | 4.26 | 2.37 | 60.31 | 5.14 | 3.02 | 20.13 | 4.77 |
Table 9.
Technical index of fly ash.
Table 9.
Technical index of fly ash.
Ignition Loss (%) | Moisture Content (%) | SO3 (%) | CaO (%) |
---|
2.20 | 0.20 | 1.70 | 0.10 |
Table 10.
Technical index of silica fume.
Table 10.
Technical index of silica fume.
Activity Index (%) | SiO2 (%) | Ignition Loss (%) |
---|
108 | 94.8 | 3.28 |
Table 11.
Technical index of slag powder.
Table 11.
Technical index of slag powder.
Density (g/cm3) | SO3 (%) | Cl (%) | Glass Content (%) | Ignition Loss (%) |
---|
7.55 | 3.47 | 0.02 | 91.6 | 0.62 |
Table 12.
Standard sand technical indicators.
Table 12.
Standard sand technical indicators.
Soil Content (%) | Density (g/cm3) | Ignition Loss (%) | SiO2 (%) |
---|
0.10 | 2.67 | 0.23 | 99.6 |
Table 13.
Standard sand gradation (mm).
Table 13.
Standard sand gradation (mm).
>2.0 | 2.0~1.0 | 1.0~0.5 | 0.5~0.15 | 0.15~0.075 | <0.075 | Summation |
---|
0 | 33 | 34 | 20 | 12 | 1 | 100 |
Table 14.
Quartz sand technical indicators.
Table 14.
Quartz sand technical indicators.
SiO2 (%) | Cl (%) | Sulfide and Sulfate (%) | Mica (%) |
---|
98.8 | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.02 |
Table 15.
Quartz sand gradation.
Table 15.
Quartz sand gradation.
Particle Size Requirements (mm) | 1.25~0.63 mm | 0.63~0.315 mm |
---|
≥1.25 | <0.63 | ≥0.63 | <0.315 |
---|
Super-size particle content (%) | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
Table 16.
Measurement Results of the Electric Flux Values of UHPC with Different Curing Temperatures.
Table 16.
Measurement Results of the Electric Flux Values of UHPC with Different Curing Temperatures.
Peer Group | Electric Flux (C) | The Converted Electric Flux (C) |
---|
1-1 | 217.00 | 195.84 |
1-2 | 100.96 | 91.12 |
2-1 | 202.73 | 182.96 |
2-2 | 91.72 | 82.78 |
3-1 | 146.37 | 132.10 |
3-2 | 73.27 | 66.13 |
4-1 | 139.59 | 125.98 |
4-2 | 62.41 | 56.32 |
Table 17.
Anti-chloride ion erosion grade of concrete.
Table 17.
Anti-chloride ion erosion grade of concrete.
Electric Conduction Quantity (C) | >4000 | 2000~4000 | 1000~2000 | 100~1000 | <100 |
---|
Chloride ion permeability | High | Middle | low | extreme low | Neglect |
Table 18.
Concrete mass change rate at different curing temperatures (%).
Table 18.
Concrete mass change rate at different curing temperatures (%).
The Number of Freeze-Thaw Cycles | Standard Maintenance (%) | High Temperature Curing (%) |
---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
100 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
200 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.1 | 0.09 | 0.1 |
300 | 0.28 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.17 |
400 | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.2 | 0.22 |
500 | 0.64 | 0.52 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.28 |
Table 19.
Determination results of concrete compressive strength under different freeze-thaw cycles.
Table 19.
Determination results of concrete compressive strength under different freeze-thaw cycles.
Peer Group | Initial Strength (MPa) | 500 Freeze-Thaw Cycles (MPa) | Compressive Strength Loss Rate (%) |
---|
1-1 | 120.8 | 110.5 | 8.53 |
1-2 | 124.3 | 116.9 | 5.95 |
2-1 | 116.5 | 109.3 | 6.18 |
2-2 | 122.6 | 116.8 | 4.73 |
3-1 | 122.5 | 115.7 | 5.55 |
3-2 | 130.8 | 126.4 | 3.36 |
4-1 | 123.8 | 118.5 | 4.28 |
4-2 | 139.6 | 135.7 | 2.79 |