Next Article in Journal
Influence of Accelerated Carbonation Conditions on the Physical Properties Improvement of Recycled Coarse Aggregate
Previous Article in Journal
Thermodynamic Modeling and Experimental Validation for Thermal Beneficiation of Tungsten-Bearing Materials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microscopic and Biomechanical Analysis of PEEK Interspinous Spacers for Spinal Fusion Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CO2-Responsive Worm-like Micelle Based on Double-Tailed Surfactant

1
Sinopec Key Laboratory of Drilling Completion and Fracturing of Shale Oil and Gas, Beijing 102206, China
2
CNOOC Institute of Chemicals & Advanced Materials (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing 102209, China
3
Zhejiang Research Institute of Tianjin University, Shaoxing 312369, China
4
Shengli Oilfield Company, SINOPEC, Dongying 257092, China
5
State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering, Polymer Research Institute, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(4), 902; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18040902
Submission received: 1 February 2025 / Revised: 13 February 2025 / Accepted: 15 February 2025 / Published: 19 February 2025

Abstract

:
CO2-responsive worm-like micelles (WLMs) are considered promising for applications in smart materials, enhanced oil recovery, and drug delivery because of their reversible and tunable properties. This study presents a novel system of CO2-responsive WLMs, which is constructed using a double-tailed surfactant (DTS). When exposed to CO2, the DTS molecules undergo protonation, resulting in the formation of ultra-long-chain cationic surfactants that self-assemble into worm-like micelles. The zero-shear viscosity of the DTS–CO2 solution achieves approximately 300,000 mPa·s, which is 300,000 times higher than that of pure water. In contrast, the DTS–air solution exhibits a viscosity of only 2 mPa·s. The system retains a viscosity above 100,000 mPa·s across a temperature range of 25–120 °C under a CO2 atmosphere. Moreover, it demonstrates reversible transitions between high- and low-viscosity states without any loss of responsiveness, even after multiple cycles. The critical overlap concentration of the DTS–CO2 micellar system is determined to be 80 mM. This research offers valuable insights into the development of CO2-responsive surfactants, highlighting their potential for designing advanced functional materials.

1. Introduction

Worm-like micelles [1,2] are flexible, long-chain nanostructures self-assembled by surfactant molecules in solution, named for their worm-like shape. They are typically formed by amphiphilic molecules with hydrophilic and hydrophobic segments through spontaneous hydrophobic interactions and electrostatic forces. The length of these micelles can reach the micrometer scale, while their diameter is usually in the nanometer range, exhibiting high flexibility and dynamic behavior. Worm-like micelles demonstrate unique rheological properties in solution, such as viscoelasticity and shear-thinning effects, making them widely applicable in fields such as cosmetics, drug delivery [3,4], oil recovery [5,6,7], and friction reduction [8,9,10].
Stimuli-responsive worm-like micelles with tunable rheological properties have attracted increasing attention. Common methods for forming worm-like micelles via external stimuli include pH [11,12], temperature [9,13], photochemistry [14,15], redox reactions [16], and the most popular, CO2 [17]. Upon exposure to these stimuli, the solution viscosity rapidly increases to its maximum value. Subsequently, by introducing another stimulus or removing the initial stimulus, the high-viscosity system can return to its original low-viscosity state. Due to this unique “on–off” switchable and recyclable behavior, stimuli-responsive worm-like micelles have shown great potential for applications.
CO2-responsive materials have emerged in recent years as a green innovation in chemical research, originating from chemists’ exploration of CO2 absorbents for greenhouse gas mitigation. These materials are a novel class of substances whose molecular structures can be altered by introducing CO2 gas, thereby controlling the surface properties of their solutions [18,19]. As a greenhouse gas, CO2 is abundant, relatively inexpensive, and easy to handle. Additionally, CO2 dissolves in water and can be easily removed without accumulation, posing no environmental pollution risks [20]. CO2-responsive worm-like micelles are essentially formed when neutral substances in aqueous solutions interact with CO2 and become protonated, imparting cationic surfactant-like properties to the neutral molecules. This triggers aggregation behavior in the solution, leading to the transition from spherical micelles to worm-like micelles, which macroscopically manifests as a significant increase in solution viscosity.
The CO2-responsive mechanism is as follows: when CO2 gas is introduced into an aqueous solution of tertiary amines, CO2 exists in both free and dissolved states, reaching a gas-liquid equilibrium (Scheme 1). The basic tertiary amines react with dissolved CO2 in the solution through an acid-base neutralization reaction, forming bicarbonate structures, while the tertiary amine groups are protonated into quaternary ammonium cation structures. This enhances the hydrophilicity of the amine groups. We can introduce another stimulus into the solution in order to decrease the free CO2 concentration., disrupting the gas-liquid equilibrium. As the equilibrium shifts to the left (Scheme 1), the bicarbonate structure decomposes, and the quaternary ammonium structure undergoes deprotonation to revert to tertiary amine groups. Jessop group [18] first reported a CO2-switchable surfactant containing amidine groups. Before introducing CO2 gas, the material exhibited low hydrophilicity and lacked surfactant properties. However, upon CO2 introduction, highly hydrophilic amidinium bicarbonate ionic head groups were formed, which, combined with the hydrophobic alkyl chains, constituted a surfactant structure capable of significantly reducing the surface tension of aqueous solutions and exhibiting surfactant properties. Subsequently, this switchable surfactant was applied to emulsify and reduce the viscosity of heavy oil, becoming a research hotspot both domestically and internationally. Zhang et al. [21] prepared a viscoelastic “pseudo-gemini” surfactant under CO2 stimulation using a mixed solution of N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-1,3-propane diamine (TMPDA) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at a molar ratio of 1:2. When CO2 was introduced into the mixed solution, the tertiary amine TMPDA was protonated, resulting in positively charged groups at both ends of the molecule. These molecules then self-assembled with SDS in solution through electrostatic attraction to form worm-like micelles, exhibiting excellent viscoelasticity. When N2 was introduced, or the solution was heated to remove CO2, the positively charged TMPDA underwent deprotonation to revert to neutral tertiary amines, separating from SDS. The worm-like micelles transitioned back into spherical micelles, and the system returned to its original low-viscosity state. Su et al. [22] prepared a CO2-responsive anionic worm-like micelle system using sodium octadecyl sulfate (C18H37SO4Na) and N,N-dimethylethanolamine (DMAE) at 60 °C. Under CO2 stimulation, DMAE was protonated to carry a positive charge, and it self-assembled with the anionic surfactant C18H37SO4Na through electrostatic attraction to form worm-like micelles. When N2 was introduced, the high-viscosity system reverted to its initial low-viscosity state. This process could be repeated more than three times, with minimal variation in the maximum viscosity achieved. By simply mixing two commercial reagents (such as stearic acid and cyclen), the formation of CO2-switchable pseudo-tetrameric surfactants was successfully achieved, which subsequently self-assembled into CO2-switchable worm-like micelles. Through the use of CO2, the rheological properties were cycled between a low-viscosity fluid and a viscoelastic fluid [23]. Most of the existing CO2-responsive surfactants possess conventional surfactant structures, with only a single tail chain in their molecular structure.
Double-tail surfactants are typically composed of two hydrophobic tail chains and a single hydrophilic head group. Compared to conventional single-tail surfactants, double-tail surfactants contain two alkyl chains, resulting in a larger hydrophobic moiety and stronger intermolecular hydrophobic interactions. Since hydrophobic interactions are the primary driving force for surfactant self-assembly [24], the two hydrophobic chains of double-tail surfactants facilitate the self-assembly process. According to the packing parameter theory, such surfactants tend to form vesicles and lamellar structures [25,26]. Due to the similarity of these aggregates to phospholipid bilayers, double-tail surfactants are often used to mimic biological membranes for studying processes such as transmembrane transport. In addition, compared to single-tail surfactants, double-tail surfactants generally exhibit higher interfacial activity, with enhanced dispersion, emulsification [27], and wetting [28] capabilities. As a result, double-tail surfactants hold great potential for applications in fields such as detergents [29] and drug delivery [30]. However, the larger hydrophobic moiety also contributes to an increased Krafft point and reduced water solubility, which significantly limits their applications.
Based on the aforementioned characteristics of double-tail surfactants, we aim to design and synthesize CO2-responsive double-tail surfactants and investigate their ability to form worm-like micelles. By incorporating CO2-responsive functional groups into the molecular structure, these surfactants can exhibit tunable self-assembly behavior under external CO2 stimuli. The presence of two hydrophobic tail chains is expected to enhance the hydrophobic interactions, facilitating the formation of worm-like micelles and potentially improving the structural stability and responsiveness of aqueous solutions.

2. Experimental Procedures

2.1. Materials

Diethyl malonate, 1-bromododecane, sodium hydride, 3-dimethylaminopropylamine, and thionyl chloride were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MI, USA). Carbon dioxide (CO2, purity ≥ 99.998%) and nitrogen (N2, purity 99.998%) were used without further purification. Throughout the study, deionized water with a resistivity of 18.25 MΩ·cm was provided by a CDUPT-III ultrapure water purifier (Chengdu Ultrapure Technology Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China).

2.2. Preparation of Surfactant Solution

An appropriate amount of DTS was accurately weighed and dissolved in a specified volume of triple-distilled water. The mixture was heated in a water bath until the waxy solid melted and formed a liquid oil film. CO2 gas at a pressure of 0.1 MPa and a flow rate of approximately 0.1 L·min−1 was introduced into the system at room temperature. The mixture was continuously shaken until a homogeneous and transparent solution was obtained. The system was sealed and stored at room temperature, and the resulting solution was labeled as “DTS–CO2”. A series of diluted solutions were treated with CO2 gas for 10–15 s with continuous shaking. The resulting solutions were then sealed and stored.
The preparation of DTS–air involved introducing air at a pressure of 0.1 MPa and a flow rate of approximately 0.1 L·min−1 into 10 mL of the DTS–CO2 solution for approximately 20 min. This process resulted in the formation of a low-viscosity emulsion.

2.3. pH Measurement

The pH of the sample was measured using the S2-T Kit pH meter (Mettler Toledo, Zurich, Switzerland). Prior to the measurement, the electrode of the pH meter was thoroughly rinsed with deionized water. During the measurement, the pH meter reading was recorded at 25 °C after stabilization. The measurement was repeated three times, and the average value was calculated.

2.4. Conductivity Measurement

The conductivity of aqueous solutions was measured using an EF30 conductometer (Mettler Toledo, Mississauga, ON, Canada) at 25 °C. The reagent bottle containing the sample was placed in a thermostatic water bath maintained at the specified temperature. After 30 min, the conductivity measurement electrode was immersed into the sample solution. The solution was allowed to reach the set temperature and remain stable before further measurements were conducted. The measurement button was pressed to initiate the conductivity measurement, and the corresponding conductivity value was recorded. Each sample was measured in triplicate, ensuring a relative deviation of less than 2%. The average value of the three replicate measurements was calculated and reported as the conductivity value of the corresponding sample.

2.5. Rheological Property Testing

The rheological properties of the samples were analyzed using a Physica MCR301 rheometer (Anton Paar, Graz, Austria) equipped with a CC27 concentric cylinder rotor (radius: 13.33 mm) and a stator (radius: 14.46 mm). The temperature of the sample was controlled using a Peltier system with an accuracy of ±0.01 °C, while a solvent trap was used to minimize evaporation. The instrument was calibrated using Cannon standard oil prior to testing. The samples were equilibrated in a water bath at the specified temperature for 1 h and then stabilized in the stator for 5 min prior to testing. Steady shear experiments were conducted at shear rates ranging from 10−3 to 102 s−1. Dynamic rheological tests included stress sweeps performed at 1 Hz to identify the linear viscoelastic region, followed by frequency sweeps ranging from 0.05 to 100 rad·s−1.

2.6. Cryo-TEM Observation

Firstly, the surfactant solution was prepared by dissolving it to an appropriate concentration and adding a cryoprotectant to minimize ice crystal formation. The solution was then applied onto a cryo-carrier to form a thin layer, followed by rapid freezing to liquid nitrogen temperatures using techniques such as high-pressure freezing or plunge freezing. Finally, the frozen sample was transferred to a cryo-transfer device, such as a cryo-transfer rod, for observation under low-temperature conditions in the electron microscope.
The microstructure of the micelle solutions was examined using a cryogenic transmission electron microscope (Cryo-TEM, model JEM2010, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The operating conditions of the instrument included an accelerating voltage of 200 kV, a CCD imaging system for image acquisition with a Gatan 832 camera (Gatan, Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA), and a cryo-transfer holder (Gatan-626, Gatan, Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA) that maintained a temperature not exceeding −174 °C. The microgrid employed for sample preparation was Quantifoil 1.2/1.3 (Quantifoil Micro Tools GmbH, Jena, Germany).

3. Results

A double-tail CO2-responsive surfactant, referred to as DTS, was synthesized (Scheme S1) to study its ability to form worm-like micelles. The incorporation of CO2-responsive functional groups into the molecular structure enables this surfactant to exhibit adjustable self-assembly behavior when exposed to CO2 stimulation, which is named DTS-CO2 (Scheme 2). The presence of double hydrophobic tail chains enhances intermolecular hydrophobic interactions, which facilitates the formation of worm-like micelles and potentially improves both the stability and responsiveness of the system. This study aims to investigate the self-assembly behavior of this novel surfactant under CO2 stimulation, its capacity to form worm-like micelles, and its rheological properties.

3.1. CO2-Responsive Properties of DTS

To determine whether the DTS with terminal amine group exhibits CO2-responsive characteristics comparable to those of small-molecule primary amines, the variations in macroscopic conductivity and pH of the DTS solution during CO2 bubbling were initially analyzed. The results are presented in Figure 1. When CO2 gas was continuously bubbled into 20 mL of a 100 mM DTS aqueous solution at a constant rate of 0.1 L·min−1, the pH value decreased sharply at first, then gradually slowed and eventually stabilized at 6.42, reaching equilibrium. At the same time, the conductivity increased sharply from 3.2 μS·cm−1 and ultimately stabilized at 1586 μS·cm−1. This observation indicates that when CO2 reacts with water, it interacts with the primary amine groups in the DTS molecular structure, producing a significant number of ionized compounds. This reaction neutralizes the alkalinity of the solution, leading to a decrease in pH and an increase in conductivity. These preliminary experimental results confirm that DTS exhibits CO2-responsive characteristics. Based on the experimental data from conductivity and pH measurements, it can be concluded that DTS molecules in an aqueous solution undergo the reversible reaction illustrated in Scheme 1.
As DTS undergoes protonation by CO2, transitioning from a nonionic state to an ionic state, its hydrophilicity is significantly enhanced. The ionic headgroup and hydrophobic tail of the resulting molecule form a typical ultra-long-chain cationic surfactant. Surfactants containing double-tails have been shown to exhibit a strong ability to form worm-like micelles, making them highly effective rheological thickening agents [31]. Figure S1 shows that the critical micellular concentration (CMC) of DTS-CO2 is approximately 0.009 mM. Consequently, a 100 mM DTS solution is anticipated to form a worm-like micellar system exhibiting CO2-responsive characteristics. Figure 2 depicts the changes in the physical appearance of a 100 mM DTS solution during the introduction and subsequent removal of CO2. Before the introduction of CO2, DTS exhibits extremely poor water solubility. At low temperatures, it appears as a waxy solid suspended on the water surface, while at higher temperatures, it forms an oil film on the water surface. Upon bubbling CO2 gas into 20 mL of a 100 mM DTS solution at a rate of approximately 0.1 L·min−1 at room temperature for 2 min, the solution rapidly transitions from a biphasic system to a transparent and homogeneous viscoelastic fluid (DTS–CO2), capable of trapping bubbles for an extended duration. When N2 is introduced into the DTS–CO2 solution to displace CO2, or when the solution is exposed to air for 7 days, the viscous fluid rapidly transforms into a low-viscosity emulsion. This process is reversible and can be repeated multiple times without any loss of responsiveness.
Considering these visually significant changes, rheological methods were employed to further evaluate the CO2-responsive behavior. As illustrated in Figure 3, the steady-state rheological behavior of the DTS–CO2 solution displays Newtonian fluid characteristics at shear rates below 0.01 s−1, with an apparent viscosity reaching approximately 300,000 mPa·s, which is about 300,000 times that of pure water. When the shear rate exceeds 0.01 s−1, the solution exhibits distinct shear-thinning behavior. Furthermore, dynamic rheological results reveal that when the oscillatory shear frequency (ω) is below approximately 0.018 rad·s−1, the elastic modulus (G′) is smaller than the viscous modulus (G″), suggesting that the solution behaves predominantly as a viscous fluid. When the oscillatory shear frequency exceeds approximately 0.018 rad·s−1, G′ surpasses G″, and the solution transitions to exhibit elastic behavior. In summary, the DTS–CO2 solution exhibits pronounced viscoelastic responsiveness. Both steady-state and dynamic rheological analyses indicate that the DTS–CO2 solution contains a three-dimensional network structure formed by entangled worm-like micelles at the microscopic level. In contrast, both the DTS–air solution and the pure DTS solution exhibit typical Newtonian fluid behavior, with zero-shear viscosities (η0) of approximately 2 mPa·s, respectively, which are merely one hundred-thousandth of that of the DTS–CO2 solution. Moreover, the G′ and G″ values of these solutions are exceedingly low, rendering them challenging to measure via dynamic rheological experiments.
More importantly, the stimulus-responsive behavior of the DTS solution to CO2 and air is fully reversible, enabling its viscosity to be switched in a controllable manner by bubbling CO2 or air. As shown in Figure 4, after multiple cycles of states with or without CO2, the η0 of the solution can be fully restored to its original “on” value of 300,000 mPa·s and “off” value of 2 mPa·s. Compared to previous CO2-switchable systems, this reversible cycling process is easily achieved by bubbling CO2 or air at room temperature, eliminating the need for deliberate heating or the use of inert gases such as nitrogen or argon. This system is economically viable, environmentally friendly, and energy-efficient.
To gain a deeper understanding of the microscopic micellar structures within the solution, Cryo-TEM was utilized to examine the DTS–CO2 solution. As depicted in Figure 2, high-density worm-like micelles are distinctly observed in the DTS–CO2 solution. These micelles exhibit diameters of several nanometers and lengths extending to hundreds of nanometers. The three-dimensional network structure, formed by the entanglement of these worm-like micelles, is responsible for the solution’s exceptional rheological viscoelasticity. In summary, a CO2-air switchable worm-like micellar system has been successfully constructed based on DTS.

3.2. Factors Affecting the Rheological Properties of Worm-like Micelles

To comprehensively examine the influence of environmental factors and various conditions on the rheological properties of the solution, a series of experiments were performed. Initially, an experiment focusing on CO2 bubbling time was conducted to investigate the dynamic evolution of solution viscosity over time during CO2 introduction. The results demonstrated that the viscosity increased rapidly with the degree of protonation until it eventually reached a stable state. Furthermore, additional experiments examined the viscoelastic stability of the solution under varying conditions, such as changes in concentration, temperature, and pressure.

3.2.1. CO2 Sparging Time

Figure 5 illustrates the relationship between zero-shear viscosity and time for a 100 mM aqueous solution of DTS (20 mL), with CO2 gas sparged in at a constant rate of approximately 0.1 L·min−1 for varying durations. The viscosity of the solution increases exponentially as the CO2 bubbling time extends. After around 60 s, the viscosity reaches its peak value, and the system attains equilibrium. This suggests that within the initial 0–60 s, CO2 bubbling induces the protonation of DTS molecules, converting them into long-chain cationic surfactants. As the bubbling time increases, the concentration of cationic surfactants in the system rises correspondingly. The viscosity of worm-like micelle solutions generally follows an exponential relationship with the concentration of surfactants. When the CO2 bubbling time reaches 60 s, nearly all DTS molecules in the system have completely reacted, and the concentration of surfactants remains constant. As a result, the viscosity of the solution stabilizes, mirroring the trends observed for pH and conductivity (Figure 1). The viscosity of a 100 mM DTS solution can reach 105 mPa·s, whereas conventional surfactant solutions at a concentration of 300 mM only achieve a viscosity of 103 mPa·s [23]. This clearly highlights the advantage of the double-tail structure utilized in the molecular design of DTS.

3.2.2. Concentration of DTS

Figure 6 illustrates the rheological properties of DTS aqueous solutions at various concentrations after CO2 was introduced to saturation under room temperature conditions. The steady-state rheological curves in Figure 6A indicate that at a concentration of 5 mM, the solution exhibits typical Newtonian fluid behavior. At a concentration of 8 mM, the solution begins to exhibit shear-thinning behavior. With increasing concentration, the Newtonian viscosity plateau rises gradually while the critical shear rate for the onset of shear thinning decreases. This suggests that an entangled network structure forms within the system, with higher surfactant concentrations resulting in denser networks. These denser networks are more susceptible to shear strain, leading to the realignment of worm-like micelles along the direction of the shear stress field. The dynamic rheology results (Figure 6B) demonstrate that all samples exhibit pronounced viscoelasticity. At a concentration of 80 mM, the G′ and G″ intersect at approximately 0.3 rad·s−1. At a concentration of 100 mM, G′ and G″ do not intersect within the measured frequency range, and G′ consistently remains higher than G″, indicating gel-like rheological behavior.
Figure 6 provides the basis for deriving the rheological parameters of DTS–CO2 solutions as a function of surfactant concentration, which are presented in Figure 7. The variation of η0 with concentration. The η0–C curve can be distinctly divided into two regions by a turning point. The concentration at this turning point represents the critical overlap concentration (C∗) of the DTS–CO2 worm-like micellar system, showing a value of 80 mM. In the dilute solution region (C < C∗), η0 increases linearly with concentration, following Einstein’s viscosity equation. In the semi-dilute solution region (C > C∗), η0 exhibits a proportional relationship with concentration, following η0~C. The increase in these rheological parameters is primarily attributed to the elongation of worm-like micelles. With increasing surfactant concentration, the length and flexibility of worm-like micelles gradually increase, leading to a denser network structure.

3.2.3. Pressure and Temperature

The DTS–CO2 solution exhibits high viscosity under a CO2 atmosphere, with its potential application being the sealing and plugging of CO2 in geological formations. However, the pressure in geological formations is typically very high. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the thickening behavior of the DTS solution under high CO2 pressure, such as 10 atm CO2 atmosphere. The rheological behavior of the DTS–CO2 solution was analyzed in a sealed CO2 atmosphere using a high-pressure closed rheological system. Figure 8 illustrates the steady-state rheological curves of the DTS–CO2 solution under varying pressures within a sealed CO2 environment. A comparison with the curves obtained in an open environment reveals that the η0 of the system increases slightly in the sealed environment, though the increase is not statistically significant. Moreover, increasing the environmental pressure does not result in any further changes in η0. This finding suggests that the DTS–CO2 solution demonstrates greater stability in a CO2 atmosphere while remaining unaffected by pressure, further confirming its sensitivity to air exposure.
Figure 9 illustrates the variation in the apparent viscosity of the DTS–CO2 solution as a function of temperature. In an open environment, the viscosity decreases rapidly as the temperature increases. At approximately 55 °C, the viscosity reaches its minimum value, which is comparable to that of pure water. Further increases in temperature result in negligible changes in viscosity. In contrast, under a 10 atm CO2 atmosphere, the solution’s viscosity exhibits slight fluctuations with increasing temperature but remains above 100,000 mPa·s across the temperature range of 25–120 °C. This comparison highlights the excellent thermal stability of the DTS–CO2 solution in a CO2 atmosphere.

4. Conclusions

This study reports the design and synthesis of a CO2-responsive double-tailed surfactant, DTS, and examines its capacity to form worm-like micelles under CO2 stimulation, along with its rheological properties. The findings indicate that DTS molecules undergo protonation when exposed to CO2, which significantly enhances their hydrophilicity and leads to the formation of ultra-long-chain cationic surfactants. These surfactants self-assemble into worm-like micelles and exhibit notable rheological viscoelasticity. Specifically, the zero-shear viscosity of the DTS–CO2 solution is approximately 300,000 mPa·s, which is 300,000 times higher than that of pure water. In contrast, the DTS–air solution and pure DTS solution exhibit η0 values of only 2 mPa·s. The system exhibits excellent thermal stability, maintaining a viscosity above 100,000 mPa·s within a temperature range of 25–120 °C under a CO2 atmosphere. It also shows high sensitivity to CO2 concentration, surfactant concentration, and bubbling time. Moreover, the system allows a reversible transition between high-viscosity and low-viscosity states through the bubbling of CO2 or air, with no observable loss of responsiveness after multiple cycles. The critical overlap concentration of the DTS–CO2 worm-like micellar solution is found to be 80 mM. At higher concentrations, the solution exhibits shear-thinning behavior and pronounced viscoelasticity.
Compared to existing CO2-responsive systems, the DTS–CO2 system offers simplicity, environmental friendliness, and cost-effectiveness, as it does not require heating or inert gases for reversibility. These characteristics make it a promising candidate for applications in smart materials, enhanced oil recovery, and other areas where tunable rheological properties are essential. The study offers valuable insights into the development of advanced functional materials that leverage CO2 responsiveness.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma18040902/s1, Scheme S1. Preparation Steps for CO2-Responsive DTS Surfactants; Figure S1. The I1/I3 values obtained by fluorescence spectroscopy as a function of DTS–CO2 concentration at 25 °C.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, M.Z. and M.M.; formal analysis, investigation, data curation, H.H. and R.C.; writing—review and editing, M.Z.; visualization, R.C.; supervision, M.Z. and M.M.; project administration, M.Z.; funding acquisition, F.L. and X.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Sinopec Key Laboratory of Drilling Completion and Fracturing of Shale Oil and Gas (36650000-23-ZC0607-0061), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22472110, U23B2085), and the State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering (sklpme2022-2-09).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Fanghui Liu and Meng Mu was employed by the Sinopec. Author Huiyu Huang is employed by CNOOC Institute of Chemicals & Advanced Materials (Beijing) Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, H.; Lin, Z.; Chen, Z.; Cui, Z.; Song, B. Wormlike micellar solutions formed by an anionic surfactant and a cationic surfactant with two head groups. Soft Matter 2024, 20, 978–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gupta, R.R.; Daneshi, M.; Frigaard, I.; Elfring, G. Shear layers and plugs in the capillary flow of wormlike micellar gels. Soft Matter 2024, 20, 4715–4733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yu, H.; Xu, Z.; Wang, D.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Z.; Yin, Q.; Li, Y. Intracellular pH-activated PEG-b-PDPA wormlike micelles for hydrophobic drug delivery. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 5052–5055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zeng, L.; Zou, L.; Yu, H.; He, X.; Cao, H.; Zhang, Z.; Yin, Q.; Zhang, P.; Gu, W.; Chen, L.; et al. Treatment of malignant brain tumor by tumor-triggered programmed wormlike micelles with precise targeting and deep penetration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 4201–4212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McCoy, T.M.; Valiakhmetova, A.; Pottage, M.J.; Garvey, C.J.; de Campo, L.; Rehm, C.; Kuryashov, D.A.; Tabor, R.F. Structural evolution of wormlike micellar fluids formed by erucyl amidopropyl betaine with oil, salts, and surfactants. Langmuir 2016, 32, 12423–12433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Du, D.; Pu, W.; Chen, B.; Varfolomeev, M.A.; Liu, R. Experimental study on EOR potential of water-in-oil emulsion via CO2/N2 triggered wormlike micelle solution. Fuel 2021, 288, 119639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Numin, M.S.; Jumbri, K.; Ramli, A.; Borhan, N. Microemulsion rheological analysis of alkaline, surfactant, and polymer in oil-water interface. Processes 2020, 8, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shi, H.; Wang, Y.; Fang, B.; Talmon, Y.; Ge, W.; Raghavan, S.R.; Zakin, J.L. Light-Responsive Threadlike Micelles as Drag Reducing Fluids with Enhanced Heat-Transfer Capabilities. Langmuir 2011, 27, 5806–5813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Souza, R.N.; Duarte, L.G.T.A.; Jora, M.Z.; Atvars, T.D.Z.; Sabadini, E. Thermal behavior of wormlike micelles under turbulent and quiescent regimes. Colloids Surf. A 2020, 603, 125271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, W.; Liu, F.; Liu, D.; Chen, F.; Wei, J. Energy analysis of a surfactant micelle’s deformation by coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2019, 202, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yan, Z.; Dai, C.; Zhao, M.; Zhao, G.; Li, Y.; Wu, X.; Du, M.; Liu, Y. pH-switchable wormlike micelle formation by N-alkyl-N-methylpyrrolidinium bromide-based cationic surfactant. Colloids Surf. A 2015, 482, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, P.; Pei, X.; Li, C.; Li, R.; Chen, Z.; Song, B.; Cui, Z.; Xie, D. pH-switchable wormlike micelles with high viscoelasticity formed by pseudo-oligomeric surfactants. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 334, 116499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Han, Y.; Chu, Z.; He, S.; Zhang, J.; Feng, Y. Thermally induced structural transitions from fluids to hydrogels with pH-switchable anionic wormlike micelles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 394, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Patel, T.; Jain, M.; Kumar, S.; Kasoju, N.; Kumar, S.; Aswal, V.K.; Seoud, O.E.; Malek, N. Light responsive microstructural transitions in photo-responsive wormlike micelle mediated viscoelastic material based on cationic surfactant and photo-responsive organic acids. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 394, 123798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bi, Y.; Wang, T.; Xiao, J.; Yu, L. Wormlike micelles with photo and pH dual-stimuli-responsive behaviors formed by aqueous mixture of cationic and anionic surfactants. Colloids Surf. A 2023, 668, 131441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Y.; Kong, W.; Wang, C.; An, P.; Fang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Qin, Z.; Liu, X. Switching wormlike micelles of selenium-containing surfactant using redox reaction. Soft Matter 2015, 11, 7469–7473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, T.; Zheng, X.; Huang, M.; Zhou, X.; Chen, S.; Zhang, H. Preparation and response behaviour of wormlike micelles in response to CO2 stimulation. Colloids Surf. A 2024, 685, 133072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Y.; Jessop, P.G.; Cunningham, M.; Eckert, C.A.; Liotta, C.L. Switchable surfactants. Science 2006, 313, 958–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lin, S.; Theato, P. CO2-responsive polymers. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2013, 34, 1118–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jessop, P.G.; Mercer, S.M.; Heldebrant, D.J. CO2-triggered switchable solvents, surfactants, and other materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7240–7253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Wang, J.; He, S.; Guo, Z.; Chu, Z.; Dreiss, C.A. CO2-switchable wormlike micelles. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 4902–4904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Su, X.; Cunningham, M.F.; Jessop, P.G. Switchable viscosity triggered by CO2 using smart worm-like micelles. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 2655–2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xia, W.; He, X.; Zhang, D.; Su, X. CO2-responsive wormlike micelles based on pseudo-tetrameric surfactant. Molecules 2022, 27, 7922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Greaves, T.L.; Drummond, C.J. Solvent nanostructure, the solvophobic effect and amphiphile self-assembly in ionic liquids. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 1096–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, H.; Wang, J.; Yang, S.; Zhang, W. Aggregate conformation and rheological properties of didodecyldimethylammonium bromide in aqueous solution. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2010, 31, 650–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gonçalves, R.A.; Lam, Y.; Lindman, B. Double-chain cationic surfactants: Swelling, structure, phase transitions and additive effects. Molecules 2021, 26, 3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cui, Z.; Yang, L.; Cui, Y.; Binks, B.P. Effects of surfactant structure on the phase inversion of emulsions stabilized by mixtures of silica nanoparticles and cationic surfactant. Langmuir 2010, 26, 4717–4724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Biswal, N.R.; Paria, S. Wetting of PTFE and glass surfaces by aqueous solutions of cationic and anionic double-chain surfactants. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 10172–10178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Heinz, H.; Pramanik, C.; Heinz, O.; Ding, Y.; Mishra, R.K.; Marchon, D.; Flatt, R.J.; Estrela-Lopis, I.; Llop, J.; Moya, S.; et al. Nanoparticle decoration with surfactants: Molecular interactions, assembly, and applications. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2017, 72, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Veeralakshmi, S.; Sabapathi, G.; Nehru, S.; Venuvanalingam, P.; Arunachalam, S. Surfactant–cobalt (III) complexes: The impact of hydrophobicity on interaction with HSA and DNA–insights from experimental and theoretical approach. Colloids Surf. B 2017, 153, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, Z.; Bi, Z.; Li, H.; Pei, X.; Chen, Z.; Cui, Z.; Song, B. Wormlike micellar glycerol solutions formed from a double-tailed surfactant with two quaternary ammonium head groups. Langmuir 2024, 40, 19954–19963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Reversible reaction of tertiary amines with CO2 in water.
Scheme 1. Reversible reaction of tertiary amines with CO2 in water.
Materials 18 00902 sch001
Scheme 2. Reversible reaction of DTS with CO2.
Scheme 2. Reversible reaction of DTS with CO2.
Materials 18 00902 sch002
Figure 1. Conductivity and pH values of 100 mM DTS solution change with increasing bubbling CO2 time.
Figure 1. Conductivity and pH values of 100 mM DTS solution change with increasing bubbling CO2 time.
Materials 18 00902 g001
Figure 2. (Upper) Appearance of 100 mM DTS solution after bubbling CO2 and removing CO2 with N2; (Lower) The Cryo-TEM image of worm-like micelles based on 100 mM DTS with CO2 at 25 °C.
Figure 2. (Upper) Appearance of 100 mM DTS solution after bubbling CO2 and removing CO2 with N2; (Lower) The Cryo-TEM image of worm-like micelles based on 100 mM DTS with CO2 at 25 °C.
Materials 18 00902 g002
Figure 3. Steady and dynamic rheology of 100 mM DTS-CO2 solution at 25 °C.
Figure 3. Steady and dynamic rheology of 100 mM DTS-CO2 solution at 25 °C.
Materials 18 00902 g003
Figure 4. Zero-shear viscosity (η0) of the 100 mM DTS solution measured during the repeated cycles of bubbling CO2 and N2 at 25 °C. The solid data points represent the conductivity when CO2 is introduced, while the hollow data points represent the conductivity when N2 is introduced.
Figure 4. Zero-shear viscosity (η0) of the 100 mM DTS solution measured during the repeated cycles of bubbling CO2 and N2 at 25 °C. The solid data points represent the conductivity when CO2 is introduced, while the hollow data points represent the conductivity when N2 is introduced.
Materials 18 00902 g004
Figure 5. Zero-shear viscosity of 20 mL of a 100 mM DTS solution changes with the time of sparging CO2 at a flow rate of 0.1 L/min.
Figure 5. Zero-shear viscosity of 20 mL of a 100 mM DTS solution changes with the time of sparging CO2 at a flow rate of 0.1 L/min.
Materials 18 00902 g005
Figure 6. Steady (A) and dynamic (B) rheology of DTS–CO2 solutions with different concentrations at 25 °C.
Figure 6. Steady (A) and dynamic (B) rheology of DTS–CO2 solutions with different concentrations at 25 °C.
Materials 18 00902 g006
Figure 7. Effect of DTS–CO2 concentrations on zero–shear viscosity (η0) at 25 °C.
Figure 7. Effect of DTS–CO2 concentrations on zero–shear viscosity (η0) at 25 °C.
Materials 18 00902 g007
Figure 8. Steady rheology of 100 mM DTS–CO2 solution under different pressures and situations.
Figure 8. Steady rheology of 100 mM DTS–CO2 solution under different pressures and situations.
Materials 18 00902 g008
Figure 9. Zero-shear viscosity of 100 mM DTS–CO2 solution changes with increasing temperature at a fixed shear rate of 0.005 s−1.
Figure 9. Zero-shear viscosity of 100 mM DTS–CO2 solution changes with increasing temperature at a fixed shear rate of 0.005 s−1.
Materials 18 00902 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, F.; Huang, H.; Zhang, M.; Mu, M.; Chen, R.; Su, X. CO2-Responsive Worm-like Micelle Based on Double-Tailed Surfactant. Materials 2025, 18, 902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18040902

AMA Style

Liu F, Huang H, Zhang M, Mu M, Chen R, Su X. CO2-Responsive Worm-like Micelle Based on Double-Tailed Surfactant. Materials. 2025; 18(4):902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18040902

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Fanghui, Huiyu Huang, Mingmin Zhang, Meng Mu, Rui Chen, and Xin Su. 2025. "CO2-Responsive Worm-like Micelle Based on Double-Tailed Surfactant" Materials 18, no. 4: 902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18040902

APA Style

Liu, F., Huang, H., Zhang, M., Mu, M., Chen, R., & Su, X. (2025). CO2-Responsive Worm-like Micelle Based on Double-Tailed Surfactant. Materials, 18(4), 902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18040902

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop