Next Article in Journal
Numerical Study to Evaluate the Flexural Performance of Concrete Beams Tensile Reinforced with Fe-Based Shape Memory Alloy Rebar According to Heating Temperature
Previous Article in Journal
Recrystallization Behavior of Cold-Rolled AA5083 Microalloyed with 0.1 wt.% Sc and 0.08 wt.% Zr
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

1.5 GPa Grade High-Strength Steel Sheet Flattening by Roll Gap Adjustment Considering Pattern Roll Effects

1
Department of Mechanical Design Engineering, Hanyang University, 55, Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangrok-gu, Ansan 15588, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea
2
2BK21 FOUR ERICA-ACE Center, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea
3
ASAN Co., Ltd., Pureundeulpan-ro 826-4, Paltan-Myun, Hwasung 18525, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(8), 1702; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18081702
Submission received: 8 March 2025 / Revised: 26 March 2025 / Accepted: 2 April 2025 / Published: 9 April 2025

Abstract

This study analyzes a three-stage roll flattening process to improve the flatness of 1.5 GPa grade AHSS sheets. Unlike conventional leveler rolls, which mainly relieve residual stress through longitudinal tension-compression, the second roll has a sloped pattern to induce transverse deformation and redistribute local residual stresses. A twisted sheet was processed under different roll gap settings (1.3 mm, 1.1 mm, 0.9 mm, and 0.7 mm), and experimental measurements were compared with Abaqus Explicit simulations. At a 1.1 mm gap, the RMSE between experiment and simulation is 0.22 mm, showing the highest agreement. Both twist and crossbow defects are reduced by over 80%, achieving optimal flattening. At 1.3 mm, the simulation overestimates the second roll’s effect, causing excessive localized deformation. Reducing the gap to 0.9 mm or 0.7 mm increases discrepancies due to roll fixation differences. Experiments allow more central bending, amplifying crossbow, while simulations assume rigid rolls, underestimating curvature. Adjusting the second roll’s geometry to enhance transverse tension-compression and setting the gap to 1.1 mm effectively reduces defects. This method improves flatness while minimizing the number of rolls needed in high-strength steel sheet production.
Keywords: advanced high-strength steel; flattening; finite element analysis; roll gap optimization advanced high-strength steel; flattening; finite element analysis; roll gap optimization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeon, Y.; Jeong, K.; Kim, G.-h.; Yoon, J. 1.5 GPa Grade High-Strength Steel Sheet Flattening by Roll Gap Adjustment Considering Pattern Roll Effects. Materials 2025, 18, 1702. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18081702

AMA Style

Jeon Y, Jeong K, Kim G-h, Yoon J. 1.5 GPa Grade High-Strength Steel Sheet Flattening by Roll Gap Adjustment Considering Pattern Roll Effects. Materials. 2025; 18(8):1702. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18081702

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeon, Youngjin, Kyucheol Jeong, Geun-ho Kim, and Jonghun Yoon. 2025. "1.5 GPa Grade High-Strength Steel Sheet Flattening by Roll Gap Adjustment Considering Pattern Roll Effects" Materials 18, no. 8: 1702. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18081702

APA Style

Jeon, Y., Jeong, K., Kim, G.-h., & Yoon, J. (2025). 1.5 GPa Grade High-Strength Steel Sheet Flattening by Roll Gap Adjustment Considering Pattern Roll Effects. Materials, 18(8), 1702. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18081702

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop