Next Article in Journal
Taper Function for Pinus nigra in Central Italy: Is a More Complex Computational System Required?
Next Article in Special Issue
Biomass Allocation into Woody Parts and Foliage in Young Common Aspen (Populus tremula L.)—Trees and a Stand-Level Study in the Western Carpathians
Previous Article in Journal
Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Community Forest Management: Evolution and Limitations in Mexican Forest Law, Policy and Practice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Small-Scale Forest Structure Influences Spatial Variability of Belowground Carbon Fluxes in a Mature Mediterranean Beech Forest
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/f11040404
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Net Primary Productivity of Pinus massoniana Dependence on Climate, Soil and Forest Characteristics

by
Xin Huang
1,
Chunbo Huang
2,
Mingjun Teng
1,
Zhixiang Zhou
1,* and
Pengcheng Wang
1
1
College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences/Hubei Engineering Technology Research Center for Forestry Information, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2020, 11(4), 404; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040404
Submission received: 4 January 2020 / Revised: 9 March 2020 / Accepted: 2 April 2020 / Published: 4 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Growth and Allocation of Woody Biomass in Forest Trees Based on Environmental Conditions)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Understanding the spatial variation of forest productivity and its driving factors on a large regional scale can help reveal the response mechanism of tree growth to climate change, and is an important prerequisite for efficient forest management and studying regional and global carbon cycles. Pinus massoniana Lamb. is a major planted tree species in southern China, playing an important role in the development of forestry due to its high economic and ecological benefits. Here, we establish a biomass database for P. massoniana, including stems, branches, leaves, roots, aboveground organs and total tree, by collecting the published literature, to increase our understanding of net primary productivity (NPP) geographical trends for each tree component and their influencing factors across the entire geographical distribution of the species in southern China. P. massoniana NPP ranges from 1.04 to 13.13 Mg·ha−1·year−1, with a mean value of 5.65 Mg·ha−1·year−1. The NPP of both tree components (i.e., stem, branch, leaf, root, aboveground organs, and total tree) show no clear relationships with longitude and elevation, but an inverse relationship with latitude (p < 0.01). Linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) are employed to analyze the effect of environmental factors and stand characteristics on P. massoniana NPP. LMM results reveal that the NPP of different tree components have different sensitivities to environmental and stand variables. Appropriate temperature and soil nutrients (particularly soil available phosphorus) are beneficial to biomass accumulation of this species. It is worth noting that the high temperature in July and August (HTWM) is a significant climate stressor across the species geographical distribution and is not restricted to marginal populations in the low latitude area. Temperature was a key environmental factor behind the inverse latitudinal trends of P. massoniana NPP, because it showed a higher sensitivity than other factors. In the context of climate warming and nitrogen (N) deposition, the inhibition effect caused by high temperatures and the lack or imbalance of soil nutrients, particularly soil phosphorus, should be paid more attention in the future. These findings advance our understanding about the factors influencing the productivity of each P. massoniana tree component across the full geographical distribution of the species, and are therefore valuable for forecasting climate-induced variation in forest productivity.

1. Introduction

Forest ecosystems are a major component of the terrestrial ecosystem worldwide and play an irreplaceable role in regulating global carbon balances and mitigating atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases, as well as in biodiversity and water conservation [1,2]. Forest biomass is the total amount of organic matter formed by CO2 sequestration in the process of photosynthesis per unit area, and its accumulation rate is usually used as an indicator of forest productivity [3]. Therefore, forest biomass and productivity are important for measuring carbon sequestration ability and assessing carbon balance of forest ecosystems, and play an important role in global carbon cycle research [4]. Since the industrial revolution in the mid-20th century, the rapid development of human activities and modern industry, especially the burning of fossil fuels, massive deforestation, and grassland reclamation, have had a tremendous impact on the global ecosystem [5]. Therefore, studies on the environmental response of forest productivity in the context of global climate change, such as atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition, elevated CO2 concentration, and climate warming, have received increasing attention because of their great practical significance for reducing carbon emissions and mitigating global warming [6,7].
The production, allocation, and turnover of forest carbon on a large regional scale has received considerable attention in the past and is becoming increasingly important [8]. The accurate assessment of forest productivity on a large regional scale and the understanding of its influencing factors can provide a theoretical basis for enhancing forest productivity and studying the terrestrial carbon cycle [9]. Because of the complex terrain and large environmental differences in China, the geographical distribution of forest biomass and productivity is diverse [10,11,12]. As an important component of forest resources in China, plantations play an increasingly prominent role in maintaining the global carbon balance and mitigating global warming [13]. As artificially regulated ecosystems, the carbon sequestration function of plantation ecosystems is directly or indirectly affected by tree species, afforestation strategies, and tending operations [14]. Most large-scale studies on biomass and productivity have been conducted for a variety of forest types in China, rather than for a particular tree species, although many of these forests are single-species plantations [15]. Research on the response of forest productivity to environmental factors at the tree species level can reveal species-specific ecophysiological characteristics. On this basis, more targeted forest management strategies (e.g., site selection for afforestation and selection of tree species for close-to-nature transformation of monospecific plantations) could be proposed for different tree species in different regions, especially for major planted tree species, to improve forest productivity and carbon storage [15,16].
In the past 20 years, China has implemented a series of ecological projects, such as the Grain-to-Green Program, to improve the situation of low forest coverage and poor forest resources, and has now become the country with the largest area of plantations [17]. Pinus massoniana Lamb. is widely distributed in subtropical areas of China. It is an important afforestation tree species in barren mountains owing to its strong adaptability, fast growth, high yield, and drought tolerance, and is also one of the most representative forest types in China [18]. As one of the major planted and native tree species in southern China, P. massoniana has made a great contribution to plantation development [13,15]. The eighth forest resources inventory of China published by the State Forestry Administration in 2014 showed that the total area and volume of P. massoniana were 1.0 × 107 ha and 5.9 × 108 m3, respectively, accounting for 6.1% and 4.0% of the total area and volume of arbor forests in China. However, P. massoniana plantations are faced with the problems of their irrational structure, poor stability and degraded productivity. Therefore, seeking scientific ways of regulating its productivity to improve its ecological and economic benefits is a major concern. Studies on biomass and productivity of P. massoniana began in the early 1980s [19], and mainly focused on biomass estimation and its allocation patterns in different site conditions, stand ages and densities [20], allometric equations research [21] and the effect of species mixtures on biomass [22]. In general, the research objectives of the above-mentioned studies mainly focused on quantitative assessment of biomass, and few studies involved biomass accumulation rate, which is usually quantified by forest productivity [23]. Therefore, knowledge about productivity responses to environmental factors is underdeveloped. Moreover, although tree-ring chronologies have been widely used to explore the relationship between climate and P. massoniana tree growth [24], these experiments have been carried out in individual study sites on a local scale, and the variation in productivity and its environmental control on a regional scale is still unclear. In addition, biotic factors, such as tree age and density, also influence forest productivity [25]. The variable environmental factors (e.g., temperature, precipitation, and soil properties) and forest characteristics (e.g., stand age and density) within the P. massoniana distribution area offers an opportunity to examine its productivity distribution patterns and its influencing factors on a large regional scale.
Numerous quantitative evaluations in the form of meta-analyses have been carried out to explore forest productivity and its influencing factors [26,27]. A lot of field measurements of P. massoniana biomass and productivity estimations have been conducted at multiple sites over the past four decades. However, these data were mostly published in Chinese journals and reports and are not accessible to non-Chinese scientists [27]. A P. massoniana biomass database could promote the completion of the established biomass database for China’s forests and contribute to generating a huge database worldwide that will aid in the validation of ecosystem models, improving our understanding of the global carbon cycle and accurately evaluating carbon storage [26].
In this study, we established a biomass database for P. massoniana, including stems, branches, leaves, roots, aboveground organs, and total tree values by collecting data from the published literature, to increase our understanding of the geographical trends of P. massoniana net primary productivity (NPP) and its influencing factors across the full geographical distribution of the species in southern China. Our objectives were: (1) to document the spatial distribution of P. massoniana NPP on a large regional scale, (2) to quantify the effects of environmental factors (climate and soil variables) and stand characteristics on NPP of each tree component (i.e., stem, branch, leaf, root, aboveground organs and total tree), and (3) to identify the key environmental factors causing spatial heterogeneity in P. massoniana NPP.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Collection and Treatments

Our P. massoniana biomass database was generated by collecting published data (Figure 1, Table S1). To compile a comprehensive database, we searched the Web of Science for English literature and China National Knowledge Internet for Chinese literature. To minimize the variability associated with comparing biomass/productivity estimates derived from different methodologies, we selected all references included in the database that (1) included data actually measured in field experiments on P. massoniana stands (not forest inventory data or remote sensing based studies), (2) did not contain severe anthropogenic disturbances, such as close-to-nature transformation, irrigation, and harvest and (3) only included measurements of monospecific stands of P. massoniana; data on mixed stands was excluded. P. massoniana growth is affected by competition with other tree species in mixed stands [22]. The different types of species interactions formed depending on tree species composition, stand age, afforestation density and site conditions bring uncertainties to the evaluation of functions and services of forest ecosystems, including productivity [28]. Moreover, we only selected studies that were (4) derived from stable growing communities (data from stands younger than three years old was excluded), and (5) contained at least one of the following biomass data at the stand level: stem, branch, leaf, root, sum of aboveground organs or total tree. Studies on allometric scaling among biomass components of P. massoniana have focused primarily on the individual tree level [21]. However, forest NPP can only be estimated at the stand level [29]. All biomass data were converted to common units (Mg·ha−1) prior to analysis. We retrieved missing latitude or longitude information for 16 sites without such data from Google Earth according to the site name [27]. Elevation information not provided in the literature was obtained based on the longitude, latitude of the sampling sites and a 1 km resolution Digital Elevation Model obtained from Cold and Arid Regions Sciences Data Center at Lanzhou (http://westdc.westgis.ac.cn/). A total of 87 references were acquired after screening (Figure 1, Table S1).
Most of the literature only include biomass data and NPP data was rarely provided. Therefore, a uniform formula was used to estimate productivity based on biomass and stand age to enhance data comparability between different studies. NPP is the rate of production of biomass and organic compounds by the plant or ecosystem and consists of three components [23]:
NPP = ∆Y + ∆L + ∆G,
where ∆Y is the growth increment in a specified time interval (usually 1 year) estimated from temporal changes in forest biomass, ∆L is the loss part, consists of the death and litterfall production, and ∆G is the rate of grazing by herbivores. The full suite of components of NPP is rarely measured in forest ecosystems, owing to the difficulty of measuring ∆L and ∆G. Considering the large amount of missing data for these two components in the literature, the NPP of total tree (NPPtree) includes aboveground and belowground NPP and is the sum of four compartments in this study:
NPPtree = NPPstem + NPPbra + NPPleaf + NPProot,
where NPPstem, NPPbra, NPPleaf and NPProot are the annual net increments of stems (including bark), branches, leaves, and roots, respectively. Moreover, NPP of aboveground organs (NPPag) is the sum of NPPs from stems, branches, and leaves:
NPPag = NPPstem + NPPbra + NPPleaf,
To simplify our analysis, in this study we did not consider carbon allocations to fruits, flowers and exudates.

2.2. Influencing Factors

2.2.1. Soil Data and Stand Characteristics

We collected soil data including alkali-hydrolysable nitrogen (AN, mg/kg), available phosphorus (AP, mg/kg), available potassium (AK, mg/kg), bulk density (BD, g/cm3), soil organic matter (SOM, g/kg) and pH from the China Dataset of Soil Properties for Land Surface Modeling provided by Cold and Arid Regions Sciences Data Center at Lanzhou (http://westdc.westgis.ac.cn/). The data were obtained from the second national soil survey with a resolution of 1 km.
Stand characteristics used in this study involve stand density and age extracted from the literature.

2.2.2. Climatic Variables

Climatic factors used in this study included mean annual temperature (MAT, °C), mean annual precipitation (MAP, mm), mean high temperatures in warm months (HTWM, °C), and mean low temperatures in cold months (LTCM, °C). HTWM and LTCM were used to explore the effects of high and low temperatures on P. massoniana NPP, because the accumulation of forest biomass in different study sites is influenced by environmental factors over a relatively long period of time rather than a temporary time [30,31]. For the study area, July and August were warm months, and December was the cold month, as determined by frequency statistics of the months when the annual maximum and minimum temperatures occurred from 1981 to 2010 (Figure 2). Several study sites were located far from meteorological stations, and have different biomass accumulation stages. Therefore, spatially-interpolated climate data within the same observational period (1981–2015) was used. MAT and MAP data (1981–2015) were extracted from a China climate dataset (1 km resolution) provided by the Data Center for Resources and Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (http://www.resdc.cn). Monthly HTWM and LTCM from 1981 to 2015 were obtained from China National Meteorological Information Center (http://data.cma.cn/) and interpolated into 1 km grid cells employing the kriging method. Spatial data was interpolated with ArcGIS 10.2 software.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

We performed a descriptive statistical analysis to determine the distribution and variability of the NPP for P. massoniana forests, and fitted the distribution and variability curves with Gaussian functions. To stabilize heteroscedasticity and improve model R-square values in linear regression, all variables were transformed using the natural logarithm (i.e., ln(xi)) prior to analysis. Pearson correlation analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between the NPP of each P. massoniana component and site conditions (longitude, latitude, and elevation). The same approach was used to estimate the relationship between environmental factors and site conditions. All statistical analyses above were performed with SPSS (version 20, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
The linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) were employed to analyze the effect of environmental factors and stand characteristics on P. massoniana NPP. To find the best models for our data we first built a full mixed-effects model containing all of the potential explanatory variables. Based on previous studies [25,26,27], soil variables (i.e., AN, AP, AK, BD, SOM, and pH), climate variables (i.e., MAT, MAP, HTWM, and LTCM), and stand characteristics (stand age and density), which were not highly correlated were checked by a correlation matrix and selected as potential explanatory variables. The twelve potential explanatory variables were set as fixed-effect terms and study sites were set as random-effect terms, to account for site-specific effects, such as forest management and microsite. Based on the full model, in each analysis, we constructed a set of candidate models that included different combinations of potential explanatory variables, in which we also included the null model with all fixed effects deleted [32]. Models were compared using the Akaike Information Criterion corrected for small samples (AICc). The best-performing model with the lowest AICc was selected as the final model. LMMs were performed using the package “lmerTest” [33] in R software (version 3.6.1) [34]. The model performance was evaluated by the “MuMIn” package [35], in which AICc, marginal R-square (variance explained by fixed factors) and conditional R-square (variance explained by both fixed and random factors) were calculated [36]. In addition, a regression analysis was performed to analyse the relationships between key environmental factors and NPP based on the results of LMMs.

3. Results

3.1. Variability of P. mansoniana Distribution and NPP

P. massoniana components exhibited large NPP variation across sampling sites (Figure 1, Table 1), ranging from 0.29 to 8.71, 0.10 to 2.11, 0.02 to 2.31, 0.07 to 2.11, 0.88 to 10.81, and 1.04 to 13.13 Mg·ha−1·year−1 for stems, branches, leaves, roots, aboveground organs and total tree, respectively, with mean values of 3.51, 0.69, 0.34, 0.81, 4.53, 5.65 Mg·ha−1·year−1, respectively (Figure 3).
In this study, P. massoniana geographical distribution covered 11 provinces in southern China and the full geographical distribution of the species was well represented in our database (Figure 1 and Figure 4a). P. massoniana study sites ranged from 25 to 1357 m of elevation, and most sample sites were set in the regions below 1000 m (Figure 4b). NPPstem, NPPbra, NPPleaf, NPProot, NPPag, and NPPtree showed no clear relationships with longitude and elevation, but significant latitudinal trends (p < 0.01, Table 2).

3.2. Factors Influencing NPP of Different P. massoniana Components

P. massoniana NPPstem, NPPbra, NPPleaf, NPProot, NPPag, and NPPtree exhibited different sensitivities to environmental factors and stand characteristics (Table 3). NPPstem was significantly positively correlated with MAT, age, density, AP, SOM and BD, but significantly negatively correlated with HTWM. NPPbra was significantly positively correlated with MAP and density. NPPleaf was significantly positively correlated with MAP, but significantly negatively correlated with age. NPProot was significantly positively correlated with BD, age, and density. NPPag significantly increased with MAT, age, and density. NPPtree significantly increased with BD, stand age, and density, but significantly decreased with HTWM.

3.3. Relationship between Site Conditions and Environmental Factors

P. massoniana NPPs showed significant trends in latitude, rather than in longitude and elevation (Table 2), therefore the trend of environmental variables in latitude was described minutely here, which was necessary to further explore the cause of formation of the spatial heterogeneity of P. massoniana NPP. MAT, LTCM, and MAP were significantly negatively correlated with latitude (p < 0.01), with correlation coefficients of −0.291, −0.413, and −0.256 on a logarithmic scale, respectively (Table 4). HTWM showed no clear relationship with latitude (Table 4). For soil properties, SOM was significantly negatively correlated with latitude (p < 0.01), with a correlation coefficient of −0.216 on a logarithmic scale (Table 5). AP and PH were significantly positively correlated with latitude (p < 0.01), with correlation coefficients of 0.223 and 0.216 on a logarithmic scale, respectively (Table 5). AN, AK, and BD showed no clear relationship with latitude (Table 5).

3.4. Relationship between Temperatures and P. massoniana NPP

P. massoniana NPP correlated highly with temperatures. As the MAT increased, NPP of both P. massoniana components (i.e., NPPstem, NPPbra, NPPleaf, NPProot, NPPag, and NPPtree) increased signifcantly (p < 0.05, Figure 5a,d,g,j,m,p). In addition, LTCM was also significantly positively correlated with NPPstem, NPPbra, NPPleaf, NPPag, and NPPtree (p < 0.05, Figure 5b,e,h,n,q).

4. Discussion

4.1. Factors Influencing NPP of P. massoniana Forests

4.1.1. Climate Effects

P. massoniana NPPstem and NPPag were significantly positively correlated with MAT (Table 3). This finding is consistent with previous studies [37,38,39], indicating that the warming effect can promote biomass accumulation of P. massoniana. Zhang et al. (2011) [30] showed that low air temperature from January to March was the major factor controlling the interannual variations of net carbon uptake, and cold springs greatly shortened the growing season length, reducing the carbon uptake period. Similarly, Zheng et al. (2012) [31] found that even a short-term freezing event during the transitional periods from dormancy to growth in early spring could result in disastrous damage to pine forests in temperate China. However, HTWM was significantly negatively correlated with NPPstem and NPPtree (Table 3), because higher temperatures in summer can increase plant evapotranspiration and respiration rates, leading to decreased biomass accumulation rates in subtropical forests [40]. Therefore, temperatures had an important effect on P. massoniana NPP. Large differences of NPP in sensitivity to temperature and precipitation were identified among various biomes and regions [41,42]. Regression analysis showed that NPP of both P. massoniana components increased significantly as MAT increased (Figure 5a,d,g,j,m,p). LMM results showed that MAT was positively correlated with NPPstem and NPPag (Table 3), which formed relatively high proportions of NPPtree (Table 1). Although NPPbra and NPPleaf were also positively correlated with MAP (Table 3), NPP of these two components only formed relatively low proportions of NPPtree (Table 1). In fact, tree growth in our study region is probably not often limited by precipitation. Moreover, the magnitude of variation in MAP was not large enough to lead to significant changes in forest productivity in this region, since P. massoniana is distributed in a large gradient zone of precipitation in south-east Yangtze River basin and the southeast rivers [43]. Liang et al. (2015) [44] found that air temperature was the dominant climatic factor that controlled the interannual variability in NPP throughout the country except for arid and semi-arid regions in the middle–north and northwest parts of China. Similarly, Wang et al. (2011) [45] found that forest NPP appeared to be primarily a function of temperature, not precipitation, in subtropical Louisiana, USA. Furthermore, Churkina and Running (1998) [46] reported that temperature appeared to be the primary control on evergreen needle-leaved forest NPP on a global scale. Overall, our findings were in line with previous studies, indicating that P. massoniana NPP was more sensitive to temperature than to precipitation.

4.1.2. Soil Effects

P. massoniana NPPstem significantly increased with SOM and AP (Table 3), indicating that, although this species can be used as a pioneer species for afforestation in infertile soil, soil with sufficient nutrients can promote biomass accumulation of P. massoniana. AP was significantly positively correlated with NPPstem, while AN and AK were not significantly correlated with P. massoniana NPP (Table 3). NPP of P. massoniana forests was more sensitive to soil AP than to soil AN and AK. This result may be attributed to the fact that southern China is dominated by acidic red soil, where phosphorus is mostly fixed in insoluble form, and the AP content directly absorbed by plants is extremely low [47]. Therefore, the response of P. massoniana to phosphorus deficiency has received extensive attention in the context of N deposition in recent years [48]. In our study, soil BD was significantly positively correlated with NPPstem, NPProot, and NPPtree (Table 3). However, there were relatively few studies on the relationship between soil physical properties and tree growth of P. massoniana. Therefore, this result needs to be further confirmed.

4.1.3. Stand Characteristics Effects

During this study, P. massoniana NPPstem significantly increased, whereas NPPleaf significantly decreased with age (Table 3). This finding can be explained by the variation in biomass allocation patterns with tree growth. Stems, as support tissues, obtain more biomass investment with tree growth, at the expense of branch and leaf biomass [49]. Wood (dead cells) continuously accumulates in the stem as trees grow, whereas branch and leaf biomass decrease as the early death of lower branches is caused by mutual shading [49]. Additionally, following canopy closure, older and taller trees entail greater expenditures for their construction and maintenance and expend more energy than younger and shorter trees to supply leaves with the same amount of water [49]. P. massoniana NPPstem, NPProot, NPPag, and NPPtree significantly increased with age (Table 3), probably because the forest stands in our database were mostly middle-aged plantations (Table S1), in which age-related decline in forest productivity has not yet occurred [50,51]. Stand density was significantly positively correlated with NPPstem, NPPbra, NPProot, NPPag, and NPPtree (Table 3), indicating that density had a marked impact on productivity estimation. This finding was similar to that of Bormann and Gordon (1984) [52], who found that aboveground mass and total mass per unit area were the greatest in the dense stands. In contrast to the trends in per-unit-area values, for average tree values, dry mass of all individual-tree components and totals were the highest in the open stands, and the lowest in the dense stands [52]. At lower stand densities, less growth per unit area is obtained, but this will be offset by greater growth per tree [53]. In a 42-year thinning experiment, Horner et al. (2010) [54] found that moderately thinned stands had the highest aboveground carbon storage rate and the highest aboveground carbon stocks rather than unthinned treatment (highest density). Therefore, although there was a significant positive correlation between NPP and density in this study, this relationship varied between stands due to the trade-off between maximizing individual tree size or stand yield [53]. Therefore, for long-term managed plantations, the initial density, thinning practice and the competition–density effect should be considered in productivity predictions [55,56].

4.2. Latitudinal Effects on NPP of P. massoniana Forests

In this study, P. massoniana NPPstem, NPPbra, NPPleaf, NPProot, NPPag, and NPPtree exhibited inverse latitudinal trends, but no longitudinal and elevation trends (Table 2). Liu et al. (2016) [26] found that forest NPP show no clear relationship with longitude but negatively correlate with latitude in southwestern China. Ni (2003) [11] also concluded that forest NPP significantly decreased with increasing latitude based on forest inventory data in China between 1989 and 1993. In the study of Zhan et al. (2018) [27] on forests in eastern China, the functional relationship between NPP and latitude was: y = 0.06x2 − 3.91x + 73.71 (R2 = 0.38, p < 0.001), NPP decreased first and then increased with the increase in latitude, and monotonically decreased with increasing latitude when the latitude was below 35.0 °N. Thus, the results of our study are consistent with previous studies.
Latitude is not an environmental factor capable of having direct influence on P. massoniana growth [57,58], but rather an indirect variable that condenses a set of factors that vary from south to north, including MAT, LTCM, MAP, AP, PH, and SOM in this study (Table 4 and Table 5). Climatically, the north-to-south and west-to-east gradients in China both reflect shifts from cold and dry to warm and moist conditions, although the thermal gradient is steeper in the former and the moisture gradient more pronounced in the latter [25,59]. The correlation analysis of latitude and climate indicators showed that MAT, LTCM, and MAP decrease with increasing latitude (Table 4), which is in line with the generally accepted idea that the southern part of China is warmer and moister than the northern part. It is worth noting that HTWM, which was significantly negatively correlated with P. massoniana NPPstem and NPPtree (Table 3), did not show a significant latitudinal trend (Table 4). This suggested that high temperatures were a significant climate stressor across the species geographical distribution and were not restricted to marginal populations at low latitudes. MAT and MAP, which were significantly positively correlated with NPP (Table 3), showed inverse latitudinal trends (Table 4). Therefore, both temperature and precipitation contributed to the formation of the inverse latitudinal trends of P. massoniana NPP. Temperature was a key contributing factor to these trends, as NPP was highly sensitive to any change in temperature. AP and SOM, which were significantly positively correlated with P. massoniana productivity (Table 3), showed different latitudinal trends (Table 5). Latitude was significantly positively correlated with AP, but significantly negatively correlated with SOM (Table 5). In fact, low phosphorus availability is a limiting factor on P. massoniana growth not only at low latitudes, but also in the broad red soil areas in southern China [60]. In summary, the latitudinal trends of P. massoniana productivity are driven by the significant influences of climate and soil properties.

4.3. Uncertainty Analysis

In this study, some uncertainties in forest productivity assessment have been eliminated in the process of developing the biomass database. However, there was still a great deal of variability in influencing factors. Atmospheric N deposition, elevated CO2 concentration, and climate warming have been confirmed to affect P. massoniana growth [61,62]. Moreover, they can affect other biological processes and thus indirectly affect forest productivity. For example, N deposition will further aggravate soil acidification and change soil nutrient conditions (e.g., N:P ratio) [63,64]. Furthermore, in the process of biomass data acquisition, it was found that the size classes for P. massoniana roots were not uniform across studies, which made it difficult to establish a complete database containing root sizes, although roots with diameter < 2 mm were usually defined as fine roots. Pan et al. (2018) [65] suggested that understory vegetation generated different effects on soil carbon and nitrogen processes in aerially seeded P. massoniana plantations. Therefore, the missing components in field measurements, including shrubs, herbs, and litterfall, not only lead to an underestimation of actual NPP, but their significant contribution to biological processes of tree growth should also be considered in future studies.

5. Conclusions

We established a new regional database of P. massoniana forest biomass. Tree components (stem, branch, leaf, root, aboveground organs and total tree) exhibited large NPP variation across sampling sites. Climate, soil, and stand characteristics have a marked impact on the NPP of P. massoniana forests, and the influence of these variables on the NPP of different tree components varied. Appropriate temperature and soil nutrients, especially soil AP, are beneficial to P. massoniana growth. NPP of all tree components of P. massoniana exhibited inverse latitudinal trends, which were driven by the significant influences of climate and soil properties. Temperature was a key environmental factor for the formation of these trends. Future studies should place a particular emphasis on the effects of various components of the forest ecosystem, particularly soil, litterfall, and understory vegetation on the biological processes of tree growth, and their interactions with climate change.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/4/404/s1, Table S1: Primary data of site condition, plot size, stand age, density, component biomass (stem, B1; branch, B2; leaf, B3; root, B4; aboveground organs, B5; and total tree, B6) and measurement year for Pinus massoniana forests in southern China. Table S2: Parameters fitted to the final model, full model, and null model by means of linear mixed-effects models.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.H. and M.T.; methodology, Z.Z. and P.W.; formal analysis, P.W.; writing—original draft preparation, X.H.; writing—review and editing, Z.Z.; visualization, X.H. and C.H.; funding acquisition, M.T. All authors have read and agree to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFD0600201), the Major Scientific and Technical Innovation Project of Hubei Province, China (2018ABA074) and research platform support was provided by the Long-Term Track Research Program of the Forest Ecological Station in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region (Zigui) of the Yangtze River, China.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFD0600201), the Major Scientific and Technical Innovation Project of Hubei Province, China (2018ABA074) and research platform support from the Long-Term Track Research Program of the Forest Ecological Station in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region (Zigui) of the Yangtze River, China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brockerhoff, E.G.; Barbaro, L.; Castagneyrol, B.; Forrester, D.I.; Gardiner, B.; González-Olabarria, J.R.; Lyver, P.O.B.; Meurisse, N.; Oxbrough, A.; Taki, H.; et al. Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Biodivers. Conserv. 2017, 26, 3005–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Hamilton, S.E.; Friess, D.A. Global carbon stocks and potential emissions due to mangrove deforestation from 2000 to 2012. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2018, 8, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Keeling, H.C.; Phillips, O.L. The global relationship between forest productivity and biomass. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007, 16, 618–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Malhi, Y.; Doughty, C.; Galbraith, D. The allocation of ecosystem net primary productivity in tropical forests. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 366, 3225–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Cloern, J.E.; Abreu, P.C.; Carstensen, J.; Chauvaud, L.; Elmgren, R.; Grall, J.; Greening, H.; Johansson, J.O.R.; Kahru, M.; Sherwood, E.T.; et al. Human activities and climate variability drive fast-paced change across the world’s estuarine-coastal ecosystems. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2016, 22, 513–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Drake, J.E.; Gallet-Budynek, A.; Hofmockel, K.S.; Bernhardt, E.S.; Billings, S.A.; Jackson, R.B.; Johnsen, K.S.; Lichter, J.; Mccarthy, H.R.; Mccormack, M.L.; et al. Increases in the flux of carbon belowground stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long-term enhancement of forest productivity under elevated CO2. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Malhi, Y.; Girardin, C.A.J.; Goldsmith, G.R.; Doughty, C.E.; Salinas, N.; Metcalfe, D.B.; Huaraca Huasco, W.; Silva-Espejo, J.E.; del Aguilla-Pasquell, J.; Farfán Amézquita, F.; et al. The variation of productivity and its allocation along a tropical elevation gradient: A whole carbon budget perspective. New Phytol. 2017, 214, 1019–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Girardin, C.A.J.; Malhi, Y.; Aragão, L.E.O.C.; Mamani, M.; Huaraca Huasco, W.; Durand, L.; Feeley, K.J.; Rapp, J.; Silva-Espejo, J.E.; Silman, M.; et al. Net primary productivity allocation and cycling of carbon along a tropical forest elevational transect in the Peruvian Andes. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2010, 16, 3176–3192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Malhi, Y. The productivity, metabolism and carbon cycle of tropical forest vegetation. J. Ecol. 2012, 100, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ni, J.; Zhang, X.S.; Scurlock, J.M.O. Synthesis and analysis of biomass and net primary productivity in Chinese forests. Ann. For. Sci. 2001, 58, 351–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ni, J. Net primary productivity in forests of China: Scaling-up of national inventory data and comparison with model predictions. For. Ecol. Manag. 2003, 176, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, J.; Ji, X.; Deane, D.C.; Wu, L.; Chen, S. Spatiotemporal distribution and driving factors of forest biomass carbon storage in China: 1977–2013. Forests 2017, 8, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Xu, X.; Li, K. Biomass carbon sequestration by planted forests in China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2010, 20, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Silva, L.N.; Freer-Smith, P.; Madsen, P. Production, restoration, mitigation: A new generation of plantations. New For. 2019, 50, 153–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, M.; Zhou, G.S. Estimation of biomass and net primary productivity of major planted forests in China based on forest inventory data. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 207, 295–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Payn, T.; Carnus, J.M.; Freer-Smith, P.; Kimberley, M.; Kollert, W.; Liu, S.; Orazio, C.; Rodriguez, L.; Silva, L.N.; Wingfield, M.J. Changes in planted forests and future global implications. For. Ecol. Manag. 2015, 352, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Xi, W.; Wang, F.; Shi, P.; Dai, E.; Anoruo, A.O.; Bi, H.; Rahmlow, A.; He, B.; Li, W. Challenges to sustainable development in China: A review of six large-scale forest restoration and land conservation programs. J. Sustain. For. 2014, 33, 435–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, Z.X. Masson Pine in China; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2001. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Feng, Z.W.; Chen, C.Y.; Zhang, J.W.; Wang, K.P.; Zhao, J.L.; Gao, H. Determination of biomass of Pinus massoniana stand in Huitong county, Hunan province. Sci. Silvae Sin. 1982, 18, 127–134. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Ali, A.; Ahmad, A.; Akhtar, K.; Teng, M.; Zeng, W.; Yan, Z.; Zhou, Z. Patterns of biomass, carbon, and soil properties in masson pine (Pinus massoniana Lamb) plantations with different stand ages and management practices. Forests 2019, 10, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Xiang, W.; Liu, S.; Deng, X.; Shen, A.; Lei, X.; Tian, D.; Zhao, M.; Peng, C. General allometric equations and biomass allocation of Pinus massoniana trees on a regional scale in southern China. Ecol. Res. 2011, 26, 697–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. You, Y.; Huang, X.; Zhu, H.; Liu, S.; Liang, H.; Wen, Y.; Wang, H.; Cai, D.; Ye, D. Positive interactions between Pinus massoniana and Castanopsis hystrix species in the uneven-aged mixed plantations can produce more ecosystem carbon in subtropical China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 410, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Komiyama, A.; Ong, J.E.; Poungparn, S. Allometry, biomass, and productivity of mangrove forests: A review. Aquat. Bot. 2008, 89, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liang, H.; Huang, J.G.; Ma, Q.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Guo, X.; Zhu, H.; Jiang, S.; Zhou, P.; Yu, B.; et al. Contributions of competition and climate on radial growth of Pinus massoniana in subtropics of China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2019, 274, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, H.; Song, T.; Wang, K.; Wang, G.; Liao, J.; Xu, G.; Zeng, F. Biogeographical patterns of forest biomass allocation vary by climate, soil and forest characteristics in China. Environ. Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 44014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Liu, L.B.; Yang, H.M.; Xu, Y.; Guo, Y.M.; Ni, J. Forest biomass and net primary productivity in Southwestern China: A meta-analysis focusing on environmental driving factors. Forests 2016, 7, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhan, X.; Guo, M.; Zhang, T. Joint control of net primary productivity by climate and soil nitrogen in the forests of Eastern China. Forests 2018, 9, 173. [Google Scholar]
  28. Forrester, D.I. The spatial and temporal dynamics of species interactions in mixed-species forests: From pattern to process. For. Ecol. Manag. 2014, 312, 282–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, G.; Hobbie, S.E.; Reich, P.B.; Yang, Y.; Robinson, D. Allometry of fine roots in forest ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2019, 22, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zhang, W.J.; Wang, H.M.; Yang, F.T.; Yi, Y.H.; Wen, X.F.; Sun, X.M.; Yu, G.R.; Wang, Y.D.; Ning, J.C. Underestimated effects of low temperature during early growing season on carbon sequestration of a subtropical coniferous plantation. Biogeosciences 2011, 8, 1667–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zheng, Y.; Yang, Q.; Xu, M.; Chi, Y.; Shen, R.; Li, P.; Dai, H. Responses of Pinus massoniana and Pinus taeda to freezing in temperate forests in central China. Scand. J. For. Res. 2012, 27, 520–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Grueber, C.E.; Nakagawa, S.; Laws, R.J.; Jamieson, I.G. Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: Challenges and solutions. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 24, 699–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kuznetsova, A.; Brockhoff, P.B.; Christensen, R.H.B. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. J. Stat. Softw. 2017, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  35. Bartoń, K. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference, R package version 1.43.15. 2019. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn (accessed on 20 December 2019).
  36. Nakagawa, S.; Schielzeth, H. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2013, 4, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, F.; Yuan, Y.J.; Yu, S.L.; Zhang, T.W. Influence of climate warming and resin collection on the growth of Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) in a subtropical forest, southern China. Trees-Struct. Funct. 2015, 29, 1423–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhou, G.; Huang, W.; Duan, H. Warming effects on photosynthesis of subtropical tree species: A translocation experiment along an altitudinal gradient. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Li, Y.; Zhou, G.; Liu, J. Different growth and physiological responses of six subtropical tree species to warming. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Zhou, H.; Luo, Y.; Zhou, G.; Yu, J.; Shah, S.; Meng, S.; Liu, Q. Exploring the sensitivity of subtropical stand aboveground productivity to local and regional climate signals in South China. Forests 2019, 10, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Lindroth, A.; Grelle, A.; More, A. Long-term measurements of boreal forest carbon balance. Glob. Chang. Biol. 1998, 4, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schuur, E.A.G. Productivity and global climate revisited: The sensitivity of tropical forest growth to precipitation. Ecology 2003, 84, 1165–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, Q.; Xu, C.Y.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y.D.; Liu, C.L. Spatial and temporal variability of precipitation over China, 1951–2005. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2009, 95, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liang, W.; Yang, Y.; Fan, D.; Guan, H.; Zhang, T.; Long, D.; Zhou, Y.; Bai, D. Analysis of spatial and temporal patterns of net primary production and their climate controls in China from 1982 to 2010. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2015, 204, 22–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, F.; Xu, Y.J.; Dean, T.J. Projecting climate change effects on forest net primary productivity in subtropical Louisiana, USA. Ambio 2011, 40, 506–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Churkina, G.; Running, S.W. Contrasting climatic controls on the estimated productivity of global terrestrial biomes. Ecosystems 1998, 1, 206–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Huang, W.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.P.; Zhou, G.; Han, T.; Li, Y. Increasing phosphorus limitation along three successional forests in southern China. Plant Soil 2013, 364, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hu, C.; Zhao, L.; Zhou, Z.; Dong, G.; Zhang, Y. Genetic variations and correlation analysis of N and P traits in Pinus massoniana under combined conditions of N deposition and P deficiency. Trees-Struct. Funct. 2016, 30, 1341–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fang, Y.; Zou, X.; Lie, Z.; Xue, L. Variation in organ biomass with changing climate and forest characteristics across Chinese forests. Forests 2018, 9, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ryan, M.G.; Binkley, D.; Fownes, J.H. Age-related decline in forest productivity: Pattern and process. Adv. Ecol. Res. 1997, 27, 213–262. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pregitzer, K.S.; Euskirchen, E.S. Carbon cycling and storage in world forests: Biome patterns related to forest age. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2004, 10, 2052–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bormann, B.T.; Gordon, J.C. Stand density effects in young red alder plantations: Productivity, photosynthate partitioning, and nitrogen fixation. Ecology 1984, 65, 394–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Drew, T.J.; Flewelling, J.W. Stand density management: An alternative approach and its application to Douglas-fir plantations. For. Sci. 1979, 25, 518–532. [Google Scholar]
  54. Horner, G.J.; Baker, P.J.; Mac Nally, R.; Cunningham, S.C.; Thomson, J.R.; Hamilton, F. Forest structure, habitat and carbon benefits from thinning floodplain forests: Managing early stand density makes a difference. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xue, L.; Hagihara, A. Growth analysis on the C-D effect in self-thinning Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) stands. For. Ecol. Manag. 2002, 165, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Magruder, M.; Chhin, S.; Monks, A.; O’Brien, J. Effects of initial stand density and climate on red pine productivity within Huron National Forest, Michigan, USA. Forests 2012, 3, 1086–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. López-Medellín, X.; Ezcurra, E. The productivity of mangroves in northwestern Mexico: A meta-analysis of current data. J. Coast. Conserv. 2012, 16, 399–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, H.; Wang, K.; Xu, X.; Song, T.; Xu, Y.; Zeng, F. Biogeographical patterns of biomass allocation in leaves, stems, and roots in Chinas forests. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  59. Han, W.X.; Fang, J.Y.; Reich, P.B.; Ian Woodward, F.; Wang, Z.H. Biogeography and variability of eleven mineral elements in plant leaves across gradients of climate, soil and plant functional type in China. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14, 788–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Xu, R.; Zhao, A.; Li, Q.; Kong, X.; Ji, G. Acidity regime of the red soils in a subtropical region of southern China under field conditions. Geoderma 2003, 115, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sun, F.; Kuang, Y.; Wen, D.; Xu, Z.; Li, J.; Zuo, W.; Hou, E. Long-term tree growth rate, water use efficiency, and tree ring nitrogen isotope composition of Pinus massoniana L. in response to global climate change and local nitrogen deposition in Southern China. J. Soils Sediments 2010, 10, 1453–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wu, T.; Lin, W.; Li, Y.; Lie, Z.; Huang, W.; Liu, J. Nitrogen addition method affects growth and nitrogen accumulation in seedlings of four subtropical tree species: Schima superba Gardner & Champ., Pinus massoniana Lamb., Acacia mangium Willd., and Ormosia pinnata Lour. Ann. For. Sci. 2019, 76, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, Q. Nitrogen (N) Deposition impacts seedling growth of Pinus massoniana via N:P ratio effects and the modulation of adaptive responses to low P (phosphorus). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Huang, W.; Zhou, G.; Liu, J.; Duan, H.; Liu, X.; Fang, X.; Zhang, D. Shifts in soil phosphorus fractions under elevated CO2 and N addition in model forest ecosystems in subtropical China. Plant Ecol. 2014, 215, 1373–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pan, P.; Zhao, F.; Ning, J.; Zhang, L.; Ouyang, X.; Zang, H. Impact of understory vegetation on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamic in aerially seeded Pinus massoniana plantations. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Forests 11 00404 g001 550
Figure 1. Geographical distribution of field study sites included in our database. Some plots are not visible as they are very close to each other and overlap. Geographical distribution range (shaded area) of P. massoniana adapted from Zhou (2001) [18].
Figure 1. Geographical distribution of field study sites included in our database. Some plots are not visible as they are very close to each other and overlap. Geographical distribution range (shaded area) of P. massoniana adapted from Zhou (2001) [18].
Forests 11 00404 g001
Forests 11 00404 g002 550
Figure 2. Frequency distributions of (a) annual maximum temperature and (b) annual minimum temperature occurrence time of 819 meteorological stations from 1981 to 2010 in southern China, where P. massoniana dominate. Data were obtained from meteorological stations in 11 provinces (Guizhou, Chongqing, Guangxi, Hunan, Fujian, Guangdong, Jiangxi, Hubei, Sichuan, Zhejiang and Anhui) provided by China National Meteorological Information Center (http://data.cma.cn/). The percentage of observations are presented in parentheses.
Figure 2. Frequency distributions of (a) annual maximum temperature and (b) annual minimum temperature occurrence time of 819 meteorological stations from 1981 to 2010 in southern China, where P. massoniana dominate. Data were obtained from meteorological stations in 11 provinces (Guizhou, Chongqing, Guangxi, Hunan, Fujian, Guangdong, Jiangxi, Hubei, Sichuan, Zhejiang and Anhui) provided by China National Meteorological Information Center (http://data.cma.cn/). The percentage of observations are presented in parentheses.
Forests 11 00404 g002
Forests 11 00404 g003 550
Figure 3. Frequency distributions of (a) stem, (b) branch, (c) leaf, (d) root, (e) aboveground organs and (f) total tree net primary productivity (NPP) of P. massoniana forests in south China. The mean and standard deviation values are presented. The curves were fitted by a Gaussian function.
Figure 3. Frequency distributions of (a) stem, (b) branch, (c) leaf, (d) root, (e) aboveground organs and (f) total tree net primary productivity (NPP) of P. massoniana forests in south China. The mean and standard deviation values are presented. The curves were fitted by a Gaussian function.
Forests 11 00404 g003
Forests 11 00404 g004 550
Figure 4. Net primary productivity (NPP) spatial distribution of P. massoniana forests in relation to longitude, latitude (a), and elevation (b).
Figure 4. Net primary productivity (NPP) spatial distribution of P. massoniana forests in relation to longitude, latitude (a), and elevation (b).
Forests 11 00404 g004
Forests 11 00404 g005 550
Figure 5. The relationships between P. massoniana net primary productivity (NPP) and MAT (a,d,g,j,m,p), LTCM (b,e,h,k,n,q), and HTWM (c,f,i,l,o,r) on a logarithmic (ln) scale. Mean annual temperature (MAT); mean low temperatures in cold months (LTCM); mean high temperatures in warm months (HTWM).
Figure 5. The relationships between P. massoniana net primary productivity (NPP) and MAT (a,d,g,j,m,p), LTCM (b,e,h,k,n,q), and HTWM (c,f,i,l,o,r) on a logarithmic (ln) scale. Mean annual temperature (MAT); mean low temperatures in cold months (LTCM); mean high temperatures in warm months (HTWM).
Forests 11 00404 g005
Table
Table 1. Net primary productivity (NPP) of P. massoniana stem, branch, leaf, root, aboveground organs, and total tree. Number of observations (N), mean value (Mean), maximum value (Max), minimum value (Min) and standard error (SE) were reported.
Table 1. Net primary productivity (NPP) of P. massoniana stem, branch, leaf, root, aboveground organs, and total tree. Number of observations (N), mean value (Mean), maximum value (Max), minimum value (Min) and standard error (SE) were reported.
ComponentNNPP (Mg·ha−1·year−1)
MeanMaxMinSE
Stem1723.518.710.290.13
Branch1680.692.110.100.03
Leaf1680.342.310.020.02
Root1480.812.110.070.03
Aboveground1854.5310.810.880.15
Total tree1615.6513.131.040.20
Table
Table 2. Pearson correlations between site conditions and P. massoniana stem, branch, leaf, root, aboveground, and total tree net primary productivity (NPP) on a logarithmic (ln) scale.
Table 2. Pearson correlations between site conditions and P. massoniana stem, branch, leaf, root, aboveground, and total tree net primary productivity (NPP) on a logarithmic (ln) scale.
Site ConditionsNPPstemNPPbraNPPleafNPProotNPPagNPPtree
Longitude (°E)−0.112−0.054−0.007−0.110−0.100−0.119
Latitude (°N)−0.285 **−0.369 **−0.208 **−0.251 **−0.338 **−0.344 **
Elevation (m)−0.087−0.0190.102−0.069−0.061−0.094
Note: (1) stem net primary productivity (NPPstem); branch net primary productivity (NPPbra); leaf net primary productivity (NPPleaf); root net primary productivity (NPProot); aboveground net primary productivity (NPPag); net primary productivity of total tree (NPPtree); (2) ** represent p < 0.01.
Table
Table 3. Summary of the final model to test the effects of environmental factors and stand characteristics on P. massoniana stem, branch, leaf, root, aboveground, and total tree net primary productivity (NPP). Only the best-performing model, with the lowest the Akaike Information Criterion corrected for small samples (AICc), is shown (see Table S2 for the results of model performance).
Table 3. Summary of the final model to test the effects of environmental factors and stand characteristics on P. massoniana stem, branch, leaf, root, aboveground, and total tree net primary productivity (NPP). Only the best-performing model, with the lowest the Akaike Information Criterion corrected for small samples (AICc), is shown (see Table S2 for the results of model performance).
NPP ComponentParameterVariable
InterceptMATHTWMAGEDENSITYBDMAPANAPSOM
StemEstimate8.7971.575−5.0990.5620.2161.170——0.4240.370
SE5.7460.4661.7450.0860.0670.585——0.1280.171
t-value1.5313.378−2.9226.5203.2331.999——3.3112.160
p-value0.131<0.01<0.01<0.001<0.01<0.05——<0.01<0.05
BranchEstimate2.524—−3.997—0.1480.9131.294———
SE7.119—2.472—0.0590.6540.455———
t-value0.355—−1.617—2.5331.3972.844———
p-value0.724—0.111—<0.050.168<0.01———
LeafEstimate6.673—−4.488−0.5880.1440.6611.098———
SE7.924—2.7770.0970.0730.7250.515———
t-value0.842—−1.616−6.0451.9640.9122.133———
p-value0.403—0.111<0.0010.0520.366<0.05———
RootEstimate−1.4791.173−2.8150.4290.2571.885—0.833——
SE5.4360.6561.5890.0910.0700.898—0.439——
t-value−0.2721.787−1.7724.6993.6802.098—1.894——
p-value0.7860.0790.081<0.001<0.001<0.05—0.063——
AbovegroundEstimate1.4941.142−1.6660.3330.182—————
SE3.5100.4120.9980.0770.064—————
t-value0.4262.771−1.6694.3332.852—————
p-value0.671<0.010.099<0.001<0.01—————
Total treeEstimate1.9200.989−4.1580.4090.2581.3560.6810.598——
SE4.6350.5201.9100.0800.0660.6470.5290.341——
t-value0.4141.900−2.1775.0923.9112.0961.2871.757——
p-value0.6800.062<0.05<0.001<0.001<0.050.2020.083——
Note: mean annual temperature (MAT); mean high temperatures in warm months (HTWM); stand age (AGE); stand density (DENSITY); bulk density (BD); mean annual precipitation (MAP); alkali-hydrolysable nitrogen (AN); available phosphorus (AP); soil organic matter (SOM).
Table
Table 4. Pearson correlations between site conditions and climate factors on a logarithmic (ln) scale.
Table 4. Pearson correlations between site conditions and climate factors on a logarithmic (ln) scale.
VariablesMATLTCMHTWMMAP
Longitude (°E)−0.073−0.173 *0.352 **0.242 **
Latitude (°N)−0.291 **−0.413 **−0.061−0.256 **
Elevation (m)−0.334 **0.319 **−0.391 **−0.048
Note: (1) mean annual temperature (MAT); mean low temperatures in cold months (LTCM); mean high temperatures in warm months (HTWM); mean annual precipitation (MAP). (2) * and ** represent p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
Table
Table 5. Pearson correlations between site conditions and soil factors on a logarithmic (ln) scale.
Table 5. Pearson correlations between site conditions and soil factors on a logarithmic (ln) scale.
VariablesAPANAKPHSOMBD
Longitude (°E)−0.068−0.175 *−0.291 **0.051−0.341 **0.152 *
Latitude (°N)0.223 **−0.093−0.0740.216 **−0.216 **−0.112
Elevation (m)0.0160.417 **0.292 **0.153 *0.280 **−0.213 **
Note: (1) bulk density (BD); alkali-hydrolysable nitrogen (AN); available phosphorus (AP); soil organic matter (SOM); available potassium (AK). (2) * and ** represent p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, X.; Huang, C.; Teng, M.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, P. Net Primary Productivity of Pinus massoniana Dependence on Climate, Soil and Forest Characteristics. Forests 2020, 11, 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040404

AMA Style

Huang X, Huang C, Teng M, Zhou Z, Wang P. Net Primary Productivity of Pinus massoniana Dependence on Climate, Soil and Forest Characteristics. Forests. 2020; 11(4):404. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040404

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Xin, Chunbo Huang, Mingjun Teng, Zhixiang Zhou, and Pengcheng Wang. 2020. "Net Primary Productivity of Pinus massoniana Dependence on Climate, Soil and Forest Characteristics" Forests 11, no. 4: 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040404

APA Style

Huang, X., Huang, C., Teng, M., Zhou, Z., & Wang, P. (2020). Net Primary Productivity of Pinus massoniana Dependence on Climate, Soil and Forest Characteristics. Forests, 11(4), 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040404

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop