Next Article in Journal
Simulating the Effects of Intensifying Silviculture on Desired Species Yields across a Broad Environmental Gradient
Previous Article in Journal
Soil Bacterial Community Composition in Cryptomeria japonica Plantation at Different Times after Clear-Cutting
Previous Article in Special Issue
Germination of Dracaena cinnabari Balf.f. Seeds under Controlled Temperature Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Dragon Trees, Tertiary Relicts in Current Reality

1
Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocoenology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
2
Department of Environmental Biology, Sapienza-University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
3
Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2021, 12(6), 756; https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060756
Submission received: 2 June 2021 / Accepted: 3 June 2021 / Published: 8 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dragon Trees - Tertiary Relicts in Current Reality)
Few of the about 190 species currently described in the plant genus Dracaena [1] (Asparagaceae) reach the arborescent form. Arborescent dracaenas have been classified into the Dragon tree group [2]: Dracaena cinnabari Balf.f., D. tamaranae A. Marrero, R. S. Almeida et M. González-Martín, D. draco L. s.l., D. ombet Kotschy & Peyr. s.l. and D. serrulata Baker s.l., and D. ellenbeckiana Engl. from South Arabia, Macaronesia and North Africa. In addition, several species from Southeast Asia, such as D. jayniana Wilkin & Suksathan, D. cochinchinensis (Lour.) S. C. Chen, D. yuccifolia Ridl., D. cambodiana Pierre ex Gagnep. and D. kaweesakii Wilkin & Suksathan, can be included due to their tree growth habit [3,4,5].
Dragon trees are considered Tertiary relict species [6]. These trees have been part of one of the oldest woodland ecosystems in the world [7]. Most species are endemic with limited (often island) distributions [2,5,8,9]. The distribution of Dragon trees is highly fragmented, consisting of small populations with unbalanced age structures. Often young trees are missing because natural regeneration is reduced by the overgrazing of livestock [3,5,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Dragon trees can be found in areas characterized by a predominantly arid tropical climate with a monsoon seasonality bringing wet air in the form of clouds and fog [19,20]. They are well adapted morphologically and physiologically to capture water in such conditions [21,22,23]. Several Dragon tree species are endangered (some are even extinct) according to the IUCN Red List, even though most of the species have not been assessed yet.
Dragon trees are an important source of non-timber plant products for indigenous communities [24]. They produce a red resin, called dragon’s blood, which has been used for coloring and medical purposes since ancient times [25]. The dragon’s blood was an important trade product in Ancient Egypt and in the Greek and Roman empires [26,27]. Therefore, Dragon trees are among the plants that have played a key role in human history. They have, therefore, important natural and cultural values.
Because of their global importance, we assembled a group of researchers and local practitioners engaged in the research and conservation of the vulnerable and often endangered arborescent Dracaena species of the world. To this goal, we organized the first World Conference on Dragon Trees, hosted by Mendel University in Brno (Czech Republic), on 5–8 September 2019. The conference hosted about 35 attendants from 12 different countries. The main objective of the event was to present the latest results of scientific research focused on species of the Dragon tree group and to determine the main gaps for future investigation as the basis for their conservation and management. An important output of the conference was the establishment of the first Dragon Tree Consortium, an informal open society that focuses on cooperation in Dragon tree research and conservation.
The Special Issue includes nine studies covering a broad range of research topics related to Dragon trees. Celiński et al. [28] present the complete D. draco chloroplast genome, which provides new information and helps to elucidate phylogenetic relationships, particularly within the genus Dracaena. A new approach in taxonomy with a potential for growth analysis is presented by Vahalík et al. [29], who compared 3D tree models of four Dragon tree species. Germination trials published by Bauerová et al. [30] show the high regeneration potential of D. cinnabari seeds, an endemic species on Socotra Island (Yemen). Two studies focus on the Dragon tree resin, one on the traditional way of harvesting resin from D. cinnabari described by Al Okaishi [31], while Ding et al. [32] reviewed the progress and achievements from applied history as well as induction techniques that are used for the formation of dragon’s blood of D. cambodiana, which has taken place in China. Lengálová et al. [33] developed the first model of crown age estimation for D. ombet and D. draco subsp. caboverdeana, species that have an important value for population studies and setting up a framework for conservation measurements. Vahalík et al. [34] present the results of an extensive inventory of D. serrulata in Oman and an assessment of its threats. Vasconcelos et al. [35] highlight D. cinnabari as an umbrella species providing microhabitats for almost half of the endemic reptile fauna on Socotra. Finally, Maděra et al. [36] review the current knowledge of the taxonomy, evolution, anatomy and morphology, physiology and ontogeny of the arborescent Dragon tree species. Attention was paid to the composition, harvesting, medicinal and ethnobotanical use of the resin (dragon’s blood). An evaluation of population structure, distribution, ecology, threats and conservation issues forms the final part of the review.
We hope that the world’s first Dragon tree conference and this topical collection will establish a new tradition to stimulate the scientific investigation and improved conservation of this unique and globally endangered tree group.

Author Contributions

All co-authors were involved in writing—original draft preparation (P.M., F.A., H.H. and K.V.D.). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Govaerts, R.; Zonneveld, B.J.M.; Zona, S.A. World Checklist of Asparagaceae. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available online: http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/ (accessed on 12 May 2021).
  2. Marrero, A.; Almeida, S.R.; Martín-González, M. A new species of the wild Dragon Tree, Dracaena (Dracaenaceae) from Gran Canaria and its taxonomic and biogeographic Implications. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1998, 128, 291–314. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wilkin, P.; Suksathan, P.; Keeratikiat, K.; Van Welzen, P.; Wiland-Szymanska, J. A new threatened endemic species from central and northeastern Thailand, Dracaena jayniana (Asparagaceae: Tribe Nolinoideae). Kew Bull. 2012, 67, 697–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wilkin, P.; Suksathan, P.; Keeratikiat, K.; Van Welzen, P.; Wiland-Szymanska, J. A new species from Thailand and Burma, Dracaena kaweesakii Wilkin & Suksathan (Asparagaceae subfamily Nolinoideae). PhytoKeys 2013, 26, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zheng, D.J.; Xie, L.S.; Zhu, J.H.; Zhang, Z.L. Low genetic diversity and local adaptive divergence of Dracaena cambodiana (Liliaceae) populations associated with historical population bottlenecks and natural selection: An endangered long-lived tree endemic to Hainan Island, China. Plant Biol. 2012, 14, 828–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Denk, T.; Güner, H.T.; Grimm, G.W. From mesic to arid: Leaf epidermal features suggest preadaptation in Miocene dragon trees (Dracaena). Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 2014, 200, 211–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Adolt, R.; Pavliš, J. Age structure and growth of Dracaena cinnabari populations on Socotra. Trees-Struct. Funct. 2004, 18, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bayley Balfour, I. Botany of Socotra, 1st ed.; Royal Society of Edinburgh: Edinburgh, UK, 1888; p. 446. [Google Scholar]
  9. Almeida Pérez, R.S. Censo, distribución, habitat y estado de conservation de Dracaena tamaranae A.Marrero, R.S.González-Martín. Gran Canaria, Islas Canarias. Bot. Macarónesica 2003, 24, 39–56. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lavranos, J.J. A new, arborescent subspecies of Dracaena from Saudi Arabia. Cactus Succul. J. 2017, 89, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Attorre, F.; Francesconi, F.; Taleb, N.; Scholte, P.; Saed, A.; Alfo, M.; Bruno, F. Will dragonblood survive the next period of climate change? Current and future potential distribution of Dracaena cinnabari (Socotra, Yemen). Biol. Conserv. 2007, 138, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Van Damme, K.; Banfield, L. Past and present human impacts on the biodiversity of Socotra Island (Yemen): Implications for future conservation. Zool. Middle East 2011, 3, 31–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kamel, M.; Ghazaly, U.M.; Callmander, M.W. Conservation status of the Endangered Nubian dragon tree Dracaena ombet in Gebel Elba National Park, Egypt. Oryx 2015, 49, 704–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Habrová, H.; Čermák, Z.; Pavliš, J. Dragon’s blood tree-Threatened by overmaturity, not by extinction: Dynamics of a Dracaena cinnabari woodland in the mountains of Soqotra. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142, 772–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hubálková, I. Prediction of Dragon’s Blood Tree (Dracaena cinnabari Balf.) stand sample density on Soqotra Island. J. Landsc. Ecol. 2011, 4, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Habrová, H.; Pavliš, J. Dynamic response of woody vegetation on fencing protection in semi-arid areas; Case study: Pilot exclosure on the Firmihin Plateau, Socotra island. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 24, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Maděra, P.; Volařík, D.; Patočka, Z.; Kalivodová, H.; Divín, J.; Rejžek, M.; Vybíral, J.; Lvončík, S.; Jeník, D.; Hanáček, P.; et al. Sustainable land use management needed to conserve the dragon’s blood tree of Socotra Island, a vulnerable endemic umbrella species. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Maděra, P.; Habrová, H.; Šenfeldr, M.; Kholová, I.; Lvončík, S.; Ehrenbergerová, L.; Roth, M.; Nadezhdina, N.; Němec, P.; Rosenthal, J.; et al. Growth dynamics of endemic Dracaena cinnabari Balf. f. of Socotra Island suggest essential elements for a conservation strategy. Biológia 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kalivodová, H.; Culek, M.; Čermák, M.; Maděra, P.; Habrová, H. Potential importance of Socotra dragon’s blood tree cloud forests and woodlands for capturing horizontal precipitation. Rend. Lincei 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hildebrandt, A.; Eltahir, E.A.B. Forest on the edge: Seasonal cloud forest in Oman creates its own ecological niche. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006, 33, L11401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jura-Morawiec, J.; Marcinkiewicz, J. Wettability, water absorption and water storage in rosette leaves of the dragon tree (Dracaena draco L.). Planta 2020, 252, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Nadezhdina, N.; Nadezhdin, V. Are Dracaena nebulophytes able to drink atmospheric water? Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 139, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nadezhdina, N.; Al-Okaishi, A.; Madera, P. Sap flow measurements in a Socotra dragon’s blood tree (Dracaena cinnabari) in its area of origin. Trop. Plant Biol. 2018, 11, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Miller, A.G.; Morris, M.; Diccon, A.; Atkinson, R. Ethnoflora of the Soqotra Archipelago, 1st ed.; Royal Botanic Garden: Edinburgh, UK, 2004; p. 759. [Google Scholar]
  25. Al-Okaishi, A. Exploring the historical distribution of Dracaena cinnabari using ethnobotanical knowledge on Socotra Island, Yemen. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2021, 17, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pliny; Eichholz, D.E.; Jones, W.H.S.; Rackham, H. Pliny: Natural History; with an English Translation in Ten Volumes; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1961; pp. 115–116. [Google Scholar]
  27. Casson, L. The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1989; p. 169. [Google Scholar]
  28. Celiński, K.; Kijak, H.; Wiland-Szymańska, J. Complete chloroplast genome sequence and phylogenetic inference of the Canary Islands Dragon Tree (Dracaena draco L.). Forests 2020, 11, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Vahalík, P.; Drápela, K.; Procházková, A.; Patočka, Z.; Balková, M.; Šenfeldr, M.; Lengálová, K.; Kalivodová, H.; Vaníčková, L.; Ehrenbergerová, L.; et al. Metrics of growth habit derived from the 3D tree point cloud used for species determination—A new approach in botanical taxonomy tested on dragon tree group example. Forests 2020, 11, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bauerová, L.; Alem Munie, S.; Houšková, K.; Habrová, H. Germination of Dracaena cinnabari Balf.f. seeds under controlled temperature conditions. Forests 2020, 11, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Al-Okaishi, A. local management system of Dragon’s Blood Tree (Dracaena cinnabari Balf. f.) resin in Firmihin forest, Socotra Island, Yemen. Forests 2020, 11, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ding, X.; Zhu, J.; Wang, H.; Chen, H.; Mei, W. Dragon’s Blood from Dracaena cambodiana in China: Applied history and induction techniques toward formation mechanism. Forests 2020, 11, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Lengálová, K.; Kalivodová, H.; Habrová, H.; Maděra, P.; Tesfamariam, B.; Šenfeldr, M. First age-estimation model for Dracaena ombet and Dracaena draco subsp. caboverdeana. Forests 2020, 11, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Vahalík, P.; Patočka, Z.; Drápela, K.; Habrová, H.; Ehrenbergerová, L.; Lengálová, K.; Kalivodová, H.; Pompeiano Vaníčková, L.; Al-Shamahi, E.; Lupton, D.; et al. The conservation status and population mapping of the endangered Dracaena serrulata in the Dhofar Mountains, Oman. Forests 2020, 11, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Vasconcelos, R.; Pujol-Buxó, E.; Llorente, G.A.; Saeed, A.; Carranza, S. Micro-hotspots for conservation: An umbrella tree species for the unique socotran reptile fauna. Forests 2020, 11, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Maděra, P.; Forrest, A.; Hanáček, P.; Vahalík, P.; Gebauer, R.; Plichta, R.; Jupa, R.; Jansen Van Rensburg, J.; Morris, M.; Nadezhdina, N.; et al. What we know and what we do not know about dragon trees? Forests 2020, 11, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maděra, P.; Attorre, F.; Habrová, H.; Van Damme, K. Dragon Trees, Tertiary Relicts in Current Reality. Forests 2021, 12, 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060756

AMA Style

Maděra P, Attorre F, Habrová H, Van Damme K. Dragon Trees, Tertiary Relicts in Current Reality. Forests. 2021; 12(6):756. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060756

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maděra, Petr, Fabio Attorre, Hana Habrová, and Kay Van Damme. 2021. "Dragon Trees, Tertiary Relicts in Current Reality" Forests 12, no. 6: 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060756

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop