Author Contributions
Conceptualization, C.K.; methodology, C.K., J.S. and R.L.M.; experimental test, A.F. and C.K.; data analysis, C.K., M.S., A.F. and X.L.; writing—original draft preparation, C.K.; writing—review and editing, M.A., M.S. and X.L.; project administration, R.L.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Figure 1.
Experimental test setup of RS sample, and DIC positioning.
Figure 1.
Experimental test setup of RS sample, and DIC positioning.
Figure 2.
Sample preparation for aspect ratio (a) 3.0, (b) 4.5 and (c) 6.75 for Southern and Radiata pine.
Figure 2.
Sample preparation for aspect ratio (a) 3.0, (b) 4.5 and (c) 6.75 for Southern and Radiata pine.
Figure 3.
Examples of sound centred knots in samples.
Figure 3.
Examples of sound centred knots in samples.
Figure 4.
Samples for 0 mm, 20 mm and 57 mm projection.
Figure 4.
Samples for 0 mm, 20 mm and 57 mm projection.
Figure 5.
Boxplot showing effect of moisture content on RS strength (left) and modulus (right) of southern pine. The square in the boxplots shows the mean and different letter are from LSD test in the boxplots indicating the means between groups are significantly different (p-value equals 0.05).
Figure 5.
Boxplot showing effect of moisture content on RS strength (left) and modulus (right) of southern pine. The square in the boxplots shows the mean and different letter are from LSD test in the boxplots indicating the means between groups are significantly different (p-value equals 0.05).
Figure 6.
Load vs. displacement curves for all tested samples, and relevant failure modes of the samples subjected to various moisture contents.
Figure 6.
Load vs. displacement curves for all tested samples, and relevant failure modes of the samples subjected to various moisture contents.
Figure 7.
Rolling shear properties for various MOE groups, (a) rolling shear strength, (b) rolling shear modulus (southern pine).
Figure 7.
Rolling shear properties for various MOE groups, (a) rolling shear strength, (b) rolling shear modulus (southern pine).
Figure 8.
Example of the 6 MOE groupings and their typical failure mode type.
Figure 8.
Example of the 6 MOE groupings and their typical failure mode type.
Figure 9.
Rolling shear properties for various MOE (radiata pine).
Figure 9.
Rolling shear properties for various MOE (radiata pine).
Figure 10.
Effect of aspect ratio on the mean values of RS modulus (top) and strength (bottom).
Figure 10.
Effect of aspect ratio on the mean values of RS modulus (top) and strength (bottom).
Figure 11.
Load vs displacement plot of (a) Radiata pine and (b) Southern pine samples.
Figure 11.
Load vs displacement plot of (a) Radiata pine and (b) Southern pine samples.
Figure 12.
Example of (a) 3.0, (b) 6.75 and (c) 4.5 aspect ratio failure modes.
Figure 12.
Example of (a) 3.0, (b) 6.75 and (c) 4.5 aspect ratio failure modes.
Figure 13.
Boxplot showing rolling shear modulus (left) and strength (right) for various species.
Figure 13.
Boxplot showing rolling shear modulus (left) and strength (right) for various species.
Figure 14.
Linear regression between density and rolling shear properties.
Figure 14.
Linear regression between density and rolling shear properties.
Figure 15.
Boxplot showing effect of RS modulus (left) and strength (right) for various species.
Figure 15.
Boxplot showing effect of RS modulus (left) and strength (right) for various species.
Figure 16.
Load vs displacement curves, and relevant failure modes of the samples due to various projection length.
Figure 16.
Load vs displacement curves, and relevant failure modes of the samples due to various projection length.
Table 1.
Test program with sample dimensions, timber species and number of test specimens.
Table 1.
Test program with sample dimensions, timber species and number of test specimens.
Key Variable | Species | Cross-Section (mm × mm) | Projection Length (mm) | Target MGP MOE (MPa) | Nos. Samples |
---|
Moisture content (8%, 12% and 16%) | Southern pine | 135 × 30 | 56.6 | 10,000 | 15 |
MOE (parallel to grain) | Radiata pine (Pinus radiata) | 135 × 30 | 56.6 | 7000–15,000 | 22 |
10,000 | 15 |
Southern pine (Pinus caribaea/Pinus elliotti) | 135 × 30 | 56.6 | 6000 | 15 |
7000 | 15 |
8000 | 15 |
9000 | 15 |
10,000 | 15 |
12,000 | 15 |
Aspect ratio | Radiata pine | 90 × 30 | 79.1 | 10,000 | 15 |
135 × 20 | 36.5 | 10,000 | 15 |
Southern pine | 90 × 30 | 79.1 | 10,000 | 15 |
135 × 20 | 36.5 | 10,000 | 15 |
Species | Radiata pine | 135 × 30 | 56.6 | 10,000 | 15 |
Southern pine | 10,000 | 15 |
Hoop pine (Araucaria cunninghamii) | 10,000 | 15 |
Knottiness | Radiata pine | 135 × 30 | 56.6 | 10,000 | 15 |
Southern pine | 10,000 | 15 |
Hoop pine | 10,000 | 15 |
Projection length | Southern pine | 135 × 30 | 0 | 10,000 | 7 |
20 | 10,000 | 7 |
56.6 | 10,000 | 15 |
Table 2.
Rolling shear modulus (Gr) and strength (fr) of southern pine with varying moisture content.
Table 2.
Rolling shear modulus (Gr) and strength (fr) of southern pine with varying moisture content.
Mechanical Property | 8% fr | 8% Gr | 12% fr | 12% Gr | 16% fr | 16% Gr |
---|
Mean (MPa) | 2.93 | 95.01 | 3.20 | 80.60 | 2.61 | 60.66 |
CoV (%) | 13 | 10 | 10 | 16 | 9 | 11 |
5th percentile (MPa) | 2.42 | 84.22 | 2.64 | 61.38 | 2.31 | 50.44 |
Table 3.
Effect of moisture content on the RS properties.
Table 3.
Effect of moisture content on the RS properties.
| Block | Standard Error (SE) | R2 | Sum of Squares (SS) | F-Value | p-Value |
---|
fr | Without considering the effect of board | 0.38 | 0.10 | MC (0.72), Error (6.1) | MC (4.94) | 0.032 |
Considering effect of board | 0.29 | 0.64 | MC (0.55), Board (3.67), Error (2.43) | MC (6.34), Board (3.02) | MC (0.018), Board (0.006) |
Gr | Without considering the effect of board | 10.05 | 0.67 | MC (8513), Error (4215) | MC (84.82) | 0.000 |
Considering effect of board | 6.93 | 0.89 | MC (8095), Board (2867), Error (1348) | MC (168.11), Board (4.25) | MC (0.000), Board (0.001) |
Table 4.
Rolling shear properties of southern pine with varying MOE.
Table 4.
Rolling shear properties of southern pine with varying MOE.
MOE Group | 6 GPa | 7 GPa | 8 GPa | 10 GPa | 12 GPa |
---|
fr | Gr | fr | Gr | fr | Gr | fr | Gr | fr | Gr |
---|
Mean (Mpa) | 3.31 | 97.90 | 3.06 | 98.87 | 3.22 | 85.65 | 3.05 | 87.12 | 3.36 | 98.52 |
CoV (%) | 15 | 24 | 22 | 15 | 19 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 13 | 10 |
5th percentile (Mpa) | 2.55 | 66.39 | 2.03 | 75.57 | 2.23 | 72.46 | 2.33 | 68.97 | 2.65 | 83.75 |
Table 5.
Effect of MOE on the RS properties (southern pine).
Table 5.
Effect of MOE on the RS properties (southern pine).
| Block | Standard Error (SE) | R2 | Sum of Squares (SS) | F-Value | p-Value |
---|
fr | Without considering the effect of board | 0.55 | 0.002 | MOE (0.0425), Error (22.45) | MOE (0.14) | 0.711 |
Considering effect of board | 0.26 | 0.87 | MOE (0.029), Board (19.61), Error (2.84) | MOE (0.42), Board (8.85) | MOE (0.523), Board (0.000) |
Gr | Considering effect of board | 13.7 | 0.61 | MOE (78.9), Board (11841), Error (7687) | MOE (0.42), Board (1.91) | MOE (0.520), Board (0.025) |
Table 6.
Rolling shear properties with varying AR.
Table 6.
Rolling shear properties with varying AR.
| AR Group | AR 3.0 | AR 4.5 | AR 6.75 |
---|
| fr | Gr | fr | Gr | fr | Gr |
---|
Southern pine | Mean (MPa) | 2.70 | 85.54 | 3.05 | 87.12 | 3.25 | 88.72 |
CoV (%) | 15 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 13 | 26 |
5th percentile (MPa) | 2.18 | 72.28 | 2.33 | 68.97 | 2.82 | 57.83 |
Radiata pine | Mean (MPa) | 2.39 | 73.38 | 2.64 | 74.74 | 2.87 | 73.97 |
CoV (%) | 10 | 16 | 17 | 14 | 16 | 30 |
5th percentile (MPa) | 1.96 | 67.45 | 1.79 | 68.43 | 2.08 | 66.61 |
Table 7.
Effect of AR on the RS properties (southern pine).
Table 7.
Effect of AR on the RS properties (southern pine).
| Block | Standard Error (SE) | R2 | Sum of Squares (SS) | F-Value | p-Value |
---|
fr | Considering effect of board | 0.32 | 0.68 | AR (1.53), Board (4.92), Error (3.28) | AR (15.37), Board (4.49) | AR (0.000), Board (0.000) |
Gr | Considering effect of board | 16.89 | 0.17 | AR (98.8), Board (1875), Error (9408) | AR (0.35), Board (0.60) | AR (0.560), Board (0.817) |
Table 8.
Rolling shear properties with varying species.
Table 8.
Rolling shear properties with varying species.
| Species Group | Radiata Pine | Southern Pine | Hoop Pine |
---|
| fr | Gr | fr | Gr | fr | Gr |
---|
No knots | Mean (MPa) | 2.64 | 74.74 | 3.05 | 87.12 | 3.68 | 99.67 |
CoV (%) | 17 | 14 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.11 |
5th percentile (MPa) | 1.79 | 61.71 | 2.33 | 68.97 | 2.34 | 84.93 |
Knots | Mean (MPa) | 3.19 | 87.57 | 3.83 | 118.69 | 4.53 | 154.73 |
CoV (%) | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 0.16 |
5th percentile (MPa) | 2.18 | 79.42 | 2.70 | 109.06 | 2.60 | 147.32 |
Table 9.
Rolling shear properties with varying species.
Table 9.
Rolling shear properties with varying species.
Projection Group | 0 mm | 20 mm | 57 mm |
---|
| fr | Gr | fr | Gr | fr | Gr |
---|
Mean (MPa) | 3.02 | 94.84 | 3.50 | 104.82 | 3.05 | 87.12 |
CoV (%) | 18 | 21 | 17 | 21 | 15 | 15 |
5th percentile (MPa) | 2.27 | 72.22 | 2.77 | 73.10 | 2.33 | 68.97 |
Table 10.
Effect of projection length on the RS properties (southern pine) for fr and Gr, respectively.
Table 10.
Effect of projection length on the RS properties (southern pine) for fr and Gr, respectively.
| Block | Standard Error (SE) | R2 | Sum of Squares (SS) | F-Value | p-Value |
---|
fr | Without considering effect of board | 0.52 | 0.14 | PR (1.11), Error (7.0) | PR (2.06) | PR (0.15) |
Considering effect of board | 0.19 | 0.94 | PR (0.80), Board (7.53), Error (0.51) | PR (22.0), Board (16.05) | PR (0.000), Board (0.000) |
Gr | Without considering effect of board | 17.13 | 0.17 | PR (1518), Error (7625) | PR (2.59) | PR (0.094) |
Considering effect of board | 10.03 | 0.85 | PR (349), Board (6979), Error (1408) | PR (3.47), Board (5.34) | PR (0.084), Board (0.002) |