Next Article in Journal
Diurnal and Sex Ratio Flight Activity of Rare Cavity-Dweller Eucnemis capucina Ahrens, 1812 (Coleoptera: Eucnemidae) in Lowland Deciduous Forest: Case Study from Czech Republic
Next Article in Special Issue
A 1640-Year Vegetation and Fire History of the Lake Haixihai Catchment in Northwestern Yunnan, Southwest China
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Moisture Performance of Tall Wood Building Envelope under Climate Change in Different Canadian Climatic Regions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pyrenean Silver Fir Forests Retain Legacies of Past Disturbances and Climate Change in Their Growth, Structure and Composition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Disturbance and Succession in Early to Mid-Holocene Northern English Forests: Palaeoecological Evidence for Disturbance of Woodland Ecosystems by Mesolithic Hunter-Gatherers

by
James B. Innes
1,* and
Jeffrey J. Blackford
2
1
Geography Department, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
2
School of Humanities, Social Science and Law, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2023, 14(4), 719; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040719
Submission received: 2 March 2023 / Revised: 27 March 2023 / Accepted: 27 March 2023 / Published: 31 March 2023

Abstract

:
Forest succession can be monitored in the present, modelled for the future, but also reconstructed in the past on the records of forest history, including through the use of palaeo-ecological techniques. Longer-term records from pollen data can show changes over centennial and millennial timescales that are impacted by climate, migration or soil development. Having knowledge of previous phases of post-disturbance seral stages of woodland regeneration however, as after fire, can provide insights regarding successional process and function over short-term decadal timescales. The aim of this paper is to test the high-resolution pollen record as a source of new insights into processes of succession, assisted by the supplementary data of microscopic charcoal analyses. On short-term timescales, multiple phases of forest disturbance and then recovery have been identified in early to mid-Holocene peat records in northern England, many from the uplands but also from lowland areas. We identify and describe a typology of recovery patterns, including the composition and rate of recovery, and then test the processes and factors that impacted on different seral trajectories, concentrating on fire disturbance which might have had a natural origin, or might have been caused by pre-agricultural Mesolithic hunter-gatherers. Factors considered include the spatial location and intensity of the fire event, the duration of the disturbance phase, the structure and dynamics of the successional regeneration vegetation communities and the pre-disturbance tree cover. Data from examples of fire disturbance of woodland have been examined from both upland and lowland sites in northern England and indicate that they had different successional pathways after disturbance. Fire disturbances in the denser lowland forests were mostly single burn events followed by natural successions and regeneration to forest, whereas fire disturbances in the upland woods usually showed continued or repetitive fire pressure after the initial burning, arresting succession so that vegetation was maintained in a shrub phase, often dominated by Corylus, for an extended period of time until disturbance ceased. This creation of a kind of prolonged, almost plagioclimax, ‘fire-coppice’ hazel stage suggests controlled rather than natural successional pathways, and strongly suggests that Mesolithic foragers were the fire starters in the upland English woodlands where hazel was naturally common and could be maintained in abundance in later-stage successions, along with other edible plants, for human use. All post-fire seral stages would have been attractive to game animals, providing a reliable food source that would have been of great benefit to hunter-gatherer populations.

1. Introduction

The concept of the Holocene temperate wildwood, postglacial primary forest that has developed over millennia through processes of immigration and autogenic succession until stability and equilibrium have been achieved, is one that has been fundamental in palaeoecology. This forest biome characterises the mesocratic and climatic optimum phase of an interglacial [1,2,3], and has been shown by pollen analysis of Holocene sediments as well as those from several past interglacials [4,5] to comprise a rich arboreal community of broadleaf deciduous trees, with tree migration rates [6] and climatic tolerances [7] determining the timing and composition of the fully established climax forest, which represents the terminal stage of primary forest succession [8]. Coniferous boreal forests form the climax biome at higher latitudes. Climatic constraints rather than rate of migration appear to determine the composition of postglacial forests, so that latitude plays a major role regarding which trees become dominant [9], coupled with factors such as geology, altitude and edaphic conditions which might determine local tree populations and produce polyclimaxes which varied along environmental gradients [10]. Autogenic successions in established forest communities are slow to bring changes in biome components or abundance, because of the long lifespans of individual trees and the inherent stability and inertia of the forest ecosystem [11,12,13]. Exogenic factors, however, primarily disturbance impacts, might bring about rapid changes in forest composition [14], forcing ecosystem regeneration and often converting primary to secondary woodland and even deflecting post-disturbance seral successions towards plagioseres such as scrub, bog or heath when tree regeneration fails or is incomplete [15,16]. Natural disturbances would have occurred in the forest throughout the early and mid-Holocene [17,18] and these would have operated at various scales, from the death and fall of individual trees or populations of particular taxa through disease, changing edaphic factors or senescence, to widespread tree-throw due to major storm events [19,20,21]. The actions of large herbivores could also have impacted the forest [22], although probably to a lesser extent than in previous interglacials [23]. Natural fires would have occurred [24], particularly during drier climatic phases [25] and these would have been at differing intensities, from light surface or canopy fires to larger wildfire, although larger scale deforestation of large areas would have been rare [26]. Although impossible to prove, it is very likely that fire in the hands of Mesolithic hunter-gatherers was regularly and deliberately applied to the forest [27], particularly in the Late Mesolithic, reducing tree cover and setting in train vegetation successions that lasted several decades as the ecosystem reverted towards woodland. It would have had the effect of permanently changing forest structure and composition from its natural, undisturbed state and constructing new ecological niches and landscapes [28] which favoured the foragers by increasing food and other resources [29,30,31,32], in the same way that the earliest Neolithic agriculturalists during the Mesolithic–Neolithic transition would have impacted the forest by farming within it [33]. There is evidence [34] that Mesolithic groups employed woodland management techniques such as coppicing [32,35,36] that would have stalled or deflected natural forest succession. In this paper we consider some highly detailed palynological evidence for the nature of forest succession following four of these Late Mesolithic age, mid-Holocene disturbances in northern England, using fine interval sampling [37] to provide decadal or better time-series data [38]. Using indicator taxa [39,40] we compare the palaeoecology of these disturbances to the neoecology of post-disturbance community succession in deciduous forest, with the aim of elucidating the nature of the Mesolithic-age disturbances and informing the understanding of Late Mesolithic land use in different parts of the mid-Holocene forests.

2. Background

2.1. The Natural Wildwood

The nature of the primeval English mid-Holocene climax forest, or wildwood (Urwald), has been the subject of much debate. It is acknowledged that the forest would have had a mixed species composition and would have varied across the country under a range of influencing environmental factors, rather than being the same everywhere [41], as shown by pollen analyses [42]. Altitude was a regulating factor, and Birks [43] has estimated the percentage of tree cover on the summits of the highest uplands as being low. The greatest altitude at which macrofossil tree stumps are found, around 500 m in the Pennines of northern England for example [44], is well below the maximum altitude of that upland. Lower uplands such as the North York Moors, however, should have been fully tree covered but pollen analysis suggests an open woodland at most, so that some limiting factor was preventing expansion of full forest cover to these upland summits. This prompted Simmons [45] to suggest the existence of a ‘hyper-forest’ zone above a tree line that was maintained by natural or anthropogenic factors, and which formed an ecotone between the highest ground and the woodland of lower altitudes. Over most of the landscape, however, where forest was the dominant vegetation, the accepted model has been one of a high forest structure [46,47,48], and this has been generally supported by landscape scale pollen-based reconstructions, e.g., [49,50]. There are opposing views, however, regarding the degree to which the forest canopy was naturally fully closed or partly open before any disturbance by human or other agency [51,52,53,54]. Knowledge of the natural composition and structure of the forest clearly must serve as the baseline upon which any study of post-disturbance succession must be based, and palynology remains the main technique by which prehistoric forest history and structure can be investigated in any detail [55,56], with intuitive reconstructions increasingly improved by pollen modelling techniques [49,57,58,59]. It can also occasionally be supplemented by macrofossil studies in the rare locations where a population of tree stumps and other large remains have been preserved [60,61,62,63], usually beneath peat deposits, revealing palaeo-woodland density and species composition. Other proxies such as molluscan or insect remains [64,65] can also be useful in the reconstruction of prehistoric forests. Vera’s [51] hypothesis is that the actions of large wild herbivores could have impacted on arboreal woodland vegetation and so created or maintained openings in the forest, and that the natural forest was therefore not closed canopy but a form of partly open parkland, or at least with large, open glades between individual trees. Although the megafauna of previous interglacials was not present in the Holocene, the aurochs and bison were active in the early and mid-Holocene forest, with red deer, and could have had an impact on natural tree density and successions [22,66,67]. Latałowa et al. [68], however, in the modern Białowieża Primeval Forest of eastern Europe, which contains bison and other large herbivores but no livestock, recorded a dense, closed-canopy structure with very few gaps, not supporting the Vera hypothesis. Grazing and browsing after woodland disturbance of whatever cause, however, can certainly prevent or at least retard natural tree regeneration and so maintain open areas and prolong herbivore activity [69], which should be visible in pollen diagrams [70], which should also provide information regarding the density of the pre-disturbance forest. Although a range of other causes of forest disturbance must have existed [17,71] including storms [20] and disease outbreaks [21], it is likely that the activities of Mesolithic hunter-gatherers, as suggested by Simmons [27] and other authors, e.g., [72,73,74] could have been a major cause of forest opening in the early and mid-Holocene in England, at least in some parts of the landscape.

2.2. Fire and Hunter-Gatherers

Study of the activities of recent hunter-gatherer societies has shown that the use of fire to modify temperate forest ecosystems was a common practice that was systematic, well planned and integral to their land-use and economic strategies [75,76], particularly in North America [77,78] but also elsewhere [79,80]. Indigenous burning was an important land management tool that could be set to open burned patches of various sizes and altered the forest to human advantage, often long-term [81]. In the same way, the similar benefits that would have accrued to Mesolithic hunter-gatherers in early and mid-Holocene England through the application of fire to diversify the forested landscape would have been considerable; the removal of dense undergrowth from the primary forest to increase visibility and mobility, the creation of a mosaic vegetation landscape with a range of resources and woodland products, and the increased productivity and concentration of plant and animal foods within the vegetation communities at various stages of the woodland regeneration cycle. Macroscopic charcoal layers are often present in Mesolithic-age sediments in both upland, e.g., [82,83] and lowland, e.g., [84,85] contexts, and the presence of microscopic charcoal [86,87,88,89,90,91] in many Mesolithic age peats suggests that fire was a regular occurrence in at least some areas of the early and mid-Holocene forest, in particular in the uplands and around wetlands. Natural fire from lightning would have occurred in these landscapes, although the English forests were not particularly prone to ignition and would not carry fire well, particularly in the damp lowland forests [41,92,93]. Fire would, however, occasionally have escaped into the woodland from Mesolithic campfires and other domestic situations by accident [94] while the purposeful and frequent controlled application of fire to the forest by Mesolithic people seems very likely. While some parts of the landscape might have been selected for more intense or regular fire disturbance, such as the waterside or the uplands where the forest might have been naturally lighter, the palaeoecological evidence indicates that the English forest in the first half of the Holocene, whatever its natural density, was undergoing limited intensity but constant modification by fire in the hands of Mesolithic hunter-gatherers. The selection of more favourable sites for burning, such as upland spring-heads or lake margins where animals might naturally congregate, could mean that such sites were burned repeatedly [15,27], truncating successional pathways before regeneration could be completed and returning the site to its most economically productive state. As with some modern foragers, the burning might have had more than an economic purpose, perhaps a social or ritual cleansing role to maintain forest health, control it and make it less intimidating [95], although that can only be surmised.

2.3. Palynology and Forest Successions

Scale is an all-important factor in the palynological reconstruction of past forest vegetation [59,96] and sediment sites should be selected for analysis on this basis [97]. The study of lakes or large peat bog deposits with big pollen source areas is appropriate for landscape-scale reconstructions over the long time periods of hundreds or even thousands of years at which climate-driven forest successions operate [98,99,100,101]. Large scale woodland removal caused by extreme tree clearance events such as major storms [20] will also be observable in such sediment archives. Small spatial scale analyses from sites within the forest, however, are required for the study of post-disturbance secondary forest successions which occur at the stand or patch scale [102,103], such as palaeoecological responses to localised fire events [104,105]. The study of site-specific forest successions therefore requires sediments from within forest stands, under the canopy in small hollows [1,106,107,108] or at spring heads [109], so that their pollen source area would have been limited [110,111], probably only from about 30 m around the site [96,112], although some research suggests a figure of over 50 m might be more realistic [113]. Consideration must also be made regarding the pollen productivity of different trees under forest stand conditions [1]. Several such studies have been undertaken and have provided spatially detailed data on longer-term forest succession [114,115,116]. Such sediments can be highly compact, but adjacent duplicate core analyses have shown that they contain a detailed and reproducible pollen record [117]. Fine temporal resolution is also required if the various seral stages which comprise the regeneration niche are to be understood, as these could represent vegetation growth of little more than a decade or so at most. This requires very fine sub-sampling intervals in the sediment so that each contiguous level analysed comprises only a few years’ pollen accumulation and rapid ecological changes can be recorded [37,118], including the dynamics of the local forest stand canopy. The interpretation of such palaeoecological data in terms of post-disturbance seral plant communities requires close reference to each taxon’s neoecology in analogous contemporary situations [119,120]. Several such high temporal resolution studies have been completed on mid-Holocene sediments, where sub-sampling intervals as low as one or two millimetres have been employed, depending upon the degree of humification of the sediment, and they have all provided highly detailed time-series records [38] of vegetation history and forest succession palaeoecology. Some have been aimed at investigating the Elm Decline and the Mesolithic–Neolithic Transition [121,122,123,124,125], while others have concentrated on either Early [126] or Late Mesolithic-age forest disturbances [127,128,129,130].
Such high-resolution pollen analyses, coupled with microcharcoal analyses, should be able to elucidate the scale and location of disturbance, as well as the rate, structure and pathways of post-disturbance successions, whether they were natural or controlled and whether there were differences in different parts of the landscape. A continuing literature search has revealed so far over a hundred sites in England with Mesolithic-age pollen diagrams which contain evidence of woodland disturbance that set in train regeneration successions. A large majority of them include macro- and/or microscopic charcoal associated with the disturbance. Of those that do not, most are sites where charcoal analysis was not undertaken. It seems that fire was the main initiator of post-disturbance successions in Mesolithic times in England. Very few examples of disturbance have been examined using fine resolution sampling intervals, however, and in this paper we use fine sampling to examine in detail some of these phases of fire disturbance, to clarify the nature of the successions which followed fire, whether natural or human-induced, and see whether there are any differences among them that can assist interpretation of their source of ignition.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Methodology

For this study, four English pollen sites have been selected for examination, two from the lowlands and two from the uplands, where high-resolution pollen analyses have been carried out into Mesolithic age, early to mid-Holocene sediments. Pollen diagrams were produced for the entire profile at each site, but only the post-disturbance pollen data are presented here. Pollen analyses were undertaken following standard techniques, with preparation and identifications following Moore et al. [131] and nomenclature following Stace [132]. Pollen counts always exceeded 400 land pollen grains. Pollen diagrams were constructed using TILIA and TILIAGRAPH [133,134] and are presented as percentages of total tree pollen as forest history is the object of study [135]. The components of the tree pollen sum vary between sites as some trees, mainly Betula and Alnus, can be superabundant in the local pollen rain because of their wetland edge habitat. Corylus and all other taxa are excluded from the counting sum.
Microcharcoal particles were counted at each profile as a pollen/charcoal ratio according to the method described by Innes and Simmons [136]. Particles that passed through the 180 μm pollen preparation sieve were counted relative to the pollen count, with those around 30 μm in diameter regarded as the basic measurement unit, so that a piece of 90 μm would be counted as three units. All pieces smaller than 30 μm were aggregated to produce countable data. Separate curves for different size ranges are not produced as fragmentation of particles will occur during the laboratory preparation [137]. This consistent methodology allows direct comparison between profiles.
Well humified peat is required for viable fine resolution palynology [37] and the peat at all four sites meets this requirement. Full lithologies from the profiles are described in Supplementary Table S1 and the relevant numbered sedimentary units from Table S1 are shown in the lithology columns on the fine resolution diagrams.

3.2. Radiocarbon Dating

Radiocarbon ages are available for all of the four sites (Table 1) and prove the Late Mesolithic-age context of the finely sampled sections. They have been calibrated using OxCal4.4 and IntCal20 [138] and the mid-range calibrated yr. BC ages and laboratory codes are shown in the text after the radiocarbon date citation. The dates from Sniggery Wood were radiometric on bulk peat samples, whereas more recently obtained dates from Little Hawes Water, North Gill and Bonfield Gill Head are AMS dates.

4. Results

The four pollen sites that have been selected for examination are located on Figure 1, the two lowland sites being on the coastal plain of North West England and the two upland sites on the North York Moors upland in North East England. They provide a clear altitudinal contrast within northern England, a region that is known to have been heavily occupied and utilised by Late Mesolithic people [139,140,141,142].

4.1. Sniggery Wood

The Sniggery Wood pollen profile (UK grid reference SD307015; lat. 53°30′20.2″ N long. 3°02′46.8″ W) lies in Merseyside near the coast of lowland northwest England (Figure 1) at a surface altitude of 6 m above sea level. Its pollen diagram was constructed at 4 cm intervals [143] and one level of Late Mesolithic age, dated soon after 5770 ± 50 BP [4609 ± 117 cal. BC; SRR-2699], showed evidence of woodland disturbance and regeneration, with ruderal weed grains, increased Corylus and other heliophyte tree percentages and then restoration of deciduous woodland cover. Subsequent pollen analyses of this phase at finer resolution intervals of 5 mm, shown in Figure 2, has clarified its disturbance and regeneration history.

4.1.1. Pollen Zones

The following four pollen zones are recognised.
  • SW-1
The lowermost zone has high levels of tree and shrub pollen, at almost 70% of total land pollen, although there are high Poaceae frequencies of almost 30%, probably caused by the site’s near-coastal location, or by grasses growing on the wetland surface. Quercus and Alnus are the main tree taxa, with Corylus the main shrub. Herbaceous frequencies other than grasses are very low and are confined to wetland types. The local vegetation would have been woodland, probably open to some degree.
  • SW-2
This zone records a major decline in Quercus frequencies, Alnus being little affected, and a slight rise in Corylus percentages. Total trees and shrubs decline to about 50% of total land pollen. Microcharcoal frequencies rise to a peak at the start of the zone and decline thereafter. Melampyrum enters the assemblage, rising to a peak in mid-zone, while a wide range of open ground weeds is recorded, including ruderal types including Artemisia, Taraxacum-type, Chenopodiaceae, Rumex and Senecio-type. Grassland weeds like Plantago lanceolata and Potentilla-type increase, and Poaceae increases slightly. Pteridium is increased and some heliophyte shrubs occur late in the zone.
  • SW-3
In this zone Quercus values remain lowered, but Alnus is restored to its levels of zone SW-1. Corylus increases markedly to almost 30%, while Salix, Fraxinus and Calluna are consistently present. Total tree and shrub frequencies return to their zone SW-1 levels of about 70%, but with shrub pollen a more important component. Poaceae declines and the range of herb pollen is greatly reduced, with almost all of the open ground and ruderal taxa absent and wetland herbs as the main contributors. Microcharcoal and Melampyrum quickly fade from the assemblage. Pteridium remains present in low values.
  • SW-4
In the uppermost zone Quercus percentages are restored to at least the frequencies of zone SW-1, as are those of Betula and Alnus. Tilia becomes consistently present. Corylus percentages fall sharply to zone SW-1 levels. Heliophyte shrub pollen declines, although Fraxinus remains consistently present. Herb pollen contributes about 30%, again mainly by Poacese. All herb taxa are now wetland types such as Apiaceae, with Senecio-type pollen, probably wetland members of the Asteraceae family. There are no dryland open ground weeds.

4.1.2. Diagram Interpretation

Ulmus percentages are low but consistent and there is a clear Elm Decline much higher in the profile at 56 cm, so this disturbance phase occurred in Mesolithic age times. Zone SW-1 had woodland vegetation, which was perhaps not closed canopy, depending on the origin of the grass pollen, which might have come from wetland communities rather than woodland glades. This oak/alder woodland was disturbed by the fire event recorded at the start of zone SW-2, which was nearby even though microcharcoal values are not very high, as pollen of many weeds was able to be transported to the sampling site. Fire-favoured Melampyrum is another signature of the burning [144], but some unstable open ground must have been created to account for the ruderal weed assemblage of zone SW-2, and the degree of Quercus decline suggests some significant recession of the local oakwood. Regeneration in zone SW-3 seems to have shaded out the open ground as the weed assemblage is absent in zone SW-3 and shrubs, mainly hazel but also ash and willow, appear to have occupied the scene of disturbance. Regeneration of woodland was completed in zone SW-4 with Quercus, and lesser Betula and Alnus, dominating the dryland vegetation. While woodland was restored to pre-disturbance levels, with hazel once again a minor component, its composition seems to have changed slightly with Fraxinus and Tilia now rare but consistent members. The pollen record indicates a single episode of fire disturbance of woodland, followed by the uninterrupted regeneration of woodland through ruderal, then Corylus-dominated shrub communities.

4.2. Little Hawes Water

The Little Hawes Water pollen profile (UK grid reference SD480768; lat. 54°11′03.6″ N long. 2°47′53.9″ W) lies in North Lancashire at a surface altitude of 7 m. above sea level (Figure 1) and is part of a basin peat deposit that surrounds a small lake [84] in a limestone catchment near the coast. The peat contains charcoal layers which record burning around the lake and one, at core ESE3, was selected for detailed study. Pollen analysis showed that vegetation disturbance was associated with the inwash of charcoal into the peat basin, caused by the fire event. The charcoal layer at 67–68 cm depth was dated (Table 1) to 6865 ± 58 BP [5761 ± 117 BC; Wk-20078], well within the Late Mesolithic period. Subsequent pollen analyses of this phase at finer resolution intervals of 2 mm, shown in Figure 3, have clarified its disturbance and regeneration history.

4.2.1. Pollen Zones

The following four pollen zones are recognised.
  • ESE3-1
This zone contains pre-disturbance assemblages. Microcharcoal frequencies are very low, although present, and the pollen assemblage is dominated by arboreal pollen, particularly Quercus and Alnus, as well as Corylus which together comprise almost 90% of total pollen. Herb pollen values are very low, with only Poaceae significant, although isolated grains of some ruderals, like Plantago lanceolata and Ranunculus-type, do occur.
  • ESE3-2
This zone records a fall in the frequencies of Quercus and Alnus, with total tree and shrub pollen reduced to 70% of the total assemblage, and tree pollen contributing only 50%. Corylus is not much increased until the end of the zone. Poaceae and other herbs mainly benefit from the fire disturbance that the peak microcharcoal values represent. A wide range of ruderal weed taxa occurs, with Artemisia, Potentilla-type, Rumex and Senecio-type prominent, but Melampyrum shows peak values of almost 10% of total land pollen. Pteridium also increases and Calluna occurs late in the zone.
  • ESE3-3
Arboreal pollen frequencies remain at around 50% of total land pollen, with Quercus and Alnus showing no recovery, but Corylus is greatly increased. Light-demanding tall shrub/tree taxa Fraxinus and Salix are increased. While the number of herbaceous types recorded remains high, overall herb frequencies fall to a total of only 10% of total land pollen. Melampyrum and Poaceae in particular fall to low levels. Pteridium increases its frequencies while microcharcoal falls gradually through the zone.
  • ESE3-4
Only occasional microcharcoal counts are recorded, while Quercus and Alnus are restored to the pre-disturbance levels of zone ESE3-1. Corylus frequencies decline to those of pre-disturbance and total tree and shrub pollen again contributes 90% of the total assemblage. Most ruderal herb taxa cease to be recorded, with the remaining herbs more of wetland type than open ground. Pteridium is also reduced. Poaceae, with Cyperaceae, is the main herb type recorded.

4.2.2. Diagram Interpretation

Although not high, the substantial and consistent Ulmus pollen values throughout the diagram show it to be of Pre-Ulmus Decline age, confirming the Mesolithic-age radiocarbon date of 6865 ± 58 BP in the lower profile. The pollen record describes a disturbance event, initiated by a fire in the nearby catchment at the ESE3-1/ESE3-2 boundary, and the subsequent vegetation regeneration and recovery of woodland cover. As at Sniggery Wood and in many other mid-Holocene woodland disturbance pollen phases the pyrophyte Melampyrum is favoured in the initial phase of regeneration, along with ruderal colonisers of bare ground, such as Artemisia, Taraxacum-type and Senecio-type, and several weeds which will have responded to the newly opened area. The second phase of regeneration, ESE-3, sees the increase in heliophyte shrub taxa as recovery continued, particularly Corylus. Although in greatly reduced frequencies, open ground herbs still occur, which might be because of the catchment’s limestone soils taking longer to stabilise than heavier soils might. The later stages of regeneration in ESE3-3 records the expansion of tall shrubs and secondary trees on the site of disturbance as regeneration towards woodland continued and light levels reaching the ground fell. The final zone records the restoration of woodland cover, with vegetation communities returning almost exactly to the pre-disturbance state. At 90% of total land pollen, it must represent virtually closed canopy woodland, with hazel probably forming a canopy component on the limestone catchment soils. The Little Hawes Water evidence indicates a single episode of fire disturbance of closed woodland, followed by a unidirectional and uninterrupted regeneration of dense woodland through ruderal, tall herb and shrub communities.

4.3. North Gill

The North Gill pollen profile NG7 (UK grid reference NZ726008; lat. 54°23′51.0″ N long. 0°52′59.8″ W) lies within stream valley peat that has formed around a springhead at a surface altitude of 370 m above sea level near the summit plateau of the North York Moors (Figure 1) in North Yorkshire, North East England [109]. Bracketing radiocarbon dates (Table 1) of 6735 ± 45 BP [5643 ± 80 cal. BC; SRR-3657] at 82 cm and 5645 ± 45 BP [4471 ± 111 cal. BC; SRR-3655] at 76 cm show that the profile lies well within the Late Mesolithic period. Coarser interval palynology recorded fire disturbance phases, and subsequent pollen analyses of one of the phases at finer resolution intervals of 2 mm, shown in Figure 4, has clarified its disturbance history.

4.3.1. Pollen Zones

The following nine pollen zones are recognised. The approximate ages of the boundaries of the phases of disturbance could be interpolated from the calibrated means of the bracketing date, although these can only be approximate given the ranges of uncertainty on the calibrations.
  • NG7-1
This zone shows no evidence of active disturbance, with microcharcoal frequencies very low and with only sporadic records of open ground herbs. Local vegetation was Quercus-Alnus-Ulmus woodland with some Tilia, although it must have been open, as there are substantial values for Calluna, Poaceae and Corylus all perhaps due to the high altitude or a legacy of earlier disturbance unless the heather and grasses were growing on the bog surface.
  • NG7-2
This zone records fire disturbance with microcharcoal showing peaks in frequency which are matched by the Melampyrum curve in the earlier part of the zone. Pteridium and Rosaceae also rise, but there are almost no ruderal weed indicators of newly bare ground, so that the disturbance will have been a little way from the sampling site. Ulmus and Alnus percentages are unaffected, but Quercus falls significantly, replaced by Betula and Pinus, showing a diversification of the local oakwood and increased pollen transport through the canopy.
  • NG7-3
There is no evidence of local fire disturbance at the site in this zone, as the microcharcoal and Melampyrum curves fall to very low levels, although are still present. Pteridium still has a low curve but there are no weed taxa present. Quercus shows a small peak as it recovers some of its pre-disturbance frequencies, perhaps shading out some of the Poaceae pollen, which falls.
  • NG7-4
A more significant fire disturbance event occurs in this zone, with high peaks of microcharcoal and Melampyrum, and the presence of isolated ruderal and grassland weeds including Potentilla-type, Rumex, Ranunculus-type and Plantago lanceolata. Pteridium also shows elevated percentages. Poaceae frequencies are low. Quercus is again the tree mostly reduced, while Alnus values also decline late in the zone as Corylus, Pinus and Salix rise to peak values and Crataegus-type occurs.
  • NG7-5
Disturbance continues in this zone, although microcharcoal and Melampyrum percentages are reduced, and several weed taxa are recorded, notably Potentilla-type but also low values of ruderals such as Epilobium and Artemisia. Pteridium frequencies are high. Quercus percentages remain low, while Corylus and Rosaceae show peak frequencies, Sorbus occurs and Calluna also rises. Other tree taxa are unchanged.
  • NG7-6
Fire disturbance occurs near to the site as microcharcoal and Melampyrum frequencies rise to peaks, with the latter occurring slightly later. Quercus remains at low frequencies, and the percentages of other trees are also unchanged. Corylus remains in very high percentages relative to tree pollen, and Salix is also increased. Pteridium is still high, Poaceae frequencies rise and records of ruderal weed taxa, such as Artemisia and Rumex, occur.
  • NG7-7
In this zone there is little evidence of fire, although the microcharcoal and Melampyrum curves do not fade away completely. Percentages of Pteridium spores are much reduced. Pollen of open ground herbs is almost absent, and Quercus percentages rise markedly, as do those of Alnus. Frequencies of the shrubs Corylus, Salix and Calluna fall, and those of secondary tree regeneration, such as Betula, also fall.
  • NG7-8
In this zone both microcharcoal and Melampyrum frequencies increase, although rather less than in previous zones of disturbance. Quercus percentages are considerably reduced but other trees seem little affected, as is Corylus which does not respond to the renewed burning. Poaceae values rise strongly late in the zone but as this corresponds to a similar increase in Cyperaceae and a fall in Calluna, it is likely that changes in bog surface wetness account for these pollen shifts. Most of the herb pollen recorded in this zone could as easily be referable to wetland taxa as to open ground disturbance indicators.
  • NG7-9
The uppermost zone sees Quercus restored to higher values and with Ulmus and Alnus forming the main tree and shrub pollen contributors, Corylus being in low percentages. Microcharcoal is always present, but in very low frequencies indeed, and Melampyrum fades from the assemblage in mid-zone. Herb pollen, other than Poaceae, and Pteridium are almost absent. There is no evidence of disturbance in this zone. Only Calluna increases its percentages markedly and, as no other taxa vary significantly, could be associated with a drying of the bog surface after the cessation of disturbance.

4.3.2. Diagram Interpretation

The radiocarbon dates and the consistently high frequencies of Ulmus pollen show that the diagram is all of pre-Ulmus Decline, Mesolithic, age. The pre-disturbance woodland comprised Quercus, Alnus and Ulmus mainly, with lesser Tilia and Betula. Notable, however, is the very high proportion of Corylus pollen relative to the tree taxa, and hazel must have been an abundant component of an open woodland at this high altitude, perhaps naturally but also perhaps as a legacy of earlier disturbances. The diagram contains four phases of fire disturbance, in zones NG7-2, NG7-4, NG7-6 and NG7-8, of which NG7-4 and NG7-6 are two separate fires within a longer period of disturbance, in which NG7-5 saw some regeneration of tree cover as disturbance pressure was reduced somewhat, although was still present nearby, if not at this site. The first and fourth episodes of fire disturbance were of lower intensity or further away, having distinctly lower impacts on the woodland at the site. None of the fire phases seems to have created a lot of bare ground as ruderal frequencies and types are low throughout. Quercus was the tree most adversely affected in every case, and might be because oak, as Quercus petraea, tends to grow in single taxon stands in the northern English uplands. Calluna occurs in high values throughout the diagram and could form part of the long-term dryland regeneration community in the open woodland, like hazel, but its abundance might have been linked to hydrological changes on the wetland surface, as was most likely Poaceae, and so is difficult to interpret. The NG7 evidence, therefore, records multiple phases of fire at the same site within an open oak woodland which contained abundant hazel.

4.4. Bonfield Gill Head

The Bonfield Gill Head pollen profile (UK grid reference SE598558; lat. 54°21′15.3″ N long. 1°04′53.1″ W) also lies within stream valley peat that has formed around a spring-head at 346 m above sea level near the summit plateau of the North York Moors in North Yorkshire, North East England (Figure 1), on East Bilsdale Moor to the west of the North Gill site [145]. Bracketing radiocarbon dates (Table 1) of 6122 ± 46 BP [5077 ± 133 cal. BC; Wk-15154] at 83 cm and 5874 ± 44 BP [4730 ± 115 cal. BC; Wk-15152] at 75 cm show that most of the profile lies well within the Late Mesolithic period. Coarser interval palynology recorded fire disturbance phases of Mesolithic age, and subsequent pollen analyses of one of the phases at finer resolution intervals of 2 mm, shown in Figure 5, has clarified its disturbance history.

4.4.1. Pollen Zones

The following nine pollen zones are recognised. The approximate ages of the boundaries of the phases of disturbance could be interpolated from the calibrated means of the bracketing dates, although can only be approximate given the ranges of uncertainty on the calibrations.
  • BGH-1
This zone contains no evidence of active disturbance, with microcharcoal frequencies low and no pollen records of herbs of disturbed and open ground. Herb pollen is contributed mainly by Poaceae, with some wetland types. The tree pollen assemblage is dominated by Quercus and Pinus, with substantial Ulmus values. Betula and Alnus are also present in high frequencies, while Corylus percentages are moderately high.
  • BGH-2
The second zone records a rise in microcharcoal frequencies to a peak of about 100% relative to the tree pollen sum. Herbaceous indicators of disturbance occur, although not in very high percentages, but include isolated records of Brassicaceae and Rumex, and peaks of Melampyrum and Potentilla-type. There is very little evidence of change in the arboreal pollen curves, although secondary trees and shrubs Betula, Corylus and Salix do increase slightly, and Fraxinus becomes present. This zone records fire disturbance, but either at low scale or at a distance from the sampling site.
  • BGH-3
There is no evidence of disturbance in this zone, with microcharcoal frequencies falling and no records of any weeds of open ground. Melampyrum and Pteridium are absent. Little change occurs in the arboreal and shrub taxa, other than Alnus increases slightly and Corylus is reduced.
  • BGH-4
Evidence of fire disturbance returns to the assemblage in this zone, with microcharcoal rising to peak frequencies and a wide range of ruderal and open ground weeds recognised, including Artemisia, Chenopodiaceae, Ranunculus-type and Rumex. Peaks of Melampyrum, Potentilla-type and Pteridium occur. Quercus falls slightly and increases occur in Corylus, Salix and Fraxinus, with Calluna significant for the first time. Despite the evidence of disturbance, the tree pollen curves are not greatly affected and the disturbance, while creating open ground, seems not to have caused a significant recession of tree cover.
  • BGH-5
Quercus and Alnus pollen percentages increase while Corylus, Salix and the secondary tree Betula decline in value. Fraxinus and Calluna are hardly represented. Herbaceous pollen frequencies are very low, with almost no records of disturbance indicators, with Melampyrum and Pteridium almost absent. Microcharcoal frequencies have declined sharply although are consistent in their lower values.
  • BGH-6
Microcharcoal frequencies rise sharply to high peaks, mirrored by peak values of Melampyrum at over 20% of tree pollen and, later in the zone, Pteridium. A wide range of ruderal and grassland herbs is recorded, including for the first time Plantago lanceolata, which is consistently high later in the zone. Corylus rises throughout the zone, achieving peak frequencies at its end, as do Betula, Salix and Calluna. Quercus declines slowly through the zone, while Tilia and Fraxinus increase. Although no major tree recession occurs, this is a substantial phase of fire disturbance, which must have occurred quite close to the site.
  • BGH-7
The tree pollen assemblage does not change greatly, although Quercus does recover somewhat and Tilia and Fraxinus remain important. Microcharcoal frequencies are reduced, but still quite high, and there are fewer ruderal herb types recorded, although Plantago lanceolata remains present throughout. Melampyrum is scarcely recorded, suggesting no new burning at the site. Pteridium and Calluna maintain their increased percentages, and Corylus remains high. This zone seems to reflect a degree of local regeneration and maintained openness, while disturbance might have continued at a greater distance from the site.
  • BGH-8
Renewed fire disturbance occurs in this zone, with microcharcoal frequencies rising sharply to high peaks, while Melampyrum, Pteridium, Potentilla-type and Ranunculus-type are all present in peak percentages and Plantago lanceolata is consistently present. Calluna and Corylus frequencies are also very high, while Fraxinus and Salix show peaks. Quercus values decline slightly but all other tree and shrub percentages are maintained. Although evidence for fire disturbance is clear, it seems to have had only a small impact on the forest.
  • BGH-9
The uppermost zone records the end of fire disturbance as Quercus and Alnus percentages rise significantly and Corylus frequencies are greatly reduced. Pinus frequencies also fall. Microcharcoal percentages become very low and disturbance indicators Melampyrum, Pteridium, Potentilla-type, Calluna and Fraxinus fade from the assemblage. There are very few herb counts, almost all contributed by wetland types, and tree pollen dominates as the recovery of the forest is completed.

4.4.2. Diagram Interpretation

The consistently high Ulmus pollen curve confirms the two radiocarbon dates that bracket the high-resolution diagram in showing Figure 5 to be entirely of Late Mesolithic age. The pre-disturbance woodland was quite mixed and although Quercus and Ulmus were important, there were major components of Betula, Alnus and Corylus, as well as a surprisingly high proportion of Pinus. This might be due to local geology and soils, with sandstone ridges in the vicinity of Bilsdale Moor. The woodland was closed, there being little pollen other than that of trees and tall shrubs. The diagram contains four phases of fire disturbance, in zones BGH-2, BGH-4, BGH-6 and BGH-8. The earlier two zones saw the introduction of open areas, or at least significant breaks in the canopy, as ruderal herbs and pyrophyte taxa are prominent. The increases in Corylus are not great but do indicate more heliophyte conditions, with Quercus most affected. The intervening zones are periods of regeneration of the woodland canopy. The major changes to the woodland occur in zones BGH-6 and BGH-8, with much greater creation of ruderal and open ground habitats and the major increase in Corylus, and also Betula, which is maintained in the reduced disturbance of zone BGH-7, suggesting a more long-lasting diversification of the woodland. These three later zones indicate a more effective disturbance, either of greater intensity or closer to the site, which made real changes to the local woodland. At the end of this sequence of disturbances, in zone BGH-9, a woodland composed of Quercus, Alnus, Betula and Ulmus became established, with Corylus and Pinus much less important members. The BGH evidence records four phases of fire disturbance of a resilient, closed, mixed woodland, with increasingly severe impacts until the final disturbances brought significant and lasting woodland community change.

5. Discussion

Observations of contemporary temperate deciduous woodland [120] allow an understanding of both longer-term autogenic processes of change within the tree community [146,147,148] and the several, relatively dynamic stages of vegetation change caused by disturbance, opening and then regeneration of the woodland matrix [8,149]. Depending on the size and nature of the gap created [150], disturbances within mature woodland are the main process for the creation and maintenance of diversity within that ecosystem [147,151], both in plant species and community structure [152,153], and the neoecology of woodland disturbance and the regeneration niche has been the subject of considerable study [154,155,156]. Fire clearly has a major environmental impact in forested ecosystems [157,158,159,160] and the fire disturbances present in the four profiles shown in this paper, and in many less detailed published examples, allow an understanding of prehistoric woodland disturbance ecology [161,162], spatial patterning of vegetation [163] and the encouragement of islands of plant diversity in woodland ecosystems [164,165] which would otherwise have been generally closed-canopy [52] and homogeneous.

5.1. Distribution of the Evidence for Mesolithic Disturbance

This is not the place for a comprehensive review of the palynological evidence for Mesolithic age forest disturbance in northern England and beyond. It is, however, important to consider how widespread the occurrences of disturbance were in pre-Neolithic times, particularly in the mid-Holocene, Late Mesolithic forests that are the main focus of this paper, and therefore to establish how representative the four examples in this paper are of the overall Mesolithic disturbance evidence. The distribution of the evidence will inevitably reflect the distribution of the research effort, yielding more examples in areas more closely studied, particularly in places where the analysis of such evidence has been the research aim, such as in the uplands of the North York Moors, and parts of the Pennine Hills in northern England [15,44,164,166]. The authors, however, have accumulated a database that extends into the hundreds of sites of Mesolithic age disturbance, and, given that earlier palynological studies often did not record microcharcoal data, it is clear that burning in the Mesolithic forest was very commonplace indeed, causing significant changes in forest dynamics, although its linkage with a hunter-gatherer origin is inevitably circumstantial. Evidence of such disturbance, usually involving fire, occurs almost everywhere in Britain and Ireland where research has been undertaken, for example in South West England [74], Scotland [32,167,168], Wales [82], the Isle of Man [169] and Ireland [30]. Fire disturbance of vegetation in Mesolithic times was clearly very widespread. Of particular interest are those cases where fire disturbance coincided with major changes in forest structure and dynamics. The initial rise of Corylus pollen percentages in the earlier Holocene might have been promoted by fire in the hands of hunter-gatherers [170]. There are also over forty instances where the mid-Holocene Alnus rise, a major pollen-stratigraphic event and pollen zone boundary, was probably assisted by fire as it coincided with macro- or microcharcoal peaks, e.g., [82,171,172].
While Britain has most of the published evidence for Late Mesolithic fire disturbance of woodland ecosystems, there is a considerable body of evidence from mainland Europe suggesting that the same type of fire-management of forests might well have been practiced across that much larger area, in both the Early and Late Mesolithic, and in both lowland and upland locations. Pollen evidence of woodland canopy opening in western Europe has long been reported [173] but more recently higher resolution palynology has revealed many examples of forest burning, some of which have been attributed to deliberate burning and management [174] and have stimulated discussion of fire and forager-landscape relationships similar to that in Britain [175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182], often with a similar focus on the encouragement of Corylus and its value as a food resource [179,183,184,185,186,187,188], and even the transformation of the forest to hazel ‘plantations’ [188]. While some examples of fire disturbance have been reported from southern Europe [189,190,191] and from Scandinavia [192,193,194] it is in central and northern Europe that most examples occur, in particular in woodland and marshes around wetlands in the North European Plain of The Netherlands, Germany, Poland and the Baltic States [180,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203] situations that were unlikely to have supported natural wildfires during the early to mid-Holocene. These northern European sites resemble the record at the lowland sites of northern England discussed in this paper, usually being single or long interval burn events, although some repeated burning did occur [186]. The widespread occurrence of fire disturbance in the Mesolithic of Britain and many parts of Europe indicates that the ecological successions that followed burning must be taken into account when reconstructing early and mid-Holocene forest structure and dynamics, at least at regional, and perhaps at wider, scales.

5.2. The Original Forest and Natural Succession in the Study Area

Pollen evidence from the four sites examined above suggests that they all supported mixed deciduous forest, with a high-forest full canopy in the lowland examples, in the years before the occurrence of disturbance. Tilia and Ulmus were common where edaphic conditions permitted [120], and Quercus and Alnus were most important in other areas, as well as more generally in the uplands. As in the case of the two upland examples, the upland oakwoods of northern England would have naturally contained a lot of Corylus [204]. In places, particularly at higher altitudes, they might well have been less dense and included trees of secondary type like Betula and Fraxinus, perhaps a legacy of earlier disturbance combined with higher altitude and more acid soils. Tree stumps and trunks at high altitudes [60,62,205] indicate that all but the highest uplands would have been able to support mature broadleaf woodland before any disturbance and after it ceased, with woodland composition determined primarily by geology and topography. Pollen-based reconstructions of the upland northern English woodlands would generally support this, e.g., [44,74,205,206,207,208,209], with relatively high arboreal pollen levels during undisturbed periods. The presence of several tree stumps of various taxa, including Quercus and Betula, at the highest altitudes at Bonfield Gill Head and elsewhere on the North York Moors immediately before the Ulmus Decline and the start of the Neolithic indicates the potential for full woodland cover, forest not just scrub. That the recolonisation of the upland summit plateaux by mature deciduous woodland coincided with the end of the Mesolithic and the end of the microcharcoal curve in pollen diagrams [60,210] is compelling evidence that burning and suppression of the upper forest limit was a function of Late Mesolithic land use. Without disturbance, the Mesolithic age woodland seems to have been stable, with consistent arboreal curves in pollen diagrams, particularly once the full suite of broadleaf trees had been assembled after the rise of Alnus in the centuries around 7000 radiocarbon years ago. The inertia of the forest [11,13,211], in Boreal times, but particularly in the mid-Holocene Atlantic climatic phase, meant that natural within-forest successions [212] were slow and limited to replacement of individual trees by same-taxon individuals or as a community to the slow pace of soil development and gradual climate change [101].

5.3. Post-Disturbance Recolonisation

There is a variety of secondary successional pathways following fire disturbance of woodland [213,214], depending greatly on the type and intensity of the burn, canopy or ground, and which plants survive the burning on site as ‘legacy’ species [215]. In the case of Mesolithic-age fire disturbances, unless the fire was intense it is unlikely that all trees in the burned area would have been killed, but some would have remained standing as ‘standard’ trees amongst the regeneration community, and so would have continued to contribute to the local pollen rain. Canopy fires would have allowed penetration of light to the ground flora field layer understorey [216] but would not have devegetated the site entirely and caused bare ground. The pollen data from the four diagrams, however, indicates ground rather than canopy fire as the pollen of pioneer recolonising taxa is common. In general, the earliest successional, pioneer communities are dominated by annual herbaceous weed species for the first few years after disturbance, although these are then displaced by perennial herbaceous species, and then shrubs in later regeneration stages [153], as each successional community is replaced in turn. This process of taxa replacement [217] continues until seral regeneration is complete and a self-replacing woodland community is re-established. Several regeneration stages are apparent in the four pollen diagrams.

5.3.1. Ruderals

Several of the disturbance phases in the four pollen diagrams contain ruderal weed pollen that indicate broken ground and almost devegetated conditions [39,40], suggesting that the disturbances were of significant scale and intensity to create a clearing in the forest and initiate regeneration from its earliest stage, with bare ground conditions attractive to pioneer colonisers. A major, although localised, ground fire is suggested. Zones SW-2 and ESE3-2 in the lowlands, and zones NG7-4 and 5, and BGH-6 to 8 in the upland examples, contain a wide ruderal assemblage with weeds in quite substantial frequencies. Artemisia is commonly present in these assemblages and reflects disturbed soils, but several other ruderals occur also. The presence of grassland herbs, most commonly the perennials Potentilla-type and Plantago lanceolata, in these disturbance pollen assemblages suggests the effects of trampling and grazing by ungulates [218], presumably the game that the burning was designed to attract. That ruderal pollen is present throughout the disturbance phases will reflect the continued soil disturbance that the game animals would cause as succession progressed [69]. That some of the disturbance phases in the upland diagrams do not have pollen of this ruderal stage might mean that these were lighter, perhaps crown fires which allowed enhanced light penetration to the ground, but is more likely to mean that they were similar ground fires but at a distance from the pollen site, but within its pollen source area, most ruderal pollen being unable to be transported to the pollen site and therefore unrecorded.

5.3.2. Pyrophytes

Melampyrum (particularly pratense and sylvaticum) is an early successional field layer taxon characteristic of disturbed woodland glades and edges [216,219,220], particularly in upland woodland on acidic soils [221], which immediately invades burned areas after fire [222,223]. This explains the near synchroneity of the microcharcoal and Melampyrum curves on all of the site examples in this paper, and their co-occurrence in many other fire disturbance episodes in pollen diagrams of Late Mesolithic age in northern England, e.g., [122,224,225,226] and elsewhere, e.g., [82,144,227,228] often in high peaks of over 20% of tree pollen. It also shows increased values, however, in some disturbances of Neolithic age and later [145,229,230]. The palaeoecological data thus confirms the neoecological status of Melampyrum as a pyrophyte indicator of the field layer of burned woodland [223,231]. That it is resistant to trampling [232] and is thus favoured by grazing in the recently fire-disturbed areas is another reason why it appears so regularly in post-fire woodland assemblages, the magnitude of its frequencies likely regulated by the proximity of the burned area to the pollen sampling site, as modern pollen rain studies show that high percentages tend to be recorded close to Melampyrum plants [220]. It is almost ubiquitous in fire disturbance phases, whereas some ruderal types fail to be recorded, however, suggesting that its small pollen grains might be capable of wind transport [233], so that if microcharcoal is capable of transportation from some distance away to a sampling site, so can Melampyrum. Pteridium is also regarded as being able to regenerate from its rhizomes rapidly after fire [184,234,235,236], and the Pteridium curve in the four diagrams, often mirroring the Melampyrum and microcharcoal curves, confirms its pyrophyte nature. Shrubs, including Corylus, can sprout from surviving burned bushes [237] and so can also be favoured by fire and figure strongly in forest stand replacement [238], and burning also favours the spread of the dwarf shrub Calluna vulgaris [239], which agrees with the behaviour of the heather curve in the four pollen diagrams.

5.3.3. Tall Forb and Heath Communities

The four pollen diagrams are alike in showing evidence for succession passing through a phase of tall herbs and low heath shrubs as they displaced the shorter pioneer ruderal weeds and grasses through competition for light and space [240]. Taxa diversity in the pollen diagrams falls after the initial recolonisation phase as many pioneer types cannot survive in the tall herb phase, being rapidly removed by strong competition from taxa like Pteridium, thus reducing floristic richness [222,241]. The pollen diagrams suggest that Filipendula and Rumex were important in the tall herb phase but that grazing pressure on the ground flora [242], as animals were attracted to the dynamic early successions in the opened areas, tended to allow less palatable taxa like Pteridium and Calluna, bracken being particularly effective in invading pioneer communities [235,236], to become common and suppress herbaceous vegetation through shade and litter. Pteridium can provide food for humans after appropriate treatment [243] and its importance in Mesolithic subsistence can be overlooked [244]. Peaks of Pteridium and Calluna in the pollen diagrams suggest that this bracken and heather community was an important, and sometimes prolonged, intermediate phase before regeneration of woody vegetation in the disturbed area.

5.3.4. Mantle Vegetation

One purpose of much of the Late Mesolithic anthropogenic disturbance in northern England was to break the homogeneity of the forest by reducing the amount of biomass locked up in mature trees and to increase the proportion of fringing forest-edge and mantle shrub vegetation in the landscape’s woodland cover [245]. This ecotone transitional vegetation which naturally occurred at the edge of mature woodland, and which could be quite wide, was dominated by lower stature, heliophyte shrubs which were particularly productive in terms of nuts and fruits [162,168,243,246,247], as well as important wood products for tools and structures [248]. Its area would have been greatly increased by human disturbance activity which created open areas within the forest, probably producing a patchy woodland cover [102], and therefore more woodland-edge, mantle vegetation in the later stages of regeneration. Corylus was naturally common in early and mid-Holocene English woodlands, usually as understorey but it might well have been abundant and even a canopy component in areas of favourable edaphic and other factors [249]. It would have been a member of any forest margin community, both outside and within the forest. Increases in Corylus pollen in the mid- to later stages of regeneration in all four study profiles, first sprouting from surviving understorey bushes and then from colonisation of the opened area, illustrates the importance of this woodland edge community, which would have spread from the disturbance margins to occupy the whole of the opened area. The pollen data from many sites of Mesolithic-age fires in Britain [27] and elsewhere, e.g., [250] show clearly that Corylus typically spread to occupy the burned site after forest fires. This was probably one of the objectives of the burning, and as well as the dominant hazel, the four pollen diagrams show that other shrubs were part of this later stage regeneration shrub community, including Prunus, Sorbus, Crataegus and other Rosaceous taxa, all of which would have provided food for Mesolithic foragers. The bushes of this regeneration stage are important for the re-establishment of woodland as they provide shelter for the younger saplings of the primary forest trees and which eventually will overtop and shade out the mantle community, despite the considerable inertia of the dense Corylus vegetation, some of which would have survived into the restored woodland as understorey, a role to which the shade tolerant Corylus is well adapted [251,252].

5.3.5. Restored Closed Woodland

After disturbance, forests might have never fully recovered to their pre-disturbance state and some increased diversity in the tree community might be expected [148]. The creation of a clearing might well provide opportunities for taxa to join the forest matrix during regeneration and then to persist as part of the new stabilised order when regeneration was completed [253], even if a closed woodland canopy was restored. Betula and Fraxinus might be expected to be prominent in any ‘secondary’ type woodland, although birch does find it difficult to penetrate dense Corylus shrub thickets as seem to have formed in the later stages of regeneration, and is outcompeted by hazel generally [254]. These two fairly short-lived trees should be considered as ‘gap-phase’ species [98,255] which would persist in the canopy for a few decades until replaced by longer-lived canopy dominants, which is what can be observed in the pollen diagrams. At Sniggery Wood, while the trees present before disturbance resumed their earlier pollen frequencies almost exactly when regeneration finished, Tilia and Fraxinus became consistent members of the restored woodland community, perhaps occupying some areas previously carrying Alnus. Diversity would therefore have been introduced to the woodland composition over a range of timescales [256] by the disturbance, particularly if the incidence of fire was high with a short return interval [190] as in the upland examples in this paper. Elsewhere, while composition remained the same, the proportions of the original trees often changed because of the changes in soils and other environmental factors caused by disturbance, such as the replacement of Betula by Alnus at Bonfield Gill Head, presumably due to edaphic changes and paludification within the burned area. In all four cases in this paper, however, it appears that woodland was able to recover to its pre-disturbance levels, whether that was dense in the lowlands or more open in the uplands. In both areas, however, even though it was the tree that the pollen data says was most affected by fire-disturbance, it is Quercus that dominated the restored forest community, partly because it was the major forest component before disturbance, but also because oak is fire-resilient, has shade-tolerant seedlings, regenerates well in open areas in woodland, can outcompete the more light-demanding secondary trees when the regeneration succession gets to the canopy-closure stage, and trees that survived the burning tend to produce more acorns in the years following fire [257,258,259]. Like Pteridium in the earlier stages of post-fire succession, after treatment acorns could present a useful addition to the plant foods encouraged by the fire disturbance [259].

5.4. The Lowland Disturbances and Succession

The two examples of Mesolithic age fire disturbance shown in this paper are alike in showing a single burning event, followed by a ‘progressive’ succession with a unidirectional, ‘seral’ series of stages of regeneration, moving from pioneer vegetation through increasingly taller communities until the re-establishment of an internally stable, mature woodland [260], very similar to the pre-disturbance forest. Almost all the coarser resolution lowland examples of such disturbance contain a record of continuous regeneration to woodland, e.g., [261,262,263], with no indication of multiple fires at the same site, nor an arrested succession, and it must be assumed to be the norm for lowland examples. The few lowland examples with multiple charcoal horizons, e.g., [84,264] are usually around places like small lakes where long-term occupation might be expected, and with significant intervals between fires, e.g., [265]. It might be that the lowland examples in northern England actually represent natural fires from lightning strike, which are most likely to occur during periods of dry and warm climate [266], a correlation noted elsewhere [160,267], with no human ignition involved, although the dense and damp mid-Holocene lowland forests would not have burned easily [92,268]. Alternatively, they could have been caused by human ignition [269,270] as an isolated event which would have been temporarily economically advantageous for people given the productive successional communities that followed disturbance, but not as part of any land-use strategy that altered the local woodland vegetation structure long term. The greater density and arboreal composition of the lowland forest might not have been conducive to any such prolonged form of landscape management, although hunter-gatherers could have utilised it to their advantage in a low intensity way [271].

5.5. The Upland Disturbances and Succession

The successive post-fire vegetation communities would have contained several species that provided Mesolithic foragers with plant food [243,246,272,273,274] during the earlier seral stages, but it is the role of Corylus that was probably the most important. Mid-Holocene pollen data from most of the English uplands indicate that these Late Mesolithic age upland areas naturally carried a lot of Corylus, hazel often having the highest frequencies among the dryland tree and shrub taxa, e.g., [163,275], only matched by Alnus at wetland margins under specialist edaphic conditions. Corylus avellana was a very important component of the English postglacial woodland after its initial immigration in the centuries around 9000 radiocarbon years ago [42], a process which was asynchronous as it was regulated by local ecology, climate, immigration rate and competition [249,276,277]. It was, however, apparently often triggered by fire breaking the inertia of the woodland, e.g., [99,151,278,279] and providing hazel with an opportunity to colonise disturbed areas, judging by the many examples of macro- or microcharcoal coinciding with the initial and also later rises of Corylus frequencies in northern English pollen diagrams, e.g., [136,166,264,280]. It has been suggested [170,176] that this fire evidence shows that Mesolithic people were instrumental in promoting the early Holocene initial Corylus rise, its rational limit on pollen diagrams. Some pollen diagrams with the Corylus rational limit do not record coincident charcoal [281], however, and it is probable that the natural factors listed above [249] controlled the immigration of Corylus, as with the other tree taxa, with fire having an influence and triggering hazel immigration at individual sites [267,280]. In the later Mesolithic, however, after Corylus was well established in the forest, fire might have been the main force that controlled its abundance. In the later Mesolithic lowlands, as in the examples shown above, fire disturbance was a single event at particular sites which set in train natural successions that went through seral stages until woodland was restored. In contrast, the evidence in the examples of upland fire-disturbance presented above suggests that in the uplands a fire-disturbance regime operated in which fire continued to be applied to individual sites on multiple occasions after the initial burn, promoting the longer-term abundance of hazel by holding succession at the shrub mantle phase and preventing regeneration of the taller woodland trees and their eventual shading out of hazel. Such repeated burning of a site leads to reduced taxa diversity in the ecosystem, and concentrates nutrient resources in a few species, in this case mainly Corylus, and delays the regeneration of ‘climax’ species [222,241,282]. This would amount to the creation of a new ecological niche [29,32,168,179,181] through the concentration of food-producing plants into accessible stands [29,31] by Mesolithic foragers. Corylus avellana can sprout naturally in coppice form and thus persist in the plant community [237,283,284] including after fire, a stage which would be the most productive for hazel nuts which would have been produced in abundance [285,286], as well as useful wood products. Fire-management of the upland woods by Mesolithic people would therefore have maintained a stable, reliable food resource [185,187,246,247,287] at individual sites for long periods of time, perhaps for several decades [288], presumably in favoured, selected locations to which people could return regularly [289]. Although only broad approximations, interpolated ages for the duration of the four disturbances at North Gill suggest that disturbance/regeneration phases lasted about a century and so it seems that the regenerating areas were available for exploitation for about four generations of foragers. Phases at Bonfield Gill Head appear to have been shorter, of only about two generations, although the disturbance signal might have faded from the assemblage more quickly if the burns were further from the sampling site. These short intervals between fires indicate strongly that they were very probably the result of human agency.
The upland woods would have been transformed into a dynamic mosaic of patches recovering from disturbance [102,290] so that an overall equilibrium in the proportion of various successional and restored woodland communities would have been maintained [14,255,291]. Late Mesolithic coppice wood has been found [36,292,293] and early hazel coppicing has been inferred from palynological data [226,294], while the presence of abundant hazelnut shells on many Mesolithic archaeological sites, e.g., [202,295] reflects the importance of this food source to hunter-gatherers. The regenerating patches of successional vegetation would have been attractive to deer [296], the most important quarry for Mesolithic people, and would have concentrated the animals in predictable locations, making them easier to find and exploit. The presence of high dung fungi concentrations during one such mid-Holocene disturbance and regeneration event, particularly in its early stages, indicates that such increased concentrations of game animals did occur within the regenerating area [297]. Such partial control of upland deer populations, added to the enhanced hazel resource [244,298], could well have been a major element of the Late Mesolithic economy [299,300]. It is likely that while some patches in the forest regeneration mosaic were being actively burned to attract game to the dynamic earlier stages of succession, other patches more advanced in regeneration were being cropped for hazel nuts until further burning was required to delay forest re-establishment. In the northern English uplands even when forest cover was restored, it was dominated by Quercus, which itself had the potential to be of value to foragers as oaks regenerated after fire often produce an enhanced acorn crop, itself a source of food for humans [259].

6. Conclusions

It is well documented that many fires occurred during the Late Mesolithic period in the forests of northern England, in both lowland and upland contexts, deduced from charcoal in peat sediments and confirmed by evidence of woodland recession as recorded in pollen diagrams. Microscopic charcoal particles in the microfossil assemblages provide a more spatial record of the presence and magnitude of fire in the forest environment. At coarse resolution sampling these fire disturbances seem to be evidence of single forest fires. Fine resolution palynology, however, provides a much more detailed understanding of these fire disturbances, allowing a reconstruction of their scale and internal structure. It ensures that all stages in the regeneration process are preserved in the pollen data, with no gaps in the record, and has shown that in some cases these disturbances were not single burning events but composite, involving a succession of fires around the same site.
The two lowland examples presented in this paper are very similar. A single burning event, which might have been natural or anthropogenic, caused substantial tree recession or at least major canopy opening, allowing ruderal and pyrophytic herbs to colonise the open areas created between the trees. The range of weeds recorded suggests that these open areas were substantial. Plant succession ensued, with the removal of open ground weeds from the pollen record, replaced by the pollen of shrubs, from the increased flowering of understorey woodland edge shrubs, from individuals that persisted in the burned area and from those that recolonised the affected area, mainly Corylus, which was eventually joined by secondary trees. Regeneration culminated in the re-establishment of the original deciduous forest as the clearing closed completely. There was only one burning event, followed by seral succession and successful forest regeneration.
The two upland examples were very different from the lowland examples. Seral succession after the initial burn continued into the Corylus shrub phase of regeneration as in the lowland examples. When this phase was mature and canopy closure was beginning as trees began to recolonise the opened area, however, a further burning event occurred which reopened the clearing and made succession revert to an earlier stage. At the upland sites three or four such fires occurred at short intervals during a protracted phase of disturbance until restoration of woodland was allowed to occur. Estimation of the active disturbance duration suggests one to five generations. Moreover, that microcharcoal continued to be present in low values between the fire events suggests that some burning was continuing in the vicinity but not at these sample sites.
The multi-burn nature of the upland examples, with frequent recurring fires around the same site, is unlikely to record natural fire. It is much more likely to represent a controlled human agency for the burning, and it would have maintained the upland woods in a patchy state of late succession, maximising the populations of early-succession plant foods, then fruit-bearing shrubs, primarily Corylus and its nut yield. This form of continued ‘coppicing’ of the upland woods would have had other economic benefits in the attraction and control of ungulate game and would have been a central element of Late Mesolithic economy and land-use. The greater frequency of burning episodes in the uplands, if of human agency, must reflect a preference of Mesolithic people for hunting and foraging in these areas. The uplands would have naturally carried lighter woodland with a greater Corylus component on lighter soils, compared to the denser, wetter lowland forest. The uplands would also have been home to greater numbers of game animals, especially deer and particularly in the summer when the cooler, drier uplands with better browsing enabled animals to escape the flies infesting the heavily forested damp lowland. Presumably summer was the Mesolithic hunting season when setting fires would be easier and hunting bands would have the best chance of success. Whether the lowland fires were also ignited by foragers is possible but perhaps less likely, with single burns or long intervals between fires, and natural ignition can be considered as a cause. The location of many lowland burning events in Britain and Europe in wetlands around lakes, however, might make natural ignition less likely, and hunter-gatherer activity a more probable cause. More fine resolution studies of fire disturbances in both lowland and upland contexts are needed to address this question.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/f14040719/s1. Table S1. Full stratigraphic descriptions and interpretations of the four sediment profiles discussed in this paper: Sniggery Wood, Little Hawes Water ESE3, North Gill 7 and Bonfield Gill.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Investigation and Methodology, J.B.I. and J.J.B. Writing J.B.I. and J.J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are presented in the paper.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Chris Orton of the Cartography Unit, Geography Department, Durham University for producing the figures.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Andersen, S.T. The different pollen productivity of trees and its significance for the interpretation of a pollen diagram from a forested region. In Quaternary Plant Ecology; Birks, H.J.B., West, R.G., Eds.; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK, 1973; pp. 109–115. [Google Scholar]
  2. Birks, H.J.B. Late-Quaternary biotic changes in terrestrial and lacustrine environments, with particular reference to north-west Europe. In Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology; Berglund, B.E., Ed.; John Wiley: Chichester, UK, 1986; pp. 3–65. [Google Scholar]
  3. Birks, H.J.B.; Birks, H.H. The rise and fall of forests. Science 2004, 305, 484–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Godwin, H. History of the British Flora; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  5. Birks, H.J.B.; Tinner, W. Past forests of Europe. In European Atlas of Forest Tree Species; San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Durrant, T.H., Mauri, A., Eds.; Publication Office EU: Luxembourg, 2016; pp. 36–39. [Google Scholar]
  6. Feurdean, A.; Bhagwat, S.A.; Willis, K.J.; Birks, H.J.B.; Lischke, H.; Hickler, T. Tree migration-rates: Narrowing the gap between inferred post-glacial rates and projected rates. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bradshaw, R.H.W. Forest response to Holocene climatic change: Equilibrium or non-equilibrium. In Climate Change and Human Impact on the Landscape; Chambers, F.M., Ed.; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1993; pp. 57–65. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fekete, G. The holistic view of succession reconsidered. Coenoses 1992, 7, 21–30. [Google Scholar]
  9. Silvertown, J. History of a latitudinal diversity gradient: Woody plants in Europe 13,000–1000 years BP. J. Biogeogr. 1985, 12, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huntley, B. Glacial and Holocene vegetation history: Europe. In Vegetation History; Huntley, B., Webb, T., III, Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988; pp. 341–383. [Google Scholar]
  11. Smith, A.G. Problems of inertia and threshold related to post-glacial habitat changes. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 1965, 161, 331–342. [Google Scholar]
  12. Davis, M.B. Quaternary history and the stability of forest communities. In Forest Succession: Concepts and Applications; West, D.C., Shuggart, H.H., Botkin, D.B., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1981; pp. 132–153. [Google Scholar]
  13. Von Holle, B.; Delcourt, H.R.; Simberloff, D. The importance of biological inertia in plant community resistance to invasion. J. Veg. Sci. 2003, 14, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Bormann, F.H.; Likens, G.E. Catastrophic disturbance and the steady state in Northern Hardwood forests: A new look at the role of disturbance in the development of forest ecosystems suggests important implications for land-use policies. Am. Sci. 1979, 67, 660–669. [Google Scholar]
  15. Simmons, I.G.; Innes, J.B. Late Mesolithic land-use and its impacts in the English uplands. Biogeogr. Monogr. 1985, 2, 7–17. [Google Scholar]
  16. Froyd, C.A. Holocene fire in the Scottish Highlands: Evidence from macroscopic charcoal records. Holocene 2006, 16, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brown, A.G. Clearances and clearings: Deforestation in Mesolithic/Neolithic Britain. Oxf. J. Archaeol. 1997, 16, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Frelich, L.E. Forest Dynamics and Disturbance Regimes: Studies from Temperate Evergreen-Deciduous Forests; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  19. Patterson, W.A.; Backman, A.E. Fire and disease history of forests. In Vegetation History; Huntley, B., Webb, T., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 603–632. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tipping, R.M. Storminess as an explanation for the decline of pine woodland ca. 7400 years ago at Loch Tulla, western Scotland. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 2008, 17, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Waller, M. Drought, disease, defoliation and death: Forest pathogens as agents of past vegetation change. J. Quat. Sci. 2013, 28, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kirby, K.J. A model of a natural wooded landscape in Britain as influenced by large herbivore activity. Forestry 2004, 77, 405–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Sandom, C.J.; Ejrnæs, R.; Hansen, M.D.D.; Svenning, J.-C. High herbivore density associated with vegetation diversity in interglacial ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 4162–4167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Grant, M.; Waller, M. Holocene fire histories from the edge of Romney Marsh. In Romney Marsh: Persistence and Change in a Coastal Lowland; Waller, M., Edwards, E., Barber, L., Eds.; Romney Marsh Research Trust: Sevenoaks, UK, 2010; pp. 53–73. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hughes, P.D.M.; Mauquoy, D.; Barber, K.E.; Langdon, P.G. Mire-development pathways and palaeoclimatic records from a full Holocene peat archive at Walton Moss, Cumbria, England. Holocene 2000, 10, 465–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Thomas, P.A.; McAlpine, R. Fire in the Forest; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  27. Simmons, I.G. The Environmental Impact of Later Mesolithic Cultures; Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  28. Driscoll, K. Constructing later Mesolithic landscapes. In From Bann Flakes to Bushmills. Papers in Honour of Professor Peter Woodman; Finlay, N., McCartan, S., Milner, N., Wickham-Jones, C.J., Eds.; Oxbow: Oxford, UK, 2009; pp. 101–112. [Google Scholar]
  29. Smith, B.D. General patterns of niche construction and the management of ‘wild’ plant and animal resources by small-scale pre-industrial societies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2011, 366, 836–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Warren, G.; Davis, S.; McClatchie, M.; Sands, R. The potential role of humans in structuring the wooded landscapes of Mesolithic Ireland: A review of data and discussion of approaches. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 2014, 23, 629–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rowley-Conwy, P.; Layton, R. Foraging and farming as niche construction: Stable and unstable adaptations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 366, 849–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bishop, R.R.; Church, M.J.; Rowley-Conwy, P.A. Firewood, food and human niche construction: The potential role of Mesolithic hunter-gatherers in actively structuring Scotland’s woodlands. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2015, 108, 51–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Edwards, K.J. Models of forest farming for north-west Europe. In Climate Change and Human Impact on the Landscape; Chambers, F.M., Ed.; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1993; pp. 134–155. [Google Scholar]
  34. Buckley, P.; Mills, J. Coppice silviculture: From the Mesolithic to the 21st century. In Europe’s Changing Woods and Forests: From Wildwood to Managed Landscapes; Kirby, K.J., Watkins, C., Eds.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2015; pp. 77–92. [Google Scholar]
  35. Waller, M.; Grant, M.J.; Bunting, M.J. Modern pollen studies from coppiced woodlands and their implications for the detection of woodland management in Holocene pollen records. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2012, 187, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Milner, N.; Conneller, C.; Taylor, B. (Eds.) Star Carr Volume 2: Studies in Technology, Subsistence and Environment; White Rose University Press: York, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  37. Turner, J.; Peglar, S.M. Temporally-precise studies of vegetation history. In Vegetation History; Huntley, B., Webb, T., III, Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988; pp. 753–777. [Google Scholar]
  38. Green, D.G. Time series and postglacial forest ecology. Quat. Res. 1981, 15, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Behre, K.-E. The interpretation of anthropogenic indicators in pollen diagrams. Pollen Spores 1981, 23, 225–245. [Google Scholar]
  40. Behre, K.E. (Ed.) Anthropogenic Indicators in Pollen Diagrams; Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  41. Rackham, O. Wildwood. In Archaeology and the Flora of the British Isles; Jones, M., Ed.; Oxford University Committee for Archaeology 14: Oxford, UK, 1988; pp. 3–6. [Google Scholar]
  42. Birks, H.J.B. Holocene isochrone maps and patterns of tree-spreading in the British Isles. J. Biogeogr. 1989, 16, 503–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Birks, H.J.B. Long-term ecological change in the British uplands. In Ecological Change in the Uplands; Usher, M.B., Thompson, D.B.A., Eds.; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK, 1988; pp. 37–56. [Google Scholar]
  44. Tallis, J.H.; Switsur, V.R. Forest and moorland in the South Pennine uplands in the mid-Flandrian period: II. The hillslope forests. J. Ecol. 1990, 78, 857–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Simmons, I.G. Towards an ecology of Mesolithic man in the uplands of Great Britain. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1975, 2, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Peterken, G.F. Woodland Conservation and Management; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  47. Peterken, G.F. Natural Woodland: Ecology and Conservation in Northern Temperate Regions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  48. Peterken, G.F. Woodland history in the British Isles—An interaction of environmental and cultural forces. In Europe’s Changing Woods and Forests: From Wildwood to Managed Landscapes; Kirby, K.J., Watkins, C., Eds.; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2015; pp. 265–278. [Google Scholar]
  49. Spikins, P. GIS models of past vegetation: An example from northern England, 10,000–5000 BP. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2000, 27, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fyfe, R.M. The importance of local-scale openness within regions dominated by closed woodland. J. Quat. Sci. 2007, 22, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vera, F.W.M. Grazing Ecology and Forest History; CABI Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  52. Svenning, J.-C. A review of natural vegetation openness in north-western Europe. Biol. Conserv. 2002, 104, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Birks, H.J.B. Mind the gap: How open were European primeval forests? TREE 2005, 20, 154–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mitchell, F.J.G. How open were European primeval forests? J. Ecol. 2005, 93, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bradshaw, R.H.W.; Hannon, G. The Holocene structure of north-west European forest induced from palaeoecological data. In Forest Biodiversity: Lessons from History for Conservation; Honnay, O., Verheyen, K., Bossuyt, B., Hermy, M., Eds.; CABI: Oxfordshire, UK, 2004; pp. 11–25. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bunting, M.J.; Farrell, M. Seeing the wood for the trees: Recent advances in the reconstruction of woodland in archaeological landscapes using pollen data. Environ. Archaeol. 2018, 23, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sugita, S.; Gaillard, M.J.; Broström, A. Landscape openness and pollen records: A simulation approach. Holocene 1999, 9, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Caseldine, C.; Fyfe, R. A modelling approach to locating and characterising elm decline/landnam landscapes. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2006, 25, 632–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fyfe, R.M.; Twiddle, C.; Sugita, S.; Gaillard, M.-J.; Barratt, P.; Caseldine, C.J.; Dodson, J.; Edwards, K.J.; Farrell, M.; Froyd, C.; et al. The Holocene vegetation cover of Britain and Ireland: Overcoming problems of scale and discerning patterns of openness. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2013, 73, 132–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Simmons, I.G.; Innes, J.B. Late Quaternary vegetational history of the North York Moors. X. Investigations on East Bilsdale Moor. J. Biogeogr. 1988, 15, 299–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lageard, J.G.A.; Chambers, F.M.; Thomas, P.A. Climatic significance of the marginalisation of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) c. 2500 BC at White Moss, south Cheshire, UK. Holocene 1999, 9, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Innes, J.B. Tree remains from a buried mid-Holocene palaeoforest in upland north-east Yorkshire. Quat. Newsl. 2008, 115, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
  63. Waller, M. Megafossils: Evidence for the nature of Holocene lowland woodland in England and Wales. Quat. Newsl. 2022, 155, 17–31. [Google Scholar]
  64. Smith, D.N.; Whitehouse, N.J. Not seeing the Trees for the Woods; a palaeoentomological perspective on Holocene woodland composition. In The “Fertile Ground”. Papers in Honour of Susan Limbrey; Smith, D.N., Brickley, M.B., Smith, W., Eds.; Oxbow Books: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 136–161. [Google Scholar]
  65. Whitehouse, N.J. The Holocene British and Irish ancient woodland fossil beetle fauna: Implications for woodland history, biodiversity and faunal colonisation. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2006, 25, 1755–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bradshaw, R.H.; Hannon, G.E.; Lister, A.M. A long-term perspective on ungulate–vegetation interactions. For. Ecol. Manag. 2003, 181, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hodder, K.H.; Bullock, J.M.; Buckland, P.C.; Kirby, K.J. Large Herbivores in the Wildwood and Modern Naturalistic Grazing Systems; English Nature Research Reports 648; Natural England: Worcester, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  68. Latałowa, M.; Zimny, M.; Jędrzejewska, B.; Samojlik, T. Białowieża Primeval Forest: A 2000-year interplay of environmental and cultural forces in Europe’s best preserved temperate woodland. In Europe’s Changing Woods and Forests: From Wildwood to Managed Landscapes; Kirby, K.J., Watkins, C., Eds.; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2015; pp. 243–264. [Google Scholar]
  69. Buckland, P.C.; Edwards, K.J. The longevity of pastoral episodes of clearance activity in pollen diagrams: The role of post-occupation grazing. J. Biogeogr. 1984, 11, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bradshaw, R.H.W.; Mitchell, F.J.G. The palaeoecological approach to reconstructing former grazing–vegetation interactions. For. Ecol. Manag. 1999, 120, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dale, V.H.; Joyce, L.A.; McNulty, S.; Neilson, R.P.; Ayres, M.P.; Flannigan, M.D.; Hanson, P.L.; Irland, L.C.; Lugo, A.E.; Peterson, C.J.; et al. Climate change and forest disturbances. BioScience 2001, 51, 723–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Jacobi, R.M.; Tallis, J.H.; Mellars, P.A. The southern Pennine Mesolithic and the ecological record. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1976, 3, 307–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Williams, C.T. Mesolithic Exploitation Patterns in the Central Pennines. A Palynological Study of Soyland Moor; British Archaeological Reports British Series 139; Archaeopress: Oxford, UK, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  74. Caseldine, C.; Hatton, J. The development of high moorland on Dartmoor: Fire and the influence of Mesolithic activity on vegetation change. In Climate Change and Human Impact on the Landscape; Chambers, F.M., Ed.; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1993; pp. 119–131. [Google Scholar]
  75. Scherjon, F.; Bakels, C.; MacDonald, K.; Roebroeks, W. Burning the land: An ethnographic study of off-site fire use by current and historically documented foragers and implications for the interpretation of past fire practices in the landscape. Curr. Anthropol. 2015, 56, 299–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Coughlan, M.R.; Magi, B.I.; Derr, K.M. A global analysis of hunter-gatherers, broadcast fire use, and lightning-fire-prone landscapes. Fire 2018, 1, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Lewis, H.T. Fire technology and resource management in aboriginal North America and Australia. In Resource Managers: North American and Australian Hunter-Gatherers; Williams, N.M., Hunn, E.S., Eds.; Westview Press: Boulder, CO, USA, 1982; pp. 45–67. [Google Scholar]
  78. Brown, H. Reports of American Indian fire use in the East. Fire Manag. Today 2004, 64, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  79. Bird, R.B.; Bird, D.W.; Codding, B.F.; Parker, C.H.; Jones, J.H. The “fire stick farming” hypothesis: Australian Aboriginal foraging strategies, biodiversity, and anthropogenic fire mosaics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 14796–14801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Gammage, B. The Biggest Estate on Earth: How Aborigines Made Australia; Allen & Unwin: Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  81. Anderson, M.K. Prehistoric anthropogenic wildland burning by hunter-gatherer societies in the temperate regions: A net source, sink or neutral to the global carbon budget? Chemosphere 1994, 29, 913–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Smith, A.G.; Cloutman, E.W. Reconstruction of Holocene vegetation history in three dimensions at Waun-Fignen-Felen, an upland site in south Wales. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 1988, 322, 159–219. [Google Scholar]
  83. Simmons, I.G.; Innes, J.B. Prehistoric charcoal in peat profiles at North Gill, North Yorkshire Moors, England. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1996, 23, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Taylor, J.J.; Innes, J.B.; Jones, M.D.H. Archaeological site location by the integration of geophysical and palynological techniques in an environmental survey role. In Whither Environmental Archaeology? Luff, R.M., Rowley-Conwy, P.A., Eds.; Oxbow: Monograph 38; Oxbow: Oxford, UK, 1994; pp. 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  85. Innes, J.B.; Donaldson, M.; Tooley, M.J. The palaeoenvironmental evidence. In Archaeology and Environment of Submerged Landscapes in Hartlepool Bay, England; Waughman, M., Ed.; Tees Archaeology Monograph Series 2; Tees Archaeology: Hartlepool, UK, 2005; pp. 78–120. [Google Scholar]
  86. Patterson, W.A.; Edwards, K.J.; Maguire, D.J. Microscopic charcoal as a fossil indicator of fire. Quat. Sci. Rev. 1987, 6, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Blackford, J.J. Charcoal fragments in surface samples following a fire and the implications for interpretation of subfossil charcoal data. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2000, 164, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Edwards, K.J.; Whittington, G. Multiple charcoal profiles in a Scottish lake: Taphonomy, fire ecology, human impact and inference. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2000, 164, 67–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Moore, J.M. Can’t see the wood for the trees. In Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose; Albarella, U., Ed.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 211–227. [Google Scholar]
  90. Whitlock, C. Variations in Holocene fire frequency: A view from the western United States. Biol. Environ. Proc. R. Ir. Acad. 2001, 101, 65–77. [Google Scholar]
  91. Mooney, S.D.; Tinner, W. The analysis of charcoal in peat and organic sediments. Mires Peat 2011, 7, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  92. Moore, J.M. Damp squib: How to fire a major deciduous forest in an inclement climate. In The Early Prehistory of Scotland; Pollard, T., Morrison, A., Eds.; Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UK, 1996; pp. 62–73. [Google Scholar]
  93. Rackham, O. The History of the Countryside; Dent: London, UK, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  94. Bennett, K.D.; Simonson, A.B.; Peglar, S.M. Fire and man in postglacial woodlands of eastern England. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1990, 17, 635–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Davies, P.; Robb, J.G.; Ladbrook, D. Woodland clearance in the Mesolithic: The social aspects. Antiquity 2005, 79, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bradshaw, R.H.W. Spatial scale in the pollen record. In Modelling Ecological Change; Harris, D.R., Thomas, K.D., Eds.; Institute of Archaeology; University of London: London, UK, 1991; pp. 41–52. [Google Scholar]
  97. Jacobson, G.L.; Bradshaw, R.H.W. The selection of sites for palaeovegetational studies. Quat. Res. 1981, 16, 80–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bennett, K.D. Competitive interactions among forest tree populations in Norfolk, England, during the last 10,000 years. New Phytol. 1986, 103, 603–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bennett, K.D.; Lamb, H.F. Holocene pollen sequences as a record of competitive interactions among tree populations. TREE 1988, 3, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Tallis, J.H. Plant Community History. Long-Term Changes in Plant Distribution and Diversity; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  101. Prentice, I.C. Climate change and long-term vegetation dynamics. In Plant Succession. Theory and Prediction; Glenn-Lewin, D.C., Peet, R.K., Veblen, T.T., Eds.; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1992; pp. 293–339. [Google Scholar]
  102. Pickett, S.T.A.; White, P.S. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics; Academic Press: Orlando, FL, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  103. Bradshaw, R.H.W. Stand-scale palynology. In Encyclopaedia of Quaternary Science; Elias, S.A., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 2535–2543. [Google Scholar]
  104. Clark, J.S.; Robinson, J. Palaeoecology of fire. In Fire in the Environment: The Ecological, Atmospheric and Climatic Importance of Vegetation Fires; Crutzen, P.J., Goldammer, J.G., Eds.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 1993; pp. 193–214. [Google Scholar]
  105. Whelan, R.J. The Ecology of Fire; Cambridge Studies in Ecology. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  106. Bradshaw, R.H.W.; Miller, N.G. Recent successional processes investigated by pollen analysis of closed-canopy forest sites. Vegetatio 1988, 76, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Calcote, R. Pollen source area and pollen productivity: Evidence from forest hollows. J. Ecol. 1995, 83, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Mitchell, F.J.G.; Cole, E. Reconstruction of long-tern vegetational dynamics in Bialowieza Forest, Poland. J. Ecol. 1998, 86, 1042–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Turner, J.; Innes, J.B.; Simmons, I.G. Spatial diversity in the mid-Flandrian vegetation history of North Gill, North Yorkshire. New Phytol. 1993, 123, 599–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bunting, M.J.; Gaillard, M.-J.; Sugita, S.; Middleton, R.; Broström, A. Vegetation structure and pollen source area. Holocene 2004, 14, 651–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bunting, M.J.; Grant, M.J.; Waller, M. Approaches to quantitative reconstruction of woody vegetation in managed woodlands from pollen records. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2016, 225, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Bradshaw, R.H.W. Modern pollen representation factors for woods in south-east England. J. Ecol. 1981, 69, 45–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Sugita, S. Pollen representation of vegetation in Quaternary sediments: Theory and method in patchy vegetation. J. Ecol. 1994, 82, 881–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Brubaker, L.B. Long term forest dynamics. In Forest Succession: Concepts and Applications; West, D.C., Shuggart, H.H., Botkin, D.B., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1981; pp. 95–106. [Google Scholar]
  115. Birks, H.J.B. Mid-Flandrian forest history of Roudsea Wood National Nature Reserve, Cumbria. New Phytol. 1982, 90, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Mitchell, F.J.G. the investifation of long-term successions in temperate woodland using fine spatial pollen analysis. In The Ecological History of European Forests; Kirby, K.J., Watkins, C., Eds.; CABI Publishing: Oxford, UK, 1998; pp. 213–223. [Google Scholar]
  117. Turner, J.; Innes, J.B.; Simmons, I.G. Two pollen diagrams from the same site. New Phytol. 1989, 113, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Green, D.G.; Dolman, G.S. Fine resolution pollen analysis. J. Biogeogr. 1988, 15, 685–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Barber, K. On the relationship between palaeoecology and neoecology. In Modelling Ecological Change; Harris, D.R., Thomas, K.D., Eds.; Institute of Archaeology; University of London: London, UK, 1991; pp. 13–16. [Google Scholar]
  120. Rodwell, J.S. (Ed.) British Plant Communities Volume 1—Woodlands and Scrub; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  121. Garbett, G.G. The Elm Decline: The depletion of a resource. New Phytol. 1981, 88, 573–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Sturludottir, S.A.; Turner, J. The Elm Decline at Pawlaw Mire: An anthropogenic interpretation. New Phytol. 1985, 99, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Scaife, R. The elm decline in the pollen record of south-east England and its relationship to early agriculture. In Archaeology and the Flora of the British Isles; Jones, M., Ed.; Oxford University Committee for Archaeology, Monograph 14; Oxford University: Oxford, UK, 1988; pp. 21–33. [Google Scholar]
  124. Peglar, S.M. The mid-Holocene Ulmus decline at Diss Mere, Norfolk, UK: A year-by-year pollen stratigraphy from annual laminations. Holocene 1993, 3, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Albert, B.M.; Innes, J.B. Multi-profile fine-resolution palynological and microcharcoal analyses at Esklets, North York Moors, UK, with special reference to the Mesolithic-Neolithic Transition. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 2015, 24, 357–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Dark, P. Palaeoenvironmental investigations. In Star Carr in Context: New Archaeological and Palaeoecological Investigations at the Early Mesolithic Site of Star Carr, North Yorkshire; Mellars, P.A., Dark, P., Eds.; McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge, UK, 1998; pp. 111–181. [Google Scholar]
  127. Simmons, I.G.; Turner, J.; Innes, J.B. An application of fine resolution pollen analysis to later Mesolithic peats of an English upland. In The Mesolithic in Europe; Bonsall, C., Ed.; John Donald: Edinburgh, UK, 1989; pp. 206–217. [Google Scholar]
  128. Simmons, I.G.; Innes, J.B. Disturbance phases in the mid-Holocene vegetation at North Gill, North York Moors: Form and process. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1996, 23, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Simmons, I.G.; Innes, J.B. The ecology of an episode of prehistoric cereal cultivation on the North York Moors, England. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1996, 23, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Innes, J.B.; Blackford, J.J.; Simmons, I.G. Woodland disturbance and possible land-use regimes during the Late Mesolithic in the English uplands: Pollen, charcoal and non-pollen palynomorph evidence from Bluewath Beck, North York Moors, UK. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 2010, 19, 439–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Moore, P.D.; Webb, J.A.; Collinson, M.E. Pollen Analysis; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  132. Stace, C.A. New Flora of the British Isles; C&M Floristics: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  133. Grimm, E.C. TILIA Software; Illinois State Museum: Chicago, IL, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  134. Grimm, E.C. TGView v. 2.0.2, Software; Illinois State Museum; Research and Collections Center: Springfield, IL, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  135. Berglund, B.E.; Ralska-Jasiewiczowa, M. Pollen analysis and pollen diagrams. In Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology; Berglund, B.E., Ed.; John Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1986; pp. 455–484. [Google Scholar]
  136. Innes, J.B.; Simmons, I.G. Mid Holocene charcoal stratigraphy, fire history and palaeoecology at North Gill, North York Moors, UK. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2000, 164, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Clark, R.L. Effects on charcoal of pollen preparation procedures. Pollen Spores 1984, 26, 559–576. [Google Scholar]
  138. Reimer, P.; Austin, W.; Bard, E.; Bayliss, A.; Blackwell, P.; Bronk Ramsey, C.; Butzin, M.; Cheng, H.; Edwards, R.L.; Friedrich, M.; et al. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 2020, 62, 725–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Spikins, P. Mesolithic Northern England: Environment, Population and Settlement; Archaeopress: Oxford, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  140. Donahue, R.E.; Lovis, W.A. Regional settlement systems in Mesolithic Northern England: Scalar issues in mobility and territoriality. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 2006, 25, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Preston, P.R. New perspectives and suggested directions for future research on Central Pennine Mesolithic lithic scatters. The Archaeol. Forum J. CBA Yorkshire 2013, 2, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  142. Preston, P.R.; Kador, T. Approaches to interpreting Mesolithic mobility and settlement in Britain and Ireland. J. World Prehist. 2018, 31, 321–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Cowell, R.W.; Innes, J.B. The Wetlands of Merseyside; North-West Wetlands Survey 1; English Heritage and Lancaster University: Lancaster, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  144. Iversen, J. The Influence of Prehistoric Man on Vegetation. Dan. Geol. Undersøgelse IV 1949, 3, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Innes, J.B.; Blackford, J.J.; Simmons, I.G. Late Mesolithic and early Neolithic forest disturbance: A high-resolution palaeoecological test of human impact hypotheses. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2013, 77, 80–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Connell, J.H.; Slatyer, R.O. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am. Nat. 1977, 111, 1119–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. White, P.S. Pattern, process and natural disturbance in vegetation. Bot. Rev. 1979, 45, 229–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Whitmore, T.C. On pattern and process in forests. In The Plant Community as a Working Mechanism; Newman, E.I., Ed.; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK, 1982; pp. 45–59. [Google Scholar]
  149. Veblen, T.T. Regeneration dynamics. In Plant Succession Theory and Prediction; Glenn-Lewin, D.C., Peet, R.K., Veblen, T.T., Eds.; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1992; pp. 152–187. [Google Scholar]
  150. Muscolo, A.; Bagnato, S.; Sidari, M.; Mercurio, R. A review of the roles of forest canopy gaps. J. For. Res. 2014, 25, 725–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Tipping, R.; Buchanan, J.; Davies, A.; Tisdall, E. Woodland biodiversity, palaeo-human ecology and some implications for conservation management. J. Biogeogr. 1999, 26, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Peet, R.K. Community structure and ecosystem function. In Plant Succession Theory and Prediction; Glenn-Lewin, D.C., Peet, R.K., Veblen, T.T., Eds.; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1993; pp. 103–151. [Google Scholar]
  153. Swanson, M.E.; Franklin, J.F.; Beschta, R.L.; Crisafulli, C.M.; DellaSalla, D.A.; Hutto, R.L.; Lindenmayer, D.B.; Swanson, F.J. The forgotten stage of forest succession: Early-successional ecosystems on forest sites. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2010, 9, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Shafi, M.I.; Yarranton, G.A. Diversity, floristic richness, and species evenness during a secondary (post-fire) succession. Ecology 1973, 54, 897–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Grubb, P.J. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: The importance of the regeneration niche. Biol. Rev. 1977, 52, 107–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Hédl, R.; Kopecký, M.; Komárek, J. Half a century of succession in a temperate oakwood: From species-rich community to mesic forest. Divers. Distrib. 2010, 16, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Kozlowski, T.T.; Ahlgren, C.E. Fire and Ecosystems; Academic Press: London, UK, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  158. Bond, W.J.; van Wilgen, B. Fire and Plants; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  159. Birks, H.J.B. Reconstructing environmental impacts of fire from the Holocene sedimentary record. In Sediment Records of Biomass Burning and Global Change; Clark, J.S., Cachier, H., Goldammer, J.G., Stocks, B., Eds.; NATO ASI Series I: Global Environmental Change; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1997; Volume 51, pp. 295–311. [Google Scholar]
  160. Olsson, F.; Gaillard, M.-J.; Lemdahl, G.; Greisman, A.; Lanos, P.; Marguerie, D.; Marcoux, N.; Skoglund, P.; Wäglind, J. A continuous record of fire covering the last 10,500 Calendar years from southern Sweden—The role of climate and human activities. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2010, 291, 128–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Edwards, K.J.; Whittington, G. Disturbance and regeneration phases in pollen diagrams and their relevance to concepts of marginality. In Life on the Edge: Human Settlement and Marginality; Mills, C.M., Coles, G., Eds.; Symposia of the Association for Environmental Archaeology 13; Oxbow Books: Oxford, UK, 1998; pp. 61–65. [Google Scholar]
  162. Bell, M.; Noble, G. Prehistoric woodland ecology. In Image, Memory and Monumentality; Jones, A.M., Pollard, J., Allen, M.J., Gardiner, J., Eds.; Prehistoric Society Research Paper 5; Oxbow Books: Oxford, UK, 2012; pp. 80–92. [Google Scholar]
  163. Fyfe, R.M.; Woodbridge, J. Differences in time and space in vegetation patterning: Analysis of pollen data from Dartmoor, UK. Landsc. Ecol. 2012, 27, 745–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Innes, J.B.; Simmons, I.G. Disturbance and diversity: Floristic changes associated with pre-elm decline woodland recession in north east Yorkshire. In Archaeology and the Flora of the British Isles; Jones, M., Ed.; Oxford University Committee for Archaeology 14; Oxford University: Oxford, UK, 1988; pp. 7–20. [Google Scholar]
  165. Whitehouse, N.J.; Smith, D.N. ‘‘Islands’’ in Holocene forests: Implications for forest openness, landscape clearance and ‘‘culture-steppe’’ species. Environ. Archaeol. 2004, 9, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Simmons, I.G.; Innes, J.B. Mid-Holocene adaptations and later Mesolithic forest disturbance in northern England. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1987, 14, 385–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Edwards, K.J. Fire and the Scottish Mesolithic: Evidence from microscopic charcoal. In Contributions to the Mesolithic in Europe; Vermeersch, M., Van Peer, P., Eds.; Leuven University Press: Leuven, The Netherlands, 1989; pp. 71–79. [Google Scholar]
  168. Bishop, R.R.; Church, M.J.; Rowley-Conwy, P.A. Seeds, fruits and nuts in the Scottish Mesolithic. Proc. Soc. Antiqu. Scotl. 2013, 143, 9–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Innes, J.B.; Blackford, J.J.; Davey, P.J. Dating the introduction of cereal cultivation to the British Isles: Early palaeoecological evidence from the Isle of Man. J. Quat. Sci. 2003, 18, 603–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Smith, A.G. The influence of Mesolithic and Neolithic man on British vegetation: A discussion. In Studies in the Vegetational History of the British Isles; Walker, D., West, R.G., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1970; pp. 81–96. [Google Scholar]
  171. Smith, A.G. Newferry and the Boreal-Atlantic transition. New Phytol. 1984, 98, 35–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Chambers, F.M.; Elliott, L. Spread and expansion of Alnus Mill in the British Isles: Timing, agencies and possible vectors. J. Biogeogr. 1989, 16, 541–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Roux, I.; Leroi-Gourhan, A. Les défrichments de la période atlantique. Bull. Société Préhistorique Française. Études Trav. 1964, T61, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Selsing, L. Intentional fire management in the Holocene with emphasis on hunter-gatherers in the Mesolithic in South Norway. AmS-Skrifter 2016, 25, 1–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Welinder, S. Mesolithic Forest clearance in Scandinavia. In The Mesolithic in Europe. Papers Presented at the 3rd International Symposium Edinburgh 1985; Bonsall, C., Ed.; John Donald: Edinburgh, UK, 1989; pp. 362–366. [Google Scholar]
  176. Kuneš, P.; Pokorný, P.; Ŝída, D.A. Detection of the impact of early Holocene hunter-gatherers on vegetation in the Czech Republic, using multivariate analysis of pollen data. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 2008, 17, 269–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Divišová, M.; Šída, P. Plant Use in the Mesolithic Period. Archaeobotanical Data from the Czech Republic in a European Context—A Review. Interdiscip. Archaeol. 2015, 6, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Dietze, E.; Theuerkauf, M.; Bloom, K.; Brauer, A.; Dörfler, W.; Feeser, I.; Feurdean, A.; Gedminienė, L.; Giesecke, T.; Jahns, S.; et al. Holocene fire activity during low-natural flammability periods reveals scale-dependent cultural human-fire relationships in Europe. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2018, 201, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Groß, D.; Piezonka, H.; Corradini, E.; Schmölcke, U.; Zanon, M.; Dörfler, W.; Dreibrodt, S.; Feeser, I.; Krüger, S.; Lübke, H.; et al. Adaptations and transformations of hunter-gatherers in forest environments: New archaeological and anthropological insights. Holocene 2019, 29, 1531–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Heidgen, S.; Marinova, E.; Nelle, O.; Ebner, M.; Rotava, T.; Tafelmaier, Y.; Krauss, R.; Bofinger, J.; Junginger, A. Palaeoecological signals for Mesolithic land use in a Central European landscape? J. Quat. Sci. 2022, 37, 1164–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Nikulina, A.; MacDonald, K.; Scherjon, F.; Pearce, E.A.; Davoli, M.; Svenning, J.-C. Tracking hunter-gatherer impact on vegetation in last Interglacial and Holocene Europe: Proxies and challenges. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 2022, 29, 989–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Pokorný, P.; Bobek, P.; Šída, P.; Novák, J.; Ptáková, M.; Walls, M. Managing wilderness? Holocene-scale, human-related disturbance dynamics as revealed in a remote, forested area in the Czech Republic. Holocene 2022, 32, 584–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Bos, J.A.A.; Urz, R. Late Glacial and Early Holocene environment in the middle Lahn river valley (Hessen, central-west Germany) and the local impact of early Mesolithic people—Pollen and macrofossil evidence. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 2003, 12, 19–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Finsinger, W.; Tinner, W.; van der Knaap, W.O.; Ammann, B. The expansion of hazel (Corylus avellana L.) in the southern Alps: A key for understanding its early Holocene history in Europe? Quat. Sci. Rev. 2006, 25, 612–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Holst, D. Hazelnut economy of early Holocene hunter-gatherers: A case study from Mesolithic Duvensee, northern Germany. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2010, 37, 2871–2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Hamburg, T.; Müller, A.; Quadflieg, B. Mesolithisch Swifterbant. Mesolithisch Gebruik van een duin Ten Zuiden van Swifterbant (8300–5000 v. Chr.). Een Archeologische Opgraving in Het Tracé van de N23/N307, Provincie Flevoland; ArcholRapport 174, ADC Rapport 3250; Archol BV: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 157–241. [Google Scholar]
  187. Woldring, H.; Schepers, M.; Mendelts, J.; Fens, R. Camping and foraging in Boreal hazel woodland-The environmental impact of Mesolithic hunter-gatherers near Groningen, the Netherlands. In A Mind Set on Flint. Studies in Honour of Dick Stapert; Niekus, M.J.L.T., Barton, R.N.E., Street, M., Terberger, T., Eds.; Barkhuis Publishing: Groningen, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 381–392. [Google Scholar]
  188. Sevink, J.; van Geel, B.; Jansen, B.; Wallinga, J. Early Holocene forest fires, drift sands, and Usselo-type paleosols in the Laarder Wasmeren area near Hilversum, the Netherlands: Implications for the history of sand landscapes and the potential role of Mesolithic land use. Catena 2018, 165, 286–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Wick, L. Early Holocene reforestation and vegetation change at a lake near the alpine forest limit Lago Basso (2250 m asl), northern Italy. Diss. Bot. 1994, 234, 555–563. [Google Scholar]
  190. Colombaroli, D.; Vannière, B.; Emmanuel, C.; Magny, M.; Tinner, W. Fire-vegetation interactions during the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition at Lago dell’Accesa, Tuscany, Italy. Holocene 2008, 18, 679–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Kaal, J.; Marco, Y.C.; Asouti, E.; Seijo, M.M.; Cortizas, A.M.; Casáis, M.C.; Boado, F.C. Long term deforestation in NW Spain: Linking the Holocene fire history to vegetation change and human activities. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2011, 30, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Hörnberg, G.; Bohlin, E.; Hellberg, E.; Bergman, I.; Zackrisson, O.; Olofsson, A.; Wallin, J.; Påsse, T. Effects of Mesolithic hunter-gatherers on local vegetation in a non-uniform glacio-isostatic land uplift area, northern Sweden. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotanty 2005, 15, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Hjelle, K.L.; Lødøen, T.K. Dating of rock art and the effect of human activity on vegetation: The complementary use of archaeological and scientific methods. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2017, 168, 194–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Wiekowska-Lüth, M.; Wiebke, W.; Dörfler, W. Holocene history of landscape development in the catchment of Lake Skogstjern, southeastern Norway, based on a high-resolution, multi-proxy record. Holocene 2017, 27, 1928–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Latałowa, M. Man and vegetation in the pollen diagrams from Wolin Island (NW Poland). Acta Palaeobot. 1992, 32, 123–249. [Google Scholar]
  196. Gumiński, W. Environment, economy and habitation during the Mesolithic at Dudka, Great Mazurian Lakeland, NE-Poland. Przegl. Archeol. 1995, 43, 5–46. [Google Scholar]
  197. Bos, J.A.A. Lateglacial and Early Holocene vegetation history of the northern Wetterau and the Amöneburger Basin (Hessen), central-west Germany. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol 2001, 115, 177–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Poska, A.; Saarse, L.; Veski, S. Reflections of pre- and early-agrarian human impact in the pollen diagrams of Estonia. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol, Palaeoecol. 2004, 209, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Wacnik, A. From foraging to farming in the Great Mazurian Lake District: Palynological studies on lake Miłkowskie sediments, northeast Poland. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 2009, 18, 187–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Woelders, L.; Bos, J.A.A.; de Kort, J.-W.; Hoek, W.Z. Early Holocene environmental change and the presence of Mesolithic people in the Tungelroyse Beek valley near Mildert, The Netherlands. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 2016, 25, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Bobek, P.; Svobodová, H.S.; Werchan, B.; Švarcová, M.G.; Kuneš, P. Human-induced changes in fire regime and subsequent alteration of the sandstone landscape of Northern Bohemia (Czech Republic). Holocene 2018, 28, 427–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Groß, D.; Lübke, H.; Schmölcke, U.; Zanon, M. Early Mesolithic activities at ancient Lake Duvensee, northern Germany. Holocene 2019, 29, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Sobkowiak-Tabaka, I.; Pawłowski, D.; Milecka, K.; Kubiak-Martens, L.; Kostecki, R.; Janczak-Kostecka, B.; Goslar, T.; Ratajczak-Szczerba, M. Multi-proxy records of Mesolithic activity in the Lubuskie Lakeland (Western Poland). Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 2020, 29, 153–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Birks, H.J.B.; Deacon, J.; Peglar, S. Pollen maps for the British Isles 5000 years ago. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1975, 189, 87–105. [Google Scholar]
  205. Tallis, J.H.; Switsur, V.R. Forest and moorland in the South Pennine uplands in the mid-Flandrian period. I. Macrofossil evidence of the former forest cover. J. Ecol. 1983, 71, 585–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Turner, J.; Hodgson, J. Studies in the vegetational history of the northern Pennines, I. Variations in the composition of the early Flandrian forests. J. Ecol. 1979, 67, 629–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Turner, J.; Hodgson, J. Studies in the vegetational history of the northern Pennines III. Variations in the composition of the mid-Flandrian forests. J. Ecol. 1983, 71, 95–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Turner, J.; Hodgson, J. Studies in the vegetational history of the northern Pennines. IV. Variations in the composition of the Late Flandrian forests and comparisons with those of the early amd mid-Flandrian. J. Ecol. 1991, 117, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Maguire, D.J.; Caseldine, C.J. The former distribution of forest and moorland on northern Dartmoor. Area 1985, 17, 193–203. [Google Scholar]
  210. Simmons, I.G.; Innes, J.B. Tree remains in a North York Moors peat profile. Nature 1981, 294, 76–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Bennett, K.D. Post-glacial vegetation history: Ecological considerations. In Vegetation History; Huntley, B., Webb, T., III, Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988; pp. 699–724. [Google Scholar]
  212. West, D.C.; Shuggart, H.H.; Botkin, D.B. (Eds.) Forest Succession: Concepts and Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  213. Halpern, C.B. Early successional pathways and the resistance and resilience of forest communities. Ecology 1988, 69, 1703–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Lloret, F.; Estevan, H.; Vayreda, J.; Terradas, J. Fire regenerative syndromes of forest woody species across fire and climatic gradients. Oecologia 2005, 146, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Franklin, J.F.; Lindenmayer., D.B.; MacMahon, J.A.; McKee, A.; Magnuson, S.; Perry, D.A.; Waide, R.; Foster, D. Threads of continuity: Ecosystem disturbances, biological legacies and ecosystem recovery. Conserv. Biol. Pract. 2000, 1, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Packham, J.R.; Cohn, E.V.J. Ecology of the woodland field layer. Arboric. J. 1990, 14, 357–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Van Hulst, R. From population dynamics to community dynamics: Modelling succession as a species replacement process. In Plant Succession Theory and Prediction; Glenn-Lewin, D.C., Peet, R.K., Veblen, T.T., Eds.; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1992; pp. 188–214. [Google Scholar]
  218. Sagar, G.R.; Harper, J.L. Plantago Major L., P. Media L. and P. Lanceolata L. J. Ecol. 1964, 52, 189–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Horrill, A.D. Biological Flora of the British Isles: Melampyrum cristatum L. J. Ecol. 1972, 60, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Moore, P.D.; Evans, A.T.; Chater, M. Palynological and stratigraphic evidence for hydrological changes in mires associated with human activity. In Anthropogenic Indicators in Pollen Diagrams; Behre, K.-E., Ed.; Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1986; pp. 209–220. [Google Scholar]
  221. Dalrymple, S.E. Biological flora of the British Isles: Melampyrum sylvaticum L. J. Ecol. 2007, 95, 583–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Delarze, R.; Caldelari, D.; Hainard, P. Effects of fire on forest dynamics in southern Switzerland. J. Veg. Sci. 1992, 3, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Marozas, V.; Racinskas, J.; Bartkevicius, E. Dynamics of ground vegetation after surface fires in hemiboreal Pinus sylvestris L. forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2007, 250, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Tinsley, H.M. The former woodland of the Nidderdale Moors and the role of early man in its decline. J. Ecol. 1975, 63, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Rowell, T.K.; Turner, J. Litho-, humic- and pollen stratigraphy at Quick Moss, Northumberland. J. Ecol. 1985, 73, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  226. Ryan, P.A.; Blackford, J.J. Late Mesolithic environmental change at Black Heath, South Pennines, UK: A test of Mesolithic woodland management models using pollen, charcoal and non-pollen palynomorph data. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 2010, 19, 545–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Berglund, B.E. Late Quaternary Vegetation in Eastern Blekinge, South-eastern Sweden. A Pollen-analytical Study: II. Post-glacial Time. Opera Bot. Soc. Bot. Lund. 1966, 12, 1–90. [Google Scholar]
  228. Mamakowa, K. Lille Buken and Leroy—Two pollen diagrams from Norway. Årbok Univ. Bergen 1968, 4, 1–42. [Google Scholar]
  229. Pilcher, J.R.; Smith, A.G. Palaeoecological investigations at Ballynagilly, a Neolithic and Bronze Age settlement in County Tyrone, Northern Ireland. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 1979, 286, 345–369. [Google Scholar]
  230. Chambers, F.M. The palaeoecological setting of Cefn Gwerffrwd—A prehistoric complex in mid-Wales. Proc. Prehist. Soc. 1983, 49, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Ugla, E. Ecological Effects of Fire in North Swedish Forests; Almquivist and Wiksel: Stockholm, Sweden, 1950. [Google Scholar]
  232. Malmivaara, M.; Löfström, I.; Vanha-Majamaa, I. Anthropogenic effects on understorey vegetation in Myrtillus Type urban forests in Southern Finland. Silva Fenn. 2002, 36, 367–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  233. Hjelle, K.L. Relationships between pollen and plants in human-influenced vegetation types using presence-absence data in western Norway. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 1997, 99, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Rodwell, J.S. (Ed.) British Plant Communities Volume 2—Mires and Heaths; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  235. Marrs, R.H.; Watt, A.S. 2006. Biological flora of the British Isles: Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn. J. Ecol. 2006, 94, 1272–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Marrs, R.H.; Le Duc, M.G.; Mitchell, R.J.; Goddard, D.; Paterson, S.; Pakeman, R.J. The ecology of bracken: Its role in succession and implications for control. Anal. Bot. 2000, 85, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  237. Vesk, P.A.; Westoby, M. Sprouting ability across diverse disturbances and vegetation types worldwide. J. Ecol. 2004, 92, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Pausas, J.G.; Bradstock., R.A.; Keith, D.A.; Keeley, J.E. The GCTE (Global Change of Terrestrial Ecosystems) Fire Network. Ecology 2004, 85, 1085–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  239. Tinner, W.; Gobet, E.; Conedera, M.; Hubschmid, P.; Wehrli, M.; Ammann, B. A palaeoecological attempt to classify fire sensitivity of trees in the southern Alps. Holocene 2000, 10, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Thiele, J.; Isermann, M.; Otte, A.; Kollman, J. Competitive displacement or biotic resistance? Disentangling relationships between community diversity and invasion success of tall herbs and shrubs. J. Veg. Sci. 2010, 21, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Grime, J.P. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  242. Kirby, K.J. The impact of deer on the ground flora of British broadleaved woodland. Forestry 2001, 74, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  243. Clarke, D. Mesolithic Europe: The economic basis. In Problems in Economic and Social Archaeology; Sieveking, G.d.G., Longworth, I.H., Wilson, K.E., Eds.; Duckworth: London, UK, 1976; pp. 449–481. [Google Scholar]
  244. Göransson, H. Neolithic Man and the Forest Environment Around Alvastra Pile Dwelling; Theses and Papers in North-European Archaeology 20; Lund University Press: Stockholm, Sweden, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  245. Edwards, K.J. Man, space and the woodland edge: Speculations on the detection of human impact in pollen profiles. In Archaeological Aspects of Woodland Ecology; Bell, M., Limbrey, S., Eds.; Oxford: British Archaeological Reports; International Series No. 146; British Archaeological Reports Oxford Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 1982; pp. 5–22. [Google Scholar]
  246. Zvelebil, M. Plant use in the Mesolithic and its role in the transition to farming. Proc. Prehist. Soc. 1994, 60, 35–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Regnell, M. Plant subsistence and environment at the Mesolithic site Tågerup, southern Sweden: New insights on the ‘Nut Age’. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 2012, 21, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  248. Wacnik, A.; Gumiński, W.; Cywa, K.; Bugajska, K. Forests and foragers: Exploitation of wood resources by Mesolithic and para-Neolithic societies in northeastern Poland. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 2020, 29, 717–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  249. Huntley, B. Rapid early-Holocene migration and high abundance of hazel (Corylus avellana L.): Alternative hypotheses. In Climate Change and Human Impact on the Landscape; Chambers, F.M., Ed.; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1993; pp. 205–216. [Google Scholar]
  250. Tinner, W.; Hubschmid, P.; Wehrli, M.; Ammann, B.; Conedera, M. Long-term forest fire ecology and dynamics in southern Switzerland. J. Ecol. 1999, 87, 273–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Grime, J.P.; Hodgson, J.G.; Hunt, R. Comparative Plant Ecology; Unwin Ltd.: London, UK, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  252. Catoni, R.; Granata, M.U.; Sartori, F.; Varone, L.; Gratani, L. Corylus avellana responsiveness to light variations: Morphological, anatomical, and physiological leaf trait plasticity. Photosynthetica 2015, 53, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Honnay, O.; Verheyen, K.; Bossuyt, B.; Hermy, M. (Eds.) Forest Biodiversity: Lessons from History for Conservation; CAB International: Oxford, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  254. Dodson, J. Fine resolution pollen analysis of vegetation history in the Lough Adoon Valley, Co. Kerry, western Ireland. Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 1990, 64, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Urban, D.L.; Shugart, H.H. Individual-based models of forest succession. In Plant Succession Theory and Prediction; Glenn-Lewin, D.C., Peet, R.K., Veblen, T.T., Eds.; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1992; pp. 248–292. [Google Scholar]
  256. Sugita, S.; MacDonald, G.M.; Larsen, C.P.S. Reconstruction of fire disturbance and forest succession from fossil pollen in lake sediments: Potential and limitations. In Sediment Records of Biomass Burning and Global Change; Clark, J.S., Cachier, H., Goldammer, J.G., Stocks, B., Eds.; NATO ASI Series I: Global Environmental Change; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1997; Volume 51, pp. 387–412. [Google Scholar]
  257. Worrell, R.; Nixon, C.J. Factors Affecting the Natural Regeneration of Oak in Upland Britain; Forestry Commision Occasional Paper 31; Forestry Commission: Edinburgh, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  258. Abrams, M.D. Fire and the development of oak forests. BioScience 1992, 42, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Mason, S.L.R. Fire and Mesolithic subsistence—Managing oaks for acorns in northwest Europe? Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2000, 164, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Glenn-Lewin, D.C.; van der Maarel, E. Patterns and processes of vegetation dynamics. In Plant Succession Theory and Prediction; Glenn-Lewin, D.C., Peet, R.K., Veblen, T.T., Eds.; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1992; pp. 11–59. [Google Scholar]
  261. Jones, R.L. Late Quaternary vegetational history of the North York Moors IV: Seamer Carrs. J. Biogeogr. 1976, 3, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Bush, M.B. early Mesolithic disturbance: A force on the landscape. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1988, 15, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Cloutman, E.W. Palaeoenvironments in the Vale of Pickering Part 2: Environmental history at Seamer Carr. Proc. Prehist. Soc. 1988, 54, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Simmons, I.G.; Cummins, G.E.; Taylor, B.; Innes, J.B. Lateglacial to mid-Holocene vegetation history in the eastern Vale of Pickering, northeast Yorkshire, UK: Pollen diagrams from palaeolake Flixton. Quaternary 2022, 5, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Smith, A.G.; Whittle, A.; Cloutman, E.W.; Morgan, I.A. Mesolithic and Neolithic activity and environmental impact on the south-east fen-edge in Cambridgeshire. Proc. Prehist. Soc. 1989, 55, 207–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Tipping, R.M.; Milburn, P. Mid-Holocene charcoal fall in southern Scotland—Temporal and spatial variability. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2000, 164, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Greisman, A.; Gaillard, M.J. The role of climate variability and fire in early and mid-Holocene forest dynamics of southern Sweden. J. Quat. Sci. 2009, 24, 593–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Kirby, K.J.; Watkins, C. (Eds.) The Ecological History of European Forests: From Woodland to Managed Landscapes; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  269. Moore, J.M. The infernal cycle of fire ecology. In Neolithic Landscapes; Topping, P., Ed.; Neolithic Studies Group Seminar Papers 2; Oxbow: Oxford, UK, 1997; pp. 33–40. [Google Scholar]
  270. Moore, J.M. Forest fire and human interaction in the early Holocene woodlands of Britain. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2000, 164, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Göransson, H. Man and the forests of the nemoral broad-leaved trees during the Stone Age. Striae 1986, 24, 43–52. [Google Scholar]
  272. Kubiak-Martens, L. The plant food component of the diet at the late Mesolithic (Ertebølle) settlement at Tybrind Vig, Denmark. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 1999, 8, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Kubiak-Martens, L. New evidence for the use of root foods in pre-agrarian subsistence recovered from the late Mesolithic site at Halsskov, Denmark. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 2002, 11, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Bishop, R.R.; Kubiak-Martens, L.; Warren, G.M.; Church, M.J. Getting to the root of the problem: New evidence for the use of plant root foods in Mesolithic hunter-gatherer subsistence in Europe. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 2023, 32, 65–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Gearey, B.R.; Charman, D.J.; Kent, M. Palaeoecological evidence for the prehistoric settlement of Bodmin Moor, Cornwall, Southwest England. Part I: The status of woodland and early human impacts. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2000, 27, 423–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Huntley, B. Quaternary palaeoecology and ecology. Quat. Sci. Rev. 1996, 15, 591–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Tallantire, P.A. The early-Holocene spread of hazel (Corylus avellana L.) in Europe north and west of the Alps: An ecological hypothesis. Holocene 2002, 12, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Mighall, T.M.; Chambers, F.M. Holocene vegetation history and human impact at Bryn-Y-Castell, Snowdonia, North Wales. New Phytol. 1995, 130, 299–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Barnett, C. The chronology of Early Mesolithic occupation and environmental impact at Thatcham Reedbeds, southern England. In Chronology and Evolution in the Mesolithic of N(W) Europe; Crombé, P., van Strydonck, M., Sergant, J., Boudin, M., Bats, M., Eds.; Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2009; pp. 57–76. [Google Scholar]
  280. Bridgland, D.R.; Innes, J.B.; Long, A.J.; Mitchell, W.A. Late Quaternary Landscape Evolution of the Swale-Ure Washlands, North Yorkshire; Oxbow Books: Oxford, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  281. Edwards, K.J. Palynology and people: Observations on the British record. Quat. Proc. 1999, 7, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Packham, J.R.; Harding, D.J.L. Ecology of Woodland Processes; Arnold: London, UK, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  283. Evans, N.M.; Barkham, J.P. Coppicing and natural disturbance in temperate woodlands: A review. In Ecology and Management of Coppice Woodlands; Buckley, G.P., Ed.; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1992; pp. 79–98. [Google Scholar]
  284. Bond, W.J.; Midgley, J.J. Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: The persistence niche. TREE 2001, 16, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. McComb, A.M.G.; Simpson, D. The wild bunch: Exploitation of the hazel in prehistoric Ireland. Ulster J. Archaeol. 1999, 58, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  286. McComb, A.M.G. The ecology of hazel (Corylus avellana) nuts in Mesolithic Ireland. In Mesolithic Horizons; McCartan, S.B., Schulting, R., Warren, G., Woodman, P., Eds.; Oxbow Books: Oxford, UK, 2009; pp. 225–231. [Google Scholar]
  287. Zvelebil, M. Hunting, Gathering, or Husbandry? Management of food resources by the Late Mesolithic communities of temperate Europe. In Before Farming. Hunter-Gatherer Society and Subsistence; Campana, D.V., Ed.; University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1995; pp. 79–104. [Google Scholar]
  288. Clark, J.S.; Merkt, J.; Muller, H. Post-glacial fire, vegetation and human history on the northern Alpine forelands, south-western Germany. J. Ecol. 1989, 77, 897–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Barton, R.N.E.; Berridge, P.J.; Walker, M.J.C.; Bevins, R.E. Persistent places in the Mesolithic landscape: An example from the Black Mountain uplands of South Wales. Proc. Prehist. Soc. 1995, 61, 81–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Pickett, S.T.A.; Wu, J.; Cadenasso, M.L. Patch dynamics and the ecology of disturbed ground. In Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground; Walker, L.R., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; pp. 707–722. [Google Scholar]
  291. Bormann, F.H.; Likens, G.E. Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  292. Price, T.D.; Gebauer, A.B. (Eds.) Smakkerup Huse: A Late Mesolithic Coastal Site in Northwest Zealand, Denmark; Aarhus University Press: Aarhus, Denmark, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  293. McQuade, M.; O’Donnell, L. Late Mesolithic fish-traps from the Liffey Estuary, Dublin, Ireland. Antiquity 2007, 81, 569–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Magyari, E.; Chapman, J.; Fairbairn, A.S.; Francis, M.; de Guzman, M. Neolithic human impact on the landscapes of north-east Hungary inferred from pollen and settlement records. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 2012, 21, 279–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  295. Mithen, S.; Finlay, N.; Carruthers, W.; Carter, S.; Ashmore, P. Plant use in the Mesolithic: Evidence from Staosnaig, Isle of Colonsay, Scotland. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2001, 28, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Leopold, A. Deer on sub-climax vegetational stages. Trans. North Am. Wildl. Conf. 1950, 15, 571–580. [Google Scholar]
  297. Innes, J.B.; Blackford, J.J. The ecology of Late Mesolithic woodland disturbances: Model testing with fungal spore assemblage data. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2003, 30, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Göransson, H. Pollen analytical investigations in the Sligo area. In Archaeology of Carrowmore; Burenhult, G., Ed.; Theses and Papers in North-European Archaeology 14; University of Stockholm: Stockholm, Sweden, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  299. Jarman, M.R. European deer economies and the advent of the Neolithic. In Papers in Economic Prehistory; Higgs, E.S., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  300. Mellars, P. Fire ecology, animal populations and man: A study of some ecological relationships in prehistory. Proc. Prehist. Soc. 1976, 42, 15–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the four sites studied in this paper. North Gill and Bonfield Gill Head are at about 350 m above sea level on the North York Moors in northeast North Yorkshire. Little Hawes Water and Sniggery Wood are lowland sites in North Lancashire and Merseyside, respectively. The dark green areas are land above 200 m altitude.
Figure 1. Location of the four sites studied in this paper. North Gill and Bonfield Gill Head are at about 350 m above sea level on the North York Moors in northeast North Yorkshire. Little Hawes Water and Sniggery Wood are lowland sites in North Lancashire and Merseyside, respectively. The dark green areas are land above 200 m altitude.
Forests 14 00719 g001
Figure 2. Selected taxa pollen diagram through a Mesolithic age disturbance phase at Sniggery Wood, Merseyside. Frequencies are calculated as percentages of total tree pollen, which comprises Betula to Alnus on the diagram.
Figure 2. Selected taxa pollen diagram through a Mesolithic age disturbance phase at Sniggery Wood, Merseyside. Frequencies are calculated as percentages of total tree pollen, which comprises Betula to Alnus on the diagram.
Forests 14 00719 g002
Figure 3. Selected taxa pollen diagram through a Mesolithic age disturbance phase at Little Hawes Water. Frequencies are calculated as percentages of total tree pollen, which comprises Betula to Alnus on the diagram.
Figure 3. Selected taxa pollen diagram through a Mesolithic age disturbance phase at Little Hawes Water. Frequencies are calculated as percentages of total tree pollen, which comprises Betula to Alnus on the diagram.
Forests 14 00719 g003
Figure 4. Selected taxa pollen diagram through a Mesolithic age disturbance phase at North Gill 7. Frequencies are calculated as percentages of total tree pollen, which comprises Betula to Fraxinus in the diagram.
Figure 4. Selected taxa pollen diagram through a Mesolithic age disturbance phase at North Gill 7. Frequencies are calculated as percentages of total tree pollen, which comprises Betula to Fraxinus in the diagram.
Forests 14 00719 g004
Figure 5. Selected taxa pollen diagram through a Mesolithic age disturbance phase at Bonfield Gill Head. Frequencies are calculated as percentages of total tree pollen, which comprises Pinus to Fraxinus in the diagram. Betula and Alnus are excluded because of local superabundance at this site.
Figure 5. Selected taxa pollen diagram through a Mesolithic age disturbance phase at Bonfield Gill Head. Frequencies are calculated as percentages of total tree pollen, which comprises Pinus to Fraxinus in the diagram. Betula and Alnus are excluded because of local superabundance at this site.
Forests 14 00719 g005
Table 1. Radiocarbon dating at Sniggery Wood, Little Hawes Water (LHW), North Gill 7 and Bonfield Gill Head.
Table 1. Radiocarbon dating at Sniggery Wood, Little Hawes Water (LHW), North Gill 7 and Bonfield Gill Head.
SiteDepth (cm)Lab Code14C Date (yr BP)Age Range (cal. BC)Mean Age (cal. BC)
Sniggery Wood11–13SRR-26984510 ± 503029–33633196 ± 167
Sniggery Wood171–174SRR-26995770 ± 504492–47264609 ± 117
LHW ESE367–68Wk-200786865 ± 585644–58785761 ± 117
North Gill 772SRR-36544940 ± 453641–38943767 ± 126
North Gill 776SRR-36555645 ± 454360–45824471 ± 111
North Gill 780SRR-36566710 ± 505543–57155629 ± 86
North Gill 782SRR-36576735 ± 455563–57235643 ± 80
Bonfield Gill Head46Wk-162734644 ± 433350–36233486 ± 136
Bonfield Gill Head75Wk-151525874 ± 444615–48444730 ± 115
Bonfield Gill Head83Wk-151546122 ± 464944–52115077 ± 133
Bonfield Gill Head99Wk-157456854 ± 465646–58415743 ± 97
Age range (2δ) and mean derived from calibration results using Oxcal4.4 and IntCal20 [138].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Innes, J.B.; Blackford, J.J. Disturbance and Succession in Early to Mid-Holocene Northern English Forests: Palaeoecological Evidence for Disturbance of Woodland Ecosystems by Mesolithic Hunter-Gatherers. Forests 2023, 14, 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040719

AMA Style

Innes JB, Blackford JJ. Disturbance and Succession in Early to Mid-Holocene Northern English Forests: Palaeoecological Evidence for Disturbance of Woodland Ecosystems by Mesolithic Hunter-Gatherers. Forests. 2023; 14(4):719. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040719

Chicago/Turabian Style

Innes, James B., and Jeffrey J. Blackford. 2023. "Disturbance and Succession in Early to Mid-Holocene Northern English Forests: Palaeoecological Evidence for Disturbance of Woodland Ecosystems by Mesolithic Hunter-Gatherers" Forests 14, no. 4: 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040719

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop