Next Article in Journal
MangroveSeg: Deep-Supervision-Guided Feature Aggregation Network for Mangrove Detection and Segmentation in Satellite Images
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Large-Scale Fire and Habitat Type on Ant Nest Density and Species Abundance in Biebrza National Park, Poland
Previous Article in Special Issue
A New Advance on the Improvement of Forest Ecosystem Functions in the Karst Desertification Control
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Global Situation of Karst Desertification Research Based on Forest Ecology

1
Tangshan Key Laboratory of Simulation and Monitoring of Urban System Low-Carbon Development, Department of Resource Management, Tangshan Normal University, Tangshan 063002, China
2
College of Life Sciences and Institute of Agro-Bioengineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
3
College of History and Cultural Tourism, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2024, 15(1), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15010126
Submission received: 28 October 2023 / Revised: 24 December 2023 / Accepted: 5 January 2024 / Published: 8 January 2024

Abstract

:
Karst desertification (KD) is a major ecological and environmental problem threatening human survival and development in karst areas. In order to explore the research situation and development trend of KD based on forest ecology, this paper provides a systematic literature review based on the CNKI and WoS databases, which involves search, appraisal, synthesis, and analysis. We performed a statistical and visual analysis of 2955 studies acquired between 1 January 1995 and 30 June 2023, including the time distribution of the studies, hot research trends, pivotal research clusters, literature co-citations, main publishing trends, and keyword bursts. The results show the following. (1) The literature shows a fluctuating growth trend, and the research trends are divided into accumulation, development, and expansion stages. (2) The pivotal research clusters comprised three major aspects: study area and method, driving and genetic mechanisms, and control technology and models. (3) KD research forms a China-centered research network, dominated by institutions and scholars in southwestern China. (4) Future research needs to solve a series of related scientific issues and technological needs for forest ecosystem function optimization, ecological product supply capacity enhancement, ecological product value realization, ecological industry formation, and rural revitalization in KD control. The purpose of this paper is to reveal research trends relating to KD and highlight the future direction of KD research and control.

1. Introduction

Karst comprises a variety of surface and underground landscapes and phenomena caused by the dissolution of soluble rocks by water, with a clear binary geomorphic structure [1,2]. Karst areas account for 15% of the global land and house approximately 1 billion people worldwide [1]. South China, central southern Europe, and eastern North America have become the three major karst areas in the world [3]. About one-seventh of China is made up of karst, which is distributed in the northeast, north, and southwest, especially from Yunnan in the west to Guizhou, Guangxi, and Guangdong in the east, and South China is the most continuous karst area in the world [4,5]. The various bare, semi-bare, and buried carbonate beds of developing karst cover 70% of the total area of China, of which the bare area covers 125 × 104 km2 in 21 provinces (districts), accounting for 14% of the land area of China [6,7].
Karst desertification (KD) is an evolutional process of the land surface that causes deforestation, soil erosion, gradual exposure of rocks, and great loss of land productivity in prominent human–land conflicts, visually resembling a desert landscape due to unreasonable human socio-economic activities in the fragile ecological environment of the karst [8,9,10]. Since the 1980s, research on KD has increased gradually. At the 149th Annual Conference organized by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), karst and desert edge areas were equally considered vulnerable environments [11]. Karst resources and environments are characterized by fragility, sensitivity, vulnerability, and low natural regeneration ability [1,12]. China’s karst areas are home to a large population, and the ecological environment and KD issues are gradually receiving more attention. Chinese scholars have successively introduced such terms as rocky mountain, stony mountain, rocky desertification, stony desertification, karst desertification, and karst rocky desertification [13,14,15,16,17,18]. Su et al. published the first paper on KD in Chinese [19]. Yuan published his first English paper on KD and brought international attention to the issue [20].
In recent years, KD research has attracted many scholars. Kangning Xiong, a geographer from Guizhou Normal University, defined the concept of KD, formulated the criteria for grading KD, researched the formation mechanism of KD [9], and pioneered scientific control models of KD such as “Huajiang”, “Bijie”, and “Qingzhen” [21,22,23]. He designed and led the construction of the ecosystem function optimization model and the technical path to enhance the supply capacity of ecological products, constructed the rural ecological industry revitalization model, and pointed out how to realize the value of these products [24,25,26,27]. Zhongcheng Jiang, a geologist from the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, studied the karst dynamic system [28], proposed a comprehensive strategy for the prevention and control of KD and soil erosion [29], and carried out a survey and research on karst carbon sinks [30]. He carried out an innovative comparative study, established a monitoring station network in the karst critical zone [31], and proposed the demonstration project of carbon sinks for KD control [32]. Kelin Wang, an ecologist from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, studied soil characteristics and vegetation adaptation in KD areas [33], established a monitoring and evaluation system for KD ecosystems [34,35], and researched the response of spatial and temporal changes in the value of ecosystem services to landscape patterns [36]. He innovated and established a scientific and technological poverty alleviation system for ecological control and poverty alleviation and development [37] and proposed a landscape change model to improve the study of karst hydrological and soil processes and landscape design [38]. Currently, key institutions and authors are designing and leading future research directions of KD. Therefore, it is of great significance to elucidate the research situation of KD and point out the direction of future hot research in order to improve the control of KD and improve the forest ecological environment.
At present, a large number of KD research and control projects have been carried out, involving KD driving mechanisms, spatial and temporal evolution, subsurface leakage of soil, the application of spatial technology, ecological restoration, soil and water conservation, the eco-industry, model demonstration, industrial poverty alleviation, control technology, evaluation systems, carbon sinks, ecosystem services, ecological products, and so on [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Although these works provide a great deal of research on KD control, there is a lack of understanding of the overall research trends in this field, and there is a need for an overview of research on KD. Reviews on KD, such as narrative literature reviews [53,54] and meta-analyses [55,56], provide an overview of only one relevant area of KD and rarely visually analyze the literature. There are also some reviews that only summarize the status and outlook of KD research in different regions [21,22], lacking a summary and discussion of the overall global research on the issue. Therefore, in this review, we adopt a systematic literature review approach and CiteSpaceV.6.2.R2 analysis to study the overall KD research trend based on forest ecology, providing insights for future research.
KD is distributed to varying degrees across the karst areas of the world, especially South China karst. It threatens ecological security; restricts food production; exacerbates soil erosion; causes floods, droughts, mudslides, and landslides; and affects regional economic and social developments. Desertification not only worsens the ecological environment and production conditions but also destroys the basic conditions for human survival, making it difficult for one part of the soil and water to support one part of the population (Figure 1). In the 21st century, the Chinese government has begun to attach importance to controlling KD and has vigorously implemented control projects. At present, there is an urgent need to scientifically summarize KD research and control in order to highlight the direction for the next stage of the process. We systematically reviewed the global research situation of KD using a systematic literature review approach and visual analysis based on the literature related to KD on China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Web of Science (WoS) from 1 January 1995 to 30 June 2023. This paper aims to (1) clarify the development stage of KD research; (2) explore the hot research trends, pivotal research clusters, literature co-citations, and global publishing trends in the field of KD based on forest ecology; and (3) reveal the future direction of KD research and control. As a result, it is essential to scientifically summarize the literature, determine progress, analyze hotspots, and further promote KD control.

2. Materials and Methods

We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol for a systematic search and review [57,58]. For scientific quantitative assessment, we used a systematic literature review framework including protocol, search, appraisal, and synthesis reports. The approach is characterized by transparency, portability, and replicability [59,60] and has been applied in various subject areas [61,62]. We used CiteSpaceV.6.2.R2 visual analysis to identify time zone visualization of hot keywords, timeline visualization of pivotal research clusters, time zone visualization of the literature co-citations and countries, institutions, and author collaborative mapping.

2.1. Protocol

In order to determine the scope of this study, we carry out the following: (1) count the number of studies based on six months of bibliometrics and divide them into research phases; (2) identify the hot keywords and hot KD research trends; (3) identify the pivotal research clusters on KD; (4) identify the literature co-citations; (5) establish which countries, institutions, and authors are involved in global KD research; and (6) establish the future research direction.

2.2. Search

The data in this study are sourced from the CNKI database and WoS core collection (Table 1). The retrieval period is from 1 January 1995 to 30 June 2023. In the CNKI database, using subject items for retrieval, the subject terms are “rocky mountain”, “stony mountain”, “rocky desertification”, “stony desertification”, “karst desertification”, and “karst rocky desertification”. Studies are selected based on sources (SCI, SSCI, EI, PKU, CSCD, CSSCI, Ph.D. dissertations, and master’s theses). In total, 9289 Chinese studies were retrieved. In the WoS core collection, using subject items for retrieval, the terms are “karst rocky desertification”, “karst desertification”, “rocky desertification”, and “stony desertification”. The types of literature included are journal articles and reviews, conference papers, theses, and books. In total, 852 English studies were retrieved.
As an important English literature database, WoS can retrieve the most authoritative articles related to KD. However, because KD research is mainly conducted in China, we also selected CNKI, which is the largest Chinese literature database, has the largest number of KD studies, and can retrieve the most comprehensive and important research. Thus, we chose the WoS and CNKI databases to retrieve studies. Because KD has multiple names, in order to maximize the inclusion of studies related to KD research, we tried to use all the synonymous terms for KD found in the two databases as search terms by extensively reading the literature.

2.3. Appraisal

We used inclusion and exclusion criteria to select research related to this review based on the initial search results (Figure 2). Inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) the search term should exist at least in the title, abstract, and keywords of the study; (2) studies in CNKI and WoS databases; (3) retrieve studies based on KD research in the literature; (4) studies in English or Chinese; (5) the types of studies include journal articles and reviews, conference papers, books, Ph.D. dissertations, and master’s theses; (6) studies published between 1 January 1995 and 30 June 2023. Exclusion criteria include (1) duplicates in the literature; (2) non-KD primary research studies; (3) unavailable literature; and (4) studies of low relevance to KD research. The specific methodology is based on the following screening criteria:
(1)
Searching for terms by time frame; study types included journal articles, reviews, editorials, books, doctoral dissertations, and master’s theses, and in total, 10,414 documents were retrieved;
(2)
Screening for duplicates and unavailable studies after the initial retrieve yielded a total of 9467 studies;
(3)
After checking the titles, abstracts, and keywords in the literature and excluding studies that were not on the topic of the review or had low relevance to the topic of the study, in total, 3494 studies were obtained;
(4)
After reading the literature after the eligibility criteria had been applied, research covering at least one study related to KD was screened, resulting in the acquisition of 2955 studies.

2.4. Synthesis Report

We screened the retrieved literature through a hierarchy of inclusion and search criteria, resulting in the inclusion of 2955 studies. We performed visual analysis and extensively read key research and found that the included literature extensively involved various countries, institutions, and authors related to KD research, ensuring data fairness. The keywords used in the literature are highly relevant to KD, and highly cited studies related to KD from both databases were included to ensure the reliability of the data. We found through CiteSpaceV.6.2.R2 analysis that the stage of development and change in the keywords of KD research coincides with the stage of time distribution of statistics-based studies, which can assist in the exploration of the hot research trends for KD. All the cluster parameters indicate significant clustering, so the analysis of the KD clusters is reasonable. The analysis of co-citation references in the literature reveals key studies. The analysis of the main publishing trends in this field of research reveals that key countries, institutions, and authors have published a large amount of research and have established collaborative relationships in the field of KD. Keyword bursts with the strongest citation indicate future research directions.
We divided the studies into time distribution of the literature, hot research trends, pivotal research clusters, co-cited references, main publishing trends, future research based on the statistics of the number of studies, and CiteSpaceV.6.2.R2 analysis of various aspects of the literature. In Section 3.1, we quantitatively analyze the number of studies based on six months of bibliometrics; in Section 3.2, we elucidate and analyze hot research trends; in Section 3.3, we analyze the pivotal research clusters; in Section 3.4, we find key research; in Section 3.5, we explore the main publishing trends and relationship networks; and in Section 3.6, we analyze the keywords with the strongest citation burst over the last decade, revealing future directions.

2.5. Research Tools

In the CNKI database, the export format of the literature is refwork, which exports research containing information, including titles, institutions, keywords, and authors. In the WoS database, the export format is a plain text file, and the recorded content is full records and cited references. CiteSpaceV.6.2.R2 is a visualization analysis software developed based on the Java by Professor Chaomei Chen and her team from Drexel University in Philadelphia, PA, USA. CiteSpaceV.6.2.R2 is used to visualize and analyze the literature. CiteSpaceV.6.2.R2 can be used to explore changes in research trends and pivotal research clusters in the research field by analyzing keywords and clusters in the literature, identifying key research, and exploring the network of collaborative relationships between countries, institutions, and authors [63]. We chose CiteSpaceV.6.2.R2 to clarify the research stage and then reveal the research hotspots, co-cited studies, and main publishing trends to obtain the current development trend in research on KD. In graph mapping, the size of the node circle represents the frequency size, and the thickness of connecting lines between nodes represents the strength of the relationship between each node. “Node Types” indicates the type of literature analysis, including keywords, institutions, and authors; “Year Per Slice” represents the standard for analyzing the year and time of the research. In this study, CiteSpaceV.6.2.R2 analysis was conducted based on one year as the standard; “g-index” represents the criteria for inclusion and exclusion of nodes; and Modularity Q and Silhouette S are the basis for judging the effectiveness of graph mapping. In pivotal research clusters, S > 0.5 indicates reasonable clustering, S > 0.7 indicates convincing clustering, and Q > 0.3 indicates significant clustering.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Time Distribution of the Literature

From 1995 to 2005, there was a slow and steady increase in the number of publications with accumulation, especially before 2000, when the number was very small. From 2006 to 2015, there was a fast, fluctuating increase in the number of studies with development. From 2016 to 30 June 2023, there was a steady sharp increase in the number of studies with extension. In 2022, the number reached its peak, with a study volume of 216 (Figure 3). The increasing literature suggests that the field of KD research is burgeoning, and the literature will expand further in the future.
According to the international state of karst forest ecology and the national strategies and local needs of China, the Five-Year Plan for national economic and social development of the People’s Republic of China and the National Science and Technology Plans have led the research trend of KD (Figure 4). From 1995 to 2005, there was a period of accumulation during which the exploration and publication of research subjects on KD were slowly increasing. One special subject on stone mountains has been set up in the Topic Project of the Key Science and Technology Tackling Program in the National 9th Five-Year Plan of China. During this stage, researchers were influenced by the policy and began to explore the theory of KD, which laid the foundation for the subsequent scientific definition of KD and the development of KD control strategies [11,16,19,20]. The current scale of the literature began to manifest itself after 2000. Two karst desertification topics were first set up in the Major Project of the Key Science and Technology Tackling Program in the National 10th Five-Year Plan of China to explore the theory, influencing factors, and control methods of KD. On the basis of research and improvement of basic theories, researchers have published studies on the driving and genetic mechanisms of KD, the application of monitoring technology, and experimental demonstration [9,10,64,65]. These results have guided KD control in Southwest China, and the topic has achieved initial results.
The period from 2006 to 2015 was a development stage of key research subjects and rapid fluctuations in the number of publications on desertification. The Major Project of the Key Science and Technology Supporting Program in the National 11th Five-Year Plan set up three key topics with KD control as the core, and the Major Project of the Key Science and Technology Supporting Program in the National 12th Five-Year Plan set up two key topics for desertification control, continuously refining and innovating relevant theories and practices. A large number of representative studies containing a high clustering degree of keywords appeared around 2006, entering a development stage from then on. During this stage, due to the improvement of theories and interdisciplinary research, focusing on the study of eco-efficiency and carbon sinks, socio-economic impacts and human–land coupling research were explored, and eco-poor alleviation, eco-tourism, and eco-civilization construction were carried out [66,67,68,69].
From 2016 to 2023, the research and publication volume of the project’s full coverage steadily increased and entered the expansion stage. The Major Project of the Key Research and Development Program in the National 13th Five-Year Plan has set up four key projects for KD control. The increased volume has also been influenced by international cooperation and regional coordinated development, research on cross-regional synergistic mechanisms for KD prevention and control, and ecosystem service function and value assessment [47,51,70]. KD evolution, forest and vegetation restoration, and ecological and economic benefits have always been the core contents for each stage.

3.2. Hot Research Trends

Based on the CNKI database, there are 431 nodes and 707 connections in the visualization graph (Figure 5). Based on the WoS database, there are 475 nodes and 2868 connections in the visualization graph (Figure 6). In CiteSpaceV.6.2.R2, “Node Types” is set to “Keyword”, “Year Per Slice” is set to “1”, and “Selection Criteria” is set to “g-index = 25”.
Time zone visualization of hot keywords shows the KD research trends. In the accumulation stage (1995–2005), high-frequency and high-burst keywords included rock desertification (742), karst rocky desertification (489), soil erosion (114), karst areas (75), guizhou province (68), remote sensing (63), karst mountain region (35), southwest China (32), soil and water conservation (22), and ecological control (21). In the development stage (2006–2015), high-frequency and high-burst keywords included soil erosion (60), impact (55), land use (42), forest (39), models (36), benefit evaluation (27), comprehensive control (24), comprehensive treatment (19), human intervention (16), and huajiang (14). In the expansion stage (2016–2023), high-frequency and high-burst keywords included organic carbon (21), ecosystem services (14), ecological industry (13), poverty alleviation (12), agricultural products (11), karst ecosystem (10), green program (9), county demonstration (9), rural revitalization (8), and carbon sequestration (7).
In the accumulation stage (1995–2005), “rock desertification”, “rocky desertification”, and “karst rocky desertification” are the most frequent keywords, indicating that KD is a research focus in relation to the karst ecological environment [71,72]. The words “karst areas”, “karst mountain region”, “guizhou province”, and “southwest China” indicate that research, control, and monitoring of KD have been carried out in the karst areas of Southwest China. The initial ecological and economic benefits were achieved in this stage [73,74,75,76]. The words “dynamic monitoring”, “distribution characteristics”, “gis”, and “remote sensing” provide data support for establishing a grading and evaluation system for KD. Remote sensing and GIS have become the best choices for desertification monitoring [8,20,42,64,77,78] and provide detailed data for evaluation, especially for forest restoration [79]. Unmanned aerial vehicles equipped with remote sensing technology have become a research focus for the precise monitoring of forest vegetation structure, helping to better manage and protect forests in controlled areas [80,81,82]. The words “carbonate rock”, “karst forest”, and “soil” are important natural factors for identifying KD and its causes, as well as prerequisites for the control work [39,83,84,85,86,87,88]. The words “deforestation for arable land”, “soil erosion”, “soil and water conservation”, “ecological control”, and “ecological mode” have shown an implementation of control models and experimental demonstrations centered on forest vegetation restoration, and soil and water conservation [21,25,89,90,91,92,93]. “Artificial forests”, “artificial vegetation”, and “agroforestry” have made important contributions to carbon fixation and oxygen release, water and soil conservation, nutrient cycling, and coordinating forest vegetation community restoration with agricultural activities [49,94,95]. The trend of hot research indicates that Guizhou is a core area of KD research. The scientific definition, grading and control technology, and experimental demonstration of KD have laid the foundation for rapid development in the future.
In the development stage (2006–2015), the words “soil animals”, “soil thickness”, “soil moisture”, “soil erosion”, and “forest and plant” reveal the spatial distribution and changes in soil physicochemical and biological characteristics, which help to select vegetation for evaluation of the control and effects [29,41,65,96,97,98,99,100]. Forest vegetation transformation affects soil biology, soil physicochemical properties, and soil ecosystem services. The evaluation of the change in soil ecosystem services caused by the transformation is helpful in evaluating an ecological effect caused by forest degradation or restoration [50,101]. The words “population density”, “human intervention”, “human activities”, “land use”, and “afforestation model” have become the key factors for humans to reasonably develop and utilize resources and solve KD problems in terms of control [67,102,103,104,105,106,107]. The restoration effect of forest vegetation directly affects the ecological environment in the affected areas [88,108,109]. The words “alternative livelihoods”, “crops”, “benefit evaluation”, “rural poverty”, and “alleviate poverty through development” indicate that agricultural production is affected by KD, exacerbating rural poverty. As a result, an ecological industry poverty alleviation model for KD control should be established [49,66,110,111,112,113]. Characteristic forestry and agroforestry models improve land productivity, preserve soil and water, and greatly improve economic and ecological effects [44,114,115]. The words “comprehensive control”, “comprehensive treatment”, “forest vegetation restoration”, and “models” reflect the implementation of integrated control of KD in accordance with local conditions. Scientific models with scale demonstrations include the terms “Bijie”, “Qingzhen”, “Huajiang”, “Huanjiang”, and “Pingguo”, which have become the keywords [23,56,68,116,117,118,119,120]. As a result, universal eco-industry engineering models for KD control have been proposed by extending, applying, and expanding the scientific models in the future [121]. In the development stage, although high-frequency words do not account for much of the literature, the number of keywords is the highest. The trend of hot research indicates that research is constantly deepening and being refined. The driving factors and evolutionary mechanisms are one of the hotspots at this stage, indicating that many comprehensive management studies and scale demonstrations have been carried out in the desertification areas. The dynamic monitoring of soil physical, chemical, and biological characteristics provides important data and a theoretical basis for the control of KD. Control technology has gradually developed from mountain closure for afforestation to forest vegetation ecological restoration.
In the expansion stage (2016–2023), the words “forest ecosystem”, “agricultural products”, “ecological industry”, and “ecological products” are the main trends in the control of KD, with a focus on breaking through the formation mechanism and process of derived ecological industries [27,45,52,122,123,124]. Collaborative development of forest ecosystem services and ecological industries is conducive to balancing ecological remediation and economic development [125,126,127,128]. It has become one of the highlights and hot spots of KD control and the ecological industry for discussion in terms of the words “afforestation effect”, “ecosystem services”, and “eco-products realization” at this stage [59,129,130,131,132,133,134]. The key lies in optimizing the forest ecosystem service function, enhancing the supply capacity of ecological products, and improving the forest ecological compensation mechanism [25,94,135,136]. Hence, the keywords “sustainable livelihood”, “poverty alleviation”, “rural revitalization”, and “county demonstration” have become a research focus in this stage, in contrast to the former stage [47,128,137,138,139,140]. The focus is on exploring the development and utilization methods of characteristic forestry and agroforestry, as well as balancing public welfare and profit attributes of ecological forests [44,95,114]. As China is becoming a moderately prosperous society in all respects, the eco-industry of KD control has become a future research trend in promoting rural revitalization. The high-frequency words “organic carbon”, “carbon sequestration”, and “low-carbon community” reveal the importance of low-carbon community construction, which promotes the construction of low-carbon communities in rural areas by achieving a low-carbon eco-environment, low-carbon productivity activities, and a low-carbon energy consumption structure [43,141,142,143,144,145,146]. Restoring arable land to forests effectively improves forest carbon sink function and carbon storage [147,148,149]. In the expansion stage, the focus is on the ecological secondary industries and poverty alleviation, with a greater emphasis on the application of new theories and high-tech methods, and the response to policies, with more environmental factors being considered in ecological restoration and more attention being paid to the control theory and application of ecosystem function and ecological services at the county level. Greater emphasis is placed on vegetation restoration for integrated ecological protection and the restoration of mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, lakes, grasslands, and desertification. Eco-products focus on supply capacity improvement through qualitative and quantitative optimization of ecosystem functions.

3.3. Pivotal Research Clusters

Based on CNKI, the clustering theme display is set to 0–11, and the results are S = 0.8971 and Q = 0.6184 (Figure 7). Based on WoS, the clustering theme display is set to 0–9, and the results are S = 0.7212 and Q = 0.3964 (Figure 8).
The pivotal research clusters on KD are mainly discussed in terms of three aspects: study area and method, driving and genetic mechanisms, and control technology and model. The research sector comprises the following: forestry and ecology account for 33%, soil/water conservation and agroforestry for 19%, grassland and animal husbandry for 16%, land and natural resources for 15%, and others for 17%.
The research clusters related to the study area and method includes “karst area”, “rocky desertification area”, “Guizhou province”, and “remote sensing”. By analyzing high-frequency keywords behind the themes in the literature, we found that South China karst is diverse and typical, and Guizhou is the largest and most representative area with the most serious and prominent karst desertification problems, and the research on this has been centralized [40,150,151]. The spatial distribution and temporal variability of KD are pivotal research clusters [152,153,154]. The proportion of areas with varying degrees of desertification can be calculated, the evolution history can be analyzed [155,156], and the development trend can be monitored and evaluated in detail using remote sensing and GIS technologies to draw maps under complex karst conditions [157,158]. Moreover, the technology is very helpful for measuring complex forest structures, obtaining high spatial resolution in forest modeling, and monitoring forest change trends in desertification areas [80,81]. Research clusters indicate that Southwest China is the hardest-hit area of KD, but it is also the core area of KD research. KD research and control strategies originating from this region are useful for KD control in northern China as well as KD areas around the world.
The research clusters on driving and genetic mechanisms are “driving factors”, “deforestation for arable land”, “soil erosion”, “land use”, and “climate change”. The analysis of highly cited studies reveals that KD has destroyed the forest ecosystem, and soil erosion caused by human reclamation destroying forest vegetation is an important factor in the intensification of desertification [159]. Location detection of soil erosion with the level of rocky desertification is helpful for developing appropriate control measures [160]. Land use type is one of the factors that leads to different rates of rocky desertification [70]. Shrubs, other forests, low-coverage grasslands, steep-slope drylands, and unused land account for a large proportion of KD land [161]. Land use sustainability measures can effectively evaluate desertification control, reveal the desertification sensitivity to human activities under different land use types, predict an area of each sensitive type, and explore the desertification risk [162]. Water and soil loss is an important manifestation of the effect of human–land conflicts and global climate change [163]. Research clusters indicate high population pressure in the karst areas, large occupation of arable land by construction land, predatory development of natural resources, and disharmony of industrial structures with agriculture, forestry, and animal husbandry, forming a human–land system with regional advantages and socio-economic contrasts. Research clusters also reveal a reverse succession process of deforestation for arable land, soil erosion, bedrock exposure, and KD caused by unreasonable human activities in the fragile karst ecological environment.
The research clusters on control technology and model include “forest ecosystems”, “grasslands”, “agroforestry”, “soil organic carbon”, “drought stress”, and “karst water”. Forest ecosystems in karst areas face problems of KD, and forest restoration measures need to develop management programs based on different sensitivity levels [164]. Soil organic carbon and soil metabolic entropy play important roles in artificial vegetation in forest ecological restoration [69,146,165]. Forest vegetation restoration can increase soil stability and soil organic matter content [166]. Grassland is the last barrier to protect forest eco-environments in karst areas and plays an essential role in KD control [167]. Agroforestry provides ecological restoration and economic benefits, promotes the integration of eco-industry and ecosystem services, and forms a perfect model of ecological industry for rural development [45,168]. Drought-resistant tree species suitable for desertification habitats are selected to address periodic drought environments faced by vegetation based on knowledge of water consumption regularity and the drought resistance capabilities of afforestation tree species [169]. Forest ecological management is very helpful for solving a contradiction between karst water sustainable production and water use [170], for proposing efficient utilization and allocation of surface/groundwater resources and the optimization of natural plant communities and forest–shrub–grass allocation [48], and for establishing three-dimensional development models of ecological industries in syncline and anticline valleys for efficient utilization of water and soil resources, stable forest ecosystems and suitable characteristic forest ecological industries, and the development of economic tree species industries in forest ecological restoration [171]. Research clusters indicate that for this complex human–land system, technologies, such as forest and vegetation restoration and comprehensive control, are proposed to address the formation of artificial afforestation, mountain closure for afforestation and grass cultivation, artificial grass planting, grassland improvement, soil and water conservation, water resource development, rural energy optimization, ecological migration, and tourism resource development during the control process. Scientific and three-dimensional control approaches have been adopted in the fragile ecological environment, and ecological industry protection and restoration and precision poverty alleviation demonstrations have been carried out, basically achieving a coordinated development of ecology, economy, and society. The models of Bijie, Qingzhen, Huajiang, Shibing, Libo, Huanjiang, and Pingguo have been constructed and have had a nationwide influence. Forest ecological restoration work has made an important contribution to enhancing forest ecosystem stability and improving ecological function and services in the demonstration areas.

3.4. Literature Co-Citations

Based on the CNKI database, Kangning Xiong, in the project “Research on Karst Desertification and Survey by Remote Sensing in Guizhou” funded by the Guizhou Provincial Department of Water Resources in 2000, systematically studied and proposed the definition, environmental effects and ecological poverty, control models, and technical measures of KD for the first time. Afterward, he led his team to publish the first monograph on KD research, a “Study on the karst desertification based on remote sensing and GIS”, with the Geological Press of China [9]. It has been widely recognized in the field. It has become the most frequently cited Chinese study in the field (1053 times), laying the foundation for KD research and control [104,115,172,173,174,175].
In CiteSpaceV.6.2.R2, “Node Types” is set to “Reference”, “Year Per Slice” is set to “1”, and “Selection Criteria” is set to “g-index = 25” (Figure 9). Through visualization of the co-citations in the literature, the most highly cited study is “Rocky desertification in Southwest China: Impacts, causes, and restoration” by Zhongcheng Jiang et al. (608 times), revealing that the karst rocky desertification has had significant negative impacts on the environment and socio-economic conditions at local and regional scales [176]. The study with the highest centrality is “Spatio-temporal evolution of rocky desertification and its driving forces in karst areas of Northwestern Guangxi, China” by Kelin Wang et al. (centrality 0.18), which points out that the driving forces behind rocky desertification have been increasingly influenced by human activities [177]. The work with the highest half-life is “How types of carbonate rock assemblages constrain the distribution of karst rocky desertified land in Guizhou Province, PR China: phenomena and mechanisms” by Shijie Wang et al. (half-life 4.5), which examines the spatial distribution of karst rocky desertified land and relates it to the different assemblages of basement carbonate rocks [178]. The work with the highest keyword burst is Jiang et al. (burst 20.73) mentioned above [176].
Studies with high citation frequency, centrality, half-life, and keyword burst reflect the strong academic influence, highlighting the hot issues of KD research trends at the time of publication and showcasing the key research stages. Synthesizing CNKI and WoS, before 2002, KD research comprised a discussion of basic theories, until Kangning Xiong’s team published the first monograph on KD, which defined the concept of KD and classified it while revealing the driving and genetic mechanisms [9]. Since then, from 2002 to 2014, a large number of highly co-cited and highly central studies have appeared, a large number of them focused on key subjects related to the concept of KD, drivers, the human–land relationship, GIS technology, and control models [10,124,172,176,177,178]. Research on the impact of natural and human factors on KD is highly popular, which forges an important research direction for KD. The period 2004–2009 for the literature on the high half-life indicates that the transition between the accumulation stage and the development stage is a key period for research on land use and the human–land relationship. The high-burst literature indicates a rapid increase in citation frequency around 2014, which has a certain representative effect on the pivotal research subjects in the development stage. The literature is beginning to focus on ecosystem services, forest succession, ecological restoration, climate change, carbon sinks, comprehensive control, poverty alleviation, and economic benefits [24,103,129,150]. Most of the literature on desertification is published in Chinese journals, with relatively few published in journals with high impact factors, such as “Nature” and “Science”. As a result, global cooperation in KD research should be strengthened, and studies should be published in highly influential international academic journals for studies of dynamic changes and forest ecological control of KD from a global perspective.

3.5. Main Publishing Trends

Visualization analysis was conducted on the studies in the WoS database, and the retrieved works came from 50 countries (Figure 10). The results show that China has an absolute advantage in the number of articles published, ranking first in the world, with 634 articles and 1.25 centrality. The second is the US, with a publication volume of 40 articles and a centrality of 0.04. The UK ranks third, with 14 articles and a centrality of 0.06. The others are Canada, Japan, Denmark, The Netherlands, Spain, Germany, etc. China has cooperative relationships with the US, the UK, Canada, and Germany in the study of KD. The US has cooperative relationships with Spain, France, and The Netherlands; the UK has cooperative relationships with Australia and Japan. The main countries of publication have KD distribution. Except for China, most countries and regions mainly study the interrelationships between rocky desertification and hydrology, ecology, and soil due to their mild degrees of desertification, low population density, and low human intervention [205,206,207].
Based on the CNKI and WoS databases (Table 2), Guizhou Normal University, including the State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, the School of Karst Science, and the School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, ranks first with 751 papers. Guizhou University ranks second with 209 papers. The Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CAGS), including the Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR and GZAR, and the Key Laboratory of Karst Ecosystem and Treatment of Rocky Desertification of the Ministry of Natural Resources, ranks third with 208 papers. Institutions outside China, for instance, the University of Copenhagen and the University of Exeter, are major contributors.
The top three authors in terms of publication volume were Kangning Xiong (257 articles, with an average centrality of 0.13), Shijie Wang (107 articles, with an average centrality of 0.07), and Yangbing Li (55 articles, with an average centrality of 0.01) (Table 3). In addition, Rasmus Fensholt at the University of Copenhagen and Jeroen Meersmans, Sophie M. Green, and Timothy A. Quine at the University of Exeter are important scholars in the study of KD.
The main academic teams (Figure 11 and Figure 12) include Kangning Xiong, Ziqi Liu, and Yongkuan Chi, who study the classification and grading of the karst desertification by remote sensing and GIS, the relationship between humans and land, the mechanism of formation, forest ecological industry and poverty alleviation, and the control models and technologies [9,45,65,68,162]. The author group that includes Shijie Wang, Xiaoyong Bai, and Zhenming Zhang, among others, is studying the driving mechanism and evolution process of KD, as well as its relationship with landforms, lithology, precipitation, and population [208,209]. The author group that includes Kelin Wang, Yuemin Yue, and Chunhua Zhang is studying karst landscape patterns and dynamic changes in KD, forest ecosystems, and service functions [33,127,189,191].
The global situation of KD research forms a China-centered research network. Southwest China research institutions and authors also occupy a dominant position and work closely together in terms of publication volume. KD issues are arising, to varying degrees, in the karst regions of the world. Throughout the world, there are KD landscapes experiencing degradation of their fragile environment in addition to those in China [102,170,210,211]. Scholars outside of China, such as M. Parise, U. Sauro, and D. Tuyet, among others, have studied the KD landscape that is driven by human activities [102,210,211], and R. Fensholt and J. Meersmans, among others, collaborated with Chinese scholars to study interrelationships between KD, on the one hand, and vegetation and soil, on the other [79,160]. However, the vast majority of institutions and authors studying KD are from China, and there is a scarcity of literature from other countries. This shows that other countries do not attach importance to KD research and that international cooperation on KD research is not close. In areas with insufficient literature representation, there is also a problem with KD, which requires international cooperation to attract regional attention. The implementation plan for KD control proposed by South China should not only strengthen cooperation and exchange among author groups but also expand to international and domestic cooperation with North China, Mediterranean coastal countries, the US, Russia, Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia with a larger karst distribution, especially Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Myanmar, and the rest of the Indochina Peninsula in the karst regions, which belong to the southern extension of South China karst, which has common ecological environment attributes and urgently require desertification research and control.

3.6. Future Research

The identification of cutting-edge research can provide researchers with the latest research trends and predict the future development direction of the research field. Identifying cutting-edge research typically involves analyzing changes in the frequency of keyword appearances in a study [212]. The stronger the keyword burst, the more attention it has received in the field in that particular time period. “Afforestation technology”, “afforestation”, “plant diversity”, “net primary production”, “green programs”, “conservation”, and “afforestation effects” show that forest vegetation conservation and restoration and high-quality green development are the latest research hotspots. “Ecosystem services”, “ecological products”, “governance models”, “karst ecosystems”, “ecological industry”, and “ecological restoration projects” show that ecosystem service function optimization, ecological product value realization, and ecological industry are the latest research hotspots. “Comprehensive evaluation”, “index systems”, “benefits analysis”, and “estimating ecological indicators” show that the evaluation of karst forest ecosystem function, the evaluation of the benefits of KD control, and measuring the value of ecological products are the latest research hotspots. “Human intervention”, “big data”, “soil organic carbon”, “ecological stoichiometry”, “influencing factors”, and “driving factors” show that big data application and ecosystem function driving ecological product supply capacity–ecological product–ecological industry development–rural revitalization chain mechanisms are the latest research hotspots (Table 4).
The keyword bursts with the strongest citations indicate a higher level of research interest in the research field, and they suggest future research directions. With the 14th Five-Year Plan of China, the government put forward a more demanding strategy, which promotes the integrated control of KD, requiring research on KD to provide scientific and technological support for the transformation of South China karst to high-quality green development. That is, according to a series of related scientific issues and technological needs for forest ecosystem function optimization, ecological product supply capacity enhancement, ecological product value realization, ecological industry formation, and human wellbeing improvement based on rural revitalization in KD control, researchers should conduct full-chain design, integrated arrangement, and modular promotion for systematic research that focuses on basic frontier research, common key technology development, technological application and demonstration, and industrialization extension. The first goal is, based on forest ecosystem functional traits and health evaluation, to clarify the improvement mechanisms of system resilience from vulnerability regulation, system stability from structural adjustment, system safety capacity from carrying capacity regulation, and eco-product supply capacity from ecological asset revitalization. The second goal is to reveal the driving mechanisms of the ecosystem function optimization for service balance/synergy and ecosystem services (i.e., eco-product value realization of ecological material products, regulatory services, and cultural services) in terms of ecological industry development and, hence, the ecological industry’s effect on rural revitalization. The last goal is to propose an ecosystem service rural revitalization model with strategies and paths of the eco-product value realization to conduct application demonstration and verification extension, which will provide a scientific basis and technological support for consolidating poverty alleviation achievements and promoting rural revitalization in KD control areas.

3.7. Limitations

This section notes some key points regarding the limitations of this paper. Firstly, the studies retrieved for this review only cover the period from 1 January 1995 to 30 June 2023, and ignore the latest and older literature. We only searched the CNKI and WoS databases, and there are studies in other databases that we did not retrieve. We have removed unavailable literature, newspapers, patents, and technical reports, as these may lead to incomplete and one-sided research. Secondly, other researchers have also reviewed the literature on KD [213,214] but have used fewer search terms. We have tried our best to include the various synonymous terms for KD as search terms in our search, and we have obtained more studies. However, due to the complexity and limitations of literature database search engines and search methods, our search of the literature related to KD is incomplete. In terms of research in general, it has little impact on the KD research trend and the exploration of pivotal research clusters. Finally, this study is based on our summary and analysis of statistical and visual mapping, which, while trying to remain objective, is still subjective.

4. Conclusions

This paper is based on CNKI and WoS retrieval and screening, which ultimately resulted in 2955 studies being included in our review. The following conclusions are drawn based on the systematic review approach and visual analysis. (1) The research is divided into three phases in terms of the number of studies with a slow and steady increase and accumulation with a thematic exploration of sub-projects, fast fluctuating increases, and development with a project in a key field, and a steady and sharp increase and extension with full coverage of the program. (2) The hot research trend shows that in the accumulation stage, hot research is on scientific definition, classification, and grading, as well as control technology and model demonstration; in the development stage, hot research is on driving factors and evolutionary mechanisms, comprehensive control research, and scale demonstrations; and in the expansion stage, hot research is on ecological industries and poverty alleviation, ecological protection and vegetation restoration, and ecological product supply capacity enhancement. (3) The pivotal research clusters are study area and method, driving and genetic mechanisms, and control technology and model. (4) The high citation frequency, centrality, half-life, and burst literature are all from China and belong to institutions and authors with more research on KD. (5) China is the most influential country in the world in terms of KD research, and Southwest Chinese institutions and authors have the highest number of studies and lead the global trend. (6) Ecosystem function optimization, the improvement of ecological product supply capacity, ecological product value realization, the formation of the ecological industry, the driving mechanism of the ecological industry on rural revitalization, and the ecosystem service rural revitalization model are the hot future research directions.
There is a problem of KD distribution to varying degrees across karst areas around the world, and the literature on KD in countries outside of China shows that there is a lack of research on the driving mechanisms of local desertification formation and KD control in these countries. KD research should strengthen international exchange and cooperation, which can promote innovation and the exchange of technologies and models for KD control and ecological restoration and promote comprehensive control projects in countries that urgently need KD control. Natural disasters, poverty, food issues, and ecological security caused by KD affect the sustainable development of many countries around the world. Research on KD should strengthen interdisciplinary studies, such as humanities and social sciences, climate and meteorology, and ecology and environmental science; expand disciplinary boundaries and perspectives; and contribute to the design of comprehensive KD control plans.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z.; methodology, M.Z., Y.Z. and Z.Z.; software, Y.Z. and Z.Z.; validation, Y.Z., Z.Z. and Z.Y.; formal analysis, Z.Y.; investigation, Z.Y.; resources, Z.Y. and Z.Z.; data curation, Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z., Z.Z. and Z.Y.; visualization, Y.Z., Z.Z. and Z.Y.; supervision, M.Z.; project administration, Y.Z.; funding acquisition, M.Z. and Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science Research Project of the Hebei Education Department (No. QN2021412), the Scientific Foundation of Tangshan Normal University (No. 2021A07), the Key Core Technology Research Project for Mountainous Agriculture in Guizhou (GZNYGJHX-2023011), and the Oversea Expertise Introduction Program for Discipline Innovation of China (No. D17016).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in [China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)] at [https://www.cnki.net, accessed on 15 October 2023], and [Web of Science (WOS)] at [https://www.webofscience.com, accessed on 15 October 2023].

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the editors for their contributions to this paper and the anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments, which enriched the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, M. On the Fragility of Karst Environment. Yunnan Geogr. Environ. Res. 1990, 2, 21–29. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Lu, Y. Karst in China: A World of Distinctive Peaks and Various Caves; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2012. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. Ford, D.; Williams, P. Karst Hydrogeology and Geomorphology; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2007; 8p, ISBN 9781118684986. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sweeting, M.M. Limestone Landscapes of South China. Geol. Today 1986, 2, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yuan, D. Karst in Southwest China and Its Comparison with Karst in North China. Quat. Sci. 1992, 12, 352–361. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Lu, Y. Models of Karst Geomorphological Evolutions in China. Geogr. Res. 1986, 5, 25–35. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. Sweeting, M.M. Cone and Tower Karst of South China. Geogr. Rev. 1989, 3, 2–6. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lan, A.; Xiong, K. RS-GIS Analysis of Current Situation and Spatial Variation of Karst Rocky Desertification. Areal Res. Dev. 2001, 20, 39–41. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Xiong, K.; Li, P.; Zhou, Z.; An, Y.; Lv, T.; Lan, A.; Liu, R.; Mei, Z.; Yang, X.; Hu, J.; et al. Study on Rocky Desertification Based on Remote Sensing and GIS; Geological Press: Beijing China, 2002; ISBN 7-116-03676-8. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, S. Concept Deduction and Its Connotation of Karst Rocky Desertification. Carsologica Sin. 2002, 21, 31–35. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Yuan, D. On the Environment and Geologic Problem of Karst Mountains and Rocks in the South–West China. World Sci.-Technol. R D 1997, 19, 41–43. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Xiong, K. Karst Landscape and Environmental Conservation in New Zealand. J. Guizhou Norm. Univ. Nat. Sci. 1990, 13, 16–25. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, J. Soil and Water Loss and Its Treatment in Subtropical Karst areas. Soil Water Conserv. China 1984, 7, 7–10, 64. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Cai, G. AGRO-Ecological Environment in Karst Mountainous areas of South China. Carsologica Sin. 1988, 7, 3–10. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Huang, H. To carry out the Research of Comprehensive Management and Resource Exploitation and Utilization in Shishan area of South China. Carsologica Sin. 1989, 8, 32–41. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Yang, M. Geomorphological Zoning for Agricuture of Gzhou; Guizhou People’s Publishing House: Guizhou, China, 1996; ISBN 7221006490. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Li, J. Environmental Analysis on the Land-use of Wujiang River Basin. Guizhou Sci. 1992, 10, 66–70. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. Zeng, Z. Idea on Poverty Alleviation for the Rocky Mountain in South China. In Human Activity and Karst Environment—The 4th National Karst Conference Symposium; Beijing Science & Technology Press: Beijing, China, 1994; pp. 33–39. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Su, W.; Zhou, J. Rocky Desertification in Guizhou Karst Region and Its Preventive Strategy. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Val. 1995, 4, 177–182. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Yuan, D. Rock Desertification in the Subtropical Karst of South China. Z. Geomorph. N. F. 1997, 108, 81–90. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Xiong, K. Ecological Reconstruction of Karst Rocky Desertification and Its Significance in Huajiang Gorge. Chin. J. Popul. Resour. Environ. 2005, 15, 138–142. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Xiao, H.; Xiong, K. Spatial Optimization Allocation for Comprehensive Control Technology in Catchment: With a Special Reference to Bijie Salaxi Rocky Desertiffication Control Demonstration Area. Chin. J. Popul. Resour. Environ. 2016, 26, 236–239. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. Zou, X.; Du, F.; Xiong, K. Study on Eco-agriculture System with Community Tourist System in Karst Rock Desertification area-A case in Yangchangdong, Qingzhen. Carsologica Sin. 2009, 28, 406–412. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  24. Xiong, K.; Deng, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Kong, L. Forest Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs/Synergies and System Function Optimization in Karst Desertification Control. Plants 2023, 12, 2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fang, J.; Xiong, K.; Chi, Y.; Song, S.; He, C.; He, S. Research Advancement in Grassland Ecosystem Vulnerability and Ecological Resilience and Its Inspiration for Improving Grassland Ecosystem Services in the Karst Desertification Control. Plants 2022, 11, 1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, Z.; Xiong, K.; Chang, H.; Zhang, W.; Huang, D. A review of Eco-product Value Realization and Ecological Civilization and its Enlightenment to Karst Protected areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Song, S.; Xiong, K.; Chi, Y.; Shen, X.; Guo, T.; Lu, N. Research Progress and Prospect of Grassland Establishment and Ecological Animal Husbandry in the Karst Rocky Desertification area. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2018, 27, 7017–7030. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jiang, Z.; Yuan, D. Dynamics Features of the Epikarst Zone and Their Significance in Environments and Resources. Acta Geosci. Sin. 1999, 3, 302–308. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  29. Jiang, Z.; Cao, J.; Yang, D.; Luo, W. Current Status and Comprehensive Countermeasures of Soil Erosion for Karst Rocky Desertification Areas in the Southwestern China. Sci. Soil Water Conserv. 2008, 6, 37–42. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  30. Jiang, Z.; Yuan, D.; Cao, J.; Tan, X.; He, S.; Zhang, C. A Study of Carbon Sink Capacity of Karst Processes in China. Acta Geosci. Sin. 2012, 33, 129–134. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang, C.; Jiang, Z.; Groves, C.; Yuan, D. 30 Years International Cooperation with IGCP and Perspectives of Karst Critical Zone Research. Carsologica Sin. 2019, 38, 301–306. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  32. Jiang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Luo, W.; Xiao, Q.; Wu, Z. Research Progress and Prospect of Carbon Sink in Karst Region of China. Carsologica Sin. 2022, 41, 345–355. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang, K.; Su, Y.; Zeng, F.; Chen, H.; Xiao, R. Ecological Process and Vegetation Restoration in Karst Region of Southwest China. Res. Agric. Mod. 2008, 29, 641–645. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  34. Yue, Y.; Zhang, B.; Wang, K.; Liu, B.; Li, R.; Jiao, Q.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, M. Spectral Indices for Estimating Ecological Indicators of Karst Rocky Desertification. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2010, 31, 2115–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, M.; Wang, K.; Zhang, C.; Chen, H.; Liu, H.; Yue, Y.; Luffman, I.; Qi, X. Using the Radial basis Function Network Model to Assess Rocky Desertification in Northwest Guangxi, China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2011, 62, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, M.; Wang, K.; Liu, H.; Zhang, C. Responses of Spatial-temporal Variation of Karst Ecosystem Service Values to Landscape Pattern in Northwest of Guangxi, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2011, 21, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, K.; Yue, Y.; Chen, H.; Zeng, F. Mechanisms and Realization Pathways for Intergration of Scientific Poverty Alleviation and Ecosystem Services Enhancement. J. Chin. Acad. Sci. 2020, 35, 1264–1272. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, K.; Zhang, C.; Chen, H.; Yue, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, M.; Fu, Z. Karst landscapes of China: Patterns, ecosystem processes and services. Landsc. Ecol. 2019, 34, 2743–2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, Y.; Xiong, K.; Yu, Y.; Yang, S.; Liu, H. Stoichiometric Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Plants in Karst Areas of Rocky Desertification of Southern China. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2020, 18, 1961–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bai, X.; Wang, S.; Xiong, K. Assessing Spatial-temporal Evolution Processes of Karst Rocky Desertification Land: Indications for Restoration Strategies. Land Degrad. Dev. 2013, 24, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lv, M.; Wang, H.; Cai, Y. Review of Soil Erosion in Karst area of Southwest China. Prog. Geogr. 2007, 26, 87–96. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wu, H.; Chen, S.; Li, J.; Ruan, G. Remote Sensing Dynamic Measurement of Rocky Desertification and Quantitative Evaluation based on T-GIS. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of Chinese Geophysical Society, Beihai, China, 1 October 2002. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  43. Shen, J.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, R.; Wang, Z. Ecological Restoration of Eroded Karst Utilizing Pioneer Moss and Vascular Plant Species with Selection based on Vegetation Diversity and Underlying soil Chemistry. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2019, 20, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, Q.; Liang, H.; Xiong, K.; Li, R. Eco-benefits Coupling of Agroforestry and Soil and Water Conservation under KRD Environment: Frontier Theories and Outlook. Agroforest Syst. 2019, 93, 1927–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xiong, K.; Zhu, D.; Peng, T.; Yu, L.; Xue, J.; Li, P. Study on Ecological Industry Technology and Demonstration for Karst Rocky Desertification Control of the Karst Plateau-Gorge. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2016, 36, 7109–7113. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  46. Wu, K.; Jiang, Z.; Luo, W.; Tan, X. Effect of Tri-dimensional Eco-agriculture Pattern in Karst Peak-cluster Zones-A case Study of Guohua Demonstration area in Pingguo County, Guangxi Zhuang Autonmous Region. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 2008, 16, 1197–1200. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, Q.; Xing, K.; Dan, W.; Niu, L. Collaborative Mechanism and Model of Ecological Industry and Targeted Poverty Alleviation in Karst Rocky Desertification Control. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2021, 41, 2968–2982. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  48. Cao, J.; Deng, Y.; Yang, H.; Pu, J.; Zhu, T.; Lan, F.; Huang, F.; Li, J. Rocky Desertification Evolution, Treatment Technology and Demonstration in Karst Faulted Basins, Southwest Chaina. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2016, 36, 7103–7108. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  49. Xiong, K.; Liu, L.; Luo, Y. The Evaluation Studies Progress and Prospects of Sustainable Development in Rocky Desertification Region. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 253, 44–49. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  50. Sun, Q.; Ruan, Y.; Chen, P.; Wang, S.; Liu, X.; Lian, B. Effects of Mineral-organic Fertilizer on the Biomass of Green Chinese Cabbage and Potential Carbon Sequestration Ability in Karst Areas of Southwest China. Acta Geochim. 2019, 38, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wan, P.; Xiong, K.; Zhang, L. Heterogeneity of Spatial-Temporal Distribution of Nitrogen in the Karst Rocky Desertification Soils and Its Implications for Ecosystem Service Support of the Desertification Control-A Literature Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhou, J.; Xiong, K.; Wang, Q.; Tang, J.; Lin, L. A Review of Ecological Assets and Ecological Products Supply: Implications for the Karst Rocky Desertification Control. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, S.; Li, Y. Problem and Development Trends about Researches on Karst Rocky Desertification. Adv. Earth Sci. 2007, 6, 573–582. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  54. Huang, Q.; Cai, Y.; Wang, C. Progress of Research on Rocky Desertification in Karst Areas of Southwest China. J. Nat. Disasters 2007, 2, 106–111. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  55. Song, L.; Wang, K.; Yan, X. Characteristics of Soil Fauna Communities in the Karst Region, Southwest China, based on Meta-analysis. J. Ecol. 2018, 38, 984–990. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  56. Xue, J.; Zhou, Z.; Wu, Y. Research Progresses on Ecological Are Mediation of the Degraded Soil in Karst Rocky Desertification mountation areas. J. Nanjing For. Univ. 2022, 46, 135–145. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  57. Khan, K.; Kunz, R.; Kleijnen, J.; Antes, G. Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review. J. R. Soc. Med. 2003, 96, 118–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Page, M.; McKenzie, J.; Bossuyt, P.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.; Mulrow, C.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.; Akl, E.; Brennan, S.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2021, 74, 790–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Xiao, J.; Xiong, K. A Review of Agroforestry Ecosystem Services and Its Enlightenment on the Ecosystem Improvement of Rocky Desertification Control. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 856, 158538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Pullin, A.; Stewart, G. Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20, 1647–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mertz, M.; Kahrass, H.; Strech, D. Current State of Ethics Literature Synthesis: A Systematic Review of Reviews. BMC Med. 2016, 14, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kitchenham, B.; Brereton, P.; Budgen, D.; Turner, M.; Bailey, J.; Linkman, S. Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering—A Systematic Literature Review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2001, 51, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, Y.; Chen, C.; Liu, Z.; Hu, Z.; Wang, X. The Methodology Function of Cite Space Mapping Knowledge Domains. Stud. Sci. Sci. 2015, 33, 242–253. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhou, Z. Application of Remote Sensing and GIS Technology in the Study of Rocky Desertification in Karst area of Guizhou Province. Bull. Soil Water Conserv. 2001, 21, 52–54, 66. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  65. Xiong, K.; Li, J.; Long, M. Features of Soil and Water loss and Key Issues in Demonstration areas for Combating Kasrt Rocky Desertification. Geogr. J. 2012, 67, 878–888. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  66. Luo, Y.; Xiong, K.; Chen, Q.; Long, C.; Gu, Z.; Wei, P. Evaluation on Development Sustainability of Ecological Management District of Karst areas. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2010, 19, 809–814. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  67. Xiong, K.; Bai, L.; Peng, X.; Li, Y. Research on Changes of Land-use in Different Scale in Karst Mountain. Carsologica Sin. 2005, 24, 41–47. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  68. Xiong, K.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H.; Lan, A.; Sui, Z. Stone into Gold: The Technology and Model of Rocky Desertification Rehabilitation in Guizhou; Guizhou Science and Technology Press: Guizhou, China, 2011; ISBN 9787806629000. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  69. Ahmed, Y.A.R.; Pichler, V.; Homolák, M.; Erika, G.; Dezső, N.; Magdaléna, P.; Juraj, G. High Organic Carbon Stock in a Karstic Soil of the Middle-European Forest Province Persists after Centuries-long Agroforestry Management. Eur. J. For. Res. 2012, 131, 1669–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Quine, T.; Guo, D.; Green, S.; Tu, C.; Hartley, L. Ecosystem Service Delivery in Karst Landscapes: Anthropogenic Perturbation and Recovery. Acta Geochim. 2017, 36, 416–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jiang, Z.; Yang, D. Comprehensive Measures for the Treatment of Rocky Desertification in Karst areas of Southwest China. In Proceedings of the Sino-US Symposium on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing, China, 1 November 2003; pp. 64–68. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  72. Yuan, D. Global View on Karst Rock Desertification and Integrating Control Measures and Experiences of China. Pratacult. Sci. 2008, 25, 19–25. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  73. Wang, D.; Yu, L.; Xiong, K. Preliminary Evaluation on Effect of Comprehensive Control and Restoration for Karst Rocky Desertification—A case of Huajiang area. J. Mou. Agric. Bio. 2005, 24, 233–238. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  74. Li, X.; He, C.; Jiang, Z. Method and Principles of Ecological Rehabilitation and Reconstruction in Fragile Karst Ecosystem. Carsologica Sin. 2003, 22, 12–17. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  75. Jiang, Z.; Xia, R.; Shi, J.; Fei, J.; He, S.; Liang, S. The Application Effects and Exploitation Capacity of Karst Underground Water Resources in Southwest China. Acta Earth Sin. 2006, 27, 495–502. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  76. Xiong, K.; Chen, Q. Discussion on Karst Rocky Desert Evolution Trend based on Ecologically Comprehensive Treatment. Carsologica Sin. 2010, 29, 50–56. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  77. Tan, Z. Remote Sensing on the Influence of the Implementation of Converting Land to Forest on Controlling Desertification in Karst Region. Res. Soil Water Conserv. 2006, 13, 35–37. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  78. Liang, B.; Liu, H.; Quine, T.A.; Chen, X.; Hallett, P.D.; Cressey, E.L.; Zhu, X.; Cao, J.; Yang, S.; Wu, L.; et al. Analysing and Simulating Spatial Patterns of Crop Yield in Guizhou Province based on Artificial Neural Networks. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2021, 45, 33–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tong, X.; Wang, K.; Brandt, M.; Yue, Y.; Liao, C.; Fensholt, R. Assessing Future Vegetation Trends and Restoration Prospects in the Karst Regions of Southwest China. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Feng, Q.; Liu, J.; Gong, J. UAV Remote Sensing for Urban Vegetation Mapping Using Random Forest and Texture Analysis. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 1074–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liu, K.; Shen, X.; Cao, L.; Wang, G.; Cao, F. Estimating Forest Structural Attributes Using UAV-LiDAR Data in Ginkgo Plantations. J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2018, 146, 465–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gobbi, B.; Van Rompaey, A.; Loto, D.; Gasparri, I.; Vanacker, V. Comparing Forest Structural Attributes Derived from UAV-Based Point Clouds with Conventional Forest Inventories in the Dry Chaco. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 4005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Li, R.; Wang, S.; Zhou, D.; Zhang, D.; Li, F.; Zhou, Z.; Xiong, K. The Correlation between Rocky Desertification and Lithology in Karst area of Guizhou. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2003, 58, 314–320. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  84. Wan, F.; Zhang, J. Ecological Characteristics and Vegetation Restoration Technology in the Karst Mountainous areas of Guizhou Province. J. Nanjing For. Univ. Nat. Sci. 2003, 27, 45–49. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  85. Liu, Z. Applications of Geochemical Proxies in Speleothem to the Study on Evelution and Impact Factor of Karst-Desertification in Central Western Guizhou during Morden and Contemporary Period. Ph.D. Thesis, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China, 2008. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  86. Moore, O.W.; Buss, H.L.; Green, S.M.; Liu, M.; Song, Z. The Importance of Non-carbonate Mineral Weathering as a Soil Formation Mechanism within a Karst Weathering Profile in the SPECTRA Critical Zone Observatory, Guizhou Province, China. Acta Geochim. 2017, 36, 566–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Geekiyanage, N.; Goodale, U.M.; Cao, K.; Kitajima, K. Plant Ecology of Tropical and Subtropical Karst Ecosystems. Biotropica 2019, 51, 626–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, Y.; Xiong, K.; Qin, Y.; Yu, Y.; Li, T. Stoichiometric Characteristics of Ecological-economic Forests on Karst Rocky Desertification Areas of Southern China. Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2020, 137, 109–131. [Google Scholar]
  89. Liu, P.; Xiao, H.; Chen, X. Temporal and Spatial Evolution Characteristics of Rocky Desertification Control Landscape Pattern in Salaxi Demonstration Area in Bijie City. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 33, 2316–2324. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  90. Su, W.; Zhu, W.; Xiong, K. Rocky Desertification and Its Eco-economic Control Model in Karst Mountainous areas of Guizhou Province. Carsologica Sin. 2002, 21, 21–26. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  91. Su, W.; Yang, H.; Li, Q.; Guo, Y.; Chen, Z. Rocky Land Desertification and Its Controlling Measurements in the Karst Mountainous Region, Southwest of China. J. Soil Sci. 2006, 37, 447–451. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  92. Li, Y.; Bai, X.; Wang, S.; Tian, Y. Integrating Mitigation Measures for Karst Rocky Desertification land in the Southwest Mountains of China. Carbonates Evaporites 2019, 34, 1095–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Xiong, K.; Kong, L.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Deng, X. The Impact of Multiple Driving Factors on Forest Ecosystem Services in Karst Desertification Control. Front. For. Glob. Change 2013, 6, 1220436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yue, Y.; Liao, C.; Tong, X.; Wu, Z.; Fensholt, F.; Prishchepov, A.; Jepsen, M.R.; Wang, K.; Brandt, M. Large Scale Reforestation of Farmlands on Sloping Hills in South China karst. Landsc. Ecol. 2020, 35, 1445–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Luo, X.; Xiong, K.; Zhang, J.; Chen, D. A Study on Optimal Agroforestry Planting Patterns in the Buffer Zone of World Natural Heritage Sites. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hao, X.; Xie, S.; Ouyang, X.; Luo, L.; Shi, S.; Li, L.; Sun, A.; Zhao, Z. Features of Spore-pollen Assemblage in Topsoil under Different Vegetation Types in Karst Desert—A case in Nanping Town, Nanchuan District, Chongqing. Carsologica Sin. 2010, 29, 301–311. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  97. Zhang, J.; Dai, M.; Wang, L.; Su, W.; Cao, L. Plant Selection and Their Ecological Adaptability for Rocky Desertification Control in Karst Region in the Southwest of China. Earth Environ. 2015, 43, 269–278. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  98. Li, R.; Wang, L.; Sheng, M.; Guo, J. Plant Species Diversity and Its Relationship with Soil Properties in Karst Rocky Desertification Succession. Res. Soil Water Conserv. 2016, 23, 111–119. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  99. Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liu, G.; Xiong, K.; Cai, L. Dynamic Variations in Soil moisture in an Epikarst Fissure in the Karst Rocky Desertification Area. J. Hydrol. 2020, 591, 125587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Liu, Z.; Li, K.; Xiong, K.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Sun, J.; Cai, L. Effects of Zanthoxylum bungeanum Planting on Soil Hydraulic Properties and Soil Moisture in a Karst Area. Agric. Water. Manag. 2021, 257, 107125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Meng, M.; Han, Y.; Chen, J.; Liu, X.; Guo, X.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, J. Long Term Forest Conversion Affected Soil Nanoscale Pores in Subtropical China. Catena 2020, 185, 104289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Tuyet, D. Characteristics of Karst Ecosystems of Vietnam and their Vulnerability to Human Impact. Acta Geol. Sin.-Engl. Ed. 2001, 75, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cai, Y.; Huo, Y. Reevaluating Cultivated Land in China: Method and case Studies. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2006, 61, 1084–1092. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  104. Jiang, Y.; Li, L.; Groves, C.; Yuan, D.; Kambesis, P. Relationships between Rocky Desertification and Spatial Pattern of Land use in Typical Karst area, Southwest China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2009, 59, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kiernan, K. Challenges for Environmentally Sustainable Development of Natural Resources in the Nam Ou karst, Northern Laos. Acta Carsologica 2011, 40, 341–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Chen, H.; Yang, J.; Fu, W.; He, F.; Wang, K. Characteristics of Slope Runoff and Sediment Yield on Karst Hill-slope with Different Land-use Types in Northwest Guangxi. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2012, 28, 121–126. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  107. Zhou, Z.; Yan, L.; Chen, Q. Evolutionary Mechanism and Control of Karst Rocky Desertification under Human Intervention; China Science Press: Beijing, China, 2015; ISBN 9787030492555. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  108. Chi, Y.; Xiong, K.; Hua, X.; Song, S.; Shen, X. Study on the Relationship Between Disposition Models of Forest and Grass and Soil Properties in Karst Rocky Desertification Areas of Southwest China. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2020, 29, 5424–5431. [Google Scholar]
  109. Xue, L.; Ren, H.; Li, S.; Leng, X.; Yao, X. Soil Bacterial Community Structure and Co-occurrence Pattern during Vegetation Restoration in Karst Rocky Desertification area. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Luo, Y.; Xiong, K.; Long, C.; Zhu, J. Interaction between Environment Degradation and Rural Poverty of Karst Regions in Guizhou. Guizhou Agric. Sci. 2009, 37, 207–211. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  111. Xiong, K.; Chi, Y. The Problems in Southern China Karst Ecosystem in Southern of China and Its Countermeasures. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 31, 23–30. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  112. Zhang, J.; Dai, M.; Wang, L.; Su, W. Household Livelihood Change under the Rocky Desertification Control Project in Karst areas, Southwest China. Land Use Policy 2016, 56, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Haryono, E.; Adji, T.; Cahyadi, A.; Widyastuti, M.; Listyaningsih, u.; Sulistyowati, E. Groundwater and Livelihood in Gunungsewu Karst Area, Indonesia. Groundwater for Sustainable Livelihoods and Equitable Growth; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  114. Wu, Z.; Xiong, K.; Zhu, D.; Xiao, J. Revelation of Coupled Ecosystem Quality and Landscape Patterns for Agroforestry Ecosystem Services Sustainability Improvement in the Karst Desertification Control. Agriculture 2023, 13, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Xu, E.; Zhang, H. Characterization and Interaction of Driving Factors in Karst Rocky Desertification: A Case Study from Changshun, China. Solid Earth. 2014, 5, 1329–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Jiang, Z.; Li, X.; Tan, X.; Lv, S.; Luo, W.; Lan, F.; Cao, J. Comprehensive Improving Technique to Rocky Desertification in Karst Peak-cluster Depression─A case Study at Guohua Ecological Experimental Area, Pingguo, Guangxi. Carsologica Sin. 2008, 27, 50–55. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  117. Jiang, Z.; Li, X.; Hu, B. Research on Rocky Desertification and Its Comprehensive Management in Karst Mountainous Areas of Guangxi; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2011; ISBN 978-7-03-031397-3. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  118. Sun, F.; Xie, S.; Li, Z. How to Develop Characteristic Agriculture in Chongqing with Diverse Landforms. J. Chongqing Three Gorges Univ. 2011, 27, 120–122. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  119. Xiao, H.; Xiong, K.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q. Research Progress for the Karst Rocky Desertification Control Models. Chin. J. Popul. Resour. Environ. 2012, 22, 420–424. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  120. Wang, K.; Yue, Y.; Chen, H.; Wu, X.; Xiao, J.; Qi, X.; Zhang, W.; Du, H. The Comprehensive Treatment of Karst Rocky Desertification and Its regional Restoration Effects. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 7432–7440. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  121. Du, Y. Harmony with Nature: Exploration and Practice in the Rocky Desertification Control of Karst Area; China Forestry Press: Beijing, China, 2011; ISBN 9787503864124. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  122. Jiang, Y.; Liu, X.; He, S.; He, B.; Xie, J.; Luo, W.; Bai, X.; Xiao, Q. Research and Development of Comprehensive Rehabilitation Measures for Land Rocky Desertification in Karst Trough Valley area. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2016, 36, 7092–7097. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  123. Zhang, Y.; Xiong, K.; Yu, Y.; Tan, D.; Cheng, W.; Xu, M. Research on Key Technology of Vegetation Restoration and Forest Industry Development in Karst Rocky Desertification Environment. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2018, 20, 19–25. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  124. Du, W.; Yan, H.; Zhen, L.; Hu, Y. The Experience and Practice of Desertification Control in Karst Region of Southwest China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 5798–5808. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  125. Li, L.; Fan, Z.; Xiong, K.; Shen, H.; Guo, Q.; Dan, W.; Li, R. Current Situation and Prospects of the Studies of Ecological Industries and Ecological Products in Eco-fragile areas. Environ. Res. 2021, 201, 111613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Ren, B.; Xiong, K.; Wang, Q. Revitalization Mechanism of Specialty Industries in the Karst Rocky Desertification areas: From a Perspective of the Actor-network Theory. Growth Change 2022, 53, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zhao, G.; Chen, F.; Yuan, C.; Yang, J.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yang, J.; Aurele, G.A.; Li, X.; Xu, J. Response Strategies of Woody Seedlings to Shading and Watering over Time after Topsoil Translocation in Dry-hot Karst Region of China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 519, 120319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ren, B.; Ren, X.; Xiong, K. Research on the Mechanism of Poverty Alleviation of Farmers' Cooperatives and the Path of Improving the Efficiency of Poverty Alleviation from the Perspective of Collective Action Theory. Rural Econ. 2020, 5, 42–49. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  129. Wang, K.; Yue, Y.; Ma, Z.; Lei, T.; Li, D.; Song, T. Research and Demonstration on Technologies for Rocky Desertification Treatment and Ecosystem Services Enhancement in Karst Peak-cluster Depression Regions. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2016, 36, 7098–7102. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  130. Tian, Y.; Wang, S.; Bai, X.; Luo, G.; Xu, Y. Trade-offs among Ecosystem Services in a Typical Karst Watershed, SW China. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 566, 1297–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, G.; Wang, B.; Peng, S.; He, R.; Zhou, C. Zoning of Environment Geology and Functions in Karst Fault-depression Basins. Carsologica Sin. 2017, 36, 283–295. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  132. Green, S.M.; Dungait, J.A.J.; Tu, C.; Tu, C.; Buss, H.L.; Sanderson, N.; Hawkes, S.J.; Xiong, K.; Yue, F.; Hussey, V.; et al. Soil Functions and Ecosystem Services Research in the Chinese Karst Critical Zone. Chem. Geol. 2019, 527, 119107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Li, S.; Zhao, X.; Pu, J.; Miao, P.; Wang, Q.; Tan, K. Optimize and Control Territorial Spatial Functional areas to Improve the Ecological Stability and Total Environment in Karst areas of Southwest China. Land Use Policy 2021, 100, 104940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Zhang, S.; Xiong, K.; Qin, Y.; Min, X.; Xiao, J. Evolution and Determinants of Ecosystem Services: Insights from South China Karst. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 133, 108437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Hu, Z.; Wang, S.; Bai, X.; Luo, G.; Li, Q.; Wu, L.; Yang, Y.; Tian, S.; Li, C.; Deng, Y. Changes in Ecosystem Service Values in Karst Areas of China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 301, 107026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Tong, X.; Wang, K.; Yue, Y.; Brandt, M.; Liu, B.; Zhang, C.; Liao, C.; Fensholt, R. Quantifying the Effectiveness of Ecological Restoration Projects on Long-term Vegetation Dynamics in the Karst Regions of Southwest China. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2017, 54, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Zhao, R.; Xiong, K.; Chen, Q. Spatial Variation and Regional Type Division of Rural Poverty in Typical Karst areas from the Perspective of Multi-dimensional Poverty. Trans. Chin Soc. Agric. Eng. 2020, 36, 232–240. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  138. Zhao, R.; Xiong, K.; Chen, Q. Spatial Distribution and Its Determinants of Poverty in Typical Karst area based on Geodetectors. Chin. J. Agric. Resour. Reg. Plan 2021, 42, 84–95. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  139. Chen, Q.; Lu, S.; Xiong, K.; Zhao, R. Coupling Analysis on Ecological Environment Fragility and Poverty in South China Karst. Environ. Res. 2021, 201, 111605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Agustono, S.; Fajarningsih, R.; Ulfa, A.; Antriyandarti, E. Karst Ecosystem in Gunungkidul, Southern Java: Natural Resources and Poverty. J. Austrian Soc. Agric. Econ. 2021, 17, 529–537. [Google Scholar]
  141. Zhang, M.; Wang, K.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, C.; Yue, Y.; Qi, X. Spatio-temporal Variation and Impact Factors for Vegetation Carbon Sequestration and Oxygen Production based on Rocky Desertification Control in the Karst Region of Southwest China. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Tong, X.; Brandt, M.; Yue, Y.; Horion, S.; Wang, K.; Keersmaecker, W.d.; Tian, F.; Schurgers, G.; Xiao, X.; Luo, Y.; et al. Increased Vegetation Growth and Carbon Stock in China Karst via Ecological Engineering. Nat. Sustain. 2018, 1, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Wu, J.; Liu, S.; Li, J.; He, X.; Su, Y.; Qiu, Q.; Bai, J.; Wang, Y.; Jia, P. Photosynthetic and Water Consumption of Tree Species Utilized for Afforestation of Rocky Desert in Guangdong Province. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2015, 36, 3429–3440. [Google Scholar]
  144. Xu, Y.; Deng, Y.; Cao, J.; Jiang, Z.; Yue, X.; Zhu, X. Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Fertility in Karst Faulted basin and Its Influencing Factors. Res. Soil Water Conserv. 2019, 26, 355–362. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  145. Guo, Y.; Xiong, K.; Sun, R.; Yan, J. Model of Rural Low-carbon Communities in Karst Rocky Desertification Region of Southern China and Approaches to Benefit Improvement. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2021, 37, 323–331. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  146. Li, Y.; Xiong, K.; Liu, Z.; Li, K.; Luo, D. Distribution and Influencing Factors of Soil Organic Carbon in a Typical Karst Catchment Undergoing Natural Restoration. Catena 2022, 212, 106078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Wang, X.; Liu, Z.; Xiong, K.; He, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, K. Characteristics and Controlling Factors of Soil Dissolved Organic Matter in the Rainy Season after Vegetation Restoration in a Karst Drainage area, South China. Catena 2022, 217, 106483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Wang, K.; Hu, D.; Deng, J.; Shangguan, Z.; Deng, L. Biomass Carbon Storages and Carbon Sequestration Potentials of the Grain for Green Program-Covered Forests in China. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 8, 7451–7461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Lu, Y.; Yao, S.; Ding, Z.; Deng, Y.; Hou, M. Did Government Expenditure on the Grain for Green Project Help the Forest Carbon Sequestration Increase in Yunnan, China? Land 2020, 9, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Deng, L.; Liu, S.; Kim, D.G.; Peng, C.; Sweeney, S.; Shangguan, Z. Past and Future Carbon Sequestration Benefits of China’s Grain for Green Program. Glob. Environ. Change 2017, 47, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Xiong, K. Huajiang River—A Pioneering Work of Comprehensive Control of Rocky Desertification. Contemp. Guizhou 2004, 22, 14. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  152. Li, A.; Guo, C.; Fu, Y.; Long, X. Spatiotemporal Variation of Soil Physical Characteristics in Rocky Desertification areas of Guizhou Karst-cluster Depression. Carsologica Sin. 2017, 36, 202–206, 241. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  153. Yang, Q.; Jiang, Z.; Yuan, D.; Ma, Z.; Xie, Y. Temporal and Spatial Changes of Karst Rocky Desertification in Ecological Reconstruction Region of Southwest China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2014, 72, 4483–4489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Budiyanto, E. Spasio-Temporal Variability of the Vegetation Cover Density in the Gunungsewu Karst Landscape Based on Landsat 8 OLI Data. Adv. Sci. Lett. 2017, 23, 11641–11644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Gao, J.; Xiong, K. Relationship between Karst Rocky Desertification and Land Use in Different Landform Environments. Bull. Soil Water Conserv. 2014, 34, 97–101, 140. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  156. Zuo, T.; Diao, C.; Su, W.; Sun, X.; Guan, D. Spatial-temporal Evolution Process and Characteristics of Rocky Desertification in Bijie Experimental area. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2014, 34, 7067–7077. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  157. Wang, H.; Li, Q.; Du, X.; Zhao, L. Quantitative Extraction of the Bedrock Exposure Rate Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Data and Landsat-8 OLI image in a Karst Environment. Front. Earth Sci. 2018, 12, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Wen, L.; Li, Z. Evolution Characteristics of Rocky Desertification during 2004–2016 in Guizhou Province, China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2020, 40, 5928–5939. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  159. Fan, F.; Wang, K.; Xuan, Y.; Yue, Y. Eco-environment Sensitivity and Its Spatial Distribution in Karst Regions, Southwest China. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2011, 20, 1394–1399. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  160. Liu, X.; Qin, Y.; Zou, Z.; Zhang, K.; Pan, Z.; Liu, Q.; Yao, L. Influence of Different Vegetation on Soil Organic Matter Content in Karst Rocky Desertification Region in Guangxi province. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2009, 25, 394–398. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  161. Ying, B.; Xiong, K.; Chen, Q.; Xiao, S. Distribution Features of Rocky Desertification and Land Use Status in Karst Area. Soil Water Conserv. Bull. 2012, 32, 190–193. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  162. Cai, Y.; Li, J. Measurement of Land Use Sustainability: A Comprehensive Approach to Show the Process. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2003, 58, 305–313. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  163. Zhu, D.; Xiong, K.; Xiao, H.; Gu, X. Variation Characteristics of Rainfall Erosivity in Guizhou Province and the Correlation with the El Niño Southern Oscillation. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 691, 835–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Ozgul, M.; Dindaroglu, T. Multi-criteria Analysis for Mapping of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in a Karst Ecosystem. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 16529–16559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Lan, J. Responses of Soil Organic Carbon Components and Their Sensitivity to Karst Rocky Desertification Control Measures in Southwest China. J. Soils Sediments 2021, 21, 978–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Zhao, S.; Su, J.; Wu, J.; Liu, N. Changes of Soil Aggregate Organic Carbon During Process of Vegetation Restoration in Ziwuling. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2006, 3, 114–117. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  167. Li, X.; Xiong, K.; Gong, J.; Chen, Y. Advances in Research on the Function of Artificial Grassland in Karst Rock Desertification Control. J. Gra. Ind. 2011, 20, 279–286. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  168. Zhang, S.; Xiong, K.; Deng, X.; Kong, L.; Min, X. Impact of Ecological Restoration on Ecosystem Service Trade-offs: Insight from kKarst Desertification Control. Land Degrad. Dev. 2023, 30, 2693–2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Liu, C.; Huang, Y.; Wu, F.; Liu, W.; Ning, Y.; Huang, Z.; Tang, S.; Liang, Y. Plant adaptability in karst regions. J. Plant Res. 2021, 134, 889–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Xiao, Q.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tao, J. Driving forest succession in karst areas of Chongqing municipality over the past decade. For. Ecosyst. 2020, 7, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Wu, W.; Jiang, Y.; Jia, Y.; Peng, X.; Duan, S.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z. Spatial and Temporal Distribution of the δD and δ~ (18)O in a Typical Karst Valley: A case Study of Zhongliang Mountain, Chongqing City. Environ. Sci. 2018, 39, 132–141. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  172. Wang, S.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, D. Karst Rocky Desertification in Southwestern China: Geomorphology, Land-use, Impact and Rehabilitation. Land Degrad. Dev. 2004, 15, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Peng, T.; Wang, S. Effects of Land Use, Land cover and Rainfall Regimes on the Surface Runoff and Soil loss on Karst Slopes in Southwest China. Catena 2012, 90, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Wang, Z.; Xiong, K.; Wu, C.; Luo, D.; Xiao, J.; Shen, C. Characteristics of Soil Moisture Variation in Agroforestry in Karst Region. Land 2023, 12, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Cai, L.; Xiong, K.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Fan, B. Seasonal Variations of Plant Water use in the Karst Desertification Control. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 885, 163778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Jiang, Z.; Lian, Y.; Qin, X. Rocky Desertification in Southwest China: Impacts, Causes, and Restoration. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2014, 132, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Yang, Q.; Wang, K.; Zhang, C.; Yue, Y.; Tian, R.; Fan, F. Spatio-temporal Evolution of Rocky Desertification and Its Driving Forces in Karst Areas of Northwestern Guangxi, China. Environ. Earth. Sci. 2011, 64, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Wang, S.; Li, R.; Sun, C.; Zhang, D.; Li, F.; Zhou, D.; Xiong, K.; Zhou, Z. How Types of Carbonate Rock Assemblages Constrain the Distribution of Karst Rocky Desertified Land in Guizhou Province, PR China: Phenomena and Mechanisms. Land Degrad. Dev. 2004, 15, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Huang, Q.; Cai, Y. Assessment of Karst Rocky Desertification using the Radial Basis Function Network Model and GIS Technique: A case Study of Guizhou Province, China. Environ. Geol. 2006, 49, 1173–1179. [Google Scholar]
  180. Xiong, Y.; Qiu, G.; Mo, D.; Lin, H.; Sun, H.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, S.; Yin, J. Rocky Desertification and Its Causes in Karst Areas: A Case Study in Yongshun County, Hunan Province, China. Environ. Geol. 2009, 57, 1481–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Li, Y.; Shao, J.; Yang, H.; Bai, X. The Relations between Land use and Karst Rocky Desertification in a Typical Karst Area, China. Environ. Geol. 2009, 57, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Wang, J.; Zou, B.; Liu, Y.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yang, P. Erosion-creep-collapse Mechanism of Underground Soil Loss for the Karst Rocky Desertification in Chenqi Village, Puding County, Guizhou, China. Environ. Earth. sci. 2014, 72, 2751–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Yan, X.; Cai, Y. Multi-scale Anthropogenic Driving Forces of Karst Rocky Desertification in Southwest China. Land Degrad. Dev. 2015, 26, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Xie, L.; Zhong, J.; Chen, F.; Cao, F.; Li, J.; Wu, L. Evaluation of Soil Fertility in the Succession of Karst Rocky Desertification Using Principal Component Analysis. Solid Earth 2015, 6, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Fu, Z.; Chen, H.; Zhang, W.; Xu, Q.; Wang, S.; Wang, K. Subsurface Flow in a Soil-mantled Subtropical Dolomite Karst Slope: A Field Rainfall Simulation Study. Geomorphol 2015, 250, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Li, Y.; Bai, X.; Zhou, Y.; Qin, L.; Tian, X.; Tian, Y.; Li, P. Spatial–temporal Evolution of Soil Erosion in a Typical Mountainous Karst Basin in SW China, based on GIS and RUSLE. Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 2016, 41, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Dai, Q.; Peng, X.; Yang, Z.; Zhao, L. Runoff and Erosion Processes on Bare Slopes in the Karst Rocky Desertification Area. Catena 2017, 152, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Dai, Q.; Peng, X.; Zhao, L.; Shao, H.; Yang, Z. Effects of Underground Pore Fissures on Soil Rrosion and Sediment Yield on Karst Slopes. Land Degrad. Dev. 2017, 28, 1922–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Zhang, C.; Qi, X.; Wang, K.; Zhang, M.; Yue, Y. The Application of Geospatial Techniques in Monitoring Karst Vegetation Recovery in Southwest China: A review. Prog. Phys. Geo. 2017, 41, 450–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Yan, Y.; Dai, Q.; Yuan, Y.; Peng, X.; Zhao, L.; Yang, J. Effects of Rainfall Intensity on Runoff and Sediment Yields on Bare Slopes in a Karst Area, SW China. Geoderma 2018, 330, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Liao, C.; Yue, Y.; Wang, K.; Fensholt, R.; Tong, X.; Brandt, M. Ecological Restoration Enhances Ecosystem Health in the Karst Regions of Southwest China. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 90, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Zhang, M.; Wang, K.; Liu, H.; Zhang, C.; Yue, Y.; Qi, X. Effect of Ecological Engineering Projects on Ecosystem Services in a Karst Region: A Case Study of Northwest Guangxi, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 183, 831–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Sheng, M.; Xiong, K.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Li, R.; Tian, X. Response of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties to Rocky Desertification Succession in South China Karst. Carbonates Evaporites 2018, 33, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Dai, Q.; Peng, X.; Wang, P.; Li, C.; Shao, H. Surface Erosion and Underground Leakage of Yellow Soil on Slopes in Karst Regions of Southwest China. Land Degrad. Develop. 2018, 29, 2438–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Gao, J.; Wang, H. Temporal Analysis on Quantitative Attribution of Karst Soil Erosion: A Case Study of a Peak-cluster Depression Basin in Southwest China. Catena 2019, 172, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Tang, J.; Tang, X.; Qin, Y.; He, Q.; Yi, Y.; Ji, Z. Karst Rocky Desertification Progress: Soil Calcium as a Possible Driving Force. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 649, 1250–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Yan, Y.; Dai, Q.; Wang, X.; Jin, L.; Mei, L. Response of Shallow Karst Fissure Soil Quality to Secondary Succession in a Degraded Karst Area of Southwestern China. Geoderma 2019, 348, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Peng, X.; Dai, Q.; Ding, G.; Li, C. Role of Underground Leakage in Soil, Water and Nutrient Loss from a Rock-mantled Slope in the Karst Rocky Desertification Area. J. Hydrol. 2019, 578, 124086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Zhang, Y.; Xu, X.; Li, Z.; Liu, M.; Xu, C.; Zhang, R.; Luo, W. Effects of Vegetation Restoration on Soil Quality in Degraded Karst Landscapes of Southwest China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 650, 2657–2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Guo, B.; Zang, W.; Luo, W. Spatial-temporal Shifts of Ecological Vulnerability of Karst Mountain Ecosystem-impacts of Global Change and Anthropogenic Interference. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 741, 140256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Peng, X.; Dai, Q.; Ding, G.; Shi, D.; Li, C. Impact of Vegetation Restoration on Soil Properties in Near-surface Fissures Located in Karst Rocky Desertification Regions. Soil.Tillage Res. 2020, 200, 104620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Zhang, X.; Yue, Y.; Tong, X.; Wang, K.; Qi, X.; Deng, C.; Brandt, M. Eco-engineering Controls Vegetation Trends in Southwest China karst. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 770, 145160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Zhao, S.; Wu, X.; Zhou, J.; Pereira, P. Spatiotemporal Tradeoffs and Synergies in Vegetation Vitality and Poverty Transition in Rocky Desertification Area. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 752, 141770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Peng, X.; Dai, Q. Drivers of Soil Erosion and Subsurface Loss by Soil Leakage during Karst Rocky Desertification in SW China. Int. Soil. Water Conser. Res. 2022, 10, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Lu, C.; Shu, L.; Chen, X.; Cheng, C. Parameter Estimation for a Karst Aquifer with Unknown Thickness Using the Genetic Algorithm Method. Environ. Earth Sci. 2011, 63, 797–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Baptista, I.; Irvine, B.; Fleskens, L.; Geissen, V.; Ritsema, C. Assessing the Biophysical Impact and Financial Viability of Soil Management Technologies Under Variable Climate in Cabo Verde Drylands: The PESERA-DESMICE Approach. Land Degrad. Dev. 2016, 27, 1679–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Viossanges, M.; Pavelic, P.; Rebelo, L.; Lacombe, G.; Sotoukee, T. Regional Mapping of Groundwater Resources in Data-scarce Regions: The case of Laos. Hydrology 2017, 5, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Bai, X.; Wang, S.; Chen, Q.; Cheng, A.; Ni, X. Spatial-temporal Evolution Process and Its Evaluation Method of Karst Rocky Desertification in Guizhou Province. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2009, 64, 609–618. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  209. Zhang, X.; Wang, S.; Bai, X.; Chen, W.; Zhang, S. Relationship between the Spatial Distribution of Karst Land Desertification and Geomorphology, Lithology, Precipitation, and Population Density in Guizhou Province. Earth Environ. 2013, 41, 1–6. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  210. Parise, M.; Pascali, V. Surface and Subsurface Environmental Degradation in the Karst of Apulia (southern Italy). Environ. Geol. 2003, 44, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Sauro, U. Human Impact on the Karst of the Venetian Fore-Alps, Italy. Environ. Geol. 1993, 21, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Barnett, J. Security and climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 2003, 13, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Xu, R. Progress of International Research of Karst Rocky Desertification based on CiteSpace. Carsologica Sin. 2021, 40, 728–738. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  214. Li, Q. Research Hotspots of Karst in 2016 based on Bibliometrics Analysis. Adv. Earth Sci. 2017, 32, 535–545. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Left is a fragile karst desertification (KD) landscape and right is agricultural production in KD areas.
Figure 1. Left is a fragile karst desertification (KD) landscape and right is agricultural production in KD areas.
Forests 15 00126 g001
Figure 2. The process of the literature search and screening.
Figure 2. The process of the literature search and screening.
Forests 15 00126 g002
Figure 3. Annual distribution of the literature on KD based on six months of bibliometrics from 1 January 1995 to 30 June 2023.
Figure 3. Annual distribution of the literature on KD based on six months of bibliometrics from 1 January 1995 to 30 June 2023.
Forests 15 00126 g003
Figure 4. Research situation of KD in China.
Figure 4. Research situation of KD in China.
Forests 15 00126 g004
Figure 5. Time zone visualization of hot keywords on KD based on CNKI from 1 January 1995 to 30 June 2023.
Figure 5. Time zone visualization of hot keywords on KD based on CNKI from 1 January 1995 to 30 June 2023.
Forests 15 00126 g005
Figure 6. Time zone visualization of hot keywords on KD based on WoS from 1 January 1995 to 30 June 2023.
Figure 6. Time zone visualization of hot keywords on KD based on WoS from 1 January 1995 to 30 June 2023.
Forests 15 00126 g006
Figure 7. Timeline visualization of pivotal research clusters on KD based on CNKI from 1 January 1995 to 30 June 2023.
Figure 7. Timeline visualization of pivotal research clusters on KD based on CNKI from 1 January 1995 to 30 June 2023.
Forests 15 00126 g007
Figure 8. Timeline visualization of pivotal research clusters on KD based on WoS from 1 January 1995 to 30 June 2023.
Figure 8. Timeline visualization of pivotal research clusters on KD based on WoS from 1 January 1995 to 30 June 2023.
Forests 15 00126 g008
Figure 9. Time zone visualization of the literature co-citations on KD based on WoS from 1 January 1995 to 30 June 2023 [38,40,79,97,99,109,115,130,132,136,142,165,172,176,177,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204].
Figure 9. Time zone visualization of the literature co-citations on KD based on WoS from 1 January 1995 to 30 June 2023 [38,40,79,97,99,109,115,130,132,136,142,165,172,176,177,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204].
Forests 15 00126 g009
Figure 10. Main collaborative mapping of the literature on KD based on WoS.
Figure 10. Main collaborative mapping of the literature on KD based on WoS.
Forests 15 00126 g010
Figure 11. Collaborative authorship mapping of the literature based on CNKI on KD.
Figure 11. Collaborative authorship mapping of the literature based on CNKI on KD.
Forests 15 00126 g011
Figure 12. Collaborative authorship mapping of the literature based on WoS on KD.
Figure 12. Collaborative authorship mapping of the literature based on WoS on KD.
Forests 15 00126 g012
Table 1. Literature search strings.
Table 1. Literature search strings.
DatabaseSearch Terms (by Study Title, Abstract, and Keywords)NumberSearch Date
CNKI“rocky mountain” or “stony mountain” or “rocky desertification” or “stony desertification” or “karst desertification” or “karst rocky desertification”928915 October 2023
WoS“karst rocky desertification” or “karst desertification” or “rocky desertification” or “stony desertification”85215 October 2023
Total 10,14115 October 2023
Table 2. Top 10 institutions in terms of the literature on KD.
Table 2. Top 10 institutions in terms of the literature on KD.
CNKI InstitutionsNumberWoS InstitutionsNumber
Guizhou Normal University584Guizhou Normal University167
Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS154Guizhou University80
Institute of Geochemistry, CAS138Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS54
Guizhou University129Institute of Geographic Sciences and Nature Resources Research, CAS49
Southwest University115Institute of Geochemistry, CAS43
Guangxi Normal University80Southwest University41
Central South University of Forestry and Technology69Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, CAS40
Guangxi University61China University of Geosciences23
Southwest Forestry University59Research Institute of Forestry, CAF23
Beijing Forestry University57Peking University22
Table 3. Top 10 authors in terms of the literature on KD.
Table 3. Top 10 authors in terms of the literature on KD.
CNKI AuthorsNumberCentralityWoS AuthorsNumberCentrality
Kangning Xiong
(Guizhou Normal University)
2060.17Kangning Xiong
(Guizhou Normal University)
510.09
Shijie Wang
(Institute of Geochemistry, CAS)
830.04Kelin Wang
(Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, CAS)
350.05
Yangbing Li
(Guizhou Normal University)
550.01Quanhou Dai
(Guizhou University)
310.00
Zhongfa Zhou
(Guizhou Normal University)
480.02Shijie Wang
(Institute of Geochemistry, CAS)
240.10
Shiyou Xie
(Southwest University)
440.00Xiaoyong Bai
(Institute of Geochemistry, CAS)
230.00
Zhongcheng Jiang
(Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS)
410.01Yuemin Yue
(Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, CAS)
220.00
Baoqing Hu
(Nanning Normal University)
390.01Xudong Peng
(Guizhou University)
200.00
Xiebao Wu
(National Forestry and Grassland Administration)
380.02Yongkuan Chi
(Guizhou Normal University)
180.00
Ziqi Liu
(Guizhou Normal University)
370.00Xianfei Huang
(Guizhou Normal University)
140.06
Xinqiu Dan
(National Forestry and Grassland Administration)
260.01Zhenming Zhang
(Guizhou University)
130.00
Table 4. Top 12 keyword bursts with the strongest citations in the last decade on KD.
Table 4. Top 12 keyword bursts with the strongest citations in the last decade on KD.
CNKI KeywordYearBurstWoS KeywordYearBurst
afforestation technology20131.11ecological product20142.78
comprehensive evaluation20131.44ecosystem services20143.06
index system20132.75afforestation20161.5
benefit analysis20141.02estimating ecological indicators20162.55
governance model20142.29plant diversity20191.84
human intervention20152.28net primary production20191.84
big data20171.83karst ecosystem20192.27
ecological industry20182.93soil organic carbon20193.4
ecological stoichiometry20183.66green program20201.08
influencing factors20193.95conservation20201.19
afforestation effect20201.12ecological restoration projects20211.28
driving factors20211.6projects20211.92
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, M.; Yuan, Z. The Global Situation of Karst Desertification Research Based on Forest Ecology. Forests 2024, 15, 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15010126

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Zhang M, Yuan Z. The Global Situation of Karst Desertification Research Based on Forest Ecology. Forests. 2024; 15(1):126. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15010126

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yu, Zhaohui Zhang, Mingsheng Zhang, and Zhouwei Yuan. 2024. "The Global Situation of Karst Desertification Research Based on Forest Ecology" Forests 15, no. 1: 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15010126

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop