Next Article in Journal
Methods of Rut Depth Measurements on Forwarder Trails in Lowland Forest
Next Article in Special Issue
Accumulation Pattern and Potential Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals in Topsoil as Affected by Diverse Sources in Different Ecosystems in Western Dabie Mountain
Previous Article in Journal
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Stocks and Their Influencing Factors in Different-Aged Stands of Sand-Fixing Caragana korshinskii in the Mu Us Desert of Northwest China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Variability of Concentrations of Potentially Toxic Metals in the Topsoil of Urban Forest Parks (Southern Poland)

by
Oimahmad Rahmonov
1,*,
Agnieszka Kowal
2,
Małgorzata Rahmonov
3 and
Sławomir Pytel
4
1
Faculty of Natural Sciences, Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland
2
Independent Researcher, Str. Ostrogórska 15, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland
3
Museum of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland
4
Faculty of Natural Sciences, The Institute of Social and Economic Geography and Spatial Management, University of Silesia, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2024, 15(6), 1020; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15061020
Submission received: 18 May 2024 / Revised: 8 June 2024 / Accepted: 11 June 2024 / Published: 12 June 2024

Abstract

:
Forest ecosystems and urban parks are an integral part of the natural environment and the natural system of a city, where they form a mosaic of habitats resulting from the variation in soil cover due to human activities. The study was conducted in urban forests in five urban parks in Upper Silesia (southern Poland) and investigated the chemical properties and content of potentially toxic metals (PTMs) in the topsoil, which had an average thickness of 15 cm for all samples. The soil reaction ranged from acidic (pH = 4.7–5.1, in KCl) to slightly acidic (pH = 5.6, to neutral—6.6–7.2) at most sites. The organic carbon (OC) content was relatively high at all sites, ranging from 1.19 to 14.3%, with the highest total nitrogen (Nt) content being 0.481%. The average total phosphorus (Pt) content in the parks ranged from 310 mg kg−1 to 684 mg kg−1, while the highest values were 1840 mg kg−1. The total Cr, Cu, Co and Ni content was within acceptable limits, while the Zn, Pb, Cd, As, Sr and Ba exceeded acceptable standards. In terms of content, Zn dominated the PTMs at each site (Zn > Pb > Ba > Sr > Cu > Cr > As > Ni > Cd > Co), while Ba and Pb alternated in taking second place (Zn > Ba > Pb > Sr > Cu > Cr > Ni > As > Co > Cd). Environmental indicators, such as the geoaccumulation index (Igeo), enrichment factor (EF) and potential ecological risk index (RI), showed that the analyzed soils are highly contaminated with PTMs. Among the sources of pollution in the urban forest are low emissions from coal combustion, industrial activities, water runoff from streets and proximity to transportation routes. Identification of PTM levels in urban parks will provide valuable information on the behavior of these metals, which is important in sustainable development and can help evaluate the local spatial development plans of urbanized areas.

1. Introduction

Industrial development, particularly intense in Europe at the turn of the 20th century, brought significant changes to cities, mainly in areas rich in natural resources. More and more areas are now being developed for industrial purposes without programs to improve the environment and spatial order of newly built cities, apart from the fact that city parks have been created in some places [1]. Forest parks are an essential component of urban green spaces and serve various purposes, such as recreation, health and social functions and improving the urban environment [2,3,4].
Comprehending the complicated nature of how soil systems function and their interaction with human activities is particularly important in urban forest areas, which are most often urban parks. Due to continuous human existence and human activity, these soils are often cut down or buried under transported material and highly compacted and contaminated. As a result, their hydrological properties, degree of compaction and disturbance and displacement of material from the original levels are very different from natural soil types.
The city has become a new environment of anthropogenic soils due to transformed natural soils or their complete destruction due to human activities [5]. The formation of urban soils and their properties are linked to the history of the city and the numerous transformations in the course of urbanization [6], as well as the associated forests and urban greenery. Some authors call the evolution of urban soils ‘anthropogenic gene transformation’ [7]. Thus, each new land use changes the properties of the soil, and the soil starts to take on other functions.
In recent centuries, and particularly in the last few decades, human activity has continuously increased the level of heavy metals (HMs) circulating in the environment [8,9,10]. The mobility of heavy metals in the urban soil environment has become an essential process in the geochemical cycle in the environment [11,12,13]. Environmental contamination with trace elements is now an essential topic for analysis. This mainly concerns urban areas, which are characterized by the increased content of potentially toxic elements, especially in the surface layer of the ground [14,15,16]. There is a significant spatial variation in metal content mainly arising from the way urban environments develop and function [17,18,19,20,21].
Studies on soil contamination in urban parks and squares have been carried out in different regions of the world using different approaches and taking into account potential toxic metals [2,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Studies of urban soils in Poland included the assessment of heavy metal contamination, physicochemical properties and their classification [9,10,18,31,32,33,34,35,36,37].
In order to determine the occurrence of topsoil pollution with potentially toxic metals, their levels are compared with their content from the local geochemical background using the calculations of the geoaccumulation index (Igeo), enrichment factor (EF), contamination factor (CF) or pollution load index (PLI) [38,39]. Luo et al. [40] and Madrid et al. [22] confirm that the main factors influencing the distribution of heavy metals in the soil profile are the content of humus and iron and manganese oxides, as well as texture, soil pH and the rinsing processes, accompanied by the movement of water within the soil profile.
The concentration of potentially toxic metals in the soil is determined by lithogenesis and pedogenesis. It depends on the mineralogical composition, the nature of the parent rock and the direction and rate of soil formation, which determines the distribution of toxic elements in the soil profile [8,9,10,40,41,42]. Such metals are more mobile than those of pedogenic origin. In parks and urban areas, sources of potentially toxic metals are of anthropogenic origin. In urban areas, the nature of metal accumulation and their genesis in soils varies, and this is often due to the way urban areas are managed (mowing, fertilization, proximity to transport networks). Thus, their occurrence differs from that in natural soils [43]. This study aims to determine the content of potentially toxic metals in the topsoil of urban parks in a post-mining city.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Soil Sampling

The study was conducted in urban parks in Sosnowiec, which is located in southern Poland (Figure 1). The city is considered a typical example of those in the Katowice agglomeration. It developed dynamically during the industrialization of the second half of the 19th century and in the post-war period—the 1970s and 1980s [44].
The condition of the natural environment and the spatial development of the part of the city analyzed here were influenced primarily by the exploitation of hard coal deposits as well as the metallurgy industry [45]. As a result of past intensive industrial development, the devastation of the natural environment is a problem for Sosnowiec. The first parks in Sosnowiec were created on the initiative of foreign industrialists living within 19th century Sosnowiec [46]. The construction of urban parks in this region contributed to the attractiveness of the area and resulted in accelerated urbanization, which undoubtedly had an impact on how the ecosystem functioned. Table 1 shows the main characteristics of the parks studied. The plant cover of the parks is predominantly made up of numerous trees and shrubs. Most of these, however, are artificial plantings of various ages. They are further formed into decorative groups of tree-lined alleys, rows, hedges, lawns and many other spatial compositions [4]. Native trees in the parks include such species as Carpinus betulus, Tila cordata, Acer platanoides, A. pseudoplatanus, A. campestre, Alnus glutinosa, Quercus robur, Populus alba, P. tremula, P. nigra, Pinus sylvestris and Abies alba. The herbs/lawns are mown regularly.
In addition to native species, there are also alien species such as Acer negundo, Acer saccharinum, Robinia pseudoacacia, Ailanthus altissima, Catalpa bignonioides, Q. rubra, Pinus nigra and Picea pungens, as well as herbaceous species of alien origin, such as Impatiens parviflora, Solidago gigantea or Reynoutria japonica, apart from cultivars [13,26].
The main criterion for the number of soil samples taken from individual parks was their size. When selecting places, the principle was that the points should be distributed relatively evenly throughout the park. A total of 120 soil samples with thicknesses ranging from 0–10 to 25 cm were taken from the humus horizon, mainly in the root zones. The largest number of samples—33 samples (11 points)—were taken from the biggest park (48 ha)—Park Leśna (PL), 24 samples (8 points) were taken from Park Sielecki (PS), which is the second in order (10.4 ha) and definitely bigger than the other three, while 21 samples for analysis were taken from the other three parks—Park Dietla (PD, 7 sampling points), Park Schöena (PSch, 7 sampling points) and Park Kruczkowski (PK, 7 sampling points). Three 1 m2 soil samples were taken from each point, which, after drying, were mixed and analyzed in the laboratory as one sample.

2.2. Chemical and Physical Analysis of the Soil

In the laboratory, air-dried samples were sieved (<1 mm) and analyzed following the standard procedures described by Bednarek et al. [47], i.e., the pH was measured potentiometrically in H2O, the 1N KCl was measured using the potentiometric method in 1:2.5 soil/solution suspensions, while the total organic carbon (OCtot) was measured according to Tyurin’s method, the total nitrogen (Nt) was measured using the Kjeldahl method and the hydrolithic acidity (Hh) was measured according to the Kappen method [47].
The total content of potential toxic elements (Pb, Cd, Ba, Zn, Fe, Mn, Cr, Cu, Co, Ni, As, and Sr) in the soil was determined using the ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry) technique after wet mineralization in aqua regia (3HCl + HNO3). The analysis was performed in the ACME Laboratory (Vancouver, Canada) using AQ250_EXT (soils). All soil samples were analyzed in triplicate for all the parameters being investigated, and the mean values were then calculated.

2.3. Data Analyses—Environmental Indices

In the estimation of the geoaccumulation index (Igeo), the regional geochemical background values set by Lis and Pasieczna [48] were used. For individual elements, this background was determined as follows: As-6.0 mg·kg−1, Ba-59 mg·kg−1, Cd-2.0 mg·kg−1, Co-2.0 mg·kg−1, Cr-8.0 mg·kg−1, Cu-9.0 mg·kg−1, Ni-6.0 mg·kg−1, Pb-77.0 mg·kg−1, Sr-9.0 mg·kg−1 and Zn-184.0 mg·kg−1. Regional geochemical background values were determined (for particular elements) by means of the specific geological structure, the intensity of anthropopressure and the underground and exterior mining and associated infrastructure [48,49].
The geoaccumulation index (Igeo) was originally defined and used for assessing metal concentration in sediments [38,50], but it is also used here to determine the condition of the soil.
This index is calculated according to the formula:
I g e o = l o g 2 ( C n 1.5 B n ) ,
where Cn is the measured concentration of the element in the sample and B is the geochemical background of elements (for the Upper Silesia regional background level). A coefficient of 1.5 in the formula was used to reduce the variability of the geochemical background associated with lithology.
According to Müller [38], Hakanson [51], Loska et al. [52] and Barbieri [53], the Igeo for each metal is calculated and classified as uncontaminated (Igeo ≤ 0); uncontaminated to moderately contaminated (0 < Igeo ≤ 1); moderately contaminated (1 < Igeo ≤ 2); moderately to heavily contaminated (2 < Igeo ≤ 3); heavily contaminated (3 < Igeo ≤ 4); heavily to extremely contaminated (4 < Igeo ≤ 5); and extremely contaminated (Igeo ≥ 5).

2.3.1. Enrichment Factors

Heavy metal enrichment factors were calculated for averaged soil samples from each park (as mean) in relation to the background values of chemical elements in the local parent rock, selecting Fe as the reference element [43,54]:
E F = [ C m e t a l C n o r m a l i z e r ] s o i l [ C m e t a l C n o r m a l i z e r ] c o n t r o l ,
where Cmetal is the concentration of the element of interest and Cref is the concentration of reference element for normalization.
The five categories are recognized on the basis of the enrichment factor [55,56]:
EF < 2—states deficiency to minimal enrichment. EF = 2–5—moderate enrichment. EF = 5–20—significant enrichment, EF = 20–40—very high enrichment and EF > 40—extremely high enrichment.

2.3.2. Contamination Factor

The contamination factor (CF) was calculated using the equation:
C F = C n B n ,
where Cn is the element content in the soil and Bn is the background concentration same element concentration in the element.

2.3.3. Pollution Load Index

The pollution load index (PLI) was estimated based on the contamination factors according to the following formula:
P L I = C F 1 × C F 2 × C F 3 × × C F n n
where CF (contamination factor) is the contamination factor obtained by calculating between each metal’s concentration and its background value. To calculate the PLI, we used the five highest contamination factors suggested by Tomlinson et al. [39]. This index shows heavy metal contamination, and it can assume values < 1 (absence of pollution) or 1 < (existence of pollution) [39].

2.3.4. Potential Ecological Risk Index

The potential ecological risk index (RI) allows for the evaluation of the heavy metal’s impact on the environment. It was calculated using the formula:
R I = E r i
where  E r i  is the potential ecological risk factor of the specific element [57]. The  E r i  was calculated using the equation:
E r i = T r i × C F
where  T r i  is the toxic response factor of the metal given by Zhu et al. [58]. The ecological risk can be divided into the following five classes [59]: <40—low, 40 ≤  E r i  < 80—moderate, 80 ≤  E r i  < 160—considerable, 160 ≤  E r i < 320—high, 320 ≤  E r i —very high. The risk index can be classified as follows [59]:
  • RI < 150—low risk
  • 150 ≤ RI < 300—moderate risk
  • 300 ≤ RI < 600—considerable risk
  • 600 ≤ RI—very high risk.

2.3.5. Statistical Data

Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was applied to check for any association between the metals in the soil. This is the coefficient used for samples that do not meet the assumptions of normality. The statistical significance of the Spearman correlation coefficient data was determined using the Spearman rank correlation test. The exact values of the correlation coefficient were calculated for alpha = 0.001, 0.01 and 0.05 [13,60]. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics software (version 18). In addition, cluster analysis using Euclidean distance was applied.

3. Results

3.1. Physiochemical Properties of Soil

The soil analyzed in terms of physicochemical properties varied in individual anthropogenic urban forests (Table 2 and Table S1). The granulometric composition in all the samples analyzed was dominated by sand, and its average value was 83% in PSch, PD, 76% in PL and 90% in Sielecki Park (PS). A significant share of the gravel fraction (10%–16%) was found in most of the parks, with individual sites being different in terms of this fraction. The share of silt and clay in the soil samples studied varied from 2.34%–4.23% to 2.5%–2.8%, respectively (Table S1).
Soil pH varied from site to site across the parks (Table 1). The soil was characterized by a general reaction ranging from acidic (4.7-PL-2, 5.1-PK-5, PS-4 in KCl) to slightly acidic and neutral (in most sites) and rarely alkaline (7.4-PS-2.6 samples). High pH values affected the concentration of acid cations, such as H+ and Al3+. Hydrogen ranged from 0.83 to 0.76, while aluminum values varied between 0.51 and 2.11 cmol (+) kg−1. The highest contents (6.4-H+ and 12.24 Al3+) were found in PK-1. Hydrolytic acidity (Hh) varied in all studied sites, ranging from 3.27 to 6.4 cmol (+) kg−1. As with the other parameters, it varied within a given park, where different samples were analyzed (Table 2).
Analysis of the loss of ignition indicated a significant content of organic matter in the topsoil, which was undoubtedly related to the development of the park and partly fertilized materials during the organization of the park. The results were similar in all the parks studied except for Park Schöena, where the highest value was recorded (14.35%, Table 2). Organic carbon values were similar in all study points in each park, except for single samples that stood out with high levels compared to other samples in the park, e.g., PSch-1 (14.3%) and PD-1 (11.12%). The highest levels of total nitrogen (Nt) were found at sites PS-4 (0.481%), PSch-6 (0.301%) and PD-1 and PL-3 (0.271%. Table 2), respectively. The C/N ratio varied, ranging from 4 to 109. This range indicates that biological activity varied from site to site in the parks and conveys the influence of anthropogenic factors. The average content of total phosphorus (Pt) as an indicator of anthropogenic pollution of soils in the parks varied from 310 mg kg−1 (PSch) to 684 mg kg−1 (PS). Its highest values were found at site PS-4 (1840 mg kg−1) and the lowest at PK-1-96.8 mg kg−1.

3.2. Concentration of Potential Toxic Elements

The concentrations of potentially toxic metals found in the topsoil under urban forests at the different study sites vary (Table 2). The same metal was present in different contents in the same park at different study sites, which is true for almost all elements. The topsoil in all samples studied was characterized by high levels of contamination with Pb, Zn, Ba, Cd and As. Their average value for all samples from each city park is shown in Table 3. These are values that exceeded the permissible limit for this type of site. Relatively low arsenic and barium contents were recorded in Park Leśna compared to the other research sites.
The total content of Cr, Cu, Co and Ni are within the permissible limit (Table 3), and their average content for each study point is, respectively, Cr-44-68 mg kg−1, Cu-34-103 mg kg−1, Co-7-18 mg kg−1 and Ni-26-48 mg kg−1. The metals analyzed are present in different concentrations at particular sites and can be ranked as follows:
Park Sielecki (PS):Zn > Pb > Ba > Sr > Cu > Cr > As > Ni > Cd > Co
Park Schöena (PSch):Zn > Ba > Pb > Sr > Cu > Cr > Ni > As > Co > Cd
Park Kruczkowski (PK):Zn > Pb > Ba > Sr > Cu > Cr > As > Ni > Cd > Co
Park Dietla (PD):Zn > Pb > Ba > Sr > Cu > Cr > Ni > As > Cd > Co
Park Leśna (PL): Zn > Pb > Ba > Sr > Cr > Cu > Ni > As > Cd > Co

3.3. Correlation between Metals

The Spearman rank correlation tests showed correlations of heavy metal content in soils in almost all the urban parks analyzed (Table 4). Park Sielecki showed an almost complete (>0.9) statistically significant positive correlation between Ni-Cr (r = 0.934, p = <0.001), Co-Cr (r = 0.970, p = <0.001), Co-Ni (r = 0.976, p = <0.001), Sr-Cu (r = 0.929, p = <0.001), Sr-As (r = 0.905, p = <0.01). A very strong (0.8–0.9) statistically significant correlation occurred between Cu-Ni (r = 0.810, p = <0.01), Zn-Pb (r = 0.810, p = <0.01), Ba-Cr (r = 0.862, p = <0.01), Ba-Co (r = 0.857, p = <0.01), and Sr-Ni (r = 0.833, p = <0.01) (Table 4).
Correlation studies of the dependence of heavy metal content in the topsoil in PSch showed an almost complete (>0.9) statistically significant positive correlation between Ni-Cr (r = 0.905, p = <0.01), Co-Cr (r = 0.905, p = <0.01), Co-Ni (r = 0.952, p = <0.001), As-Pb (r = 0.929, p = <0.001) and Sr-Cu (r = 0.905, p = <0.01). In PK, similar patterns were also found, where correlations showed an almost complete, statistically significant positive relationship between Cu-Cr (r = 0.929, p = <0.01), Zn-Pb (r = 0.929, p = <0.01), Zn-Cd (r = 0.964, p = <0.001), Co-Ni (r = 0.929, p = <0.01), As-Pb (r = 0.964, p = <0.001), As-Zn (r = 0.964, p = <0.001), Ba-Co (r = 0.964, p = <0.001), Sr-Cu (r = 0.937, p = <0.001), Sr-Zn (r = 0.901, p = <0.01), Sr-Co (r = 0.901, p = <0.01) and Sr-Ba (r = 0.955, p = <0.001).
In Park Dietla, an almost full statistically significant positive correlation was revealed between Cd-Pb (r = 0.929, p = <0.01), Cr-Cd (r = 0.929, p = <0.01), Ni-Pb (r = 0.964, p = <0.001), Ni-Cr (r = 0.964, p = <0.001), Cu-Ni (r = 0.964, p = <0.001), Zn-Ni (r = 0.964, p = <0.001), Zn-Cu (r = 0.929, p = <0.001), Co-Pb (r = 0.964, p = <0.001), Co-Cr (r = 0.929, p = <0.001), Co-Cu (r = 0.964, p = <0.001), Co-Zn (r = 0.964, p = <0.001), Ba-Pb (r = 0.964, p = <0.001), Ba-Cr (r = 0.964, p = <0.001), Ba-Cu (r = 0.964, p = <0.001), Ba-Zn (r = 0.964, p = <0.001), Sr-Ni (r = 0.964, p = <0.001), Sr-Zn (r = 0.929, p = <0.001), Sr-Co (r = 0.964, p = <0.001) and Sr-Ba (r = 0.964, p = <0.001). In PL, a statistically significant positive relationship was found only between Zn-Cd (r = 0.918, p = <0.001) and Zn-Cu (r = 0.918, p = <0.001, Table 4).

3.4. Similarity of Metal Content in the Parks

The cluster analysis carried out using the Ward method for heavy metal contents in the chemical composition of soils in PS, PSch and Dietla. Crossing the clusters at the 3000 level showed the following three main groups of chemical elements: Group 1 (Sr, Cu, As, Ni, Cr, Co, Cd)—these elements are very similar to each other, as they form a single cluster on the dendrogram. Their contents in the soil chemical composition and properties are similar. Group 2 (Pb, Ba)—this group forms a separate cluster. This means that Pb and Ba are different from the other elements in the sample. The third group is Zn, which has the highest content in all the study sites.
For PK and PL, intersecting the clusters at the 3000 level show two main groups of elements. In the first of these, we can include PK Ba, Sr, Cu, Cr, Co, As, Ni and Cd, while we can include Zn and Pb in the second. In Park Leśna, the first group includes Ni, Sr, Cu, Cr, As, Co and Cd and the second group includes Zn, Ba and Pb.

3.5. The Risk of Potential Toxic Element Contamination

The results of the environmental geo-indicators were tabulated (Table 5) as mean values for all samples from the park and their range for individual samples. Analysis of the geoaccumulation index (Igeo) indicated that the levels of the elements studied in the soil exceeded the geochemical background limit. It can be concluded that the soil investigated was moderately contaminated, moderately to highly contaminated and strongly contaminated (with Sr and Pb). In one case, the Igeo indication for Sr was 30 (extremely contaminated).
The enrichment factor (EF) was used to assess the degree of anthropogenic influence. An increasing EF indicates an increasing proportion of anthropogenic sources. Analysis of the EF index showed that the topsoil (humus horizon) developing under the urban forest was more strongly influenced by anthropopressure. The results show that the soil was contaminated with metals to varying degrees and can be described with significant enrichment, very high enrichment and extremely high enrichment. Only sample PS-2 showed a deficiency to minimal enrichment for Cd (1.26) (Table 6).
The CF analysis further confirmed the EF results that the samples tested were not free of contamination. High levels of contamination were found for almost all elements involved. Based on the CF results, this anthropogenic ecosystem belongs to the class of soils with significant contamination to very high contamination factors. The pollutant load the index (PLI) results showed that pollutants were present at all the analyzed sites (Table 7).
The potential ecological risk for most elements was low (<40). All sites found high indications for Cd (Table 8). Elements in the moderate and considerable risk range (in some parks) included Pb, As and Cu, while those in the low risk range included Cr and Zn. The risk index assessed the pollution level and showed that only soil from Park Leśna belonged to the moderate risk class and that all remaining sites belonged to the considerable risk class.

4. Discussion

Centuries-old and contemporary anthropogenic human activities in cities significantly impact the chemical composition and morphology of soils more than natural pedogenesis. Such activities in urban areas foster a significant transformation of the natural soil cover and lead to the formation of soils with specific properties, the parameters of which depend on the intensity, direction and duration of human impact [7,62] and, therefore, cannot always be compared with other areas. The topsoil, mainly the humus horizon in parks and greeneries, is often formed using artificial material transported from outside. The urban parks analyzed in the study were established in areas transformed by mining activities [63]. This material usually contains a significant amount of organic matter, which affects soil properties such as pH value, loss on ignition and content of various elements that differ from natural settings. Long-term maintenance of parks brings about permanent changes in the properties of urban soils [64].

4.1. Variability of Basic Soil Properties

The soil reaction of the parks studied is predominantly characterized as slightly acidic to neutral (in most sites) and even alkaline (Table 1). High values influence the concentration of H+, Al3+ and the nature of hydrolytic acidity (Hh). Changes and variations in the reaction in urban parks are influenced by dissolving concrete, walls made of limestone rock and their location along traffic routes. Similar results were obtained from other urban parks regarding this type of reaction [4,9,13,62,65]. The organic matter content of these anthropogenic systems is high, according to the analysis of the loss of ignition, which is undoubtedly related to park development. Park soils are often intensively organically fertilized soils that are fertilized cyclically by the application of organic materials, such as composts, peats, horticultural soils or sewage [17,62]. The OCorg values are similar at all study points in each park, so it may be indicative of the even application of humus material to the ground surfaces and their regular fertilization [17,21,62]. The contents of Nt revealed their relation to the values of OCorg (Table 2). The C/N ratio is diverse and ranges from four to 109, which indicates that the biological activity of the soil varies depending on the site in the parks as well as the influence of many factors. Such a ratio is typical for anthropogenic soils [5,66].
The average content of total phosphorus (Pt) as an indicator of anthropogenic soil pollution in the parks is relatively similarly distributed and ranges from 310 mg kg−1 (PSch) to 1840 mg kg−1 (PS). High concentrations of Pt. were found at all sites. Bednarek et al. [47] and Charzyński et al. [6] state that P contents above 300 mg-kg−1 in soil indicate causation in various human activities. The source of this element (Pt) in urban parks is related to the fertilization and maintenance of urban greenery, organic waste accumulation, domestic sewage run-off, waste and pet feces, which are permanent features of urban parks. We can conclude that the occurrence of Pt at high concentrations in anthropogenic soils is related to human activity.

4.2. Factors Causing Spatial Variability of Potentially Toxic Elements

The amount of potentially toxic elements present in the soil environment should be considered in terms of their presence in the bedrock as a background, determining their possible accumulation in the soil [43] for natural systems. In contrast, the elevated content of potentially toxic elements in urban ecosystems is primarily related to the functioning of the city as a whole. In turn, the distribution of these elements may be due to their geochemical mobility and sorption and desorption on surface horizons [67] and in anthropogenic sources.
Emissions from fuel combustion increase lead and zinc in soils, as does heavy industry. In addition to emissions from fuel combustion, sources of trace elements include tire abrasion, oils, construction, waste disposal, metal-bearing dust, and surface runoff from surrounding streets, lubricants and leaks from batteries and damaged tanks [31] or industrial activities (mining, metallurgy and chemical engineering), construction and waste disposal, and combustion-contaminated soils and ecosystems [12,68]. Additionally, maintenance work and fertilization in parks, especially in areas planted with ornamental plants, also contribute to this phenomenon. Traffic is a significant source of aerosols containing not only toxic metals but also PAHs, i.e., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or harmful PM10 and PM2.5 [5].
Concentrations of potentially toxic metals did not always vary from site to site in the parks studied. Detailed information on the content of the analyzed elements is presented in Table 3. In almost all the parks, the contents of Pb, Cd, Zn, As, Ba and Sr exceeded the limit values adopted in Poland [61]. Arsenic and barium were exceeded at sites near the main street (PS-7-As-52 mg kg−1, PS-2.3-Ba-797 mg kg−1), where maximum values were also found (Ps-7-Cd-27.7 mg kg−1, PS-6-Pb-910 and PS-6-Zn-3526 mg kg−1) (Table 3, Figure 1). In PSch, lead (PSch-5, four times), cadmium (PSch-5, five times) and zinc (PSch-7, four times) exceeded standards at all points, with maximum values being recorded in the center of the park and along the national road (Figure 1). In this park, maximum values of As (PSch-6-38 mg kg−1) and Zn (PSch-7-2118 mg kg−1) were found in the center of the park. For Ba and Sr, the maximum values were often found along transport routes in most parks (Table 3).
In the case of PK, maximum values for lead, cadmium, zinc, arsenic, barium and strontium were found at the PK-2 test site on a residential street (Figure 1) and in the center of the park. Cd (37.3 mg kg−1, ×19; Table 3), and Pb (2040, mg kg−1 ×10, Table 3) exceeded the standards most here. Park Dielta was the most polluted area compared to the other parks and had the highest excess level of potential toxic metals (Table 3). This park is surrounded by both road and rail transport routes (Figure 1), which also affected the distribution of metals in the soil. In the PL park, the contents of heavy metals were relatively lower in all sites than in the other parks, with the exception of samples from PL-5 (Pb-659 mg kg−1, Zn-1287 mg kg−1, Cd-18.8 mg kg−1).
It should be emphasized that the parks were built in areas impacted by mining and that the subsoils of these parks contain post-mining waste. Hence, there are significant amounts of toxic elements in the topsoil compared to parks that were established on natural soils [21,69]. The variation in the occurrence of heavy metals in different regions of the world is shown in Table 9 [64,70,71,72,73], presenting several contrasting comparisons with the study area. In this area, the results obtained range from several to many times higher than in the other parks shown in the table. The potential contents of toxic substances in the soils of the parks analyzed show some similarities to the parks found in Upper Silesia (Table 9), which have a similar history of formation [37]. In all the parks, Cu, Ni, Co and Cr do not exceed the limit values and therefore do not have a negative impact on the surrounding ecosystems. Similar values for Cu have been obtained in other parks in both Europe [22,64] and the USA [71]. Numerous studies have documented also the substantial contamination of urban surface soils with Zn, Pb, Ni, Co, Cr and Cu [7,12,36,62,68,74].
The Spearman rank correlation coefficient showed the presence of a statistically significant positive correlation between the metals analyzed in all pairs (very strong correlation > 0.9: Ni-Cr, Co-Cr, Co-Ni, Sr-Cu, Sr-As, Table 4). Such a strong correlation between elements is related to their common origin and occurrence in the area. In this case, the strong and similar correlation in the parks studied is due to their location along highways, railways and historical conditions with the development of heavy industry (mining, metallurgy and chemical engineering). Excessive car traffic and low emissions are another significant source of pollution in the study region. The Igeo, EF and CF results also indirectly confirm the results indicating the occurrence and similarity of metal content in the parks obtained by the Ward method (Figure 2). Similarly, values in terms of correlation and environmental indicators (EF, CF, RI, PLI) were obtained by other authors from different regions [2,7,8,9,10,13,18,21]. Other authors [18,75,76,77] emphasize that the elemental content of potential toxic substances is influenced by the materials forming the topsoil layers. These are formed as a result of land reclamation, where the parent material is often rubble/post-industrial waste and usually covered by a 0.5 m layer of fertilized humic material from other sites. Such transported material has different physical properties.
The authors report that half of the pollution in Poland comes from transport [31], which significantly impacts the functioning of urban forests. Urban parks in Sosnowiec are located along heavily used district roads (e.g., PK, PL, PD and PS) and national roads (PK, PSch). Hence, this significantly impacts the heavy metal content of the soil in these ecosystems. The high distribution of heavy metals in the soils of this region is due to intensive mining and processing activities, especially of non-ferrous ores [45,74]. Coal, which is used in households, is also one of the pollutant carriers and contains few heavy metals. However, in the process of burning vast amounts of this raw material, especially during the heating season, a large proportion of these heavy metals is released into the atmosphere in the form of dust [78], which becomes one of the sources of heavy metals in urban ecosystems. This is related to the adsorption capacity of organic matter [67] and may also be related to potentially toxic elements from the atmosphere being accumulated by leaves [79]. The cause of lead and arsenic pollution in these and similar areas is metal-containing dust (metal-bearing dust) from the transportation of pollution from industrial and metallurgical plants [79,80].
Another source of pollution in terms of Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in urban park soils is road dust, which consists of mineral and organic particles containing metals and comes from industrial emitters, vehicles and fuel combustion. Significant amounts of zinc, copper, nickel and chromium have been found along tram and trolleybus lines in various cities in Poland [6,10,16,81]. All the parks analyzed are located in such conditions, hence the high concentrations of the aforementioned elements.
The analysis of environmental indicators like Igeo, EF, and CF confirm the degree of pollution of the urban parks in Sosnowiec as being of an anthropogenic origin. Analyses of the pollutant load index (PLI) showed that contamination was present at all the sites. The EF results indicate the presence of metal pollution to varying degrees and can be described as significant enrichment, very high enrichment and extremely high enrichment. The Igeo, and EF results obtained in the study area for Zn, Pb, Cu and Cr were often several times higher than the values for other urban parks in the world [8,82,83]. As confirmed by Nadłonek et al. [45], the occurrence of many potentially hazardous elements in the Upper Silesian region was caused by the historical mining of Zn-Pb ores, as well as zinc and iron smelting. The results of the correlation analysis confirm convincingly the co-occurrence of these elements and their accompanying elements.
The risk index (RI) provides an indication of the degree of ecological risk [84]. The RI calculated for the topsoil studied here was characterized by values ranging from 250.14 (moderate risk) to 517 (significant risk). The potential ecological risk in these classes was higher than the RI calculated on the basis of heavy metal content in urban soils studied by other authors [8,82,83].

5. Conclusions

This study of the distribution and occurrence of potentially toxic metals in urban parks shows that the areas studied are significantly contaminated with these metals. This is related, on the one hand, to the operation of the urban mining industry and land use and, on the other, to their location in city centers and along road and rail transport routes. The soil at the sites in question was characterized by a reaction ranging from weakly acidic to neutral at most of the analyzed points and contained significant amounts of OCtot., Nt and Pt, which is also related to the management and annual maintenance of the park areas. In almost all parks and study sites, the contents of Pb, Cd, Zn, As, Ba and Sr exceeded the acceptable standards for recreational areas, among which Zn, Pb and Ba showed the highest values, respectively. The geoaccumulation index (Igeo) of the soils indicates that the high concentrations of many potentially toxic metals were due to historical mining of Zn-Pb ores as well as zinc and iron smelting in the vicinity of the study area. The environmental indicators used facilitated the determination of the degree of heavy metal contamination: Igeo shows that Cd, Pb and Zn have had the highest impact on soil contamination in all the areas studied. Most of the samples studied have extremely high contents (Cd, Zn, Ba, Pb) based on EF analysis. The results of the geochemical survey and the analysis of environmental indicators show the current state of soils in selected parks in Sosnowiec and can be useful in evaluating local spatial development plans, decision-making regarding environmental conditions for the designation, as well as the use of green areas for social purposes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/f15061020/s1, Table S1: Soil grain-size composition.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.R. and A.K.; methodology, O.R.; M.R., software, M.R.; S.P.; validation, O.R. and A.K.; S.P.; formal analysis, O.R.; investigation, O.R.; A.K.; M.R.; data curation, O.R.; writing—original draft preparation, O.R.; S.P.; writing—review and editing, M.R.; supervision, O.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Upon request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive reviews, which improved the final form of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Drozdek, M.E.; Greinert, A.; Kostecki, J.; Tokarska-Osyczka, A.; Wasylewicz, R. Parki tematyczne na miejskich terenach pokopalnianych Sosnowca i Zielonej Góry. Acta Sci. Polonorum. Archit. 2017, 16, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Razzaghian, F.; Rahnama, M.R. Ecological analysis of urban parks (case study: Mashhad Metropolitan). Int. J. Appl. 2012, 2, 136–142. [Google Scholar]
  3. Breuste, J.; Haase, D.; Elmqvist, T. Urban landscapes and ecosystem services. In Ecosystem Services in Agricultural and Urban Landscapes; Sandhu, H., Wratten, S., Cullen, R., Costanza, R., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 83–104. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rahmonov, O.; Banaszek, J.; Pukowiec-Kurda, K. Relationships between heavy metal concentrations in Japanese knotweed (Reynoutria japonica Houtt.) tissues and soil in urban parks in southern Poland. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Prague, Czech Republic, 3–7 September 2018; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 221, p. 012145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Burghardt, W.; Morel, J.L.; Zhang, G.L. Development of the soil research about urban, industrial, traffic, mining and military areas (SUITMA). Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2015, 61 (Suppl. S1), 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Charzyński, P.; Hulisz, P.; Bednarek, R. (Eds.) Technogenic Soils of Poland; Polish Society of Soil Science: Toruń, Poland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  7. Prokof’eva, T.V.; Poputnikov, V.O. Anthropogenic transformation of soils in the Pokrovskoe-Streshnevo Park (Moscow) and adjacent residential areas. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2010, 43, 701–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kowalska, J.; Mazurek, R.; Gąsiorek, M.; Setlak, M.; Zaleski, T.; Waroszewski, J. Soil pollution indices conditioned by medieval metallurgical activity–A case study from Krakow (Poland). Environ. Pollut. 2016, 218, 1023–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Charzyński, P.; Plak, A.; Hanaka, A. Influence of the soil sealing on the geoaccumulation index of heavy metals and various pollution factors. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 4801–4811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zgłobicki, W.; Telecka, M.; Skupiński, S. Assessment of short-term changes in street dust pollution with heavy metals in Lublin (E Poland)—Levels, sources and risks. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 35049–35060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, T.B.; Zheng, Y.M.; Lei, M.; Huang, Z.C.; Wu, H.T.; Chen, H.; Tian, Q.Z. Assessment of heavy metal pollution in surface soils of urban parks in Beijing, China. Chemosphere 2005, 60, 542–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, G.; Sun, G.X.; Ren, Y.; Luo, X.S.; Zhu, Y.G. Urban soil and human health: A review. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2018, 69, 196–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rahmonov, O.; Środek, D.; Pytel, S.; Kupka, T.; Makieieva, N. Accumulation of heavy metals in soil and Chelidonium majus L. in an urban environment. J. Elem. 2023, 28, 1329–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Darko, G.; Dodd, M.; Nkansah, M.A.; Ansah, E.; Aduse-Poku, Y. Distribution and bioaccessibility of metals in urban soils of Kumasi, Ghana. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2017, 189, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rodríguez-Seijo, A.; Andrade, M.L.; Vega, F.A. Origin and spatial distribution of metals in urban soils. J. Soils Sediments 2017, 17, 1514–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ciupa, T.; Suligowski, R.; Kozłowski, R. Trace metals in surface soils under different land uses in Kielce city, south-central Poland. Environ. Earth Sci. 2020, 79, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Greinert, A. The heterogeneity of urban soils in the light of their properties. J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 1725–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gąsiorek, M.; Kowalska, J.; Mazurek, R.; Pająk, M. Comprehensive assessment of heavy metal pollution in topsoil of historical urban park on an example of the Planty Park in Krakow (Poland). Chemosphere 2017, 179, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sarah, P.; Zhevelev, H.M.; Atar, O.Z. Urban park soil and vegetation: Effects of natural and anthropogenic factors. Pedosphere 2015, 25, 392–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Krzyżaniak, M.; Świerk, D.; Antoszewski, P. Factors Influencing the Health Status of Trees in Parks and Forests of Urbanized Areas. Forests 2021, 12, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bakhmatova, K.A.; Matynyan, N.N.; Sheshukova, A.A. Anthropogenic soils of urban parks: A review. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2022, 55, 64–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Madrid, L.; Diaz-Barrientos, E.; Ruiz-Cortés, E.; Reinoso, R.; Biasioli, M.; Davidson, C.M.; Duarte, A.C.; Grčman, H.; Hossack, I.; Hursthouse, A.S.; et al. Variability in concentrations of potentially toxic elements in urban parks from six European cities. J. Environ. Monit. 2006, 8, 1158–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wesolek, G. Sealing of soils. In Urban Ecology; Marzluff, J.M., Shulenberger, E., Endlicher, W., Alberti, M., Bradley, G., Ryan, C., Simon, U., Zumbunnen, C., Eds.; Springer Science, Business Media LLC: Berlin, Germany, 2008; pp. 161–179. [Google Scholar]
  24. Stroganova, M.N.; Miagkova, A.D.; Prokof’eva, T.V.; Skvortsova, I.N. Soils of Moscow and Urban Environment; PAIMS Press, Lomonosov Moscow State University: Moscow, Russia, 1998; pp. 1–178. [Google Scholar]
  25. Han, N.M.M.; Latif, M.T.; Othman, M.; Dominick, D.; Mohamad, N.; Juahir, H.; Tahir, N.M. Composition of selected heavy metals in road dust from Kuala Lumpur city centre. Environ. Earth Sci. 2014, 72, 849–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rahmonov, O.; Czylok, A.; Orczewska, A.; Majgier, L.; Parusel, T. Chemical composition of the leaves of Reynoutria japonica Houtt. and soil features in polluted areas. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2014, 9, 320–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bezuglova, O.S.; Gorbov, S.N.; Tischenko, S.A.; Aleksikova, A.S.; Tagiverdiev, S.S.; Sherstnev, A.K.; Dubinina, M.N. Accumulation and migration of heavy metals in soils of the Rostov region, south of Russia. J. Soils Sediments 2016, 16, 1203–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nezat, C.A.; Hatch, S.A.; Uecker, T. Heavy metal content in urban residential and park soils: A case study in Spokane, Washington, USA. Appl. Geochem. 2017, 78, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Poňavič, M.; Wittlingerová, Z.; Čoupek, P.; Buda, J. Soil geochemical mapping of the central part of Prague, Czech Republic. J. Geochem. Explor. 2018, 187, 118–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hung, W.C.; Hernandez-Cira, M.; Jimenez, K.; Elston, I.; Jay, J.A. Preliminary assessment of lead concentrations in topsoil of 100 parks in Los Angeles, California. Appl. Geochem. 2018, 99, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Komorowski, A.; Szulc, W. Impact of traffic routes on the content of trace elements in soils in Warsaw agglomeration. Soil Sci. Annu. 2017, 68, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Karczewska, A.; Kabała, C. The soils polluted with heavy metals and arsenic in Lower Silesia-the need and methods of reclamation. Zesz. Nauk. Uniw. Przyr. We Wrocławiu Rol. 2010, 96, 59–80. [Google Scholar]
  33. Dąbkowska-Naskręt, H.; Różański, S.; Bartkowiak, A. Forms and mobility of trace elements in soils of park areas from the city of Bydgoszcz, north Poland. Soil Sci. Annu. 2016, 67, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Greinert, A.; Fruzińska, R.; Kostecki, J. Urban soils in Zielona Góra. In Technogenic Soils of Poland; Polish Society of Soil Science: Toruń, Poland, 2013; pp. 31–54. [Google Scholar]
  35. Greinert, A. Technogenic soils in Zielona Góra. In Technogenic Soils Atlas; Charzyński, P., Markiewicz, M., Świtoniak, M., Eds.; Polish Society of Soil Science: Toruń, Poland, 2013; pp. 141–164. [Google Scholar]
  36. Charzynski, P.; Bednarek, R.; Hulisz, P.; Zawadzka, A. Soils within Torun urban area. In Technogenic Soils of Poland; Polish Society of Soil Science: Torun, Poland, 2013; pp. 17–29. [Google Scholar]
  37. Łukasik, A.; Szuszkiewicz, M.; Magiera, T. Impact of artifacts on topsoil magnetic susceptibility enhancement in urban parks of the Upper Silesian conurbation datasets. J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 1836–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Müller, G. Index of geo-accumulation in sediments of the Rhine River. Geol. J. 1969, 2, 108–118. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tomlinson, D.L.; Wilson, J.G.; Harris, C.R.; Jeffrey, D.W. Problems in the assessment of heavy-metal levels in estuaries and the formation of a pollution index. Helgoländer Meeresunters. 1980, 33, 566–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Luo, X.; Yu, S.; Li, X. The mobility, bioavailability, and human bioaccessibility of trace metals in urban soils of Hong Kong. Appl. Geochem. 2012, 27, 995–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Luo, X.; Yu, S.; Zhu, Y.; Li, X. Trace metal contamination in urban soils of China. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 421–422, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Abramowicz, A.K.; Rahmonov, O. Element Cycling at Thermally Active Coal-Waste Dumps: A Case Study of Calamagrostis epigejos and Solidago canadensis. Resources 2024, 13, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kabata-Pendias, A.; Pedias, H. Biogeochemia Pierwiastków Śladowych; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  44. Łukowski, M. Koncepcja przestrzennego rozwoju miasta. In Rocznik Sosnowiecki; Gołosz, K., Ed.; Muzeum w Sosnowcu: Sosnowiec, Poland, 1999; pp. 9–27. [Google Scholar]
  45. Nadłonek, W.; Pasieczna, A.; Skreczko, S. Potentially Harmful Elements Content in Soil and Stream Sedi-ments in Southwestern Districts of Katowice (Southern Poland)–Geochemical Record of Historical Industrial Plants’ Activity. Environ. Prot. Nat. Resour. 2023, 34, 154–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Krzysztofik, R.; Rahmonov, O.; Kantor-Pietraga, I.; Dragan, W. The perception of urban forests in post-mining areas: A case study of Sosnowiec-Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bednarek, R.M.; Dziadowiec, H.; Pokojska, U.; Prusinkiewicz, Z. Badania Ekologiczno-Gleboznawcze; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Polish Scientific Press: Warszawa, Poland, 2004; p. 343. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lis, J.; Pasieczna, A.; Siwek, Z. Geochemical atlas of Poland: 1: 2.500.000; Polish Geological Institute: Warsaw, Poland, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  49. Pasieczna, A. Naturalne i antropogeniczne czynniki zanieczyszczenia gleb miejskich. Zesz. Naukowe. Górnictwo/Politech. Śląska 2003, 256, 177–184. [Google Scholar]
  50. Förstner, U. Contaminated sediments. In Lectures on Environmental Aspects of Particle-Associated Chemicals in Aquatic Systems; Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences 21; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1989; p. 155. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hakanson, L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control. A sedimentological approach. Water Res. 1980, 14, 975–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Loska, K.; Wiechuła, D.; Korus, I. Metal contamination of farming soils affected by industry. Environ. Int. 2004, 30, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Barbieri, M. The importance of enrichment factor (EF) and geoaccumulation index (Igeo) to evaluate the soil contamination. J. Geol. Geophys. 2016, 5, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wedepohl, K.H. The composition of the continental crust. Geochim. Cosmochim. 1995, 59, 1217–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Duzgoren-Aydin, N.S. Sources and characteristics of lead pollution in the urban environment of Guangzhou. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 385, 182–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sezgin, N.; Ozcan, H.K.; Demir, G.; Nemlioglu, S.; Bayat, C. Determination of heavy metal concentrations in street dusts in Istanbul E-5 highway. Environ. Int. 2003, 29, 979–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Napoletano, P.; Colombo, C.; Di Iorio, E.; Memoli, V.; Panico, S.C.; Ruggiero, A.G.; Santorufo, L.; Maisto, G.; De Marco, A. Integrated approach for quality assessment of technosols in experimental mesocosms. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhu, H.N.; Yuan, X.Z.; Zeng, G.M.; Jiang, M.; Liang, J.; Zhang, C.; Juan, Y.I.N.; Huang, H.J.; Liu, Z.F.; Jiang, H.W. Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in sediments of Xiawan Port based on modified potential ecological risk index. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2012, 22, 1470–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ahamad, M.I.; Song, J.; Sun, H.; Wang, X.; Mehmood, M.S.; Sajid, M.; Su, P.; Khan, A.J. Contamination level, ecological risk, and source identification of heavy metals in the hyporheic zone of the Weihe River, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Rahmonov, O.; Sobala, M.; Środek, D.; Karkosz, D.; Pytel, S.; Rahmonov, M. The spatial distribution of potentially toxic elements in the mountain forest topsoils (the Silesian Beskids, southern Poland). Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Journal of Laws, Item 1395, the Regulations of the Ministry of the Environment, Regarding the Assessment Method of the Pollution of the Earth’s Surface. 2016. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20160001395/O/D20161395.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2024).
  62. Greinert, A. Studia Nad Glebami Obszaru Zurbanizowanego Zielonej Góry; Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego: Zielona Góra, Poland, 2003; ISBN 978-83-7481-437-9. [Google Scholar]
  63. Różkowski, K.; Różkowski, J.; Rahmonov, O. The Historical Aspect of the Impact of Zn and Pb Ore Mining and Land Use on Ecohydrological Changes in the Area of the Biała Przemsza Valley (Southern Poland). Land 2023, 12, 997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Galušková, I.; Mihaljevič, M.; Borůvka, L.; Drábek, O.; Frühauf, M.; Němeček, K. Lead isotope composition and risk elements distribution in urban soils of historically different cities Ostrava and Prague, the Czech Republic. J. Geochem. Explor. 2014, 147, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Matinyan, N.N.; Bakhmatova, K.A.; Korentsvit, V.A. Soils of the summer garden (Saint Petersburg). Eurasian Soil Sci. 2017, 50, 637–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kusinska, A. Przemiany substancji organicznej w glebach zieleńców i parków miasta Łodzi. Rocz. Glebozn. 1991, 42, 101–107. [Google Scholar]
  67. Pokojska, U. Adsorbtion and Exchange of Cations by Forest Humus; UMK Press: Toruń, Poland, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  68. Oliver, M.A. Soil and human health: A review. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 1997, 48, 573–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rahmonov, O.; Pukowiec-Kurda, K.; Banaszek, J.; Brom, K. Floristic diversity in selected city parks in southern Poland. Environ. Prot. Nat. Resour. 2019, 30, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lee, C.S.L.; Li, X.; Shi, W.; Cheung, S.C.N.; Thornton, I. Metal contamination in urban, suburban, and country park soils of Hong Kong: A study based on GIS and multivariate statistics. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 356, 45–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Burt, R.; Hernandez, L.; Shaw, R.; Tunstead, R.; Ferguson, R.; Peaslee, S. Trace element concentration and speciation in selected urban soils in New York City. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 186, 195–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Huot, H.; Joyner, J.; Córdoba, A.; Shaw, R.K.; Wilson, M.A.; Walker, R.; Muth, T.R.; Cheng, Z. Characterizing urban soils in New York City: Profile properties and bacterial communities. J. Soils Sediments 2017, 17, 393–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dao, L.; Morrison, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, C. Influences of traffic on Pb, Cu and Zn concentrations in roadside soils of an urban park in Dublin, Ireland. Environ. Geochem. Health 2014, 36, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Różkowski, J.; Rahmonov, O.; Zarychta, R.; Zarychta, A. Environmental Transformation and the Current State of Hydrogeological Condition in the Wojkowice Area—Southern Poland. Resources 2021, 10, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chudecka, J. Characteristics of the Soil Substrate in the Anthropogenic Layer of the Oldest Part of Szczecin; University Publishing House of the West Pomeranian University of Technology: Szczecin, Poland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  76. Drozd, J. Soils of urban areas and methods of improving their fertility. In Art of Gardens in the Cityscape; Publishing House of Wroclaw University of Technology: Wroclaw, Poland, 1997; pp. 167–172. [Google Scholar]
  77. Cachada, A.; Pato, P.; Rocha-Santos, T.; da Silva, E.F.; Duarte, A.C. Levels, Sources and Potential Human Health Risks of Organic Pollutants in Urban Soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 430, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Malczyk, P.; Kedzia, W.; Nowak, M. Metale ciężkie w glebach miasta Bydgoszczy. Rocz. Glebozn. 1996, 47, 195–202. [Google Scholar]
  79. Grodzińska, K.; Szarek-Łukaszewska, G. Polish mountain forests: Past, present and future. Environ. Pollut. 1997, 98, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Donisa, C.; Mocanu, R.; Steinnes, E.; Vasu, A. Heavy metal pollution by atmospheric transport in natural soils from the northern part of eastern Carpathians. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2000, 120, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Baran, S.; Bielińska, E.J.; Kawiecka-Radomska, M. Content of heavy metals in urban park soils influenced by various anthropogenic changes. Inżynieria Sr. 2010, 137, 131–137. [Google Scholar]
  82. Markiewicz-Patkowska, J.; Hursthouse, A.; Przybyla-Kij, H. The interaction of heavy metals with urban soils: Sorption behaviour of Cd, Cu, Cr, Pb and Zn with a typical mixed brownfield deposit. Environ. Int. 2005, 31, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Birch, G.F.; Vanderhayden, M.; Olmos, M. The nature and distribution of metals in soils of the Sydney estuary catchment. Australia. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011, 216, 581–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sayadi, M.H.; Shabani, M.; Ahmadpour, N. Pollution index and ecological risk of heavy metals in the surface soils of Amir-Abad Area in Birjand City, Iran. Health Scope 2015, 4, e21137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the area studied against the background of Poland and Sosnowiec city: (A)—Park Kruczkowski, (B)—Park Leśny (Kuronia), (C)—Park Schöena, (D)—Park Sielecki, (E)—Park Dietla and 1–11—location of sampling points.
Figure 1. Location of the area studied against the background of Poland and Sosnowiec city: (A)—Park Kruczkowski, (B)—Park Leśny (Kuronia), (C)—Park Schöena, (D)—Park Sielecki, (E)—Park Dietla and 1–11—location of sampling points.
Forests 15 01020 g001
Figure 2. Hierarchical dendrogram for ten potential toxic elements obtained by cluster analysis.
Figure 2. Hierarchical dendrogram for ten potential toxic elements obtained by cluster analysis.
Forests 15 01020 g002
Table 1. General features of the urban parks studied in Sosnowiec.
Table 1. General features of the urban parks studied in Sosnowiec.
Names
of Park
Park Area [ha]Year of CreationGeographical
Coordinates
Ecological
Function
Soil TypesNumber of SamplesHistory
Park Sielecki (PS)10.4183550°17′6″ N 19°8′28″ EEcological, sport and recreation, economic, culture and entertainmentFluvic Cambisol, Hortic Anthrosol24Established as a private palace park, open to the public since 1945.
Park Dietla (PD)6.13189050°17′8″ N 19°8′10″ EEcological, sport and recreationHortic Anthrosol, Technic Anthrosol21Established as a palace walk park in a former deciduous forest, the sports infrastructure was built in the 1970s.
Park Schöena (PSch)5.5188550°17′59″ N 19°8′35″ EPalace and park complex, culture and entertainmentFluvic Cambisol, Hortic Anthrosol21Neo-Romanesque palace−garden park
Park
Kruczkowski (PK)
4.8193550°16′53″ N 19°6′14″ EEcological and recreation, biodiversity park Urbic Technosol21Established as a dendrological garden, now an ecological center with an Exotarium.
Park Leśna (PL)48195850°18′5″ N 19°14′26″ E Ecological, sport and recreation, culture and entertainmentTechnic Anthrosol, Fluvic Cambisol33Created on the site of a former sand quarry and later reclaimed as a forest park.
Table 2. Physical and chemical properties of urban soils in the Sosnowiec area.
Table 2. Physical and chemical properties of urban soils in the Sosnowiec area.
Urban Parks NamesSampling PointspHHhH+Al3+Loss on
Ignation
CorgNtC/NPt
H2OKCl[cmol (+) kg−1][%] [mg kg−1]
Park Sielecki (PS)S-16.86.32.760.720.163.351.850.18110272.4
S-27.47.23.61.020.17.613.110.31210551
S-36.25.73.120.580.810.694.820.18426946
S-45.75.16.160.540.0711.995.560.481121840
S-56.66.13.481.962.047.213.750.12530250.8
S-67.36.62.720.540.423.122.290.3227978
S-77.16.42.520.940.4811.796.490.09171105.2
S-86.96.31.840.690.048.814.530.22320535
Park Schöena (PSch)PSch-16.76.10.60.40.431.0814.30.131109320.1
PSch-26.56.119.64.15.613.035.820.17234281.6
PSch-36.86.77.53.64.75.233.290.13225197.6
PSch-47.26.61.70.610.47.672.520.08131114.8
PSch-55.85.35.41.70.99.563.480.21116514.1
PSch-66.66.17.80.310.118.296.450.30121390.1
PSch-77.16.62.20.720.215.636.540.12453356
Park Kruczkowski (PK)PK-17.16.496.412.247.394.220.1423096.8
PK-26.96.242.121.727.185.170.1147107.2
PK-36.45.81.680.610.1613.218.470.18446360
PK-46.45.91.160.280.0410.655.070.07171209.6
PK-55.85.13.040.680.095.795.520.13142538
PK-67.16.61.040.140.119.184.660.042111260.8
PK-76.55.48.040.840.413.831.190.28141252
Park Dietla (PD)PD-16.35.52.720.320.0221.7211.120.27141575
PD-26.66.17.484.62.969.425.290.14237157
PD-37.36.92.61.180.863.541.770.03157165.2
PD-45.95.33.881.660.984.624.110.012343218.8
PD-56.35.55.081.642.12.70.990.1328232.2
PD-67.06.41.120.060.029.275.790.10157529
PD-75.85.38.242.923.087.313.760.2118347
Park Leśna (PL)PL-15.55.020.550.584.614.330.16127294.4
PL-25.34.71.640.530.099.135.90.13245353
PL-35.65.02.640.780.65.733.870.27114800
PL-47.26.72.280.510.078.684.980.18227882
PL-55.45.13.481.311.0312.948.660.09195162.4
PL-65.34.84.441.61.248.452.590.15217404
PL-74.74.21.080.320.268.014.170.08450233.6
PL-85.95.35.82.562.444.611.550.02174178.8
PL-96.45.85.283.280.66.083.510.12129209.6
PL-105.14.73.320.60.177.754.590.26118432
PL-116.96.44.561.080.647.743.610.20118878
Table 3. The concentration of potential toxic elements in the parks analyzed.
Table 3. The concentration of potential toxic elements in the parks analyzed.
Urban
Parks
Sampling PointsLimit Values [61]
2002200150200500502540010–30 [43]
PbCdCrNiCuZnCo AsBaSr
mg kg−1
Park Sielecki (PS)S-1410.72.03114.115.09975.41437755
S-2669.17.27146.997.1233817.033606147
S-3624.519.35732.381.3223712.434797105
S-4399.519.14018.745.39817.12037870
S-5338.110.64019.680.813157.22436773
S-6910.89.33919.449.435266.73236275
S-7717.827.75030.163.9272711.45254196
S-8255.817.35426.438.9107711.31848667
Mean values540.814.14825.959.019009.82848986
Park Schöena (PSh)PSch-1387.714.17896.7186.5204836.7321137391
PSch-2213.34.78847.363.286316.615550106
PSch-3285.410.84322.053.110567.61935268
PSch-4538.212.67245.6117.7178116.734635111
PSch-5865.021.07142.482.0188016.441660104
PSch-6585.117.25943.1107.1211216.238572117
PSch-7565.116.26639.8112.8211814.927580136
Mean values 491.413.86848.1103.2169417.929641148
Park Kruczkowski (PK)PK-1426.415.05135.465.6175713.92549299
PK-22040.337.36944.1105.2310314.668643129
PK-32019.124.47032.589.0182711.340513109
PK-41913.429.05933.179.2262510.95048499
PK-5894.518.84122.751.914298.23744676
PK-6343.79.35423.571.59977.71132977
PK-7156.83.84720.228.94185.61023844
Mean values 1113.519.75630.270.2173710.33444990
Park Dietla (PD)PD-11102.425.68875.2209.0275928.337878210
PD-2796.122.47240.0113.0215312.225610120
PD-3280.39.43719.548.211616.92238677
PD-4352.210.14125.246.412438.72943971
PD-5323.511.13818.337.310445.92138264
PD-6905.429.78553.9126.8335120.058670139
PD-7493.313.44927.950.712769.81947791
Mean values607.617.45937.190.2185513.130549110
Park Leśna (PL)PL-1150.33.027131.117.42494.5724847
PL-2510.514.54622.341.010358.02341475
PL-3255.18.25018.837.46166.91631158
PL-4128.82.86130.134.750710.0839087
PL-5659.318.45326.453.112879.02445084
PL-6264.26.23713.827.94944.81337560
PL-7228.75.54014.821.83524.71439062
PL-8449.211.73216.131.98777.01634566
PL-9245.08.56723.838.99009.62048683
PL-10541.813.74622.542.79949.52548387
PL-11208.010.43016.330.56806.61335175
Mean values 331.09.44430.634.37267.31638671
Table 4. Correlation between metals within the urban parks analyzed.
Table 4. Correlation between metals within the urban parks analyzed.
Park Sielecki (PS)PbCdCrNiCuZnCoAsBaSr
Pb1.000
Cd0.0001.000
Cr−0.0120.3591.000
Ni0.2380.3330.934 ***1.000
Cu0.3570.1900.683 *0.810 **1.000
Zn0.810 **0.0950.2280.5240.5481.000
Co0.1190.4050.970 ***0.976 ***0.786 *0.3571.000
As0.667 *0.5480.5390.738 *0.786 *0.762 *0.690 *1.000
Ba0.0710.4520.862 **0.786 *0.5000.0710.857 **0.5241.000
Sr0.6190.2620.6830.833 **0.929 ***0.7140.7860.905 **0.5711.000
Park Schöena (PSch)
Pb1.000
Cd0.6191.000
Cr−0.095−0.3331.000
Ni−0.024−0.2860.905 **1.000
Cu0.452−0.0710.5480.667 *1.000
Zn0.762 *0.524−0.0480.0950.643 *1.000
Co0.095−0.1900.905 **0.952 ***0.738 *0.1191.000
As0.929 ***0.5480.0240.1670.5240.6190.3101.000
Ba0.5710.2860.6190.643 *0.833 **0.5710.786 *0.667 *1.000
Sr0.357−0.1190.5000.643 *0.905 **0.714 *0.5950.3330.6671.000
Park Kruczkowski (PK)
Pb1.000
Cd0.9641.000
Cr0.714 *0.6431.000
Ni0.679 *0.714 *0.6071.000
Cu0.857 **0.821 *0.929 **0.750 *1.000
Zn0.929 **0.964 ***0.714 *0.857 **0.857 **1.000
Co0.786 *0.750 *0.5710.929 **0.714 *0.857 **1.000
As0.964 ***1.0000.6430.714 *0.821 *0.964 ***0.750 *1.000
Ba0.893 **0.821 *0.714 *0.857 **0.821 *0.893 **0.964 ***0.821 *1.000
Sr0.865 **0.811 *0.865 **0.883 **0.937 ***0.901 **0.901 **0.811 *0.955 ***1.000
Park Dietla (PD)
Pb1.000
Cd0.929 **1.000
Cr1.0000.929 **1.000
Ni0.964 ***0.857 **0.964 ***1.000
Cu0.893 **0.821 *0.893 **0.964 ***1.000
Zn0.929 **0.893 **0.929 **0.964 ***0.929 **1.000
Co0.964 ***0.857 **0.964 ***1.0000.964 ***0.964 ***1.000
As0.6430.5710.6430.679 *0.6070.714 *0.679 *1.000
Ba0.964 ***0.857 **0.964 ***1.0000.964 ***0.964 ***1.0000.679 *1.000
Sr0.893 **0.821 *0.893 **0.964 ***1.0000.929 **0.964 ***0.6070.964 ***1.000
Park Leśna (Pl)
Pb1.000
Cd0.864 ***1.000
Cr0.1780.1231.000
Ni−0.182−0.0640.3601.000
Cu0.700 **0.745 **0.697 **0.3181.000
Zn0.764 **0.918 ***0.4600.1640.918 ***1.000
Co0.2450.3180.811 **0.4360.782 **0.655 *1.000
As0.868 ***0.849 ***0.462−0.0050.863 ***0.872 ***0.5021.000
Ba0.4330.4460.680 *0.1820.692 **0.647 **0.697 **0.682 *1.000
Sr0.2510.3880.600 *0.3610.699 **0.644 **0.872 ***0.4840.780 **1.000
*** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.
Table 5. The geoaccumulation index (*Igeo) of heavy metals within the urban soil studied.
Table 5. The geoaccumulation index (*Igeo) of heavy metals within the urban soil studied.
Sites BaSrCrZnNiCuCo PbAsCd
PSMean2.462.671.992.781.522.121.702.321.652.22
Range2.03–3.172.02–3.441.36–2.561.82–3.670.64–2.380.15–2.840.84–2.51.24–3.070.64–2.53−0.58–3.2
PSchMean2.853.452.502.612.412.932.572.181.702.20
Range1.99–3.682.33–30.31.84–2.871.64–2.931.28–3.421.97–3.781.34–3.610.98–30.73–2.18−0.64–2.51
PKMean2.342.742.212.651.742.371.783.361.932.71
Range1.42–2.861.7–3.251.77–2.540.59–3.491.16–2.291.09–2.960.91–2.280.53–4.230.15–2.910.34–3.63
PDMean2.633.032.872.742.042.742.122.491.742.53
Range2.1–3.312.24–3.591.62–2.871.91–3.61.02–3.061.46–3.950.97–3.271.37–3.351.07–2.681.64–3.3
PLMean2.122.401.881.391.761.341.281.610.851.64
Range1.48–2.451.79–2.681.32–2.48−0.14–2.220.61–3.860.36–1.970.58–1.730.25–2.6−0.36–1.47−0.09–2.73
* 0—uncontaminated, 0–1—uncontaminated to moderately, 1–2—moderately, 2–3—moderately to strongly, 3–4—strongly, 4–5—strongly to extremely strongly, >5—extremely contaminated.
Table 6. The enrichment factor (*EF) of heavy metals within the urban soil studied.
Table 6. The enrichment factor (*EF) of heavy metals within the urban soil studied.
Sites BaSrCrZnNiCuCoPbAsCd
PSMean37.1242.7726.7246.2219.3429.3221.9533.624.7231.47
Range27.46–60.4727.35–73.1217.34–39.7323.86–85.7810.52–34.997.46–48.2912.08–38.0515.9–56.6310.52–38.791.26–62
PSchMean48.6273.438.1341.2135.951.334030.5529.9530.89
Range26.7–86.2733.82–194.4924.06–49.2420.99–51.5316.41–72.1526.41–92.7617.01–82.1413.26–53.7811.19–30.5910.52–47
PKMean34.944.9731.2542.2522.5434.923.0769.2325.6843.98
Range18.05–48.7821.88–64.1622.94–39.1710.17–75.4915.07–32.914.37–52.3212.53–32.689.74–126.867.46–50.738.5–83.49
PDMean41.6454.8532.7745.1327.7144.8629.3437.7722.4838.9
Range28.98–66.6231.83–104.4520.7–49.2425.4–81.5313.65–56.118.55–103.9613.2–63.3417.42–68.5414.17–43.2721.04–66.48
PLMean29.2635.4524.8717.6722.7817.0616.3820.5812.1320.92
Range18.81–36.8423.37–43.2715.1–37.496.05–31.3110.29–97.818.65–26.4110.07–22.388–40.995.22–18.656.26–41.18
*EF < 2—deficiency to minimal enrichment. EF > 2–5—moderate, EF > 5–20—significant, EF> 20–40—very high and EF > 40—extremely high enrichment.
Table 7. * Contamination factor (CF) and pollution load index for study sites.
Table 7. * Contamination factor (CF) and pollution load index for study sites.
Sites BaSrCrZnNiCuCoPbAsCdPLI
PSMean8.299.555.9610.324.326.554.97.514.727.038.45
PSchMean10.8616.398.519.28.0211.468.936.824.96.911.09
PKMean7.6110.046.989.435.037.795.1515.465.739.8210.23
PDMean9.0312.257.3210.86.1910.026.558.435.028.6910
PLMean6.537.915.553.945.093.813.664.592.714.675.84
* CF < 1—low contamination, 1–3—moderate contamination, 3–6—considerable contamination <6—very high contamination factor.
Table 8. Potential ecological risk factor and potential ecological risk index for the heavy metals analyzed (mean values).
Table 8. Potential ecological risk factor and potential ecological risk index for the heavy metals analyzed (mean values).
CrZnNiCuPbAsCdRI **
T r i  *215551030
PS11.9310.3221.6132.7537.5547.28210.9372.59
PSch17.039.2140.157.3334.1249.03207414.06
PK13.969.4325.1738.9877.3257.36294.75517.23
PD14.6410.0830.9550.1042.1850.23260.7459.2
PL11.113.9425.4519.0522.9827.11140.25250.14
* Toxic response factor given by Zhu et al. [58]. ** RI < 150—low risk, 150 ≤ RI < 300—moderate risk, 300 ≤ RI < 600—considerable risk, 600 ≤ RI—very high risk.
Table 9. Total content of PTMs in some park soils in different cities (mean and range values, median in parentheses).
Table 9. Total content of PTMs in some park soils in different cities (mean and range values, median in parentheses).
City, ParksPbZnCdCuAsCoReference
Parks in Sosnowiec (5)617158215712858Current study
Toruń urban area, Poland25.2323.750.1511.8n.a.n.a.[9]
Zielona Góra, Poland85.22930.5833n.a.n.a.[34]
Parks in Katowice, Poland2705904.430n.a.7.0
Parks in Zabrze, Poland67.52501.9813.5n.a.4.1[37]
Parks in Dąbrowa Gornicza, Poland2706609.221n.a.4.1[37]
Parks in Tarnowskie Góry, Poland93013909.022.0n.a.6.0[37]
New York, City Parks
(Central, Pelham Bay Park, Van Cortland Park
40–73019–300 (81)0.1–3 (0.4)14–138 (46)1–46 (13)3–13 (7)[71]
Soundview Park, NYC160–1049184–792-48–529--[72]
City Park ins Hong Kong, China7.7–496 (70)23–930 (781)0.11–1.361.3–277 (10.4)-0.6–10.9[70]
Phoenix Park, Dublin, Ireland3994-25-- [73]
Parks in Ostrava (9), Czech Republic27–125 (49)78–922 (151)0.3–2.418–175 (38)8–187–10[64]
Prague urban parks (13), Czech Republic22–21363–2850.2–0.116–8811–3110–17[64]
Alexandra Park, Glasgow, United Kingdom114–414 (179)67–305 (104)n.a.33–113 (59)n.a.n.a.[22]
Glasgow Green Park, Glasgow (Great Britain)98–676 (279)102–377 (174)n.a24–113 (88)n.a.n.a.[22]
Tivoli Park, Ljubljana39–225 (72)84–300 (103)n.a.21–78 (31)n.a.n.a.[22]
Valention Park, Turin, Italy68–257 (137)116 (317)n.a.44–123 (83)n.a.n.a.[22]
Galitos Park, Aveiro, Portugal7–38 (20)18–82 (49)n.a8–61 (16)n.an.a[22]
Los Principes Park, Seville (Spain)43–247 (100)73–191 (99)n.a.30–72 (47)n.a.n.a.[22]
Stadsträdgarden. Uppsala, Sweden7–116 (36)27–193 (106)n.a.8–90 (31)n.a.n.a.[22]
Moscow, Russia74.258.20.324.1n.an.a[24]
Hannover, Germany1721861.252n.an.a[23]
Debrecen, Hungary10.367.7<17.1n.an.a[9]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rahmonov, O.; Kowal, A.; Rahmonov, M.; Pytel, S. Variability of Concentrations of Potentially Toxic Metals in the Topsoil of Urban Forest Parks (Southern Poland). Forests 2024, 15, 1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15061020

AMA Style

Rahmonov O, Kowal A, Rahmonov M, Pytel S. Variability of Concentrations of Potentially Toxic Metals in the Topsoil of Urban Forest Parks (Southern Poland). Forests. 2024; 15(6):1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15061020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rahmonov, Oimahmad, Agnieszka Kowal, Małgorzata Rahmonov, and Sławomir Pytel. 2024. "Variability of Concentrations of Potentially Toxic Metals in the Topsoil of Urban Forest Parks (Southern Poland)" Forests 15, no. 6: 1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15061020

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop