1. Introduction
Almost one-quarter of the total land area is covered by forests globally [
1]. This constitutes both natural forests and artificially regenerated forests. Realizing the fact that forest vegetation and forest soils are viable sinks of atmospheric carbon and can significantly mitigate global climate change [
2,
3,
4,
5], regardless of their mode of regeneration, the concern of global communities regarding forest ecosystems has increased. Additionally, these terrestrial ecosystems offer numerous benefits, such as improving soil fertility, ecosystems, and biodiversity, which in turn lead to a series of other positive outcomes [
3,
5,
6,
7] benefitting people and the planet. A large chunk of global forests are natural; however, their conversion to arable land and other types of land uses has resulted in the shrinkage of these areas day by day [
1,
8]. In response, humans started to regenerate forests through artificial approaches, for example, plantation forests. The global area of planted forests surged from 167.5 million hectares to 277.9 million hectares between 1990 and 2015, with Pine species predominantly utilized, especially in temperate and boreal zones [
9,
10]. Despite constituting diverse physiographic and climatic variation associated with social and environmental benefits, constituting approximately 8.45% of the total forested area, 16.2% of stem density, and 3.8% of trees with an 11.62 m
3 ha
−1 stem volume [
11], the potential benefits from this single species compared with adjacent natural forests have not been properly illustrated in the changing world from social and environmental perspectives.
Following global trends, Nepal’s forest cover was estimated at 5.96 million hectares in the latest assessment—almost 45% of the country’s land mass, marking a significant increase from the past record [
12]. Plantation forests have played a key role in this expansion, with around 370,000 hectares established since the 1980s, largely dominated by Pine species [
13]. Among all the forest cover including planted forests, over one-third of Nepal’s forests are managed by local communities, with 97% being naturally regenerated and the remaining 3% planted as community forests (CFs) [
14]. Local communities, with the support of the government and donors, were devoted to planting Pine, especially
Pinus roxburghii, across the Mid Hills area due to its multiple benefits and wide range of distribution. These benefits include but are not limited to a wide range of adaptability in the new environment for forest restoration and the control of soil erosion [
15], a wide range of distributions beyond Nepal from Bhutan, Myanmar, Sikkim, and Tibet from the east to Nepal, India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan on the west along the Hindu-Kush Himalayas foothills, and one of the largest elevation ranges from 450 m to 2700 m, mostly in south-facing dry areas [
15]. The species forms 1 of the 12 ecoregions in Nepal [
16,
17] and is a major forest type in subtropical regions [
11]. After the energy crisis of the 1970s in Nepal, following the Theory of the Himalayas’ Environmental Degradation [
18], plenty of plantation work started and it became the most widely planted species during the 1980s and subsequent decades in Nepal [
15]. This plantation effort supplemented the demand for construction timber for house-building, wood fuel demands, and bedding materials for livestock to harness social needs [
13,
15]. Recently, resin extracted from Pine has a growing market, offering high economic returns to forest owners and the government through revenue generation in subtropical countries like Nepal and India [
19]. As a result, a recent national forest assessment report highlighted several important production and conversion assets concerning
P. roxburghii regarding harnessing societal needs as well as meeting environmental challenges like carbon offsetting [
17]. To realize these benefits, it is crucial to assess the time-based biomass estimation and optimize the economic, social, and environmental benefits. Yet, it is uncertain whether these benefits will be perpetual for any type of forest, including planted Pine. This can be achieved by analyzing and comparing forest structures at the existing stage to plan scenarios for both types of forests, regenerated naturally or planted, to inform future planning and optimize the social and environmental benefits for sustainability. For this, as a proxy measure, above-ground biomass is useful for comparing the structural and functional attributes of forest ecosystems across a wide range of environmental setups [
20].
Several studies have employed different methodologies to determine the age of standing trees and subsequent interrelationships. Some of these studies used a ring count via destructive sampling techniques [
21], coring using Pressler’s borer [
22,
23], a radiometric scanner [
24], or tomography [
25,
26]. If a forest is dominated by
Pinus, the approximate age of the stands can be found by counting the whorls of branches [
15]. However, this technique is not scientific since the pure
Pinus stand, in most cases, performs self-pruning of its branches, which hinders the whorls for accurate counting [
27]. Furthermore, destructive techniques, radiometric scanners, or tomography are, of course, more accurate than the conventional whorls counting method. However, these tools and techniques are relatively demanding regarding time, effort, technology, and resources [
28]. Coring is one of the established techniques that readily facilitates the determination of the age of standing trees without causing significant damage to trees regarding their future growth. Also, radial growth and wood density are important traits in assessing wood quality [
29], which can be obtained from coring samples. Coring samples allow for the determination of the mentioned quality and growth components among many other aspects of the environment [
28]. Despite having several high-tech infrared and radio wave-based tools and techniques in place to identify the age and quality assurance of wood in trees using software and a flat-bed scanner [
30], there are limitations of tools and techniques in Nepal due to the limited coverage of many types of research in many areas and ecological data management [
31]. Past research also highlighted time-based production, especially for Pine species across the Himalayas regions [
32], providing an effective strategy using the dendrochronological technique in species [
24,
28] like
P. roxburghii for estimating biomass and carbon storage in forests for management planning [
32]. Realizing the benefits and minimizing the negative consequences, we utilize coring tools to estimate the age (time-based production) to assess the quality of wood production in addition to determining the rotation and productivity of the forests [
33] and measuring other physical dimensions of the standing Pine trees in this study. However, estimating the age of natural forests is challenging, so we performed our estimations by interpolating the diameter at breast height (DBH) with the total tree height, as suggested by Jackson (1994) [
15].
Numerous studies worldwide have addressed biomass and carbon estimation, as well as monitoring and assessment issues concerning forest ecosystems. These include the estimation of biomass in Australian Eucalyptus forests [
34] and Indian humid tropical forests [
35], environmental assessment using tree rings in France [
33], the growth response to climate change in Chinese forests [
36], and carbon concerning REDD+ in Latin American countries [
37]. Similarly, in Nepal, studies cover a wide range of aspects such as ecosystem services [
31], carbon-to-soil properties, and REDD+ concerns [
38,
39]. However, there is a lack of research comparing planted and natural forests regarding ecological sustainability and biomass production potential. Further, forest sustainability largely depends on regeneration conditions, plant density, age or size (or class) gradation, biomass accumulation, forest conditions that optimize biomass production, biodiversity management, and incentives from carbon financing mechanisms or other means, which are yet to assess the most widely planted Pine versus natural mixed forests in a contagious landscape under a similar management system (i.e., in CFs).
In this study, we endeavor to comprehend the social and environmental benefits of planted Pine forests and natural mixed forests from sustainability perspectives. Specifically, the study aims to compare the community structure and characteristics of mixed forests and planted Pine forests in the same environment by utilizing several variables of production potential frontiers to harness societal needs and environmental sustainability in the contemporary changing world. The results of this research will contribute to the comparative ecological knowledge of Pine plantations and natural forests. This study offers crucial insights into ensuring ecological sustainability, addressing climate change, and promoting sustainable forest management. The findings have global applicability, informing forest management decisions for both plantation and natural forests in the face of increasing socio-economic demands and environmental challenges.
4. Discussion
Assessing forest structures and attributes is essential for sustainable forest management. Comparing forests based on their mode of regeneration under similar socio-environmental conditions offers pathways to optimize benefits for both people and the ecosystem. In summary, this study offers insights into managing both planted and natural forests to maximize societal and environmental benefits for Nepal and beyond.
4.1. Planted Pine Forest and Its Sustainability Perspective
Our findings reveal that despite their higher biomass and carbon sequestration, planted Pine forests exhibit unimodal stand structures, indicating a lack of age gradation. This undermines sustainable production, necessitating human interventions. Silvicultural practices like intermediate thinning, canopy opening, and promoting natural regeneration can enhance growth rates by reducing resource competition, facilitating recruitment, and tapping resin for additional economic returns. However, challenges such as the absence of natural regeneration, frequent fires, and the high risk of soil erosion limit the societal benefits of fuelwood, timber, and bedding materials, offering little support for plant and wildlife diversity, thus hindering the long-term sustainability of artificial forests.
Plantation forests initially exhibit higher biomass density and have the potential for greater carbon sequestration than natural forests in the short term (5 to 10 years) under various scenarios. However, the absence of regeneration in
Pinus plantation areas suggests limited potential for long-term biomass increase, despite initial predictions. The mean stand age in our study was 24 years, with a recommended rotation period of 45 years for
P. roxburghii [
13]. However, to maximize product volume, final felling at 30–35 years is recommended for plantation areas in Nepal. Over time, the lack of regeneration and minimal undergrowth due to frequent fires, dense canopy cover, and acidic
Pinus needles will further reduce the carbon sink potential in these forests. Intensive management practices such as canopy opening, thinning, pruning, needle collection, enrichment planting, and promoting natural seed germination are necessary to maintain a continuous forest structure. However, these forests may not achieve other ecosystem services. These findings are valuable for the 3% of planted forest area in Nepal [
14] or the entire forest area in the country (44.74%) [
17] and globally [
8], contributing to sustainable forest management to ensure continuous ecosystem services.
The analysis reveals a bell-shaped distribution of DBH, total height, biomass, and age in the planted forest, indicating a dominant pole-size stand structure. This structural complexity highlights the forest’s naturalness [
55]. However, this unimodal structure suggests an unstable population, hindering long-term sustainability. In contrast, other forests in Nepal typically exhibit a reversed J-shape DBH distribution, indicating a continuous population structure [
12,
17]. This homogenous stand structure impedes regeneration and tree size diversity, compromising sustainability [
7]. In plantation forests, biomass stock is expected to decrease significantly over time due to the bell-shaped DBH distribution and challenges such as minimal regeneration, acidic
Pinus needles, and frequent fires hindering natural regeneration. Consequently, the future potential of
Pinus plantations as carbon sinks diminishes. Similar findings from northeast India suggest higher biomass density in plantation forests compared to natural forests, attributed to uniform stand structure, fast-growing
Pinus species, and management practices like pruning and thinning [
35]. The higher biomass density in the plantation stand compared to the natural forests may be attributed to a more uniform stand structure resulting from site factors, species characteristics (fast-growing
Pinus), and adapted management practices (such as pruning). Silvicultural management interventions are essential for intermittent material returns and economic benefits for forest-dependent communities. Intermediate thinning, for example, can enhance growth rates, carbon sequestration, latewood proportion, and ring average density [
29]. Given the strong positive correlation between DBH and other variables, this unimodal distribution characterizes biomass and carbon in the study area. Forest management strategies must integrate the maintenance of crucial structural components and patterns into timber production to support biodiversity conservation and sustainable forestry [
55].
The plantation stand is expected to have greater potential for carbon sequestration in the short term, assuming consistent conditions. However, factors such as the absence of natural regeneration, limited undergrowth due to frequent fires, dense canopy cover, and the acidic nature of Pinus needles hinder its long-term carbon sink potential. Intensive management practices like canopy opening, thinning, pruning, and needle removal are necessary for plantation stands to reduce the environmental risk including bushfires [
27]. Despite these efforts, weaknesses in plantation forests may pose less concern for carbon emission reductions and Emissions Trading through mechanisms like REDD+ due to the need for long-term continuity and climate change mitigation [
5,
32,
56]. This makes them a potentially low priority for the carbon market and REDD+ scenarios [
2,
37]. To qualify for this Emissions Trading (ET) mechanism, plantation forests, especially Pine, have two options: either convert to natural broadleaved forests in the next rotation period or maintain age (size) gradation through systematic planting at intervals or the promotion of natural regeneration of the same species through community-driven silvicultural operations [
38].
Further, examining the tree rings in Pine trees provides an opportunity to assess past environmental catastrophes and improve future planning. Age assessment helps determine the rotation period of forest stands and identify significant environmental changes. Various types of false rings indicate major environmental disturbances [
24,
57]. However, our study did not find such false rings in
Pinus. Verification with local elders during field visits confirmed that they had not experienced notable environmental adversities, such as prolonged drought or severe frost, in their lifetimes. Thus, periodic assessments of tree rings provide insights for environmental disaster planning [
32] and are, therefore, suggested for future research as well.
4.2. Natural Mixed Forest and Its Sustainability Perspective
Unlike planted Pine forests, naturally regenerated forests demonstrate a gradual process of carbon capture (biomass generation), offering fewer immediate prospects for rapid economic transformation but providing significant social benefits. These benefits include fodder and fuelwood, grazing opportunities, less bushfire risk, and reduced soil erosion due to multistory canopy coverage and ground cover by ferns and grasses. Additionally, they provide poles for domestic use by local communities. Naturally regenerated forests exhibit a consistent age class distribution, minimal fire incidents, abundant regeneration, greater biodiversity, and lower regeneration costs. However, they still require some artificial intervention to optimize societal and environmental benefits, such as the potential of REDD+ for compensating improved forest management, biodiversity conservation, and reducing the gap in social demand for forest products and services.
From a biomass growth perspective, particularly in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration, natural regenerated forests have a greater potential to sequester carbon due to the abundance of younger trees and natural regeneration, where good regeneration ensures the forest ecosystem’s sustainability. Consistent with this finding, studies reported that old-growth forests have less potential for carbon sequestration as older trees cease to grow [
8,
58,
59]. Beyond maturity, trees generally have marginal carbon sequestration capability [
38,
60]. However, small trees in naturally regenerated forests enhance future carbon stock due to their high sequestration potential [
5,
35]. Therefore, improved management practices are needed to maintain a fixed proportion of density or size classes, as suggested by past studies for both types of forests [
13,
61]. Community forests with many smaller trees can significantly reduce emissions, as these trees grow and add carbon as biomass. Simple management practices can maintain a balanced number of trees of different sizes, ensuring a perpetual carbon sink and sustainable material returns [
38].
The stock number density is higher in natural forests than in plantation forests. Our regression analysis shows that biomass growth does not match estimates from allometric equations. The wide variation in structure and composition, higher plant density leading to resource competition, and the presence of slow-growing trees in natural forests contribute to lower biomass density. In contrast, naturally regenerated forests exhibit a slow and steady increase in biomass density, offering a high potential for carbon sequestration. These forests provide better options for sustainable forest management and maintain size gradations. They have greater coverage and lower regeneration costs, offering multiple benefits beyond carbon emission reduction through the Emissions Trading (ET) mechanism under REDD+ [
5,
60]. Numerous studies indicate that implementing REDD+ could provide crucial compensation to forest users for adopting improved management practices, either alone or with other economic incentives [
37]. This approach would elevate REDD+ to a top priority for financing forest conservation and sustainable forest management in developing countries [
59]. Considering the findings on carbon sequestration in soil, minimal disturbance to the forest soil and prevention of land-use changes are recommended.
Overall, our study aimed to estimate the age of forest stands, both naturally regenerated and artificially planted, to project time-based forest goods production for scenario planning. We collected data from two community-managed forests in the mid-hills of Nepal. However, we acknowledge limitations in comparing natural Pine forests with natural mixed forests across various geographical regions, which could be explored in future research. Additionally, we recognize the influence of local and indigenous preferences on species selection for both societal and commercial purposes, though our focus was primarily on the sustainability of forest stands. We assessed factors such as biomass production, age distribution, soil erosion, ground cover, risk of bushfires, and species diversity. Numerous other variables could be explored in future studies to compare planted and naturally regenerated forest stands from social, economic, and environmental perspectives. Nonetheless, our findings serve as a valuable reference for sustainable forest management planning and actions in these areas.
5. Conclusions
Assessing forest structure and attributes is crucial for sustainable forest management. Comparing forests based on their mode of regeneration under similar socio-environmental conditions offers pathways to optimize benefits for both people and the ecosystem. Our findings show that unimodal stand structures in planted Pine forests, despite higher biomass and carbon sequestration, indicate a lack of age gradation, compromising sustainable production and necessitating interventions like thinning, canopy opening, and promoting natural regeneration. Challenges such as the absence of natural regeneration, frequent fires, and soil erosion limit the long-term sustainability of these forests. Naturally regenerated forests, in contrast, provide gradual carbon capture and significant social benefits, including fodder, fuelwood, reduced fire risk, and less soil erosion due to diverse canopy coverage. These forests show a consistent age distribution, minimal fire incidents, abundant regeneration, greater biodiversity, and lower regeneration costs but still require moderate interventions to optimize benefits.
Further, our study is pioneering through the use of tree rings to assess biomass production and carbon accumulation in both planted and natural forests, offering critical insights for forest management. Age determination aids in rotation planning and environmental monitoring, with findings indicating stable conditions over time. The bell-shaped distribution in planted forests suggests unstable stand structures, requiring silvicultural interventions for sustainable management. Naturally regenerated stands demonstrate steady biomass progression, offering greater potential for sustainability. Mechanisms like REDD+ can provide monetary incentives for carbon enhancement without sacrificing other ecosystem services. These insights are valuable for policymakers aiming to optimize societal and environmental benefits through sustainable forest management, applicable to both artificially regenerated and naturally occurring forests worldwide.