Next Article in Journal
Predicting the Future Distribution and Habitat Suitability of Ilex latifolia Thunb. in China under Climate Change Scenarios
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Land Use Change on Water-Related Ecosystem Services under Multiple Ecological Restoration Scenarios in the Ganjiang River Basin, China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 15
Issue 7
10.3390/f15071226
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Non-Linear Relationships between Fine Root Functional Traits and Biomass in Different Semi-Arid Ecosystems on the Loess Plateau of China

by
Zhun Tian
1,
Rui Wang
1,
Zihan Sun
1,
Yang Peng
2,
Mingfeng Jiang
2,
Shiqi Wu
1,
Ziqiang Yuan
3,
Xin Song
4,
Chao Fang
2,* and
Jordi Sardans
4,5
1
Changwang School of Honors, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
2
Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Carbon Source and Sink, China Meteorological Administration (ECSS-CMA), School of Ecology and Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, No. 222, South Tianshui Road, Lanzhou 730000, China
4
CREAF, Cerdanyola del Valles, 08193 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
5
CSIC, Global Ecology Unit, CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2024, 15(7), 1226; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15071226
Submission received: 5 May 2024 / Revised: 3 July 2024 / Accepted: 12 July 2024 / Published: 15 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Ecology and Management)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
As a key soil carbon process, changes in plant root growth may have a dramatic impact on the global ecosystem’s carbon cycle. Fine root functional traits and fine root biomass can be used as important indexes of plant root growth. Compared with the much better understood relationships between aboveground plant functional traits and aboveground biomass, knowledge on the relationships between fine root functional traits and belowground biomass still remains limited. In this study, plant fine roots in 30 abandoned lands, 9 woodlands, 29 alfalfa grasslands, 30 Caragana shrublands and 29 croplands were sampled at 0–20 and 20–40 cm soil depths in Zhonglianchuan, Yuzhong County, Gansu Province, China (36°02′ N, 104°24′ E), to clarify the characteristics of the relationships between fine root functional traits (e.g., diameter, specific root area (SRA) and specific root length (SRL)) and fine root biomass at 0–20 and 20–40 cm soil depths. The results showed that the relationships between the fine root functional traits and fine root biomass in these ecosystems were robust, allowing for the use of an allometric growth model at both 0–20 and 20–40 cm soil depths (p < 0.05). Specifically, the relationship between root diameter and fine root biomass was consistent with highly significant positive power, while highly significant negative power relationships of SRA and SRL with fine root biomass were observed (p < 0.01, except the root diameter–biomass models in the woodlands in the 0–20 cm soil layer (p = 0.017) and 20–40 cm soil layer (p = 0.025)). The results can provide some parameters for these terrestrial ecosystem process models. From this perspective, our study is beneficial in the construction of suitable strategies to increase plant biomass, which will help with the restoration of the semi-arid region of the Loess Plateau of China.

1. Introduction

Plant functional traits are defined as “any trait which impacts fitness indirectly via its effects on growth, reproduction and survival” [1]. The trait difference between different plant species is an important part of plant functional diversity and plays an important role in theoretical research and modeling. The “resource economics trade-off strategy” among the plant functional traits is a landmark discovery in plant physiological ecology, and has become the main mechanism through which to explain the adaptation of different plants to environmental changes [2]. As an important component of plant functional traits, fine root functional traits are considered factors that reflect the ability of plants to compete for soil resources (e.g., root length and mass density) [3,4] and their growth rate (e.g., SRL) [3,4,5]. Based on the root economics spectrum (RES) [6,7,8,9,10,11,12], it may be hypothesized that fine root functional traits can be associated with fast resource acquisition or enhanced resource conservation—a trade-off between plant growth and survival [13]. However, due to the heterogeneity of soil environments and technological limitations, understanding of fine root functional traits is relatively behind that of the well-studied relationships in plant aboveground traits [13,14]. This limits the understanding of the relationship between above- and below-ground functional traits of plants and their adaptation to the environment [15].
There are two important implications of conducting research on fine root functional traits. On the one hand, it has been pointed out that approximately 40% of photosynthetic carbon fixation is allocated to fine roots (diameter < 2 mm) [16]. Therefore, the relationships between fine root functional traits (e.g., diameter, SRA and SRL) and fine root biomass may have important significance for predicting fluxes in the carbon cycle. On the other hand, previous studies have shown that factors affecting fine root functional traits include temperature [17,18], soil water status [19,20], root order [21], soil nutrient availability and resource allocation [22,23], and characteristics of soil microbial communities [24,25]. In addition, Wang et al. (2021) found that species differences affected root traits in the Loess Plateau [26]. For instance, in order to balance nutrient uptake when there are different availabilities of minerals in the rhizosphere, plants trigger fitness strategies such as enhancing root growth [27]. Some root traits (e.g., total root length, root diameter, and growth) are negatively affected by bulk density in compacted soil [28]. Soil pH may indirectly modulate the architecture of the root system by altering soil nutrient availability [29]. Accordingly, fine root functional traits can integrate environmental changes.
Plant biomass changes can be characterized using allometric growth models [30]. Plant allometric models are often constructed using the relationship between aboveground biomass and height or plant coverage [31]. Current studies on the relationship between fine root biomass and fine root functional traits have mainly focused on some common plants, such as wheat [32,33], alfalfa [34] and sugarcane [35], or specific ecosystems, such as deserts [36], forests [37] and crop ecosystems [38]. Studies of traits based on biomass models of root growth in semi-arid shrubs and forest ecosystems are still lacking. Additionally, the factors affecting fine root functional traits may change with soil depth [16]. Hence, establishing fine root functional trait–biomass models based on the relationships between fine root functional traits and fine root biomass in topsoil and subsoil in different ecosystems is of great scientific significance for predicting ecosystem adaptation to environmental changes, especially in semi-arid shrubs and forest ecosystems.
Ecosystems in arid and semi-arid regions are an important part of the carbon sink of terrestrial ecosystems [39], but they may be relatively fragile and sensitive to global changes [40]. In the Loess Plateau, alfalfa, Caragana and trees (e.g., Populus tomentosa Carr and Betula platyphylla Sukaczev) are widely used for vegetation restoration [41,42]. The increasing biomass of these plants is an important issue. It has been pointed out that fine root functional traits are related to the absorption capacity of fine roots [43,44]. Increased nutrient uptake efficiency contributes to plant biomass accumulation [45,46]. Hence, relationships between the fine root functional traits and fine root biomass in both topsoil and subsoil may help in constructing strategies to increase plant biomass, which is beneficial to the restoration of the semi-arid region of the Loess Plateau of China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Study Area

The sample sites were located in Zhonglianchuan, Yuzhong County, Gansu Province, China (36°02′ N, 104°24′ E; 2400 m above sea level). This region has a temperate semi-arid continental climate, with a mean annual air temperature of 7.4 °C [47], a mean annual rainfall of 305 mm occurring during the growing season (April–September) and a mean annual evaporation of 1300 mm [48]. The soil type is classified as Heima soil [49], which is the equivalent of Calcic Kastanozem in the FAO Taxonomy, and the landform is a Loess hilly area. The main dominant plant species are gramineous herbs, including Agropyron cristatum, Leymus secalinus and Stipa capillata, non-gramineous herbs such as Artemisia frigida and Heteropappus altaicus, leguminous herbs such as Medicago sativa L., Oxytropis and Astragalus polycladus, shrubs such as Caragana korshinkii Kom., and tree species including Populus tomentosa Carr, Betula platyphylla Sukaczev and Prunus armeniaca L. [48]. The contents of soil elements, pH and bulk density of five ecosystems is shown in Table 1.

2.2. Research Methods and Sample Collection

In August 2022, we selected 30 abandoned lands, 9 woodlands, 29 alfalfa fields, 30 Caragana shrubs and 29 croplands according to the plant species in this area (Figure 1). The main dominant plant species were Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn, Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv. and Artemisia frigida Willd. in the Abandoned lands. The 9 woodlands included 4 Prunus armeniaca L. lands, 3 Populus tomentosa Carr lands, 1 Cupressus funebris Endl. land, and 1 Betula platyphylla Sukaczev land. The Caragana shrubs were Caragana korshinkii Kom. The 29 alfalfa fields were Medicago sativa L. The 29 croplands included 9 corn fields, 9 potato fields, 3 buckwheat fields, 4 oat fields, 2 millet fields, 1 broomcorn field and 1 lily field.
Fine roots (<2 mm in diameter) acquire essential soil resources and play an important role in ecological processes, such as the cycling of nutrients and carbon in terrestrial ecosystems [50,51]. Fine roots were obtained in different ecosystems. Since roots distribute differently with different soil depths [52,53], which may lead to differences in the relationships between fine root functional traits and biomass in different soil depths, a root core with a 4.2 cm inner diameter was used to sample the roots at 0–20 and 20–40 cm soil depths in each field. With the root core, two samples close to the well-grown dominant plant were taken and pooled into a composite sample in each field. In the laboratory, the samples were placed in a 0.15 mm sieve. The roots in the samples were carefully washed by wet sieving under gently flowing water to carefully remove the attached soil [54]. And then, fresh root samples were placed in water, and we selected roots that could pass through a 2 mm aperture sieve as “fine roots”. The selected roots were placed completely flat without overlap and scanned in HP Root Scanner (HP Inc., Spring, TX, USA). The root images were saved in JPG format with a resolution of 300 dpi. Finally, the scanned root samples were dried in an oven at 70 °C to constant mass to obtain the root dry weight [55].

2.3. Fine Root Functional Traits

The scanned root area and root length were analyzed by the free software ImageJ (V2.3.0/1.53q) [56,57,58]. The analysis function of ImageJ gave the scanned root area and root length. Assuming that the root is a cylinder [59], the root diameter is calculated via “root scanned area = root length × diameter” (the upper and lower bottom areas of the cylinder are ignored).
Fine root biomass is calculated using the following formula [54]:
RB = D W / ( 2 × π × R 2 )
where RB is the fine root biomass (g m−2); DW is the root dry weight (g); 2 represents the two samples taken with the root; R is the inner radius of the root core (0.021 m).
The SRL is calculated using the following formula [13]:
SRL = L / D W
where SRL is the specific root length (m g−1); L is the root length (m); DW is the root dry weight (g).
The SRA is calculated using the following formula [54]:
SRA = S A / D W
where SRA is the specific root area (m2 g−1); SA is the root surface area (m2); DW is the root dry weight (g).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

We modeled fine root functional traits and fine root biomass at both 0–20 and 20–40 cm soil depths in each of the five ecosystems. Under the prerequisite of p < 0.05, the optimal regression method was selected to establish the fine root functional trait (diameter, SRA and SRL)–fine root biomass models according to the R2 values and the power function (Y = a xb).
The accuracy of the model was tested by comparing the predicted and measured values of the model, taking the measured value as the independent variable, “x”, and the predicted value as the dependent variable, “Y”, and then we established the equation “Y = kx + b”, in which the closer the value of “k” is to 1, the higher the accuracy of the model is, and “b” is a constant value [60]. For each of the five ecosystems, we randomly selected 70% of the data for modeling and the remaining 30% for model validation [61,62,63]. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and Origin 2015 (OriginLab OriginPro 2015, Northampton, MA, USA) was used for plotting.

3. Result

3.1. Root Functional Trait Model Based on Fine Root Biomass in Different Ecosystems

The relationships between fine root functional traits and fine root biomass were typically power functions. The relationship between diameter and fine root biomass was significantly positive (p < 0.05, Figure 2A,D,G,J,M and Figure 3A,D,G,M) at the 0–20 and 20–40 cm soil depths. The relationships between SRA, SRL, and fine root biomass were significantly negative at the 0–20 and 20–40 cm soil depths (p < 0.01, Figure 2B,C,E,F,H,I,K,L,N,O and Figure 3B,C,E,F,H,I,K,L,N,O).

3.2. Test of the Regression Models

The slopes of the tested models for the three functional traits at a 0–20 cm soil depth in the abandoned lands were closest to 1, while R2 values of abandoned lands were the highest among the five ecosystems, followed by Caragana shrublands, croplands (Figure 4), whereas R2 values of Caragana shrublands were the highest among the five ecosystems, followed by croplands and alfalfa grasslands at a 20–40 cm soil depth (Figure 5). In the same ecosystem, the model of SRL–fine root biomass is best, followed by that of SRA and diameter, except for croplands at the 0–20 cm soil layer and alfalfa grasslands and Caragana shrublands in the 20–40 cm soil layer (Figure 4 and Figure 5).

4. Discussion

Allometric growth describes the non-linear relationship between an organism’s size and other properties, usually expressed as a power function [64,65]. Allometric growth relationships are common in forest ecosystems. For example, Peichl et al. (2007) studied an age sequence of four (2-, 15-, 30-, and 65-year-old) eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) forests in southern Ontario, Canada, and established age-specific allometric equations by using allometric relationships [66]. Ishihara et al. (2015) developed generic allometric equations for aboveground biomass and component (stem, branch, leaf, and root) biomass using large, compiled data sets of 1203 harvested trees belonging to 102 species [67]. Ma et al. (2020) established allometric growth models for the aridland shrub Reaumuria soongorica, including equations of above-ground biomass, branch biomass, foliage biomass and root biomass [68]. Many existing allometry models mainly focus on the prediction of above- and below-ground biomass [69,70,71] for specific species, limiting the range of trait variation. Accordingly, a major challenge is improving knowledge of root trait variation within and among species across diverse communities, ecosystems, and biological communities [72,73]. Our study focused on plant fine roots in different ecosystems, and robust allometric relationships between fine root functional traits and fine root biomass were observed. Different from the existing L-system [74,75], DyRoot [76], Root Typ [77] and other root models, the power function models established in our study focused more on fine root functional traits and fine root biomass, simply and intuitively reflecting the dynamic changes in the fine root functional traits following standing fine root biomass.
The plant economic spectrum (PES) hypothesis predicts that leaf and root traits evolved in coordination [13]. Therefore, there should be a correspondence between the leaf economics spectrum (LES) and RES [14,78,79]. For aboveground traits, allometric growth relationships have been reported in numerous studies, with power and logarithmic functions predominating [80,81,82,83], while linear relationships have also been shown [84]. The choice of functions also depends on the type of functional traits. For instance, Kong et al. (2019) showed an allometry-based nonlinear relationship between root tissue density and absorptive root diameter, while showing a linear relationship between stele radius and root tissue density [72].
Recognition of the non-linear relationship between fine root functional traits and fine root biomass can help us understand the trade-offs among fine root functional traits [67]. Different plant species have different root growth strategies; thus, their fine root functional traits are also different [72,85]. We established fine root functional trait–biomass models in both topsoil and subsoil in different ecosystems (Figure 2 and Figure 3). By checking the prediction results of the power function models (Figure 4 and Figure 5), we found that the measured values of the three fine root functional traits of the five vegetations were basically in good agreement with the predicted values at both 0–20 and 20–40 cm soil layers, indicating that the simulation accuracy of fine root functional trait–biomass models established in these soil layers was robust.
The differences in the accuracy of the models, especially the observed deviations from the perfect fit in the five ecosystems, may be related to the diversity of species, topographic, edaphic factors and the spatial variability of roots in the site [86]. Combined with the differences in soil resources of the five ecosystems (Table 1), it was inferred that the deviations may be related to BD, TN and TP, which is consistent with some reports [27,28]. Moreover, Comas et al. (2005, 2010) emphasized that root growth varies due to plant (e.g., developmental stages) and environmental factors [87,88]. Roybal et al. (2019) found that the relationships between root traits and environmental conditions (e.g., temperature and soil moisture) were highly variable among species [89]. Hence, how the site properties (e.g., soil resources, anthropogenic activities) affect the relationships between fine root functional traits and root production and the R2 values of the models should be the focus of future research to further explain the observed deviations.

5. Conclusions

The results showed robust allometric relationships between fine root functional traits and fine root biomass. The relationships between fine root functional traits and biomass indicate important differences based on ecosystem type and root traits chosen for analysis in a semi-arid region. Accordingly, such results can help inform future efforts to model belowground traits at the plant and ecosystem scales.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.T., R.W. and C.F.; data curation, Z.T., R.W., Z.S. and J.S.; funding acquisition, C.F.; investigation, M.J.; methodology, Z.T. and Y.P.; project administration, C.F.; resources, S.W.; software, Z.T. and Z.S.; supervision, C.F.; Validation, Z.T., R.W., Z.S., J.S. and C.F.; writing—original draft, Z.T.; writing—review and editing, C.F., X.S., Z.Y. and J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42107248), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology Talent Start-up Fund (Grant No. 2021r088), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing Excellent Talent Training Program-Innovation and Entrepreneurship Project for College Students (Grant No. ZYJHDC202309016), and Jiangsu Province College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (Grant No. 202410300091Z).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Semi-Arid Ecosystem Research Station located on the Loess Plateau, which is affiliated with Lanzhou University, for platform support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Violle, C.; Navas, M.-L.; Vile, D.; Kazakou, E.; Fortunel, C.; Hummel, I.; Garnier, E. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 2007, 116, 882–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, Y.; Sun, L.; Zhu, B. Trade-offs among fine-root phosphorus-acquisition strategies of 15 tropical woody species. For. Ecosyst. 2022, 9, 100055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pérez-Harguindeguy, N.; Díaz, S.; Garnier, E.; Lavorel, S.; Poorter, H.; Jaureguiberry, P.; Bret-Harte, M.S.; Cornwell, W.K.; Craine, J.M.; Gurvich, D.E.; et al. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot. 2013, 61, 167–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stokes, A.; Atger, C.; Bengough, A.G.; Fourcaud, T.; Sidle, R.C. Desirable plant root traits for protecting natural and engineered slopes against landslides. Plant Soil 2009, 324, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Roumet, C.; Lafont, F.; Sari, M.; Warembourg, F.; Garnier, E. Root traits and taxonomic affiliation of nine herbaceous species grown in glasshouse conditions. Plant Soil 2008, 312, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shen, Y.; Natalia Umaña, M.; Li, W.; Fang, M.; Chen, Y.; Lu, H.; Yu, S. Linking soil nutrients and traits to seedling growth: A test of the plant economics spectrum. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 505, 119941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Han, M.; Sun, L.; Gan, D.; Fu, L.; Zhu, B. Root functional traits are key determinants of the rhizosphere effect on soil organic matter decomposition across 14 temperate hardwood species. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2020, 151, 108019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Z.; Liu, M.; Li, L.; Hou, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, H.; Yang, C.; Yang, L. Absorptive root-multidimension strategy links air temperature and species distribution in a montane forest. For. Ecosyst. 2023, 10, 100113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Y.; Cao, J.; Lu, M.; Kardol, P.; Wang, J.; Fan, G.; Kong, D. The origin of bi-dimensionality in plant root traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2024, 39, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Roumet, C.; Birouste, M.; Picon-Cochard, C.; Ghestem, M.; Osman, N.; Vrignon-Brenas, S.; Cao, K.F.; Stokes, A. Root structure-function relationships in 74 species: Evidence of a root economics spectrum related to carbon economy. New Phytol. 2016, 210, 815–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ye, Z.; Ryser, P. Root porosity contributes to root trait space of wetland monocotyledons independently of economics traits. Plant Soil 2021, 471, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, J.; Le, X.; Chen, X.; Reich, P.B.; Niklas, K.J.; Li, X.; Wu, P.; Zhou, Y.; Zhong, Q.; Hu, D.; et al. Divergent intra- and interspecific root order variability identifies a two-dimensional root economics spectrum. Plant Soil 2024, 499, 473–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Weemstra, M.; Mommer, L.; Visser, E.J.; van Ruijven, J.; Kuyper, T.W.; Mohren, G.M.; Sterck, F.J. Towards a multidimensional root trait framework: A tree root review. New Phytol. 2016, 211, 1159–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fort, F. Grounding trait-based root functional ecology. Funct. Ecol. 2023, 37, 2159–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bardgett, R.D.; Mommer, L.; De Vries, F.T. Going underground: Root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014, 29, 692–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jones, D.L.; Nguyen, C.; Finlay, R.D. Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: Carbon trading at the soil–root interface. Plant Soil 2009, 321, 5–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Balliu, A.; Sallaku, G. The environment temperature affects post-germination growth and root system architecture of pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 278, 109858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Walne, C.H.; Reddy, K.R. Temperature Effects on the Shoot and Root Growth, Development, and Biomass Accumulation of Corn (Zea mays L.). Agriculture 2022, 12, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Guan, Q.; Zhang, E.; Sun, Y.; Yan, Y.; Du, Q. Coupling mechanism between vegetation and multi-depth soil moisture in arid–semiarid area: Shift of dominant role from vegetation to soil moisture. For. Ecol. Manag. 2023, 546, 121323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, G.; Zhou, X.; Nie, Y.; Bai, S.H.; Zhou, L.; Shao, J.; Cheng, W.; Wang, J.; Hu, F.; Fu, Y. Drought-induced changes in root biomass largely result from altered root morphological traits: Evidence from a synthesis of global field trials. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 2589–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Beyer, F.; Hertel, D.; Leuschner, C. Fine root morphological and functional traits in Fagus sylvatica and Fraxinus excelsior saplings as dependent on species, root order and competition. Plant Soil 2013, 373, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, Y.; Ji, Z.; Tao, Y.; Wei, S.; Jiao, W.; Fang, Y.; Jian, P.; Shen, C.; Qin, Y.; Zhang, S.; et al. Improving rice nitrogen-use efficiency by modulating a novel monouniquitination machinery for optimal root plasticity response to nitrogen. Nat. Plants 2023, 9, 1902–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guo, Z.; Li, P.; Ma, L.; Yang, X.; Yang, J.; Wu, Y.; Liu, G.; Ritsema, C.J.; Geissen, V. Cascading effects from soil to maize functional traits explain maize response to microplastics disturbance in multi-nutrient soil environment. Geoderma 2024, 441, 116759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, F.; Liao, H.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, P.; Cao, Y.; Fang, J.; Chen, S.; Li, L.; Sun, L.; et al. Auxin-producing bacteria promote barley rhizosheath formation. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yan, H.; Cong, M.; Hu, Y.; Qiu, C.; Yang, Z.; Tang, G.; Xu, W.; Zhu, X.; Sun, X.; Jia, H. Biochar-mediated changes in the microbial communities of rhizosphere soil alter the architecture of maize roots. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1023444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, B.; Li, P.; Huang, C.; Liu, G.; Yang, Y. Effects of root morphological traits on soil detachment for ten herbaceous species in the Loess Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 142304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Singh, K.; Gupta, S.; Singh, A.P. Review: Nutrient-nutrient interactions governing underground plant adaptation strategies in a heterogeneous environment. Plant Sci. 2024, 342, 112024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tracy, S.R.; Black, C.R.; Roberts, J.A.; Sturrock, C.; Mairhofer, S.; Craigon, J.; Mooney, S.J. Quantifying the impact of soil compaction on root system architecture in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) by X-ray micro-computed tomography. Ann. Bot. 2012, 110, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kang, Y.; Yang, H.; Zeng, S.; Jiang, S.; Xie, C.; Wang, Z.; Dong, C.; Xu, Y.; Shen, Q. Mitigation of soil acidification in orchards: A case study to alleviate early defoliation in pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) trees. Rhizosphere 2021, 20, 100445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, G.; Hobbie, S.E.; Reich, P.B.; Yang, Y.; Robinson, D. Allometry of fine roots in forest ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2019, 22, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zanvo, S.M.G.; Mensah, S.; Salako, K.V.; Glèlè Kakaï, R. Tree height-diameter, aboveground and belowground biomass allometries for two West African mangrove species. Biomass Bioenerg. 2023, 176, 106917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, G.; Fang, Q.; Peng, S.; Li, Y. Genotypic variation of plant biomass under nitrogen deficiency is positively correlated with conservative economic traits in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 2175–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Romillac, N.; Piutti, S.; Amiaud, B.; Slezack-Deschaumes, S. Effects of organic inputs derived from pea and wheat root functional traits on soil protease activities. Pedobiologia 2019, 77, 150576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, S.; Nie, Z.; Sun, J.; Li, X.; Yang, G. The physiological role of abscisic acid in regulating root system architecture of alfalfa in its adaptation to water deficit. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chopart, J.L.; Azevedo, M.C.B.; Le Mézo, L.; Marion, D. Functional Relationship Between Sugarcane Root Biomass and Length for Cropping System Applications. Sugar Tech 2011, 12, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jiang, X.; Jia, X.; Gao, S.; Jiang, Y.; Wei, N.; Han, C.; Zha, T.; Liu, P.; Tian, Y.; Qin, S. Plant nutrient contents rather than physical traits are coordinated between leaves and roots in a desert shrubland. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 734775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Pierick, K.; Leuschner, C.; Homeier, J. Topography as a factor driving small-scale variation in tree fine root traits and root functional diversity in a species-rich tropical montane forest. New Phytol. 2020, 230, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tang, L.; Zhan, M.; Shang, C.; Yuan, J.; Wan, Y.; Qin, M. Dynamics of root exuded carbon and its relationships with root traits of rapeseed and wheat. Plant Soil Environ. 2021, 67, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, L.; Xiao, J.; Zheng, Y.; Li, S.; Zhou, Y. Increased carbon uptake and water use efficiency in global semi-arid ecosystems. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 034022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gong, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Lian, J.; Ma, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, M.; Si, H.; Cao, W. Quantitative assessment of the contributions of climate change and human activities on vegetation degradation and restoration in typical ecologically fragile areas of China. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 144, 109536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, R.; Wang, D. Soil C, N, P and K stoichiometry affected by vegetation restoration patterns in the alpine region of the Loess Plateau, Northwest China. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0241859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wu, Y.; Jia, X.; An, J.; Huang, L.; Wang, L.; Shao, M. Afforestation vegetation uses water from very deep soil layers in the semi-arid Loess Plateau. Hydrol. Process. 2023, 37, e14933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Corneo, P.E.; Keitel, C.; Kertesz, M.A.; Dijkstra, F.A. Variation in specific root length among 23 wheat genotypes affects leaf δ13C and yield. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2017, 246, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zobel, R.W.; Kinraide, T.B.; Baligar, V.C. Fine root diameters can change in response to changes in nutrient concentrations. Plant Soil 2007, 297, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Song, X.; Fang, C.; Yuan, Z.; Li, F. Long-Term Growth of Alfalfa Increased Soil Organic Matter Accumulation and Nutrient Mineralization in a Semi-Arid Environment. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 9, 649346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Feng, X.; Wang, R.; Li, T.; Cai, J.; Liu, H.; Li, H.; Jiang, Y. Plant functional traits modulate the effects of soil acidification on above- and belowground biomass. Biogeosciences 2024, 21, 2641–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yuan, Z.; Feng, X.; Tian, J.; Song, X.; Li, G.; Fang, C. Controlling factors of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in lucerne grasslands in a semiarid environment. Catena 2022, 211, 105983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yuan, Z.; Fang, C.; Zhang, R.; Li, F.; Javaid, M.M.; Janssens, I.A. Topographic influences on soil properties and aboveground biomass in lucerne-rich vegetation in a semi-arid environment. Geoderma 2019, 344, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jiang, H.; Jiang, J.; Jia, Y.; Li, F.; Xu, J. Soil carbon pool and effects of soil fertility in seeded alfalfa fields on the semi-arid Loess Plateau in China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 2350–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. McCormack, M.L.; Dickie, I.A.; Eissenstat, D.M.; Fahey, T.J.; Fernandez, C.W.; Guo, D.; Helmisaari, H.S.; Hobbie, E.A.; Iversen, C.M.; Jackson, R.B.; et al. Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes. New Phytol. 2015, 207, 505–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ping, Q.; Fang, C.; Yuan, X.; Agathokleous, E.; He, H.; Zheng, H.; Feng, Z. Nitrogen addition changed the relationships of fine root respiration and biomass with key physiological traits in ozone-stressed poplars. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 875, 162721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Li, J.; Chen, H.; Guo, K.; Li, W.; Feng, X.; Liu, X. Changes in soil properties induced by pioneer vegetation patches in coastal ecosystem. Catena 2021, 204, 105393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, G.; Meng, W.; Pan, W.; Han, J.; Liao, Y. Effect of soil water content changes caused by ridge-furrow plastic film mulching on the root distribution and water use pattern of spring maize in the Loess Plateau. Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 261, 107338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fang, C.; Verbrigghe, N.; Sigurdsson, B.D.; Ostonen, I.; Leblans, N.I.W.; Marañón-Jiménez, S.; Fuchslueger, L.; Sigurðsson, P.; Meeran, K.; Portillo-Estrada, M.; et al. Decadal soil warming decreased vascular plant above and belowground production in a subarctic grassland by inducing nitrogen limitation. New Phytol. 2023, 240, 565–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Raklami, A.; Quintas-Nunes, F.; Nascimento, F.X.; Jemo, M.; Oufdou, K.; Syed, A.; Bahkali, A.H.; Verma, M.; Nafis, A. Assessing the growth-promoting traits of actinobacteria spp. isolated from Cleome africana: Implications on growth and root enhancement of Medicago sativa. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2023, 35, 102722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Montagnoli, A.; Baronti, S.; Alberto, D.; Chiatante, D.; Scippa, G.S.; Terzaghi, M. Pioneer and fibrous root seasonal dynamics of Vitis vinifera L. are affected by biochar application to a low fertility soil: A rhizobox approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 751, 141455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tan, W.H.; Ibrahim, H.; Chan, D.J.C. Estimation of mass, chlorophylls, and anthocyanins of Spirodela polyrhiza with smartphone acquired images. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 190, 106449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hobson, D.J.; Harty, M.A.; Langton, D.; McDonnell, K.; Tracy, S.R. The establishment of winter wheat root system architecture in field soils: The effect of soil type on root development in a temperate climate. Soil Use Manag. 2023, 39, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Clark, L.J.; Price, A.H.; Steele, K.A.; Whalley, W.R. Evidence from near-isogenic lines that root penetration increases with root diameter and bending stiffness in rice. Funct. Plant Biol. 2008, 35, 1163–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nasiri, M.R.; Amiri, E.; Behzadi, J.; Shahinrokhsar, P.; Mohammadian Roshan, N. A linear model for predicting olive yield using root characteristics. Rhizosphere 2024, 29, 100859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Campbell, M.; Ortuño, J.; Koidis, A.; Theodoridou, K. The use of near-infrared and mid-infrared spectroscopy to rapidly measure the nutrient composition and the in vitro rumen dry matter digestibility of brown seaweeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2022, 285, 115239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, Y.; Freedman, Z.B.; Hartemink, A.E.; Whitman, T.; Huang, J. Characterizing soil microbial properties using MIR spectra across 12 ecoclimatic zones (NEON sites). Geoderma 2022, 409, 115647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yusup, A.; Halik, Ü.; Keyimu, M.; Aishan, T.; Abliz, A.; Dilixiati, B.; Wei, J. Trunk volume estimation of irregular shaped Populus euphratica riparian forest using TLS point cloud data and multivariate prediction models. For. Ecosyst. 2023, 10, 100082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sherratt, E.; McCullough, E.L.; Painting, C.J. Commentary: The ecological and evolutionary implications of allometry. Evol. Ecol. 2022, 36, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhao, M.; Tian, S.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Z.; Zeng, S.; Liu, S. Allometric relationships, functional differentiations, and scaling of growth rates across 151 tree species in China. Ecosphere 2021, 12, e03522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Peichl, M.; Arain, M.A. Allometry and partitioning of above- and belowground tree biomass in an age-sequence of white pine forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2007, 253, 68–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ishihara, M.I.; Utsugi, H.; Tanouchi, H.; Aiba, M.; Kurokawa, H.; Onoda, Y.; Nagano, M.; Umehara, T.; Ando, M.; Miyata, R.; et al. Efficacy of generic allometric equations for estimating biomass: A test in Japanese natural forests. Ecol. Appl. 2015, 25, 1433–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ma, X.; Wang, X. Biomass partitioning and allometric relations of the Reaumuria soongorica shrub in Alxa steppe desert in NW China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 468, 118178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, J.; Fiddler, G.O.; Young, D.H.; Shestak, C.; Carlson, R. Allometry of tree biomass and carbon partitioning in ponderosa pine plantations grown under diverse conditions. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 497, 119526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Annighöfer, P.; Mund, M.; Seidel, D.; Ammer, C.; Ameztegui, A.; Balandier, P.; Bebre, I.; Coll, L.; Collet, C.C.; Hamm, T.; et al. Examination of aboveground attributes to predict belowground biomass of young trees. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 505, 119942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hiernaux, P.; Issoufou, H.B.-A.; Igel, C.; Kariryaa, A.; Kourouma, M.; Chave, J.; Mougin, E.; Savadogo, P. Allometric equations to estimate the dry mass of Sahel woody plants mapped with very-high resolution satellite imagery. For. Ecol. Manag. 2023, 529, 120653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kong, D.; Wang, J.; Wu, H.; Valverde-Barrantes, O.J.; Wang, R.; Zeng, H.; Kardol, P.; Zhang, H.; Feng, Y. Nonlinearity of root trait relationships and the root economics spectrum. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Guo, S.; Li, K.M.; Liu, M.; Wang, W.; Fan, C.; Xu, X.; Cui, X. Variations in plant root traits shaped by intraspecific interactions are species-specific. Rhizosphere 2024, 30, 100889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yang, L.; Wu, P.-P.; Liao, M.-F.; Peng, J.; Tang, Z.-Z.; Long, H.-B.; Yu, X.-Y.; Zhang, H.-H. Three- dimensional modeling and visualization of rice root system based on the improved dual-scale automaton and L-system. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 195, 106823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Xu, H.; Wang, X.; Liu, C.; Chen, J.; Zhang, C. A 3D root system morphological and mechanical model based on L-Systems and its application to estimate the shear strength of root-soil composites. Soil Till. Res. 2021, 212, 105074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lu, H.; Yuan, W.; Chen, X. A processes-based dynamic root growth model integrated into the ecosystem model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 2019, 11, 4614–4628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pagès, L.; Vercambre, G.; Drouet, J.L.; Lecompte, F.; Collet, C.; Bot, J.L. Root Typ: A generic model to depict and analyse the root system architecture. Plant Soil 2004, 258, 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhou, Y.; Ma, H.; Lu, Q.; Ma, J.; Shen, Y.; Wang, G. Different responses of leaf and root economics spectrum to grazing time at the community level in desert steppe, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 909, 168547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Ma, J.; Wang, X.; Hou, F. A general pattern of plant traits and their relationships with environmental factors and microbial life-history strategies. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 931, 172670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, L.-L.; Khamphilavong, K.; Zhu, H.-C.; Li, H.; He, X.-J.; Shen, X.-F.; Wang, L.-R.; Kang, Y.-X. Allometric scaling relationships of Larix potaninii subsp. chinensis traits across topographical gradients. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 125, 107492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Guo, Z.; Lin, H.; Chen, S.; Yang, Q. Altitudinal Patterns of Leaf Traits and Leaf Allometry in Bamboo Pleioblastus amarus. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zhu, L.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, P. Interspecific variations in tree allometry and functional traits in subtropical plantations in southern China. Funct. Plant Biol. 2020, 47, 558–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. McIntire, C.D.; Cunliffe, A.M.; Boschetti, F.; Litvak, M.E. Allometric Relationships for Predicting Aboveground Biomass, Sapwood, and Leaf Area of Two-Needle Piñon Pine (Pinus edulis) Amid Open-Grown Conditions in Central New Mexico. For. Sci. 2022, 68, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Gray, E.F.; Wright, I.J.; Falster, D.S.; Eller, A.S.D.; Lehmann, C.E.R.; Bradford, M.G.; Cernusak, L.A. Leaf:wood allometry and functional traits together explain substantial growth rate variation in rainforest trees. AoB Plants 2019, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ma, Z.; Guo, D.; Xu, X.; Lu, M.; Bardgett, R.D.; Eissenstat, D.M.; McCormack, M.L.; Hedin, L.O. Evolutionary history resolves global organization of root functional traits. Nature 2018, 555, 94–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, W.; Liu, W.; Gu, X.; Guan, Z. Effects of tree functional diversity and environmental gradients on belowground biomass in a natural old-growth forest ecosystem. Can. J. For. Res. 2019, 49, 1623–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Comas, L.H.; Anderson, L.J.; Dunst, R.M.; Lakso, A.N.; Eissenstat, D.M. Canopy and environmental control of root dynamics in a long-term study of Concord grape. New Phytol. 2005, 167, 829–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Comas, L.H.; Bauerle, T.L.; Eissenstat, D.M. Biological and environmental factors controlling root dynamics and function: Effects of root ageing and soil moisture. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2010, 16, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Roybal, C.M.; Butterfield, B.J. Species-specific trait-environment relationships among populations of widespread grass species. Oecologia 2019, 189, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Forests 15 01226 g001
Figure 1. The sampling sites of this study on the Loess Plateau. The colors of the dots represent the corresponding ecosystems.
Figure 1. The sampling sites of this study on the Loess Plateau. The colors of the dots represent the corresponding ecosystems.
Forests 15 01226 g001
Forests 15 01226 g002
Figure 2. The subfigures (A–O) are the relationships between fine root functional traits and fine root biomass in different ecosystems at the 0–20 cm soil depth. SRL, specific root length (m g−1); SRA, specific root area (m2 g−1). Significance is set at p < 0.05. “*” means p < 0.05 and “**” means p < 0.01.
Figure 2. The subfigures (A–O) are the relationships between fine root functional traits and fine root biomass in different ecosystems at the 0–20 cm soil depth. SRL, specific root length (m g−1); SRA, specific root area (m2 g−1). Significance is set at p < 0.05. “*” means p < 0.05 and “**” means p < 0.01.
Forests 15 01226 g002
Forests 15 01226 g003
Figure 3. The subfigures (A–O) are the relationships between fine root functional traits and fine root biomass in different ecosystems at the 20–40 cm soil depth. SRL, specific root length (m g−1); SRA, specific root area (m2 g−1). Significance is set at p < 0.05. “*” means p < 0.05 and “**” means p < 0.01.
Figure 3. The subfigures (A–O) are the relationships between fine root functional traits and fine root biomass in different ecosystems at the 20–40 cm soil depth. SRL, specific root length (m g−1); SRA, specific root area (m2 g−1). Significance is set at p < 0.05. “*” means p < 0.05 and “**” means p < 0.01.
Forests 15 01226 g003
Forests 15 01226 g004
Figure 4. The subfigures (A–O) are the predicted and measured values of three fine root functional traits based on the non-linear relationships between fine root functional traits and fine root biomass in different ecosystems at the 0–20 cm soil depth. SRL, specific root length (m g−1); SRA, specific root area (m2 g−1). Significance is set at p < 0.05. “*” means p < 0.05 and “**” means p < 0.01.
Figure 4. The subfigures (A–O) are the predicted and measured values of three fine root functional traits based on the non-linear relationships between fine root functional traits and fine root biomass in different ecosystems at the 0–20 cm soil depth. SRL, specific root length (m g−1); SRA, specific root area (m2 g−1). Significance is set at p < 0.05. “*” means p < 0.05 and “**” means p < 0.01.
Forests 15 01226 g004
Forests 15 01226 g005
Figure 5. The subfigures (A–O) are the predicted and measured values of three fine root functional traits based on the non-linear relationships between fine root functional traits and fine root biomass in different ecosystems at the 20–40 cm soil depth. SRL, specific root length (m g−1); SRA, specific root area (m2 g−1). Significance is set at p < 0.05. “*” means p < 0.05 and “**” means p < 0.01.
Figure 5. The subfigures (A–O) are the predicted and measured values of three fine root functional traits based on the non-linear relationships between fine root functional traits and fine root biomass in different ecosystems at the 20–40 cm soil depth. SRL, specific root length (m g−1); SRA, specific root area (m2 g−1). Significance is set at p < 0.05. “*” means p < 0.05 and “**” means p < 0.01.
Forests 15 01226 g005
Table 1. The soil properties in the five ecosystems. BD, soil bulk density; SOC, soil organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus.
Table 1. The soil properties in the five ecosystems. BD, soil bulk density; SOC, soil organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus.
Ecosystem TypepHBDSOCTNTP
(g cm−3)(g kg−1)(g kg−1)(g kg−1)
Abandoned lands8.44 ± 0.161.19 ± 0.149.29 ± 3.22 1.19 ± 0.38 0.61 ± 0.06
Woodlands8.33 ± 0.191.14 ± 0.15 9.78 ± 4.52 1.27 ± 0.58 0.66 ± 0.05
Alfalfa grasslands8.39 ± 0.201.24 ± 0.12 10.01 ± 3.80 1.38 ± 0.55 0.64 ± 0.05
Caragana shrublands8.36 ± 0.23 1.16 ± 0.10 9.75 ± 3.39 1.56 ± 0.57 0.57 ± 0.04
Croplands8.38 ± 0.20 1.26 ± 0.08 9.17 ± 3.93 1.24 ± 0.48 0.71 ± 0.10
Note: The values are arithmetic means ± standard deviations.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tian, Z.; Wang, R.; Sun, Z.; Peng, Y.; Jiang, M.; Wu, S.; Yuan, Z.; Song, X.; Fang, C.; Sardans, J. Non-Linear Relationships between Fine Root Functional Traits and Biomass in Different Semi-Arid Ecosystems on the Loess Plateau of China. Forests 2024, 15, 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15071226

AMA Style

Tian Z, Wang R, Sun Z, Peng Y, Jiang M, Wu S, Yuan Z, Song X, Fang C, Sardans J. Non-Linear Relationships between Fine Root Functional Traits and Biomass in Different Semi-Arid Ecosystems on the Loess Plateau of China. Forests. 2024; 15(7):1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15071226

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tian, Zhun, Rui Wang, Zihan Sun, Yang Peng, Mingfeng Jiang, Shiqi Wu, Ziqiang Yuan, Xin Song, Chao Fang, and Jordi Sardans. 2024. "Non-Linear Relationships between Fine Root Functional Traits and Biomass in Different Semi-Arid Ecosystems on the Loess Plateau of China" Forests 15, no. 7: 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15071226

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop