Next Article in Journal
Biomass Prediction Using Sentinel-2 Imagery and an Artificial Neural Network in the Amazon/Cerrado Transition Region
Previous Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Dynamics Effects of Green Space and Socioeconomic Factors on Urban Agglomeration in Central Yunnan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Factors Driving Unexpected Drought-Induced Nothofagus dombeyi Mortality in a Valdivian Temperate Rainforest, Argentina
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Tree Growth in Relation to Climate Change: Understanding the Impact on Species Worldwide

Faculty of Natural Resources Management, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
Forests 2024, 15(9), 1601; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091601
Submission received: 19 August 2024 / Revised: 8 September 2024 / Accepted: 9 September 2024 / Published: 11 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tree Growth in Relation to Climate Change)
Climate change is one of the most important environmental issues of our time, which has profound effects on ecosystems all over the world [1]. Given its vital role in forest dynamics and carbon sequestration, the effect of climate change on tree growth has drawn the most attention of all its effects [2]. Understanding the various aspects linked to climate change and their impact on tree growth is crucial for forecasting future forest composition and dynamic and efficiently managing forest resources, explaining its significant and increasing interest not only at the species scale but also for biodiversity and ecosystem services [3,4].
Climate is known to influence tree growth since it controls photosynthesis, cell division, and tree metabolism [5,6]. Notwithstanding, climate acts at different spatial and temporal scales [2,7,8], adding to the soil condition and microfauna dynamic [9,10]. Climate variables, including temperature, precipitation, and moisture availability, all affect tree growth [11]. These variables can alter over time as a result of climate change and are not constant in different locations [2]. As a result, different tree species are responding differently throughout the world in terms of growth [2,12,13]. Thus, the structure and function of forests may be significantly impacted by this difference in growth patterns [12,14,15].
Tree growth response is also species-specific, linked to growth habit [2] and autecology [14,16,17]. In addition, this response depends on the stand structure and composition [18,19,20]. Nevertheless, there is a general decline trend for trees facing drought conditions [21,22] or in more heat-limiting (high latitude and altitude, or in cold-air pooling) environments coupled with cloudiness [23] or snowpack [24]. Thus, these factors weaken the tree and cause mortality [25,26,27]. Tree growth is a key for competitive advantage and thus is considered as a proxy for predicting future species and vegetation migration [28].
Tree growth tends to decrease as we move towards higher latitudes, attributed to colder temperatures, shorter growing seasons, and reduced light availability in these regions [29]. As we ascend in elevation, tree growth typically slows down due to lower temperatures and reduced nutrient availability in the soil [6,29]. However, tree species adapted to high-altitude environments may exhibit unique growth patterns and adaptability to changing climate conditions [30,31,32]. In addition, drought events are becoming increasingly common under climate change scenarios [33]. Drought limits the availability of water, leading to physiological stress and decreased tree growth [34,35,36]. In extreme cases, prolonged drought can even lead to tree mortality [37,38,39].
Research on how climate change can affect tree growth in Europe, Asia, and America has revealed that significant timber species could lose adequate habitat in the next decades and suffer from a combination of rising trends and decreased precipitation throughout the growing season [40,41]. Some species, on the other hand, might actually widen their range and even exhibit better growth rates in some areas of their current range [42,43]. They might also demonstrate promise for commercial species when they become established in new areas. Furthermore, the intricate relationships between tree growth and temperature, water, and nutrients increase the complexity of tree growth [2,44]. Forest management might be adjusted to the new growing conditions that are gradually but surely emerging by utilizing mixed forests’ potential resilience to changes in growth conditions [45]. In order to further our understanding of how climate change may affect tree growth, this Special Issue was initiated.
The impact of climate change on tree growth has implications at multiple scales—local, regional, and large-scale. At the local and regional level, changes in tree growth can affect the distribution and composition of tree species [46]. Some species may become more dominant, while others may decline, potentially leading to shifts in entire ecosystems and disrupting species interactions [47]. At a larger scale, climate change can influence the location of ecotones—transitional areas between different ecosystems. As tree species respond differently to changing climate conditions, ecotones can shift, potentially affecting species migration patterns and altering biodiversity patterns [48,49].
While climate change poses significant challenges to tree growth, some species are showing remarkable resilience and adaptability [50,51,52]. Tree species with broader ecological niches and genetic diversity are often better equipped to cope with changing conditions [53]. Understanding the adaptive capacity of different species and promoting diverse forests can enhance the overall resilience of forests to climate change [54]. All these explain the complexity of tree growth associated with climate change-induced and the contradictory findings from different studies [55,56,57].
As the climate continues to change, it is essential to monitor and understand the impact on tree growth worldwide [58,59]. By studying the relationships between climate variables and growth patterns, we can better predict future forest dynamics and develop sustainable management strategies. It is crucial for policymakers, scientists, and land managers to collaborate and implement adaptive measures to preserve the resilience and functionality of forests in the face of climate change.
Numerous studies were mostly conducted in more limiting environments, i.e., higher latitudes [60,61,62] or elevations [63,64,65] and with more common and widespread species, such as black spruce, trembling aspen in North America [66,67,68], Norway spruce, Scots pine, and common beech in Europe [69,70], and larches in Siberian Asia [71,72]. Although these previous studies are very relevant to assess how trees respond to climate change, knowledge gaps remain because there is uncertainty about the response of less common species to climate change-induced events in other parts of the world, such as in the southern hemisphere [73]. In addition, the question still arises about how trees react to climate change in physiological and phenological terms [74].
All in all, this Special Issue offers readers a variety of research investigating the relationships between climate change and tree growth in various biomes (boreal, temperate, cool subalpine), on various continents (North and South America, Europe, and Asia), at various scales (from local populations to latitudinal and altitudinal gradient studies), and with various species (evergreen and deciduous conifer and broadleaf). As much as the editors enjoyed putting this Special Issue together, we hope readers will too. As well, this Special Issue gives a good insight that deals with the above-mentioned aspects and to increase our knowledge and to have ample information on how tree species responded to climate change. Likewise, it will promote discussion, exchange, and debate between scientists and also make forest decision-makers aware for future management.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Malhi, Y.; Franklin, J.; Seddon, N.; Solan, M.; Turner, M.G.; Field, C.B.; Knowlton, N. Climate change and ecosystems: Threats, opportunities and solutions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2020, 375, 20190104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Messaoud, Y.; Reid, A.; Tchebakova, N.M.; Goldman, J.A.; Hofgaard, A. The Historical Complexity of Tree Height Growth Dynamic Associated with Climate Change in Western North America. Forests 2022, 13, 738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ding, J.; Eldridge, D. Intensifying aridity induces tradeoffs among biodiversity and ecosystem services supported by trees. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2024, e13894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zheng, J.; Yang, J.; Jia, H.; Lyu, L.; Langzhen, J.; Zhang, Q.-B. Changes of growth-climate relationships of Smith fir forests along an altitudinal gradient. J. For. Res. 2024, 35, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schmiege, S.C.; Griffin, K.L.; Boelman, N.T.; Vierling, L.A.; Bruner, S.G.; Min, E.; Maguire, A.J.; Jensen, J.; Eitel, J.U.H. Vertical gradients in photosynthetic physiology diverge at the latitudinal range extremes of white spruce. Plant Cell Environ. 2023, 46, 45–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pallardy, S.G. Physiology of woody plants; Elsevier: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sang, Z.; Sebastian-Azcona, J.; Hamann, A.; Menzel, A.; Hacke, U. Adaptive limitations of white spruce populations to drought imply vulnerability to climate change in its western range. Evol. Appl. 2019, 12, 1850–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Izmir, Ş.; Jevsenak, J.; Krajnc, L.; Hafner, P.; Köse, N. Distinct spatial patterns in climate-growth relationships, vegetation and resilience indices of Black pine (Pinus nigra J.F. Arnold) from its northern and southern distribution range. Dendrochronologia 2024, 88, 126236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, W.; Gou, X.; Zhang, F.; Liu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, L. Divergent responses of Qinghai spruce (Picea crassifolia) to recent warming along elevational gradients in the central Qilian Mountains, Northwest China. J. Geogr. Sci. 2023, 33, 151–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sachsenmaier, L.; Schnabel, F.; Dietrich, P.; Eisenhauer, N.; Ferlian, O.; Quosh, J.; Richter, R.; Wirth, C. Forest growth resistance and resilience to the 2018–2020 drought depend on tree diversity and mycorrhizal type. J. Ecol. 2024, 112, 1787–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Messaoud, Y.; Chen, H.Y. The influence of recent climate change on tree height growth differs with species and spatial environment. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e14691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiang, Y.; Marchand, W.; Rydval, M.; Matula, R.; Janda, P.; Begović, K.; Thom, D.; Fruleux, A.; Buechling, A.; Pavlin, J.; et al. Drought resistance of major tree species in the Czech Republic. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2024, 348, 109933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, H.; Wang, K.; Zeng, Z.; Du, H.; Zou, Z.; Xu, Y.; Zeng, F. Large-scale patterns in forest growth rates are mainly driven by climatic variables and stand characteristics. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 435, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Basu, S.; Stojanović, M.; Jevšenak, J.; Buras, A.; Kulhavý, J.; Hornová, H.; Světlík, J. Pedunculate oak is more resistant to drought and extreme events than narrow-leaved ash in Central European floodplain forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2024, 561, 121907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dupont-Leduc, L.; Power, H.; Fortin, M.; Schneider, R. Climate interacts with the trait structure of tree communities to influence forest productivity. J. Ecol. 2024, 112, 1758–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jevsenak, J.; Saražin, J. Pinus halepensis is more drought tolerant and more resistant to extreme events than Pinus nigra at a sub-Mediterranean flysch site. Trees 2023, 37, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kunert, N.; Hajek, P.; Hietz, P.; Morris, H.; Rosner, S.; Tholen, D. Summer temperatures reach the thermal tolerance threshold of photosynthetic decline in temperate conifers. Plant Biol. 2022, 24, 1254–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Soubeyrand, M.; Marchand, P.; Duchesne, L.; Bergeron, Y.; Gennaretti, F. Interactions between climate, soil and competition drive tree growth in Quebec forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2024, 555, 121731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vospernik, S.; Heym, M.; Pretzsch, H.; Pach, M.; Steckel, M.; Aldea, J.; Brazaitis, G.; Bravo-Oviedo, A.; Del Rio, M.; Löf, M.; et al. Tree species growth response to climate in mixtures of Quercus robur/Quercus petraea and Pinus sylvestris across Europe—A dynamic, sensitive equilibrium. For. Ecol. Manag. 2023, 530, 120753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vospernik, S.; Vigren, C.; Morin, X.; Toigo, M.; Bielak, K.; Brazaitis, G.; Bravo, F.; Heym, M.; Del Río, M.; Jansons, A.; et al. Can mixing Quercus robur and Quercus petraea with Pinus sylvestris compensate for productivity losses due to climate change? Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 942, 173342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Barber, V.A.; Juday, G.P.; Finney, B.P. Reduced growth of Alaskan white spruce in the twentieth century from temperature-induced drought stress. Nature 2000, 405, 668–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Linares, J.C.; Tíscar, P.A.; Camarero, J.J.; Taïqui, L.; Viñegla, B.; Seco, J.I.; Merino, J.; Carreira, J.A. Tree Growth Decline on Relict Western-Mediterranean Mountain Forests: Cause and Impacts; Nova Science Publishers Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 91–110. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yang, J.; Zhao, B.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Ma, F.; Fang, O. Linkage between spruce forest decline and cloud cover increase in the Qilian Mountains of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Trees 2023, 37, 1097–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ettinger, A.K.; Ford, K.R.; HilleRisLambers, J. Climate determines upper, but not lower, altitudinal range limits of Pacific Northwest conifers. Ecology 2011, 92, 1323–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bigler, C.; Gavin, D.G.; Gunning, C.; Veblen, T.T. Drought induces lagged tree mortality in a subalpine forest in the Rocky Mountains. Oikos 2007, 116, 1983–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Petrov, I.; Shushpanov, A.S.; Im, S.; Golyukov, A.S. Climatic aspect of fir (Abies sibirica Ledeb.) mortality in the Eastern Sayan Mountains. In Proceedings of the VII International Scientific Conference, Tomsk, Russia, 28–30 September 2020; pp. 94–96. [Google Scholar]
  27. Maher, C.T.; Nelson, C.R.; Larson, A.J.; Leys, B. Winter damage is more important than summer temperature for maintaining the krummholz growth form above alpine treeline. J. Ecol. 2019, 108, 1074–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tang, Y.; Du, E.; Guo, H.; Wang, Y.; Peñuelas, J.; Reich, P.B. Rapid migration of Mongolian oak into the southern Asian boreal forest. Global Chang. Biol. 2024, 30, e17002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Adams, J.M. Vegetation-Climate Interaction: How Vegetation Makes the Global Environment; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  30. Li, M.-Y.; Leng, Q.-N.; Hao, G.-Y. Contrasting patterns of radial growth rate between Larix principis-rupprechtii and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica along an elevational gradient are mediated by differences in xylem hydraulics. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 497, 119524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Taneda, H.; Funayama-Noguchi, S.; Mayr, S.; Goto, S. Elevational adaptation of morphological and anatomical traits by Sakhalin fir (Abies sachalinensis). Trees 2019, 34, 507–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, Q.; Shi, H.; He, R.; Liu, H.; Zhu, W.; Yu, D.; Zhang, Q.; Dang, H. Plastic and adaptive response of carbon allocation to temperature change in alpine treeline trees. Environ Exp Bot. 2023, 208, 105271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vicente-Serrano, S.M.; Beguería, S.; López-Moreno, J.I. A Multiscalar Drought Index Sensitive to Global Warming: The Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index. J. Clim. 2010, 23, 1696–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Balducci, L.; Deslauriers, A.; Giovannelli, A.; Beaulieu, M.; Delzon, S.; Rossi, S.; Rathgeber, C.B. How do drought and warming influence survival and wood traits of Picea mariana saplings? J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 377–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kelsey, K.C.; Redmond, M.D.; Barger, N.N.; Neff, J.C. Species, Climate and Landscape Physiography Drive Variable Growth Trends in Subalpine Forests. Ecosystems 2017, 21, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, X.; Pederson, N.; Chen, Z.; Lawton, K.; Zhu, C.; Han, S. Recent rising temperatures drive younger and southern Korean pine growth decline. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 649, 1105–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hogg, E.H.; Brandt, J.P.; Michaelian, M. Impacts of a regional drought on the productivity, dieback, and biomass of western Canadian aspen forests. Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38, 1373–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Worrall, J.J.; Egeland, L.; Eager, T.; Mask, R.A.; Johnson, E.W.; Kemp, P.A.; Shepperd, W.D. Rapid mortality of Populus tremuloides in southwestern Colorado, USA. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 255, 686–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Galiano, L.; Martínez-Vilalta, J.; Lloret, F. Drought-Induced Multifactor Decline of Scots Pine in the Pyrenees and Potential Vegetation Change by the Expansion of Co-occurring Oak Species. Ecosystems 2010, 13, 978–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vieira, J.; Nabais, C.; Campelo, F. Dry and hot years drive growth decline of Pinus halepensis at its southern range limit in the Moroccan High Atlas Mountains. Trees 2022, 36, 1585–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wilson, E.C.; Cousins, S.; Etter, D.R.; Humphreys, J.M.; Roloff, G.J.; Carter, N.H. Habitat and climatic associations of climate-sensitive species along a southern range boundary. Ecol. Evol. 2023, 13, e10083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Puchałka, R.; Paź-Dyderska, S.; Jagodziński, A.M.; Sádlo, J.; Vítková, M.; Klisz, M.; Koniakin, S.; Prokopuk, Y.; Netsvetov, M.; Nicolescu, V.-N.; et al. Predicted range shifts of alien tree species in Europe. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2023, 341, 109650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gazda, A.; Kościelniak, P.; Hardy, M.; Muter, E.; Kędra, K.; Bodziarczyk, J.; Frączek, M.; Chwistek, K.; Różański, W.; Szwagrzyk, J. Upward expansion of distribution ranges of tree species: Contrasting results from two national parks in Western Carpathians. Sci. Total. Environ. 2019, 653, 920–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Messaoud, Y.; Asselin, H.; Bergeron, Y.; Grondin, P. Competitive Advantage of Black Spruce Over Balsam Fir in Coniferous Boreal Forests of Eastern North America Revealed by Site Index. For. Sci. 2014, 60, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hörl, J.; Keller, K.; Yousefpour, R. Reviewing the performance of adaptive forest management strategies with robustness analysis. For. Policy Econ. 2020, 119, 102289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. van Tiel, N.; Fopp, F.; Brun, P.; van den Hoogen, J.; Karger, D.N.; Casadei, C.M.; Lyu, L.; Tuia, D.; Zimmermann, N.E.; Crowther, T.W.; et al. Regional uniqueness of tree species composition and response to forest loss and climate change. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 4375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Boonman, C.C.F.; Serra-Diaz, J.M.; Hoeks, S.; Guo, W.-Y.; Enquist, B.J.; Maitner, B.; Malhi, Y.; Merow, C.; Buitenwerf, R.; Svenning, J.-C. More than 17,000 tree species are at risk from rapid global change. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Beckage, B.; Osborne, B.; Gavin, D.G.; Pucko, C.; Siccama, T.; Perkins, T. A rapid upward shift of a forest ecotone during 40 years of warming in the Green Mountains of Vermont. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 4197–4202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kark, S. Effects of Ecotones on Biodiversity. In Reference Module in Life Sciences; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sarmoum, M.; Camarero, J.J.; Abdoun, F. Aridification increases growth resistance of Atlas cedar forests in NW Algeria. For. Ecol. Manag. 2024, 556, 121730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chapin, F.S.; McGuire, A.D.; Ruess, R.W.; Hollingsworth, T.N.; Mack, M.C.; Johnstone, J.F.; Kasischke, E.S.; Euskirchen, E.S.; Jones, J.B.; Jorgenson, M.T.; et al. Resilience of Alaska’s boreal forest to climatic change. Can. J. For. Res. 2010, 40, 1360–1370. [Google Scholar]
  52. Vitasse, Y.; Bottero, A.; Cailleret, M.; Bigler, C.; Fonti, P.; Gessler, A.; Lévesque, M.; Rohner, B.; Weber, P.; Rigling, A.; et al. Contrasting resistance and resilience to extreme drought and late spring frost in five major European tree species. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2019, 25, 3781–3792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Aitken, S.N.; Yeaman, S.; Holliday, J.A.; Wang, T.; Curtis-McLane, S. Adaptation, migration or extirpation: Climate change outcomes for tree populations. Evol. Appl. 2008, 1, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Vacek, Z.; Vacek, S.; Cukor, J. European forests under global climate change: Review of tree growth processes, crises and management strategies. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 332, 117353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kašpar, J.; Tumajer, J.; Altman, J.; Altmanová, N.; Čada, V.; Čihák, T.; Doležal, J.; Fibich, P.; Janda, P.; Kaczka, R.; et al. Major tree species of Central European forests differ in their proportion of positive, negative, and nonstationary growth trends. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2024, 30, e17146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lloyd, A.H.; Fastie, C.L. Spatial and Temporal Variability in the Growth and Climate Response of Treeline Trees in Alaska. Clim. Chang. 2002, 52, 481–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bosela, M.; Lukac, M.; Castagneri, D.; Sedmák, R.; Biber, P.; Carrer, M.; Konôpka, B.; Nola, P.; Nagel, T.A.; Popa, I.; et al. Contrasting effects of environmental change on the radial growth of co-occurring beech and fir trees across Europe. Sci. Total. Environ. 2017, 615, 1460–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Allen, C.D.; Breshears, D.D.; McDowell, N.G. On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die-off from hotter drought in the Anthropocene. Ecosphere 2015, 6, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Anderegg, W.R.L.; Schwalm, C.R.; Biondi, F.; Camarero, J.J.; Koch, G.W.; Litvak, M.; Ogle, K.; Shaw, J.D.; Shevliakova, E.; Williams, A.P.; et al. Pervasive drought legacies in forest ecosystems and their implications for carbon cycle models. Science 2015, 349, 528–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Karlsson, F. Climate Change and the Norway Spruce Treeline in the Central Scandinavian Mountains. Treeline Evolution, Tree Growth and a Blue Intensity Summer Temperature Reconstruction. Master Thesis, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  61. Goldblum, D.; Rigg, L.S. The Deciduous Forest—Boreal Forest Ecotone. Geogr. Compass 2010, 4, 701–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jensen, J. The Environmental Drivers of White Spruce Growth and Regeneration at Arctic Treeline in a Changing Climate. Ph.D. Thesis, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  63. Smith, W.K.; Germino, M.J.; Johnson, D.M.; Reinhardt, K. The Altitude of Alpine Treeline: A Bellwether of Climate Change Effects. Bot. Rev. 2009, 75, 163–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jochner, M.; Bugmann, H.; Nötzli, M.; Bigler, C. Tree growth responses to changing temperatures across space and time: A fine-scale analysis at the treeline in the Swiss Alps. Trees 2017, 32, 645–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Enderle, L.; Gribbe, S.; Muffler, L.; Weigel, R.; Hertel, D.; Leuschner, C. A warmer climate impairs the growth performance of Central Europe’s major timber species in lowland regions. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 941, 173665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Drobyshev, I.; Gewehr, S.; Berninger, F.; Bergeron, Y. Species specific growth responses of black spruce and trembling aspen may enhance resilience of boreal forest to climate change. J. Ecol. 2012, 101, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chagnon, C.; Wotherspoon, A.R.; Achim, A. Deciphering the black spruce response to climate variation across eastern Canada using a meta-analysis approach. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 520, 120375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Morin-Bernard, A.; Achim, A.; Coops, N.C.; White, J.C. Integration of tree-ring data, Landsat time series, and ALS-derived topographic variables to quantify growth declines in black spruce. For. Ecol. Manag. 2024, 557, 121765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Briceno-Elizondo, E.; Garcia-Gonzalo, J.; Peltola, H.; Matala, J.; Kellomäki, S. Sensitivity of growth of Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch to climate change and forest management in boreal conditions. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 232, 152–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pretzsch, H.; Schütze, G.; Biber, P. Drought can favour the growth of small in relation to tall trees in mature stands of Norway spruce and European beech. For. Ecosyst. 2018, 5, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dulamsuren, C.; Wommelsdorf, T.; Zhao, F.; Xue, Y.; Zhumadilov, B.Z.; Leuschner, C.; Hauck, M. Increased Summer Temperatures Reduce the Growth and Regeneration of Larix sibirica in Southern Boreal Forests of Eastern Kazakhstan. Ecosystems 2013, 16, 1536–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kharuk, V.I.; Petrov, I.A.; Golyukov, A.S.; Dvinskaya, M.L.; Im, S.T.; Shushpanov, A.S. Larch growth across thermal and moisture gradients in the Siberian Mountains. J. Mt. Sci. 2023, 20, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hansson, A.; Shulmeister, J.; Dargusch, P.; Hill, G. A review of factors controlling Southern Hemisphere treelines and the implications of climate change on future treeline dynamics. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2023, 332, 109375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Qi, X.; Treydte, K.; Saurer, M.; Fang, K.; An, W.; Lehmann, M.; Liu, K.; Wu, Z.; He, H.S.; Du, H.; et al. Contrasting water-use strategies to climate warming in white birch and larch in a boreal permafrost region. Tree Physiol. 2024, 44, tpae053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Messaoud, Y. Tree Growth in Relation to Climate Change: Understanding the Impact on Species Worldwide. Forests 2024, 15, 1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091601

AMA Style

Messaoud Y. Tree Growth in Relation to Climate Change: Understanding the Impact on Species Worldwide. Forests. 2024; 15(9):1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091601

Chicago/Turabian Style

Messaoud, Yassine. 2024. "Tree Growth in Relation to Climate Change: Understanding the Impact on Species Worldwide" Forests 15, no. 9: 1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091601

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop