Transformation of Modern Urban Park Based on User’s Spatial Perceived Preferences: A Case Study of Kowloon Walled City Park in Hong Kong
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Research Background
1.2. A Literature Review
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
- (1)
- Contemporary built-up area. This form of the park is usually located on both sides of the main road inside the park, including some new exhibition halls and antique buildings. The function of this area is to fully satisfy the needs of park users for visiting and touring. Generally, people prioritize the experience of the natural landscape and ecological environment in urban parks. However, the city represents a complex socio-economic and ecological system, and the planning and construction of urban parks cannot be separated from the socio-economic development of the city. Thus, the modern built-up area is undoubtedly an important part of the Kowloon Walled City Park, which meets the social needs of individuals for rest and recreation within the park, and this is one of the outstanding features of the contemporary Kowloon Walled City Park, which embodies the composite function of modern urban parks. Specifically, various types of buildings within the contemporary built-up area can be used to demonstrate the history of the Kowloon Walled City Park through tools such as exhibition panels and display tools; at the same time, during the demolition of the Kowloon Walled City, some of the remains of the Walled City were unearthed and preserved as exhibits to be placed in the exhibition halls. This area is an important spatial carrier of the socio-economic functions of Kowloon Walled City Park and can be regarded as a reflection of the modern city and its integration with the history of the park;
- (2)
- Historical relic area. This area highlights the historical remains and original buildings in Kowloon Walled City Park, including the ancient relics specially preserved during the demolition of Kowloon Walled City, which emphasizes the preservation of historical and humanistic elements. Official records show that during the demolition and excavation of the Kowloon Walled City, two granite stone fronts engraved with the words South Gate and Kowloon Walled City were unearthed at the South Gate (the main gate of the Walled City). Similarly, the remaining wall foundations of the Walled City and its gates, the remaining drainage ditch of the inner wall of the Walled City, as well as the three cannons, stone beams, couplets, and column bases have all been preserved during the renovation. These precious historical relics reflect the history of the Kowloon Walled City Park and enrich the connotation and cultural heritage of the park. Therefore, the historical relics area is undoubtedly one of the vital parts of the Kowloon Walled City Park;
- (3)
- Natural folklore area. This area integrates modern and traditional elements, as well as natural and humanistic environments, especially the integration of natural landscapes into the design of the park. Kowloon Walled City Park contains eight scenic spots, which have their own characteristics and beauty and are integrated with the overall style and design of the park. As a result, the park possesses a large number of man-made elements, particularly highlighting the folklore and cultural heritage behind the park. In fact, an important trend in contemporary urban regeneration is to work based on famous scenic spots and historical sites and to focus on designs that capitalize on people’s nostalgia and attachment to folklore and culture. For example, the Garden of the Chinese Zodiac is themed around the twelve zodiac animals and uses traditional sculpture art to showcase Chinese traditional culture. In other words, the natural folklore area is not limited to the preservation of historical relics themselves but places greater emphasis on the integration and display of folk elements. The effects of these folk customs can be based on historical relics or re-established, which is the biggest difference between this area and the historical religious area. Therefore, the characteristics of the natural folklore area are consistent with the cultural elements contained in the Kowloon Walled City Park, and thus make it uniquely attractive. In conclusion, an ideal city park needs to realize the coupling of ecological and social benefits, and this area is the embodiment of this concept;
- (4)
- Ecological conservation area. This area represents the natural landscape area in the Kowloon Walled City Park. At the beginning of the park’s design, it was constructed based on the design of the classical gardens in the Yangtze River region in the early Qing Dynasty, with pavilions, elegant buildings, and beautiful natural landscapes everywhere in the park. Before the demolition of the Kowloon Walled City and the design of the park, the staff of the Hong Kong Regional Architectural Services Department had conducted in-depth studies and went to Mainland China to conduct site visits, and finally selected the most appropriate design for the park to place more emphasis on the pristine natural ecological environment rather than showing too many artificial decorations and alterations. As a result, today’s Kowloon Walled City Park is in stark contrast to the dirty and unkempt Kowloon Walled City of the past. With the continuous progress of urbanization and the rapid growth of the urban population, people’s demand for a natural ecological environment in the city is also increasing. Therefore, the natural ecological environment of Kowloon Walled City Park is receiving more and more attention.
2.2. Investigation Methods
2.3. Statistical Research Methods
2.4. Statistical Methods
3. Results
3.1. Descriptive Statistical Analysis
3.2. Semantic Differential Analysis
3.3. Perceived Preference Analysis
3.4. Analysis of Influential Factors
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Questionnaire on User’s Spatial Perceived Preferences of Kowloon Walled City Park
Item | 1. Gender | 2. Age | 3. Education Status | 4. Occupation |
Options | 1 = Male 2 = Female | 1 = 20 years old and below 2 = 21–40 years old 3 = 40 years old and above | 1 = Primary school and below 2 = Middle school 3 = High school 4 = Bachelor 5 = Postgraduate and above | 1 = Corporate employee 2 = Government officer 3 = Freelance 4 = Retired and students |
Your choice | ||||
Item | 5. Family Size | 6. Per Capita Monthly Income | 7. Residence in Hong Kong | |
Options | 1 = 1 person 2 = 2 persons 3 = 3 persons 4 = 4 persons and above | 1 = 150,00 HKD and below 2 = 15,001–20,000 HKD 3 = 20,001–250,00 HKD 4 = 25,000 HKD and above | 1 = 5 years and below 2 = 5–10 years 3 = More than 10 years | |
Your choice |
Variable | Your Score (Please Tick the Corresponding Numbers) | Definition | ||
Orderliness | Disorderly | −2 −1 0 +1 +2 | Orderly | The degree of neatness and orderliness |
Spatiality | Closed | −2 −1 0 +1 +2 | Wide | The spaciousness and density |
Hue | Dark | −2 −1 0 +1 +2 | Clear | Brightness and contrast |
Color temperature | Cold | −2 −1 0 +1 +2 | Warm | Overall color tone |
Physical originality | Weak | −2 −1 0 +1 +2 | Strong | The degree of preservation of the physical authenticity |
Cultural authenticity | Weak | −2 −1 0 +1 +2 | Strong | The degree of preservation of cultural authenticity |
Architectural style | Modern | −2 −1 0 +1 +2 | Traditional | The tendency of the park’s architectural style |
Artificial traces | Light | −2 −1 0 +1 +2 | Heavy | The degree of artificial modification of the park’s interior |
Infrastructure | Poor | −2 −1 0 +1 +2 | Good | The degree of improvement of the park’s infrastructure |
Green Cover | Low | −2 −1 0 +1 +2 | High | The degree of the park’s green coverage |
Sense of belonging | Unfamiliar | −2 −1 0 +1 +2 | Familiar | The degree of belonging to and familiarity with the park |
Sense of security | Dangerous | −2 −1 0 +1 +2 | Safe | The degree of security and management |
Note: The evaluation scale was classified into five levels with five intervals between each adjective combination. The interval values were −2, −1, 0, 1, and 2 from left to right, and these were used as the scoring methods for evaluations. The higher the score of each evaluation item, the more inclined the evaluation factor is to the right-hand adjective; the lower the score, the more inclined the evaluation factor is to the left-hand adjective. |
Park Area | Contemporary Built-Up Area | Historical Relic Area | Natural Folklore Area | Ecological Conservation Area |
Your favorite type of park area (One choice out of four; please check the box corresponding to the option) | ||||
Comprehensive evaluation (Please fill in the number of the corresponding option in the box: 1 = Poor; 2 = Fair; 3 = Good; 4 = Very Good; 5 = Excellent) | ||||
Importance rating (Please fill in the number of the corresponding option in the box: 1 = Not at All Important; 2 = Somewhat Unimportant; 3 = Neutral; 4 = Somewhat Important; 5 = Extremely Important) | ||||
Performance rating (Please fill in the number of the corresponding option in the box: 1 = Poor; 2 = Fair; 3 = Good; 4 = Very Good; 5 = Excellent) |
References
- Allen, G.L. The organization of route knowledge. New Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev. 1982, 15, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, G.L.; Kirasic, K.C. Effects of the cognitive organization of route knowledge on judgments of macrospatial distance. Mem. Cogn. 1985, 13, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pipitone, J.M.; Jović, S. Urban green equity and COVID-19: Effects on park use and sense of belonging in New York City. Urban For. Urban Green. 2021, 65, 127338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghadiri, Z.; Mashhadi, A.; Timme, M.; Ghanbarnejad, F. Recreational mobility prior and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Commun. Phys. 2024, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Huang, Y.; Li, R.; Zhang, K. Historical redlining and park use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from big mobility data. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2024, 34, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irga, P.J.; Burchett, M.D.; Torpy, F.R. Does urban forestry have a quantitative effect on ambient air quality in an urban environment? Atmos. Environ. 2015, 120, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clark, K.H.; Nicholas, K.A. Introducing urban food forestry: A multifunctional approach to increase food security and provide ecosystem services. Landsc. Ecol. 2013, 28, 1649–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majumdar, S.; Deng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Pierskallab, C. Using contingent valuation to estimate the willingness of tourists to pay for urban forests: A study in Savannah, Georgia. Urban For. Urban Green. 2011, 10, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khataza, R. Preferences for urban greenspace functions during public health pandemics. Empirical evidence from Malawi. Urban. Sustain. Soc. 2024, 1, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pröbstl-Haider, U.; Gugerell, K.; Maruthaveeran, S. COVID-19 and outdoor recreation–lessons learned? Introduction to the special issue on “outdoor recreation and COVID-19: Its effects on people, parks and landscapes”. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 2023, 41, 100583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ugolini, F.; Massetti, L.; Calaza-Martínez, P.; Cariñanos, P.; Dobbs, C.; Ostoić, S.K. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use and perceptions of urban green space: An international exploratory study. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 56, 126888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dwyer, J.E.; Nowak, D.J.; Watson, G.W. Future directions for urban forestry research in the United States. J. Arboric. 2002, 28, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaplan, R. The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1993, 26, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ode, A.; Fry, G.L.A. Visual aspects in urban woodland management. Urban For. Urban Green. 2002, 1, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peter, S. Wilderness & the American Mind. Kenyon Rev. 2001, 23, 74–75. [Google Scholar]
- Kaiser, F.G.; Wolfing, S.; Fuhrer, U. Environmental attitude and ecological behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 1999, 19, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Brindley, P.G.; Lange, E. Comparison of urban green space usage and preferences: A case study approach of China and the UK. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2024, 249, 105112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bradford, J.B. Ecology of Hierarchical Landscapes: From Theory to Application; Chen, J., Saunders, S.C., Brosofske, K.D., Crow, T.R., Eds.; Nova Science Publisher: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Tuan, Y.F. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes End Values; Prentice-Hall Inc.: Engtewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Steinberg, T. American Green-the Obsessive Quest for the Perfect Lawn; W.W. Norton & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Robbins, P.; Birkenholtz, T. Turfgrass revolution: Measuring the expansion of the American lawn. Land. Use. Pol. 2003, 20, 181–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maas, J.; Verheij, R.A. Are health benefits of physical activity in natural environments used in primary care by general practitioners in The Netherlands? Urban For. Urban Green. 2007, 6, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nassauer, J.I. Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landsc. J. 1995, 14, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, C.A. Landscape water use in phoenix. Desert Plants 2001, 17, 26–31. [Google Scholar]
- Kaczyńska, M. Present security of the neighborhood urban parks considering SARS-CoV-2 potential spreading–A case study in Ursynów district in Warsaw. Acta Sci. Pol. Adm. Locorum. 2022, 21, 355–377. [Google Scholar]
- Brody, S.D.; Highfield, W.; Alston, L. Does location matter? Measuring environmental perceptions of creeks in two San Antonio watersheds. Environ. Behav. 2004, 36, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han KeTsung, H.K. The effect of nature and physical activity on emotions and attention while engaging in green exercise. Urban For. Urban Green. 2017, 24, 5–13. [Google Scholar]
- Hou, Y.; Qu, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Shen, J.; Wen, Y. Residents’ Spatial Image Perception of Urban Green Space through Cognitive Mapping: The Case of Beijing, China. Forests 2021, 12, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, B.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J. Preference to home landscape: Wildness or neatness? Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 99, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singleton, R.; Straits, B.C. Approaches to Social Research; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999; p. 244. [Google Scholar]
- Adler, N.J.; Campbell, N.; Laurent, A. In Search of Appropriate Methodology: From Outside the People’s Republic of China Looking In. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 1989, 20, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.Z.; Liu, W.; Li, Y.J. Spatial Distribution of Residential Space and Residents’ Residential Space Preferences in Beijing. Geogr. Res. 2003, 22, 751–759. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, L.; Han, X.; He, J.; Jung, T. Measuring residents’ perceptions of city streets to inform better street planning through deep learning and space syntax. ISPRS 2022, 190, 215–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lau, K.K.L.; Yung, C.C.Y.; Tan, Z. Usage and perception of urban green space of older adults in the high-density city of Hong Kong. Urban For. Urban Green. 2021, 64, 127251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.W.; Wei, S.M.; Yao, R. A study on the division of garden space types and quantification of landscape perceptual characteristics. J. Northwest For. Coll. 2012, 27, 221–229. [Google Scholar]
- Llinares, C.; Page, A. Application of product differential semantics to quantify purchaser perceptions in housing assessment. Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 2488–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y. Research on Urban Spatial Perception Based on SD Method; Tongji University: Shanghai, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, D.; Zhang, Y. A study on the spatial perception of Shanghai streets based on the semantic difference method. J. Tongji Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2011, 39, 1000–1006. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, M.X.; Shao, L.; Lin, Y.Y. Differences in spatial perception of towns between foreign tourists and locals—A case study of western towns in Nanhai District, Foshan City, Guangdong Province. Tour. Sci. 2013, 27, 46–58. [Google Scholar]
- Li, T.; Xu, H.; Sun, H. Spatial Patterns and Multi-Dimensional Impact Analysis of Urban Street Quality Perception under Multi-Source Data: A Case Study of Wuchang District in Wuhan, China. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 11740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, K.W.; Mak, C.M.; Wong, H.M. Effects of environmental sound quality on soundscape preference in a public urban space. Appl. Acoust. 2021, 171, 107570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Addas, A.; Maghrabi, A.; Goldblatt, R. Public open spaces evaluation using importance-performance analysis (IPA) in Saudi Universities: The case of King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah. Sustainability 2021, 13, 915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babalola, T.O. Adopting Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) model to assess land governance in the peri-urban areas of Ibadan, Nigeria. Land Use Policy 2023, 133, 106850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abello, R.P.; Bernaldez, F.G. Landscape preference and personality. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1986, 13, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maloney, M.P.; Ward, M.P. Ecology: Let’s hear from the people: An objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. Am. Psychol. 1973, 28, 583–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arcury, T.A.; Scollay, S.J.; Johnson, T.P. Public Environmental Knowledge: A Statewide Survey. Environ. Educ. 1987, 18, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wall, G. General versus specific environmental concern: A Western Canadian case. Environ. Behav. 1995, 27, 294–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribe, R.G. The aesthetics of forestry: What has empirical preference research taught us? Environ. Manag. 1989, 13, 55–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sever, I. Importance-performance analysis: A valid management tool? Tour. Manag. 2015, 48, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ewert, A.; Baker, D. Standing for where you sit: An exploratory analysis of the relationship between academic major and environment beliefs. Environ. Behav. 2001, 33, 687–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Evaluation Aspects | Evaluation Factor | Interpretation |
---|---|---|
Orderliness | Disorderly–Orderly | The degree of neatness and orderliness |
Spatiality | Closed–Wide | The spaciousness and density |
Hue | Dark–Clear | Brightness and contrast |
Color temperature | Cold–Warm | Overall color tone |
Physical originality | Weak–Strong | The degree of preservation of the physical authenticity |
Cultural authenticity | Weak–Strong | The degree of preservation of cultural authenticity |
Architectural style | Modern–Traditional | The tendency of the park’s architectural style |
Artificial traces | Light–Heavy | The degree of artificial modification of the park’s interior |
Infrastructure | Poor–Good | The degree of improvement of the park’s infrastructure |
Green cover | Low–High | The degree of the park’s green coverage |
Sense of belonging | Unfamiliar–Familiar | The degree of belonging to and familiarity with the park |
Sense of security | Dangerous–Safe | The degree of security and management |
Variables | Explanation | Cronbach’s Alpha |
---|---|---|
Park area | 1 = Contemporary built-up area; 2 = Historical relic area; 3 = Natural folklore area; 4 = Ecological conservation area | - |
Gender | 1 = Male; 2 = Female | 0.82 |
Age | 1 = 20 years old and below; 2 = 21–40 years old; 3 = 40 years old and above | 0.75 |
Education status | 1 = Primary school and below; 2 = Middle school; 3 = High school; 4 = Bachelor; 5 = Postgraduate and above | 0.78 |
Occupation | 1 = Corporate employee; 2 = Government officer; 3 = Freelance; 4 = Retired and students | 0.81 |
Family size | 1 = 1 person; 2 = 2 persons; 3 = 3 persons; 4 = 4 persons and above | 0.77 |
Per capita monthly income | 1 = 15,000 HKD and below; 2 = 15,001–20,000 HKD; 3 = 20,001–25,000 HKD; 4 = 25,000 HKD and above | 0.74 |
Residence in Hong Kong | 1 = 5 years and below; 2 = 5–10 years; 3 = More than 10 years | 0.76 |
Variables | Attributes | Number | Frequency (%) | Variables | Attributes | Number | Frequency (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 192 | 47.4 | Retired and students | 93 | 23 | |
Female | 213 | 52.6 | Family size | 1 person | 65 | 16 | |
Age | 20 years old and below | 5 | 1.2 | 2 persons | 71 | 17.5 | |
21–40 years old | 80 | 19.8 | 3 person | 173 | 42.7 | ||
40 years old and above | 320 | 79 | 4 persons and above | 96 | 23.7 | ||
Education Status | Primary school and below | 166 | 41 | Monthly income per capita | 15,000 HKD and below | 32 | 7.9 |
Middle school | 84 | 20.7 | 15,001–20,000 HKD | 101 | 24.9 | ||
High school | 42 | 10.4 | 20,001–25,000 HKD | 87 | 21.5 | ||
Bachelor | 91 | 22.5 | 25,000 HKD and above | 185 | 45.7 | ||
Postgraduate and above | 22 | 5.4 | Residence in Hong Kong | 5 years and below | 20 | 4.9 | |
Occupation | Company employee | 26 | 6.4 | 5–10 years | 282 | 69.6 | |
Government officer | 183 | 45.2 | More than 10 years | 103 | 25.4 | ||
Freelance | 103 | 25.4 |
Evaluation Aspects | Evaluation Factor | Contemporary Built-Up Area | Historical Relic Area | Natural Folklore Area | Ecological Conservation Area | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Orderliness | Disorderly–Orderly | 3.158 | 3.018 | 2.961 | 2.805 | 2.990 |
Spatiality | Closed–Wide | 2.684 | 2.875 | 3.052 | 3.244 | 2.978 |
Hue | Dark–Clear | 2.908 | 3.071 | 2.953 | 3.195 | 2.985 |
Color temperature | Cold–Warm | 2.803 | 2.750 | 3.151 | 3.341 | 3.049 |
Physical originality | Weak–Strong | 2.908 | 3.000 | 3.159 | 3.293 | 3.104 |
Cultural authenticity | Weak–Strong | 2.789 | 3.054 | 2.957 | 2.878 | 2.931 |
Architectural style | Modern–Traditional | 2.684 | 3.286 | 3.091 | 2.902 | 3.022 |
Artificial traces | Light–Heavy | 3.342 | 3.125 | 3.052 | 2.780 | 3.089 |
Infrastructure | Poor–Good | 3.368 | 3.143 | 3.056 | 3.171 | 3.138 |
Green cover | Low–High | 2.882 | 2.804 | 3.284 | 3.439 | 3.158 |
Sense of belonging | Unfamiliar–Familiar | 3.132 | 3.036 | 3.198 | 2.780 | 3.121 |
Sense of security | Dangerous–Safe | 3.289 | 2.946 | 3.220 | 2.805 | 3.153 |
Area Type | Direct Preference Choice | Average Preference Score | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Number N = 405 | Frequency (%) | Average Score for Importance | Average Score for Performance | |
Contemporary built-up area | 76 | 18.800 | 3.066 | 2.987 |
Historical relic area | 56 | 13.800 | 2.821 | 3.304 |
Natural folklore area | 232 | 57.300 | 2.879 | 3.315 |
Ecological preservation area | 41 | 10.100 | 3.195 | 3.073 |
Variables | Model Fit Condition | Likelihood Ratio Test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
The −2 Log-Likelihood of the Simplified Model | Chi Square | Degree of Freedom | Significance | |
Intercept | 636.373 | 0.000 | 0 | - |
Gender | 639.757 | 3.383 | 3 | 0.336 |
Age | 656.184 | 19.811 | 6 | 0.003 |
Education Status | 659.520 | 23.147 | 12 | 0.027 |
Occupation | 713.281 | 76.908 | 9 | 0.000 |
Household Size | 1014.993 | 378.620 | 9 | 0.000 |
Per capita monthly income | 651.828 | 15.454 | 9 | 0.079 |
Residence in HK | 649.049 | 12.676 | 6 | 0.048 |
Variable | Multinomial Logit Choice Models (N = 405) | Perceived Preference | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ln(P1/P4) | ln(P2/P4) | ln(P3/P4) | |||||
B | Exp(B) | B | Exp(B) | B | Exp(B) | ||
Intercept | −0.542 | - | −7.318 | - | 1.642 | - | - |
Gender: male | −0.511 | 0.6 | −0.789 | 0.454 | −0.663 * | 0.515 | Ecological preservation area |
Age: 21–40 years old | −0.313 | 0.731 | −4.327 | 0.013 | −0.086 | 0.918 | Ecological preservation area |
Education: primary school and below | 1.926 ** | 6.865 | 6.592 | 729.044 | 1.5 ** | 4.483 | Historical relic area |
Education: middle school | 1.844 ** | 6.323 | 5.885 | 359.747 | 0.638 | 1.893 | Historical relic area |
Education: high school | 0.952 | 2.591 | 3.833 | 46.189 | 0.666 | 1.946 | Historical relic area |
Education: bachelor’s degree | 2.227 ** | 9.268 | 6.166 | 476.181 | 1.482 ** | 4.404 | Historical relic area |
Occupation: company employee | −1.453 | 0.234 | −4.831 | 0.008 | −1.068 | 0.344 | Ecological preservation area |
Occupation: government officer | −0.734 | 0.48 | 0.716 | 2.046 | −0.108 | 0.898 | Historical relic area |
Occupation: freelance | −0.578 | 0.561 | −0.473 | 0.623 | −0.432 | 0.649 | Ecological preservation area |
Family size: 1 person | 1.057 | 2.878 | 1.558 * | 4.749 | 0.54 | 1.716 | Historical relic area |
Family size: 2 persons | 1.578 ** | 4.844 | 1.275 | 3.579 | 0.105 | 1.11 | Contemporary built-up area |
Family size: 3 persons | −0.154 | 0.857 | −0.342 | 0.71 | −0.493 | 0.611 | Ecological preservation area |
Monthly income per capita: 15,000 HKD and below | 5.405 | 222.593 | 3.146 | 23.25 | 4.689 | 108.709 | Contemporary built-up area |
Monthly income per capita: 15,001–20,000 HKD | −0.602 | 0.548 | −0.8 | 0.449 | −0.301 | 0.74 | Ecological preservation area |
Monthly income per capita: 20,001–25,000 HKD | −0.12 | 0.887 | −0.266 | 0.766 | −0.35 | 0.704 | Ecological preservation area |
Residence in HK: 5 years and below | 1.7 | 5.476 | 0.67 | 1.955 | 1.167 | 3.212 | Contemporary built-up area |
Residence in HK: 5–10 years | 0.081 | 1.084 | 2.393 ** | 10.951 | −0.077 | 0.926 | Historical relic area |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Di, S.; Chen, Z.; Ren, Z.; Ding, T.; Zhao, Z.; Hou, Y.; Chen, Z. Transformation of Modern Urban Park Based on User’s Spatial Perceived Preferences: A Case Study of Kowloon Walled City Park in Hong Kong. Forests 2024, 15, 1637. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091637
Di S, Chen Z, Ren Z, Ding T, Zhao Z, Hou Y, Chen Z. Transformation of Modern Urban Park Based on User’s Spatial Perceived Preferences: A Case Study of Kowloon Walled City Park in Hong Kong. Forests. 2024; 15(9):1637. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091637
Chicago/Turabian StyleDi, Shuyi, Zimeng Chen, Zhipeng Ren, Tianyi Ding, Zheng Zhao, Yilei Hou, and Zejin Chen. 2024. "Transformation of Modern Urban Park Based on User’s Spatial Perceived Preferences: A Case Study of Kowloon Walled City Park in Hong Kong" Forests 15, no. 9: 1637. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091637
APA StyleDi, S., Chen, Z., Ren, Z., Ding, T., Zhao, Z., Hou, Y., & Chen, Z. (2024). Transformation of Modern Urban Park Based on User’s Spatial Perceived Preferences: A Case Study of Kowloon Walled City Park in Hong Kong. Forests, 15(9), 1637. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091637