1. Introduction
Soil is a heterogeneous and dynamic system shaped by the intricate interactions of geological, biological, climatic, and topographical factors [
1,
2]. Among these, soil nutrients are fundamental to ecosystem health, agricultural productivity, and environmental sustainability. Nutrients such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and soil organic matter (SOM) are critical for plant growth, influencing crop yields and maintaining the vitality of natural ecosystems. And the spatial distribution of these nutrients is inherently variable, governed by natural processes like soil formation, weathering, and climate patterns, along with anthropogenic activities, particularly human land use practices [
3,
4]. Understanding this variability is crucial for optimizing agricultural practices, refining fertilization strategies, and mitigating environmental degradation and so on [
5,
6].
Recent advancements in soil nutrients research, facilitated by technological progress in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and geostatistical methods, have provided valuable insights into nutrient cycling and soil management [
3,
7,
8]. Technological progress, particularly in GIS and geostatistical methods, has enhanced the ability to map and analyze soil nutrient distribution at a high resolution [
9,
10,
11]. Techniques such as semi-variance analysis and Kriging interpolation turned to be standard tools for quantifying spatial variability in soil properties, enabling detailed and accurate spatial assessments [
12,
13,
14]. These methods have been extensively used to study physical soil properties, including bulk density and water retention [
15]. These studies have already facilitated the creation of high-resolution soil maps that are essential for precision agriculture and land management worldwide [
16,
17]. Although much of the existing research has focused on the spatial variability of physical soil properties, the spatial variability of key soil nutrients—such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium—remain underexplored [
18]. Nutrient variability is influenced not only by inherent soil characteristics and natural processes, but also by human activities, especially land use practices. Despite the recognized importance of land use in shaping nutrient distribution, few studies have comprehensively examined the impact of land use on soil nutrients variability in ecologically sensitive regions. This gap is particularly evident in regions where soil fertility has already been compromised. Thus, it is urgent and critical to study soil nutrient variability in ecologically sensitive regions.
The Nanxiong Basin in the Nanling Mountains is one such significant ecologically sensitive region characterized by nutrient-deficient soils, the so called “red-bed region” in southern China. These red-bed soils are derived from red continental clastic sedimentary rocks and are typically low in essential nutrients, making them highly vulnerable to both climatic and anthropogenic pressures. Furthermore, intensive human activities, such as deforestation, unsustainable agricultural practices, and urbanization, exacerbate the vulnerability of these soils, leading to severe degradation issues like soil erosion, vegetation loss, and the formation of “red-layer deserts” [
19,
20]. Thus, the ecological importance of the Nanling Mountains is underscored by their role in biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services. This formed a critical component of China’s “Two Screens and Three Belts” ecological security framework [
21]. Despite its importance, few research pieces have studied the spatial variability of soil nutrients in the Nanxiong “red-bed region”, especially in relation to different land use systems [
20,
22].
The soil variability knowledge gap is particularly pronounced in Nanxiong red-bed soils due to their sensitivity to environmental changes and human disturbances. These red-bed soils are prone to rapid degradation under adverse conditions. Thus, the study of the nutrient dynamics is essential for effective soil conservation and land management in this region. Previous studies conducted on purple soils in the region have provided valuable insights into soil properties and nutrient distribution [
22,
23]. However, these studies neglected the comprehensive analysis of other essential nutrients and the influence of varied land use practices on nutrient dynamics. For instance, Yan et al. [
24] examined the variability of soil organic matter in red bed soils, but their research did not fully address other critical nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus, nor did it consider the impact of different land use patterns on these nutrients. This study investigated the spatial distribution and variability of key soil nutrients—nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and soil organic matter—across different land use types in the Nanxiong Basin of the Nanling Mountains. Through employing advanced geostatistical techniques such as principal component analysis (PCA) and Ordinary Kriging (OK), the study aimed to assess how environmental factors and land use practices interact to shape nutrient distribution in this ecologically vulnerable region.
In sum, the specific objectives of the study are as following: (1) to characterize the basic properties of soil nutrients in the region, (2) to analyze the spatial distribution patterns of these nutrients across various land use types, and (3) to explore the interactions between soil nutrients and environmental factors. Through addressing these objectives, the study sought to provide a comprehensive understanding of the drivers behind soil nutrients variability in red-bed soils. The findings are expected to offer critical insights into the mechanisms that govern nutrient distribution, thereby informing evidence-based recommendations for sustainable land management and ecological restoration. Specifically, this study aims to inform soil fertility management practices, enhance sustainable agricultural practices, and provide guidance for land use planning and ecological restoration efforts. These efforts are essential for mitigating soil erosion, improving soil fertility, and promoting the sustainable functioning of ecosystems in the region.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
The Nanxiong Basin, located in northeastern Shaoguan City, Guangdong Province, China, is an intermountain basin within the eastern Nanling Mountains (
Figure 1). Covering approximately 1800 square kilometers, about 1240 square kilometers are characterized by red bed formations. These red-bed deposits, dating from the Late Cretaceous to the Paleogene, range in thickness from 2525 to 7250 m. The red-bed rocks are highly susceptible to cracking upon dehydration and unstable when exposed to water, leading to severe vegetation degradation [
24]. Additionally, improper land clearing has intensified soil erosion and ecological deterioration, resulting in “red-layer desert” landscapes [
19]. Consequently, the Nanxiong Basin has been designated as a key national ecological protection zone.
Situated within a subtropical monsoon humid climate zone, the region’s climate significantly influences soil distribution. The area primarily comprises four soil types: yellow soil, red soil, red calcareous soil, and purple soil, each exhibiting distinct spatial distributions influenced by latitude and topography. Vertically, soil types transition with elevation: below 200 m, purple soil predominates with interspersed Quaternary red soil; between 200 and 300 m, hilly red soils derived from red gravel, sandstone, and granite are prevalent; from 300 to 700 m, mountainous red soils dominate; and above 700 m, red soils mix with yellow soils.
Vegetation in the Nanxiong Basin is diverse, including evergreen and mixed forests of temperate and warm–temperate species, various cold-resistant plants, immature pine forests, grasslands, barren areas, and cultivated crops (
Figure 2). This mosaic of soil types and climatic conditions creates a unique environment, making the Nanxiong Basin ideal for studying the spatial distribution of soil nutrients and their interactions with land use and ecological factors.
The combination of nutrient-deficient red-bed soils and varied land use practices—forestland, cropland, grassland, and bare land—presents significant challenges for soil conservation and sustainable management. Research in this area is critical for informing effective soil management and ecological restoration strategies, both for the Nanxiong Basin and similar red-bed regions globally.
2.2. Sample Collection
All field research was conducted in 2020, including a preliminary field investigation in July 2020, which aimed to select undisturbed natural tidal flat wetland vegetation areas for this study. These areas, unaffected by human activities, exhibited minimal changes in soil nutrient content over time [
18], allowing for a focus on spatial variations in soil nutrient levels. Elevation measurements were referenced to the Geodetic Coordinate System 2000 (GCS 2000) ellipsoid. Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) positioning systems were utilized to record surface elevations at 10-m intervals across the study area.
A total of 152 sampling points were established, representing various land use types. The sampling grid was designed to account for variations in land use, micro-elevation, surface moisture, and vegetation density. At each sampling location, vegetation was assessed using 1 m × 1 m quadrats, and detailed vegetation data were recorded. The GPS coordinates of each sampling point were accurately noted. Soil samples were collected using soil augers at each of the 152 locations. Three soil replicates were taken from a depth of 0–20 cm at each point, thoroughly mixed, and combined to form a single composite sample of approximately 1 kg. These composite samples were then divided using the quartering method and sealed in bags for subsequent laboratory analysis.
This systematic sampling approach ensures comprehensive coverage of the study area, capturing the spatial variability of key soil nutrients—nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and soil organic matter—across different land use types. The methodology facilitates robust analysis of nutrient distribution patterns and their environmental drivers, supporting the study’s objectives of informing sustainable land management and ecological restoration strategies.
2.3. Laboratory Analysis
Soil pH was measured using a pH meter (Mettler Toledo S210-S) with a 1:2.5 soil-to-water (
w/
v) ratio, following the protocol of Sheng et al. [
25]. Soil organic matter (SOM) content was determined using the potassium dichromate oxidation method with external heating, as described by Teng et al. [
26], and the measurement was performed using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-1800), manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation, located in Kyoto, Japan. Total nitrogen (TN) was quantified via the micro-Kjeldahl digestion, distillation, and titration method, using a Kjeldahl distillation unit (Gerhardt Vapodest 30S), manufactured by Gerhardt, located in Königswinter, Germany. Total phosphorus (TP) concentrations (g kg
−1) were obtained through alkaline digestion using 2 g NaOH and 0.25 g soil (<0.25 mm) at 400 °C for 15 min, followed by a second heating at 720 °C for 15 min. Phosphorus was then measured using the molybdate colorimetric method [
27], and the measurement was performed using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-1800). Total potassium (TK) was determined by digesting soil samples in sodium hydroxide and analyzing them with an atomic absorption spectrometer (Agilent 240FS), manufactured by Agilent Technologies, located in Santa Clara, CA, USA. [
28]. Hydrolyzed nitrogen was quantified using the alkaline dissociation diffusion method [
29]. Available phosphorus (AP) was extracted using the standard Olsen method, while available potassium (AK) was measured using the ammonium acetate extraction method [
25].
All soil samples were prepared by air-drying, sieving through a 2 mm mesh, and homogenizing before analysis. Analytical procedures were conducted in triplicate to ensure precision and reproducibility. Quality control measures included the use of standard reference materials and blank samples to validate the accuracy of the measurements. Data obtained from the laboratory analyses were subsequently used to assess the spatial variability of soil nutrients and their relationships with environmental and land use factors.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics were conducted using Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics 27. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) test was employed to assess data normality. For datasets that deviated from normality, logarithmic or Box–Cox transformations were applied to approximate a normal distribution. Spatial variability of soil nutrients was analyzed using Ordinary Kriging interpolation within the “Geostatistics” module of ArcGIS 10.7. Semivariogram functions were modeled and optimized using GS+ 9.0 software, following the semivariance formula:
where
N (
h) represents the number of pairs of data points separated by a lag distance
h, is the value of the distance equal to
h of the point logarithm; and
Z (
xi) and
Z (
xi +
h) are the values at positions
xi and
xi +
h, respectively.
Key semivariogram parameters include the nugget effect (
C0), representing variability at very short distances and internal randomness; the range (a), indicating the spatial extent over which variability is significant; and the sill (
C0/(
C0 +
C), reflecting the total variation intensity. The ratio (
C0/(
C0 +
C) quantifies the proportion of random versus autocorrelated spatial heterogeneity, following Cambardella et al. [
30]: values <25% indicate strong spatial dependence, 25%–75% moderate dependence, and >75% weak dependence. The coefficient of determination (
R2) was used to evaluate the fit between the variogram model and actual data, with higher values indicating better model fit. To validate the accuracy of the semivariogram models, cross-validation was conducted using a leave-one-out method. In this process, one data point was omitted from the dataset at a time, and the semivariogram model was used to predict the omitted value. The predicted values were then compared to the observed values to evaluate the model’s performance. The root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) were calculated to assess the prediction accuracy. A smaller RMSE and MAE indicated a better model fit. This cross-validation process ensures that the semivariogram model is robust and reliable in capturing the spatial variability of the soil nutrient data.
Redundancy analysis (RDA) was performed using Canoco 5.0, with soil physical properties and micro-topographical factors as explanatory variables and soil nutrients as response variables. This multivariate technique elucidates the relationships between soil nutrients and environmental factors, identifying key drivers of nutrient variability.
Ordinary Kriging interpolation facilitated the estimation of soil nutrient levels at unsampled locations, enabling the creation of continuous soil quality maps. The Kriging estimator is defined as
where
Z (
x0) is the estimated value at the unsampled location
x0, and
Z (
xi) are the measured values at neighboring sampled points
xi, and
λi are the weights determined by the Kriging model.
This comprehensive statistical framework ensures an accurate spatial analysis of soil nutrient distribution, supporting the study’s objectives to elucidate the drivers of nutrient variability and inform sustainable land management practices.
4. Discussion
4.1. The Distribution Characteristics and Spatial Variability of Soil Nutrients at Nanxiong Basin
This study examined the spatial variability of key soil nutrients in the Nanxiong Basin, focusing on the influence of both natural ecological processes and anthropogenic activities. The results highlight the complex interplay between regional environmental factors—such as topography, soil properties, and climate—and human influences, including land use changes and fertilization practices. The observed patterns are not only reflective of natural ecological processes, such as soil organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling, but are also reflective of human activities, including land use changes and fertilization practices. These dual influences lead to marked spatial heterogeneity in key soil nutrients, as evidenced by the variability coefficients, semivariogram parameters, and spatial distribution trends discussed previously.
The pronounced spatial variability in available phosphorus and potassium, for instance, underscores the impact of uneven fertilizer application, differences in vegetation cover, and localized soil management practices. This is consistent with findings from Bian et al. [
31], who documented significant spatial heterogeneity in soil nutrients across agricultural regions due to variable anthropogenic inputs and distinct topographic conditions. Compared to their study, an advance in this research is the integration of semivariogram analysis to elucidate the spatial dependency and random variability of soil nutrients. The nugget-to-sill ratios and spatial ranges derived from the semivariograms provided critical insights into the underlying processes that shape soil nutrients distribution. For instance, the high nugget-to-sill ratios for soil organic matter and available potassium suggest substantial influence from anthropogenic activities, such as non-uniform fertilizer application and localized cultivation methods. This is further corroborated by Haefele et al. [
32], who emphasized that anthropogenic factors often contribute to the random variability observed in nutrient distributions within intensively managed agricultural areas. Moreover, the spatial distribution patterns presented in this study offer a robust framework for precision soil management. The clear gradient in soil organic matter content from northeast to southwest, combined with the scattered hotspots of total nitrogen and phosphorus, points to a need for site-specific interventions. For example, areas with high soil organic matter and total nitrogen concentrations may benefit from reduced fertilizer inputs, while regions with nutrient deficiencies may require carefully calibrated supplementation.
The implications of these findings could extend beyond local agricultural management. The identified spatial variability patterns serve as valuable references for regional land use planning and sustainable development. By integrating spatial nutrient data with topographic and land use information, policymakers and land managers can develop tailored strategies to optimize nutrient distribution, improve soil fertility, and promote long-term ecosystem health. This approach not only supports sustainable agricultural production but also contributes to broader environmental goals, such as mitigating soil erosion and reducing nutrient runoff into adjacent ecosystems.
In this study, we also considered the isotropy or anisotropy of the models used to describe soil nutrient spatial patterns. Isotropy implies uniform variability in all directions, while anisotropy suggests directional differences, often influenced by factors such as topography, hydrology, and vegetation. Our semivariogram analysis revealed that some soil nutrients (
Figure 4), like total phosphorus, exhibited anisotropic behavior, with more pronounced variability in specific directions. This was likely influenced by topographic and hydrological conditions. Nutrients like available nitrogen and potassium, affected by vegetation and topographic gradients, showed anisotropic spatial patterns, while total nitrogen, with a more homogeneous distribution, was better modeled isotropically. Considering isotropy or anisotropy enhances the accuracy of spatial analysis, enabling more targeted land management and sustainable nutrient practices.
4.2. Relationship Between Soil Nutrients and Environmental Impact Factors Across Different Land Use Types at Nanxiong Basin
The spatial variability in and distribution of soil nutrients across forestland, cropland, grassland, and bare land reveal important interactions between natural and anthropogenic factors. Principal component analysis (PCA) biplots (
Figure 6) illustrate complex relationships among soil nutrients (e.g., total nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium) and environmental variables (e.g., elevation, slope, soil moisture, bulk density, capillary water capacity), showing distinct spatial patterns across land use types. This research extends previous studies by highlighting how specific drivers regulate soil nutrients dynamics under different land use conditions.
In forestlands (
Figure 6a), total nitrogen, soil organic matter, and available nitrogen strongly correlate with elevation and slope, emphasizing the role of topographic factors. The correlation between soil organic matter and total nitrogen mirrors findings from Liu et al. [
33] and Guan et al. [
34], who identified topography as a key factor in nutrient dynamics. This study further reveals how slope-driven erosion and soil moisture interact to regulate phosphorus and potassium availability, highlighting the complex interplay of structural and hydrological factors. In contrast, croplands exhibit nutrient patterns strongly influenced by soil moisture, reflecting the role of irrigation and fertilization in nutrient availability. However, unlike forestlands, where topography governs nutrient distribution, croplands show evidence of anthropogenic homogenization, suggesting that land management practices, such as organic amendments and lime applications, significantly alter nutrient patterns. Grasslands present a unique relationship between topography and hydrology in regulating nutrient distribution. Available nitrogen, total potassium, and available potassium correlate with capillary water capacity and soil moisture, indicating that water availability is a key determinant of nutrient cycling. These findings confirmed results from Chen et al. [
35], who emphasized the role of soil moisture in nutrient availability in semi-arid grasslands. However, this study advances knowledge by demonstrating that slope-driven processes, such as erosion and runoff, also significantly influence phosphorus distribution, thus underscoring the dual impact of topography and hydrology. In bare land, the absence of vegetation shifts the factors governing nutrient distribution. Available nitrogen, total nitrogen, and soil organic matter correlate strongly with slope and bulk density, highlighting the role of structural factors in nutrient variability. Notably, the study identifies weak correlations between phosphorus and soil physical properties, suggesting the influence of microclimatic or historical land use conditions on nutrient availability.
When comparing nutrient distribution across land use types, elevation, slope, and soil moisture emerge as dominant drivers in vegetated systems such as forestland and grassland. In croplands, anthropogenic activities such as irrigation and fertilization play a major role, while bare land nutrient patterns are more influenced by physical properties and topography. This divergence underscores the complex interplay between natural and human-induced factors in shaping soil nutrients variability. The integration of PCA with spatial interpolation techniques, like Ordinary Kriging (OK), provides a more nuanced mapping of nutrient distribution, particularly in forestland and grassland ecosystems, revealing strong associations with elevation gradients.
These findings emphasize the importance of land use-specific nutrient management strategies. For instance, precision agriculture techniques, such as variable-rate fertilization, can address nutrient imbalances in croplands, while forest management should prioritize topographic preservation to maintain nutrient availability. The role of capillary water capacity in grasslands offers new research directions for soil–water–plant interactions, highlighting the importance of integrated management practices. In bare lands, nutrient restoration efforts should focus on erosion control and soil structure improvement to promote ecosystem resilience. In summary, this study advances our understanding of soil nutrient dynamics by linking nutrient distribution to environmental variables across different land use types. The findings highlight the need for tailored land management strategies that optimize nutrient use efficiency and enhance soil fertility. This research provides a methodological framework combining PCA and geospatial analysis for future studies on soil–environment interactions, contributing to sustainable ecosystem management.
5. Conclusions
This study investigated the spatial distribution and variability of key soil nutrients (pH, Soil organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) in the red-bed regions of South China, revealing significant spatial heterogeneity influenced by topographic features, soil properties, and anthropogenic activities. The research achieved its objectives by characterizing soil nutrient properties, analyzing their spatial distribution across different land use types, and exploring the interactions between soil nutrients and environmental factors. The findings highlight the strong spatial autocorrelation of most nutrients, with soil organic matter, showing positive correlations with available potassium (r = 0.754) and phosphorus (r = 0.697 *), and available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium exhibiting synergistic effects (r = 0.767 ** and r = 0.834 **, respectively). The semivariogram analysis confirmed the high spatial variability of available potassium, influenced by human activities, while pH showed limited variability.
These findings provide a scientific basis for tailored soil management strategies, including precision fertilization, erosion control, and ecological restoration, customized for specific land use types. Integrating topographic and environmental data into land management planning is essential for optimizing nutrient use and mitigating soil degradation in fragile ecosystems. However, the study’s focus on a single red-bed region limits its generalizability to areas with differing climatic and geological conditions. Future research should expand the spatial and temporal scope of sampling and incorporate long-term monitoring to capture nutrient dynamics under changing environmental and land use scenarios. The application of advanced technologies, such as remote sensing and machine learning, alongside geostatistical methods, could enhance the scalability, precision, and applicability of future studies, supporting global efforts in sustainable ecosystem management.