Next Article in Journal
A T-Cell-Derived 3-Gene Signature Distinguishes SARS-CoV-2 from Common Respiratory Viruses
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Complexities of Long COVID
Previous Article in Journal
Chandipura Virus Forms Cytoplasmic Inclusion Bodies through Phase Separation and Proviral Association of Cellular Protein Kinase R and Stress Granule Protein TIA-1
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prognostic Value of D-dimer to Lymphocyte Ratio (DLR) in Hospitalized Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients: A Validation Study in a National Cohort
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 16
Issue 7
10.3390/v16071028
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Long COVID Clusters of Symptoms Persist beyond Two Years after Infection: Insights from the CARDIO COVID 20–21 Registry

by
Juan Pablo Arango-Ibanez
1,
Brayan Daniel Córdoba-Melo
1,
Juliana María Gutiérrez Posso
1,
Mario Miguel Barbosa-Rengifo
1,
Cesar J. Herrera
2,
Miguel Angel Quintana Da Silva
3,
Andrés Felipe Buitrago
4,
María Lorena Coronel Gilio
5,
Freddy Pow-Chong-Long
6 and
Juan Esteban Gómez-Mesa
1,7,8,*
1
Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas (CIC), Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali 760032, Colombia
2
Departamento de Cardiología, Centros de Diagnóstico y Medicina Avanzada y de Conferencias Médicas y Telemedicina (CEDIMAT), Santo Domingo F3QG+PJ6, Dominican Republic
3
Departamento de Cardiología, Instituto Cardiovascular Sanatorio MIGONE, Asunción 1541, Paraguay
4
Departamento de Cardiología, Fundación Santa Fe, Bogota 110111, Colombia
5
Departamento de Cardiología, Instituto de Cardiología J. F. Cabral, Corrientes 3400, Argentina
6
Departamento de Cardiología, Hospital Luis Vernaza, Guayaquil 090306, Ecuador
7
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Icesi, Cali 760031, Colombia
8
Departamento de Cardiología, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali 760032, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2024, 16(7), 1028; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16071028
Submission received: 13 June 2024 / Revised: 21 June 2024 / Accepted: 24 June 2024 / Published: 26 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue COVID-19: Prognosis and Long-Term Sequelae, 2nd Edition)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Long COVID presents with diverse symptoms after COVID-19. Different clusters of symptoms have been reported; however, their persistence beyond 2 years after COVID-19 remains unclear. In this cohort study, we prospectively evaluated individuals with previous severe COVID-19 presenting with long COVID at a two-year follow-up. We characterized the included patients and performed a cluster analysis of symptoms through multiple correspondence analysis and hierarchical clustering. A total of 199 patients with long COVID were included. The median age was 58 years (48–69), 56% were male, and the median follow-up time since the COVID-19 diagnosis was 26 months (IQR: 25, 27). Three symptom clusters were identified: Cluster 1 is characterized by fatigue, myalgia/arthralgia, a low prevalence of symptoms, and a lack of specific symptoms; Cluster 2 is defined by a high prevalence of fatigue, myalgia/arthralgia, and cardiorespiratory symptoms, including palpitations, shortness of breath, cough, and chest pain; and Cluster 3 is demonstrated a high prevalence of ageusia, anosmia, fatigue, and cardiorespiratory symptoms. Our study reinforces the concept of symptom clustering in long COVID, providing evidence that these clusters may persist beyond two years after a COVID-19 diagnosis. This highlights the chronic and debilitating nature of long COVID and the importance of developing strategies to mitigate symptoms in these patients.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), first appeared in 2019. By December 2023, approximately 772 million cases and nearly 7 million deaths had been reported worldwide [1]. The long-term consequences following infection are collectively referred to as ‘long COVID’, also named ‘post-COVID-19 condition/syndrome’, and have garnered widespread attention due to its high incidence and difficult recognition [2]. Different clinical definitions have also been proposed for long COVID [3]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), it is a condition that occurs in individuals with a history of probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 virus infection, three months after the onset of COVID-19, whose manifestations persist for at least two months, impact patients’ lives, and cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis [4]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines it as a spectrum of physical and psychological consequences in patients that occur four or more weeks after COVID-19 infection [5].
The signs and symptoms present in patients with long COVID are multisystemic and fluctuating, including fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, headache, post-traumatic stress, sleep disturbances, dyspnea, cough, myalgias, arthralgias, anosmia, dysgeusia, cardiac and gastrointestinal manifestations, among others [6,7]. This spectrum of manifestations is more commonly seen in patients with a history of severe COVID-19 and tends to occur in clusters, including neurological, cardiorespiratory, and systemic-inflammatory [8,9,10]. Furthermore, it includes not only multisystemic symptoms but also specific medical conditions like type 2 diabetes mellitus, encephalomyelitis, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, and cardiovascular diseases, among others. The pathophysiology of long COVID includes a combination of factors like persistent SARS-CoV-2 reservoirs, immune dysregulation, and autoimmunity, leading to widespread organ damage and inflammation. It involves significant vascular and endothelial dysfunction, contributing to thrombosis and altered blood flow. Many of these changes may persist for several months [9].
Latin America (LATAM) has been greatly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, representing around 15% of the cases globally and 28% of the deaths by 2022 [11]. Moreover, research has shown that people with Hispanic or Latino Heritage present a higher prevalence of long COVID [12]. Currently, a gap exists in the information about long COVID in LATAM [13]. This has been highlighted by a recent narrative review [14] and a study suggesting that the impact of long COVID is underreported in this region [15]. Therefore, we decided to conduct a study involving patients from the Latin American Registry of Cardiovascular Disease and COVID-19 (CARDIO COVID 19–20) [16]. This study aims to investigate the characteristics and clusters of symptoms in individuals experiencing long COVID, persisting beyond two years after a severe COVID-19 diagnosis. Understanding the temporal extent and clustering of long COVID symptoms is crucial for developing comprehensive patient care and management strategies. Moreover, identifying different clusters of symptoms aids in understanding the different pathophysiological mechanisms that have been studied and will pave the path for specific therapy for each phenotypic presentation [9,10].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

We conducted a prospective cohort study involving patients who had COVID-19. These patients were identified from the CARDIO COVID 19–20 registry [16], a multicenter database comprising 3260 patients hospitalized with microbiologically confirmed COVID-19 from 44 institutions across 14 countries. Institutions participating in CARDIO COVID 19–20 were invited to join a follow-up study named CARDIO COVID 20–21. This follow-up study aimed to assess long-term symptoms, biomarkers, radiological abnormalities, and psychiatric disturbances, among other objectives. Both registries were coordinated and supervised by the Inter-American Council of Heart Failure and Pulmonary Hypertension (CIFACAH) of the Inter-American Society of Cardiology (IASC).
  • Inclusion criteria;
    • Previous severe COVID-19 during hospitalization;
    • Patients meeting the CDCs criteria for long COVID;
    • Patients with symptoms either currently or within the last 3 months prior to the follow-up;
    • Patients who signed informed consent to participate.
  • Exclusion criteria included:
    • Patients without symptoms.

2.2. Definitions

  • Severe COVID-19 was defined as;
    • The need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or;
    • Myocardial injury (evidenced by elevated troponin levels), or;
    • High risk of venous thromboembolism (indicated by elevated D-dimer), or;
    • Other de novo cardiovascular complications observed during the hospital stay, including acute heart failure, stroke, and pulmonary embolism.
This definition was used for the Cardio COVID 19–20 registry and was designed before the development of official international severity classifications [16]. Long COVID was defined as the presence of symptoms lasting more than four weeks following a COVID-19 diagnosis and not explained by other conditions. This definition aligns with that provided by the CDC [5].

2.3. Data Collection

For the CARDIO COVID 20–21 registry, all institutions that participated in the CARDIO COVID 19–20 (44 institutions from 14 countries) were invited to participate in this long-term follow-up. Six institutions from 5 countries agreed to participate.
Patients were initially contacted by phone and invited to participate. If the patient agreed to participate, informed consent was signed, and an in-person or virtual clinical evaluation was then performed.
Data on demographics, comorbidities, and other variables (e.g., COVID-19 vaccination status) were assessed at the follow-up. Physicians involved in the study conducted physical examinations, which included measuring vital signs and evaluating for signs of heart failure. We used a standardized virtual questionnaire to assess self-reported symptoms meeting the criteria for long COVID in participants; trained physicians of the research group supervised this evaluation. In this questionnaire, participants were asked about the presence of persistent symptoms following COVID-19 hospitalization, specifically those that remained until at least the last three months during the follow-up assessment. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the persistent symptoms of long COVID beyond two years of COVID-19 diagnosis. Symptoms evaluated in the questionnaire included: fatigue, myalgia/arthralgia, anorexia, palpitations, chest pain, angina, orthostatism, shortness of breath, cough, dysphagia, diarrhea, dry mouth, ageusia, and anosmia. These symptoms were selected due to their high prevalence in long COVID [10] and were defined as highly relevant by the participating researchers because of their practice experience.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

A descriptive analysis was conducted using the median and interquartile range (IQR) to summarize continuous variables, while frequency and percentage are described as categorical variables. The assumption of normality was assessed using the Wilk-Shapiro test. For the cluster analysis, our methodology was adapted from a study investigating patient clusters in long COVID [7].
First, a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was employed to identify symptom groups, reduce complexity, and eliminate redundancies, in this case, 14 symptoms. This method transforms categorical data into coordinates within a multidimensional space, using the χ2 distance between coordinates to group similarly close individuals. Various dimensional solutions are obtained from this technique. The choice of the optimal solution is based on the fewest dimensions needed to explain the maximum total variability, resulting in a reduction in the number of variables required to summarize the data. In this study, MCA was applied to symptoms present in at least 10% of the subjects, and less frequent symptoms were grouped into single variables.
Secondly, the MCA coordinates were subjected to agglomerative hierarchical clustering (HC) using the Ward minimum-variance method. Initially, this method considers each participant as an individual cluster and then gradually merges clusters based on the shortest Euclidean distance between them. This merging continues until only one cluster remains, containing all participants. To determine the most suitable number of clusters, the sum of within-cluster inertia was calculated for each partition. The partition exhibiting a substantial relative reduction in inertia was chosen as the optimal clustering point. This procedure was performed using the ‘FactoMineR’ R Studio package [17].
Fisher’s exact test and Kruskal–Wallis Rank Sum test were used to compare variables across clusters. We considered statistical significance to be a p-value less than 0.05. The statistical analysis was performed using R software version 2023.12.0 + 369. Figures were created using R software version 2023.12.0 + 369, Microsoft Excel version 2311, and Lucidchart.

3. Results

The CARDIO COVID 19–20 registry included 3260 patients. 869 died during hospitalization, 417 had moderate COVID-19, 37 died at the 1-month follow-up and 318 were unreachable at this 1-month follow-up (Figure 1).
For the current registry, CARDIO COVID 20–21, six institutions from five countries (Argentina, Colombia, Ecuador, Dominican Republic, and Paraguay) accepted to participate in this 2-year follow-up (Figure 2). Of the 1619 patients initially eligible, 1105 were excluded due to various barriers faced by their institutions. These included restricted access to stored clinical files, insufficient staffing for the project, and the temporary closure of some facilities owing to the health crisis, among other factors. Of the 514 remaining patients, 242 were excluded as they could not be reached or declined participation. 272 accepted to participate. For this subanalysis, 73 patients were excluded due to the absence of symptoms consistent with long COVID, resulting in 199 patients for the final analysis (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Baseline clinical characteristics and comorbidities are shown in Table 1. The median age was 58 years (IQR: 48–69), and 111 (56%) were men. 114 (57%) patients were admitted to the ICU during acute COVID-19. The median time between COVID-19 diagnosis and follow-up was 26 months (IQR: 25, 27). The most frequent comorbidities included hypertension in 111 (56%) patients, overweight/obesity in 100 (51%) patients, and diabetes mellitus in 57 (29%) patients. 187 (94%) of patients reported a complete vaccination schedule for COVID-19 at the time of the follow-up, and this was considered complete when the patient had at least two doses of an mRNA vaccine (e.g., Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) or a single dose of a viral vector vaccine (e.g., Johnson & Johnson’s/Janssen). Patients included had no reinfection of COVID-19.
Table 2 shows the findings from the physical examinations. The median body mass index was 27.1 (IQR: 24.9, 30.1). Median vital signs were within normal range. Peripheral edema was observed in 22% of patients, and jugular regurgitation in 2.9%. Additionally, 15.5% of patients had a New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification scale of III or IV.
For the cluster analysis, four symptoms were combined: chest pain with angina and palpitations with orthostatism. These groups were subsequently labeled, respectively, as chest pain and palpitations. The five most frequent symptoms were fatigue (71%), myalgias/arthralgias (56%), shortness of breath (34%), palpitations (31%), and dry mouth (28%) (Table 3). Through MCA and HC performed on symptoms, three clusters were revealed (Figure 3).
In Cluster 1, there were 126 participants, and the predominant manifestations were fatigue (61%), myalgias/arthralgias (44%), and shortness of breath (24%). Patients in Cluster 1 had a lower prevalence of symptoms compared to patients in Clusters 2 and 3. Cluster 2 comprised 56 patients, and the most frequent symptoms included fatigue (91%), myalgias/arthralgias (84%), dry mouth (61%), palpitations (59%), cough (55%), and shortness of breath (55%). Cluster 3 included 17 patients, and the most frequent symptoms included ageusia (94%), anosmia (88%), fatigue (82%), palpitations (65%), and chest pain (65%).
We named Cluster 1 as “systemic-inflammatory”, Cluster 2 as “musculoskeletal-cardiorespiratory”, and Cluster 3 as “neurological-cardiorespiratory” according to the most representative symptoms present in each. There was an overall statistical significance for differences in all symptoms across clusters. The median number of symptoms was 2 (IQR: 1, 3) for Cluster 1, 5 (IQR: 4.75, 6.25) for Cluster 2, and 6 (IQR: 6, 9) for Cluster 3, showing a significant difference (p < 0.001).
Regarding patient characteristics by clusters, male sex showed a marked difference: only 3 (18%) patients in Cluster 3 were male, compared to 75 (60%) in Cluster 1 and 33 (59%) in Cluster 2 (p = 0.005). No other demographics or comorbidities displayed a statistically significant difference between clusters. However, in the case of findings at the physical exam (Table 2), a difference was seen in diastolic pressure, peripheral edema, and NYHA. The median diastolic pressure was 80 (IQR: 71, 84) in Cluster 1, 82 (IQR: 72, 87) in Cluster 2, and 70 (IQR: 60, 78) in Cluster 3 (p = 0.01). Peripheral edema was present in 10 (9.7%) patients from Cluster 1, 15 (28%) from Cluster 2, and 13 (75%) from Cluster 3 (p < 0.001). NYHA III or IV was present in 15 (12%) patients from Cluster 1, 9 (16%) from Cluster 2, and 6 (35%) from Cluster 3 (p < 0.03).
A subsequent analysis was performed to differentiate clusters 2 and 3, given the similar symptom profile (Table 4). A significant difference was detected in myalgia/arthralgia (p = 0.018), anorexia (p = 0.03), and especially in ageusia and anosmia (p < 0.001).

4. Discussion

This is a prospective, multicentric cohort study of Latin American patients with long COVID after an episode of severe COVID-19. We identified 199 patients with symptoms consistent with long COVID persisting for 2 years. Three clusters were observed through MCA and hierarchical clustering: Cluster 1 (systemic-inflammatory), Cluster 2 (musculoskeletal-cardiorespiratory), and Cluster 3 (neurological-cardiorespiratory). Evidence already exists for long COVID symptoms lasting over two years [18,19,20,21]; however, most studies evaluating clusters of symptoms have assessed them within a year or less [7,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. To our knowledge, this is the first study in the literature demonstrating the persistence of long COVID clusters of clinical manifestations beyond two years after COVID-19 diagnosis. Other studies have reported similar findings, for instance, Ito et al. described clusters at a follow-up of 12 months [30], and Zhao et al. at a follow-up of 20 months [35]. The prolonged duration of symptoms could be related to the severity of acute illness, comorbidities, and age, among other factors [30,36,37,38]. These results highlight the substantial morbidity of long COVID. They also aid in recognizing symptom clusters, promoting physician awareness, and developing long-term management plans for affected patients.
In our study, the predominant symptoms observed were fatigue, myalgia/arthralgia, dry mouth, palpitations, shortness of breath, and cough. Notably, these symptoms overlap significantly with the findings from a meta-analysis including 76 studies, in which the most common symptoms that corresponded with ours were fatigue (37.8%), dyspnea (23.4%), muscle pain (10.2%), and anosmia (11.2%) [10]. This highlights a similarity between some of the most frequent symptoms reported in the literature and ours.
The markedly high prevalence of symptoms observed in our study suggests an increased risk of developing a long COVID phenotype with a higher number of symptoms in patients who had severe COVID-19. This observation aligns with findings from previous research that noted a similar trend and highlighted the relevance of monitoring for long COVID in patients with a history of severe disease [8,39]. Despite our assessment specifically targeting symptoms emerging after acute illness, the increased symptom prevalence observed in our study may also derive from a cohort with higher comorbidity rates, possibly resulting in symptom overlap between long COVID and pre-existing comorbidities. Moreover, this is a very specific group of patients, as we included only those with symptoms persisting beyond two years, potentially excluding those who had resolved long COVID.
Our clustering presents similar findings to those from a meta-analysis, which reported on eight studies using cluster analysis, of which seven identified clusters of symptoms. This meta-analysis demonstrated the presence of three phenotypes: systemic-inflammatory, cardiorespiratory, and neurological [10]. Our Cluster 1 presents similar characteristics to the systemic-inflammatory cluster reported in the meta-analysis, which includes symptoms such as muscle pain, weakness, sleep disorders, and gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea in this case). In this cluster, specific symptoms are absent, and the prevalence of symptoms is low, findings that closely align with the results of the mentioned meta-analysis. Our results strongly resemble those found in the studies by Frontera et al. [40], Kenny et al. [7], and Mateu et al. [41], in which a cluster with a low prevalence of symptoms and a lack of specific symptoms was reported.
Our Cluster 2 aligns with the cardiorespiratory cluster identified in the meta-analysis, with both exhibiting a high prevalence of symptoms such as shortness of breath, chest pain, and palpitations [10]. A recent study of 341 long COVID patients revealed three distinct symptom clusters. The cluster with a moderate number of patients predominantly exhibited systemic and cardiorespiratory symptoms, resembling our Cluster 2 [41]. Ageusia, and anosmia, were highly specific to Cluster 3, aligning with the neurological cluster in the meta-analysis and highlighting long COVID impact on the nervous system [10]. Additionally, studies investigating long COVID symptoms have identified clusters with ageusia and anosmia correlations [24,30,31,32]. Interestingly, most patients in Cluster 3 were women (82%); this reinforces a meta-analysis finding that women are less likely to recover from taste and smell dysfunction [42].
Notably, our Cluster 3 presents a high prevalence of cardiorespiratory symptoms, a finding not observed in the meta-analysis by Kuodi et al. [10]. The distribution of symptoms in Cluster 2 (musculoskeletal-cardiorespiratory) and Cluster 3 (neurological-cardiorespiratory) appears remarkably similar. The only statistically significant differences were found in anosmia, dysgeusia, and anorexia. While findings vary significantly among studies, there is a notable consistency in reports of symptom clusters with similar types, numbers, and characteristics in long COVID cases.
The meta-analysis identifies the presence of overlapping symptoms across different clusters, something that also occurs in our study. In the present paper, this happened especially to fatigue and myalgia/arthralgia. While our clusters show symptom similarities with those in the reviewed meta-analysis, a full comparison is limited due to the exclusion of several symptoms in our study, such as headaches, sleep disorders, and hair loss (among many others). Additionally, notable differences were observed between our study and the meta-analysis. Although there are similarities between our Cluster 1 and the systemic-inflammatory cluster in the meta-analysis, the symptom profile appears different [10]. These findings emphasize the heterogeneity and complexity of long COVID, underlining the need for continued research to characterize its phenotypes more precisely.
Different pathophysiological mechanisms explain the multis-system effects and symptoms of long COVID. These include viral reservoirs, persistent inflammation, autoimmunity, endothelial dysfunction, and microbiome dysbiosis [9,43]. Additionally, persistent organ damage following COVID-19 has been observed in multiple organs, including the heart, lungs, liver, kidney, and brain [9,44]. These abnormalities may help explain the various clusters of symptoms reported in long COVID, which could result from different combinations of pathophysiological mechanisms and affected organs. Hence, systemic symptoms like fatigue and musculoskeletal pain may arise from systemic mechanisms, such as delayed viral clearance, chronic inflammation, hypoxia, and microvascular injury [43,45]. Cardiorespiratory symptoms may result from lasting damage to the lungs and heart, since pulmonary and cardiac injuries are key aspects of COVID-19; this damage is due to inflammation, blood clots, endothelial dysfunction, autoimmunity, and ongoing viral presence [43,46]. Finally, neurological damage from COVID-19, such as direct viral harm, extensive neuroinflammation, and endothelial damage, may contribute to the neurological symptoms of long COVID [43]. Smell and taste abnormalities are explained by local inflammation and long-term alterations in neurological structures [47,48]. Further studies should explore the specific pathophysiological pathways and organ damage linked to each symptom cluster and their interactions.
Most patients in this cohort were men, contrary to previous findings from a meta-analysis that show that women are at increased risk of long COVID [49]. This finding could be related to the increased risk of severe COVID-19 among men [50], which was one of the criteria for selecting patients for this study. We observed that most patient characteristics, such as age or comorbidities, were not significantly different across clusters. A difference was noted in male sex, diastolic pressure, peripheral edema, and NYHA III-IV. In contrast to our findings, a study found that female sex and being a healthcare worker were linked to two clusters. This study also found that age and ethnicity were not associated with clusters [7]. Another study also found no differences between clusters regarding demographic characteristics (age, sex, race) and comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) [40]. Other studies have found mixed significance for patient characteristics across clusters [30,35]. Further addressing the risk factors associated with clusters may enhance our understanding of long COVID phenotypes and their identification.

5. Strengths and Limitations

Notably, this is one of the few studies from a Latin American population to report clusters of symptoms. The inclusion of patients with a history of severe disease ensures a focused examination of this subgroup. Another strength is the prospective inclusion of patients from different institutions and different countries. Most patients were evaluated in-person, compared to many other studies in the literature that collected data through virtual surveys. Conducting an in-person evaluation may lead to a more accurate symptom evaluation, as the physician administering the questionnaire can provide explanations directly to the patient. Moreover, in-person evaluation allowed us to obtain data on vital signs and physical examination.
The generalization of findings could be limited by the varying definitions of COVID-19 severity and long COVID; by the time the CARDIO COVID 19–20 and CARDIO COVID 20–21 registries were designed, but the official World Health Organization classification for COVID-19 severity was not released. Moreover, many institutions did not participate in this follow-up registry, and many patients were lost to follow-up. One reason for this situation is that some hospitals were provisional hospitals established during the pandemic. By the time of this study, some of these hospitals were no longer operational, and others did not have access to medical files from the pandemic period.
The study does not include other long COVID symptoms reported in the literature, such as sleep disturbances or brain fog, among many others. There was no longitudinal follow-up of the symptoms. Potential recall bias of the self-reported symptoms and the absence of a detailed time for each symptom are also important caveats. Caution is needed when interpreting our findings because of the characteristics of our cohort: previous severe COVID-19 at a time when no vaccines were available, and the presence of long COVID symptoms lasting more than two years. This situation is particularly important, as vaccination is associated with a reduced risk of long COVID effects [51].
The combination of myalgia/arthralgia may hinder comparison with other studies and may overestimate the presence of each by itself. The overlapping of symptoms across clusters highlights the limitations of clustering techniques and the complexity of long COVID symptoms. Finally, the relatively small number of patients in cluster 3 and, to a lesser extent, in cluster 2, diminishes the power of the findings when comparing these groups.

6. Conclusions

Long COVID has emerged as a significant and persistent public health challenge, affecting a substantial portion of patients recovering from COVID-19. Our study reinforces the concept of symptom clustering in long COVID, contributing evidence to their persistence beyond two years after infection. We identified three distinct symptom clusters named according to the prevalence of their symptoms: Systemic-Inflammatory, Musculoskeletal-Cardiorespiratory, and Neurological-Cardiorespiratory. Recognizing and categorizing these clusters is crucial, as it may inform potential targeted treatment strategies and enhance our ability to manage the multifaceted nature of long COVID effectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.M.B.-R., C.J.H., M.A.Q.D.S., A.F.B., M.L.C.G., F.P.-C.-L. and J.E.G.-M.; Data curation, J.P.A.-I., B.D.C.-M. and J.M.G.P.; Formal analysis: M.M.B.-R.; Funding acquisition, J.E.G.-M.; Investigation: J.P.A.-I., B.D.C.-M., J.M.G.P., M.M.B.-R., C.J.H., M.A.Q.D.S., A.F.B., M.L.C.G., F.P.-C.-L. and J.E.G.-M.; Methodology, B.D.C.-M., M.M.B.-R. and J.E.G.-M.; Project administration: J.E.G.-M.; Supervision: J.P.A.-I., M.M.B.-R., C.J.H., M.A.Q.D.S., A.F.B., M.L.C.G., F.P.-C.-L. and J.E.G.-M.; Validation, J.E.G.-M.; Visualization: J.P.A.-I., J.M.G.P. and M.M.B.-R.; Writing—original draft: J.P.A.-I., B.D.C.-M., J.M.G.P., M.M.B.-R. and J.E.G.-M.; Writing—review and editing: J.P.A.-I., C.J.H., M.A.Q.D.S., A.F.B., M.L.C.G., F.P.-C.-L. and J.E.G.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received financial support from the Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas (CIC) and a research grant provided by Tecnoquimicas S.A. (number TQ-2021-1756) to the Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas. The findings and conclusions presented herein reflect the perspectives of the authors alone and should not be construed as an endorsement by or representative of the views of either Tecnoquimicas S.A. or Fundación Valle del Lili.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, Comité de Ética e Investigación Biomédicas, of Fundación Valle del Lili (protocol code 1756, approved on 21 April 2021). Informed consent for the collection of data were obtained from all participants. This study adheres to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was conducted in accordance with 008430/1993 from the Ministry of Health of Colombia and Colombian data protection law (Law 1581 of 2012).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available online: https://covid19.who.int (accessed on 10 November 2023).
  2. Oronsky, B.; Larson, C.; Hammond, T.C.; Oronsky, A.; Kesari, S.; Lybeck, M.; Reid, T.R. A Review of Persistent Post-COVID Syndrome (PPCS). Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2023, 64, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alwan, N.A.; Johnson, L. Defining Long COVID: Going Back to the Start. Med. N. Y. 2021, 2, 501–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Soriano, J.B.; Murthy, S.; Marshall, J.C.; Relan, P.; Diaz, J.V.; WHO Clinical Case Definition Working Group on Post-COVID-19 Condition. A Clinical Case Definition of Post-COVID-19 Condition by a Delphi Consensus. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, e102–e107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. CDC Healthcare Workers. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/clinical-care/post-covid-conditions.html (accessed on 20 December 2023).
  6. Pavli, A.; Theodoridou, M.; Maltezou, H.C. Post-COVID Syndrome: Incidence, Clinical Spectrum, and Challenges for Primary Healthcare Professionals. Arch. Med. Res. 2021, 52, 575–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kenny, G.; McCann, K.; O’Brien, C.; Savinelli, S.; Tinago, W.; Yousif, O.; Lambert, J.S.; O’Broin, C.; Feeney, E.R.; De Barra, E.; et al. Identification of Distinct Long COVID Clinical Phenotypes Through Cluster Analysis of Self-Reported Symptoms. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2022, 9, ofac060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shen, Q.; Joyce, E.E.; Ebrahimi, O.V.; Didriksen, M.; Lovik, A.; Sævarsdóttir, K.S.; Magnúsdóttir, I.; Mikkelsen, D.H.; Unnarsdóttir, A.B.; Hauksdóttir, A.; et al. COVID-19 Illness Severity and 2-Year Prevalence of Physical Symptoms: An Observational Study in Iceland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark. Lancet Reg. Health Eur. 2023, 35, 100756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Davis, H.E.; McCorkell, L.; Vogel, J.M.; Topol, E.J. Long COVID: Major Findings, Mechanisms and Recommendations. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kuodi, P.; Gorelik, Y.; Gausi, B.; Bernstine, T.; Edelstein, M. Characterization of Post-COVID Syndromes by Symptom Cluster and Time Period up to 12 Months Post-Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. IJID Off. Publ. Int. Soc. Infect. Dis. 2023, 134, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Schwalb, A.; Armyra, E.; Méndez-Aranda, M.; Ugarte-Gil, C. COVID-19 in Latin America and the Caribbean: Two Years of the Pandemic. J. Intern. Med. 2022, 292, 409–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Long COVID—Household Pulse Survey—COVID-19. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/covid19/pulse/long-covid.htm (accessed on 21 December 2023).
  13. Sakhamuri, S.M.; Jankie, S.; Pereira, L.M.P. Calling on Latin America and the Caribbean Countries to Recognise the Disability from Long COVID. Lancet Reg. Health—Am. 2022, 15, 100362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gallegos, M.; Martino, P.; Razumovskiy, A.; Portillo, N.; Calandra, M.; Caycho-Rodríguez, T.; Cervigni, M. Síndrome Post COVID-19 en América Latina y el Caribe: Un llamado de atención. Rev. Médica Rosario 2022, 88, 114–118. [Google Scholar]
  15. Alvarez-Moreno, C.A.; Pineda, J.; Bareño, A.; Espitia, R.; Rengifo, P. Long COVID-19 in Latin America: Low Prevalence, High Resilience or Low Surveillance and Difficulties Accessing Health Care? Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 51, 102492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gómez-Mesa, J.E.; Galindo-Coral, S.; Montes, M.C.; Alarco, W.; Barisani, J.L.; Magaña, A.; Perna, E.R.; Romero, A.; Speranza, M.; Mendoza, I.; et al. Latin-American Registry of Cardiovascular Disease and COVID-19: Rationale and Design of the CARDIO COVID 19-20 Registry. Glob. Heart 2021, 16, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Husson, F.; Josse, J.; Le, S.; Mazet, J. Package ‘FactoMineR’. 2020. Available online: https://cran.rediris.es/web/packages/FactoMineR/FactoMineR.pdf (accessed on 23 August 2021).
  18. Kim, Y.; Bae, S.; Chang, H.-H.; Kim, S.-W. Long COVID Prevalence and Impact on Quality of Life 2 Years after Acute COVID-19. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 11207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wahlgren, C.; Forsberg, G.; Divanoglou, A.; Östholm Balkhed, Å.; Niward, K.; Berg, S.; Levi, R. Two-Year Follow-up of Patients with Post-COVID-19 Condition in Sweden: A Prospective Cohort Study. Lancet Reg. Health Eur. 2023, 28, 100595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ballouz, T.; Menges, D.; Anagnostopoulos, A.; Domenghino, A.; Aschmann, H.E.; Frei, A.; Fehr, J.S.; Puhan, M.A. Recovery and Symptom Trajectories up to Two Years after SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Population Based, Longitudinal Cohort Study. BMJ 2023, 381, e074425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kim, Y.; Bae, S.; Chang, H.-H.; Kim, S.-W. Characteristics of Long COVID and the Impact of COVID-19 Vaccination on Long COVID 2 Years Following COVID-19 Infection: Prospective Cohort Study. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Peluso, M.J.; Kelly, J.D.; Lu, S.; Goldberg, S.A.; Davidson, M.C.; Mathur, S.; Durstenfeld, M.S.; Spinelli, M.A.; Hoh, R.; Tai, V.; et al. Persistence, Magnitude, and Patterns of Postacute Symptoms and Quality of Life Following Onset of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Cohort Description and Approaches for Measurement. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2021, 9, ofab640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sivan, M.; Parkin, A.; Makower, S.; Greenwood, D.C. Post-COVID Syndrome Symptoms, Functional Disability, and Clinical Severity Phenotypes in Hospitalized and Nonhospitalized Individuals: A Cross-sectional Evaluation from a Community COVID Rehabilitation Service. J. Med. Virol. 2022, 94, 1419–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Grisanti, S.G.; Garbarino, S.; Barisione, E.; Aloè, T.; Grosso, M.; Schenone, C.; Pardini, M.; Biassoni, E.; Zaottini, F.; Picasso, R.; et al. Neurological Long-COVID in the Outpatient Clinic: Two Subtypes, Two Courses. J. Neurol. Sci. 2022, 439, 120315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ziauddeen, N.; Gurdasani, D.; O’Hara, M.E.; Hastie, C.; Roderick, P.; Yao, G.; Alwan, N.A. Characteristics and Impact of Long Covid: Findings from an Online Survey. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0264331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Larson, J.L.; Zhou, W.; Veliz, P.T.; Smith, S. Symptom Clusters in Adults with Post-COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Clin. Nurs. Res. 2023, 32, 1071–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kisiel, M.A.; Lee, S.; Malmquist, S.; Rykatkin, O.; Holgert, S.; Janols, H.; Janson, C.; Zhou, X. Clustering Analysis Identified Three Long COVID Phenotypes and Their Association with General Health Status and Working Ability. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tsuchida, T.; Yoshimura, N.; Ishizuka, K.; Katayama, K.; Inoue, Y.; Hirose, M.; Nakagama, Y.; Kido, Y.; Sugimori, H.; Matsuda, T.; et al. Five Cluster Classifications of Long COVID and Their Background Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study in Japan. Clin. Exp. Med. 2023, 23, 3663–3670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, C.; Martín-Guerrero, J.D.; Florencio, L.L.; Navarro-Pardo, E.; Rodríguez-Jiménez, J.; Torres-Macho, J.; Pellicer-Valero, O.J. Clustering Analysis Reveals Different Profiles Associating Long-Term Post-COVID Symptoms, COVID-19 Symptoms at Hospital Admission and Previous Medical Co-Morbidities in Previously Hospitalized COVID-19 Survivors. Infection 2023, 51, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ito, F.; Terai, H.; Kondo, M.; Takemura, R.; Namkoong, H.; Asakura, T.; Chubachi, S.; Masuzawa, K.; Nakayama, S.; Suzuki, Y.; et al. Cluster Analysis of Long COVID in Japan and Association of Its Trajectory of Symptoms and Quality of Life. BMJ Open Respir. Res. 2024, 11, e002111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Torrell, G.; Puente, D.; Jacques-Aviñó, C.; Carrasco-Ribelles, L.A.; Violán, C.; López-Jiménez, T.; Royano, V.; Cantón, A.M.; Medina-Perucha, L.; Rodríguez-Giralt, I.; et al. Characterisation, Symptom Pattern and Symptom Clusters from a Retrospective Cohort of Long COVID Patients in Primary Care in Catalonia. BMC Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Van den Houdt, S.C.M.; Slurink, I.A.L.; Mertens, G. Long COVID Is Not a Uniform Syndrome: Evidence from Person-Level Symptom Clusters Using Latent Class Analysis. J. Infect. Public Health 2024, 17, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cornelissen, M.E.B.; Bloemsma, L.D.; Vaes, A.W.; Baalbaki, N.; Deng, Q.; Beijers, R.J.H.C.G.; Noij, L.C.E.; Houweling, L.; Bazdar, S.; Spruit, M.A.; et al. Fatigue and Symptom-Based Clusters in Post COVID-19 Patients: A Multicentre, Prospective, Observational Cohort Study. J. Transl. Med. 2024, 22, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Niewolik, J.; Mikuteit, M.; Klawitter, S.; Schröder, D.; Stölting, A.; Vahldiek, K.; Heinemann, S.; Müller, F.; Behrens, G.; Klawonn, F.; et al. Cluster Analysis of Long COVID Symptoms for Deciphering a Syndrome and Its Long-Term Consequence. Immunol. Res. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhao, Y.; Shi, L.; Jiang, Z.; Zeng, N.; Mei, H.; Lu, Y.; Yang, J.; Jin, F.; Ni, S.; Wu, S.; et al. The Phenotype and Prediction of Long-Term Physical, Mental and Cognitive COVID-19 Sequelae 20 Months after Recovery, a Community-Based Cohort Study in China. Mol. Psychiatry 2023, 28, 1793–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Boscolo-Rizzo, P.; Guida, F.; Polesel, J.; Marcuzzo, A.V.; Capriotti, V.; D’Alessandro, A.; Zanelli, E.; Marzolino, R.; Lazzarin, C.; Antonucci, P.; et al. Sequelae in Adults at 12 Months after Mild-to-Moderate Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2021, 11, 1685–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sudre, C.H.; Murray, B.; Varsavsky, T.; Graham, M.S.; Penfold, R.S.; Bowyer, R.C.; Pujol, J.C.; Klaser, K.; Antonelli, M.; Canas, L.S.; et al. Attributes and Predictors of Long COVID. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 626–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Thompson, E.J.; Williams, D.M.; Walker, A.J.; Mitchell, R.E.; Niedzwiedz, C.L.; Yang, T.C.; Huggins, C.F.; Kwong, A.S.F.; Silverwood, R.J.; Di Gessa, G.; et al. Long COVID Burden and Risk Factors in 10 UK Longitudinal Studies and Electronic Health Records. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tran, B.; Le Vu, M.N.; Le, H.T.; Nguyen, T.H.; Boyer, L.; Fond, G.; Auquier, P.; Latkin, C.A.; Ho, R.C.M.; Ho, C.S.H.; et al. Severity and Geographical Disparities of Post-COVID-19 Symptoms among the Vietnamese General Population: A National Evaluation. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 4460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Frontera, J.A.; Thorpe, L.E.; Simon, N.M.; de Havenon, A.; Yaghi, S.; Sabadia, S.B.; Yang, D.; Lewis, A.; Melmed, K.; Balcer, L.J.; et al. Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 Symptom Phenotypes and Therapeutic Strategies: A Prospective, Observational Study. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0275274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Mateu, L.; Tebe, C.; Loste, C.; Santos, J.R.; Lladós, G.; López, C.; España-Cueto, S.; Toledo, R.; Font, M.; Chamorro, A.; et al. Determinants of the Onset and Prognosis of the Post-COVID-19 Condition: A 2-Year Prospective Observational Cohort Study. Lancet Reg. Health—Eur. 2023, 33, 100724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tan, B.K.J.; Han, R.; Zhao, J.J.; Tan, N.K.W.; Quah, E.S.H.; Tan, C.J.-W.; Chan, Y.H.; Teo, N.W.Y.; Charn, T.C.; See, A.; et al. Prognosis and Persistence of Smell and Taste Dysfunction in Patients with Covid-19: Meta-Analysis with Parametric Cure Modelling of Recovery Curves. BMJ 2022, 378, e069503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Li, J.; Zhou, Y.; Ma, J.; Zhang, Q.; Shao, J.; Liang, S.; Yu, Y.; Li, W.; Wang, C. The Long-Term Health Outcomes, Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Multidisciplinary Management of Long COVID. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Greer, N.; Bart, B.; Billington, C.J.; Diem, S.J.; Ensrud, K.E.; Kaka, A.; Klein, M.; Melzer, A.C.; Reule, S.; Shaukat, A.; et al. COVID-19 Postacute Care Major Organ Damage: A Systematic Review. BMJ Open 2022, 12, e061245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Antar, A.A.R.; Yu, T.; Demko, Z.O.; Hu, C.; Tornheim, J.A.; Blair, P.W.; Thomas, D.L.; Manabe, Y.C. Long COVID Brain Fog and Muscle Pain Are Associated with Longer Time to Clearance of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from the Upper Respiratory Tract during Acute Infection. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1147549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gyöngyösi, M.; Alcaide, P.; Asselbergs, F.W.; Brundel, B.J.J.M.; Camici, G.G.; Martins, P.d.C.; Ferdinandy, P.; Fontana, M.; Girao, H.; Gnecchi, M.; et al. Long COVID and the Cardiovascular System—Elucidating Causes and Cellular Mechanisms in Order to Develop Targeted Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies: A Joint Scientific Statement of the ESC Working Groups on Cellular Biology of the Heart and Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Cardiovasc. Res. 2022, 119, 336–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mastrangelo, A.; Bonato, M.; Cinque, P. Smell and Taste Disorders in COVID-19: From Pathogenesis to Clinical Features and Outcomes. Neurosci. Lett. 2021, 748, 135694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Doty, R.L. Olfactory Dysfunction in COVID-19: Pathology and Long-Term Implications for Brain Health. Trends Mol. Med. 2022, 28, 781–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Tsampasian, V.; Elghazaly, H.; Chattopadhyay, R.; Debski, M.; Naing, T.K.P.; Garg, P.; Clark, A.; Ntatsaki, E.; Vassiliou, V.S. Risk Factors Associated with Post-COVID-19 Condition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Intern. Med. 2023, 183, 566–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Booth, A.; Reed, A.B.; Ponzo, S.; Yassaee, A.; Aral, M.; Plans, D.; Labrique, A.; Mohan, D. Population Risk Factors for Severe Disease and Mortality in COVID-19: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Byambasuren, O.; Stehlik, P.; Clark, J.; Alcorn, K.; Glasziou, P. Effect of Covid-19 Vaccination on Long Covid: Systematic Review. BMJ Med. 2023, 2, e000385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Viruses 16 01028 g001
Figure 1. Flowchart of patient selection for CARDIO COVID 20–21 cluster analysis. Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit.
Figure 1. Flowchart of patient selection for CARDIO COVID 20–21 cluster analysis. Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit.
Viruses 16 01028 g001
Viruses 16 01028 g002
Figure 2. Patient recruitment by country and distribution by sex.
Figure 2. Patient recruitment by country and distribution by sex.
Viruses 16 01028 g002
Viruses 16 01028 g003
Figure 3. Dendrogram and heatmap of clusters of symptoms. (A): Heatmap showing the presence or absence of various symptoms in patients with long COVID, grouped into three distinct clusters (1, 2, and 3). Each row represents an individual patient, and each column represents a specific symptom. The presence of a symptom is indicated in red (Yes), while the absence is indicated in blue (No). (B): Dendrogram illustrating the hierarchical clustering of patients with long COVID based on their symptom profiles. The dendrogram shows three clusters: Cluster 1, Cluster 2, and Cluster 3.
Figure 3. Dendrogram and heatmap of clusters of symptoms. (A): Heatmap showing the presence or absence of various symptoms in patients with long COVID, grouped into three distinct clusters (1, 2, and 3). Each row represents an individual patient, and each column represents a specific symptom. The presence of a symptom is indicated in red (Yes), while the absence is indicated in blue (No). (B): Dendrogram illustrating the hierarchical clustering of patients with long COVID based on their symptom profiles. The dendrogram shows three clusters: Cluster 1, Cluster 2, and Cluster 3.
Viruses 16 01028 g003
Table 1. Demographics and comorbidities by cluster.
Table 1. Demographics and comorbidities by cluster.
CharacteristicOverallCluster 1, n = 126Cluster 2, n = 56Cluster 3, n = 17p-Value
Age (years)58 (48, 69)60 (47, 70)56 (48, 64)57 (53, 65)0.6
Male111 (56%)75 (60%)33 (59%)3 (18%)0.005
Full vaccine series187 (94%)116 (92%)54 (96%)17 (100%)0.4
Admitted to the ICU114 (57%)71 (56%)32 (57%)11 (65%)0.8
Outpatient follow-up after admission157 (79%)102 (81%)41 (73%)14 (82%)0.5
Arterial hypertension111 (56%)68 (54%)33 (59%)10 (59%)0.8
Overweight/Obesity100 (51%)65 (52%)30 (55%)5 (31%)0.3
Diabetes mellitus57 (29%)29 (23%)21 (38%)7 (41%)0.061
Dyslipidemia23 (12%)19 (15%)4 (7.1%)0 (0%)0.10
Chronic kidney disease26 (13%)13 (10%)9 (16%)4 (26%)0.089
Coronary artery disease18 (9%)14 (11%)3 (5%)1 (6%)>0.9
Cancer (previous or active)14 (7%)7 (6%)6 (11%)1 (6%)0.6
Asthma14 (7%)9 (7.1%)3 (5.4%)2 (12%)0.5
Atrial fibrillation13 (6.5%)9 (7.1%)3 (5.4%)1 (5.9%)>0.9
Heart failure11 (5.5%)7 (5.6%)3 (5.4%)1 (5.9%)>0.9
Data are displayed as a number (%) or median (interquartile range). p-values were calculated using Fisher’s exact test, and Kruskal–Wallis Sum Rank test. Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit.
Table 2. Physical exam and clinical signs by cluster.
Table 2. Physical exam and clinical signs by cluster.
VariableNumber for AnalysisTotal
N = 199		Cluster 1, n = 126Cluster 2, n = 56Cluster 3, n = 17p-Value
Body mass index (kg/m2)18627.1 (24.6, 30.5)27.1 (24.9, 30.1)28.2 (24.5, 32)26 (25.2, 27.9)0.7
Heart rate (pulse rate)18672 (66, 80)72 (67, 80)72 (67, 80)68 (64, 72)0.3
Systolic pressure (mmHg)186127 (115, 139)128 (117, 139)127 (115, 139)116 (107, 148)0.4
Diastolic pressure (mmHg)18680 (70, 85)80 (71, 84)82 (72, 87)70 (60, 78)0.01
Respiratory rate (bpm)18618 (17, 18)18 (17, 18)17 (17, 18)17 (17, 18)0.3
Oxygen saturation (%)18597 (96, 98)96 (96, 98)97 (95.5, 97)97 (96, 97)>0.9
Peripheral edema17438 (22%)10 (9.7%)15 (28%)13 (76%)<0.001
Jugular regurgitation1755 (2.9%)4 (3.8%)1 (1.9%)0 (0%)0.8
NYHA III-IV19930 (15.5%)15 (12%) 9 (16%)6 (35%)0.03
Data are displayed as mean and standard deviation, median (interquartile range), or number (%). p-values were calculated using Fisher’s Exact Test and Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test. Abbreviations: NYHA, New York Heart Association Functional classification; bpm, breaths per minute. As some interviews were conducted virtually, the number for analysis is discordant with the total number of patients for some variables.
Table 3. Distribution of symptoms by Cluster.
Table 3. Distribution of symptoms by Cluster.
SymptomTotal
N = 199		Cluster 1, n = 126Cluster 2, n = 56Cluster 3, n = 17p-Value
Fatigue142 (71%)77 (61%)51 (91%)14 (82%)<0.001
Myalgia/arthralgia112 (56%)56 (44%)47 (84%)9 (53%)<0.001
Anorexia31 (16%)8 (6.3%)14 (25%)9 (53%)<0.001
Palpitations61 (31%)17 (13%)33 (59%)11 (65%)<0.001
Chest pain59 (30%)18 (14%)30 (54%)11 (65%)<0.001
Shortness of breath68 (34%)30 (24%)31 (55%)7 (41%)0.002
Cough54 (27%)16 (13%)31 (55%)7 (41%)<0.001
Dysphagia34 (17%)6 (4.8%)24 (43%)4 (24%)<0.001
Diarrhea26 (13%)2 (1.6%)17 (30%)7 (41%)<0.001
Dry mouth56 (28%)13 (10%)34 (61%)9 (53%)<0.001
Ageusia18 (9.0%)1 (0.8%)1 (1.8%)16 (94%)<0.001
Anosmia26 (13%)6 (4.8%)5 (8.9%)15 (88%)<0.001
Data are displayed as a number (%). p-value was calculated with Fisher’s Exact Test for Count Data with simulated p-value (based on 2000 replicates); Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test.
Table 4. Differences in symptom distribution between Cluster 2 and 3.
Table 4. Differences in symptom distribution between Cluster 2 and 3.
SymptomCluster 2, n = 56Cluster 3, n = 17p-Value
Fatigue51 (91%)14 (82%)0.4
Myalgia/Arthralgia47 (84%)9 (53%)0.018
Anorexia14 (25%)9 (53%)0.03
Palpitations33 (59%)11 (65%)0.7
Chest Pain30 (54%)11 (65%)0.4
Shortness of breath31 (55%)7 (41%)0.3
Cough31 (55%)7 (41%)0.3
Dysphagia24 (43%)4 (24%)0.2
Diarrhea17 (30%)7 (41%)0.4
Dry mouth34 (61%)9 (53%)0.6
Ageusia1 (1.8%)16 (94%)<0.001
Anosmia5 (8.9%)15 (88%)<0.001
Data are displayed as a number (%). p-value was calculated with Fisher’s Exact Test for Count Data with simulated p-value (based on 2000 replicates).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arango-Ibanez, J.P.; Córdoba-Melo, B.D.; Gutiérrez Posso, J.M.; Barbosa-Rengifo, M.M.; Herrera, C.J.; Quintana Da Silva, M.A.; Buitrago, A.F.; Coronel Gilio, M.L.; Pow-Chong-Long, F.; Gómez-Mesa, J.E. Long COVID Clusters of Symptoms Persist beyond Two Years after Infection: Insights from the CARDIO COVID 20–21 Registry. Viruses 2024, 16, 1028. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16071028

AMA Style

Arango-Ibanez JP, Córdoba-Melo BD, Gutiérrez Posso JM, Barbosa-Rengifo MM, Herrera CJ, Quintana Da Silva MA, Buitrago AF, Coronel Gilio ML, Pow-Chong-Long F, Gómez-Mesa JE. Long COVID Clusters of Symptoms Persist beyond Two Years after Infection: Insights from the CARDIO COVID 20–21 Registry. Viruses. 2024; 16(7):1028. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16071028

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arango-Ibanez, Juan Pablo, Brayan Daniel Córdoba-Melo, Juliana María Gutiérrez Posso, Mario Miguel Barbosa-Rengifo, Cesar J. Herrera, Miguel Angel Quintana Da Silva, Andrés Felipe Buitrago, María Lorena Coronel Gilio, Freddy Pow-Chong-Long, and Juan Esteban Gómez-Mesa. 2024. "Long COVID Clusters of Symptoms Persist beyond Two Years after Infection: Insights from the CARDIO COVID 20–21 Registry" Viruses 16, no. 7: 1028. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16071028

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop