Next Article in Journal
Formulations Based on Drug Loaded Aptamer-Conjugated Liposomes as a Viable Strategy for the Topical Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma—In Vitro Tests
Previous Article in Journal
Continuous Melt Granulation for Taste-Masking of Ibuprofen
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Subcutaneously Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel for Sustained Release of Donepezil with Reduced Initial Burst Release: Effect of Hybridization of Microstructured Lipid Carriers and Albumin

Pharmaceutics 2021, 13(6), 864; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13060864
by Nae-Won Kang 1,†, So-Yeon Yoon 1,†, Sungho Kim 1, Na-Young Yu 1, Ju-Hwan Park 1,2, Jae-Young Lee 3, Hyun-Jong Cho 4 and Dae-Duk Kim 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Pharmaceutics 2021, 13(6), 864; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13060864
Submission received: 24 May 2021 / Revised: 8 June 2021 / Accepted: 8 June 2021 / Published: 11 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Drug Delivery and Controlled Release)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

General comment:

Dear authors, the manuscript titled “Subcutaneously Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel for Sustained Release of Donepezil with Reduced Initial Burst 3 Release: Effect of Hybridization of Microstructured Lipid Carriers and Albumin” is quite interesting and the in vivo results are promising. The manuscript highlights the potential of microcarriers and hyaluronic acid hydrogels for sustained subcutaneous delivery of Donepezil.  

Comment 1: A native proofreader should revise the manuscript; some typos and grammatical mistakes must be corrected!

Comment 2: Have the authors evaluated the stability of the developed system?

Comment 3: Fig.2 presents the DSC, XRPD and FTIR spectra of the optimized MLCs, drug, lipid, physical mixture. There are actually no differences between the blank and loaded MLCs, then is that reliable to provide proof of the drug encapsulation within the MLCs?


Comment 4: In the discussion, the authors should compare the pharmacokinetics results with the previous literature on Donepezil S.C. delivery to further highlight the novelty of this work.


Comment 5: The sustained release delivery system holds high potential, especially in chronic treatment. But is it really more patient-friendly to administer the drug parentally compared to the oral route? The oral route is known to enhance the patient's adherence to the treatment, so how would the authors justify their selection of sc delivery system.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript represents a good attempt to sustain the release of an Alzheimer's drug through subcutaneous injection of hydrogels. The manuscript is very well designed and written and I recommend its publication after carrying these minor changes:

1- In the introduction: Different other attempts of delivering and sustaining the drugs release through different routes for ALzheimer treatment should be briefly mentioned. The authors can refer to :

Nat Prod Res. 2018 Dec;32(24):2873-2881. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2017.1385017. 

 

2- In figure 2: Graph (a) is not a histogram. Please correct.

3- In figure 6: The insert is not conforming with the main graph. Please correct or comment.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript by Kang et al. describes a novel study investigating the potential of a hyaluronic acid hydrogel hybridized with microstructured lipid carriers and human serum albumin for the sustained release of donepezil in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

I believe that both the experiment and the presentation of results are well-designed and -written.

I have a single concern regarding the novelty of the manuscript reflected in the selected references. In this context, I suggest adding more references published in the last 2 years. Some examples include:

  • 10.3390/biomedicines8100421
  • https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC111.84248430
  • https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13020170
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12051138

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop