Next Article in Journal
Honeybee Venom Synergistically Enhances the Cytotoxic Effect of CNS Drugs in HT-29 Colon and MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cell Lines
Next Article in Special Issue
Glioblastoma Multiforme Selective Nanomedicines for Improved Anti-Cancer Treatments
Previous Article in Journal
A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Study of Gemcitabine and Capecitabine with or without T-ChOS as Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Cancer (CHIPAC)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Progress and Viewpoints of Multifunctional Composite Nanomaterials for Glioblastoma Theranostics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceutics
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/pharmaceutics14030508
pharmaceutics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Iodine Nanoparticles (Niodx™) for Radiotherapy Enhancement of Glioblastoma and Other Cancers: An NCI Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory Study

by
James F. Hainfeld
1,*,
Sharif M. Ridwan
2,
Yaroslav Stanishevskiy
1 and
Henry M. Smilowitz
2
1
Nanoprobes, Inc., Yaphank, NY 11980, USA
2
Department of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2022, 14(3), 508; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14030508
Submission received: 29 December 2021 / Revised: 8 February 2022 / Accepted: 10 February 2022 / Published: 25 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacotherapy of Glioblastoma – Recent Improvements and Novel Perspectives)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Effective and durable treatment of glioblastoma is an urgent unmet medical need. In this article, we summarize a novel approach of a physical method that enhances the effectiveness of radiotherapy. High atomic number nanoparticles that target brain tumors are intravenously administered. Upon irradiation, the nanoparticles absorb X-rays creating free radicals, increasing the tumor dose several fold. Radiotherapy of mice with orthotopic human gliomas and human triple negative breast cancers growing in the brain showed significant life extensions when the nanoparticles were included. An extensive study of the properties of the iodine-containing nanoparticle (Niodx) by the Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory, including sterility, physicochemical characterization, in vitro cytotoxicity, in vivo immunological characterization, and in vivo toxicology, is presented. In summary, the iodine nanoparticle Niodx appears safe and effective for translational studies toward human use.

1. Introduction

1.1. Mechanism

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a brain cancer with a poor prognosis. The standard of care is surgical resection followed by radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy, but the five-year survival is only 5.6% [1] due to its location in the brain, rapid onset, high recurrence rate and resistance to currently available therapies [2]. New effective treatment methods are desperately needed.
One such new method that appears very promising is the loading of high atomic number (high-Z) atoms that highly absorb X-rays to the tumors followed by RT [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The absorbed X-rays eject inner shell electrons (the photoelectric effect) which then create tissue-damaging free radicals (Figure 1).
This in effect increases the local radiation dose (Figure 2), potentially overcoming the main limitation of standard radiotherapy (RT): to deliver a high enough dose to the tumor without overly damaging normal tissue.
This local radiation dose enhancement of high-Z X-ray-absorbing atoms has been known for many years [12]. Extensive work using standard iodine X-ray contrast media was pioneered by Norman and coworkers who showed significant tumor regressions in test animals [13]. A phase 1 trial using a modified CT scanner with brain tumor patients and IV injected iodine contrast media showed the method to be safe and promising [14]. More recently, a synchrotron was used to irradiate glioma patients also after IV injected iodine contrast media [15]. The irradiation was timed to maximize the iodine in the tumor, which averaged 0.19% iodine by weight (average of 12 patients [16]). This concentration was expected to yield a dose enhancement of 17%. This benefit is largely limited due to the use of standard iodine contrast media which clears the system very rapidly through the kidneys, thereby reducing tumor uptake. For example, iohexol (Figure 3) has a blood half-life of 45 s, followed by a slower phase half-life of ~13 min [17]. At maximal tumor uptake times, the vascular level in the normal brain parenchyma was ~0.5% which could also cause non-tumor effects. The pharmacokinetics of standard iodine contrast media then poses restrictions in its ability to deliver high levels of iodine to tumors while clearing normal tissue.
For effectiveness and specificity, the goal is to have high tumor uptake, which takes many passes, and also good non-tumor clearance.

1.2. Gold Nanoparticle Imaging and Radiotherapy

To overcome this delivery and clearance problem, we developed high-Z gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with longer blood half-lives that have more time to infiltrate tumors and clear normal tissues. In the first mouse trial using a subcutaneous mammary tumor, intravenous AuNPs followed by X-ray irradiation resulted in up to 86% long-term survival, with no tumors histologically detected after 1 year (Figure 4 [18]).
Tumor to non-tumor ratios were ~8:1, with tumor concentrations of 7 mg Au/g body weight. Nanoparticles were 1.9 nm in size, and irradiation was 26 Gy with a 250 kVp clinical X-ray therapy machine.
To achieve an even longer blood half-life to obtain better tumor to non-tumor effects, 11 nm AuNPs were constructed with a PEG coating (AuroVistTM), having a blood half-life of 24 h, and used to treat a challenging orthotopic highly malignant advanced glioma, (Tu2449), syngeneic for B6C3F1 mice. Fifteen hours after IV injection of 4 g Au/kg, the tumor-to-normal brain ratio was 18.8:1, and tumor concentration was 1.5% w/w gold. This level of uptake and normal brain tissue clearance produced clear X-ray images of the tumors with low non-tumor levels (Figure 5).
Perhaps one of the most exciting aspects of tumor painting with high-Z nanoparticles is their use to enhance radiotherapy (RT). RT is used in about 70% of all cancer treatments [19]. Tumor brain regions with AuNPs were irradiated with a single 30 Gy 100kVp dose. Results are shown in Figure 6 [20].

1.3. Iodine Nanoparticles

Although gold nanoparticles worked quite well for this application, they are intensely dark and cause long-term skin discoloration (Figure 7 [21]).
Hyperpigmentation after parenteral gold therapy was first described in 1928 and termed chrysiasis, when gold therapy was widely used for several common conditions such as tuberculosis. The discoloration was found to occur even after only 1 g of gold administration [22]. Skin pigmentation is also seen with silver and silver nanoparticles, called argyria [23]. To overcome this drawback, an iodine nanoparticle (INP, “Niodx”, a Nano-iodine-X-ray absorber) was developed by Nanoprobes, Inc. (Yaphank, NY, USA) which is colorless and shows no skin discoloration (Figure 7 [21]). With a size of 20 nm, it does not clear via the kidneys (which filter molecules less than about 5 nm). An electron micrograph, dynamic light scattering, and diagram of its structure are shown in Figure 8. The mean hydrodynamic diameter was found to be 19.6 nm with a polydispersity of 0.188 (19.8 ± 8.6 nm).
Chemically, Niodx is prepared by crosslinking iohexol and covalently attaching polyethylene glycol (PEG) to the outer surface (Figure 9). Further structural and synthetic details are described in reference [21], and extensive physicochemical characterization is reported in the Supplementary Information.
Niodx is well-tolerated at 7 g iodine/kg in mice, the highest tested. This level is somewhat surprising, as a clinically used iodine contrast agent, diatrizoate, has an LD50 of 7.5 g iodine/kg, producing acute death in 50% of mice at that dose [24].

1.4. Iodine Nanoparticle Imaging

Cancers stimulate new blood vessel formation to support growth, and this leaky endothelium can accumulate NPs. An example of a glioma imaged with Niodx is shown in Figure 10.
The tumor to non-tumor ratio was measured to be ~20:1. It was also found that excellent tumor imaging remained after 3 days (Figure 10c), and likely longer (not tested). Such high resolution tumor painting could be used to accurately align and develop an optimal IMRT (intensity modulated radiotherapy) treatment plan. As the tumor painting is stable over days, additional contrast agent injections would not be needed for every RT fraction, especially for hypofractionated regimens.
It should be noted that the favorable tumor to non-tumor loading with Niodx in these glioma studies (human U87 in mice) was achieved without active targeting, presumably due to the Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect [25]. Tumor blood vessels are, in many cases, more leaky towards nanoparticles. Some brain tumors have an intact, tight blood–brain barrier (BBB) blocking nanoparticle entry, but most GBM tumors in humans have an altered or disrupted BBB [26].

1.5. Iodine Nanoparticle Glioma Therapy

Niodx was then tested for efficacy when treating human U87 gliomas implanted in the brains of athymic immunocompromised mice lacking the adaptive immune system. Once again, the NPs themselves, without irradiation, had no effect on survival (Figure 11, inset). However, when combined with RT, they were found to provide more than double median survival (Figure 11 [27]).
Histological examination of experimental orthotopic gliomas showed that Niodx targeting after IV injection was quite specific (Figure 12). Niodx was found localized to both the tumor and the surrounding edematous region.

1.6. Iodine Nanoparticle Radiotherapy Synergy with Drugs

Upon irradiation, the high concentration of Niodx in and around tumor endothelium would be expected to selectively damage the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and blood–tumor barrier (BTB) in the tumor region. We hypothesized this could break down one of the barriers to drugs that generally are not effective against brain tumors as they do not penetrate well into the tumors. To test this, intravenous Doxil (liposomal doxorubicin) was administered to mice after RT performed in the presence and absence of INPs (Niodx). Results are shown in Figure 13.
These results showed RT+Niodx and Doxil were synergistic with one another and potentially confirmed that the breakdown of the BBB/endothelial barrier greatly enhanced drug delivery and increased efficacy. This may provide a way to enhance the effectiveness of chemotherapy, not only for brain tumors, but other cancers as well. Another independent study imaged better liposomal penetration and Doxil treatment after irradiation of subcutaneous tumors in the presence of AuNPs [28].

1.7. Iodine Nanoparticle Targeting

Next steps in improving tumor delivery, tumor cell uptake, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clearance may include: (a) active targeting and (b) fine tuning the nanoparticle properties (size, coating, and use of degradable bonds). A commonly used nanoparticle targeting method relies on the Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect. Angiogenic endothelium of growing tumors is leaky to 5–200 nm particles which then exit the blood compartment and are retained in the tumor. For more active targeting and cell uptake, adding a receptor ligand or cell penetrating peptide are common approaches. The chemical structure of Niodx supports its linking to amino groups and covalent binding to proteins, peptides, or other molecules. In preliminary tests, we attached transferrin, chosen because it enables nanoparticle penetration across the BBB/BTB and enhances uptake into tumor cells due to their upregulated TfR (transferrin receptors) [29,30,31]. “In vivo study suggested only NPs with Tf conjugation are able to cross through BBB and penetrate into the brain tissues via receptor-mediated endocytosis” [32]. Rapidly dividing cells (e.g., tumor cells) require more iron and typically have upregulated TfR. Transferrin targeting has been shown to be effective in many tumor targeting studies using nanoparticles [29,31,32,33,34,35]. Preliminary tests of Niodx conjugated to Tf indicated 3–5 times greater U87 tumor cell binding and uptake of Niodx in vitro (Figure 14).

1.8. Iodine-Enhanced Radiotherapy of Brain Metastases

Tumors that metastasize to the brain actually comprise 90% of brain tumors. Metastatic tumors (e.g., lung, breast, and melanoma) grow very differently in the brain compared to gliomas (Figure 15a,b).
Gliomas are highly invasive, expanding and emanating from the origin site. In contrast, metastatic tumors often have multiple contained lesions with well-defined growing edges (Figure 15a,b). Such tumors grown intracranially (IC) in mice showed similar morphologies (Figure 15c,d). They also accumulate Niodx after IV injection and displayed a higher concentration at the growing edge, similar to human brain mets (Figure 15b,d). The intensities seen in the X-ray images are proportional to the iodine concentration. Iodine concentrations were quantified by calibrating the microCT images using iodine standards. The growing edge of the metastatic lesion, such as those seen in Figure 15d, showed an average iodine concentration of 2.9% (w/w) with many peaks at 4.5%. Monte Carlo calculations indicated this could amplify the radiation dose there approximately 5 to 8 times (Table 1).
This level of in vivo tumor concentration and dose enhancement has never before been achieved by IV injection. To test the resultant therapeutic benefit, brains were irradiated one day after IV injection. Results are shown in Figure 16 [11].
With RT alone, all animals died within 72 days; Niodx pretreatment resulted in extraordinary longer-term remissions, with 40% of mice surviving 150 days and 30% surviving > 280 days.

1.9. Iodine Nanoparticle Targeting to Brain Metastases

Active targeting can significantly improve tumor uptake. For example, coating nanoparticles with gallic acid (probably self-polymerized) was recently shown to increase binding to orthotopic GL261 gliomas in mice from 3.6% ID/g to 13.5% (3.75-fold) compared to PEG coated NPs [36]. For Niodx, an interesting interaction was discovered where the iodine nanoparticle specifically bound to human triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) tumors growing in the brains of athymic mice [37]. This specific binding increased iodine loading concentrations from about 1% iodine for U87 gliomas to 3% (average tumor concentration at the growing edge) for the 231 TNBC growing in the mouse brain [11,27]. The nature of this molecular binding is still under investigation. It appears that the PEG on the Niodx binds specifically to vascular mimicry surfaces expressing collagen-1, which are not found in the rest of the brain (Figure 17).
Interestingly, in this breast to brain metastasis model, there was an abundance of vascular mimicry typified by irregularly shaped spaces (ISS [37]) instead of normal, more circular endothelial cell-lined tumor vessels (cf. Figure 12). This may partially explain why anti-angiogenic therapies, such as bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor targeting endothelial cells, are poorly effective when used to treat some tumors.

1.10. Optimal X-ray Energy

It should be noted that the best absorption of X-rays for iodine compared to tissue occurs in the ‘orthovoltage’ range (<400 kV, Figure 18). In a very useful region, iodine absorbs better than gold.
All hospital X-ray imaging uses orthovoltage, such as CT scanners, imaging for heart stenting or bypasses, vascular surgery, orthopedic operations, chest X-rays, and mammography. However, most radiotherapy is performed with 6–10 million volt (MV) machines that minimize skin entrance dose absorption and have better body penetration. From Figure 18 it can be seen that high-Z elements have little advantage over soft tissue at MV energies. Nevertheless, a number of studies have shown radioenhancement of heavy element nanoparticles at these high energies, perhaps due to more complex physical, chemical, or biological interactions [9]. This points to the difficulty in comparing radiation enhancers, as effects depend on many parameters that can be optimized.

2. Materials and Methods

The Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory has developed a standardized analytical cascade that performs physicochemical characterization as well as preclinical testing of the immunology, pharmacology, and toxicology properties of nanoparticles. Protocols, with explicit materials and methods for each of the tests reported here, are available online [38].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. National Cancer Institute Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory Study of Niodx

For clinical use, the iodine nanoparticles must be well-characterized and shown to be safe at useful doses. To provide these data for promising nanoparticles, the National Cancer Institute created the Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory (NCL, https://ncl.cancer.gov/ (accessed on 28 December 2021)). Niodx was submitted to them for testing. Over a period of about 3 years, comprehensive tests were performed; some of these studies overlapped with safety studies that we performed previously [21]. The complete report (193 pages) of the Iodine nanoparticles (Niodx, also designated NCL388 in the NCL report) is included in the Supplementary Materials. The nanoparticles were characterized by physicochemical properties, in vitro toxicity in several cell lines, in vitro hematological compatibility, and in vivo pharmacokinetic properties. The most significant findings from these studies are summarized below.

3.1.1. Sterility, Endotoxin, and Beta-Glucans

Niodx was evaluated for sterility and endotoxin contamination before other biological assays were conducted. Samples for testing had no bacterial contamination. Endotoxin levels were initially at approximately 1 EU/mg of iodine as detected by the turbidity and chromogenic Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) assays. Filtration using Mustang E-filters was able to reduce these levels by about 10-fold. Despite this reduction, however, the current levels were still above the calculated allowable endotoxin limit due to the high dose intended for clinical use (7 g/kg). Adjusting the dose to 291.7 mg/kg/h and increasing the infusion time to 24 h would allow for delivery of the intended 7g/kg dose to humans without exceeding the threshold pyrogenic dose of 5 EU/kg/h, provided the endotoxin level in the formulation does not exceed 0.017 EU/mg.

3.1.2. Physicochemical Characterization

The physicochemical properties of Niodx, including size and size distribution, molecular weight, zeta potential, iodine concentration, iohexol concentration, and PEG concentration, were evaluated using a variety of techniques.
The hydrodynamic size was measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS). The volume-weighted peak sizes were in agreement with the reported values and were in the range of 11–22 nm. There was good batch-to-batch consistency noted for most lots with respect to size. Particle size and molecular weight for Niodx were also measured by asymmetric-flow fractionation (AF4) and size exclusion chromatography coupled with multiple angle light scattering (MALS) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) detectors. The AF4-DLS measured average size was 21 nm, consistent with batch-mode DLS measurements. The molar mass based on the refractive index signal was 142 kDa and 163 kDa based on the AF4 and SEC results, respectively.
The iodine concentration of Niodx was determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Iodine concentrations were in agreement with the sponsor’s reported values. Importantly, a microwave step is required for complete digestion and accurate quantitation of the iodine in the Niodx samples. The PEG+linker and iohexol concentrations were determined using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The iohexol and PEG+linker concentrations were 68.7% (w/w) and 28.7% (w/w), respectively. The zeta potential was neutral under the measurement conditions utilized. This was expected due to the composition of the formulation.

3.1.3. In Vitro Toxicity Studies

The toxicity of Niodx was evaluated in vitro using two cell lines, porcine renal proximal tubule (LLC-PK1), and human hepatocarcinoma (Hep G2) cells. The formulation showed greater toxicity to the LLC-PK1 cells than the Hep G2 cells, with estimated IC50 values of 0.89 and 5.03 mg/mL, respectively. In addition, Niodx induced autophagic dysfunction in the LLC-PK1 cells at cytotoxic concentrations, and this is a potential mechanism of cell death. However, in vivo tests did not reveal such toxicities.

3.1.4. In Vitro Immunological Characterization

The hematotoxicity of Niodx was assessed in vitro using freshly drawn human blood. In brief, Niodx was not hemolytic, did not induce complement activation or platelet aggregation, and did not affect collagen-mediated platelet aggregation at the tested concentrations. The formulation did exhibit prolongation of plasma coagulation times in both the thrombin and activated partial thromboplastin time assays. This finding is consistent with the known effects of iohexol on blood coagulation [39].
Interestingly, NCL388 induced chemokine response in human PBMC. As chemokines function to recruit immune cells, the data suggest a potential utility of NCL388 to improve the efficacy of traditional immunotherapeutics (e.g., anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4). The role of these chemokines in the safety of NCL388 is currently unknown. Aas IL-8 is known as one of pyrogenic markers, an elevation of body temperature in sensitive individuals may be observed after the administration of NCL388. However, the risk of pyrogenicity does not appear high, because other cytokines with more prominent roles in the fever response (TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-6) were not induced by NCL388. These findings warrant additional investigation.

3.1.5. Multidose Toxicity Study (ADME-Tox)

The intravenous multidose toxicity study compared two dose levels, administered for four consecutive daily doses (qdx4) (cumulative dose of 855 and 1715 mg I/kg, respectively), and a saline control. Each dose level and saline control contained a main group (assayed 1 day after the last dose) and a recovery group (assayed 14 days after the last dose). The administration of Niodx resulted in multisystemic histiocytosis of all organs as confirmed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Histiocytic infiltrate was dose-dependent, and progressed in recovery groups. The histiocytosis noted is most likely the result of iodine nanoparticle accumulation in tissue macrophages, as has been shown for other biopersistent polymers such as PEGylated therapeutics (Irizarry et al., 2018). Other histopathological changes were not observed, nor were alterations in hematological or clinical chemistry parameters that would indicate toxicity.
Spleen and liver weights were increased compared to the control in both treated main and recovery groups, with weights greater in the recovery groups as compared to the main groups. In the liver, TEM analysis showed intracytoplasmic vacuoles present within Kupffer cells and sinusoidal endothelial cells, consistent with iodine polymer uptake. The increase in organ weights was associated with histiocytosis in the absence of other significant findings. Mild neutrophilia was also present in all treated groups, with the main groups being less severe than the recovery groups. There were no other findings of biological significance noted for this study.

4. Conclusions

A novel iodine nanoparticle (Niodx) is described with unique properties. In particular, it is a 20 nm nanoparticle with a long blood half-life of 40 h and is well-tolerated at an intravenous dose of 7 g iodine/kg (in mice). It accumulates in gliomas and brain metastases and provides robust tumor imaging, potentially useful for diagnostic purposes and alignment for surgeries or radiotherapy. High tumor loading with iodine results in absorbing more X-rays during radiotherapy, thus boosting the local dose at the tumor several-fold, which is shown to provide significant life extension compared to radiotherapy alone. It is a promising new treatment for gliomas and other cancers. Extensive pharmacological testing has shown that Niodx appears safe for in vivo use.

Supplementary Materials

The following is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics14030508/s1, NCL Niodx study report.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.F.H. and H.M.S.; methodology, J.F.H., S.M.R., Y.S. and H.M.S.; software, J.F.H. and S.M.R.; validation, J.F.H., S.M.R., Y.S. and H.M.S.; formal analysis, J.F.H., S.M.R., Y.S. and H.M.S.; investigation, J.F.H., S.M.R., Y.S. and H.M.S.; resources, J.F.H., S.M.R., Y.S. and H.M.S.; data curation, J.F.H., S.M.R., Y.S. and H.M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.F.H.; writing—review and editing, J.F.H., S.M.R., Y.S. and H.M.S.; visualization, J.F.H. and S.M.R.; supervision, J.F.H. and H.M.S.; project administration, J.F.H. and H.M.S.; funding acquisition, J.F.H. and H.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by N.I.H., grant number 1R43CA192702 and The Connecticut Brain Tumor Alliance.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal studies were conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Connecticut Health Center (protocol # AP-200354-0224, approved 28 May 2021).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

We dedicate this paper to the memory of Tracy Gammer-Fanning, founder of the Connecticut Brain Tumor Alliance. The authors thank the Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory (NCL) for characterization support of this project; the formulation described herein was characterized by the NCL’s free Assay Cascade characterization service for cancer nanomedicines. This project has been funded in whole or in part with Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. 75N91019D00024. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Conflicts of Interest

James Hainfeld is a part owner of Nanoprobes, Inc. Other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Karlsson, J.; Luly, K.M.; Tzeng, S.Y.; Green, J.J. Nanoparticle designs for delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics as brain cancer therapies. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2021, 179, 113999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sevastre, A.S.; Costachi, A.; Tataranu, L.G.; Brandusa, C.; Artene, S.A.; Stovicek, O.; Alexandru, O.; Danoiu, S.; Sfredel, V.; Dricu, A. Glioblastoma pharmacotherapy: A multifaceted perspective of conventional and emerging treatments (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Boateng, F.; Ngwa, W. Delivery of Nanoparticle-Based Radiosensitizers for Radiotherapy Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 21, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Butterworth, K.T.; McMahon, S.J.; Currell, F.J.; Prise, K.M. Physical basis and biological mechanisms of gold nanoparticle radiosensitization. Nanoscale. 2012, 4, 4830–4838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Howard, D.; Sebastian, S.; Le, Q.V.; Thierry, B.; Kempson, I. Chemical Mechanisms of Nanoparticle Radiosensitization and Radioprotection: A Review of Structure-Function Relationships Influencing Reactive Oxygen Species. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kempson, I. Mechanisms of nanoparticle radiosensitization. Wiley Interdiscip Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 13, e1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rosa, S.; Connolly, C.; Schettino, G.; Butterworth, K.T.; Prise, K.M. Biological mechanisms of gold nanoparticle radiosensitization. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ruiz-Garcia, H.; Ramirez-Loera, C.; Malouff, T.D.; Seneviratne, D.S.; Palmer, J.D.; Trifiletti, D.M. Novel Strategies for Nanoparticle-Based Radiosensitization in Glioblastoma. Int J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schuemann, J.; Bagley, A.F.; Berbeco, R.; Bromma, K.; Butterworth, K.T.; Byrne, H.L.; Chithrani, B.D.; Cho, S.H.; Cook, J.R.; Favaudon, V.; et al. Roadmap for metal nanoparticles in radiation therapy: Current status, translational challenges, and future directions. Phys. Med. Biol. 2020, 65, 21RM02. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, H.; Mu, X.; He, H.; Zhang, X.D. Cancer Radiosensitizers. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 39, 24–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hainfeld, J.F.; Ridwan, S.M.; Stanishevskiy, F.Y.; Smilowitz, H.M. Iodine nanoparticle radiotherapy of human breast cancer growing in the brains of athymic mice. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Spiers, F.W. The influence of energy absorption and electron range on dosage in irradiated bone. Brit. J. Radiol. 1949, 22, 521–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Santos Mello, R.; Callisen, H.; Winter, J.; Kagan, A.R.; Norman, A. Radiation dose enhancement in tumors with iodine. Med. Phys. 1983, 10, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rose, J.H.; Norman, A.; Ingram, M.; Aoki, C.; Solberg, T.; Mesa, A. First radiotherapy of human metastatic brain tumors delivered by a computerized tomography scanner (CTRx). Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1999, 45, 1127–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Adam, J.F.; Balosso, J.; Renier, M.; Elleaume, H.; Estève, F.; Berkvens, P.; Nemoz, C.; Brochard, T.; Tessier, A.; Verry, C.; et al. Synchrotron Stereotactic Radiation Therapy: A Report on Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial Achievements, Ongoing Developments, and Long-Term Prospects. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2016, 96, E624–E625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Obeid, L.; Deman, P.; Tessier, A.; Balosso, J.; Esteve, F.; Adam, J.F. Absolute perfusion measurements and associated iodinated contrast agent time course in brain metastasis: A study for contrast-enhanced radiotherapy. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2014, 34, 638–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dean, P.B.; Kivisaari, L.; Kormano, M. Contrast enhancement pharmacokinetics of six ionic and nonionic contrast media. Investig. Radiol. 1983, 18, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hainfeld, J.F.; Slatkin, D.N.; Smilowitz, H.M. The use of gold nanoparticles to enhance radiotherapy in mice. Phys. Med. Biol. 2004, 49, N309–N315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yu, J. Intestinal stem cell injury and protection during cancer therapy. Transl. Cancer Res. 2013, 2, 384–396. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hainfeld, J.F.; Smilowitz, H.M.; O’Connor, M.J.; Dilmanian, F.A.; Slatkin, D.N. Gold nanoparticle imaging and radiotherapy of brain tumors in mice. Nanomedicine (London) 2013, 8, 1601–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hainfeld, J.F.; Ridwan, S.M.; Stanishevskiy, Y.; Smilowitz, N.R.; Davis, J.; Smilowitz, H.M. Small, Long Blood Half-Life Iodine Nanoparticle for Vascular and Tumor Imaging. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Fleming, C.J.; Salisbury, E.L.; Kirwan, P.; Painter, D.M.; Barnetson, R.S. Chrysiasis after low-dose gold and UV light exposure. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1996, 34, 349–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hadrup, N.; Lam, H.R. Oral toxicity of silver ions, silver nanoparticles and colloidal silver—A review. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2014, 68, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yu, S.B.; Watson, A.D. Metal-Based X-ray Contrast Media. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2353–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Maeda, H.; Nakamura, H.; Fang, J. The EPR effect for macromolecular drug delivery to solid tumors: Improvement of tumor uptake, lowering of systemic toxicity, and distinct tumor imaging in vivo. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 65, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bhowmik, A.; Khan, R.; Ghosh, M.K. Blood brain barrier: A challenge for effectual therapy of brain tumors. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Hainfeld, J.F.; Ridwan, S.M.; Stanishevskiy, Y.; Panchal, R.; Slatkin, D.N.; Smilowitz, H.M. Iodine nanoparticles enhance radiotherapy of intracerebral human glioma in mice and increase efficacy of chemotherapy. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ashton, J.R.; Castle, K.D.; Qi, Y.; Kirsch, D.G.; West, J.L.; Badea, C.T. Dual-Energy CT Imaging of Tumor Liposome Delivery After Gold Nanoparticle-Augmented Radiation Therapy. Theranostics 2018, 8, 1782–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Heggannavar, G.B.; Hiremath, C.G.; Achari, D.D.; Pangarkar, V.G.; Kariduraganavar, M.Y. Development of Doxorubicin-Loaded Magnetic Silica-Pluronic F-127 Nanocarriers Conjugated with Transferrin for Treating Glioblastoma across the Blood-Brain Barrier Using an in Vitro Model. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 8017–8026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tortorella, S.; Karagiannis, T.C. Transferrin receptor-mediated endocytosis: A useful target for cancer therapy. J. Membr. Biol. 2014, 247, 291–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wyatt, E.A.; Davis, M.E. Method of establishing breast cancer brain metastases affects brain uptake and efficacy of targeted, therapeutic nanoparticles. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2019, 4, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Choudhury, H.; Pandey, M.; Chin, P.X.; Phang, Y.L.; Cheah, J.Y.; Ooi, S.C.; Mak, K.K.; Pichika, M.R.; Kesharwani, P.; Hussain, Z.; et al. Transferrin receptors-targeting nanocarriers for efficient targeted delivery and transcytosis of drugs into the brain tumors: A review of recent advancements and emerging trends. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2018, 8, 1545–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bao, W.; Liu, R.; Xia, G.; Wang, F.; Chen, B. Applications of daunorubicin-loaded PLGA-PLL-PEG-Tf nanoparticles in hematologic malignancies: An in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2019, 13, 1107–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Gao, J.; Wang, Z.; Liu, H.; Wang, L.; Huang, G. Liposome encapsulated of temozolomide for the treatment of glioma tumor: Preparation, characterization and evaluation. Drug Discov. Ther. 2015, 9, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Lam, F.C.; Morton, S.W.; Wyckoff, J.; Vu Han, T.L.; Hwang, M.K.; Maffa, A.; Balkanska-Sinclair, E.; Yaffe, M.B.; Floyd, S.R.; Hammond, P.T. Enhanced efficacy of combined temozolomide and bromodomain inhibitor therapy for gliomas using targeted nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, F.; Wu, H.; Peng, B.; Zhang, S.; Ma, J.; Deng, G.; Zou, P.; Liu, J.; Chen, A.T.; Li, D.; et al. Vessel-Targeting Nanoclovers Enable Noninvasive Delivery of Magnetic Hyperthermia-Chemotherapy Combination for Brain Cancer Treatment. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 8111–8118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ridwan, S.M.; Hainfeld, J.F.; Ross, V.; Stanishevskiy, Y.; Smilowitz, H.M. Novel Iodine nanoparticles target vascular mimicry in intracerebral triple negative human MDA-MB-231 breast tumors. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory Assay Cascade Protocols. Available online: https://ncl.cancer.gov/resources/assay-cascade-protocols (accessed on 7 February 2022).
  39. Krause, W.; Press, W.R. Influence of contrast media on blood coagulation. Investig. Radiol. 1997, 32, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g001 550
Figure 1. High-Z atoms absorb X-rays and eject electrons creating tissue-damaging free radicals.
Figure 1. High-Z atoms absorb X-rays and eject electrons creating tissue-damaging free radicals.
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g001
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g002 550
Figure 2. X-rays that would normally pass through tissue are instead absorbed by high atomic number nanoparticles and the energy deposited locally, boosting local dose [11].
Figure 2. X-rays that would normally pass through tissue are instead absorbed by high atomic number nanoparticles and the energy deposited locally, boosting local dose [11].
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g002
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g003 550
Figure 3. Iohexol (Omnipaque®). Molecular weight 821, 46.4% iodine by weight.
Figure 3. Iohexol (Omnipaque®). Molecular weight 821, 46.4% iodine by weight.
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g003
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g004 550
Figure 4. Survival graph showing 86% survival at 1 year after tumor loading with intravenous gold nanoparticles (AuNPs).
Figure 4. Survival graph showing 86% survival at 1 year after tumor loading with intravenous gold nanoparticles (AuNPs).
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g004
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g005 550
Figure 5. Live mouse microCT images of gliomas 9 days post implantation. (A,B) Same mouse before (A) and 15 h after (B) intravenous (IV) injection (4 g Au/kg); (C) Larger tumor imaged 15 h after IV injection of 1.7 g Au/kg. X-ray source was 45 kVp. Bars (B,C) = 5 mm.
Figure 5. Live mouse microCT images of gliomas 9 days post implantation. (A,B) Same mouse before (A) and 15 h after (B) intravenous (IV) injection (4 g Au/kg); (C) Larger tumor imaged 15 h after IV injection of 1.7 g Au/kg. X-ray source was 45 kVp. Bars (B,C) = 5 mm.
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g005
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g006 550
Figure 6. Survival graph of mice bearing invasive orthotopic gliomas showing rapid demise with no treatment, no benefit from AuNPs only, some life extension with radiotherapy (RT) only, and 50% long-term survival (no tumor detectable after 1 year) when RT was combined with a prior IV injection of AuNPs. Durable responses seen here may have been due, in part, to a functional immune system.
Figure 6. Survival graph of mice bearing invasive orthotopic gliomas showing rapid demise with no treatment, no benefit from AuNPs only, some life extension with radiotherapy (RT) only, and 50% long-term survival (no tumor detectable after 1 year) when RT was combined with a prior IV injection of AuNPs. Durable responses seen here may have been due, in part, to a functional immune system.
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g006
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Normal nude mouse; (b) nude mouse 24 h after tail vein injection of 1 g/kg 15nm PEG coated AuNPs. Skin color change was almost immediate after AuNP injection and showed little change even after 1 year; (c) nude mouse 24 h after intravenous injection of 4 g iodine/kg iodine nanoparticles.
Figure 7. (a) Normal nude mouse; (b) nude mouse 24 h after tail vein injection of 1 g/kg 15nm PEG coated AuNPs. Skin color change was almost immediate after AuNP injection and showed little change even after 1 year; (c) nude mouse 24 h after intravenous injection of 4 g iodine/kg iodine nanoparticles.
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g007
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Electron micrograph; (b) dynamic light scattering; and (c) schematic of the iodine nanoparticles (Niodx).
Figure 8. (a) Electron micrograph; (b) dynamic light scattering; and (c) schematic of the iodine nanoparticles (Niodx).
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g008
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g009 550
Figure 9. Niodx is made from crosslinked iohexol with a PEG coating.
Figure 9. Niodx is made from crosslinked iohexol with a PEG coating.
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g009
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g010 550
Figure 10. MicroCT images of orthotopic gliomas growing in brains of athymic mice. (a) Before Niodx injection; (b) same mouse 24 h after intravenous injection (Niodx, 3.5 g iodine/kg); (c) Different mouse but taken 3 days after IV Niodx injection. X-ray source was 70 kVp.
Figure 10. MicroCT images of orthotopic gliomas growing in brains of athymic mice. (a) Before Niodx injection; (b) same mouse 24 h after intravenous injection (Niodx, 3.5 g iodine/kg); (c) Different mouse but taken 3 days after IV Niodx injection. X-ray source was 70 kVp.
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g010
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g011 550
Figure 11. Kaplan–Meier survival graph showing survival vs. days after implantation of orthotopic U87 tumors. RT only (15 Gy, n = 6) extended life on average (at the 50% level, small blue arrow) by 16 days (compared to no treatment, n = 8), but 7 g I/kg Niodx + 15 Gy (n = 8) extended life by 38 days (2.4-fold). Inset shows the Niodx without radiation had no effect on survival. X-ray source was 100 kVp.
Figure 11. Kaplan–Meier survival graph showing survival vs. days after implantation of orthotopic U87 tumors. RT only (15 Gy, n = 6) extended life on average (at the 50% level, small blue arrow) by 16 days (compared to no treatment, n = 8), but 7 g I/kg Niodx + 15 Gy (n = 8) extended life by 38 days (2.4-fold). Inset shows the Niodx without radiation had no effect on survival. X-ray source was 100 kVp.
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g011
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g012 550
Figure 12. Histological section of an orthotopic human U87 glioma growing in the mouse brain. (a) is a coronal section of the whole brain with tumor in upper left. Green is a fluorescent secondary antibody immunolabeling an anti-PEG antibody, specific for the PEGylated iodine nanoparticle. The Niodx targets the tumor and the surrounding edematous growing region. Blue is DAPI, staining nuclei. (b) is a higher magnification of the tumor region. Niodx highly stains endothelium surrounding all tumor capillaries (round-like “holes” in image). Bars: left image 1 mm, right image 50 μm.
Figure 12. Histological section of an orthotopic human U87 glioma growing in the mouse brain. (a) is a coronal section of the whole brain with tumor in upper left. Green is a fluorescent secondary antibody immunolabeling an anti-PEG antibody, specific for the PEGylated iodine nanoparticle. The Niodx targets the tumor and the surrounding edematous growing region. Blue is DAPI, staining nuclei. (b) is a higher magnification of the tumor region. Niodx highly stains endothelium surrounding all tumor capillaries (round-like “holes” in image). Bars: left image 1 mm, right image 50 μm.
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g012
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g013 550
Figure 13. Survival graph showing results with Doxil, Niodx (INP), and radiotherapy (RT, 15 Gy). Groups: no treatment (n = 7), INP only (n = 6), RT (n = 9), RT + INP (n = 7), RT+Dox (n = 9), and RT + Dox + INP (n = 7). X-ray source was 100 kVp.
Figure 13. Survival graph showing results with Doxil, Niodx (INP), and radiotherapy (RT, 15 Gy). Groups: no treatment (n = 7), INP only (n = 6), RT (n = 9), RT + INP (n = 7), RT+Dox (n = 9), and RT + Dox + INP (n = 7). X-ray source was 100 kVp.
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g013
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g014 550
Figure 14. Uptake of Niodx targeted with transferrin (a) and non-targeted Niodx (b) 16 h after in vitro incubation with U87 human glioma cells. The uptake of iodine is about 5 times with the transferrin targeting in this study. Bars = 20 μm.
Figure 14. Uptake of Niodx targeted with transferrin (a) and non-targeted Niodx (b) 16 h after in vitro incubation with U87 human glioma cells. The uptake of iodine is about 5 times with the transferrin targeting in this study. Bars = 20 μm.
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g014
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g015 550
Figure 15. Gliomas and metastatic tumors grow differently in the brain as shown by (a) MRI scan of patient with GBM, (b) MRI scan of patient with triple negative breast cancer that has metastasized to the brain, (c) U87 glioma growing in the brain of an athymic mouse, and (d) human triple negative breast cancer growing in the brain of an athymic mouse. (c,d) are microCT X-ray images (70 kVp) 24 h after IV Niodx injection.
Figure 15. Gliomas and metastatic tumors grow differently in the brain as shown by (a) MRI scan of patient with GBM, (b) MRI scan of patient with triple negative breast cancer that has metastasized to the brain, (c) U87 glioma growing in the brain of an athymic mouse, and (d) human triple negative breast cancer growing in the brain of an athymic mouse. (c,d) are microCT X-ray images (70 kVp) 24 h after IV Niodx injection.
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g015
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g016 550
Figure 16. Survival graph showing no treatment (blue), RT only (15 Gy, 100 kVp, green), and INP + RT (red). n denotes number of animals per group. Arrow indicates day of irradiation.
Figure 16. Survival graph showing no treatment (blue), RT only (15 Gy, 100 kVp, green), and INP + RT (red). n denotes number of animals per group. Arrow indicates day of irradiation.
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g016
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g017 550
Figure 17. Confocal cryosection image of advanced human triple negative breast cancer tumor (MDA-MB-231) growing in athymic mouse brain 24 h after IV administration of Niodx. Tumor cells have been transduced with red fluorescent protein (td-tomato, red), and labeled for Niodx using an anti-PEG antibody (Alexa-488, green). No endothelial cells are present, and black spaces surrounded by tumor cells (red) are vascular channels formed by the tumor cells mimicking endothelial cells. Niodx shows strong binding to these channels [37]. Bar = 20 μm.
Figure 17. Confocal cryosection image of advanced human triple negative breast cancer tumor (MDA-MB-231) growing in athymic mouse brain 24 h after IV administration of Niodx. Tumor cells have been transduced with red fluorescent protein (td-tomato, red), and labeled for Niodx using an anti-PEG antibody (Alexa-488, green). No endothelial cells are present, and black spaces surrounded by tumor cells (red) are vascular channels formed by the tumor cells mimicking endothelial cells. Niodx shows strong binding to these channels [37]. Bar = 20 μm.
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g017
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g018 550
Figure 18. Absorption of iodine vs. gold and soft tissue. In a useful range, iodine absorbs 1.7 times more than gold and at iodine’s K-edge, it absorbs ~100 times more than tissue (on a weight basis). Absorption of high-Z elements compared to tissue is better in the kV range rather than the MV range.
Figure 18. Absorption of iodine vs. gold and soft tissue. In a useful range, iodine absorbs 1.7 times more than gold and at iodine’s K-edge, it absorbs ~100 times more than tissue (on a weight basis). Absorption of high-Z elements compared to tissue is better in the kV range rather than the MV range.
Pharmaceutics 14 00508 g018
Table
Table 1. Iodine uptake and calculated Dose Enhancement Factor (DEF) at 72 h after IV injection of 7 g I/kg Niodx for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) growing in brains of mice. Regions measured: tumor center, tumor growing edge, peak regions of growing edge, expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Table 1. Iodine uptake and calculated Dose Enhancement Factor (DEF) at 72 h after IV injection of 7 g I/kg Niodx for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) growing in brains of mice. Regions measured: tumor center, tumor growing edge, peak regions of growing edge, expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Tumor Center
(Average)		Growing Edge
(Average)		Peaks at Growing Edge (Average)
%Iodine1.13 ± 0.352.9 ± 0.544.52 ± 0.07
DEF2.775.488.01
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hainfeld, J.F.; Ridwan, S.M.; Stanishevskiy, Y.; Smilowitz, H.M. Iodine Nanoparticles (Niodx™) for Radiotherapy Enhancement of Glioblastoma and Other Cancers: An NCI Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory Study. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14030508

AMA Style

Hainfeld JF, Ridwan SM, Stanishevskiy Y, Smilowitz HM. Iodine Nanoparticles (Niodx™) for Radiotherapy Enhancement of Glioblastoma and Other Cancers: An NCI Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory Study. Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(3):508. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14030508

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hainfeld, James F., Sharif M. Ridwan, Yaroslav Stanishevskiy, and Henry M. Smilowitz. 2022. "Iodine Nanoparticles (Niodx™) for Radiotherapy Enhancement of Glioblastoma and Other Cancers: An NCI Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory Study" Pharmaceutics 14, no. 3: 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14030508

APA Style

Hainfeld, J. F., Ridwan, S. M., Stanishevskiy, Y., & Smilowitz, H. M. (2022). Iodine Nanoparticles (Niodx™) for Radiotherapy Enhancement of Glioblastoma and Other Cancers: An NCI Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory Study. Pharmaceutics, 14(3), 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14030508

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop