Next Article in Journal
Inorganic Nanomaterials in Tissue Engineering
Previous Article in Journal
The pH-Responsive Liposomes—The Effect of PEGylation on Release Kinetics and Cellular Uptake in Glioblastoma Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Up-to-Date Review of Natural Nanoparticles for Cancer Management
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Natural Nanoparticles: A Safe Bullet for Treatment and Detection of Solid Tumors

by
Serena Mazzucchelli
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Cliniche, Università di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy
Pharmaceutics 2022, 14(6), 1126; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14061126
Submission received: 11 May 2022 / Accepted: 23 May 2022 / Published: 25 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Nanoparticle for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment)
In the last couple of decades, nanoparticles have been extensively studied as carriers for cancer imaging agents and as drug delivery platforms, due to their ability to positively affect the distribution and tumor-targeting properties of delivered compounds [1,2]. However, nanoparticle off-target accumulation, immunogenicity, and sequestration by macrophages are issues that strongly limit their clinical translation [3,4]. These issues could be overcome by the use of natural nanoparticles, since they are mainly constituted by proteins or by cell membrane portions, resulting in high biocompatibility, stability in biological fluids and bioinvisibility [5]. This Special Issue depicts the current landscape of natural nanoparticles for cancer diagnosis and treatment, collecting articles able to better highlight any feature relating to this topic. Not only natural nanoparticles, such as exosomes and protein nanocages, but also organic nanoformulations of natural compounds, such as the flavonoid luteolin and the xanthone derivate α-mangostin [6,7,8,9], represent attractive options to improve knowledge in this area and to accelerate the translation of nanotechnological products to the clinic, as summarized by Ion. D. et al. [10]. Among natural nanoparticles, ferritins (HFn) are the most fascinating natural drug delivery system, and have been extensively investigated in relation to cancer due to their intrinsic tumor-targeting capability, as reported by Mainini F. et al., in this Special Issue [11]. HFn display the targeted recognition of cancer cells and tissues thanks to their ability to specifically recognize the transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1), which is overexpressed in tumors [11]. HFn-based nanoparticles have been engineered by DNA recombinant technology or by chemical surface modification, obtaining products exploitable for the treatment, diagnosis and theranostics of cancer, already tested both in vitro and in vivo with very promising results [11]. In addition to ferritin-based nanoparticles, an important position is occupied by exosomes, a class of natural nanosized vesicles derived by cells for intracellular communication and recently developed and assessed for drug delivery purposes [12]. They display a typical tropism determined by the cell subtype from which they are generated. Here, we report a study about exosomes from M1 macrophages loaded with the combination of gemcitabine and the oral iron chelator deferasirox, developed and tested for the treatment of gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer [13]. This work demonstrated how drug entrapment into M1-macrophage-derived exosomes is an effective strategy to bypass drug resistance in this pancreatic cancer model, suggesting that it could be successfully exploited for resistant pancreatic cancer and investigated in other cancer subtypes [13]. To date, the clinical exploitation of exosomes derived from human or mammalian sources is challenging, since the set-up of large-scale human or mammalian cultures to produce exosomes seems to limit the feasibility [14]. Recently, exosomes derived from the budding of bacterial membranes have been explored as a valuable alternative for large-scale productions [14]. The review of S. Fazal and R. Lee describes bacterial membrane vesicles (BMV), focusing attention on the sources used for their production and on techniques for separation, purification, characterization and drug loading. Moreover, also discussed was their exploitation as drug delivery platforms in cancer therapy, with some in vivo applications reported [14]. Finally, this Special Issue is completed by a literature review of nanotechnological solutions adopted for the delivery of RNA-i therapeutics in pancreatic cancers [15] and by natural carbon nanodots [16], a field of study that creates a bridge between synthetic and natural nanoparticles, since it employs classical chemical methods of synthesis starting from natural carbon sources [16].
Overall, the articles and reviews collected in this Special Issue describe a prolific and dynamic field of study, which promises to bring natural nanocarriers to cancer clinical trials, accelerating clinical translation.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anselmo, A.C.; Mitragotri, S. An overview of clinical and commercial impact of drug delivery systems. J. Control. Release 2014, 190, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Anselmo, A.C.; Mitragotri, S. Nanoparticles in the clinic: An update. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2019, 4, e10143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wong, J.K.L.; Mohseni, R.; Hamidieh, A.A.; MacLaren, R.E.; Habib, N.; Seifalian, A.M. Limitations in Clinical Translation of Nanoparticle-Based Gene Therapy. Trends Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Đorđević, S.; Gonzalez, M.M.; Conejos-Sánchez, I.; Carreira, B.; Pozzi, S.; Acúrcio, R.C.; Satchi-Fainaro, R.; Florindo, H.F.; Vicent, M.J. Current hurdles to the translation of nanomedicines from bench to the clinic. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2022, 12, 500–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hong, S.; Choi, D.W.; Kim, H.N.; Park, C.G.; Lee, W.; Park, H.H. Protein-Based Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Systems. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jafar, M.; Salahuddin, M.; Khan, M.S.A.; Alshehry, Y.; Alrwaili, N.R.; Alzahrani, Y.A.; Imam, S.S.; Alshehri, S. Preparation and In Vitro-In Vivo Evaluation of luteolin Loaded Gastroretentive microsponge for the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infections. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kazmi, I.; Alshehri, S.; Al-Abbasi, F.A.; Nadeem, M.S.; Altayb, H.N.; Imam, S.S. Formulation, Optimization and Evaluation of Luteolin-Loaded Topical Nanoparticulate Delivery System for the Skin Cancer. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Meylina, L.; Muchtaridi, M.; Joni, I.M.; Mohammed, A.F.A.; Wathoni, N. Nanoformulations of α-Mangostin for Cancer Drug Delivery System. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chiang, C.-S.; Huang, B.-J.; Chen, J.-Y.; Chieng, W.W.; Lim, S.H.; Lee, W.; Shyu, W.-C.; Jeng, L.-B. Fucoidan-Based Nanoparticles with Inherently Therapeutic Efficacy for Cancer Treatment. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ion, D.; Niculescu, A.-G.; Păduraru, D.N.; Andronic, O.; Mușat, F.; Grumezescu, A.M.; Bolocan, A. An Up-to-Date Review of Natural Nanoparticles for Cancer Management. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Mainini, F.; Bonizzi, A.; Sevieri, M.; Sitia, L.; Truffi, M.; Corsi, F.; Mazzucchelli, S. Protein-Based Nanoparticles for the Imaging and Treatment of Solid Tumors: The Case of Ferritin Nanocages, a Narrative Review. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nam, G.H.; Choi, Y.; Kim, G.B.; Kim, S.; Kim, S.A.; Kim, I.S. Emerging Prospects of Exosomes for Cancer Treatment: From Conventional Therapy to Immunotherapy. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2002440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhao, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Liu, T. M1 Macrophage-Derived Exosomes Loaded with Gemcitabine and Deferasirox against Chemoresistant Pancreatic Cancer. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fazal, S.; Lee, R. Biomimetic Bacterial Membrane Vesicles for Drug Delivery Applications. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, M.J.; Chang, H.; Nam, G.; Ko, Y.; Kim, S.H.; Roberts, T.M.; Ryu, J.H. RNAi-Based Approaches for Pancreatic Cancer Therapy. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chan, M.-H.; Chen, B.-G.; Ngo, L.T.; Huang, W.-T.; Li, C.-H.; Liu, R.-S.; Hsiao, M. Natural Carbon Nanodots: Toxicity Assessment and Theranostic Biological Application. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mazzucchelli, S. Natural Nanoparticles: A Safe Bullet for Treatment and Detection of Solid Tumors. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14061126

AMA Style

Mazzucchelli S. Natural Nanoparticles: A Safe Bullet for Treatment and Detection of Solid Tumors. Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(6):1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14061126

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mazzucchelli, Serena. 2022. "Natural Nanoparticles: A Safe Bullet for Treatment and Detection of Solid Tumors" Pharmaceutics 14, no. 6: 1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14061126

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop