Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comparative Analysis of Rapid Point-of-Care Infliximab, Adalimumab and Anti-Drug Antibodies’ Determination against ELISA
Previous Article in Journal
Complex Spectroscopy Studies of Nifedipine Photodegradation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Nanoformulations for Quercetin Delivery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Combination of Nanodelivery Systems and Constituents Derived from Novel Foods: A Comprehensive Review

by
Eleonora Truzzi
1,
Davide Bertelli
2,
Anna Rita Bilia
3,
Giulia Vanti
3,
Eleonora Maretti
2,* and
Eliana Leo
2,*
1
Department of Chemical and Geological Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via G. Campi 103, 41125 Modena, Italy
2
Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via G. Campi 103, 41125 Modena, Italy
3
Department of Chemistry “Ugo Schiff” (DICUS), University of Florence, Via Ugo Schiff 6, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2023, 15(11), 2614; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15112614
Submission received: 9 October 2023 / Revised: 3 November 2023 / Accepted: 8 November 2023 / Published: 11 November 2023

Abstract

:
Novel Food is a new category of food, regulated by the European Union Directive No. 2015/2283. This latter norm defines a food as “Novel” if it was not used “for human consumption to a significant degree within the Union before the date of entry into force of that regulation, namely 15 May 1997”. Recently, Novel Foods have received increased interest from researchers worldwide. In this sense, the key areas of interest are the discovery of new benefits for human health and the exploitation of these novel sources of materials in new fields of application. An emerging area in the pharmaceutical and medicinal fields is nanotechnology, which deals with the development of new delivery systems at a nanometric scale. In this context, this review aims to summarize the recent advances on the design and characterization of nanodelivery systems based on materials belonging to the Novel Food list, as well as on nanoceutical products formulated for delivering compounds derived from Novel Foods. Additionally, the safety hazard of using nanoparticles in food products, i.e., food supplements, has been discussed in view of the current European regulation, which considers nanomaterials as Novel Foods.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

According to the United Nations, the world’s population is estimated to reach 9.7 billion in 2050. Population growth is induced by the decreasing mortality rate and an average fertility still at high levels. The demographic increase will not be homogenously projected worldwide. Indeed, the global population increment is occurring mainly in Asian and African countries, where people are the most affected by hunger and the impossibility of following a balanced healthy diet [1]. This situation was exacerbated during the global COVID-19 pandemic period, and it is expected to tragically worsen. In 2009, the dramatic foreseen scenario alerted the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), which demanded a 70% increment in the global food production by 2050 in a sustainable manner [2]. In this context, innovation is essential for countering the drastic challenge that the food system is facing, and technological and scientific progress are precious allies. Novel Food represents an example of the fundamental role of innovation in guaranteeing food security. Indeed, Novel Food is a new category of foods regulated by the European Union. The first definition of Novel Food was laid down in the Regulation of the European Commission (EC) No. 258/97, which was repealed by Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. This latter norm defines a food as “Novel” if it was not used “for human consumption to a significant degree within the Union before the date of entry into force of that Regulation, namely 15 May 1997”. The EU regulation was then implemented by the Regulation (EU) 2017/2470, which provides a detailed list of Novel Foods [3]. This list is continuously updated by the Commission Implementing Regulations (EU). The list includes “foods derived from plants and animals, produced by non-traditional breeding techniques, and foods modified by new production processes, such as nanotechnology and nanoscience, which might have an impact on food”. Novel Foods are authorized by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) only if all the criteria laid down in Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 are fulfilled after performing a process of risk assessment. Specifically, Novel Foods should not be dangerous or misleading to consumers, and not be so different from the foods or food ingredients they are intended to replace (e.g., non-traditional production methods). Therefore, a Novel Food is after all considered as food for all intents and purposes. The denomination “Novel Food”, intended as “foods that have not been used for human consumption to a significant degree within the EU before 15 May 1997”, does not exist in many jurisdictions outside the European Union. As an example, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agency does not provide any formal definition or category for new foods. Conversely, any new food is regulated as any other food via the food additive process if it is not considered Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) or meets an exception under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [4].
The authorization process of Novel Foods was modified by Regulation (EU) 2018/456 to smooth and accelerate the approval. Indeed, unlike previously, the authorization is made by a centralized system. The EC analyzes each application to verify that all criteria are respected. Then, the application is submitted to EFSA for a scientific risk assessment instead of each EU member country. In this way, the entire process lasts for not more than nine months. This procedure is further sped up in the case of traditional food from a third country. In this instance, the submission of a notification to the EC is enough. After evaluating its validity, the EC has to forward the notification to the EFSA and member states and, if doubts about the safety are not raised, after four months, the traditional food is authorized to be placed on the market. A summary of this procedure is displayed in Figure 1.
Starting from the publication of the first Novel Food list in 2017, the rate of consumption of Novel Food has rapidly grown, supplying new sources of lipids, carbohydrates, proteins, fibers, and other nutrients with beneficial effects on human health. These classes of compounds have received increased interest from researchers worldwide. In this sense, the key areas of interest were the discovery of new benefits for human health and the exploitation of these novel sources of materials in new fields of application, such as pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical technology is one of the pharmaceutical sciences involving the formulation, preparation, and composition of commercially manufactured drugs. An emerging area in the pharmaceutical and medicinal fields is nanotechnology, which deals with developing, amongst others, new delivery systems at a nanometric (1 nm–100 nm) and micrometric (100 nm–100 μm) range (10 nm–1000 nm) [5]. Several nanocarriers have been approved for drug delivery vehicles in human applications, exhibiting a wide range of compositions and structures. In particular, this review focuses primarily on the prevalent polymeric- and lipid-based nanoparticles.
Nanocarriers were studied in depth and exploited in recent decades to increase the bioavailability and solubility of bioactive compounds, along with the improvement of their activity. Additionally, nanoparticles are capable of protecting physico-chemically labile bioactive compounds, providing them with an extended stability during storage or under physiological conditions. Nanotechnology has been applied both to deliver compounds with health properties and to produce nanoparticles using food-derived materials, also called “nanoceutical materials”, for embedding compounds with beneficial activities on human health. Consumers’ increasing interest and trust in natural health products have boosted this scientific research in recent decades, as previously reported [6]. Nutraceuticals are essential nutrients for human health and well-being and are present in edible food products. Numerous in vitro studies have proved that many nutraceuticals are multifunctional compounds with healthy features comparable to those of conventional drugs. For this reason, nutraceuticals are considered “pharmaceutical-grade compounds”.
Due to their natural source, Novel Food can represent another new and not fully exploited reservoir of nutraceuticals. Indeed, Novel Food can also be considered an important source of raw matter to produce a nano-drug delivery system. The application of Novel Foods as new nanoceutical materials or bioactive compounds embedded into nanocarriers is a new research field, as these sources have been employed only in recent decades (Figure 2). Thus, this review aims to summarize the recent advances in the production of nanocarrier systems for delivering Novel Foods and nanocarriers based on nanoceutical materials belonging to the Novel Food list. This review considers the new advances from 2018 to the present, focusing on “nano-” strategies for oral administration.

2. Novel Food Materials for Nanoparticle Production

The main advantages of using food-derived materials for the fabrication of nanoparticles are the extremely high biocompatibility, safety, and respect of the food-grade requisites, such as the employment of solvents that comply with food-grade standards. This latter aspect is essential for the potential application of nanoparticles in food supplements or fortified foods with an increased nutritional value. In this section, only materials extracted from Novel Foods were considered, and their advantages were underlined.

2.1. Polymeric Nanoparticles

Nanoparticle-mediated smart delivery systems (np-DS) can exhibit favorable multifunctional characteristics for the delivery of nutrients or bioactive molecules for successful targeting. In this scenario, the np-DS application is evolving from traditional raw food products to advanced technologies in novel food engineering, which ensure purity and functionality.
Polymeric particles (PNp), intended as nano- and microparticles, are an important class of drug delivery system for the suitable delivery of bioactive compounds. PNp are defined as particles of diameter <1 μm composed of either biodegradable or non-biodegradable biopolymers that have been recently reviewed by M. Elmowafy et al. [7]. The most recent source of polymers for PNp synthesis are Novel Foods, as summarized in Table 1.
Chitosan is the most applied polymer from Novel Food used in PNp assembling. Chitosan is derived from chitin, a naturally occurring polysaccharide found in the exoskeletons of crabs, lobsters, shrimp, and insects. Chitosan is essentially the N-deacetylated form of chitin and is composed of 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-β-d-glucose units linked together through β (1→4) linkage. Chitin, like cellulose, serves as a structural polysaccharide in these organisms, but it differs from cellulose in various ways. Chitin is highly hydrophobic and does not dissolve in water or most organic solvents. However, when chitin undergoes deacetylation, it transforms into chitosan, which is soluble in dilute acids, such as acetic and formic acids. Chitosan possesses several advantageous characteristics, including being non-toxic, biocompatible, and biodegradable [54]. To produce 1 kg of chitosan with a 70% deacetylation level from shrimp shells, you would need 6.3 kg of hydrochloric acid (HCl) and 1.8 kg of sodium hydroxide (NaOH). This process also requires nitrogen, processed water (0.5 t), and cooling water (0.9 t). When estimating the production cost of chitosan, it is important to consider various factors, such as transportation costs, which can vary depending on labor expenses and the location of the production facility. These costs can have a significant impact on the overall cost of chitosan production [55]. Different varieties of fungi are selected as a source of chitosan among the novel foods. Fungi are organisms that contain chitin as a major structural component in their cell walls [56]. For example, Absidia coerulea and Aspergillus niger were found to have a high proportion of chitin and chitosan [57,58]. Moreover, chitosan can be prepared using mycelia waste or mushroom industry waste. The fungal waste biomass is of growing importance, and is generated by biotech industries and the fermentation of zygomycete mushrooms. As a matter of fact, thousands of tons of waste fungal biomass are produced by Mycotech industries every year and are landfilled or incinerated for easy disposal. The use of mushrooms as a source of chitosan is advantageous due to the homogeneity and highly deacetylated nature of the product [56]. Mane and co-workers examined fungal organisms in the waste fungal biomass of the wine and mushroom industries and the fermentation of the zygomycete fungus B. poitrasii [12]. In addition to the production and characterization of the extracted chitosan, the synthesis of fungal chitosan nanoparticles was also conducted to determine their antifungal potential against human pathogenic fungi. Chitosan obtained from ascomycete yeast and basidiomycete fungi has a lower molecular weight when compared to chitosan from B. poitrasii. Additionally, it exhibits poor antifungal properties, which can be attributed to its very low molecular weight and low polycationic nature, meaning it has a low percentage of deacetylation when compared to the chitosan from B. poitrasii. Even though the raw waste biomass available for ascomycetes and basidiomycetes fungi may be more abundant, the chitosan extracted from them cannot be effectively used for sanitary applications due to its low cationic nature, which affects its antifungal properties. The authors suggest that % deacetylation is more important than molecular weight for the antifungal activity of chitosan polymers and their nanoparticles. In contrast, chitosan isolated from the zygomycete fungus B. poitrasii, with a deacetylation level of 92.78% and a molecular weight of 46.33 kDa, appears to be a promising source for healthcare applications due to its higher cationic nature and better antifungal potential. Nanoparticles produced using chitosan from B. poitrasii have demonstrated effective inhibition of the growth of human fungal pathogens at a lower minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC90) when compared to the traditional chitosan polymer. These findings suggest that chitosan nanoparticles prepared from B. poitrasii chitosan, particularly when it has a high deacetylation level, have the potential to be a powerful and safe natural antifungal agent.
Wu et al. demonstrated that fungal chitosan from the mycelia of Agaricus bisporus (Lange) Sing Chaidam was similar to commercial crab chitosan [13]. In this context, chitosan derived from fungi with a lower molecular weight was employed to coat modified betulinic acid-loaded liposomes. When compared to the commercially available crab chitosan, these fungal chitosan-coated liposomes exhibit several advantages, including smaller particle size, increased stability, and enhanced encapsulation efficiency. The zeta potential and encapsulation efficiency of these liposomes depend on the concentration of the chitosan used in the coating process.
Another important polysaccharide is the guar gum obtained from the ground endosperm of the seed of natural strains of guar Cyamopsis tetragonolobus L. Taub. (Leguminosae family). Guar gum is a polymer capable of creating a hydrocolloid system in the presence of water and is resistant to the conditions of the gastrointestinal tract, such as acidic pH and microorganisms. Furthermore, guar displays beneficial properties, such as the control of diabetes, and anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activities. Nanoformulations based on guar gum are able to protect the embedded compound from the stomach to the colon, to treat diseases associated with the last tract of the intestine [27].
Starting with Astragalus membranaceus, a mushroom used in traditional Chinese medicine for more than 2000 years to strengthen human immunity and cardiovascular disorders [59,60], polysaccharides named Astragalus polysaccharides (APS) were extracted with water from Astragalus roots [61]. These are some of the main active components of Astragalus membranaceus and are listed as Novel Food. APS has potent anti-inflammatory, organ protective, anti-insulin resistant, and anti-tumor activities and consists of rhamnose, arabinose, and glucose [62,63]. To improve their activity, Meng et al. formulated APS as nanoparticles by cross-linking them with sodium selenite via simple preparation conditions [8]. The bioactivities of selenium–aminopolysaccharide (Se-APS) were investigated in vitro. The results demonstrated that APS-selenide nanoparticles have the potential to not only enhance the proliferation of T-lymphocytes but also effectively inhibit the malignant proliferation of HepG2 cells. Moreover, they were found to reduce cell migration and invasion. These findings suggest that Se-APS nanoparticles hold promise as a novel supplement due to their high selenium content and strong bioactivity. Similarly, nanoparticles composed of starch from Digitaria exilis were obtained via cross-linking with multifunctional excipients, such as citric acid and sodium tripolyphosphate. These nanoparticles were designed for the delivery of ibuprofen [20].
Among novel and organic-based polysaccharide biopolymers, chondroitin sulphate (CS)—from edible marine (such as crustaceans, mollusks, and Echinodermata) and animal skin and cartilage—captured increasing attention for various biomedical applications, particularly as the main component of np-DS [14,15]. CS is also present in several food supplements as an alternative medicine to treat osteoarthritis; however, being extracted from natural sources, its chemical composition and biological efficacy might extremely vary. An alternative method for the production of CS was proposed and involves the chemical sulphation of chondroitin derived from fermentation with the bacterium Escherichia coli. This type of CS is included in the Novel Food list. CS is a negatively charged heteropolysaccharide belonging to the family of sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). It is found in a wide range of organisms, including vertebrates, invertebrates, and bacteria. The length of the CS chain can vary depending on its source of origin. For instance, tracheal chondroitin sulfate typically has a molecular weight in the range of 20–25 kDa, while shark chondroitin sulfate tends to have a higher molecular weight, typically falling within the range of 50–80 kDa [16]. CS is valued for its various therapeutic properties, which include anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-thrombotic effects. These effects are primarily attributed to its ability to reduce the levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), nuclear factor- κβ (NF-κβ), and matrix-degrading enzymes [64]. As a result of these properties, CS is utilized as both a nutritional supplement and an over-the-counter drug for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Furthermore, CS possesses versatile characteristics that make it an ideal biomaterial for the development of np-DS. These systems can be used for the controlled release of anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory drugs, antigens, and protein/peptide molecules. This potential for a sustained release has been reviewed in a recent work by Sharma and colleagues [14]. Given its high hydrodynamic volume and hydrophilicity, CS can be used to inhibit unwanted interactions with plasma proteins and cells during circulation in the body of nanoparticle systems. In addition, CS has been used in the development of nanocarriers to improve targeted drug delivery for cancer and inflammatory diseases due to its interaction with the CD44 receptor or to achieve an intracellular targeting of drugs [15].
Cellulose derivatives are other polymers commonly used for nanoparticle production. A natural source of cellulose inserted in the Novel Food list is the sugar bagasse fiber. Sugarcane bagasse is the dry pulpy residue left after the extraction of juice from sugarcane. In light of a circular economy, the recovery of fibers from this waste is increasing. Sugarcane bagasse is mainly composed of cellulose and hemicellulose, which represent 70–75% and 20–25% of its mass, respectively, in accordance with the EU Directive No. 2015/2283. Recently, derivatives of these polysaccharides were proposed. As an example, Kumar H. et al. developed copper oxide nanocomposite (CuO-NP) hydrogels based on lab-made carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from sugarcane bagasse. CMC is a class of hydrophilic polymers, which, in contrast to cellulose, are easily resolved in water and have a perfect swelling strength. These CuO-NPs demonstrated a greater antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria compared to synthetic CMC purchased from the market. This evidence indicates that the hydrogels developed from sugarcane bagasse have a great potential application in various medical areas, for instance, in drug delivery and wound healing [48].
Fucoidan (FUC), a marine polysaccharide derived from the cell wall of marine algae, is considered a highly promising polymer for pharmaceutical research and the creation of an innovative drug delivery system [24]. FUC is a non-toxic, biodegradable, and biocompatible polymer that has received approval from the U.S. FDA as a food ingredient, specifically categorized as “Generally Recognized as Safe.” Fucoidan possesses a range of beneficial properties, including its role as an emulsifier and viscosity enhancer. The primary sources of FUC are marine brown algae, including members of the Phaeophyta, Laminariaceae, Fucaceae, Chordariaceae, and Alariaceae families [26], as well as sea cucumbers and sea urchin eggs, and some seagrasses (e.g., Cymodoceaceae) [65]. The marine polysaccharide FUC exhibits unique structural and chemical characteristics due to the presence of the -OSO3H group, which imparts strong acidic properties to it. This feature makes the FUC capable of forming polyelectrolyte complexes (PECs) with different polycations, of different natures, for the development of safe and effective delivery systems. Among these, modified (prolonged, controlled, and targeted) drug release systems, such as polyelectrolyte particles, core–shell NPs, multilayer NPs, and self-assembling polymer structures with stable and reproducible properties from FUC, have been recently reviewed [24].
Phytoglycogen (PG) is a highly branched polymer of glucose (a type of starch-like carbohydrate) which is produced as soft, compact nanoparticles. Indeed, when PG is introduced into water, it assumes the form of monodisperse, low-viscosity, and extensively hydrated colloidal particles with nanosized dimensions ranging from 30 to 110 nanometers [66]. The primary origin of PG can be traced to the sugary-1 mutant variant of maize kernels, which is a prominent genetic makeup of sweet corn. However, PG has also been detected in various other widespread plant species, such as sorghum and rice. The Novel Food Directive No. 2017/2470 allows the extraction of PG from non-genetic modified sweet corn via conventional food processing techniques. The distinctive attributes of PG, including its dendrimeric arrangement, as well as its non-toxicity and biodegradability, render phytoglycogen nanoparticles exceptionally suitable for applications in the pharmaceutical, cosmeceutical, or nutraceutical areas. Indeed, owing to its remarkable characteristics related to dispersibility, structure, and morphology, PG has been recently used in its native form or after undergoing chemical modifications in the form of nanoparticles to enhance the solubility of bioactive compounds that are poorly soluble in water [32,33]. Thanks to the high concentration of hydroxyl groups on the surface of PG nanoparticles, they are well suited for a wide array of chemical alterations [34].
Yuhao Chen et al. studied the molecular interactions between modified PG nanoparticles, i.e., carboxymethyl phytoglycogen (CMPG) and casein (NaCas) nanoparticles under different complexation conditions. Their interaction was studied to obtain a polyelectrolyte nanocomplex via an electrostatic interaction for the encapsulation and delivery of curcumin, employed as a hydrophobic bioactive compound model. Electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonding were the driving forces that enabled a nanocomplex to be obtained, where the hydrophobic interactions had a restricted influence. A nanocomplex, approximately 65 nm in size with a PDI of 0.2, was achieved through fine-tuned preparation parameters. It was conjectured that the heating process significantly contributed to the nanocomplex formation by promoting partial aggregation of NaCas, yet it had an adverse impact on curcumin’s encapsulation efficiency, reducing it by approximately 40%. This outcome indicated the need to explore alternative chemical modifications of native PG for the creation of nanocomplexes with improved encapsulation and delivery capabilities [35]. Octenyl succinic anhydride (OSA) was employed as a modifier, and it is a widely used food-grade starch modification to achieve emulsification and encapsulation in various food and non-food applications [37]. Simmons and co-workers studied how the chemical substitution of the hydroxyl groups of PG with OSA influenced the nanoparticle shape and surface. The detailed analysis with small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) demonstrated that the degree of the substitution of PG nanoparticles with OSA has a central role in particle structure. Specifically, this study has provided evidence that native PG nanoparticles with a core of radius 210 Å (21 nm) are decorated by hairy chains, and by increasing the degree of substitution the hair chains collapse to form more compact particles with small seeds on the surface. This information has important implications for understanding how chemical modifications influence the physical properties of PG nanoparticles, which might be suitable for a wide variety of scientific and industrial applications [32]. By examining the interactions of PG nanoparticles with several representative proteins, Yingshan Ma et al. found that bovine serum albumin (BSA), analogous to the most abundant protein in human plasma, adsorbs to PG via hydrogen bonding. Under ambient conditions, the BSA layer originally endowed electroneutral PG nanoparticles with additional ligand-binding capabilities, enabling the interactions with and the further attachment of active pharmaceutical ingredients. In particular, they showed the attachment of methotrexate (MTX) to PG nanoparticles and BSA nanoconjugates [36].
Finally, several charged polysaccharides were proposed as gene delivery vectors for tumor immune-targeted therapy loaded with bioactive compounds for the production of multifunctional nanoparticles. β-glucans isolated from yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and polysaccharides from Panax notoginseng are examples included in the Novel Food list [31,52,53].
The preparation methods of polymer nanodeliveries are very different depending on the nature of the starting polymer. In the case of polysaccharides, ionic gelation methods are the most used [10,11,14], while electrospinning is used frequently for the preparation of nanofibers [12,13]. On the other hand, naturally occurring nanoparticles, such as PC nanoparticles, are extracted from vegetable sources [32,34].

2.2. Lipid-Based Nanoparticles

Lipid-based nanoparticles are a class of nanocarriers composed of lipids with different characteristics depending on the purpose and the active ingredient to be transported. Among this class, the most used delivery systems are liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), and nanostructured lipid nanoparticles (NLCs).
Liposomes are vesical nanoparticles able to load both hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds. Their spherical 3D structure is composed of an internal aqueous core surrounded by phospholipid bilayers usually stabilized by cholesterol. The use of phytosterols in the place of cholesterol for stabilizing liposome membranes is widely investigated to avoid its negative effects, such as the increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Phytosterols are naturally occurring lipids extracted from natural sources (such as rice, vegetable oils, and soybeans) included in the Novel Food list. They are expected to exhibit the same unique features of cholesterol due to their close chemical structure.
A comparison was made by Jovanovic et al., where liposomes with cholesterol and β-sitosterol were prepared and characterized. The use of phytosterol allowed smaller liposomes to be obtained with an increased surface charge and a higher stability of the system compared to liposomes with cholesterol [39].
As mentioned previously, phospholipids are the main component of liposomes and their origin can differ (e.g., soybean, egg yolk, or milk). In the field of Novel Food, egg yolk and chia seed lipids are the principal sources. Also, phosphatidylserine isolated from soya and fish phospholipids are included. Many articles in the literature reported the use of phospholipids from egg yolks to formulate liposomes [40,41,42]. The various composition and origin of egg yolk extract allows us to obtain liposomes with different characteristics and properties in terms of stability, permeability, and morphology [42,67,68].
Meanwhile, Kuznetcova et al. decided to use a phospholipid-rich solid fraction of chia seed lipids to prepare nanoliposomes. They obtained carriers of about 120 nm with a negative surface charge [11].
Considering the limitation of liposomes, both in the technological field and in the oral administration route, the addition of excipients capable of protecting them from freeze drying and the extreme environment of the gastrointestinal tract have to be taken into consideration. Chen et al., in order to deliver bioflavonoids via the oral route, evaluated the use of isomalto-oligosaccharide (IMO) to cover liposomes and protect them from aggregation or hydrolytic degradation. Indeed, IMO allowed them to obtain a liposome of around 250 nm without changing before and after freeze drying. Moreover, the good values of oral bioavailability of bioflavonoids underline the ability of IMO to protect the system from enzymatic and acidic damage [69]. Other excipients listed in the Novel Food Directive No. 2017/2470 are the disaccharides trehalose and cellobiose, well-known cryoprotectants used for preventing the collapse of the vesicles during the freeze drying process.
A different approach used by Wu et al. was the use of chitosan from A. bisporus, a wild mushroom from China, to coat liposomes to increase their permanence in the gastrointestinal tract and facilitate mucous penetration. In their study, the authors reported the ability of chitosan from the fungal source to create a corona around liposome with a lower size than commercial chitosan. The stability and the encapsulation efficiency capacity were not impaired by the origin of chitosan [13].
Overall liposomes from compounds derived from Novel Foods originate from the hydration of thin lipid films or lipid cakes, causing them to expand. During agitation, the hydrated lipid sheets detach and naturally reseal themselves, leading to the creation of large liposomes that necessitate the input of energy, typically in the form of sonic energy (sonication) or mechanical energy (extrusion) for reducing size [39,40,41,42,67,68].
In recent years, as well as liposomes, SLNs have been often used for the transport of nucleic acids, such as small-interfering RNAs or messenger RNAs. In this context, the endosomal escape and further release of RNA in the cytosol, after cellular uptake, is the critical point for a successful delivery. The use of ionizable lipids that perturb the endosome can help the escape; however, recent studies have shown that the addition of cholesterol on the NP surface can improve membrane fusion. This capability is conferred by the steroidal structure of cholesterol. Patel et al. created a collection of SLNs by using a microfluidic preparation technique with different phytosterols to test their activity in gene delivery. β-sitosterol appears to be the more promising phytosterol in terms of transfection and modification of SLN morphology, which allows for a more fragile structure by promoting fusion with the endosomal membrane [38].
The second generation of SLNs is represented by the NLCs that are composed of incompatible solid and liquid lipids. The irregular matrix improves the loading of lipophilic active ingredients and the long-term colloidal stability compared to SLNs. Overall, NLCs were investigated in depth for the oral and topic delivery of lipophilic compounds. For the production of NLCs, the Novel Food Schizochytrium oil was recently proposed. Schizochytrium sp. is a type of microalgae (diatoms) able to store lipids into a droplet. This particular diatom produces an oil that contains polyunsaturated fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid.

2.3. Extracellular Vesicles

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid membranes in a nanosized range that can be produced by different cell types. In order to promote the use of sustainable material, the natural metabolites of microalgae, such as nanoalgosomes, a type of EVs secreted with high yields by microalgae, isolated by a tangential flow filtration technique, have been proposed as a new delivery system. The marine chlorophyte Tetraselmis chuii and its metabolites are intended as Novel Food [51]. Picciotto et al. [50] and Adamo et al. [51] worked with this type of microalgae to obtain and characterize the nanoalgosomes from the cultivation medium. These research groups have developed a method to separate the nanoalgosomes from the culture medium, thus obtaining EVs with a size of about 100 nm. Tests on cell lines and on C. elegans, as an invertebrate model, demonstrated the ability of these EVs to be internalized using epithelial and intestinal cells with the future possibility of being used as natural, sustainable, and ethically accepted delivery systems.

2.4. Nanoemulsion Systems

The emulsions are a mixture composed of two different phases that are normally immiscible. With the addition of surfactants or particular techniques, a delivery system can be produced. In particular, nanoemulsion is a colloidal suspension that contains oil and surfactants to obtain a stable formulation and is transparent in appearance with a droplet size less than 200 nm, which is usually obtained using a high-speed disperser.
Different types of oils can be used for the production of nanoemulsion systems. Concerning the Novel Food list, chia seeds contain the highest amount of ɑ-linolenic acid (ALA), an essential fatty acid precursor of omega-3 and phospholipids. The use of ALA for the preparation of a nanoemulsion was investigated by Kuznetcova et al., who obtained a stable formulation of about 100 nm with a negative surface charge [11]. Moreover, sacha inchi oil was exploited by Echeverri et al. to prepare a nanoemulsion with good stability over time, unlike the coarse emulsion [46].
To solve the stability problem, a Pickering emulsion was studied in recent years. This type of emulsion is characterized by the presence of solid particles typically made of silica or clay, even if the use of natural biopolymers can represent an innovative application of Novel Food in this field.
Proteins from potatoes, rich in different amino acids and modified with chitosan, were studied as a new surfactant to improve the stability and antioxidant properties of this emulsion. Hu and Zhang used this combination of compounds to obtain an emulsion with a size of less than 1.5 μm that was stable for up to 28 days in different storage conditions [70].
Another study used chitosan to cover the phytoglycogen surface to obtain an amphiphilic mixture usable to stabilize a Pickering emulsion containing β-carotene. This emulsion with a size of about 22 μm was stable for 6 months and was able to load and protect β-carotene from light and temperature [33].

2.5. Protein-Based Nanoparticles

Proteins or peptides are bioactive molecules that are gaining importance in the drug delivery field. As a matter of fact, they are attractive alternatives to synthetic polymers. Protein nanoparticles can be obtained with chemical (emulsion or complex coacervation), physical (spray drying), or self-assembly methods [71]. The advantages of using these biomacromolecules in nanoparticle formulations rely on their high safety, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. Moreover, the amphiphilic properties make the protein highly water-soluble. Therefore, the production of protein nanoparticles does not require the employment of any toxic chemical or organic solvents.
Proteins can be extracted from animal or plant sources. Those extracted from plants are gaining interest for their low allergenicity and sustainability, and are being extracted from agri-food wastes in most cases [72].
Coagulated potato, rapeseed, and mung bean proteins are listed in the Novel Food Directive No. 2017/2470. These natural peptides facilitate the endosomal escape and the release of the active compound in the cytosol, and were thus proposed as excipients for formulating nanoparticles suitable for a magnitude of applications [45].
Edelman et al. used potato proteins to load astaxanthin, a carotenoid, obtaining a particle with a size less than 400 nm for oral administration [17]. Other authors, after rapeseed extraction, used the protein to encapsulate β-carotene or, after cathepsin-B hydrolyzation, to obtain peptides for encapsulating doxorubicin [18]. These nanoparticles were obtained due to the self-assembling features of the protein.
Conversely, mung bean proteins have been exploited as an excipient for the coacervation process in combination with polysaccharides. A coacervate system consists of two polyelectrolyte molecules (e.g., protein and polysaccharide) with opposite charges capable of creating an electrostatic interaction. Mung bean protein was observed to be rich in basic amino acids, such as arginine and histidine, that can interact with negatively charged carboxylic groups present in polysaccharides [73]. Meiguni et al. extracted this protein from mung beans with a yield of 82%, and, after an optimization process, they obtained coacervates with succinylated chitosan able to embed curcumin with an encapsulation efficiency of about 90% and good protection from light [30]. The protection of the cargo from light makes these particles suitable for the loading of several light-sensitive bioactive compounds, such as carotenoids. Mung bean proteins were also exploited by Koralegedara and co-workers. Taking advantage of the cationic feature of the proteins, the authors studied the formation of coacervate using different legume proteins, among which were mung bean proteins and carrageenans. The obtained system had a size of around 130 nm with a negative surface charge and was stable in the pH range of 4.0–7.0, resulting in a promising vehicle for the transport of active molecules [29].
From the Fabaceae family, alfalfa or lucerne (Medicago sativa) leaves were proposed as a new source of proteins for the production of protein-based nanoparticles. These proteins have demonstrated good emulsifying, gelling, and film-forming features [74]. Hadidi et al. developed nanosized protein particles via nano-precipitation for loading hemp essential oil, a by-product of Cannabis sativa processes. The authors proved that alfalfa proteins are a promising tool capable of stabilizing, thermally protecting, and increasing the antioxidant activity of the essential oil [28].
Finally, in January 2023, pea and rice protein fermented by Lentinula edodes mycelia were included in the Novel Food list. These proteins might represent novel sources of proteins with similar chemical features.
Concerning animal sources, eggshell membranes (ESMs) are naturally occurring protein-based thin layers with a thickness of ca. 50–70 μm found between the albumen and shell of eggs which protect against bacterial infections [61]. Although the ESM is classified as a waste of pasteurized liquid in the egg industry, ESMs exhibit microstructural architectures of entangled microfibers rich in 80–85% proteins; 10% collagen (collagen types I, V, and X); and 70–75% keratin, glycoproteins, fibrillin, and proteoglycans [15]. The Novel Food Directive No. 2017/2470 includes the hydrolysate of egg membranes produced with hydro-mechanical separation to obtain egg membranes that undergo a patented solubilization. Several studies report its successful application as a component of biocompatible delivery systems highlighting the therapeutic potential of nanosystems based on EMSs [14,16]. Other important sources of proteins are edible insects. Four edible insects have been approved as Novel Foods so far: Tenebrio molitor (mealworm), Locusta migratoria (migratory locust), Acheta domesticus (house cricket), and the larva from Alphitobius diaperinus (lesser mealworm). Notwithstanding the low acceptance of the Western countries of these food matrices, edible insects are gaining attraction as a potential inexhaustible source of edible proteins. Indeed, the farming of edible insects is fast and environmentally friendly. The high water solubility and the strong negative charge of these proteins make them suitable for coacervate production with positively charged polysaccharides. Okagu et al. used non-cuticular protein from Tenebrio molitor along with chitosan for loading curcumin [49]. Finally, the successful delivery of curcumin [45] was achieved by using phytoglycogen in combination with casein, a milk protein, following a carboxymethylation step for obtaining polyelectrolyte complexes of 50/100 nm [35].

3. Compound Derived from Novel Foods Embedded into Nanocarriers

The European list of Novel Foods in Regulation No. 2017/2470 covers foods traditionally used in non-EU countries as nutritional or medical sources, new substances to be used in foods, food from new sources, as well as new ways and technologies for producing food.
Consequently, numerous Novel Foods listed in the Directive are well-known substances commonly employed in the food industry but obtained via a new industrial process, for which applicants requested authorization because it was more convenient or eco-friendly, such as the processes from agri-food wastes. The European Commission authorizes the use of a Novel Food at the moment in which its consumption is not nutritionally disadvantageous. As an example, the stilbene resveratrol extracted from Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica) has been largely used in food supplements before 1997. The trans isomer of resveratrol obtained from microbial sources or via synthetic processes is considered a Novel Food. Also, epigallocatechin-3-gallate can be found in the Novel Food list as a purified extract from green tea (Camellia sinensis) leaves, even though other green tea extracts have been used prior to 1997. Nanotechnology can be considered an important platform for favoring and increasing the beneficial effects of bioactive compounds.
Table 2 summarizes an almost exhaustive list of Novel Foods reported in Directive No. 2017/2470 and embedded for different purposes in nanodelivery systems, highlighting the most important outcomes and advantages of the “nano” strategy application. Since the Novel Foods produced via non-traditional methods exhibit the same nutritional and beneficial features as the traditional ones, studies developed using traditional sources were thoroughly assessed.
Starting from resveratrol and epigallocatechin-3-gallate, their effects on health might be impaired by their low bioavailability or high instability in the physiological environment. The encapsulation of resveratrol and epigallocatechin-3-gallate via different nanocarriers was investigated in depth to increase their beneficial activity, such as their antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-aging effects, as recently reviewed by Bohara et al. and Sahadevan et al., respectively [75,76].
The same beneficial activities were also reported for other phytochemicals belonging to phenolic acid, flavonoid, lignan, stilbene, alkaloid, and anthraquinone classes; however, the bioavailability of phytochemicals is quite low after oral intake. Indeed, these bioactive compounds are easily metabolized at the intestinal level by digestive enzymes and microbiota and are degraded because of the low-pH stomach environment [77]. From the Plantae kingdom, taxifolin-rich extract from Dahurian Larch (Larix gmelinii) wood, Magnolia officinalis bark, Korean angelica (Angelica gigas) roots, noni or beach mulberry (Morinda citrifolia), and blue honeysuckle (Lonicera caerulea) fruits were proposed as new sources of nutraceuticals in Europe by the Novel Food Directive No. 2017/2470. These plants were exploited for centuries in traditional medicine because of the beneficial properties of their phytochemicals (taxifolin, magnolol, pyranocoumarins, anthraquinones, and anthocyanins, respectively), and innovative delivery strategies were recently proposed to enhance their antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-cancer activities [78,79,80]. Differently, Echinacea angustifolia root and cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) fruit extracts have been widely employed as supportive treatments (in dietary supplements) for the prevention of respiratory and urinary tract infections, respectively. These supplements have been authorized even if extracted via innovative methods on the basis of the Novel Food regulation. Recently, the encapsulation of whole extracts in liposomes, niosomes, or polymeric nanoparticles was proposed to accentuate their activities.
Another noteworthy class of plant-derived nutraceuticals is represented by phytosterols. As mentioned before, phytosterols display a similar chemical structure to cholesterol. This feature confers to the lipid-lowering effects of phytosterols. On the other hand, the steroidal structure impairs their bioavailability and bioactivity. The same Achilles heel has been noticed for carotenoids and liposoluble vitamins together with a marked photo instability. The poor water solubility and chemical degradation have been easily counteracted by several nanodelivery strategies. The carotenoids lycopene and zeaxanthin are inserted in the food additive list (E160 and E161h) and have been authorized in food supplements for decades for their antioxidant properties. The European Commission allowed the employment of these nutraceuticals obtained via synthetic or microbial processes. Additionally, the production of lycopene via extraction from foods (tomato peel and oleogum resin, and red guava) and mold (Blakeslea trispora) was also granted.
From the kingdom Fungi, the authorization of Antrodia cinnamomea as a novel active ingredient in food supplements should be mentioned. Antrodia cinnamomea was exploited in the traditional medicine of Eastern Asia countries because of the high content of triterpenoid with strong anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective effects. Kong et al. and Menon et al. proposed polymeric nanoparticles and cyclodextrin inclusion complexes to increase the bioavailability of the hydrophobic nutraceuticals.
From the kingdom Animalia, eggshell membrane proteins, Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) oil, and bovine lactoferrin are cited in the Novel Food list as new sources of foods. The eggshell membrane proteins display an important biological activity in addition to interesting delivery properties. Mucoadhesive polymeric nanoparticles were demonstrated to increase the local delivery of eggshell membrane proteins, emphasizing their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and simultaneously preventing their intestinal degradation. Antarctic krill is rich in omega-3 fatty acids (docosahexaenoic and eicosapentaenoic acids) and the carotenoid astaxanthin. These nutraceuticals are active in reducing blood lipid and sugar levels, and their encapsulation in lipid-based nanocarriers demonstrated an ability to efficaciously protect them from light and thermal oxidation. Additionally, astaxanthin is obtained from Haematococcus pluvialis algae, which is the most important source of this carotenoid authorized by the Novel Food Directive No. 2017/2470. Abdol Wahab and co-workers recently reported the state of the art in the oral delivery of this carotenoid [81]. Bovine lactoferrin is a protein that naturally occurs in cow’s milk with numerous beneficial activities, such as antimicrobial, anti-cancer, and anti-inflammatory effects [82]. These beneficial properties can be enhanced with nanodelivery carriers capable of enhancing bovine lactoferrin permeability and bioavailability.
Finally, iron hydroxide adipate tartrate (IHAT) is the sole engineered colloidal material reported in the Novel Food list. IHAT is a nutritional source of iron used in food supplements for treating iron deficiencies, such as anemia. In IHAT, the iron oxo-hydroxide is embedded into a corona of tartrate. The dispersion is aided with adipic and tartaric acids. The engineered material in powder form is insoluble in the gastrointestinal tract; however, it is efficiently internalized using enterocytes as whole nanoparticles with endocytosis.
Table 2. Novel Food-derived nutraceuticals embedded into nanoparticles for oral delivery.
Table 2. Novel Food-derived nutraceuticals embedded into nanoparticles for oral delivery.
Novel FoodNutraceutical CompoundsActivityType of NanoparticleResultsReference
Angelica gigas Nakai (AGN) dried rootPyranocoumarins (e.g., decursin and decursinol angelate)AntioxidantHPMC as biopolymer + acetic acid as plasticizer for final solid formulationBetter extraction of phenolic compounds and flavonoids from AGN using HPMC and plasticizer[83]
Astaxanthin-rich oleoresin from Haematococcus pluvialis algaeAstaxanthinAntioxidant, anti-cancer, and
cardiovascular disease prevention agent
Nanoemulsions, liposomes, SLNs, chitosan-based and PLGA-based nanoparticlesImproved bioavailability[81]
Antarctic krill oil from Euphausia SuperbaOmega-3 fatty acids (mainly docosahexaenoic and eicosapentaenoic acids) and astaxanthinReduces blood lipid, sugar levels, and the risk of atherosclerosis, slows down nerve aging, relieves the symptoms of depression, and anti-inflammatory NLCProtection of polyunsaturated fatty acids from oxidation, light, and temperature [84]
Antrodia camphorata (or cinnamonea)TriterpenoidsAnti-diabeticSilica/chitosan Demonstrate anti-diabetic properties on rat model and protection of testicular dysfunction[85]
Bovine lactoferrinBovine lactoferrinAnti-viral against SARS-CoV-2Phosphatidil coline liposomeReduction of the infection of about 80% on the lung cell line, and a higher anti-viral effect than non-liposomal lactoferrin. Protection from gastrointestinal conditions after oral administration[86]
Cranberry extract powder from Vaccinium macrocarponPolyphenols (mainly proanthocyanidins)AntioxidantLiposomes containing bile salt in the double layer to inhibit enzymes in the gastrointestinal tractProtection of the liver by the reduction of the level of antioxidant enzymes [87]
Antimicrobial Nanoemulsion with green tea catechinsSynergic effect against E. coli for urinary infection treatment[88]
AntioxidantChitosan/carrageenan NPs Prevention of their degradation in the digestive medium[89]
Antimicrobial Chitosan NPs Interaction with bacteria reducing adherence to intestinal tissue[90]
Echinacea angustifolia extract from cell culturesEchinacoside and polyphenolsAntimicrobial Alginate/chitosan nanoparticlesThe encapsulated extract displayed a higher biofilm inhibition and up to a 32-fold lower MIC compared to the free extract against Staphylococcus aureus[91]
NiosomeThe encapsulated extract showed up to a 16-fold greater antibacterial activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae compared to the free extract[92]
Egg membrane hydrolysate proteinsCollagen, elastin, glycosaminoglycansAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory against IL-8 in intestinal epithelial cellspH sensitive chitosan/fucoidan NPsProtection from intestinal degradation, increased antioxidant activity, and mucoadhesion that increase local delivery[22]
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate as a purified extract from green tea leaves (Camellia sinensis)Epigallocatechin-3-gallateAntioxidant, anti-inflammatoryChitosan-based NPs Controlled release in the intestinal environment and intestinal protection of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (preserved antioxidant activity)[93]
Iron hydroxide adipate tartrate Iron deficiency such as anemiaNPs of iron hydroxide adipate tartrate is insoluble in GI tractSlowly ferrous iron release avoiding ROS production[94,95,96]
Lonicera caerulea berriesAnthocyaninsAntioxidant and antimicrobialPLGA and carboxymethyl chitosan NPs
Improved therapeutic efficiency [80]
Lycopene (LYC) produced with a synthetic process or extracted from
Blakeslea trispora (red guava),
tomato peels, or
oleoresin from tomatoes
-AntioxidantPolyelectrolyte complexes with sodium caseinate and TLH-3, an acidic polysaccharideProtection from oxidation and controlled release in the gastrointestinal tract[97]
- Antioxidant, anti-inflammatoryLiposome with lecithin and cholesterolIncreased level of LYC in serum and brain compared with free LYC. Reduction in ROS and inflammation[98]
Antioxidant, anti-tumoral (prostate cancer)Self-emulsifying system with coconut oil and sorbitan monostearate Confirm the antioxidant activity without side effects. Ability to reach prostate tissue[99]
- Antioxidant for liver diseaseChitosan-based NPsHepatoprotection with reduction in IL and TNF-alpha[100]
-AntioxidantCatechin NPs coated with chitosanGastric protection and higher plasma concentration [101]
-Antioxidant, anti-tumoral (breast cancer)Whey protein isolate NPsHigh plasma concentration after oral administration[102]
Magnolia bark extract (Magnolia officinalis)Magnolol and honokyolAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, antidepressant, and for the treatment of ulcers Mixed micelles and nanosuspensionsIncreased permeation of magnolol in Caco-2 cell lines and in vivo gastrointestinal absorption [103]
Amorphous solid dispersion using HPMC acetate succinate Increased bioavailability with antioxidant activity and gut protection[104]
Protein NPs into chitosan/alginate hydrogel MPs Release in the colon; uptake and anti-inflammatory effect on epithelial and macrophage colon cells[105]
Micelles with Pluronic F127 and L61 or with copolymers (Soluplus, Solutol, and D-alpha-toco-pheryl PEG 1000 succinate)pH-dependent release in the intestine; bioavailability 3-fold greater than raw product[106,107]
Noni fruit juice
Noni fruit juice powder
Noni fruit puree and concentrate (Morinda citrifolia)
Anthraquinones (damnacanthal) and polyphenolsAnti-cancerPLGA-PEG nanocapsulesHigher activity in cell growth inhibition, compared to non-encapsulated damnacanthalReviewed by [79]
Phytosterols/phytostanols Anti-cancerSLNs loading several phytosterols using different glycerides Increased solubility (bioavailability) and better hypocaloric properties[108]
Anti-cancer (breast cancer)Chitosan/alginate NP functionalized with folate for breast cancer-targeting delivering β-sitosterolProtection to enzymes and hydrolysis; prolonged release; good permeation across intestinal cells; and high toxicity against cancer cells[109,110]
LDL cholesterol- lowering propertiesNanoporous starch aerogel impregnated with phytosterol from soybeansIncreased bioavailability from 3 to 35%; reduction of crystallinity[111,112]
Cholesterol-lowering propertiesSoy protein vehicles delivering several phytosterolsReduction of cholesterol level and better bioavailability[113]
-Cholesterol-lowering propertiesSodium caseinate/pectin coacervateProtection in the gastrointestinal tract; hydrophobic bond sodium caseinate reduce crystallinity and increase bioaccessibility after digestion[114]
Cholesterol-lowering propertiesSoybean protein/pectin coacervate delivering stigmasterolsStability at different pH values with an increased stability to the stomach environment; release in intestinal fluids[115]
Cholesterol-lowering propertiesZein/pectin coacervate delivering stigmasterolsPectin creates a gel around zein/phytosterol[116]
Taxifolin-rich extract from the wood of Dahurian Larch (Larix gmelinii)TaxifolinAntioxidantMicelles, liposomes, polymeric NPs, and hybrid systemsImproved stability, permeability, and systemic availability of quercitin, a taxifolin analogueReviewed by [117]
Trans-resveratrol produced with a synthetic process Antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-agingSLNs, liposomes, dendrimers, polymeric NPsIncreased bioavailability and permeability. Increased concentration in the brain compared to free resveratrol Reviewed by [75]
Vitamin K2 (menaquinone) produced with a synthetic or microbiological process-Fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies in pancreatic-insufficient CF patientsLiposomes containing a blend of vitamins + vit. K2Increased level of other vitamins in plasma in comparison with the same supplements without vitamin K2 (trial in cystic fibrosis patients)[118]
-Bone support, promotes heart health and helps boost immunityLiposomes loaded with vit. D3/K2 and coated with chitosan with mucoadhesive- propertiesHigh encapsulation and controlled release in situ [119]
Zeaxanthin produced with synthesis ZeaxanthinAntioxidant,
cardiovascular disease prevention agent
Liposomes, nanoemulsions, polymeric NPs, and polymer–lipid hybrid NPsIncreased bioavailability and stability of lutein, the isomer of zeaxanthinReviewed by [120]

4. Nanoceutical Application in the Food Sector: Safety Issues and Regulations

Nanocarriers loaded with bioactive compounds or produced using materials derived from foods for influencing human health or condition can find application in different fields, such as pharmaceutical, health, cosmetic, and food. In this latter case, nanoceuticals can be designed for fortifying foods or obtaining dietary supplements to increase the total nutrient profile of a diet. Besides the advantages and benefits, the employment of nanoparticles has raised concerns regarding the safety of their intake, which has not been fully elucidated. Even though a material is considered safe, its physiochemical properties at a nanoscale are completely different. The oral intake of nanoparticles might alter the normal functions of the gastrointestinal tract [121] and gut microbiota [122] or increase the risk of accumulation within tissues and cells depending on their dimensions, shape, and surface charge, as discussed in depth by other authors [123,124,125]. Moreover, nanotechnology can enhance the oral bioavailability of hydrophobic bioactive compounds causing adverse consequences or health problems in some cases [124].
The first advantage of using Novel Foods as materials for obtaining ingredients for the production of nanoceuticals or bioactive compounds is related to the reuse of agri-food wastes. In March 2020, the European Commission adopted the “new circular economy action plan” within the “European green deal” for more sustainable growth. Thus, the recovery of compounds from waste (e.g., lycopene from tomato peel or eggshell membrane proteins) is fundamental for achieving the goal set out by the European Union. Another advantage can be represented by the employment of new sustainable sources in light of the dramatic foreseen scenario alerted by the Food and Agriculture Organization, as mentioned in the introduction. The exploitation of algae, microorganisms, or insects are a few examples [126].
In Europe, the application of nanotechnology in food products (e.g., food supplements and fortified foods) is regulated by Directive No. 2015/2283 concerning Novel Foods, which reports that ‘engineered nanomaterial’ refers to “any intentionally produced material that has one or more dimensions of the order of 100 nm or less or that is composed of discrete functional parts, either internally or at the surface, many of which have one or more dimensions of the order of 100 nm or less, including structures, agglomerates or aggregates, which may have a size above the order of 100 nm but retain properties that are characteristic of the nanoscale”. When the definition of a nanomaterial is fulfilled, the authorization process described above is no longer sufficient. Indeed, in this case, EFSA authorization is granted only after a careful evaluation of toxicological hazards that might require in vitro and in vivo studies.
EFSA has recently drafted two guides on the risk assessment of nanomaterials that outline (i) the technical requirements for establishing the presence of small particles and (ii) the scientific risk assessment and the necessary testing for evaluating the safety to protect consumers [127,128]. The regulatory safety assessment of nanoparticles in foods has been recently discussed in depth by Schoonjans and co-workers [129].
Briefly, the EFSA Scientific Committee had considered scientific studies that provide a relevant understanding of hazard characterization, exposure assessment, and physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials. The first step for the risk assessment is the physico-chemical characterization of the material. In particular, particle size is the most important feature. As a matter of fact, the scientific literature underlined that particles up to 250 nm have a high chance of translocation from the gastrointestinal tract to the tissues. Thus, the Scientific Committee established that particles with a size equal to or larger than 500 nm with less than 10% of particles with a smaller size (number-based particles) are not engineered nanomaterials and can be approved with a conventional risk assessment. If these particles are composed of ingredients present in the lists of Novel Foods (Regulation (EC) No. 2015/2283), substances for the fortification of foods (Regulation (EC) No. 1925/2006), foods for specific groups (Regulation (EU) No. 609/2013), or food additives (Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008), they are considered as safe and can be used without any risk assessments. On the contrary, particles with a dimension equal to or smaller than 500 nm with more than 10% of particles with a smaller size need a nano-specific risk assessment. The Scientific Committee selected electron microscopy as the recommended technique for size screening. If the electron microscopy measurement is not feasible, other methods are indicated (e.g., scattering techniques). The data have to be presented as a number size distribution and are estimated through Feret’s diameter. Feret’s diameter is a commonly used measure in microscopy that considers both the maximum and the minimum diameter of an irregularly shaped particle. Small particles are not considered ‘engineered nanomaterials’ when they lose their particulate nature due to physical, chemical, or biological processes, or solubilization in the gastrointestinal tract, because their risk is expected to be similar to the conventional bulk material.
According to EFSA guidelines, if the material displays nanomaterial features after physico-chemical characterization, the second step of the nano-specific risk assessment involves in vitro digestion by reviewing the existing information or generating new data, including genotoxicity and cell toxicity. Subsequently, if the material is persistent or there are indications of toxicity, step 3 comprises in vivo testing for determining pharmacokinetic profiles and the histopathology of gastrointestinal sites and organs [127,128].
Definitely, many researchers have pointed out the complementary activation, cytokine release, and other immunological and hematological reactions, of the nanoparticles, leading to compromised safety and efficacy. According to a recent review, the activation of the immune system, which carries inflammatory reactions, is almost exclusively induced by inorganic nanoparticles, mainly carbon-based or metal-based nanoparticles, particularly containing titanium dioxide, gold, silica, and graphene oxide–based nanomaterials [130]. It is clear that the nature of the lipids and polymers of the organic nanoparticles strongly affects their safety profile. It is widely accepted that biodegradable and biocompatible natural organic compounds (principally polysaccharides and proteins) that are Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) have become attractive players for the development of safe and powerful nanoparticles based on natural constituents [131,132].

5. Conclusions

Nanosized delivery systems represent an emerging sector in health, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and food areas with great potential, progressing fast and using a variety of materials, coatings, and functions. The aim of this paper was to provide a comprehensive review of the literature, which combines the nanodelivery systems and phytoconstituents derived from Novel Foods, but is also evidenced as Novel Food and could represent an innovative source of materials for the formulation of nanodelivery systems. The goals of the reviewed studies principally comprised increased solubility, higher stability, and improved bioavailability of the loaded phytoconstituents.
Undoubtedly, nanoparticles naturally occur in food because numerous food and feed constituents consist of inherent proteins, carbohydrates, and fats, which span a range of sizes from large biopolymers (macromolecules) down to the nanoscale. The primary concern, however, revolves around whether synthetic nanoparticles and other nanomaterials may pose any potential risks. EFSA has recently produced guidelines, which can deeply help the development of robust, integrated, and acceptable testing methods; however, a harmonized and detailed approach is not yet available to assess their adequate safety profiles. Critical points are probably related to the biodegradation of the nanocarriers and their biocompatibility—mainly related to their nature (GRAS nanosystems) and their production—which should avoid the use of hazardous chemical reagents and also create systems (nanovectors) mimicking natural exosomes, which cannot be recognized by our body as harmful vectors that induce immunological reactions or other adverse events.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.T., E.M. and E.L.; software, E.M., E.T. and G.V.; validation, D.B., G.V. and A.R.B.; investigation of references, E.T., E.M. and E.L.; writing—original draft preparation, E.T., E.L. and E.M.; writing—review and editing, D.B. and A.R.B.; supervision, E.T., E.M. and E.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Population Prospects 2022—Summary of Results; Department of Economic and Social Affairs: New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Food and Agriculture Organization. The Future of Food and Agriculture—Alternative Pathways to 2050; Summary Version; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. European Commission Union. List of Novel Foods; European Commission Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2017.
  4. Vapnek, J.; Purnhagen, K.; Hillel, B. Regulatory and Legislative Framework for Novel Foods. In Food Formulation: Novel Ingredients and Processing Techniques; Pathania, S., Brijesh, K.T., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; Volume 1, pp. 285–308. [Google Scholar]
  5. Vert, M.; Doi, Y.; Hellwich, K.-H.; Hess, M.; Hodge, P.; Kubisa, P.; Rinaudo, M.; Schué, F. Terminology for Biorelated Polymers and Applications (IUPAC Recommendations 2012). Pure Appl. Chem. 2012, 84, 377–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alfei, S.; Schito, A.M.; Zuccari, G. Nanotechnological Manipulation of Nutraceuticals and Phytochemicals for Healthy Purposes: Established Advantages vs. Still Undefined Risks. Polymers 2021, 13, 2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Elmowafy, M.; Shalaby, K.; Elkomy, M.H.; Alsaidan, O.A.; Gomaa, H.A.M.; Abdelgawad, M.A.; Mostafa, E.M. Polymeric Nanoparticles for Delivery of Natural Bioactive Agents: Recent Advances and Challenges. Polymers 2023, 15, 1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Meng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, N.; Qiao, H.; Zhu, M.; Meng, Q.; Lu, Q.; Zu, Y. Synthesis and Evaluation of a Novel Water-Soluble High Se-Enriched Astragalus Polysaccharide Nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 118, 1438–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pang, G.; Chen, C.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, T.; Yu, H.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, F.J.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, L.W. Bioactive Polysaccharide Nanoparticles Improve Radiation-Induced Abscopal Effect through Manipulation of Dendritic Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 42661–42670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Susa, F.; Bucca, G.; Limongi, T.; Cauda, V.; Pisano, R. Enhancing the Preservation of Liposomes: The Role of Cryoprotectants, Lipid Formulations and Freezing Approaches. Cryobiology 2021, 98, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kuznetcova, D.V.; Linder, M.; Jeandel, C.; Paris, C.; Desor, F.; Baranenko, D.A.; Nadtochii, L.A.; Arab-Tehrany, E.; Yen, F.T. Nanoliposomes and Nanoemulsions Based on Chia Seed Lipids: Preparation and Characterization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mane, S.; Pathan, E.; Tupe, S.; Deshmukh, S.; Kale, D.; Ghormade, V.; Chaudhari, B.; Deshpande, M. Isolation and Characterization of Chitosans from Different Fungi with Special Emphasis on Zygomycetous Dimorphic Fungus Benjaminiella poitrasii: Evaluation of Its Chitosan Nanoparticles for the Inhibition of Human Pathogenic Fungi. Biomacromolecules 2022, 23, 808–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, J.; Niu, Y.; Jiao, Y.; Chen, Q. Fungal Chitosan from Agaricus bisporus (Lange) Sing. Chaidam Increased the Stability and Antioxidant Activity of Liposomes Modified with Biosurfactants and Loading Betulinic Acid. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 123, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sharma, R.; Kuche, K.; Thakor, P.; Bhavana, V.; Srivastava, S.; Mehra, N.K.; Jain, S. Chondroitin Sulfate: Emerging Biomaterial for Biopharmaceutical Purpose and Tissue Engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 286, 119305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Amhare, A.F.; Lei, J.; Deng, H.; Lv, Y.; Han, J.; Zhang, L. Biomedical Application of Chondroitin Sulfate with Nanoparticles in Drug Delivery Systems: Systematic Review. J. Drug Target 2021, 29, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Abdallah, M.M.; Fernández, N.; Matias, A.A.; Bronze, M.d.R. Hyaluronic Acid and Chondroitin Sulfate from Marine and Terrestrial Sources: Extraction and Purification Methods. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 243, 116441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Edelman, R.; Engelberg, S.; Fahoum, L.; Meyron-Holtz, E.G.; Livney, Y.D. Potato Protein- Based Carriers for Enhancing Bioavailability of Astaxanthin. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 96, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lan, M.; Fu, Y.; Dai, H.; Ma, L.; Yu, Y.; Zhu, H.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y. Encapsulation of β-Carotene by Self-Assembly of Rapeseed Meal-Derived Peptides: Factor Optimization and Structural Characterization. LWT 2021, 138, 110456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Petrovici, A.R.; Pinteala, M.; Simionescu, N. Dextran Formulations as Effective Delivery Systems of Therapeutic Agents. Molecules 2023, 28, 1086. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. John, J.E.; Tytler, B.A.; Habila, J.; Apeji, Y.E.; Olayemi, O.; Isimi, C.Y. Cross-Linking with Multifunctional Excipients and Its Effect on the Physicochemical Properties and Release Profile of Ibuprofen-Loaded Digitaria exilis Starch Nanoparticles. J. Res. Pharm. 2022, 26, 1190–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jia, J.; Liu, G.; Guo, Z.-X.; Yu, J.; Duan, Y. Preparation and Characterization of Soluble Eggshell Membrane Protein/PLGA Electrospun Nanofibers for Guided Tissue Regeneration Membrane. J. Nanomater. 2012, 2012, 282736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, M.-C.; Huang, Y.-C. Soluble Eggshell Membrane Protein-Loaded Chitosan/Fucoidan Nanoparticles for Treatment of Defective Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 131, 949–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chai, Z.; Li, Y.; Liu, F.; Du, B.; Jiao, T.; Zhang, C.; Leng, X. Outer Eggshell Membrane as Delivery Vehicle for Polysaccharide/Protein Microcapsules Incorporated with Vitamin E. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dubashynskaya, N.V.; Gasilova, E.R.; Skorik, Y.A. Nano-Sized Fucoidan Interpolyelectrolyte Complexes: Recent Advances in Design and Prospects for Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2615. [Google Scholar]
  25. Saral, A.M.; Mathew, M.S.F. Excipient Profile and Future Possibilities of Fucoidan: A Review. Int. J. Pharm. Res. 2020, 12, 3786–3791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, J.; Wu, S.-Y.; Chen, L.; Li, Q.-J.; Shen, Y.-Z.; Jin, L.; Zhang, X.; Chen, P.-C.; Wu, M.-J.; Choi, J.; et al. Different Extraction Methods Bring about Distinct Physicochemical Properties and Antioxidant Activities of Sargassum Fusiforme Fucoidans. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 155, 1385–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Garg, S.S.; Gupta, J. Guar Gum-Based Nanoformulations: Implications for Improving Drug Delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 229, 476–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hadidi, M.; Rostamabadi, H.; Moreno, A.; Jafari, S.M. Nanoencapsulation of Essential Oils from Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) by-Products into Alfalfa Protein Nanoparticles. Food Chem. 2022, 386, 132765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Koralegedara, I.D.; Hettiarachchi, C.A.; Prasantha, B.D.R.; Wimalasiri, K.M.S. Synthesis of Nano-Scale Biopolymer Particles from Legume Protein Isolates and Carrageenan. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2020, 58, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mirmohammad Meiguni, M.S.; Salami, M.; Rezaei, K.; Ghaffari, S.B.; Aliyari, M.A.; Emam-Djomeh, Z.; Barazandegan, Y.; Gruen, I. Curcumin-Loaded Complex Coacervate Made of Mung Bean Protein Isolate and Succinylated Chitosan as a Novel Medium for Curcumin Encapsulation. J. Food Sci. 2022, 87, 4930–4944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ma, M.; Liu, X.; Ma, C.; Guo, R.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ren, X. Enhancing the Antitumor Immunosurveillance of PD-L1-Targeted Gene Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma Using Cationized Panax notoginseng Polysaccharide. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 226, 1309–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Simmons, J.; Nickels, J.D.; Michalski, M.; Grossutti, M.; Shamana, H.; Stanley, C.B.; Schwan, A.L.; Katsaras, J.; Dutcher, J.R. Structure, Hydration, and Interactions of Native and Hydrophobically Modified Phytoglycogen Nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules 2020, 21, 4053–4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, Y.; Wang, R.; Jiang, H.; Guan, X.; Yang, C.; Ngai, T. Chitosan-Coated Phytoglycogen for Preparation of Biocompatible Pickering Emulsions. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 644, 128861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xue, J.; Li, Z.; Duan, H.; He, J.; Luo, Y. Chemically Modified Phytoglycogen: Physicochemical Characterizations and Applications to Encapsulate Curcumin. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2021, 205, 111829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, Y.; Xue, J.; Wusigale; Wang, T.; Hu, Q.; Luo, Y. Carboxymethylation of Phytoglycogen and Its Interactions with Caseinate for the Preparation of Nanocomplex. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 100, 105390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ma, Y.; Adibnia, V.; Mitrache, M.; Halimi, I.; Walker, G.C.; Kumacheva, E. Stimulus-Responsive Nanoconjugates Derived from Phytoglycogen Nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules 2021, 23, 1928–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sweedman, M.C.; Tizzotti, M.J.; Schäfer, C.; Gilbert, R.G. Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Octenyl Succinic Anhydride Modified Starches: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 905–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Patel, S.; Ashwanikumar, N.; Robinson, E.; Xia, Y.; Mihai, C.; Griffith, J.P.; Hou, S.; Esposito, A.A.; Ketova, T.; Welsher, K.; et al. Naturally-Occurring Cholesterol Analogues in Lipid Nanoparticles Induce Polymorphic Shape and Enhance Intracellular Delivery of MRNA. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jovanović, A.A.; Balanč, B.D.; Ota, A.; Ahlin Grabnar, P.; Djordjević, V.B.; Šavikin, K.P.; Bugarski, B.M.; Nedović, V.A.; Poklar Ulrih, N. Comparative Effects of Cholesterol and β-Sitosterol on the Liposome Membrane Characteristics. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2018, 120, 1800039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bernardo, J.; Videira, R.A.; Valentão, P.; Veiga, F.; Andrade, P.B. Extraction of Phospholipid-Rich Fractions from Egg Yolk and Development of Liposomes Entrapping a Dietary Polyphenol with Neuroactive Potential. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 133, 110749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Srihera, N.; Li, Y.; Zhang, T.-T.; Wang, Y.-M.; Yanagita, T.; Waiprib, Y.; Xue, C.-H. Preparation and Characterization of Astaxanthin-Loaded Liposomes Stabilized by Sea Cucumber Sulfated Sterols Instead of Cholesterol. J. Oleo Sci. 2022, 71, ess21233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yuba, E.; Osaki, T.; Ono, M.; Park, S.; Harada, A.; Yamashita, M.; Azuma, K.; Tsuka, T.; Ito, N.; Imagawa, T.; et al. Bleomycin-Loaded PH-Sensitive Polymer–Lipid-Incorporated Liposomes for Cancer Chemotherapy. Polymers 2018, 10, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Le, N.T.T.; Du Cao, V.; Nguyen, T.N.Q.; Le, T.T.H.; Tran, T.T.; Hoang Thi, T.T. Soy Lecithin-Derived Liposomal Delivery Systems: Surface Modification and Current Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cansell, M.; Nacka, F.; Combe, N. Marine Lipid-Based Liposomes Increase In Vivo FA Bioavailability. Lipids 2003, 38, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, Z.; Zhang, R.X.; Zhang, T.; He, C.; He, R.; Ju, X.; Wu, X.Y. In Situ Proapoptotic Peptide-Generating Rapeseed Protein-Based Nanocomplexes Synergize Chemotherapy for Cathepsin-B Overexpressing Breast Cancer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 41056–41069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Echeverri, J.D.; Alhajj, M.J.; Montero, N.; Yarce, C.J.; Barrera-Ocampo, A.; Salamanca, C.H. Study of in Vitro and in Vivo Carbamazepine Release from Coarse and Nanometric Pharmaceutical Emulsions Obtained via Ultra-High-Pressure Homogenization. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Marzec, M.; Dąbek, P.; Witkowski, A.; Monedeiro, F.; Pomastowski, P.; Buszewski, B.; Nowak, I. Lipid Constituents of Diatoms (Halamphora) as Components for Production of Lipid Nanoparticles. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kumar, H.; Gehlaut, A.K.; Gupta, H.; Gaur, A.; Park, J.W. Development of Copper Loaded Nanoparticles Hydrogel Made from Waste Biomass (Sugarcane Bagasse) for Special Medical Application. In Proceedings of the Key Engineering Materials; Trans Tech Publications Ltd.: Stafa, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 847, pp. 102–107. [Google Scholar]
  49. Okagu, O.D.; Verma, O.; McClements, D.J.; Udenigwe, C.C. Utilization of Insect Proteins to Formulate Nutraceutical Delivery Systems: Encapsulation and Release of Curcumin Using Mealworm Protein-Chitosan Nano-Complexes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 151, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Picciotto, S.; Santonicola, P.; Paterna, A.; Rao, E.; Raccosta, S.; Romancino, D.P.; Noto, R.; Touzet, N.; Manno, M.; Di Schiavi, E.; et al. Extracellular Vesicles from Microalgae: Uptake Studies in Human Cells and Caenorhabditis Elegans. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 830189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Adamo, G.; Fierli, D.; Romancino, D.P.; Picciotto, S.; Barone, M.E.; Aranyos, A.; Božič, D.; Morsbach, S.; Raccosta, S.; Stanly, C.; et al. Nanoalgosomes: Introducing Extracellular Vesicles Produced by Microalgae. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2021, 10, e12081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, M.; Kim, J.A.; Huang, A.Y.-C. Optimizing Tumor Microenvironment for Cancer Immunotherapy: β-Glucan-Based Nanoparticles. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Huang, J.; Wu, C.; Tang, S.; Zhou, P.; Deng, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z. Chiral Active β-Glucan Nanoparticles for Synergistic Delivery of Doxorubicin and Immune Potentiation. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 5083–5095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhao, D.; Yu, S.; Sun, B.; Gao, S.; Guo, S.; Zhao, K. Biomedical Applications of Chitosan and Its Derivative Nanoparticles. Polymers 2018, 10, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ravi Kumar, M.N.V. A Review of Chitin and Chitosan Applications. React. Funct. Polym. 2000, 46, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ghormade, V.; Pathan, E.K.; Deshpande, M.V. Can Fungi Compete with Marine Sources for Chitosan Production? Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 104, 1415–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, W.; Du, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Wang, X.; Hu, Y.; Yang, J.; Cai, J.; Kennedy, J.F. A New Green Technology for Direct Production of Low Molecular Weight Chitosan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 74, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tayel, A.A.; Moussa, S.H.; El-Tras, W.F.; Elguindy, N.M.; Opwis, K. Antimicrobial Textile Treated with Chitosan from Aspergillus niger Mycelial Waste. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 49, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Gao, X. Astragalus membranaceus Extract Promotes Neovascularisation by VEGF Pathway in Rat Model of Ischemic Injury. Pharmazie 2011, 66, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Ko, J.K.-S.; Chik, C.W.-S. The Protective Action of Radix Astragalus membranaceus against Hapten-Induced Colitis through Modulation of Cytokines. Cytokine 2009, 47, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Xu, D.-J.; Xia, Q.; Wang, J.-J.; Wang, P.-P. Molecular Weight and Monosaccharide Composition of Astragalus Polysaccharides. Molecules 2008, 13, 2408–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tiippana, E.; Hamunen, K.; Heiskanen, T.; Nieminen, T.; Kalso, E.; Kontinen, V.K. New Approach for Treatment of Prolonged Postoperative Pain: APS Out-Patient Clinic. Scand. J. Pain 2016, 12, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Jin, L.; Yixi, B.; Waikei, L.; Wenwen, L.; Fang, L.; Xuan, Z.; Jing, L.; Hongping, W. Immunoregulatory and Anti-Tumor Effects of Polysaccharopeptide and Astragalus polysaccharides on Tumor-Bearing Mice. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2008, 30, 771–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Volpi, N. Chondroitin Sulfate Safety and Quality. Molecules 2019, 24, 1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Besednova, N.N.; Zaporozhets, T.S.; Kuznetsova, T.A.; Makarenkova, I.D.; Kryzhanovsky, S.P.; Fedyanina, L.N.; Ermakova, S.P. Extracts and Marine Algae Polysaccharides in Therapy and Prevention of Inflammatory Diseases of the Intestine. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Huang, L.; Yao, Y. Particulate Structure of Phytoglycogen Nanoparticles Probed Using Amyloglucosidase. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 83, 1665–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Takechi-Haraya, Y.; Matsuoka, M.; Imai, H.; Izutsu, K.; Sakai-Kato, K. Detection of Material-Derived Differences in the Stiffness of Egg Yolk Phosphatidylcholine-Containing Liposomes Using Atomic Force Microscopy. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2020, 233, 104992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Kondratowicz, A.; Weiss, M.; Juzwa, W.; Majchrzycki, Ł.; Lewandowicz, G. Characteristics of Liposomes Derived from Egg Yolk. Open Chem. 2019, 17, 763–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chen, B.; Wang, X.; Lin, D.; Xu, D.; Li, S.; Huang, J.; Weng, S.; Lin, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Yao, H.; et al. Proliposomes for Oral Delivery of Total Biflavonoids Extract from Selaginella Doederleinii: Formulation Development, Optimization, and in Vitro-in Vivo Characterization. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 6691–6706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hu, C.; Zhang, W. Micro/Nano Emulsion Delivery Systems: Effects of Potato Protein/Chitosan Complex on the Stability, Oxidizability, Digestibility and β—Carotene Release Characteristics of the Emulsion. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2022, 77, 102980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hong, S.; Choi, D.W.; Kim, H.N.; Park, C.G.; Lee, W.; Park, H.H. Protein-Based Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Systems. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Islam, F.; Amer Ali, Y.; Imran, A.; Afzaal, M.; Zahra, S.M.; Fatima, M.; Saeed, F.; Usman, I.; Shehzadi, U.; Mehta, S.; et al. Vegetable Proteins as Encapsulating Agents: Recent Updates and Future Perspectives. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 1705–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yi-Shen, Z.; Shuai, S.; FitzGerald, R. Mung Bean Proteins and Peptides: Nutritional, Functional and Bioactive Properties. Food Nutr. Res. 2018, 62, 1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hadidi, M.; Khaksar, F.B.; Pagan, J.; Ibarz, A. Application of Ultrasound-Ultrafiltration-Assisted Alkaline Isoelectric Precipitation (UUAAIP) Technique for Producing Alfalfa Protein Isolate for Human Consumption: Optimization, Comparison, Physicochemical, and Functional Properties. Food Res. Int. 2020, 130, 108907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bohara, R.A.; Tabassum, N.; Singh, M.P.; Gigli, G.; Ragusa, A.; Leporatti, S. Recent Overview of Resveratrol’s Beneficial Effects and Its Nano-Delivery Systems. Molecules 2022, 27, 5154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sahadevan, R.; Singh, S.; Binoy, A.; Sadhukhan, S. Chemico-Biological Aspects of (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) to Improve Its Stability, Bioavailability and Membrane Permeability: Current Status and Future Prospects. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Scheepens, A.; Tan, K.; Paxton, J.W. Improving the Oral Bioavailability of Beneficial Polyphenols through Designed Synergies. Genes Nutr. 2010, 5, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Choiri, Z.; Danar Dono, N.; Ariyadi, B.; Hanim, C.; Martien, R.; Zuprizal. Effect of Nano-Encapsulation of Noni (Morinda citrifolia) Fruit Extract on Jejunal Morphology and Microbial Populations in Laying Hens. Pak. J. Nutr. 2017, 17, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Rahman Mohd, M.; Ariff, T.M.; Mohamad, N.; Zubaidi, A.; Latif, A.; Norsani, W.M.; Nik, W.; Mohamed, A.; Fahim, I.; Suffian, M. Development of Biodegradable Sustained-Release Damnacanthal Nanocapsules for Potential Application in In-Vitro Breast Cancer Studies. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 32, 2155–2162. [Google Scholar]
  80. Negreanu-Pirjol, B.-S.; Oprea, O.C.; Negreanu-Pirjol, T.; Roncea, F.N.; Prelipcean, A.-M.; Craciunescu, O.; Iosageanu, A.; Artem, V.; Ranca, A.; Motelica, L.; et al. Health Benefits of Antioxidant Bioactive Compounds in the Fruits and Leaves of Lonicera caerulea L. and Aronia melanocarpa (Michx.) Elliot. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Abdol Wahab, N.R.; Meor Mohd Affandi, M.M.R.; Fakurazi, S.; Alias, E.; Hassan, H. Nanocarrier System: State-of-the-Art in Oral Delivery of Astaxanthin. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yamauchi, K.; Wakabayashi, H.; Shin, K.; Takase, M. Bovine Lactoferrin: Benefits and Mechanism of Action against Infections. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2006, 84, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Azad, M.O.K.; Kang, W.S.; Lim, J.D.; Park, C.H. Bio-Fortification of Angelica gigas Nakai Nano-Powder Using Bio-Polymer by Hot Melt Extrusion to Enhance the Bioaccessibility and Functionality of Nutraceutical Compounds. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lin, Y.; Yin, W.; Li, Y.; Liu, G. Influence of Different Solid Lipids on the Properties of a Novel Nanostructured Lipid Carrier Containing Antarctic Krill Oil. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 2886–2895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sudirman, S.; Hsu, Y.H.; Johnson, A.; Tsou, D.; Kong, Z.L. Amelioration Effects of Nanoencapsulated Triterpenoids from Petri Dish-Cultured Antrodia cinnamomea on Reproductive Function of Diabetic Male Rats. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 5059–5073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Andreu, S.; Ripa, I.; Bello-Morales, R.; López-Guerrero, J.A. Liposomal Lactoferrin Exerts Antiviral Activity against HCoV-229E and SARS-CoV-2 Pseudoviruses In Vitro. Viruses 2023, 15, 972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Soliman, S.M.; Mosallam, S.; Mamdouh, M.A.; Hussein, M.A.; El-Halim, S.M.A. Design and Optimization of Cranberry Extract Loaded Bile Salt Augmented Liposomes for Targeting of MCP-1/STAT3/VEGF Signaling Pathway in DMN-Intoxicated Liver in Rats. Drug Deliv. 2022, 29, 427–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kaur, A.; Gabrani, R.; Dang, S. Nanoemulsions of Green Tea Catechins and Other Natural Compounds for the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection: Antibacterial Analysis. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2019, 9, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Jeong, S.J.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, H.G. Nanoencapsulation of Synergistic Antioxidant Fruit and Vegetable Concentrates and Their Stability during in Vitro Digestion. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 1056–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Alfaro-Viquez, E.; Esquivel-Alvarado, D.; Madrigal-Carballo, S.; Krueger, C.G.; Reed, J.D. Proanthocyanidin-Chitosan Composite Nanoparticles Prevent Bacterial Invasion and Colonization of Gut Epithelial Cells by Extra-Intestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 135, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Taghiloo, S.; Ghajari, G.; Zand, Z.; Kabiri-Samani, S.; Kabiri, H.; Rajaei, N.; Piri-Gharaghie, T. Designing Alginate/Chitosan Nanoparticles Containing Echinacea Angustifolia: A Novel Candidate for Combating Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus. Chem. Biodivers. 2023, 20, e202201008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Moghtaderi, M.; Mirzaie, A.; Zabet, N.; Moammeri, A.; Mansoori-Kermani, A.; Akbarzadeh, I.; Eshrati Yeganeh, F.; Chitgarzadeh, A.; Bagheri Kashtali, A.; Ren, Q. Enhanced Antibacterial Activity of Echinacea angustifolia Extract against Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae through Niosome Encapsulation. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Tyagi, T.; Garlapati, P.K.; Yadav, P.; Naika, M.; Mallya, A.; Kandangath Raghavan, A. Development of Nano-Encapsulated Green Tea Catechins: Studies on Optimization, Characterization, Release Dynamics, and in-Vitro Toxicity. J. Food Biochem. 2021, 45, e13951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rodríguez Pescador, A.; Gutiérrez Romero, L.; Blanco-González, E.; Montes-Bayón, M.; Sierra, L.M. Intracellular Biotransformation of Ultrasmall Iron Oxide Nanoparticles and Their Effect in Cultured Human Cells and in Drosophila Larvae In Vivo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Helman, S.L.; Wilkins, S.J.; McKeating, D.R.; Perkins, A.V.; Cuffe, J.S.M.; Hartel, G.; Faria, N.; Powell, J.J.; Anderson, G.J.; Frazer, D.M. A Novel Ferritin-Core Analog Is a Safe and Effective Alternative to Oral Ferrous Iron for Treating Iron Deficiency during Pregnancy in Mice. J. Nutr. 2022, 152, 714–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Pereira, D.I.A.; Mohammed, N.I.; Ofordile, O.; Camara, F.; Baldeh, B.; Mendy, T.; Sanyang, C.; Jallow, A.T.; Hossain, I.; Wason, J.; et al. A Novel Nano-Iron Supplement to Safely Combat Iron Deficiency and Anaemia in Young Children: The IHAT-GUT Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Trial Protocol. Gates Open Res. 2018, 2, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhang, D.; Jiang, Y.; Xiang, M.; Wu, F.; Sun, M.; Du, X.F.; Chen, L. Biocompatible Polyelectrolyte Complex Nanoparticles for Lycopene Encapsulation Attenuate Oxidative Stress-Induced Cell Damage. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 902208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhao, Y.; Xin, Z.; Li, N.; Chang, S.; Chen, Y.; Geng, L.; Chang, H.; Shi, H.; Chang, Y.-Z. Nano-Liposomes of Lycopene Reduces Ischemic Brain Damage in Rodents by Regulating Iron Metabolism. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 124, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Vasconcelos, A.G.; Barros, A.L.A.N.; Cabral, W.F.; Moreira, D.C.; da Silva, I.G.M.; Silva-Carvalho, A.; de Almeida, M.P.; Albuquerque, L.F.F.; dos Santos, R.C.; Ana, A.K.; et al. Promising Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery System Loaded with Lycopene from Red Guava (Psidium Guajava L.): In Vivo Toxicity, Biodistribution and Cytotoxicity on DU-145 Prostate Cancer Cells. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2021, 12, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Al-Eisa, R.A. Synergistic Antioxidant Capacity of Chitosan Nanoparticles and Lycopene against Aging Hepatotoxicity Induced by D-Galactose in Male Rats. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 14, 811–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Li, W.; Yalcin, M.; Lin, Q.; Ardawi, M.-S.M.; Mousa, S.A. Self-Assembly of Green Tea Catechin Derivatives in Nanoparticles for Oral Lycopene Delivery. J. Control. Release 2017, 248, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Jain, A.; Sharma, G.; Ghoshal, G.; Kesharwani, P.; Singh, B.; Shivhare, U.S.; Katare, O.P. Lycopene Loaded Whey Protein Isolate Nanoparticles: An Innovative Endeavor for Enhanced Bioavailability of Lycopene and Anti-Cancer Activity. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 546, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Li, G.; Lu, Y.; Fan, Y.; Ning, Q.; Li, W. Enhanced Oral Bioavailability of Magnolol via Mixed Micelles and Nanosuspensions Based on Soluplus ® -Poloxamer 188. Drug Deliv. 2020, 27, 1010–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cao, J.; Zhang, S.; Hao, Y.; Fan, K.; Wang, L.; Zhao, X.; He, X. Amorphous Solid Dispersion Preparation via Coprecipitation Improves the Dissolution, Oral Bioavailability, and Intestinal Health Enhancement Properties of Magnolol. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wang, X.; Gu, H.; Zhang, H.; Xian, J.; Li, J.; Fu, C.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J. Oral Core–Shell Nanoparticles Embedded in Hydrogel Microspheres for the Efficient Site-Specific Delivery of Magnolol and Enhanced Antiulcerative Colitis Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 33948–33961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ding, P.; Shen, H.; Wang, J.; Ju, J. Improved Oral Bioavailability of Magnolol by Using a Binary Mixed Micelle System. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2018, 46, 668–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Shen, H.; Liu, S.; Ding, P.; Wang, L.; Ju, J.; Liang, G. Enhancement of Oral Bioavailability of Magnolol by Encapsulation in Mixed Micelles Containing Pluronic F127 and L61. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2018, 70, 498–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Guo, S.J.; Ma, C.G.; Hu, Y.Y.; Bai, G.; Song, Z.J.; Cao, X.Q. Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Phytosterols Delivery: The Acyl Chain Number of the Glyceride Matrix Affects the Arrangement, Stability, and Release. Food Chem. 2022, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Afzal, O.; Akhter, M.H.; Ahmad, I.; Muzammil, K.; Dawria, A.; Zeyaullah, M.; Altamimi, A.S.A.; Khalilullah, H.; Mir Najib Ullah, S.N.; Rahman, M.A.; et al. A β–Sitosterol Encapsulated Biocompatible Alginate/Chitosan Polymer Nanocomposite for the Treatment of Breast Cancer. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Karim, S.; Akhter, M.H.; Burzangi, A.S.; Alkreathy, H.; Alharthy, B.; Kotta, S.; Md, S.; Rashid, M.A.; Afzal, O.; Altamimi, A.S.A.; et al. Phytosterol-Loaded Surface-Tailored Bioactive-Polymer Nanoparticles for Cancer Treatment: Optimization, In Vitro Cell Viability, Antioxidant Activity, and Stability Studies. Gels 2022, 8, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Ubeyitogullari, A.; Moreau, R.; Rose, D.J.; Zhang, J.; Ciftci, O.N. Enhancing the Bioaccessibility of Phytosterols Using Nanoporous Corn and Wheat Starch Bioaerogels. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2019, 121, 1700229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ubeyitogullari, A.; Moreau, R.; Rose, D.J.; Ciftci, O.N. In Vitro Bioaccessibility of Low-Crystallinity Phytosterol Nanoparticles Generated Using Nanoporous Starch Bioaerogels. J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 1812–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Liu, L.; Xu, Y.; Chen, F.; Zhang, S.; Li, L.; Ban, Z. Soy Proteins as Vehicles for Enhanced Bioaccessibility and Cholesterol-Lowering Activity of Phytosterols. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2023, 103, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Gan, C.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, T.; He, W.S.; Jia, C. A Novel Phytosterols Delivery System Based on Sodium Caseinate-Pectin Soluble Complexes: Improving Stability and Bioaccessibility. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 124, 107295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Feng, S.; Yan, J.; Wang, D.; Jiang, L.; Sun, P.; Xiang, N.; Shao, P. Preparation and Characterization of Soybean Protein Isolate/Pectin-Based Phytosterol Nanodispersions and Their Stability in Simulated Digestion. Food Res. Int. 2021, 143, 110237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Feng, S.; Wang, D.; Gan, L.; Shao, P.; Jiang, L.; Sun, P. Preparation and Characterization of Zein/Pectin-Based Phytosterol Nanodispersions and Kinetic Study of Phytosterol Release during Simulated Digestion in Vitro. LWT 2020, 128, 109446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Rathod, S.; Arya, S.; Kanike, S.; Shah, S.A.; Bahadur, P.; Tiwari, S. Advances on Nanoformulation Approaches for Delivering Plant-Derived Antioxidants: A Case of Quercetin. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 625, 122093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Nowak, J.K.; Krzyzanowska-Jankowska, P.; Drzymała-Czyz, S.; Gozdzik-Spychalska, J.; Wojsyk-Banaszak, I.; Skorupa, W.; Sapiejka, E.; Miskiewicz-Chotnicka, A.; Brylak, J.; Zielinska-Psuja, B.; et al. Fat-Soluble Vitamins in Standard vs. Liposomal Form Enriched with Vitamin K2 in Cystic Fibrosis: A Randomized Multi-Center Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Dalmoro, A.; Bochicchio, S.; Lamberti, G.; Bertoncin, P.; Janssens, B.; Barba, A.A. Micronutrients Encapsulation in Enhanced Nanoliposomal Carriers by a Novel Preparative Technology. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 19800–19812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Algan, A.H.; Gungor-Ak, A.; Karatas, A. Nanoscale Delivery Systems of Lutein: An Updated Review from a Pharmaceutical Perspective. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Vitulo, M.; Gnodi, E.; Meneveri, R.; Barisani, D. Interactions between Nanoparticles and Intestine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ladaycia, A.; Passirani, C.; Lepeltier, E. Microbiota and Nanoparticles: Description and Interactions. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2021, 169, 220–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. McClements, D.J.; Xiao, H. Is Nano Safe in Foods? Establishing the Factors Impacting the Gastrointestinal Fate and Toxicity of Organic and Inorganic Food-Grade Nanoparticles. NPJ Sci. Food 2017, 1, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Manocha, S.; Dhiman, S.; Grewal, A.S.; Guarve, K. Nanotechnology: An Approach to Overcome Bioavailability Challenges of Nutraceuticals. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022, 72, 103418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Chai, J.; Jiang, P.; Wang, P.; Jiang, Y.; Li, D.; Bao, W.; Liu, B.; Liu, B.; Zhao, L.; Norde, W.; et al. The Intelligent Delivery Systems for Bioactive Compounds in Foods: Physicochemical and Physiological Conditions, Absorption Mechanisms, Obstacles and Responsive Strategies. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 78, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions a New Circular Economy Action Plan for a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1583933814386&uri=COM:2020:98:FIN (accessed on 3 November 2023).
  127. More, S.; Bampidis, V.; Benford, D.; Bragard, C.; Halldorsson, T.; Hernández-Jerez, A.; Bennekou, S.H.; Koutsoumanis, K.; Lambré, C.; Machera, K.; et al. Guidance on Technical Requirements for Regulated Food and Feed Product Applications to Establish the Presence of Small Particles Including Nanoparticles. EFSA J. 2021, 19, e06769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. More, S.; Bampidis, V.; Benford, D.; Bragard, C.; Halldorsson, T.; Hernández-Jerez, A.; Hougaard Bennekou, S.; Koutsoumanis, K.; Lambré, C.; Machera, K.; et al. Guidance on Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials to Be Applied in the Food and Feed Chain: Human and Animal Health. EFSA J. 2021, 19, e06768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Schoonjans, R.; Castenmiller, J.; Chaudhry, Q.; Cubadda, F.; Daskaleros, T.; Franz, R.; Gott, D.; Mast, J.; Mortensen, A.; Oomen, A.G.; et al. Regulatory Safety Assessment of Nanoparticles for the Food Chain in Europe. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 134, 98–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Halamoda-Kenzaoui, B.; Bremer-Hoffmann, S. Main Trends of Immune Effects Triggered by Nanomedicines in Preclinical Studies. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 5419–5431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Bilia, A.; Piazzini, V.; Guccione, C.; Risaliti, L.; Asprea, M.; Capecchi, G.; Bergonzi, M. Improving on Nature: The Role of Nanomedicine in the Development of Clinical Natural Drugs. Planta Med. 2017, 83, 366–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Bilia, A.R.; Piazzini, V.; Risaliti, L.; Vanti, G.; Casamonti, M.; Wang, M.; Bergonzi, M.C. Nanocarriers: A Successful Tool to Increase Solubility, Stability and Optimise Bioefficacy of Natural Constituents. Curr. Med. Chem. 2019, 26, 4631–4656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scheme of the authorization process of Novel Foods in Europe.
Figure 1. Scheme of the authorization process of Novel Foods in Europe.
Pharmaceutics 15 02614 g001
Figure 2. Novel foods as bioactive compounds or sources of materials for nanocarrier development.
Figure 2. Novel foods as bioactive compounds or sources of materials for nanocarrier development.
Pharmaceutics 15 02614 g002
Table 1. Materials listed in the Novel Food catalog and used for producing nanoparticles.
Table 1. Materials listed in the Novel Food catalog and used for producing nanoparticles.
Material(s) from Novel FoodsType of CarrierReferences
Astragalus membranaceus root extractPolysaccharide nanoparticles[8,9]
CellobioseCryoprotectant for liposomes[10]
Chia seed oil from Salvia hispanica L.Liposomes and nanoemulsions[11]
Chitosan extracted from fungi (Aspergillus niger; Agaricus bisporus)Chitosan nanoparticles[8,12,13]
Chondroitin sulphate (synthetic)Polysaccharide nanoparticles[14,15,16]
Coagulated potato proteinsProtein-based nanoparticles[17,18]
Dextran from Leuconostoc mesenteroidesPolysaccharide nanoparticlesReviewed by [19]
Digitaria exilisPolysaccharide nanoparticles[20]
Eggshell membrane protein hydrolysateProtein-based nanoparticles[21,22,23]
Fucoidan extracted from the seaweed Fucus vesiculosus and Undaria pinnatifidaPolysaccharide nanoparticles[24,25,26]
Guar gumPolysaccharide nanoparticles [27]
Lucerne leaf extract from Medicago sativaProtein-based nanoparticles[28]
Mung bean seed proteins from Vigna radiataProtein-based nanoparticles[29,30]
Panax notoginseng root extractPolysaccharide nanoparticles[31]
PhytoglycogenPolysaccharide nanoparticles
Polyelectrolyte complex
[32,33,34,35,36,37]
PhytosterolsSolid lipid nanoparticles
Liposomes
[38,39]
Phospholipids from egg yolkLiposomes[40,41,42]
Phosphatidylserine from soya and fish phospholipids Liposomes[43,44]
Rapeseed protein from Brassica napus L. and Brassica rapa L.Protein-based nanoparticles[18,45]
Sacha inchi seed oil from Plukenetia volubilisNanoemulsions[46]
Schizochytrium sp. oilNanostructure lipid nanoparticles[47]
Sugar cane fiberPolysaccharide nanoparticles[48]
Tenebrio molitor L.Protein-based nanoparticles[49]
Tetraselmis chuii microalgaeExtracellular vesicles[50,51]
Trehalose Cryoprotectant for liposomes[10]
Yeast β-glucanPolysaccharide nanoparticles[52,53]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Truzzi, E.; Bertelli, D.; Bilia, A.R.; Vanti, G.; Maretti, E.; Leo, E. Combination of Nanodelivery Systems and Constituents Derived from Novel Foods: A Comprehensive Review. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15112614

AMA Style

Truzzi E, Bertelli D, Bilia AR, Vanti G, Maretti E, Leo E. Combination of Nanodelivery Systems and Constituents Derived from Novel Foods: A Comprehensive Review. Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(11):2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15112614

Chicago/Turabian Style

Truzzi, Eleonora, Davide Bertelli, Anna Rita Bilia, Giulia Vanti, Eleonora Maretti, and Eliana Leo. 2023. "Combination of Nanodelivery Systems and Constituents Derived from Novel Foods: A Comprehensive Review" Pharmaceutics 15, no. 11: 2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15112614

APA Style

Truzzi, E., Bertelli, D., Bilia, A. R., Vanti, G., Maretti, E., & Leo, E. (2023). Combination of Nanodelivery Systems and Constituents Derived from Novel Foods: A Comprehensive Review. Pharmaceutics, 15(11), 2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15112614

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop