Next Article in Journal
Glycovaccine Design: Optimization of Model and Antitubercular Carrier Glycosylation via Disuccinimidyl Homobifunctional Linker
Next Article in Special Issue
Veering to a Continuous Platform of Fused Deposition Modeling Based 3D Printing for Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Understanding the Effect of Layer Orientation on Formulation Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Nanostructured Lipid Carrier Co-Loaded with Docetaxel and Magnetic Nanoparticles: Physicochemical Characterization and In Vitro Evaluation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hot Melt Extruded Posaconazole-Based Amorphous Solid Dispersions—The Effect of Different Types of Polymers
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Evidence of Strong Guest–Host Interactions in Simvastatin Loaded in Mesoporous Silica MCM-41

Pharmaceutics 2023, 15(5), 1320; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15051320
by Teresa Cordeiro 1, Inês Matos 1, Florence Danède 2, João C. Sotomayor 1, Isabel M. Fonseca 1, Marta C. Corvo 3, Madalena Dionísio 1, María Teresa Viciosa 4, Frédéric Affouard 2 and Natália T. Correia 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Pharmaceutics 2023, 15(5), 1320; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15051320
Submission received: 31 March 2023 / Revised: 15 April 2023 / Accepted: 20 April 2023 / Published: 22 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Amorphous Drug)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The submitted manuscript is very interesting, presents huge amount of new information on the very important API, simvastatin. The Authors have combined a lot of experimental (physiochemical) and theoretical methods in order to get a full insight into the studied composite, bravo! However, it also requires major revision before it can be proceeded further.

Abstract is significantly too long, it should be shortened, i.e. by removing the parts from lines 31-38

In the introduction it should be stated if the MCM-41 can be used as an excipient? I’m very worried about its cytotoxicity.

Line 51, not “science” but “sciences”

Line 64, at this point some information about the polymorphism of SIM would be beneficial

Lines 101-123, this part should be moved to the Discussion as it presents your results. It shouldn’t be the par of Materials and Methods.

Line 156, the recycle delay is quite short. Are you sure the 2s is sufficient to prevent the signal saturation?

Line 210, why not NPT?

Figure 4, what was the refcode of the crystal used for the PXRD simulations? I guess the structure originated from CCDC, yes?

Figure 5, the spectra of amorphous and crystalline SIM should be presented for comparison. If it is impossible for the Authors to record the spectra on their own, which would be best, please copy the spectra from the previous (cited) works. Nowadays, obtaining permission to copy the figure from previous works is quite simple.

ssNMR, those kind of spectra can be obtained when the recycle delay is too short. It would be reasonable to apply longer recycle delay.

 

 

 

Minor editing of English language required

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The Authors loaded simvastatin, an antihyperlipidemic drug, in a mesoporous silica matrix in order to obtain its stable amorphization which can ensure an improvement of its pharmaceutical behavior. Thus, the issue of this paper is of sure interest for the pharmaceutical researcher since the issues of the low solubility and the instability of the amorphous phase are very common in the pharmaceutical field.

The Authors made an extensive work. They used a number of techniques and made a reasoned discussion of all the results obtained. The text is well written.

 

There are only few minor revisions that needed to be addressed:

-According to the IUPAC recommendations, for DSC and TGA techniques, the term “curve” should be used instead of “thermogram”.  Thus, please make the necessary changes in the text.

-Table 2 makes no contribution to the text, it can be delated.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The revised version can be accepted for publication.

Back to TopTop